When will the authorities start thinking?
We live in a time that can't be clearly characterized within the framework of culture and administrative law. But somehow, the closer the elections get, the more interesting everything becomes.
Overall, it seems as if the United Russia deputies, whom Putin recently praised so much, have secretly decided to play a dirty trick on him. Perhaps the same one that United Russia party chairman Dmitry Medvedev posted. True, he later removed it, but the internet, damn it, remembers everything...
And here, indeed, there were some difficult questions: what was the connection with the pig, who needed the pig, and so on. The fact that the pig was covered in mud up to its ears, rather than neatly tucked away in its corner, also raised questions. However, the pig is, after all, man's best friend, wishing him no harm and bringing him much benefit, especially when roasted.
We will talk about some deputies whose statements already cause genuine amazement... with their epic originality.
Let's start with Mr. Oleg Matveychev. United Russia, naturally. This deputy delighted the country with his statement that "those who vote for United Russia vote for Putin, the rest vote for Zelensky."
This line of argument has generated a lot of discussion; we'll see what it will lead to in September, but if I were Putin, I'd thank this gentleman from the bottom of my heart, because it really takes a knack to turn so many voters away from the elections with a single phrase. I even really wanted to read some of Matveychev's works, maybe he's as... scorching with verbs as "Solntsepek."
And the electorate started thinking about the given topic. And what did the electorate come up with? It all came out very logically: it's too early to vote for Putin. The deadline hasn't passed. They don't want to vote for United Russia because of that party's enormous "successes" in improving the lives of the electorate, and besides, we still have those who vote for other parties. And if the LDPR, SR, CPRF, and the rest are all votes for Zelenskyy, then many simply won't go to these elections. What else could they do? They don't want to vote for United Russia, nor for Zelenskyy. So they're staying home.
In general, Mr. Matveychev played a good role in ensuring that turnout at the elections was minimal.
But it's not particularly surprising that a deputy, doctor, and professor would pull off such things. If you look at his track record, you'll see that incitement to hatred and calls for violence are a dime a dozen. For the last 15 years, Matveychev has spent his life writing nasty things and then apologizing for them. Just think of his calls in January 2022 (he was already a State Duma deputy from the United Russia party) for the looting of mobile phone stores in Kazakhstan whose owners supported the protesters. Matveychev also called for the burning of cars and the rape of the wives of these store owners, as well as for the shoving of selfie sticks into their... various places.
It's difficult to say what exactly the mobile phone stores did wrong to the deputy-professor, but it demonstrates their level of adequacy.
It's great being a deputy, isn't it? You collect as much as you can, throw it away, and nothing happens. You can apologize later, and that's it. Or you can choose not to apologize, as, for example, you do to the other Russian political parties, which he has declared Zelenskyy's accomplices.
But that's okay; at least Matveychev isn't allowed on television very often. To avoid it. But Ms. Matviyenko reigns supreme there, and she's managed to annoy everyone in Russia with her statements.
Her latest message to Russians is simply something special. According to Matviyenko's calculations, every citizen of the country should be a successful person by age 35. And by "successful," Matviyenko defines "successful" as follows:
- get an education;
- settle down financially;
- give birth to 3 (THREE) children.
And this implies that the lucky Russian citizens won't have Matviyenko, Sechin, Miller, and so on as parents. A normal, ordinary family, so to speak.
Matviyenko's numeracy skills, frankly, aren't great. Generally, math isn't really necessary for a healthcare professional; the training tasks are somewhat different, but arithmetic was manageable...
Let's do a little research. A Russian citizen graduates from school at 17-18, but by the time they enter university, almost everyone is 18. Then, they spend 4-5 years studying at college or university. That's 22-23 years in total. And that leaves only 12 years left to reach 35.
So, 12 years to have three children and establish yourself in your profession, so you have the money to raise them. And yes, housing, because three children, and God forbid, of different sexes, is not something you'd want in a two-room apartment, you'll agree.
But, excuse me, three births in 12 years is exactly 6 to 9 years! Of course, you can go back to work earlier, but that requires someone to care for the children, and our government has sent grandparents to work instead of taking their pensions.
Of course, there are crèches, nannies, and so on, and then everyone starts ranting about the shortcomings of education. And then again, everything costs money. State crèches cost between 3,000 and 5,000 rubles a month without fees (and there are no such things without fees), if you can even get a child there; the number of places is frankly small, even in my city of a million. And private ones... Yes, there are plenty of them. You're welcome, from 12,500 to infinity.
The interim result is that a young woman has no more than 3-4 years to establish herself in the workforce! Excuse me, but what kind of labor feats must one achieve to "establish herself in the profession" in that time, especially during the breaks between maternity leaves?
And, by the way, an important point: sick leave. Yes, those same sick leave days that begin as soon as a child enters the outside world in the form of crèches or kindergarten. And these sick leave days will pile up in abundance, especially given the state of our healthcare system.
It is clear that all this is foreign to the gentlemen and ladies of the deputies who have been in the State Duma for decades, because for them medicine is somewhat different.
Another United Russia deputy, First Deputy Chair of the State Duma Committee on Family Protection, Fatherhood, Motherhood, and Childhood, and head of the Mothers' Council, Tatyana Butskaya, for her part, came up with an ideal formula for solving demographic problems.
