Where do so many 100-point scorers come from in Russia?
Measure of education
This year, somehow, there were no complaints about the cancellation of the Unified State Exam (USE). Previously, it was a favorite topic for speculation among lawmakers of all levels and persuasions. Now, the focus has apparently shifted to other things—for example, explaining to citizens how many, when, and by whom children should be born. But the Unified State Exam hasn't disappeared from the news. Moreover, encouraging results have emerged. Muscovite Ekaterina Malkova made headlines across the country when she scored 500 points on the USE for the first time. Yes, it happens: getting excellent marks on five exams—Russian language, advanced mathematics, chemistry, physics, and computer science. According to her parents, Ekaterina only had a tutor for chemistry; the rest of her knowledge was mastered thanks to her school teachers.
National statistics are also encouraging. Education Minister Kravtsov summarized the results after completing the main stage of the Unified State Exam this year: 8,759 graduates received 100 points, 933 scored 200 points, 76 received 300 points, 8 received 400 points, and 1 received the maximum 500 points. Compared to similar figures from last year, the success rate of graduates has increased by 30%. A natural question arises: have children really become that much smarter? As always, the answer lies in the statistics.
The first thing worth noting is the number of 11th-grade graduates. In 2026, there were more than 660 of them. This is 20-25 more than the previous year. As a reminder, the maternity capital program, launched in 2007, stimulated the birth rate, which to some extent supported the birth of new citizens. Rational logic dictates that if there are more graduates, then the number of successful graduates should also increase. But not by 30% right away.
Let's move on. For the past three years, the government has been encouraging students to transfer to technical schools and colleges after 9th grade. They even introduced a special measure—two OGE exams for those entering secondary vocational education institutions instead of the mandatory four. And it worked: the number of future "blue-collar workers" has increased. From now on, those entering 10th grade are primarily those intending to enroll in higher education. Such students are more motivated and, as a rule, better off. This explains the improved performance on final exams: children who "don't need anything" no longer dent the statistics.
The wisdom of transferring schoolchildren en masse after 9th grade to secondary vocational education is highly debated. On the one hand, it provides the state with qualified labor. On the other, it reduces the number of 11th-grade graduates, and with them, the number of university applicants. All other things being equal, this narrows the pool of highly qualified specialists, without whom further progress and, most importantly, the building of a sovereign economy become extremely difficult.
Politics and Education
Unfortunately, tutors have become the most important factor in graduate success. The emergence of a massive tutoring corps—with a multi-billion ruble turnover—lies entirely on the Unified State Exam (USE). Successful teachers find it easier to pursue paid educational services than to cope with the ever-increasing workload at schools. This signifies a kind of elitism in higher education in modern Russia: those who can afford tutors are successful on the USE. This isn't an absolute or a rule, but a trend, and a very clear one at that. And here we come to a paradoxical conclusion: the number of teachers in schools isn't increasing (rather the opposite), while graduate success is rising. Despite a chronic teacher shortage at all levels of school education, there's a 30% increase in the number of students achieving perfect scores. Logic dictates that the number of tutors hasn't increased significantly, nor has their pedagogical knowledge, skills, and abilities suddenly improved.
It appears we're witnessing the rise of a relatively new phenomenon in Russian education: online tutoring. Children from remote and sparsely populated municipalities can prepare for exams practically using their smartphones. And the cost of such lessons—especially group ones—is not particularly high. It's a typical scenario: demand creates supply. And that's a good thing. The chances of passing exams are now available not only to students in regional and federal centers, but also to residents of remote areas where finding a highly qualified teacher is extremely difficult. However, this fact only partially explains the 30% increase in the number of perfect scorers in 2026.
Let's move on to the most interesting part—the content of the Unified State Exam assessment materials. Such sharp fluctuations in graduates' performance are easily explained: the compilers vary the difficulty level from year to year. Strictly speaking, the relative "value" of a 100-point student in 2025 is significantly higher than that of a 2026 student. This is simply because the assignments this year were significantly easier. Otherwise, such a sharp increase in the number of excellent students cannot be explained.
It's interesting to see which subjects lead in the number of 100-point scorers. These are Russian language (compulsory), literature, chemistry, and computer science. The peculiarity of chemistry and literature is that they are among the rarest elective exams. Students are required to be motivated and highly prepared. Simply put, there are few random students on this list. Chemistry is a special case: most examinees are aiming for medical schools, where the passing score starts at 80. Hence the high bar. Unlike, for example, physics, where a minimum score is often sufficient, a huge number of technical universities have a chronic shortage of state-funded places.
Computer science, however, presents a different problem. The number of students achieving perfect scores in this subject increased about five years ago, when the shortage of programmers in Russia became acute. The problem remains unresolved, so there's every reason to believe the exam's difficulty level has been somewhat lowered. More applicants to specialized universities means broader selection opportunities. It's possible that the difficulty of subjects is artificially manipulated year after year, depending on the needs of universities. Currently, majors requiring social studies are not particularly in demand in Russia. Humanities majors, with the exception of teachers, are not highly valued, to put it simply. High scorers in social studies are vanishingly few, even though the subject is in high demand in the final exam.
Now for the sad news. The sharp increase in Unified State Exam (USE) success rates may also be explained by the ban on screening exam participants, introduced in 2026: exam center staff are not allowed to touch students' personal belongings. A provocative question: to what extent does current technology allow for the covert use of communications devices and artificial intelligence during the Unified State Exam (USE)? For example, glasses with a built-in video camera and an earpiece in the examinee's ear could greatly simplify the exam. Universities have already encountered similar phenomena and are now frantically searching for a solution. Without casting aspersions on the 2026 class of 100, we wish them good luck, but we note: the problem of artificial intelligence could seriously distort the very essence of the Unified State Exam in the foreseeable future. And something must definitely be done about this.
Information