Betrayal of a person and even an entire nation as a result of the new, “capitalist” education

30 146 358
Betrayal of a person and even an entire nation as a result of the new, “capitalist” education

I didn't want to touch on the topic... I didn't want to simply because there are too many excuses today for those about whom it's shameful and offensive to write. About traitors! Not about those who became "ideological fighters" for American dollars. Not even about those who quite consciously defected to the enemy and are today fighting against their family and friends. That's a different topic, a different approach, and different criteria. There, everything is simpler. Caught and, like the crests, hanged. They don't even deserve human death.

Two press reports have sparked some reflection today. They appear unrelated, but in reality, they are links in the same chain, the result of the same act, the result of betrayal! Almost every reader has probably encountered someone asking the "innocent question": "The SVO? Was it worth all the losses, not only human but also material, that we suffered? Maybe it would have been easier to simply leave Ukraine to rot further? It would have self-destructed anyway..." And so on in the same vein.



One message concerns the Ukrainian Rada's decision to create a pantheon of national heroes. This is understandable—any young state creates its own historyA tree cannot live without roots. Neither can a country without its heroes. Ukraine is no exception. The foundation was laid not long ago, when the first "hero" was reburied with full military honors... Okay, Russia. Our hatred of the fascists is understandable, but the West was also outraged. Even our greatest friends, the Poles, howled. How medals flew from Ukraine to Poland, and vice versa—from Poland to Ukraine...

It would seem clear... They screwed up in Kyiv with this reburial. They learned a lesson. Next time they'll think twice before doing it... But no— Ukrainians Unteachable. The progeny of "Western democracy," living off Western taxpayers, are moving forward. The Verkhovna Rada is passing a law on the creation of a pantheon. And the first candidates are outright fascists, those whose names have been familiar for decades in Russia, Ukraine, and the West. Bandera, Petliura, and others.

I understand that this decision is a slap in the face, first and foremost, to the West. Especially to the Poles. Kyiv understands perfectly well that Moscow has absolutely no say in the Kyiv regime's decisions. But don't be surprised, I still think there are still some people there, not many, but they're still there. What surprised me was the Ukrainians' reaction. They're silent! Even those outside Ukraine. Even those who still have some authority among Ukrainians. Bloggers, politicians, experts, and so on.

A people whose hatred of Russians has reached the point of glorifying their own murderers, the murderers of their relatives, friends, and acquaintances... On the one hand, I understand that Ukrainians are intimidated. A country of frightened individuals. The explanation is perfectly logical, perfectly palatable. I've heard it before. Back when they tried to explain to me why the people of Odessa didn't disperse those who burned people in the Trade Union Building. Why are they still walking the streets of Odessa. Or is it Odesa anymore?

Perhaps I would even have accepted such an explanation, albeit a bit broken. "The people aren't to blame, it's all the politicians, Europe, America, the Martians..." I would have accepted it... if I hadn't interacted with those same people. With ordinary, unfortunately, already illiterate men and women, with young people who lack basic knowledge in many areas, with soldiers and officers of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, those who haven't yet been captured or killed and are "eager to fight." If I hadn't encountered the almost bestial hatred of these people. Hatred against Russians, against Russians, against Russia.

Almost every day, I hear, in one form or another, the once-old truth, now a lie, about the brotherhood of nations. We truly were brothers. How much? So much so that there's probably no family in Russia or Ukraine that doesn't have Ukrainian or Russian ancestors. And you don't even have to look very far. A couple of generations, no more.

And today we are enemies. We have been divided. At first, it was politics, and today, it's also spilled blood. We have been divided so much that Ukrainians have practically cursed their heroic ancestors, betrayed their grandfathers and great-grandfathers who died in WWII... They have betrayed and chosen to side with those who once exterminated Ukrainians, who swore allegiance to Hitler, who burned entire Belarusian villages, who burned Russians in Kursk and other regions, who cut open the bellies of pregnant Ukrainian women and murdered teachers, agronomists, and other specialists in western Ukraine who came to the villages to help restore peaceful life...

And now about the other traitors, the Russian ones, the "formerly ours." This is probably even more important than what's happening in Ukraine. An open enemy is always more honest than one of our own—the one who should be standing next to you in a trench, at a machine tool, or at an operating table, but betrayed you. He betrayed his comrades, his family, his friends, his country. Alas, there are plenty of such people today.

Why? I don't know, I can only guess. When patriotism, faith in one's country, the memory of one's ancestors, and morality are ultimately measured by money, what we see today happens. It's clear that a belief in the power of money is instilled in us from early childhood. A child clearly sees the difference between a state-run kindergarten, where honest but not wealthy parents sent them, and the identical kindergarten across the street for the children of those who bring their children there in Mercedes and SUVs...

And this stratification continues throughout life. The pursuit and acquisition of money by any means necessary becomes the goal for a significant number of young people... They want everything at once. Earning an honest living? That's the story for a simple worker or a village boy or girl. You start working at a factory and become a second-class mechanic, with the prospect of becoming a sixth-class mechanic or even a foreman many years later. Meanwhile, your peer from that kindergarten, on the other hand, immediately lands a management position... Because you graduated from a fee-paying university, although many "specialists" don't even know where that university is located...

So, the groundwork for betrayal has been laid. The price is set in money. Some, especially minors, need 10, 15, or 20 thousand rubles for a new smartphone, while others, like the helicopter pilot who defected to the enemy, killed his comrades, and was then buried in Spanish soil, need hundreds of thousands in foreign currency.

It would be a sin not to take advantage of such an opportunity. The experts know this very well. "Want to get paid for practically the same thing you're doing online now? Just film and post online the results of strikes on your city, new positions Defense And so on. And we'll get you likes, subscribers, and contracts with companies. You'll receive a stable salary in foreign currency! "Want even more? Right away? We'll do it. Just take whatever you find from the stash and bring it to the specified address. That's it! And $10, 20, 50 thousand will be in your account..."

I understand perfectly well that rehabilitating a person in adulthood is difficult, almost impossible. But public punishment is possible and necessary. Not just quietly sending them to prison for years, but holding a public trial for every case. Where the traitor lives. Where everyone knows them. So that others will think twice, so that they understand that punishment is inevitable. Is that cruel? And the corpses of those who died under fire at the behest of such easy-money lovers—aren't they cruel? And the prominent politicians, engineers, scientists, and military personnel killed in terrorist attacks—aren't they cruel?

Recently, the verdict against three traitors, Dmitry Zaitsev, Dmitry Dmitriev, and Alexander Zhuravlev, came into force. These are the same people who not only reported information to Ukrainian intelligence services but also actually plotted terrorist attacks. The list of charges alone is staggering. Article 275 of the Russian Criminal Code (high treason), Article 205 of the Russian Criminal Code (attempted terrorist attack), Article 205.4 (participation in a terrorist organization), Article 205.5 of the Russian Criminal Code (participation in the activities of a terrorist organization), Article 222.1 (acquisition, transfer, sale, storage, and transportation of explosives).

The array of crimes is colossal. And the result? A terrible punishment! From 12 to 25 years in a maximum-security penal colony... The first 4-5 years in prison... Is that enough? I understand that some will accuse me of bloodthirstiness. "The author hasn't been in prison and doesn't know what it's like." I truly don't know, or rather, I only know from stories. Do the authors of such comments know what it's like to be killed in your car in a peaceful city? Do they know what it's like to be wounded after a blast?

Plans for terrorist attacks, IEDs for explosions—isn't that enough to understand that these are beasts, ready to kill the defenseless? Or isn't correspondence with Ukrainian intelligence agencies enough to understand that these aren't lost sheep, but wolves? Money, post-action evacuation plans, promises of European citizenship, and so on... Are these just words?

I won't dispute the severity or leniency of the sentence. Although I do believe that, given the conduct of the Special Military Order, such crimes should be tried under martial law. My point is different. How many readers knew about this sentence? How many of these ghouls' fellow countrymen and neighbors knew about the trial? How many federal media outlets published materials on this matter?

We've been fighting longer than our grandfathers did during the Great Patriotic War. It's safe to say that, just like then, there's not a single family left in the country where a relative, friend, or acquaintance isn't participating in the fighting or "forging victory in the rear." But beyond the nation's great unity against the threat of a resurgence of European fascism, we must also acknowledge the increasingly visible rift between those who are willing to give their lives for Russia and those who call their homeland the place where they are best fed, or at least promised to be.

We shouldn't even talk about betrayal openly anymore; we should shout it out. In every case, we must shout it out so that every citizen of the country can hear. And there's no need to fear that this shouting will undermine the unity of the people or embitter anyone. Rotten trees will never decorate your garden. Rotten people will not decorate the country!
358 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 81
    6 July 2026 04: 56
    I'll digress a bit from the article's topic—it's only alluded to in passing. The problems are much deeper: the statements of some of our politicians often seem worse than the most Russophobic ones out there. When people are asked about fuel, these forum members openly joke and laugh. I stood in line for an hour on Friday in the heat, without air conditioning, and I wasn't in the mood for laughing, while behind me stood a similar crowd of "lucky ones." What can you even talk about when one instruction is given, and then you can simply take it back? They approved Euro-3, but if your car breaks down, that's your problem. High inflation—your problem, high prices—your problem. I have to navigate this world as best I can while also solving problems of national importance: improve demographics, improve the economy, pay taxes, and so on. But instead of help and real action that would improve the situation, I get all sorts of blockages, taxes, and other pleasures of life. And, most interestingly, I also owe everyone around me, even though I think I don't owe anyone anything anymore. And here we are discussing traitors. Betrayal is spitting in the people's faces for over 30 years, robbing them, and destroying them. They're doing well there, so they can afford to laugh out loud. But we need to work, try to raise the country, and if there's no help, at least don't interfere...
    1. + 44
      6 July 2026 05: 13
      Betrayal is spitting in the people's faces for more than 30 years, robbing them and destroying them.

      That's why they betrayed, to rob and destroy at the behest of whose interests they betrayed...
      1. + 30
        6 July 2026 08: 08
        "State ideology is prohibited by the Constitution" © V.V. Putin

        Well, a holy place abhors a vacuum, and the unspoken ideology of "for money - yes" dominates society, so why be surprised by traitors, the number of prostitutes, corruption, etc.?
        1. + 65
          6 July 2026 09: 13
          At the same time, we mustn't forget another aspect. For thirty years, we've been hammered home this simple truth almost daily: the state owes us nothing. There's no money, but hang in there, you can live on pasta, we didn't ask you to have children—I think the whole country remembers these principles. Citizens must pay taxes and levies—that's where their relationship with the state ends. All services are paid for, in one form or another.

          But then the white arctic fox came along, and it suddenly became clear that we actually owed the state something! Even though it hadn't given us anything! It had only taken. And while the older generation, raised under the USSR, understood this, some of the younger generation inevitably asked the logical question: where did this debt come from? If the state doesn't owe us anything, then why the hell did we owe it? When did we manage to do so, and how? And from there, alas, it's not far to the appropriate conclusions.

          So, the bourgeoisie is now reaping the fruits of their years of labor in cultivating a new capitalist outlook. In which the only measure of anything is money, and only money. You wanted this yourself—so why are you outraged and surprised now?

          Well, today's so-called elite doesn't exactly offer us examples of patriotism, does it? If that's what they are, what can we expect from the people? In the old days, the sworn communists and their children considered it their sacred duty to defend the Soviet Motherland. Even before that, for a long time, it was simply impossible for a nobleman to lose his honor by avoiding military service in difficult times. And today's? What kind of example are they setting? That's just it. Hence the widespread opinion: you stole everything from us, so defend it. It's logical. The district committee is closed, everyone has gone to the front—can you imagine such a sign on the branch of any of today's so-called parties?

          Once the Soviet generation passes away, everything will get even worse. And while we managed to pass on even a fraction of those ideals to our children, I doubt we'll be able to do the same to our grandchildren. With all the consequences...

          As the saying goes, like the priest, like the parish. Before criticizing the people for their supposed lack of patriotism, the elite would do well to first take a look at themselves. And ask themselves: what are you doing for the people and the state?
          1. + 15
            6 July 2026 12: 13
            I'll note that the motivational program for citizens' behavior is established through ideology, and in practice, no one has actually abolished it. It's just that, when a social system changes, the old ideology is implicitly replaced in society by political "reformers" of the new ruling class through upbringing and education—in accordance with the law of the "Overton window." Specifically,

            Ideological education in the Russian Federation has long been "sour". The bourgeois ideology of the American economist M. Friedman, dominating in the country, is no longer called “bourgeois”, but is called abstractly class-based simply “market” with elements of the so-called. "monetarism" (i.e. bourgeois pursuit of financial profits).
            In this case, you can not equalize the concept of real capitalism with all its flaws with the doctrinal idea of ​​the American Milton Friedman in the form of a speculative social project, put into practice, to build supposedly perfectly fair capitalism on Earth around the world. Due to what?
            Due to the alleged existence in the world of some anarchist, absolutely “free” world market of capital, goods (services) and labor from everyone and everything, which is supposedly absolutely "free" from profanation and dishonesty, both on the part of the participants in the capital, goods (services), and labor markets themselves, and from the pressure exerted upon them by the national state. And yet, Friedman naively assumes that all state-free market participants are, at all times, equal in their beginnings and can always become rich, should they so choose. This is pure utopia and bluff!
            Behind this attempt by Friedman to whitewash capitalism lies a very definite goal taken by Washington's apologists. Namely.
            Purpose of this american bluff is that the sovereign countries "indigenous" for the United States, without control and duty-free by their governments, mistakenly, free and defenseless from competition, open access to their domestic markets for US multinational companies for the sale of foreign goods and the purchase by foreigners of "indigenous" wealth, enterprises and natural resources. resources.
            In this case, the reduction of native state property to the maximum - to "0" - is promoted by the "market people" exclusively as a public good. For the state supposedly does not need to control anything, there is no need to punish anyone, and there is no need to regulate trade and production either. That at the same time all members of society will become such honest and law-abiding entrepreneurs that therefore it will no longer be necessary to protect the population from swindlers, thieves, robbers and murderers. And therefore, the alleged national state, as an anachronism, will disappear by itself as unnecessary, and there is no need to defend it at all. For the distribution of material goods "from above" at the state level is not required, because everything will be regulated by this "ideal" capitalist market. But those who did not fit into the market are already their problems. Let, they say, they survive on their own, as they can. These include in particular all the so-called. "superfluous" people: pensioners, disabled people, children, etc. - all those who "did not fit into the market." But they should be "happy" with their freedom from the centuries-old, fattening abstract-bureaucratic state, which has always been dreamed of by the anarchists for centuries.

