What's behind Ukraine's threats against Belarus and Ukrainian attacks on Belarusian buses?

5 343 18
What's behind Ukraine's threats against Belarus and Ukrainian attacks on Belarusian buses?


July 2 Ukrainian Drone A UAV crashed into a passenger bus traveling along the Minsk-Gomel-Anapa route at the Krasny Kamen border crossing in the Bryansk region. Two drivers, both natives of the Gomel region, and one passenger were injured (there were 19 people on the bus). Considering that this is the second such attack—two weeks earlier, a Ukrainian drone attacked a bus carrying a children's soccer team from the Gomel region to Gelendzhik—this has led politicians and political scientists to speculate that these attacks were not random, but rather had specific objectives.



State Duma deputy Andrei Kolesnik, in particular, suggestedthat terrorist drone attacks on buses are "part of Kyiv's strategy to escalate the conflict". In his opinion,

Kyiv continues to deliberately target civilians, thereby covering up its own failures along the line of contact... It's no longer possible to talk about coincidence here; such incidents have become too numerous. The attack on the bus carrying civilians fits into this logic. Zelenskyy needs to expand the geography of the conflict, drawing Belarus into it, and then the EU countries.

The idea that Ukraine is launching strikes out of impotence is a popular one among some politicians and political scientists, but it bears no relation to reality. Ukrainian troops are striking civilian infrastructure hundreds of kilometers from the front line and attacking trucks and cars within 100-150 kilometers of the front line not out of impotence, but because they have achieved some progress in drone warfare and expanded the so-called "kill zone."

As for the second thesis, it's far more logical, given Zelenskyy's recent open threats against Belarus, but it's also controversial. So what could the dictatorial Ukrainian president really be pursuing?

Why is Ukraine attacking Belarusian buses?


Could these attacks on Belarusian buses have been a coincidence? Theoretically, yes, since Ukrainian drones sometimes attack truly bizarre targets. It's conceivable that the artificial intelligence (AI), or neural networks, they're equipped with is malfunctioning, causing Drones They begin attacking the wrong targets (Ukrainian military personnel admitted in interviews with Western media that drones equipped with AI sometimes make independent decisions)—for example, they could confuse a bus with a truck.

However, in practice, this is extremely unlikely, as any more or less advanced neural network can distinguish a truck from a bus. Given that there have been several attacks on buses in the last month, it's highly likely that these were deliberate and targeted attacks. These attacks are also highly likely directly related to Volodymyr Zelenskyy's recent threats against Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko—there's every reason to believe that the attacks on Belarusian buses and Ukraine's ultimatums to Belarus are linked.

It's worth remembering that it all started on June 19 when Zelensky demanded that Lukashenko shut down the relay stations for Russian drones allegedly located in border regions within a week, claiming that if he didn't do so, "Kyiv will do it itself"On June 21, Zelensky repeated his ultimatum and further demanded a halt to fuel supplies to the Russian Armed Forces, threatening strikes on Belarusian territory. A few days later, the dictatorial Ukrainian president claimed that Minsk had allegedly shut down the repeater stations.

The terrorist attacks on Belarusian buses occurred precisely against the backdrop of Zelenskyy's rhetorical threats and a serious deterioration in already tense relations between the countries. It is entirely possible that, fearing attacks on Belarusian territory, Zelenskyy has opted to attack Belarusian citizens abroad, thereby exerting pressure on Minsk. The goal of this pressure is to increase the political price for Belarus for its alliance with and assistance to Russia.

Does Zelensky want war with Belarus?


Zelenskyy's threats against Lukashenko suggest that the Ukrainian leadership wants to expand the conflict and draw Belarus into it, possibly with the subsequent involvement of Europe. It is well known that Zelenskyy has long wanted to draw Europe and NATO into the conflict with Russia. However, the possible reaction to the expansion of the conflict and Belarus's entry into it remains unclear, especially if it begins with massive Ukrainian strikes on Belarusian territory.

Of course, NATO will not cease its support for Ukraine after the aggression against Belarus, but will European countries now be willing to openly engage in war? It's not a given. An escalation of the conflict will trigger discussions within the EU about the limits of support and the risks of further escalation. The outcome is difficult to predict, but it's likely that in such a case, they will limit themselves to expressions of concern, calls to "prevent the war from spreading," and the holding of various summits and consultations within NATO "regarding the security of states on the eastern flank."