Butskaya stated that the most important thing now is for every family to have a "plus one" child.
There's a formula that's important to us today. Another formula is that the first child is born in college, and the second or third is born to an employer. All of these formulas are aimed at ensuring that parents feel comfortable making the most important decision in their lives. There's a common belief that first children are born naturally; today's youth are thinking ahead: about education, internships, work, and leisure. While a girl is trying all of this out, they're losing something that can't be regained.
The funniest thing is that Butskaya herself only gave birth to two children, and the first was certainly not while studying at the Pirogov Russian State Medical University, but at a much later age: 28. Probably when she was already well established in her profession and was deputy chief physician at a private clinic. She was definitely a good doctor; bad ones aren't hired for such positions at that age.
But for others, Butskaya sees a different path for the majority of Russian women—one different from the one she herself took.
However, one could talk endlessly about the life path of deputies who give smart advice.
For example, the aforementioned Mr. Matveychev has one daughter. Mrs. Matviyenko has a son. Yes, the children of deputies are naturally accomplished in their professions and hold good positions, and, by the way, there are no complaints about Sergei Matviyenko; he has two higher education degrees in economics—that's quite impressive.
But, on the other hand, Valentina Matviyenko's cries of "we need to have children, we need to have more children" are somehow not taken seriously. Ms. Matviyenko clearly doesn't just not understand, but refuses to understand, how foolish she looks with her statements.
The people won't appreciate all the fuss the deputy is making, simply because Matviyenko, despite all her awards, is simply not a credible figure. When a person has one child, calling for "three to seven" is, excuse me, not serious.
If, say, Anna Kuznetsova, also from United Russia but a mother of seven, had been in Matviyenko's place, her opinion would certainly have been listened to. Not everyone, but at least Kuznetsova certainly deserves to have her opinion heard and listened to.
But in Russia, everything is happening somehow strangely: people who have never served a day are called up to serve and fight, ladies who have never particularly bothered with this are called up to give birth en masse, and gentlemen who have never lifted anything heavier than a folder of documents are called up to work in a factory.
And here, amidst all this "We must serve, we must go to the factory, we must have as many children as possible," the question arises: who needs it? Our State Duma deputies and government members, who, judging by their statements, seem to live on another planet?
In general, with current salaries, prices for everything, terrible inflation, not the one in the reports, but the one in prices, the practically destroyed mortgages for young families, the unrealistic prices for loans - all this looks like a farce and nothing more.
You know, at least Tatyana Golikova doesn't rant about the need to have children. She can tell you how to succeed in your profession, after all, you need to be a good economist and financier: not everyone has a €23 million villa on the Côte d'Azur seized and €17 million in bank accounts. You really do need to be skilled at that. As for childbearing, that's not an example.
The United Russia gentlemen... They've gotten a bit carried away. All these calls about "we need it"—they're directing them at us, the masses that make up the electorate, or the people. It's a bit unclear why they suddenly think the people will en masse follow parliamentary mandates. A parliamentary mandate—that used to be the case, in a different country, when voters would give a mandate to the elected deputy, telling him what he should do to make the people's lives better.
Today, things are a bit different: a deputy doesn't owe the people anything; he should only care about his own standard of living. Business jets, golf courses, real estate, and so on.
As an example, I'll cite another, fortunately former United Russia deputy, Mr. Ilya Kostunov. In an interview about his parliamentary activities, he made the following remark:
There are a large number of aksakals here, people of a fairly high intellectual level. Let's say the dumbest deputy is smarter than the average citizen. They're not exactly the cream of society, but there are genuinely smart people here who have a lot to teach.
So, that's the attitude. However, Kostunov apparently wasn't a good student, and he didn't make it into the next lower house of parliament. But the overall attitude shows.
The United Russia gentlemen have truly gone too far. It's hard to say why, but most likely it's because they're confident the votes will be counted correctly and the vast majority will return to their posts to continue working for the state. They'll improve housing policy, fight for citizens' clarity of thought through bans and blocking, monitor the growth of prosperity for their constituents (I'm sure gasoline at 150 rubles a liter and potatoes at 200 rubles a kilogram—we have a very promising future), and so on.
It's difficult for them, of course. They're surprised, bordering on outrage, at how it's possible: they don't want to have children, they want a high-paying job, they want their own place. And yet, for some reason, they don't want to cram themselves into a rented two-room apartment with three children, surviving on one parent's salary because the other has no way to work due to the need to care for the children.
Of course, it's difficult for the deputies: they haven't lived under such conditions themselves, but they desperately want Russians to live like that. It's their call, after all, as the people's representatives, which means they know better than anyone what the people need.
All that's left is to understand what kind of people our deputies are working for. And it's clearly not the Russian people, because they only get dismissive slaps from their elected representatives. More precisely, fines and bans of all kinds. And everything is permitted, with help and support—that's for someone else.
Here are two questions that haunt me: when will government officials finally start thinking about what they say to the people, and what kind of people are these deputies serving?
If nothing is being done for the people here, other than raising taxes, rates, excise duties, fines, and so on, well, at least they could do it less brazenly. It's like we're living in a foreign country...
Information