            TOTAL All this Milton Friedman ideology about the alleged existence of a so-called "free" and "clean" market in the world is an anarchist propaganda of the American establishment to decompose the national security of sovereign states to their complete liquidation and subordination of their resources in favor of US transnational companies.
            Unfortunately, this ideology unofficially adopted by the Russian ruling elite as a state ideology. It is implemented in practice by the government of the Russian Federation, the guarantor of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, in the State Duma and the Federation Council. And the HSE is the forge of bourgeois young cadres in this comprador economy and its apologists.
          2. + 26
            6 July 2026 13: 34
            There's no money, but hang in there, you can live on pasta. We didn't ask you to have children - I think the whole country remembers these points.
            I will add one more thesis: “we did not send you there.”
            Hello Paul!
            1. + 10
              6 July 2026 14: 16
              And to you - hi

              Yes, I forgot this famous thesis.
            2. + 10
              6 July 2026 21: 13
              You forgot about two more theses:
              - a reduction factor when calculating military pensions;
              - the government's refusal to index military personnel's pay in 2012-2017 and 2024, as enshrined in law through laws amending the relevant budgets.
            3. + 12
              6 July 2026 22: 10
              You also forgot: "Teachers don't have money - go into business."
            4. + 10
              6 July 2026 22: 35
              Quote: 3x3zsave
              [i]There is no money, but you hang in there, you can live on pasta, we didn’t ask you to give birth - .............. “we didn’t send you there.”
              can add
              turn off electricity for the poor at night
              the discussion was about the Altai Territory
          3. -2
            7 July 2026 15: 30
            Well, in that case, a question arises. For example, during the war of 1812, a mass of common people—uneducated, oppressed, paying taxes or working corvee labor, spending their entire lives in poverty—suddenly took up the cudgel of a people's war. And they stood side by side with their centuries-old oppressors—the counts and princes. And they didn't ask questions like, "What did you do, Prince Bolkonsky, for me personally?"
            What happened in 1812? Did the priest and his parish change?
            1. +2
              7 July 2026 19: 38
              "And he didn't ask any questions like, 'What are you, Prince Bolkonsky, doing this personally for me?'
              What happened in 1812? Did the priest and his parish change?
              The peasants who lived then could have answered this question. Now, historians and propagandists are answering. Each group has its own answer. In Crimea, sugar costs 80 rubles per kilogram in Simferopol, and from 100 to 115 rubles in a village near Yevpatoriya. I bought it today; in Bolkonsky's time, conditions were different, and so was the attitude toward life. Horses needed oats, not gasoline.
              1. -4
                8 July 2026 08: 20
                In Bolkonsky's time, my dear fellow, peasants would hang a lump of sugar on a string and drink tea (which they themselves collected) while looking at it. And not everyone had horses. And the standard of living of a common peasant in the early 19th century wasn't even close to that of Russian citizens, whether they lived in Yevpatoria or the Urals.
                1. +2
                  8 July 2026 13: 23
                  "In Bolkonsky's time, my dear, peasants would hang a lump of sugar on a thread and drink tea (which they themselves collected) while looking at it."

                  I'm lucky, I remember sugar being sold for a ruble. That was under Brezhnev, though. You, "Dearest," forgot to describe the mammoth hunting days, when there was no sugar back then. I think you can do it.
                  1. -3
                    8 July 2026 13: 39
                    What do mammoths have to do with it? And Bolkonsky's time is directly relevant to the dispute. I gave this example for one reason. How much sugar can you buy with your monthly income? You were crying about how expensive everything was. But a peasant in the 19th century saved on every scrap. The conclusion is that modern Russian citizens live in clover compared to those who stood up as one to defend the Fatherland. And no one mentioned sugar prices in Yevpatoria or Simferopol. Instead, they grabbed pitchforks and axes and joined the militia. So it's not the sugar prices that matter, but the people?
                    1. +4
                      8 July 2026 20: 26
                      "You were shedding tears here, how expensive everything is)))"

                      Forgive me, "Dearest," for tearing you up, although I don't understand how anyone can shed tears over the internet, or, oh my God, maybe that's just a figure of speech. About sugar again, I went to two other stores; one was 120 rubles/kg, the other 139 rubles/kg. So, you advise the owners to join the militia, but three years ago, Wagner told me they don't take such old guys. And the longer the SVO lasts, the more propagandists there are.
                      1. -2
                        9 July 2026 14: 42
                        Well, I'm not a propagandist. After all, I served 25 years in the Russian Navy. And my son serves in the Air Defense Forces. The only thing I don't understand is why you're so upset about the price of sugar. Prices are the same here in Yaroslavl. I bought Russian sugar for 135 rubles on the weekend. Granulated sugar is cheaper. A pack lasts me two or three weeks.
                      2. +2
                        9 July 2026 16: 15
                        "Well, I'm not a propagandist. After all, I served 25 years in the Russian Navy. And my son serves in the Air Defense Forces. The only thing I don't understand is why you're so upset about the price of sugar."
                        You'll be surprised, but there are plenty of propagandists in the Navy, too. But if you have a son serving in the North Atlantic Military District, you wouldn't write about peasants with pitchforks who didn't need anything from the Tsar, even their own pitchforks. A friend's son recently left for a prosthetic leg replacement, and his leg ended up somewhere in Ukraine. God forbid something similar happens to your son. I wish him success and good health.
                      3. -1
                        9 July 2026 21: 08
                        My son is an officer. And it is his duty to serve the Motherland, which has given everything to both him and me. Some lose a leg, others their life.
                        Peasants with pitchforks? They had next to nothing, and yet they went to war. They had no apartments, no cars, no sugar, your favorite sugar. And yet they went anyway. And today there are those who remember sugar and buckwheat, even though they have an apartment, a car, and an education, which the country also provided... They just don't remember Article 59 of the Constitution, which states that it is the duty and responsibility of every citizen to defend the country.
                    2. +3
                      8 July 2026 21: 46
                      "The conclusion is that the modern Russian citizen is living in clover compared to those people who, as one, stood up to defend the Fatherland."

                      The lights came on. I'll try to be brief. My dear, first learn the basics of the history of the War of 1812. The peasant war with pitchforks and axes was organized by Alexander I, who issued a manifesto on July 6, 1812, according to which landowners were to train their servants as a militia. These militia units fought the French, but sometimes they also smashed their own landlords. References to 1812 are good because the state tells you to pick up your pitchforks and go to the North-East. The state owes you nothing, except perhaps to cite examples of the heroic valor of your ancestors and urge you to emulate them.
                      1. -2
                        9 July 2026 17: 01
                        My dear, I can teach you military history. Because I studied it for three years at the Higher Naval Academy. And I passed exams every year. The manifesto of Alexander I you mentioned concerns the formation of a people's militia and applies only to serfs. Here, yes, every nobleman in a hundred had to contribute two or three men. But merchants, free peasants (and by 1812, these constituted about 40% of the entire peasant population), and townspeople joined the militia voluntarily. Moreover, they armed themselves with voluntary donations. So the thesis you're trying to push here, that the state forced everyone into the militia with sticks, is nothing more than a figment of your imagination. Moreover, partisan detachments were formed in the occupied territories, and no manifesto could have forced them into them. Typically, these units included people of varying social status, who by fate had found themselves in the captured territories. And even under duress, mass popular participation in this war simply could not have occurred. Otherwise, there would have been no partisan movement or such a diverse people's militia.
                        The state doesn't owe anything.
                        In Russia, 80% of the population lives in privatized housing. Moreover, 50% received it free of charge, back in the Soviet era, and it was passed on to their descendants by inheritance. The state provides its citizens with the opportunity to work, creating jobs in both the public and private sectors, charging them a 13% personal income tax (one of the lowest taxes in the world; in the US, citizens pay around 30% or more, depending on the state and income). The state enables citizens to purchase goods, both domestic and foreign, by regulating this market. The state provides free secondary education to citizens, and even higher education is sometimes free. My daughter is studying at Moscow State Linguistic University (formerly Maurice-Thérèse University) on a state-funded spot, having passed her final exams with flying colors and her entrance exams with equal success. She was a good student, which is why she was accepted into one of the state-funded spots in the English, French, and German department. Promising))) will be the translator during Major Khvat's interrogation of captured Europeans in the coming war)))
                        In general, the state, far from owing nothing, provides citizens with a comprehensive range of services and social benefits from birth to burial. But what about the citizen? In exchange for the opportunity to enjoy these benefits, the citizen is obligated to obey the laws. Including the most important of these—the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and particularly Article 59, which states that the defense of the Fatherland is the duty and obligation of the citizen.
                        It's just not looking good. You drank well, ate well, earned enough to buy a car, own property, surf the internet, use public transportation, social benefits... And then the SVO came and took off through Verkhniy Lars.
                      2. +2
                        11 July 2026 11: 49
                        Quote: Leontrotsky
                        Because I studied it for three years at the Higher Naval Academy. And I took exams every year.

                        You have some kind of military history specialty. We had military history for two semesters in our second year and that's it...
                      3. 0
                        12 July 2026 21: 46
                        We also studied the naval aspect of this subject. And our admirals probably understood better that a commander's knowledge of historical precedents is a treasure trove for use in a potential military confrontation.
                      4. 0
                        17 July 2026 10: 24
                        In 1913, my brother and I distinguished ourselves
                        In the thirtieth Jaeger, and then in the forty-fifth
                        On the third of August, we settled in a trench;
                        It was given to him with a bow around my neck.

                        (Skalozub in Woe from Wit)
                      5. 0
                        Today, 12: 56
                        А Ваше в чем отличие, милый друг?
                        Из классиков здесь приводить цитаты?
                        Подобные, пусть в рифму, эскопады,
                        Не разорвут порочный, грустный круг.
                        Ты не служил.. Не состоял.. И не был..
                        Но брал от жизни, что дала страна,
                        До Ларса Верхнего проворным зайцем бегал,
                        Лишь слухи поднялись что близится война.
                        Но бант тебе мы все равно повяжем))
                        Не только Скалозубам их носить,
                        Румян, как гимназистка, напомажен,
                        Отчизну только так не полюбить.
                        Что сделал ты, в тяжёлую годину?
                        Что отдал ты на благо всей страны?
                        Явить что можешь обществу и миру?
                        Здесь тиская заемные стихи...
            2. +1
              8 July 2026 06: 51
              And stood side by side....
              And now there is no other "side." He has a second citizenship.
              1. -3
                8 July 2026 08: 30
                Who has a different citizenship? In the 19th century, the Russian nobility even spoke French. They owned estates in France, and many lived there for considerable periods. And this didn't stop the entire country from rising.
            3. 0
              13 July 2026 21: 56
              ...the storm of 12 has arrived. Who helped us here?
              The people's fury, Barclay, winter or the Russian god?
              But God helped, the murmuring became lower and soon, by force of events, we found ourselves in Paris and the Russian Tsar, the head of Tsars...
      2. -15
        6 July 2026 13: 08
        That's why they betrayed, to rob and destroy at the behest of whose interests they betrayed...
        Can you give me some specifics? Do you have any names? Well, if you're going to go on like this, give me some specific names. You probably know, right? laughing
        1. + 21
          6 July 2026 15: 35
          Can you give some specifics? Do you have any names?

          What more specifics do you need if, since the USSR, the country has been plundered, both by domestic bourgeois and by the West? The West destroyed the USSR in order to get its hands on our wealth...
          The names are Rothschild, Rockefeller, Soros, and other Morgans... And domestically, type a list of Russian billionaires into a search engine, and there you have the names...
          1. -15
            6 July 2026 15: 46
            The names are Rothschild, Rockefeller, Soros, and other Morgans... And domestically, type a list of Russian billionaires into a search engine, and there you have the names...
            Dear sir, don't lecture me on political literacy, okay? Can you specifically name the **Russians* or similar?
            1. + 11
              6 July 2026 15: 53
              Don't teach me political literacy, okay?

              Where did you see political literacy? I only voiced what was visible to the naked eye...
              There's probably no need to mention the names of the oligarchs; they've been around for about 20 years now...
              1. -6
                6 July 2026 15: 57
                There's probably no need to mention the names of the oligarchs; they've been around for about 20 years now...
                And will you name Putin? And his buddy Rotenberg? laughing
                1. + 21
                  6 July 2026 16: 01
                  Will you name Putin? And his buddy Rotenberg?

                  You see, you know the names yourself, otherwise you keep pestering me with "name them, name them"...
                  1. -10
                    6 July 2026 16: 11
                    otherwise they pestered “name it, name it”...
                    I didn't pester you, mind you! hi
                    1. +6
                      7 July 2026 00: 47
                      Quote: ArchiPhil
                      otherwise they pestered “name it, name it”...
                      I didn't pester you, mind you! hi

                      What difference does it make? You'll all be going to the Mordovian resorts together anyway. The serfs have really gone wild, haven't they, Comrade Major?
            2. +3
              7 July 2026 23: 50
              What kind of names are needed? Abramovich. Doesn't live in Russia. Neither do his seven children. Mikhelson. One wife in London, the second with their second child in Spain. The Shtengelovs - Australia. The Strukovs - Switzerland... What is this anyway? Isn't this robbing the country and transferring capital abroad, where it is happily spent to the delight of local "partners"?
          2. 0
            13 July 2026 21: 58
            political defeat always means economic defeat.
            And the subsequent bankruptcy and collapse of capitalization / currency and GDP /
            and further privatization at minimum cost with the creation of a political infrastructure for all this.
    2. +9
      6 July 2026 06: 25
      Speaking of gas, the last elevator broke down on Saturday evening. We called and were told the repairmen were busy, but the request was still pending. I wasn't born yesterday, and I remember that the repairmen usually arrived within half an hour of calling. So, I think, this is my guess, the repairmen simply don't have gas. They'll be able to fill up and come and fix it. In the meantime, we'll just be jumping with parachutes.
      1. man
        -3
        6 July 2026 07: 24
        Quote: Gardamir
        Speaking of gasoline.

        Whole world has gone mad, and here you are with your gasoline... smile
        1. +7
          6 July 2026 08: 06
          Quote: mann
          Quote: Gardamir
          Speaking of gasoline.

          Whole world has gone mad, and here you are with your gasoline... smile

          The whole world does not end with Eastern Europe.
          1. man
            +6
            6 July 2026 08: 41
            Quote: Civil
            Quote: mann
            Quote: Gardamir
            Speaking of gasoline.

            Whole world has gone mad, and here you are with your gasoline... smile

            The whole world does not end with Eastern Europe.

            That's why I write "whole "World." Look, Trump is already in charge of football. smile
          2. -1
            7 July 2026 15: 37
            It's not ending. But there are just as many crazy people in Western Europe, if not more. Considering the refusal of cheap gas and the playing with fire in/on Ukraine, while the world is teetering on the brink of a Sarmatian invasion, and their hydrocarbon problems will be even worse, given the events in Iran.
            1. 0
              8 July 2026 06: 51
              Quote: Leontrotsky
              It's not ending. But there are just as many crazy people in Western Europe, if not more. Considering the refusal of cheap gas and the playing with fire in/on Ukraine, while the world is teetering on the brink of a Sarmatian invasion, and their hydrocarbon problems will be even worse, given the events in Iran.