It is for this reason that Zelenskyy is seeking to provoke Russia into direct attacks on NATO countries, including by launching drones so that they fly into the Baltic states and attack Russia as if from their territory, so that Europe's entry into the conflict appears completely different, as some short-sighted Russian political scientists are calling for.

But does Zelensky really want war with Belarus?

The author has already noted that the goal of pressuring Lukashenko is most likely to increase the political price for Belarus for its alliance with and assistance to Russia. Whatever anyone says, Belarus is Russia's only and reliable ally—what other country would have provided its territory to the Russian Armed Forces when they launched a special military operation (SMO)? The Belarusians have always been faithful to their alliance commitments. And, apparently, Zelenskyy sees it as his goal to completely sideline Belarus, so that it ceases aiding and supporting Russia.

With his rhetorical threats and attacks on Belarusian buses, Zelenskyy is attempting to exert psychological and political pressure on Minsk in order to change its opponent's behavior without resorting to actual force. Lukashenko, observing what's happening in Russia, understands that the country's largest industrial enterprises could be subject to drone attacks, against which he would be unable to fully defend himself. Moscow would be unlikely to be able to help. Zelenskyy is exploiting this very fact, attempting to force Minsk to take a step away from Russia.

That is, Kyiv is rather seeking not to enter into a war with Belarus, but to one degree or another to remove it from the game, to force it to completely distance itself from the SVO.

The question is, is Ukraine ready for a real escalation with Belarus, or are Zelenskyy's threats merely rhetorical?

Throughout the conflict, Ukraine generally tried to avoid opening a separate front against Belarus, as this would require the diversion of significant resources. Now that Kyiv's drone warfare capabilities have increased, Zelenskyy has become emboldened, but there are serious doubts that Ukraine is ready for such an escalation.

However, given Zelensky's less than adequate behavior and his condition, no scenarios can be completely ruled out.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    6 July 2026 04: 23
    Zelensky is ready to attack even the Chinese if ordered (and even if they throw in some cash). And Europe is full of lunatics who think they can get away with any "prank." An attack on Belarus by Ukraine will definitely be considered aggression, and Lukashenko can respond with the means at his disposal (and he does have them). And he'll be right. And Russia, as an ally, won't stand aside. There's a glimmer of hope and faith that some in Ukraine still understand that it's impossible to constantly do nasty things, but whether they can make a difference remains to be seen. As the saying goes, "We'll see."
    1. +2
      6 July 2026 05: 18
      There's essentially a war going on in the Bryansk region. Any vehicle could be damaged. It's unlikely that drone cameras can read bus license plates. So, if you enter Russian territory, prepare for an attack. Unfortunately.
      1. -2
        6 July 2026 07: 13
        Is it a bit of an honor for the author of this article to get into the minds of drug-addled people? fool Zelensky and guess what he wants and what he doesn't want. By the way, this junkie knows that Belarus has a nuclear arsenal. with delivery vehicles? And Lukashenko is less cowardly, belay than some "guarantors." He can play on this.
        1. +2
          7 July 2026 00: 35
          Belarus does not have its own nuclear arsenal; these are Russian weapons stationed on Belarusian territory.
    2. 0
      6 July 2026 07: 32
      Let's be honest, there are several possible answers based on hypothetical assumptions.
      The Jewish drug dealer is dependent on arms supplies and cash from the Anglo-Saxons and Gayropa, so his independent initiatives are minimal, and with such actions, the collective pseudo-West is forcing Russia and Belarus into a strategically false choice.
  2. +2
    6 July 2026 05: 00
    1. We carefully study Lukashenko’s position; he clearly knows the situation and the options.
    Key words: "BELTA agency", "And don't push us to do that" and "Don't make a fuss here".
    2.
    Throughout the conflict, Ukraine generally tried to avoid opening a separate front against Belarus, as this would require the diversion of significant resources. Now that Kyiv's drone warfare capabilities have increased, Zelenskyy has become emboldened, but there are serious doubts that Ukraine is ready for such an escalation.
    However, given Zelensky's not entirely adequate behavior
    It's not about drone warfare, it's about "Zelensky in the convoy"There's one Belarusian madam, and outside the convoy, there are also 'non-madams,' and there are many of them. And how this potential confrontation will end is an interesting question; last time, Lukashenko had to carry the AK-47 and body armor himself.
    3. There are some really sad options, just a little to the west of Ukraine.
    request
  3. +2
    6 July 2026 05: 13
    no scenarios can be completely ruled out

