The BMPT Terminator's turret armor features large steel arrays and dual-layer dynamic protection.

14 803 41
The BMPT Terminator's turret armor features large steel arrays and dual-layer dynamic protection.

Support combat vehicle tanks The Terminator, now renamed to the utterly absurd Spiridon, is considered one of the most well-protected domestic armored vehicles. This isn't just due to its rational design, which, for example, includes fully sealed fuel tanks, significantly reducing the risk of fires and complete destruction of the vehicle if hit.

Of no small importance is the Terminator's armor and dynamic protection, which, at least in part, is designed in a very original way for its turret: it contains a very, very large amount of steel, and the dynamic protection, using elements of the Relikt, is two-layered, which is completely atypical for tanks like the T-90M or T-80BVM, which have been equipped with it for several years now.



Passive turret armor


Perhaps we should start with the fact that the BMPT Terminator has a turret. Naturally, it doesn't look a bit like a typical tank turret. In fact, it's a low-profile platform with remote armament in the form of a pair of 30mm automatic cannons and launchers for missiles "Attack" and machine gun.


The BMPT Terminator turret. Aerial view. Source: radiosputnik.ru

It also forms the fighting compartment for the commander and gunner. Its roof houses hatches for these crew members, the gunner's sight, and the commander's prismatic observation devices. Despite its relatively modest dimensions, especially in height, the turret boasts impressive frontal armor.

This, of course, has long been known, as the drawings and some sketches leaked online quite some time ago. However, a more or less coherent visualization of the armor's composition was lacking until a Chinese enthusiast nicknamed "Object-477" took up the matter. Based on available information, he compiled a fascinating image showing the components and their thicknesses.

It is attached below.


BMPT Terminator turret armor diagram. Author: Object-477

Abbreviations:

— 21F — anti-neutron material;
— PPU — rigid polyurethane foam;
— St — steel;
— RHA — medium hardness armor steel;
— HHA — high hardness armor steel;
— ERA — dynamic protection;
— Relikt ERA — DZ “Relikt”;
— 4S23 — element DZ 4S23;
— Rb — rubber;
— Gap — clearance / air gap.

Now let's move on to the composition and thicknesses according to the sections in the image, that is, A-A, B-B and C-C.

Section A-A:

2 mm steel + DZ "Relic" 4S23, 2 × (80 mm RHA + 30 mm 21F) + 30 mm HHA + 50 mm HHA + 20 mm 21F + 80 mm RHA.

Section B-B:

23 mm HHA + 2 × DZ "Relic" 4S23, 23 mm HHA + 45 mm PPU + 60 mm HHA + 5 mm rubber + 3 mm steel + 14 mm gap + 50 mm HHA + 20 mm 21F + 80 mm RHA.

Section C-C:

23 mm HHA + 2 × DZ "Relic" 4S23, 23 mm HHA + 45 mm PPU + 60 mm HHA + 5 mm rubber + 3 mm steel + 14 mm gap + 60 mm HHA + 20 mm 21F + 80 mm RHA / 130 mm RHA at 0°.

What can be said about these "sandwiches"? First and foremost, they lack any unnecessary "show-off" elements like ceramics and other complex components. On the one hand, this is a major omission, as such components could significantly reduce the weight of the armor protection while maintaining the same durability.

On the other hand, they're essentially unnecessary. The Terminator's frontal turret armor is relatively compact, so weight wasn't a major consideration. They crammed in a huge amount of medium- and high-hardness steel plates, spiced them up with anti-HEAT reflective (intumescent) plates in a combination of 60 mm HHA + 5 mm rubber + 3 mm steel + 14 mm gap in the B-B and C-C sections.

Taking all this into account, and especially the thickness and angles of the steel arrays, as well as the presence of dynamic protection, we can confidently say that the BMPT Terminator turret is superior in resistance to both cumulative and kinetic weapons to the turrets of tanks such as the T-72B and even, very likely, the T-90M.