              We don't care what they have. We're only interested in our own problems.
              1. -2
                8 July 2026 08: 28
                A typical liberal approach. Like, let's isolate Russia from the rest of the world and delve into its shortcomings. Any country, with this approach, would have hundreds of them. Since the 90s, those same liberals have been teaching us to follow the West's example. They kept saying, "Oh, look at the democracy they have there, what independent organizations they have (FIFA demonstrated how independent it is, snapping its fingers to accommodate Trump's whims), what freedom-loving media and independent journalists they have there." But when we start following these precepts, people like you start saying what you're saying. To understand how life is in a country, what's happening there, you need to compare the processes taking place there with those of other countries around the world. If the price of gasoline has risen by 6%, look at how much it costs in France, for example, amid the energy crisis that has engulfed the entire world. The Russian economy is part of the global economy, right? So why should processes typical of the rest of the world proceed any differently there?
                1. +1
                  8 July 2026 08: 43
                  Quote: Leontrotsky
                  A typical liberal approach)) Like, let's isolate Russia from the rest of the world and delve into its shortcomings.

                  I don't argue with bots. You don't have to answer.
                  1. -2
                    8 July 2026 08: 54
                    Don't answer))) Especially since, apparently, you have nothing to answer))))
      2. +1
        7 July 2026 00: 50
        Quote: Gardamir
        Speaking of gas, the last elevator broke down on Saturday evening. We called and were told the repairmen were busy, but the request was still pending. I wasn't born yesterday, and I remember that the repairmen usually arrived within half an hour of calling. So, I think, this is my guess, the repairmen simply don't have gas. They'll be able to fill up and come and fix it. In the meantime, we'll just be jumping with parachutes.

        If it's an elevator, you need to contact Netanyahu. He was a parachutist in his youth. And don't bother serious people like the head of the housing office.
      3. +1
        7 July 2026 13: 59
        Quote: Gardamir
        Speaking of gas, the last elevator broke down on Saturday evening. We called and were told the repairmen were busy, but the request was still pending. I wasn't born yesterday, and I remember that the repairmen usually arrived within half an hour of calling. So, I think, this is my guess, the repairmen simply don't have gas. They'll be able to fill up and come and fix it. In the meantime, we'll just be jumping with parachutes.

        Come on you
        A friend of mine has had her elevator replaced for a month now. She lives on the 10th floor.
      4. 0
        8 July 2026 13: 38
        "In the meantime, we'll jump with parachutes."

        Well, this is only possible when parachutes are better than gasoline.
    3. + 13
      6 July 2026 06: 44
      Yes, the author is quite good at the basics))) He can be understood too, if you dig deeper, you'll get into trouble)) The problem isn't with the traitors, the problem is with the agents
    4. + 20
      6 July 2026 07: 18
      In short, I would express the opinion that more than 30 years ago, under the USSR, there was also betrayal, but by individuals during the irreconcilable struggle between socialism and capitalism.
      After the 90s, after the deception of the entire people by a small circle of people under EBN and the emerging oligarchs, deception and betrayal rose to the state level, which is what has been happening ever since, without any social ideology in society.
      And the number of defectors from the authorities, officials and oligarchs to the "Garden of Eden" abroad is precisely an indicator of the relationship between the authorities and the people.
      Extreme income inequality between one segment of the population and the people, in the absence of ideology, gives rise to mistrust, rejection, and betrayal.
      1. + 18
        6 July 2026 07: 49
        Quote: ZovSailor
        And the number of defectors is precisely from the authorities, officials and oligarchs to the "Garden of Eden" abroad

        They became defectors when they bought a house there and started making a nest while in the service... and after their retirement, they were no longer defectors - they went home.
      2. + 11
        6 July 2026 07: 53
        Exactly. "There's no money. But hang in there." And so on, this is about cynical spitting in the people's faces from those who hold the power.
      3. -2
        7 July 2026 15: 44
        And when the people didn't come out in defense of socialism and chose the market, which would regulate everything, did they betray anything? And now they're amazed by paid education, healthcare, and the presence of oligarchs. Or did they not study history well in Soviet schools? But they taught them that social inequality is an integral part of capitalism. That oligarchs are its essence. That the retirement age in capitalist countries is at least 65 for men and 60 for women. That free housing and education are a priori impossible under capitalism. So why the wide-eyed shock and outrage? They wanted the market. Well, it regulated everything.
    5. +2
      6 July 2026 08: 37
      the statements of some of our politicians often look worse than the most Russophobic statements there

      What statements exactly? Looks like another campaign, which is exactly what Staver wrote about. Previously, the issue was simply resolved...
      1. +2
        6 July 2026 17: 00
        This is the most terrible day, October 16, 1941, in the history of the USSR, with the exception of, now, 1991, the traitors who infiltrated the government did their vile deed.
    6. + 14
      6 July 2026 09: 08
      The article is not all about our local betrayal. And that's not all, our elites betrayed their history, the USSR, destroyed it, went West. Then in the 90s, they betrayed their people, handing over the country to the West for control and the genocide of the people. In 2014, they betrayed the Russian Spring, fearing sanctions instead of starting the Second World War in 2014. We are betraying our economy by not developing it in favor of the West and now China. Our elites are tying the hands of our military, so the Second World War has become endless and strange. America bought everyone and everything.
    7. +6
      6 July 2026 12: 37
      Betrayal
      And who is he? The main traitor? bully No, no, I won’t name it because? Article.
    8. -9
      6 July 2026 15: 33
      Quote from turembo
      Spitting in the people's faces for over 30 years

      Well, if a people allows themselves to be spat in their faces for 30 years, that says a lot about that people. sad
      1. -4
        7 July 2026 14: 05
        Quote: guest
        Quote from turembo
        Spitting in the people's faces for over 30 years

        Well, if a people allows themselves to be spat in their faces for 30 years, that says a lot about that people. sad

        Indeed, we haven’t had a Maidan for a long time.
        But seriously, after the revolution, the spirit of freedom-loving people was diligently eradicated. The Bolsheviks had accomplished their task of raising the people; they no longer needed revolutions.
        1. +1
          7 July 2026 17: 29
          Quote: Panin (Michman)
          Indeed, we haven’t had a Maidan for a long time.

          Where did I call for a coup d'état?
    9. +4
      6 July 2026 20: 24
      But we've moved away from the Soviet Union with its "egalitarianism," social mobility, free healthcare, universal and free education, cheap housing, and so on. Long live our eternal visionaries and talkers.
      1. man
        +3
        6 July 2026 23: 24
        Quote: VenDora
        cheap housing

        Correct: free.
        1. -2
          7 July 2026 10: 52
          Let me correct it: free.

          That's wrong, you had to pay rent every month. There's no need to turn the USSR into a fairytale.
        2. -2
          7 July 2026 20: 21
          The housing issue was the most acute in the former USSR.
          I would like to remind you that in addition to the “free” apartments, there were also cooperative apartments that required a lot of money.
          And the greatest hopelessness was in this area.
          Instead of expanding access to cooperative housing, under Gorbachev they only restricted it and tightened the screws.
  2. +6
    6 July 2026 05: 17
    Betrayal of a person and even an entire nation as a result of a new, “capitalist” education.
    ...
    Rotten trees will never decorate your garden. Rotten people will never decorate a country!
    Hmm.
    Once again, they brought in capitalism of the wrong system.
    request
    Let's leave the author's foreign policy mental exercises aside: they are uninteresting and basically boil down to retelling what's on TV.
    Let's pay attention to how the author and others like him are trying - in a way that you've never read the History section on VO - to start an internal war with the capitalist traitors-rotten trees, or whoever is currently walking around as a traitor, "students, cyclists, Jews"?
    It's good that the government doesn't give in to such ideas (they know how it ends), after all, there are people who read the History section...
    good
    1. + 23
      6 July 2026 09: 17
      If you stubbornly pretend the problem doesn't exist, then the problem isn't going away, is it? And don't you think it's the capitalists themselves who have effectively declared an internal war on us, despite the ongoing external war? It's not right to turn everything upside down like that.
      1. man
        0
        6 July 2026 23: 31
        Quote: paul3390
        If you stubbornly pretend that the problem doesn't exist, then the problem won't go away, will it?

        What's called "ostrich policy?" And why have so many ostriches sprung up in Russia lately? request
    2. + 11
      6 July 2026 13: 44
      or who are the traitors now, "students, cyclists, Jews"?
      Electric scooters. laughing
  3. + 13
    6 July 2026 05: 23
    The most astonishing thing is that betrayal and paying for service to the enemy is also economically disadvantageous. How come people don't understand this? The thing is, judging by the reports, they don't pay much for all these terrorist attacks. Essentially, they pay pennies, which won't last long. What's more, you won't even get it, but you're guaranteed to go to jail. No one pays a million to prepare a terrorist attack. But what's a million when an apartment costs anywhere from two (the most basic) to seven to nine million? It's been calculated that to live on the interest, and decently at that, you need to have at least eighteen million in your account. You can be an outright enemy of your country, but you can't be such a fool as to believe you can earn that much and still avoid jail time. How many outright idiots do we have if there are people who buy into this?
    1. +8
      6 July 2026 05: 58
      And forever and ever
      A coward, a traitor - we always despise
      The enemy is the enemy, and war is still war,
      And the prison is cramped, and freedom is one - and we always rely on it.
      Time has not erased these understandings,
      You just need to lift the top layer -
      And steaming blood from my throat
      Feelings of eternal gush on us.
      Now and forever and ever, old man,
      And price is price, and wine is wine,
      And it’s always good if honor is saved,
      If the other's back is securely covered.
      We take purity, simplicity from the ancients,
      Sagas, fairy tales - we drag from the past, -
      Because good remains good -
      In the past, future and present!
    2. +5
      6 July 2026 06: 12
      How many outright idiots do we have if there are people who buy into this?
      Vyacheslav Olegovich, "the science of crime" says that in any society there will be individuals who want easy money and hope to "weave between the currents."
      The question is what's more effective in the situation the author is considering: a discreet effort to "identify and suppress" or a "100% holy war." In my opinion, while "identification and suppression" is effective, it's best to avoid the "holy war" of the author's preferred style.
      Simply because many individuals, simply due to their limited intelligence, do not understand that they will be found, “identified and stopped” under such provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, may begin to think about a new way of earning money (besides petty thefts, Roskomnadzor and other bad ideas).
      You underestimate the number of such individuals; believe me, there are many of them, and each one is convinced that he has "luck" for life, and in general, if he stole a shopping cart from a supermarket and there was nothing left, then he is immortal.
      request
      1. +2
        6 July 2026 06: 26
        Quote: Wildcat
        You underestimate the number of such individuals; believe me, there are many of them, and each one is convinced that he has "luck" for life, and in general, if he stole a shopping cart from a supermarket and there was nothing left, then he is immortal.

        I'm overestimating, absolutely. I know that... "people with special needs" make up 80% of society. I've written about this many times. But even among them, there are those "at the top" and those "at the bottom." And it turns out there are actually more of those "at the bottom" than expected! That's all!
        1. +2
          7 July 2026 01: 06
          Yeah, and while some rats are running around the captain's bridge up there, others are scurrying around the lower deck. And when they start doing this in sync, the boat starts rocking. Heh.
    3. +7
      6 July 2026 06: 13
      Quote: kalibr
      The most surprising thing is that betrayal with payment for service to the enemy is also economically disadvantageous.

      You're wrong here. It depends on the caliber.
      Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Yakovlev, beloved Chubais, General Kalugin and others... well, I just gave them off the top of my head.
      1. +3
        6 July 2026 06: 28
        Quote from tsvetahaki
        Depends on the caliber.

        Show me what service I need to render to whom to receive 18 million... Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Yakovlev, my beloved Chubais, General Kalugin, and others... I've just given you a rough idea—each case needs to be examined separately. This is far from the usual betrayal and working for another country for money.
        1. -1
          6 July 2026 13: 14
          millions...Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Yakovlev, my beloved Chubais, General Kalugin and others...that's just off the top of my head
          How did it turn out that all those mentioned were members of... the CPSU?!! laughingBy the way! You, dear Vyacheslav Olegovich, also had the honor of being there, didn't you? But this is just a side note.
          1. -2
            6 July 2026 13: 34
            Quote: ArchiPhil
            How did it happen that all those mentioned were members of the... CPSU?! By the way! You, dear Vyacheslav Olegovich, also had the honor of being one? But that's just by the way.

            Yes, I thought I was better than most, and I work better than most, but where is the best place? In the vanguard of the builders of communism. And then I worked in the archives and learned everything that Pravda didn't write about. All problems stem from IGNORANCE, a lack of reliable information. New information changes your worldview, and dramatically.
            1. -1
              6 July 2026 13: 50
              I thought I was better than most, and I work better than most, but where is the best place? In the vanguard of the builders of communism. Then I worked in the archives and learned everything that Pravda hadn't written about. All problems stem from IGNORANCE, a lack of reliable information. New information changes your worldview, and dramatically.
              For God's sake! Who am I to reproach? *Knowledge is Power*! laughingBut? You still haven't answered the question! Again: why were those mentioned members of the CPSU?
              1. -4
                6 July 2026 15: 42
                Quote: ArchiPhil
                Why were those mentioned members of the CPSU?

                How should I know? There could have been very few reasons...
                1. 0
                  6 July 2026 15: 51
                  there may be reasons...
                  Oh yeah! This is important.
              2. +7
                6 July 2026 17: 23
                Again: why were those mentioned members of the CPSU?

                Because there were no others, just like now, every dishonest person hides behind the wings of United Russia...
                1. -3
                  6 July 2026 17: 27
                  Because there were no others, just like now, every dishonest person hides behind the wings of United Russia...
                  And yet you must agree that this is by no means an answer! hi
            2. man
              -1
              6 July 2026 23: 44
              Quote: kalibr
              And then I worked in the archives and learned everything that Pravda hadn't written about. All problems stem from IGNORANCE, a lack of reliable information. New information changes your worldview, and dramatically.

              But they didn't give up their chatter; they were lecturers for the CPSU Central Committee and remained so until the USSR collapsed... Just don't deny it, I remember...
              1. +2
                7 July 2026 01: 24
                Quote: mann
                But they didn’t give up their chatter; they remained lecturers for the Central Committee of the CPSU until the USSR collapsed...

                Quote: mann
                But they didn’t give up their chatter; they remained lecturers for the Central Committee of the CPSU until the USSR collapsed...

                Do you blame him for not betraying the CPSU until the very end? In Lobnya, until it completely disappeared? The only Lobnya resident I know who became a dollar millionaire among those who emigrated to the West was the son of a stubborn Stalinist—a history teacher at my school who harassed anyone he suspected of sedition. Moreover, during his lessons, he forced students to take notes from the history textbook and labeled those who answered without using such notes as anti-Soviet seditious activists. His opponent at school was a Polish woman historian. His class consisted of the children of pilots and aircraft technicians at Aeroflot and Sheremetyevo Airport. The Polish woman taught the children, who came from the families of workers at the Ceramic Factory. But the history exams in my 10th-grade class were a terrible embarrassment for the Stalinist and a triumph for the Polish historian. Later, I was told that all his aspiring students who applied for admission to the history departments were accepted. This was probably one of the reasons for the collapse of the USSR.
              2. -3
                7 July 2026 06: 44
                Quote: mann
                All problems stem from IGNORANCE, a lack of reliable information. New information changes one's worldview, and dramatically so.