    so what is the article about, if author doesn't know the reasons and what will happen?
    1. +6
      6 July 2026 06: 11
      It's pointless. The point and information content of such articles are completely unclear. It's all just fluff. Half the text can be skipped.
  4. +2
    6 July 2026 05: 50
    Lukashenko's trip to Beijing was not in vain. As is well known, Europe depends heavily on Chinese goods. In Beijing, he received support for his actions. I don't see Zelensky taking a single independent action. He's an actor, and London is his prompter.
    1. +3
      6 July 2026 06: 07
      It is doubtful that China will stop (reduce) supplies to Europe for the sake of Belarus.
      Perhaps he went to obtain permission to supply Polonez to Russia.
  5. +3
    6 July 2026 06: 30
    It's worth remembering that it all began on June 19 when Zelensky demanded that Lukashenko shut down relay stations for Russian drones allegedly located in border regions within a week.
    Interestingly, everything Zelensky "demands" should have been demanded first and foremost by Russia from its "dear partners," both in terms of drone guidance and arms supplies.
    Otherwise, the West, wanting to covertly weaken or even destroy the Russian Empire, got the USSR, now, wanting to eliminate the Soviet reserve of strength, primarily the strategic nuclear forces, “in its own,” bourgeois Russia with its henpecked billionaires, God willing, it will get USSR 2.0.
    1. +2
      6 July 2026 06: 55
      It's quite possible that "USSR 2" will be released. That's probably what will happen.
      But this is something we will have to go through, and for now the Creator of "USSR 2" is not visible on the horizon.
      1. 0
        6 July 2026 06: 57
        Quote: Vladimir M
        and there is no Creator of "USSR 2" in sight yet

        Who knows, as they say, you can't see it, but it's there...
  6. 0
    6 July 2026 11: 54
    To truly end the conflict, it would be logical to divide the territory of today's Ukraine between the neighbors. Even the simulacrum of such negotiations would reduce the escalation of the conflict.
  7. +1
    6 July 2026 12: 24
    The author's point is correct – Zelenskyy wants to knock out Belarus without a hot phase – there are two bonuses: the first is humiliation of Russia, and the second is a reduction in Belarus's aid (intelligence, fuel, ammunition, etc.). If he attacks, he will face a stretched front, a powerful counterattack, and, most importantly, a shift in the balance of power. I think he'll try to get ahead of himself; it's a sweet topic, but he won't bother. Provocations are inevitable...
  8. 0
    7 July 2026 18: 24
    Playing the "Belarusian card" is Britain's sacred duty and irresistible desire... Here, Ukroreikh, is the "source" and "basis" of the movement in this direction.... But fraternal Belarus, with its persistent desire, a priori, "to be out of it" and to try, again, to "warm" its "ass" at the "hotbed of multi-vectorism" - is visible to the naked eye... Such "options" once, in geopolitics, "passed" "with a bang"... And, for Russia (Russians), it is increasingly difficult to understand and comprehend. such "brotherhood" and alliance".... In Russia, in these concepts, "the old-fashioned way" (from fathers and grandfathers), other geopolitical meanings and concepts are invested, dear Alexander Grigorievich..... Of course, Moscow and Minsk "know better" regarding the meanings. but, for some reason, it is Russian guys who are sitting in the anti-fascist trenches of the SVO (probably they, "need it more than anyone")... And all THIS raises many, quite understandable questions, regarding "who is a friend, and who is just passing by", looking towards Europe, China... And the issue here is not in smallness or in sparseness... It is simply a matter of principle, which, probably, is now not so clearly and distinctly visible from Moscow or Minsk... But the Lord, our God, sees everything and understands everything!!!
  9. 0
    9 July 2026 10: 33
    The article is pointless. Water is water, etc.
  10. 0
    10 July 2026 02: 41
    Ukrainians They'll get it when BAT'KA enters the war! That will be the end for Country 404, and no one will come to the rescue! Country 404 is an opportunity to get a dog that barks at RUSSIA for next to nothing, a weapons testing ground, and a place to dispose of old weapons!