Now about the dynamic protection itself.

Two-layer dynamic protection


If we take as an example a typical carrier of the "Relikt" dynamic armor, such as the T-90M, T-80BVM, and even the current new T-72B3M modifications, assembled from the T-72A, we'll notice one common detail. The "Relikt" on them is implemented as a single-layer "overlay" on top of the armor.

In other words, all Relikt modules are a simple sandwich consisting of two thick steel plates—outer and rear—with 4S23 dynamic protection elements (or ERA) sandwiched between them. The ERA itself is actually two thin steel plates, with an explosive-like layer sandwiched between them.


Inert (mock-up) elements of dynamic protection. From left to right: 4S24 – for the Karkas ERA and other light armored vehicle systems, 4S23 – for the Relikt ERA, 4S22 – for the Kontakt-5 ERA, 4S20 – for the Kontakt-1 ERA (also initially installed in the Kontakt-5 ERA). JSC Research Institute of Steel.

When the explosives detonate in the ERD, thick steel plates begin to move in opposite directions, causing a destructive impact on the subcaliber projectile or shaped-charge jet. The front plate strikes head-on, while the rear plate follows suit.


A simple diagram of the Relikt dynamic protection system. The arrows indicate the bidirectional launch of thick steel plates.

The solution is simple, as it requires no modifications to the tank's armor or massive mountings. It's also effective—the Relikt provides decent protection against kinetic and shaped-charge rounds, including some tandem munitions. However, equipping the Terminator's turret with dynamic armor provides significantly greater resistance to projectile weapons.

It uses the same "relic" 4S23 dynamic protection elements, but in a completely different configuration. You can see what this looks like by looking at the diagram attached below. It shows that the dynamic protection has two thick, projectile-launched plates (labeled as the first and second ERA elements).


In fact, this is a two-layer dynamic protection, in which the elements are triggered in turn with a slight delay - first the first, then the second.

When a subcaliber projectile hits the first slab, the resulting fragments detonate the explosives in the explosive reactive zone (ERZ), forcing the slab toward the projectile, damaging it. The second slab then begins to move—the explosion of the EZZ of the first layer triggers the detonation of the EZZ of the second layer.

In other words, the projectile is hit twice by heavy steel plates in a fraction of a second, significantly reducing its armor penetration. For projectiles like the Soviet Mango APFSDS, this reduction can reach 50% or more. A slightly smaller, but still noticeable, effect can also be achieved by ERA when hit by Western APFSDS projectiles, including those with segmented warheads adapted to penetrate dynamic armor.

If a shaped-charge munition impacts, the explosives in both layers of the ERP detonate upon contact with the shaped-charge jet. As with sub-caliber projectiles, the jet is also impacted by two thick steel plates. The energy of the ERP explosion and its thin plates also have an additional negative effect on the jet.

The reduction in armor penetration of HEAT munitions when this dual-layer protection is activated can reach up to 80%. Moreover, this reactive armor can also resist tandem HEAT projectiles and missiles, as the detonation of the second layer occurs with a slight delay—the second plate thrown has time to impact the main charge's jet.

Conclusions


The armor structure and dynamic protection system described in this article allow us to conclude that the BMPT Terminator's turret protection exceeds that of virtually all Soviet-era tanks. It can effectively resist both subcaliber projectiles and shaped-charge (HEAT) rounds, including tandem-charge munitions.

This isn't surprising, though. The vehicle was designed specifically to operate in the same battle formation as tanks, and anything can hit them—from ATGMs to armor-piercing sabot rounds. It's just a shame that powerful frontal protection alone isn't particularly relevant anymore, since drones They can hit vulnerable spots. But for its time, the product was quite interesting.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 12
    11 July 2026 04: 03
    Spiridon? what
    Terminator is a dividing line that separates the illuminated (light) part of a celestial body from the unilluminated (dark) part.
    A terminator is a DNA nucleotide sequence that serves as a signal for RNA polymerase to stop synthesizing the RNA molecule and dissociate (separate) from the transcription complex.
    A terminator is an energy absorber (usually a resistor) installed at the end of a long signal line. Its resistance is equal to the line's characteristic impedance.
    Why change it? Choose any value...
    1. +6
      11 July 2026 07: 16
      Terminate – to stop, interrupt, terminate, discontinue, etc. And the terminator is the one who does it. This could be a button on the control panel, a program, a robot from the future, or even a BMPT. Who knows what Spiridon does.
      1. +4
        11 July 2026 07: 39
        Quote: sifgame
        Who knows what Spiridon is doing.