                You might even say that this is not true...
          2. + 13
            6 July 2026 17: 50
            Well, they're also traitors to the CPSU. The communists are right about that. They betrayed the Party, they betrayed the Country, or vice versa. Because back then, it was all the same.
            1. +4
              6 July 2026 17: 57
              betrayed the Country too,
              It's a real shame for the country!!!
          3. +9
            6 July 2026 18: 50
            Quote: ArchiPhil
            How did it turn out that all those mentioned were members of... the CPSU?!!

            What is so unclear to you? belay
            Don't you know that "only your own betray"? Are the only people who seriously betray you bosses? And who else besides members of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union could be at the helm?
            As now - United Russia.
            Just a small detail: what percentage of United Russia members are thieves and traitors? Compare that to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
            Numbers and percentages decide everything... even the Gestapo had a most honest colonel who saved Jews. Which doesn't make the Gestapo a charitable organization.
            Just wait, as in the famous song "Tsar Nikolashka" - and it will turn out that General Ivanov and his ilk should be called not "corrupt", but "traitors" and the answer to the question will be - "and who covered for them"?
            Everything is known through comparison. Even the degree of spoilage of a product.
            1. 0
              6 July 2026 19: 02
              Even in the Gestapo there was a very honest colonel who saved Jews.
              Stop, stop, stop! By definition, there could not be colonels in the Gestapo.
              Everything is known through comparison. Even the degree of spoilage of a product.
              Here I agree.
              1. +2
                6 July 2026 19: 26
                By definition, there could not be colonels in the Gestapo.
                Seryoga, don't screw up! Müller was a colonel in the army.
                1. +1
                  6 July 2026 19: 40
                  Seryoga, don't screw up! Müller was a colonel in the army.
                  SS-Gruppenführer Colonel???? bully
                2. man
                  0
                  7 July 2026 00: 15
                  Quote: 3x3zsave
                  Müller was a colonel in the army.

                  General... remember, Stirlitz called his shoulder straps a general's in the scene of the search for the "tuberculosis patient"
              2. man
                +1
                7 July 2026 00: 11
                Quote: ArchiPhil
                Stop, stop, stop! By definition, there could not be colonels in the Gestapo.

                Standantenführer... like Stirlitz smile
              3. +3
                7 July 2026 06: 28
                Stop, stop, stop! By definition, there could not be colonels in the Gestapo.

                There is a fight against all foreign words "Obersturmbannführer"...
                And Werner Best (Karl Rudolf Werner Best) had the rank of SS-Obergruppenführer... and saved most of the Danish Jews.
                And yet, the Gestapo was not an organization for saving Jews, despite what some might think based on examples.
          4. 0
            11 July 2026 16: 55
            "By the way! You, esteemed Vyacheslav Olegovich, also had the honor of being there, didn't you? But that's just a side note."

            There are no particular questions about those who had the honor of being there. But there were also those who were fortunate enough to be there. These were the Yeltsins, the Chubais, and others; I think this list will grow, in about... twenty years.
    4. -1
      6 July 2026 06: 46
      This is for the dumbest ones) For those who are more interested in the best German and Pizza Hut and accounts in foreign currencies))
    5. man
      +3
      6 July 2026 07: 39
      Quote: kalibr
      The most surprising thing is that betrayal and paying for service to the enemy is also economically disadvantageous. The fact is, judging by the reports, they don't pay much for all these terrorist attacks. In fact, they pay pennies.

      I see you've already had a look around. smile Have you tried bargaining? laughing
      1. +2
        6 July 2026 08: 21
        Quote: mann
        Have you tried bargaining?

        That's exactly what I'm writing about: no matter how you haggle, the business is unprofitable, and if it's unprofitable, who the hell needs it! I'm not even talking about the moral aspect. The concept of morality is completely foreign to many. It's purely a matter of financial calculation!
        1. man
          +3
          6 July 2026 08: 30
          Quote: kalibr
          That's exactly what I'm writing about: no matter how you haggle, the business is unprofitable, and if it's unprofitable, then what the hell is it for!

          It's immediately obvious that you're a knowledgeable person... you probably even drew up a business plan beforehand. smile
          I advise you to refer to the unstoppable rise in prices laughing
          1. 0
            6 July 2026 09: 29
            Quote: mann
            You probably even drew up a business plan beforehand

            Why write a business plan for something completely unprofitable, or even more so, pointless in every respect? Would you even think twice before writing? Would you write a business plan for removing the Moon from the sky, selling the Mariana Trench, or buying land on Mars? No, really... Why do you think I'm capable of such stupidity?
            1. +1
              6 July 2026 13: 58
              , or buying land on Mars?
              By the way, that's a good business project! As far as I remember, plots of land on the Moon have been trading for quite some time now...
              Hello, Vyacheslav Olegovich!
            2. +2
              6 July 2026 14: 52
              Mariana Trench sales,
              They finally put it up for sale???? I'll buy it, damn it, no problem! How much do they want? laughing
            3. man
              +1
              7 July 2026 00: 24
              Quote: kalibr
              You should at least think with your head.

              I am forced by professional habit to think with my head, and not with my tongue, like some former lecturers of the CPSU Central Committee
              1. -1
                7 July 2026 06: 42
                Quote: mann
                Due to professional habit, I am forced to think with my head,

                Judging by the comments this is not clear.
        2. +1
          6 July 2026 09: 53
          Quote: kalibr
          Quote: mann
          Have you tried bargaining?

          That's exactly what I'm writing about: no matter how you haggle, the business is unprofitable, and if it's unprofitable, who the hell needs it! I'm not even talking about the moral aspect. The concept of morality is completely foreign to many. It's purely a matter of financial calculation!

          Yes, of course, it's much more profitable to own a fraudulent call center. Or to embezzle state property. That's the profit, sarcasm.
          1. -4
            6 July 2026 11: 17
            Quote: Reptiloid
            Yes, of course, it's much more profitable to own a fraudulent call center. Or to embezzle state property. That's the profit, sarcasm.

            The chances of getting caught are lower, yes, but they exist and are quite high. Has this ever occurred to you? The difference between smart people and fools is that they avoid victimizing behavior!
            1. +3
              6 July 2026 11: 41
              It's strange that you didn't say that if you were caught or subjected to ----- fools fool fool And the smart ones don't get caught in the shadows
              1. +1
                6 July 2026 12: 42
                It's strange that you didn't say that if you were caught or subjected to ----- fools fool fool But smart people don't get caught even in the shadows
                Dima, are you in business? Or are you just here to argue?
              2. -3
                6 July 2026 13: 27
                Quote: Reptiloid
                And the smart ones don't get caught in the shadows

                Sooner or later, everyone who breaks the law on a large scale gets caught. And breaking the law on a small scale makes no sense at all. That is, it's unprofitable, no matter how small or large.
              3. +2
                6 July 2026 13: 37
                It's strange that you didn't say that if you were caught or subjected to ----- fools fool fool But smart people don't get caught even in the shadows
                Dmitry, if you don't have the slightest idea about the structure and organization of business as such, then there's a point... just writing about frogs, right? laughingSooner or later, you will understand this. I hope!
        3. +3
          6 July 2026 17: 53
          All Judases, starting with that very one, don't pay attention to morality, no matter how much or who teaches them. Only pieces of silver. And to no avail.
    6. +1
      6 July 2026 09: 22
      A significant portion of the younger generation, unfortunately, is not burdened by logic. They need money here and now – for a new iPhone or some other trendy gadget. They don't even bother to consider what will happen next and what the possible consequences are.

      For example, how is treason for pennies any different in terms of stupidity than a loan from a microfinance scam? But they do take them, and there's no shortage of clients.
      1. -1
        6 July 2026 15: 06
        A significant portion of the younger generation, unfortunately, is not burdened by logic. They need money here and now – for a new iPhone or some other trendy gadget. They don't even bother to consider what will happen next and what the possible consequences are.
        Wouldn't you like to ask your parents? Yes, we're the ones who created them, no? And everyone will say that mine isn't like that, no?
        1. + 10
          6 July 2026 15: 57
          Unfortunately, it's practically impossible for parents to resist not only the full force of state propaganda but also the reality around them. How can you convince a child, for example, that stealing is wrong when the elite are stealing by the trainload, not even by the truckload? How can you explain the concepts of honor and conscience when people around you live happily ever after, completely lacking them? And so on.
          1. +3
            6 July 2026 18: 46
            How can you convince a child, for example, that stealing is not good - when the higher-ups steal not even by the KAMAZ truckload, but by the trainload?
            Well, I somehow managed to explain it. I explained that daddy is a loser, of course, but you, daughter, are not like that. The result? You got married, have two grandchildren. Not bad. Lord, half of Russia is like me!
          2. +1
            7 July 2026 00: 25
            Quote: paul3390
            The top brass are stealing not even by KAMAZ trucks, but by trainloads

            Vasyl Dmitrievich, please log back. laughing
      2. +1
        6 July 2026 18: 52
        It's not just young people who take out loans from microfinance scams. More often, it's drunkards who borrow money until payday.
    7. +1
      7 July 2026 00: 22
      Quote: kalibr
      How many outright idiots do we have if there are people who buy into this?

      Well, after all, quite a lot of people fall for all sorts of telephone scams.
      1. 0
        7 July 2026 06: 46
        Quote: guest
        Well, after all, quite a lot of people fall for all sorts of telephone scams.

        That's exactly it... Moreover, they are older, have received the best education in the world and were born in the most well-read country in the world.
    8. +2
      7 July 2026 11: 10
      How come people don't understand this?

      A significant number of people, about 7%, regularly take out microloans and are not deterred by the 300% annual interest rate. Some statistics on microfinance organizations https://www.rbc.ru/finances/13/05/2021/609bb5ce9a79470fbad602cc
      This is the realization of the desire to get money “for free” here and now,
      1. 0
        7 July 2026 11: 31
        Quote: Sensor
        This is the realization of the desire to get money “for free” here and now,

        Well, at least 7%...
  4. +4
    6 July 2026 05: 36
    As strange as it may seem, all of this is connected to the wave of anti-Soviet sentiment in our country. Many people still have books by Suvorov-Rezun on their shelves, where he turns the entire history of the country upside down. And countless such books and films have appeared. We have sowed a dual perception of our country. The goal was noble—to create a society of exemplary consumers who would not be interested in those who built so much, or in what they now use. It's clear that anti-Soviet sentiment has become a gold mine for many, a Klondike. But all this fell upon immature minds. I watched a film about the war online. It was about a boy who stole a circus horse. A good film. But a comment really pissed me off. It said, "For the joy of the red-assed." And they still haven't deleted it. So, someone really needs this.
    1. man
      +3
      6 July 2026 07: 51
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      The goal was noble-to create a society of exemplary people consumers

      Well, I'm afraid you have a very good idea of ​​nobility.
    2. +3
      6 July 2026 09: 25
      There's a popular website in St. Petersburg called fontanku.ru... A favorite hangout for liberals of all stripes. I highly recommend reading the comments under the news stories there sometime – the stuff they say makes even the hairs on my bald head stand on end!! And the site is still thriving.
      1. +1
        6 July 2026 10: 44
        The site is a mirror and is not to blame for anything.
        1. +2
          6 July 2026 11: 41
          Is that true? Why then, for example, do people get banned here for such statements? But there, they don't? What do you think?
          1. +1
            6 July 2026 12: 48
            Is that true? Why then, for example, do people get banned here for such statements? But there, they don't? What do you think?
            The problem is the moderators. The site is not bad, I read it sometimes. And my friend from St. Petersburg sends me messages. It's quite interesting.
      2. man
        +1
        7 July 2026 00: 35
        Quote: paul3390
        Even the hair on my bald head stands on end from what they carry there!!

        You're interested... I've been dreaming of getting my hair back for a long time. smile
    3. 0
      6 July 2026 11: 57
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      Many people still have Suvorov-Rezun's books on their shelves, where he turns the entire history of the country upside down.

      Because Susloids and GLAVPUR distorted history to suit the next General Secretary.
      How can one believe in the history of a country from which people and events were cut out and replaced with what was needed?
      For 10 years they talked—and people saw it—that Trotsky was the organizer of the Revolution. Then a somersault—Trotsky and Stalin. Then another somersault—Stalin did it all alone, Trotsky the jerk.
      And they began to cut Trotsky out of history textbooks and cover him up with ink.
      "Damned tsarism" - I had an urge - "Shurka Nevsky + Vanka the Terrible" are in favor.
      Vlasov fled, and the 2nd Shock Army became non-kosher - it was as if it never existed...
      All the reasons for the defeat of 1941 are described in detail in the Act of acceptance of the People's Commissariat of 05/07/1940 - was Voroshilov shot?
      No, they kept quiet for 50 years...

      Therefore, it is not surprising that people read Rezun - he hoped What's true there, and not some nonsense from the Chief of Police...
      1. 0
        6 July 2026 13: 27
        I thought long and hard about Trotsky and the Trotskyists. About Trotskyism. After all, many dreamed of a World Revolution. Revolutionary theorists and ordinary people. Trotsky, the creator of the Red Army. An orator. Of course, he was very popular. And how could we explain to the people that a World Revolution was unattainable? That the project had to be abandoned? They couldn't... But they began, little by little. Although, perhaps, some work was being done among the masses. But gradually. And those who loudly advocated it were subjected to punitive measures.
        1. -2
          6 July 2026 15: 29
          Quote: Reptiloid
          And how could they explain to the people that a World Revolution was unfeasible? That the project had to be abandoned? They couldn't do it.

          And you are naive:
          1) WWI - the price of human life is a penny. He jabbed with a bayonet and calmly went on to have lunch.
          2) GV. Still hasn't calmed down. The value of human life is zero. A trivial example is Algemba. They drove an army (after disarming them!!!!!) into the steppe in winter to build a railway - without shelter or food. They had to run away - there were Cossack territories all around.
          3) 1924 – they explained to the people quite easily and casually – "Why are we bringing back the bourgeoisie?" Everyone had heard about decimations and Algemba – and they sat pretty much unmoved.
          4)
          Quote: Reptiloid
          And how can we explain to the people that a World Revolution is not possible?
          - people from своих I didn't want to leave the courtyards in principle. Therefore, the idea of ​​a World Revolution was swirling in the heads of a small number (compared to 82% of the peasants) urban.
          That's why the famous "Are you for the communists or for the Bolsheviks?" (C) - the communists promised somewhere far away, and the Bolsheviks are here and now.
          5) Stalin was a nobody in the Army—Trotsky was everything. This is one of the reasons why they had to shoot the soldiers—to appoint their own.
          No more.....
          1. +5
            6 July 2026 15: 55
            This is hindsight on your part. The propaganda was so strong that there was no question where 5,000,000 men under arms would go.
            1. 0
              7 July 2026 09: 11
              Quote: Reptiloid
              This is hindsight on your part. The propaganda was so strong that there was no question where 5,000,000 men under arms would go.

              And this is yours - Soviet mythology "Let us all rise as one...".
              In reality, the 1926 Criminal Code of the RSFSR introduced execution as a punishment for all military crimes committed during wartime long before the Great Patriotic War.
              This, to put it mildly, is very at odds with propaganda and mythology - if a "united national impulse" must be supported by execution for desertion.

              After being wounded, my grandfather was discharged and worked in special communications. In the winter of 1944, he was attacked by three Stalingrad deserters while traveling through the countryside.
              He killed one and wounded two. He dragged two frozen logs of wood on horseback 20 kilometers to the police station. He wrote a statement and was told, "Well, he killed them, that's all!" They sent a report to the unit, and it was confirmed they were deserters. They collapsed the wall of the ravine so the wolves wouldn't have anything to eat.
              And that's it, everyday life...
              1. +1
                7 July 2026 09: 42
                Again, hindsight and the modern view of a modern person. The country was different, the people were different. I'm getting ready for work, calls, emails. I have to leave at 12. Maybe I'll make it before I leave, I'll write. If not, then in detail by evening.
                1. -3
                  7 July 2026 10: 16
                  Quote: Reptiloid
                  Again, hindsight and the modern view of a modern person.

                  The 1926 Code - afterknowledge??? fool
                  If you don't understand, they add it to the Criminal Code only current and highly dangerous crimes.
                  They don't include minor and isolated violations, only those that pose a massive social danger.
                  Also, they don't include "just in case"- if there were 4 articles on pedophilia and child prostitution in the Criminal Code of 1926, then they were there and nothing can be done about it.
                  The same situation and military crimes - based on the existing experience of the Civil War, criminal practice and the developing situation - articles tightened.
                  Not because the Soviet government was evil, but because this was the only way to limit as much as possible the harm caused by these crimes.
              2. 0
                7 July 2026 17: 54
                Crimes have existed at all times.
                people... didn't want to leave.
                They left. But it was necessary to return to the BLACK REDIVISION. And ---- they returned. Remember the years. The dates. And it was necessary to take this into account. They returned, at least from the army, at least from the city from work.
                There was enthusiasm, and propaganda, and a desire for victory. Immediately after the Revolution and after the Civil War, everyone knew the war was still ahead. And they believed that after the World Revolution, everything would be fine. After all, there was a theory.
                There was the Comintern, general classes, training. There were many Trotskyists in the country, and specialists came from other countries, too. Construction projects, industrialization. The rise of industry. It's a pity, of course, for the theoreticians. But there were others, too. There was a lot. They teamed up with criminals, there were many real spies, and monarchists hid, but there was enemy terrorism.
  5. + 14
    6 July 2026 05: 39
    When the article talks about how betrayal should be shouted at, not talked about, we know very well from Soviet times that, for example, not a single political education class was devoted to the fact that the Belarusian village of Khatyn was burned by traitors from the OUN, its Bukovina Kuren unit. Oh, and Shcherbitsky, crawling on Brezhnev's ruts, begged him to order silence about it. And how many hours of political education were devoted to the betrayal of the traitor Vlasov and his followers? Regarding the traitor Sablin, everyone was ordered to remain silent, instead of analyzing the nature of his betrayal. Can you recall how many lessons, lectures, and films were presented to society to analyze, piece by piece, all the betrayals of Yeltsin and his associates against Russia? After all, where was the first place Yeltsin reported the completion of the process of destroying the USSR? That's right, to the President of the United States. That is, he reported on the successful betrayal of the Motherland.
    So, these traitors are inconvenient. Better to keep quiet about the nickname, like an ostrich with its head in the sand...
    1. +9
      6 July 2026 06: 15
      How do you feel about Kolchak serving the British Crown?
    2. +5
      6 July 2026 08: 01
      Quote: north 2
      Perhaps you remember how many lessons, lectures, and films were presented to society in order to dissect, piece by piece, all the betrayals of Yeltsin and his associates against Russia?

      Hmmm... who do you think should organize such a political lesson? Yeltsin isn't officially a traitor, and even has his own center—funded by the state and built with budget money. It's essentially a federal state budget institution.
    3. +7
      6 July 2026 09: 22
      betrayal of Yeltsin and his accomplices
      How many times have you heard the phrase before?
      to assess Yeltsin's betrayal and the predatory privatization
      And now she's long gone, too. It looks like EBN will remain the same. a fighter for democracy,, and the 90s --- "saints" (ugh) After all, our oligators are trying to rewrite the history of the country and create their own "pantheon of heroes" sarcasm
      1. 0
        6 July 2026 09: 33
        Quote: Reptiloid
        And now she's long gone. Apparently, Yeltsin will remain a champion of democracy, and the 90s -- "saints" (ugh). After all, our oligarchs are trying to rewrite the country's history and create their own "pantheon of heroes." Sarcasm.

        Dmitry! You constantly forget that THERE ARE NO EVENTS in the world unless someone has written about them. But that someone can provide a wide variety of information, which you simply cannot verify. That's where all your "knowledge" comes from. But you have no idea how accurate it is! You're writing generalities. What you need is, "Ivanov distorted information in such-and-such a text... gave incorrect figures... pages, publisher, year..." Without that, a reproach to the oligarchs is meaningless!
        1. +5
          6 July 2026 09: 42
          hi I'm tired of reminiscing about the same old stuff. Everyone already knows it. About how great N2 was, how great things were in the Russian Empire in 2013... How good Stolypin was, and how great everything would have been if only Sarcasm had been there, of course... Or the existence of the EBN Center. There's no money for some things, but not for this. Or the various references to Stolypin in titles. Or Witte. Now they're "heroes."
          1. +4
            6 July 2026 11: 14
            Quote: Reptiloid
            Everyone already knows.

            EVERYONE knows, Dmitry, that's "nobody." General knowledge is usually unreliable. That's why I never cite "everyone knows," but try to include the author, page, and publisher.About how good N2 was, how good it was in RI in 2013 This is all just your imagination, because there's nothing like it in serious historical literature. The work of both Stolypin and Witte was positive in some ways, and not in others. Only fools elevate historical figures to a pedestal of "fear and reproach." And usually, it's just commentary... But who considers them a source of information?
            1. +2
              6 July 2026 11: 36
              Who reads serious history? But the Tsar's Days and the talk of the innocent dead...
              I've never gotten around to going to Stolypin's dacha, even though I'm often nearby. I often drive past Witte's house (or palace?), so I'll have to check it out.
              1. +2
                6 July 2026 13: 25
                Quote: Reptiloid
                I've never gotten around to going to Stolypin's dacha, even though I'm often nearby. I often drive past Witte's house (or palace?), so I'll have to check it out.

                Bad. This is where mental laziness begins...
                1. +1
                  6 July 2026 17: 33
                  But every summer I go to the Kirov Apartment Museum and the Museum of St. Petersburg Avant-garde.
                  1. -1
                    6 July 2026 18: 03
                    Quote: Reptiloid
                    But every summer I go to the Kirov Apartment Museum and the Museum of St. Petersburg Avant-garde.

                    There are many museums in St. Petersburg, that's true...
                    1. 0
                      6 July 2026 18: 09
                      Quote: kalibr
                      ......There are many museums in St. Petersburg, that's true...
                      That's true. But I can't travel far for some reason. I mostly choose the ones that are close by. There are private ones and they're practically free. I'll go ask Anton about something.
                2. 0
                  7 July 2026 18: 47
                  It's a good thing I didn't have time to go. Anton said there was no dacha. laughing And I would have gone off like a fool, wandering here and there, searching. It really is a beautiful place. I would have embarrassed myself with my questions. I'd be better off going to the Toy Museum. It's not far.
                  1. 0
                    8 July 2026 19: 33
                    Quote: Reptiloid
                    I would embarrass myself with my questions.

                    Dmitry, you can't embarrass yourself with questions. There's no shame in asking about something you don't know!
                    1. 0
                      8 July 2026 20: 58
                      Quote: kalibr
                      Quote: Reptiloid
                      I would embarrass myself with my questions.

                      Dmitry, you can't embarrass yourself with questions. There's no shame in asking about something you don't know!

                      You have no idea lol There's such a beautiful place there -- Lopukhinsky Garden, a pond or lake, old trees, a river, it's interesting on the other side, two bridges are visible, it's quiet, although there's traffic all around. And I would look for a dacha that doesn't exist and sort of look. After all, I used to always ask drivers when I drove by -- had they seen that dacha from that side? They said no. wassat And I thought that people were stupid wink
                      1. 0
                        9 July 2026 06: 01
                        Quote: Reptiloid
                        And I would look for a dacha that doesn’t exist and look like they were looking.

                        They looked at me like I was someone who didn't know something. So what?
                      2. 0
                        9 July 2026 10: 31
                        Since I mentioned huge trees, I'll ask you. How are the trees in Penza? Over the last 12 years, the trees in the city have been getting taller and taller. The birch trees in the courtyard have already grown up to the 12th floor. And in other places too. Or is there an apple tree in the old housing stock that reaches the 7th floor with huge apples on top???? How absurd.
                      3. +1
                        9 July 2026 13: 52
                        Quote: Reptiloid
                        If you remembered about the huge trees

                        Exactly the same! There are tons of towering poplars, taller than the fifth floor. But many of them are being pruned. Branches grow out of the stumps and look like dandelions, only green. At my dacha, I have a huge linden tree and a birch tree on the neighboring plots. They don't reach the 12th floor, but they're definitely five stories tall, maybe even more. Our city is very green; foreign students say we live in a forest.
              2. +2
                6 July 2026 17: 47
                I’m not planning to go to Stolypin’s dacha, even though I’m often nearby.
                The dacha has been gone for a long time, the obelisk only stands in this place.
                1. +2
                  6 July 2026 17: 56
                  Quote: 3x3zsave
                  .....The dacha has been gone for a long time, the obelisk only stands in this place.
                  This is in Lopukhinsky Garden, you mean, Anton hi
                  1. +1
                    6 July 2026 18: 22
                    My compliments, Dmitry!
                    I mean the obelisk on Aptekarskaya Embankment.
                    1. +1
                      6 July 2026 18: 51
                      Yes, I just looked online ---- the building is lost.
                2. +1
                  6 July 2026 18: 11
                  Anton, one more question ----- Were there any wink Are you at the Hermitage storage facility nearest to us? fellow
                  1. +1
                    6 July 2026 19: 03
                    Have you been to the Hermitage's nearest storage facility?
                    I haven't been to the Old Village and I don't plan to.
                    1. 0
                      6 July 2026 19: 28
                      I haven't been either, although I often plan to. I love going to the Buddhist temple.
            2. +1
              7 July 2026 09: 28
              About how good N2 was, how good it was in RI in 2013 These are just your fantasies, ......

              hi I just now realized that I made a mistake! I meant it 1913 !!! There was talk about this! How industry was booming and the war got in the way. And what about industry? They were practically preparing for space. But the Bolsheviks ruined it all. And why write down this nonsense, who said it, when? These fantasies will continue.
              1. -2
                7 July 2026 10: 07
                Quote: Reptiloid
                How industry was booming, and the war got in the way. And what about industry? They were practically preparing for space. But the Bolsheviks ruined it all. And why write down this nonsense, who said it, when? These fantasies will continue.

                Dmitry! Why write this? What, are you saying industry wasn't booming? It was booming; the country enjoyed very high rates of development. It's no wonder all the comparisons later were made with 1913, the most prosperous year. And yes, the war got in the way. And no one was planning to go into space, that's clear, right? Why distort things like that? "The Bolsheviks ruined everything"? Who, and when, specifically, claimed that? And what exactly did they ruin? That they accelerated the country's economic development is undeniable. That the price of industrialization and everything else was high is also undeniable. That ultimately their efforts proved insufficient is also a fact; they couldn't overcome the petty-bourgeois consciousness of the masses. So, what fantasies? Don't project the philistine mass consciousness onto historical realities, that's what I'll tell you.
                1. +2
                  7 July 2026 18: 15
                  I'm just quoting, so to speak, today's mass-market words, various excerpts. And I don't intend to memorize everything. Just for the occasion. As an author of books about PR, you can't help but see that everything Soviet, post-revolutionary, is being denigrated. Someone, perhaps even Pavel, like Rvz, wrote here that as long as there's an older generation that knew the USSR, there are difficulties in reformatting. But the struggle still goes on. For the next generations.
                  1. -2
                    8 July 2026 19: 32
                    Quote: Reptiloid
                    There is a literal denigration of everything Soviet.

                    But I see that now this past is being assessed very soberly, and both the negative and positive aspects are being noted. "Literal denigration" happened in the 90s.
    4. 0
      6 July 2026 12: 00
      Quote: north 2
      Regarding the traitor Sablin, everyone was ordered to remain silent, instead of examining the nature of his betrayal.

      Crew - not involved!!! - they quickly distributed it among different fleets and then quickly got rid of it under any pretext
    5. +6
      6 July 2026 17: 39
      betrayal of Yeltsin and his associates before Russia

      And as is known, the companion of Unit 26 rules Russia, since he is a companion, it means that both he and his entourage continue his work...
  6. + 19
    6 July 2026 05: 49
    Former Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alfred Koch served as Viktor Chernomyrdin's deputy for several months in 1997. In 2014, he was able to leave for Germany, despite the fact that a painting by Isaak Brodsky was found on him at the airport.
    Former Russian Economy Minister Yakov Urinson, who headed the ministry from 1997 to 1998, hastily left Russia in 2015 for "an Eastern European country," according to RBC sources. He soon became involved in the "Rusnano case" concerning embezzlement at the state-owned company: his name was mentioned in the case against the company Mikropribor Nanotech, which funneled over 65 million rubles abroad.
    Former Chelyabinsk Region Governor Boris Dubrovsky resigned voluntarily in April 2019 and fled to Switzerland. In October, a criminal case was opened against him for abuse of office. Damages in this case were estimated at 20 billion rubles:
    Former Nizhny Novgorod Mayor Oleg Kondrashov left for the United States in 2015, immediately after leaving his post as mayor. By that time, he had become the subject of an abuse of office case—in December 2014, he sold shares in the fuel and energy company TEK-NN.
    The list is long...and this is just off the top of my head....
    smile so the author's reasoning is such a trifle against the backdrop of these outrages.
    The rotten supports of our state apparatus...they will not hold up the state building.
    1. BAI
      +2
      6 July 2026 06: 27
      The damages in this case were estimated at 20 billion rubles:

      Poverty. People have hundreds of billions of
      1. 0
        6 July 2026 12: 04
        Quote: BAI
        The damages in this case were estimated at 20 billion rubles:

        Poverty. People hundreds of billions find

        Apparently I missed it - who?
    2. 0
      6 July 2026 06: 52
      These are all just agents who just did their job (sabotage is also an art) And what about the top brass of "Nashi" who later ended up in the US and Germany? And despite their anti-Western attacks, they were received with enthusiasm.
    3. -1
      6 July 2026 12: 05
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      The rotten supports of our state apparatus...they will not hold up the state building.