        Saint Spyridon was a Bolshevik and engaged in expropriation! wassat
        One day, a greedy grain merchant refused to give grain to a poor man. Spyridon predicted that a rainstorm would destroy the merchant's barn that night, and he himself would beg the poor man to take the grain for free. And so it happened. (C)
      2. +2
        11 July 2026 21: 44
        Who knows what Spiridon is doing.

        What does he do? He mercilessly drives away his enemies. Yes
    2. +4
      11 July 2026 18: 04
      Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
      Why was it necessary to change?

      Well, when things don't get done, we always start renaming things so people don't ask where the money is. Like when they renamed the spaceship from the Federation to the Eagle, but it never actually took off.
    3. +1
      12 July 2026 11: 34
      Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
      Why was it necessary to change?

      They should have thought about it from the start and realized that the word "Terminator" would be associated with a Hollywood product. True, there's no one to blame these days. It's as if the term just stuck. The good news is, changing the wrapper doesn't change the flavor of the candy. But some lesson needs to be learned from this situation. GRAU employees also need more training in philosophy and marketing. lol
  2. -1
    11 July 2026 04: 13
    This machine should be modified so that it could automatically shoot down drones.
    Now, that would be a modern support vehicle. But now, it's a machine that's two or three decades behind the times, and its armor doesn't matter anymore.
    1. 0
      11 July 2026 11: 31
      This machine should be modified so that it could automatically shoot down drones.
      Now, that would be a modern support vehicle. But now, it's a machine that's two or three decades behind the times, and its armor doesn't matter anymore.

      Agreed. And they need anti-neutron material there like a goat needs a button accordion!
      1. 0
        12 July 2026 11: 43
        Quote from Andy_nsk
        And anti-neutron material is as necessary there as a goat needs an accordion!

        Tomorrow, the Ukrainians will detonate a "dirty bomb" in the North-Eastern Front, and they'll need accordions...
        1. 0
          15 July 2026 13: 35
          A dirty bomb emits gamma radiation.
          1. 0
            15 July 2026 17: 18
            Quote from Andy_nsk
            A dirty bomb emits gamma radiation.

            I don't know what a dirty bomb does, but judging by the increasing escalation of mutual hatred among Europeans, the actual use of nuclear weapons is literally just a matter of minutes away.
  3. +5
    11 July 2026 05: 13
    The armor structure and dynamic protection system described in this article allow us to conclude that the BMPT Terminator's turret protection exceeds that of virtually all Soviet-era tanks. It can effectively resist both subcaliber projectiles and shaped-charge (HEAT) rounds, including tandem-charge munitions.


    The guns still need to be refined and equipped with projectiles with remote fuses. A 360-degree automatic UAV detection system with an automatic guidance system is also required, and a true tank support vehicle will emerge. A 45-degree vertical firing angle allows for effective engagement of UAVs; all that remains is to learn how to detect them, which is challenging, but possible.
    1. +1
      11 July 2026 05: 24
      Are you suggesting to put a helicopter radar in there or what?
      1. +4
        11 July 2026 05: 57
        Quote: Totor5
        Are you suggesting to put a helicopter radar in there or what?


        It's hard to say, but something seems to be needed for it to work effectively. If there's a radar with a range of 4-10 km and an optical target detection system, then something effective could be achieved. But is that even possible?
        1. +1
          12 July 2026 11: 46
          Quote from Eugene Zaboy
          It's hard to say, but something suggests itself.