      So, the USSR had a rotten state apparatus, since the USSR collapsed?
      1. +5
        6 July 2026 12: 27
        Quote: your1970
        So, the USSR had a rotten state apparatus, since the USSR collapsed?

        Without a doubt...starting from the top...with Gorbachev. request
        1. -2
          6 July 2026 12: 35
          Quote: The same Lech
          Quote: your1970
          So, the USSR had a rotten state apparatus, since the USSR collapsed?

          Without a doubt...starting from the top...with Gorbachev. request

          The device always rots from the bottom - it's ironclad.
          If there was one top, MSG would have retired like Khrushchev on jet propulsion.
          If the device hadn't been rotten, MSG wouldn't have even appeared.
        2. 0
          6 July 2026 12: 54
          Certainly...starting at the top...with Gorbachev. request
          And before him? Was he normal? Gorbachev came and oops! No country? Sorry, Alexey, but I categorically disagree with you! bully
          1. +5
            6 July 2026 15: 01
            Quote: ArchiPhil
            Certainly...starting at the top...with Gorbachev. request
            And before him? Was he normal? Gorbachev came and oops! No country? Sorry, Alexey, but I categorically disagree with you! bully

            And before him there was Lenin, he came and there were no more bourgeois, actually this is called the role of the individual in history.
            1. -3
              6 July 2026 17: 54
              Actually, this is called the role of personality in history.
              The role of the individual in history is insignificant. People create their own idols.
  7. Eug
    + 23
    6 July 2026 06: 23
    Betrayal? Wasn't recognizing Poroshenko's regime treasonous? Or the "request" not to hold a referendum on independence for the LPR and DPR? Or the de facto rejection of the "Russian Spring"?
    1. + 12
      6 July 2026 08: 01
      Oh, what awkward questions you ask... And what did you expect from a follower of EBN who reported to the US President and then to Congress that the idol of "communism has been defeated."
    2. +1
      6 July 2026 12: 56
      Betrayal? Wasn't recognizing Poroshenko's regime treasonous? Or the "request" not to hold a referendum on independence for the LPR and DPR? Or the de facto rejection of the "Russian Spring"?
      Who are you hinting at???? laughing
      1. Eug
        +2
        6 July 2026 13: 10
        Everyone is free to give free rein to their imagination....
        1. +3
          6 July 2026 13: 18
          Everyone is free to give free rein to their imagination....
          I love specifics! GDP!!! This is from *Kursk*! hi
    3. 0
      6 July 2026 15: 06
      Quote: Eug
      Betrayal? Wasn't recognizing Poroshenko's regime treasonous? Or the "request" not to hold a referendum on independence for the LPR and DPR? Or the de facto rejection of the "Russian Spring"?

      What betrayal are you talking about? Businessmen tried to resolve the pipeline issue peacefully; it was absolutely necessary. Let me remind you that there were plans, officially announced, to make the LPR, DPR, and DPR autonomous republics within Ukraine, and in exchange, the pipeline would work. You and your "Russian Spring" were completely out of touch.
      1. Eug
        +1
        6 July 2026 16: 10
        So what about the "plans"? Are they embodied in the Minsk agreements? And what's the word for promising not to marry?
        1. +3
          6 July 2026 18: 02
          What is it called to promise and not get married?
          "The Marriage of Figaro".
  8. -4
    6 July 2026 06: 27
    We've had a huge number of Ukrainians living in our country since Soviet times—just look at the names of those around us. And they all have relatives left in Ukraine, and everyone feels sorry for their relatives, even if they're pot-headed. Our Putin is 100% right to feel so sorry for Ukrainian civilians, and I haven't even mentioned the owners of luxury real estate in Europe. It's a picture—half the country is potential traitors! It's more accurate to call this war a civil war.
    1. +9
      6 July 2026 08: 04
      Quote: Couch General
      We have a very large population of Ukrainians living in our country since Soviet times – look at the names of those around us.

      And there are a lot of Russians in Ukraine, look at their names, including those from the Ukrainian Armed Forces... They also turn out to be potential traitors, in your opinion?
      1. +4
        6 July 2026 09: 22
        With the start of the Second World War, it was assumed that not only Russians from the Ukrainian Armed Forces, but also Ukrainians from the Ukrainian Armed Forces would begin to defect en masse to Russia's side.
        In this regard, since the beginning of the Central Military District, at least four combat units have been created within the structure of the Russian security agencies:
        - battalion of Maxim Krivonos,
        - Bohdan Khmelnytsky's battalion,
        - Martin Pushkar's squad,
        - Alexander Matrosov's detachment.
        It was assumed that these combat units would be formed from Ukrainian prisoners of war, and would consist entirely of 350 to 550 people according to battalion strength.
        How much have we heard about these combat units?
      2. +2
        6 July 2026 12: 59
        So, in your opinion, they are potential traitors?
        Oh, Nikolay! That's how it turned out, honestly! bully There are traitors all around, all around! laughing
      3. 0
        6 July 2026 14: 41
        In Vladivostok, the absolute majority are Ukrainians. A friend from Moscow teased me, "You're all runaway fugitives here."
    2. +9
      6 July 2026 09: 28
      Everyone feels sorry for their relatives, even if they are pot-headed

      My best friend is an ethnic Ukrainian. Right after the Second World War started, his relatives there called him and, choking with obscenities, screamed into the phone about how they would all come here in NATO tanks and slaughter everyone here, young and old, and him and his family first and foremost... A fraternal people, you say? Relatives?
      1. +2
        6 July 2026 12: 08
        Quote: paul3390
        Everyone feels sorry for their relatives, even if they are pot-headed

        My best friend is an ethnic Ukrainian. Right after the Second World War started, his relatives there called him and, choking with obscenities, screamed into the phone about how they would all come here in NATO tanks and slaughter everyone here, young and old, and him and his family first and foremost... A fraternal people, you say? Relatives?

        So, their Soviet upbringing only slightly covered up their hatred of Russia?
        1. +5
          6 July 2026 14: 19
          If a person lacks firm convictions and a fixed view of what's happening, even someone born in the Soviet Union can be easily and casually brainwashed by 40 years of rabid propaganda...
          1. -1
            6 July 2026 15: 39
            Quote: paul3390
            If a person does not have firm convictions and a settled view of what is happening

            So, Soviet education didn't give people firm convictions and a clear perspective on what was happening? If they were easily persuaded in their old age?

            How old are your friend and his relatives - well over 60?
            1. +3
              6 July 2026 15: 59
              Quote: your1970
              So, Soviet education didn’t provide firm convictions and a clear view of what was happening?

              No. It didn't. There were many examples of the opposite of what was declared!
            2. +2
              6 July 2026 15: 59
              No, not much. Just 60. Do you think that even a good education can inoculate you 100% against stupidity for life? Unfortunately, that's far from true. It all depends on the individual. And people are all different...
              1. -2
                7 July 2026 06: 50
                Quote: paul3390
                Here, everything depends greatly on the person himself.

                What do you mean, "from oneself"? It depends on one's social environment, one's upbringing from infancy, then school... But the most important thing is the example of one's parents, one's family. It's there that one becomes "oneself." One isn't born with a set of views and habits.
          2. Eug
            +4
            6 July 2026 18: 36
            It's not just propaganda. Many pro-Russian Ukrainians perceived the events of 2014 exactly as I described above. And love isn't far from hate...
        2. +6
          6 July 2026 15: 58
          Quote: your1970
          So, their Soviet upbringing only slightly covered up their hatred of Russia?

          Exactly. It only slightly covered a lot of other things, and then it fell off like leaves from the trees in autumn.
      2. +7
        6 July 2026 13: 25
        My best friend is an ethnic Ukrainian.
        My mother is Ukrainian, what should I do now? Tell me, please? Damn, is it really that obvious who started all this and who benefits from this carnage?
        1. +1
          6 July 2026 14: 20
          It might be clear to me. But is it clear to my former brothers in mind on the other side of the front?
          1. +5
            6 July 2026 14: 34
            It might be clear to me
            Pavel! Honestly, I don't know! I just don't know how to answer your question! Yes, my mother is Ukrainian, born in Tiraspol, my father is from Vladimirshchyna. Have you heard of Muromtsevo? I was born in Moscow. What a mess. What's the main thing? Half the Soviet Union is like me!
            1. +1
              6 July 2026 18: 10
              VikNik definitely won't shoot me. I won't shoot him either.
              1. 0
                6 July 2026 18: 18
                VikNik definitely won't shoot at me.
                Why such confidence?
                I'm into it too.
                I believe in that.
              2. +4
                6 July 2026 18: 30
                also
                I really want to say: "Guys, let's live in peace, okay?" Do Putin and Zelensky want to beat each other up? Sure, but why destroy people?
              3. +1
                7 July 2026 09: 15
                Quote: 3x3zsave
                VikNik definitely won't shoot me. I won't shoot him either.

                During the Civil War, a father shot at his children, a brother killed a brother - so don't say never.
                Remember "The Forty-First"...
          2. +5
            6 July 2026 14: 41
            on the other side of the front?
            Want to know my opinion? They just pitted us against each other! Beat as many Slavs as possible!!!!
            1. +4
              6 July 2026 15: 02
              We simply have to acknowledge the obvious: a civil war is underway. Despite the fact that we are technically two different countries. It was inevitable after the collapse of the Soviet Union, but at that point, the morons who had risen to power everywhere had far more pressing matters, like carving up the remaining great legacy. But this fascinating process has finally concluded, the former national property has found its final owners, and now it's time for the previously postponed processes to begin...
              1. +6
                6 July 2026 15: 14
                We just have to admit the obvious - there is a civil war going on.
                Pavel! I've been writing about this since the 22nd. No one needed this massacre!!! And what will we achieve? Residents of the *liberated* areas are already indignant at the dominance of migrants!!! Are we bringing this peace? We, pardon me, but we've had enough of our *friendship*!
                1. +2
                  6 July 2026 15: 16
                  Quote: ArchiPhil
                  Nobody needed this massacre.

                  What do you propose? Capitulate?
                  1. +3
                    6 July 2026 15: 22
                    What do you propose? Capitulate?
                    Do I look like a president? I don't know. There was no need to start. And you know? It's like a street fight. If you start, fight!
                    1. 0
                      6 July 2026 15: 37
                      Quote: ArchiPhil
                      Like in a street fight. Start it, fight!

                      I know this very well, I learned this lesson as a child.
                      1. +1
                        6 July 2026 15: 49
                        I know this very well, I learned this lesson as a child.
                        Then who am I teaching? I loved to fight on the ice!
              2. -1
                6 July 2026 15: 42
                Quote: paul3390
                the former national property has acquired final owners,
                with what fright?
                Or do you seriously think that the US and the EU are just giving money to Ukraine, and not changing the owners in country 404?
                1. +4
                  6 July 2026 16: 01
                  Are you sure you know the real owners of this property? what
                  1. 0
                    7 July 2026 09: 17
                    Quote: paul3390
                    Are you sure you know the real owners of this property? what

                    It's enough for me that Kalomoisky and Mindich consider themselves to be like that, and Azerbaijan is throwing tantrums over Ukraine's gas stations.
              3. +2
                6 July 2026 15: 56
                Quote: paul3390
                It was inevitable after the collapse of the Soviet Union—but at that point, the thugs who had risen to power everywhere had far more pressing matters, like carving up the remaining great legacy. But this fascinating process has finally concluded, the former national property has found its final owners, and now it's time for the previously postponed processes to begin...

                Well done, Pavel! Well done!
                1. +3
                  6 July 2026 18: 39
                  Well, what about me? It's clear to everyone that the borders of the former Soviet Union don't suit either side. And that applies to all the republics. And especially, they don't suit Russia... Because administrative borders within a single state are completely different from borders between independent states. Sooner or later, this issue would have to be resolved. But then again, there's more to come.
                  1. -1
                    7 July 2026 10: 31
                    Quote: paul3390
                    Well, what about me? It's clear to everyone that the borders of the former USSR don't suit either side.

                    On the one hand, yes, it seems so. On the other hand, the USSR without Poland and Finland was doing quite well. And the Russian Empire didn't have Kaliningrad. Russia, Ukraine, Belarus - yes, the foundation of Russia. The rest is a moot point. The point is in people and resources - necessary for something, the borders themselves are just a line on the map. Why do you need Moldova or Tajikistan? Just so you have something? Does the reserve warm your pocket?
              4. +5
                6 July 2026 18: 15
                We just have to admit the obvious: there is a civil war going on.
                Subscribe!
                1. -2
                  7 July 2026 09: 20
                  Quote: 3x3zsave
                  We just have to admit the obvious: there is a civil war going on.
                  Subscribe!

                  Civil war has opposite ideologies - when for IDEA You can smash your enemy's baby's head against the stove.
                  There is no such idea at the moment in principle.
            2. +1
              6 July 2026 18: 42
              Quote: ArchiPhil
              They just pitted us against each other!

              Well, we let ourselves be pitted against each other, especially on that side.
              1. +1
                6 July 2026 18: 50
                especially from that side.
                And with ours? In general, I agree.
                1. +3
                  6 July 2026 19: 03
                  Quote: ArchiPhil
                  And with ours?

                  Well, I don't recall any slogans calling for the extermination of Ukrainians by any means necessary. But the main slogan of the Maidan was "death to Russians," and in various variations.
                  1. -1
                    6 July 2026 19: 08
                    Well, I don't remember any slogans that called for the destruction of Ukrainians.
                    Have you ever been to a football game? To a hockey game? 1985, CSKA Moscow was hosting Sokol Kyiv. What were they shouting from the stands?
                    1. +1
                      6 July 2026 19: 12
                      I was quite young then and wasn't particularly interested in sports matches.
                      1. +2
                        6 July 2026 19: 19
                        I was quite young then and wasn't particularly interested in sports matches.
                        If I reproduce this, I'll be banned immediately. Believe me, these were unpleasant chants, even though hockey is attended by a cultured audience. bully
                      2. +2
                        6 July 2026 19: 22
                        Well, in general, fans, especially football fans, are a kind of subculture, and the fact that they shout things about their opponents that are, of course, prohibited by the rules of the World Cup is no secret to me.
                      3. +1
                        6 July 2026 19: 31
                        football
                        No, no, my friend! These are hockey fans, especially... 1985.
                        bully
                      4. 0
                        6 July 2026 19: 23
                        matches
                        I remember Phil Esposito's legendary fall in the '72 Super Series and the stadium's standing ovation! That's what the fans in the Soviet Union were like! Believe me, that hockey was worth it!!!
              2. 0
                6 July 2026 19: 44
                Quote: guest
                allowed themselves to be pitted against each other

                Or did you take advantage of the moment to solve a whole series of problems?
      3. 0
        6 July 2026 19: 19
        I remember my former boss, a fervent patriot, visiting relatives in Minsk and hanging out with his cousin, a Zmagar fighter who was almost like a Banderite. And yet, both had Ukrainian last names...
    3. +3
      6 July 2026 18: 55
      Quote: Couch General
      And everyone has relatives left in Ukraine, and everyone feels sorry for their relatives, even if they are pot-headed.

      Personally, I don't feel sorry for them.
      1. +3
        6 July 2026 19: 15
        Personally, I don't feel sorry for them.
        I wouldn't be so categorical.
        1. +2
          6 July 2026 19: 19
          I was born there and spent part of my childhood there, but if I received an order from the Supreme Commander to launch a nuclear strike on these places, I would carry it out without hesitation.
  9. + 13
    6 July 2026 06: 33
    What's the article about? The title says "betrayal" and "capitalism." And the article is about the outskirts for the millionth time.
    For example, West Germany seized East Germany, which Gorbachev, the darling, had quietly betrayed. And Russia could have reclaimed its ancestral lands, but no, they came up with denazification and demilitarization. So what now?
    Enough traitors. Rewatch the video ending with the words, "God bless America."
    1. +1
      6 July 2026 12: 10
      Quote: Gardamir
      For example, the FRG captured the GDR, which Gorbachev, the darling, betrayed without any fuss or fuss.

      I have a strong feeling that they wanted exactly the same scenario as with the GDR - the top brass would hand Ukraine over wholesale to the Russian Federation.
      But it did not grow together.
      1. +5
        6 July 2026 13: 06
        But it didn't work out
        Why? Both of them know how to fight! The article? Well, typical Staver!
      2. +3
        6 July 2026 13: 20
        They got it all mixed up. They should have negotiated first, and then... And then they started. Negotiations were scheduled a week later, but they were too late...
        1. +4
          6 July 2026 19: 49
          They got it all mixed up. They should have negotiated first, and then.
          Bravo! How late I appreciated your comment! good
    2. +3
      6 July 2026 15: 18
      Quote: Gardamir
      Gorbachev is a sweetheart, he betrayed without any fuss or fuss.

      If he had sold it, he would have simply given it away. 😠
    3. +1
      6 July 2026 18: 44
      Quote: Gardamir
      in the title, "betrayal", "capitalism." And in the article, for the millionth time, about outskirts.

      Has it ever occurred to you that these two terms are actually synonyms? It's not for nothing that they elevated the main traitor (Mazepa) to the rank of father of the nation.
      1. +6
        6 July 2026 18: 55
        Russia's supreme ruler, Kolchak, served England. President Yeltsin handed Honecker over to a Western court. How did the residents of Kherson, who had recently happily received Russian passports, feel when they learned they were being kept?
        1. 0
          6 July 2026 18: 58
          Quote: Gardamir
          Russia's supreme ruler, Kolchak, served England. President Yeltsin handed Honecker over to a Western court.

          And why did you give me these two 💩 as examples of what?
          1. +2
            6 July 2026 19: 52
            as examples of what?
            As for the fact that we also have this product, pardon my French, but it is enough.
  10. + 15
    6 July 2026 06: 57
    They divided us so much that Ukrainians practically cursed their heroic ancestors, betrayed their grandfathers and great-grandfathers who died in WWII... They betrayed and chose to stand alongside those who once destroyed Ukrainians.

    On the night of July 1–2, 2026, Russia launched the most massive attack on Kyiv since the beginning of the Second World War. Thirty-one people were killed and 102 were wounded. Kyiv declared a day of mourning on July 3.
    I'm about to get a ton of downvotes because we don't want to know about it - we prefer to think that Ukrainians hate us not for this reason, but because of someone's orders.
    1. + 10
      6 July 2026 11: 38
      We're tied by blood. Even those who were "ours or for us" now hate us all, indiscriminately. Almost everyone in Ukraine has lost a friend or relative. And you can try until you're hoarse and foaming at the mouth to prove that we're good and innocent, while Zelensky and the Nazis, who, with the help of the West, started this whole mess, are bad and guilty. At best, they'll just spit in your face, and at worst, they'll kill you. That's reality. They're stuck with the axiom: the Russians killed us. I repeat: we were tied to a cow. That's how the mafia works. The forces that wrote the script for everything that's happening today will see it through. Nothing and no one is stopping them yet, and it seems no one is going to ruin their script. You can't win a war with sniveling and defensive tactics.
      1. -3
        6 July 2026 12: 34
        Quote: alex_410
        Almost everyone in Ukraine has lost a friend or relative. And you can try your best to prove that we're the good guys and innocent, while Zelensky and the Nazis, who, with the help of the West, started this whole mess, are the bad guys and innocent.

        I will now burst into tears from your compassion for those who want the death of our children, women, old people... you have seen little of how they killed our people. hi
        1. +5
          6 July 2026 14: 41
          You don't seem to get it, sir. What the hell kind of compassion was I talking about? From 1978 to 1979 (immediately after training in Bagrationovsk), I served as a sergeant in Skole, Lviv Oblast. It's in the Carpathians, the worst nest of Bandera's vipers. I could tell you a lot about how they treated us even back then. I have only one attitude toward the hardened Bandera, the Nazis, and their sympathizers: they deserve to be hanged. And preferably publicly. You won't catch them all, but the rest will tremble in fear and gnash their teeth at home under the covers. The half-cut forest will grow back. When Khrushchev released and pardoned these monsters, Stalin turned over in his grave. I have no compassion for this scum, and I cannot have any. If we don't finish them off now, their descendants, who will have to fight again (no doubt) against the younger generation of these monsters, will never forgive us.
          1. +1
            6 July 2026 15: 23
            Quote: alex_410
            When Khrushchev released and pardoned these freaks,Stalin turned over in his grave..

            Well, that was one of Khrushchev's goals with his de-Stalinization. 😠
          2. 0
            7 July 2026 01: 09
            The first amnesties for Banderites occurred under Stalin. And in 1955, not only Banderites were amnestied, but also Vlasovites, the "Forest Brothers," and policemen, elders, and burgomasters. However, the amnesty did not extend to those involved in massacres and executions.
      2. 0
        6 July 2026 15: 20
        Quote: alex_410
        Almost everyone in Ukraine has had someone they know or relative die.

        Is that the only place where people die? They don't engage in terrorism here? 😠
      3. -1
        7 July 2026 01: 43
        Quote: alex_410
        I repeat - we were tied to a cow.

        Until they tied the Germans with blood, they didn't abandon the idea of ​​killing Russians. They've simply killed very few Ukrainians so far, even if they still haven't abandoned the ban on the Russian language and Orthodoxy.
  11. +6
    6 July 2026 07: 51
    We need to shout about the huge lines at the gas stations! Why are they silent? Who ordered the silence about the lack of gas? No information on where to go, where to fill up, how long it will last, and what to do??? That's where the first betrayal lies, the closest one, it affects the majority. And then they wonder why there are so many fakes and fake news online. Because the government is silent, and in doing so, it's lying to the people. What else can we talk about?
    1. man
      +1
      6 July 2026 08: 20
      Quote: Vadim S
      We need to shout about the huge lines at gas stations! Why are they silent? Who told us to keep quiet about the lack of gas? No information on where to go, where to fill up, how long it will last, and what to do???

      Vladimir Ilyich is to blame for this...remember "mail, telegraph, telephone..."? And he forgot about the gas stations. request . that's what our rulers are taking advantage of smile
    2. +1
      6 July 2026 13: 29
      Because the government is silent and lying to the people. What more can we talk about?
      And whose power is this? Ours? I'm afraid it's far from ours!
    3. -5
      7 July 2026 01: 49
      Quote: Vadim S
      We need to shout about the huge lines at gas stations! Why are they silent?

      Just recently, it was necessary to shout that the chicken eggs had disappeared. Even earlier, I was called upon to shout that all transport in Russia would come to a standstill in the fall due to sanctions. But in 2014, such a Kramchal resident bought all his rubles in euros at their peak, while I then sold 400 dollars almost at their peak. The crises of 2008, 2014, and others like them taught Russians that it's better to listen to Putin than to his enemies.
  12. 0
    6 July 2026 08: 16
    I'm amazed at how easily people commit treason these days. This certainly wasn't the case in the Soviet Union. There were traitors, but they were few and far between, because you had to break yourself completely to take that step, meaning renounce everything you'd absorbed with your mother's milk.
    1. +2
      6 July 2026 08: 24
      Quote: Sergey Novikov_3
      There were traitors, but they were few and far between.

      What time period are you talking about? If it was 1941-45, the death toll was in the hundreds of thousands!
      1. +1
        6 July 2026 13: 26
        Quote: kalibr
        Quote: Sergey Novikov_3
        There were traitors, but they were few and far between.

        What time period are you talking about? If it was 1941-45, the death toll was in the hundreds of thousands!

        The first thing that came to mind was "The Fate of Man." "Everyone thinks according to the degree of their depravity." wink
        Did you label all prisoners as traitors? Hundreds of thousands of people at the beginning of the war suddenly found themselves without leaders, without weapons, without ammunition, without communications, without food. And yet, there were many who hated the Soviet regime. Less than 20 years had passed since the formation of the USSR.
        How would you react if bombs and shells rained down on you while you were peacefully sleeping? That's exactly how my father experienced the war in summer camp. And then he broke out of encirclement and led soldiers dressed down to German uniforms and armed with both our own and captured weapons, all the way to Smolensk. One of my uncles went missing in action. He could also be labeled a traitor. Thirty years later, my father visited the mass grave of another fallen uncle and saw the name of the missing man. Two uncles in one grave.
        Our history is rich with events. Yesterday marked the anniversary of the start of the Battle of Kursk. My father-in-law was wounded there, then went on to capture Berlin and liberate Prague. He bequeathed a soldier's pyramid with a red star on his grave. He comes from a family of those who were persecuted.
        An article about capitalism in Russia and the fact that "a fish rots from the head."
        1. +3
          6 July 2026 13: 29
          Quote: There was a mammoth
          Did you register all prisoners as traitors?

          No, only those who fought with weapons in hand on the side of the Germans!
      2. 0
        6 July 2026 15: 41
        Quote: kalibr
        If we talk about the period 1941-45, then the count was in the hundreds of thousands!

        So, maybe you could tell us how these pieces 💩 carried out terrorist attacks in the cities of our country from 1941 to 1945?
        1. +2
          6 July 2026 15: 50
          Quote: guest
          So, maybe you could tell us how these pieces 💩 carried out terrorist attacks in the cities of our country from 1941 to 1945?

          What terrorist attacks? They fought on the front lines as part of the Waffen-SS. I had a piece of my own here, I think it was called "The Garbage Pail of Europe." And it described how many, who, and where... Although they also sent spies and saboteurs into the rear. True, if you believe the film "The Road to Saturn," they all later defected to our side. But that's a film...
      3. +1
        6 July 2026 19: 05
        Greetings, Vyacheslav!
        Well, you're a bit hasty. Among the more than a million Soviet citizens who defected to the enemy, traitors constitute a small fraction. The bulk of the group consists of hidden enemies (which is not the same thing) and simply cowards who, out of weakness, sided with the temporary victors. Traitors, on the other hand, are the blood of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) and the Komsomol, who consciously betrayed what they had fervently served.
        1. -1
          6 July 2026 19: 46
          Quote: Victor Leningradets
          The core of the group consists of hidden enemies (which is not the same thing) and simply cowards who, out of weakness, sided with the temporary victors. The traitors, however, are the blood of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) and the Komsomol, who deliberately betrayed what they had fervently served.

          How do we separate them? What are the selection criteria, and how effective can they be today?
          1. 0
            7 July 2026 06: 55
            What are the selection criteria and how effective can they be today?

            Very simple:
            - A hidden enemy acts out of hatred for the Motherland. Always tries to cause harm (not knowing whether he'll have time in the future). In war, he directly defects to the enemy when the opportunity presents itself.
            - Those who find themselves in the circumstances of committing treason are random people, without convictions, simply saving their skin or property.
            - A traitor is a person who tries to monetize his position as much as possible, trying to find happiness and material well-being from the enemy at the expense of damage to the Motherland.
            1. +2
              7 July 2026 07: 09
              Quote: Victor Leningradets
              Very simple:

              This is precisely not simple. HOW can this be detected in a specific person? How can their true motives and circumstances be discovered? Should they be hanged on the rack?
              1. -1
                7 July 2026 08: 16
                SMERSH and the Special Department somehow managed.
                Result:
                Most of those who defected to the enemy during the war were, after being vetted, sent to work on the Motherland's construction projects, or to develop the Far East and the Far North. And local torturers are ready to publicly quarter or impale everyone (apparently suggesting to the younger generation what to do with them later). Cases of entire units of collaborators defecting to the partisans are also known.
                Things were much worse with hidden enemies. The particularly bloodthirsty ones, those caught and shedding much blood, were indeed executed, but the idiotic idea that the forest brothers, Banderites, and other nationalists could be "re-educated" for the most part triumphed over common sense.
                Well, the conversation with the traitors was short - the execution of Vlasov and the others was a calculated finale to the betrayal on the part of the victors.
                1. 0
                  7 July 2026 08: 24
                  Quote: Victor Leningradets
                  SMERSH and the Special Department somehow managed.

                  SOMEHOW... yes... exactly somehow!
    2. +5
      6 July 2026 10: 05
      Quote: Sergey Novikov_3
      I'm amazed at how easily people commit adultery these days. This certainly wasn't the case in the Soviet Union.

      Read the letters of the future Marshal Sergei Semenovich Biryuzov from the front to his wife, about the mass betrayal, including of workers, collective farmers, and Red Army soldiers.
      From a religious point of view (let's say so) - mentally healthy people do not exist, they only differ in the degree of insanity.
    3. +3
      6 July 2026 15: 26
      Quote: Sergey Novikov_3
      I am amazed at the ease with which people nowadays commit adultery.

      And it doesn’t surprise me if such betrayal is still glorified in some well-known center.
    4. -1
      7 July 2026 01: 55
      Quote: Sergey Novikov_3
      This definitely didn't happen in the Union.