          So far, the only thing that seems to be needed is the derivation of air defense into the combat formation of troops, both in the LBS and in the rear logistics and command areas. In short, we need a lot of them...
      2. +3
        11 July 2026 07: 02
        It doesn't have to be from a helicopter, it can be from a Pantsir-SMD.
        1. +2
          11 July 2026 07: 56
          What is this "anti-neutron material; - 21F -"?
          In the diagram of the dynamic protection "Relikt", two plates move away from each other when the explosive detonates, thereby slowing down the sub-caliber projectile, but if the projectile hits the plate at a right angle, then there is no braking?
          1. +5
            11 July 2026 08: 19
            Anti-neutron material (the same or similar materials were installed on Soviet tanks, and not only on Soviet tanks, in the form of linings and underlinings) is needed to weaken the neutron flux during a nearby nuclear explosion, to minimize the induced radioactivity of the vehicle's armor and reduce the risk of radiation injury to the crew.

            If a projectile hits a dz block at a right angle and it detonates, the impact of the plates on the projectile will be very weak. This also applies to shaped-charge projectiles.
          2. 0
            11 July 2026 14: 39
            This is an anti-nuclear lining.

            Reactive armor doesn't work well at right angles, so it's always at an angle. This makes it difficult to place on the sides. In the Kaktus, it's placed inside the boxes at an angle.
        2. +1
          11 July 2026 08: 02
          And you can also add Vitebsk to it, so you don’t have to get up twice.
        3. +2
          11 July 2026 18: 09
          Well then we need the missiles from the Pantsir-SMD, since the guns are ineffective and it will be the Pantsir-SPRDN
          1. -1
            12 July 2026 01: 40
            Perhaps the 30mm should be replaced with 57mm? Efficiency will immediately improve.
            1. +1
              12 July 2026 11: 50
              Quote: Ax Yeti
              Perhaps the 30mm should be replaced with 57mm? Efficiency will immediately improve.

              The transportable ammo will "fall." Again, both calibers of programmable detonation ammunition are needed. And we haven't heard much about them from the manufacturer, especially from the troops...
      3. +2
        11 July 2026 14: 25
        Are you suggesting to put a helicopter radar in there or what?

        Four passive microphones arranged in a pyramid can detect the azimuth, elevation, and distance to a drone. We simply measure the time difference between the sound arriving from the target and each microphone. Then we calculate the target's coordinates. A helicopter-type radar is possible, but will likely be overwhelmed by electronic warfare.
        1. 0
          11 July 2026 18: 08
          I think installing microphones on something as loud as a tank would be a real challenge; filtering out all that noise and gunfire would require a really powerful computer.
          1. 0
            14 July 2026 02: 25
            I think installing microphones on something as loud as a tank would be a real challenge; filtering out all that noise and gunfire would require a really powerful computer.

            In any case, you'll need a fairly powerful single-board computer like the Nvidia Jetson and an FPGA to determine the drone's coordinates. Firing is completely irrelevant. In any case, a Fourier transform is performed, along with a lot of other things. That is, the sound is separated into individual frequencies, and calculations are performed only on the relevant ones. Here, the limitation is more likely to be the number of targets and the quality of the digital microphones. It's not for nothing that high-quality digital microphones are banned from being sold in Russia. The initial conversion of the sound into frequencies is performed on a specially programmed FPGA (programmable logic integrated circuit), and then the Nvidia Jetson only works with drone sounds.
            1. 0
              14 July 2026 12: 00
              I don't know why it's so complicated. You can just stick lidars around the perimeter of a tank without worrying about noise. And it's much easier to clog a microphone, whereas with a lidar, you just have to wipe the lens with a cloth.
      4. +2
        11 July 2026 18: 07
        Why bother? The effective range is a couple of kilometers, so a millimeter-wave radar like the "Fara" or "Aistenka" will do, and for shooting down FPV, a lidar would be fine, at a range of a couple hundred meters.
  4. +3
    11 July 2026 09: 17
    How many APFSDS rounds has this dynamic armor repelled over 4,5 years of war? And how many tank HEAT rounds? Who does it protect against? Why is it so persistently being developed?
  5. +4
    11 July 2026 09: 41
    What percentage of the frontal projection area does this remarkable armor cover?
    And what is the probability of hitting this armor if the Terminator is suddenly shot at?
    I won't even mention the sides :(
    1. +1
      11 July 2026 11: 17
      What percentage of the frontal projection area does this remarkable armor cover?

      Honestly, no matter how much I examined the turret, I couldn't figure out where that remarkable armor is. Judging by everything, anything resembling ERA is only located near the turret ring under the guns. I don't see any well-angled armor on the turret at all... So, frankly, the whole article seems dubious. The initial information about the combat module's armor being similar to that of the BTR-82's combat module sounds more plausible.
      1. +3
        11 July 2026 11: 37
        I think I figured everything out.
  6. +1
    11 July 2026 12: 32
    Quote: agond
    and if the projectile hits the plate at a right angle, then there is no braking?

    Can you see in the diagram at what angles the DZ elements and armor plates are located?
    Where should one fire from and with what depression angles so that a desktop armor-piercing projectile (whether APFSDS or BKS) hits armor elements at normal angles?
    It is not so much the turret that is vulnerable, but its ring, sides and lower hull plate.
  7. +1
    11 July 2026 12: 40
    Everything is written very competently, thank you!
    But what is the relevance of this material?
  8. 0
    11 July 2026 14: 28
    Dear author!
    1. The combat module (not the turret!) of this vehicle is unmanned. Think about the three small hatches on top. They're not for the crew! The fighting compartment is located inside the vehicle's hull.
    2. The combat module doesn't need high protection, as the weak point is the externally mounted weapons. Armor won't help here.
  9. +2
    11 July 2026 18: 42
    Well, it's Spiridon—the dumbest name that will never catch on. A Terminator is a Terminator, no matter where you live. And that's enough on this topic.
  10. 0
    11 July 2026 21: 45
    The armament is virtually unprotected and, under current conditions, will likely not survive long enough to see use. The result is a heavy armored personnel carrier for five people.
  11. 0
    12 July 2026 07: 47
    If this resource has military-technical consultants, they should have brought the author's attention to the OBVIOUS inconsistencies in the article that are misleading the reader. I'm writing here for the first time because I can't remain silent. I've been reading this resource for a long time, and from now on, I'll be more critical of the information posted here.
  12. 0
    12 July 2026 14: 15
    What "Terminator"?! fool "Spiridon"! good soldier lol
  13. 0
    12 July 2026 19: 42
    It's been rightly noted that this vehicle no longer reflects the modern realities of drone warfare. A completely new, protected vehicle is needed that will detect and destroy drones.

    And the "naked" guns are a very questionable design decision. Any light drone would destroy them, and then the machine would become a useless hunk of metal. They could have hidden the gun barrels. And not just the barrels. The machine is too exposed for drones.
  14. 0
    14 July 2026 02: 39
    Quote from alexoff
    Why bother? The effective range is a couple of kilometers, so a millimeter-wave radar like the "Fara" or "Aistenka" will do, and for shooting down FPV, a lidar would be fine, at a range of a couple hundred meters.


    Millimeter radar will be suppressed for you in one fell swoop.

    Lidar for drones? In combat?

    Firstly, it won’t be cheap all around (look how much this joy costs on cars with autopilot: from $15,000 just for the sensors).

    Secondly, lidar only works in good weather (it becomes blind in smoke, fog, rain, and snowstorms).

    Thirdly, it is active - it emits light, which means it can be deceived or simply blinded.

    Fourthly, the most important thing is the coordination of sensors: Musk has a principled policy of not installing lidars on Teslas precisely because of the difficulties in coordination.