      At Stalingrad alone, more Hiwis were encircled than the Ukrainians captured, recruited as saboteurs, and recruited as Red Army Cadets during the entire period of the Second World War. Compare the size of the Red Army Cadets to Vlasov's ROA. It was somewhere between a company and a battalion, and two full-fledged divisions. In this regard, Putin is at least an order of magnitude more successful than Stalin. A third or a quarter of the population fled Ukraine. Although, frankly, this latter fact isn't Putin's doing, but a consequence of the idiotic policy of persecuting the Russian language by Crimean Tatars, Jews, and Armenians in the Ukrainian leadership, on the advice of British, Polish, and German intelligence services.
  13. +6
    6 July 2026 08: 50
    There have always been and always will be traitors; it's inevitable. Those wronged by the authorities can be found everywhere; it's fertile ground for recruitment. But there's a sense of collusion, and it permeates many things. For example, a helicopter pilot who killed his comrades received a passport from a country with which we haven't severed diplomatic relations... European arms suppliers—the same thing, embassies in these countries aren't closed. What's more, they produce these weapons from our own metals, rare earth elements, gas, oil—and with our own money, left in their banks by some clever guy... A gas tanker is destroyed—forgiven. Houses are destroyed, people are killed—forgiven. Every day, guys die at the front—these are true patriots, the salt of this earth, young men and women who need to have children in batches of 10, because it's these patriots who will raise a generation with love and devotion to this land. Not these false patriots in corners, shitting on the motherland, no. Here's a simple question: how much more valuable are the lives of these people than the lives of those same Europeans? Those same Europeans who, time after time, bring death and destruction, because of whom tens of millions have died and continue to die today? Is this part of the European continent really so precious that we, who can complete this stage of our latest campaign to the east in an hour, are willing to preserve it at the cost of our own lives? Who can answer the question: So where are they—the traitors?
  14. + 15
    6 July 2026 09: 24
    Can I ask a question? Those military personnel, security forces, intelligence officers, and others who swore allegiance to the USSR and didn't come out to defend it—who are they? Traitors or disloyal? Or is this "something else"? Like, "there was no order"?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      7 July 2026 02: 02
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      Those military personnel, security forces, special services employees, etc. who swore allegiance to the USSR and did not come out to defend it, who are they?

      Read Lebed's memoirs? He was ordered to defend the USSR or the CPSU. You remember, back in 1991, everything was in the hands of private cooperatives, not those who served the state.
  15. +7
    6 July 2026 09: 39
    Against the backdrop of mass revelations and announcements of stolen budget funds by officials of all stripes, many people, especially young people, are blurring the line between betrayal of the Motherland and theft. If you can, you're cool, you're trendy! If you can't, you're a loser! Children blame their parents for failing to provide them with apartments, cars, or a good inheritance. A rift is emerging between parents and children. A growing number of embittered people believe they were deceived. This is the environment where it's easy to find people capable of betraying the Motherland.
  16. + 12
    6 July 2026 09: 53
    We shouldn't even talk about betrayal openly anymore, we should shout it out. In every case, we should shout it out,

    No, of course, it's necessary to shout about every video of an incoming flight, and it's safe. Shouting about those who set fire to relay cabinets and communication towers is possible—it's necessary, and it's also safe. But shouting about the bigger guys—the two-dealing oligarchs, the high-ranking thieves, the failed members of the power vertical—is dangerous, as it risks finding themselves next to extremists like Strelkov or Udaltsov. And the author understands this perfectly well, and his righteous anger won't extend beyond "cabinet arsonists."
  17. +1
    6 July 2026 10: 06
    People formed a state to defend the interests of their ethnic group. That is, the state is a superstructure that serves its people. And the highest governing body of the state is the people. To ensure the functioning of the state mechanism, specialists—officials—are hired. They report to the state. The result is a pyramid: the people are at the apex, the state lies beneath the people, and the officials are at the bottom.
    But now it's the other way around: the interests of officials at the top of the pyramid are ensured by the state, and all of this is financed by the people...
    1. +2
      6 July 2026 12: 23
      Quote: Alexander X
      И It turns out to be a pyramid: the top is the people, below the people is the state, and the lowest level is the officials...
      But now everything is the other way around:

      In which country was this true? Don't suggest the USSR—it was completely different there...
    2. +1
      6 July 2026 14: 01
      Quote: Alexander X
      People formed a state to defend the interests of their ethnic group. That is, a state is a superstructure that serves its people.

      Marxism? No, I haven't heard of it. wink
      1. 0
        6 July 2026 15: 36
        Quote: Was Mammoth
        Quote: Alexander X
        People formed a state to defend the interests of their ethnic group. That is, a state is a superstructure that serves its people.

        Marxism? No, I haven't heard of it. wink

        This is not Marxism, it has three components - the base, the superstructure and the intelligentsia.
        1. +1
          6 July 2026 16: 52
          Quote from Etwas
          This is not Marxism, it has three components - the base, the superstructure and the intelligentsia.

          Are you playing your trump cards? wink Let's put it more simply: political relations between classes. Materialism is at the core. But the guy's a good guy!
    3. 0
      6 July 2026 15: 47
      Quote: Alexander X
      And so it turns out to be a pyramid: the top is the people, below the people is the state, and the lowest level is the officials...

      This is how it was in Athens under Pericles!
  18. +2
    6 July 2026 10: 23
    Quote: Alexander X
    People formed a state to defend the interests of their ethnic group. That is, the state is a superstructure that serves its people. And the highest governing body of the state is the people. To ensure the functioning of the state mechanism, specialists—officials—are hired. They report to the state. The result is a pyramid: the people are at the apex, the state lies beneath the people, and the officials are at the bottom.
    But now it's the other way around: the interests of officials at the top of the pyramid are ensured by the state, and all of this is financed by the people...

    Alexander, is this nonsense you're spouting your own thoughts, or did someone else tell you that? If so, give up. It's not your thing. Don't embarrass yourself.
  19. -7
    6 July 2026 11: 02
    Well, if it's treason, cut your last cucumber! The boyars are bad – the people and the tsar are wonderful! And who forced these people to skip school and instead of starting their own businesses, join the security forces or work as security guards every other day? Who forced the Bashmachkins from fence-building research institutes to vote for United Russia out of fear of being deprived of their small but good salaries? Who paid bribes and bought the services of bandits when they could have tried to show will and resolve issues according to the law? Who forced them to take out preferential mortgages and consumer loans, living beyond their means? Who forced them to hire migrant workers to clean the streets where they could have grabbed a broom and shoveled the snow themselves? Who forced them to rent apartments to them because they wanted to live off the rent rather than work? Who tied people to a TV with a beer bottle and told them not to learn languages ​​if they believed there was no decent work for them in their own country? Who, finally, forced you to go like sad sheep to the military registration and enlistment office in the fall of 2022 and die for God knows who, instead of heading to the nearest border crossing and at least trying to cross? You yourselves inflated this bubble of military state capitalism, which in the current circumstances can honestly be called fascism (which isn't "war and Germans," but corporate statism with fairy tales for the plebs about foreign enemies, wise rulers, and heroic grandfathers). Just like today's Ukrainians. But many of them at least tried to change something, became migrant workers, and somehow managed to get by within their own oligarchy.

    Of course, all countries and cultures have their fair share of naive idiots and lazybones. But if you leave Central Africa aside, only Russia is home to such a multitude of characters who fiercely hate those who actually provide them with work and love to think that only the Tsar sits in the Kremlin 24/7, caring for all the poor and needy. Their self-help initiatives are as rare as those of cabbages.

    You ask someone to go on a business trip abroad for a couple of months for money that is many times greater than their income. 95% of people say, "No, I won't go." - Why? - My wife won't let me, I have no one to look after the cat, my blood pressure has risen to 135/90, I can't find my passport, and, anyway, a relative here promised me a job as a technician on duty every three days in six months. - Well, at least you should see the world. - No, I don't feel like it, I've already been to Egypt twice for a resort. And, anyway, you have dog-headed people living there. And a month later you hear them telling tales about you, how bourgeois and secret Chabad member so-and-so is living it up in decaying Gayropa, while so-and-so—an honest Russian worker—is vegetating because of the evil globalists and forging a shield for the motherland (yes, on the couch in the duty room of his small town of Foolov). This is pure Randism.
    1. + 12
      6 July 2026 11: 11
      Your entire comment is filled with a pathological hatred for the humble "working man." It's even unpleasant to discuss this topic.
    2. 0
      7 July 2026 02: 15
      Quote: mErLin68
      You ask a person to go on a business trip abroad for a couple of months for money that is many times greater than his income.

      I was applying for a job at a large company. I had a separate interview with a local adjuster. During the interview, he received a call asking him to go to a neighboring country the following week for a part-time job. When I learned the results of the interview, I realized from a conversation in the office that my interviewer had gone on a drinking binge. He's a good specialist, valued by Dutch investors who don't let him fire him. But he regularly goes on drinking binges and disappears for weeks, losing his salary. It was amusing how the Dutch top manager spoke respectfully to this man, dismissing all his other Russian subordinates so as not to interfere with the one-on-one conversation, while the lesser Russian bosses treated him with mocking condescension.
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. 0
    6 July 2026 11: 40
    Isn't it a bit late to cry out for betrayal? The main betrayal took place long ago, and many were satisfied with it. Including those who took the oath.
  22. Owl
    -2
    6 July 2026 13: 19
    Only the "supreme measure," albeit with a one-year deferment and a retrial of the "case," but the State Duma will not accept this, since it will also affect them and their "sponsors."
  23. +3
    6 July 2026 14: 18
    You're something else, sir! Judging from your words, the ENTIRE Russian leadership (the Duma, the government) are considered enemies of the country. Be careful! They'll put you in jail!
    1. Owl
      +3
      6 July 2026 17: 56
      Judging by their "work," yes. The state is at war under the "leadership" of oligarchs, and the population's standard of living is declining. They don't even want to solve the fuel crisis by giving up speculative profits.
  24. +6
    6 July 2026 15: 18
    Quote: alex_410
    I can only have one attitude towards the stubborn Bandera, the Nazis and those who sympathize with them - they deserve to be hanged.

    Well then, I'm sorry. hi ...I'm a slowpoke. smile
    I was on business trips to the Lviv region back in Gorbachev's time...even then, Banderites in Lviv were openly showing off their UPA uniforms...which was a real shock to me then. what
  25. +2
    6 July 2026 15: 19
    Quote: paul3390
    Everyone feels sorry for their relatives, even if they are pot-headed

    My best friend is an ethnic Ukrainian. Right after the Second World War started, his relatives there called him and, choking with obscenities, screamed into the phone about how they would all come here in NATO tanks and slaughter everyone here, young and old, and him and his family first and foremost... A fraternal people, you say? Relatives?

    What's surprising is that, even during the Directory era, the locals were very fond of the idea of ​​independence, but Lenin, who was determined to keep Ukraine in place, had a powerful trump card in the form of local workers. Now, there's nothing to offer; explaining to the population that our profiteers are no better than theirs isn't working, and it looks ridiculous. That's why there are so many absurd slogans to explain the reasons for the SVO.
  26. +2
    6 July 2026 15: 44
    Quote: 3x3zsave
    Hello, Vyacheslav Olegovich!

    Good afternoon, dear Anton! There's no telling what they sell, who they rip off, and how. Just now, in Penza, a woman forged documents claiming she was in need, received 350000 rubles in poverty relief, used the money to open an artistic blacksmithing workshop, and... was sentenced to six years in prison!
    1. 0
      7 July 2026 02: 19
      Quote: kalibr
      She received 350000 rubles in poverty relief, used the money to open a workshop for artistic forging and... was jailed for 6 years!

      These 350,000 were a better use of government funds than many other measures of state support for production and exports. The state would have recouped these 350,000 in taxes within two years.
      1. +1
        7 July 2026 06: 43
        Quote: gsev
        These 350,000 were a better use of government funds than many other measures of state support for production and exports. The state would have recouped these 350,000 in taxes within two years.

        I think so too, but... the law is the law!
  27. +1
    6 July 2026 16: 13
    Quote: ArchiPhil
    Gorbachev came and oops! No country?

    No, but in fact that's how it is...Gorbachev came and the USSR disappeared. request
  28. +6
    6 July 2026 16: 18
    Before 2014, everything was almost exactly like Ukraine's in terms of propaganda. A sharp tilt toward the Soviet past, a restoration of old ideals after 2022. Now imagine there was no SVO. Monuments to Krasnov, Mannerheim, plaques, and so on. Even the "Lenin planted the bombs and only made galoshes" narrative—it's all an echo of post-Soviet ideology. They simply decided to cling to the Soviet past because it became clear that the country would soon be finished, just like Ukraine. That's all.
    The entire ideology of the late 80s and 90s—"Soviet is bad, Western is good." Modern Ukraine grew up on this principle, and half the country lives by it. The younger the population, the more they criticize Soviet things—the influence of all the state propaganda over the past 30 years since the collapse of the USSR is already evident.
    Now the country is facing a paradox. They're governing it capitalistically, and everyone sees and reads how the number of billionaires is growing. Meanwhile, the government is throwing around Soviet slogans.
    1. 0
      7 July 2026 02: 30
      [quote=Мекей Иптышев]Until 2014, everything was almost the same as in Ukraine, in terms of propaganda.[/quote] This isn't because of the SVO. Putin is much smarter than Ukraine's leaders. Having initiated a policy of banning communist propaganda, he conducted a social survey. Moreover, the requirements for the reliability of the results were four times higher than those required by international standards. This included the number of respondents, the reliability of the sample, the adequacy of the questions, and the correctness of the statistical methods for processing the results. Answer: in Russia, propaganda failed to disillusion the people with communist ideology, and the share of supporters of the idea of ​​communism is no lower than in 1990 and possibly even no lower than in 1917. Moreover, there is no difference by any means. The percentage of communists among businessmen is probably higher than among the poor and lumpenproletariat. That's why Putin, unlike the Ukrainian oligarchs and rulers, is afraid to anger the communists by filming new series about the darlings of Kolchak, Semyonov, and Ungern. And Chulpan Khamatova, who didn't understand this, now languishes between the Russian theater in Riga and small stages near Broadway.
  29. +1
    6 July 2026 17: 27
    Only their own betray. That's the basis. When the state hands out perks from collecting tribute or exploiting natural resources, 80% of the population isn't considered "their own." Why is it surprising that subjects are willing to work against the state for pennies or even for free?
    1. -1
      6 July 2026 18: 09
      Quote: Lyokha1979
      then 80% of the population are not "ours".

      But they still receive a lot from the state: pensions, salaries, home repairs, the opportunity to build their own lives. That's a lot! And all it demands in return is loyalty. And most importantly, the severity of the punishment far outweighs the benefits!
      1. +1
        6 July 2026 23: 35
        they receive quite a lot from the state - pensions, salaries, home repairs,
        Everything you mentioned is the state taking away one ruble to return 30 kopecks with pomp. These are more of an irritant factor.
        the opportunity to arrange your own life.
        I don't understand this at all... The state won't interfere with our lives? That's not even a possibility. Every day brings new fines, extortions, and bans.
        And all it requires is loyalty.
        What does "loyalty" mean today? Reporting to the military registration and enlistment office at the first request?
        the severity of the punishment far outweighs the benefit
        I don't think the material aspect is the most important factor here. People turn against the state more for ideological reasons. Another point: for the state, too, "the severity of the punishment far outweighs the benefit." No matter how severe the punishment for explosions and arson, destroyed facilities and equipment cannot be returned. Therefore, instead of empty talk about "the opportunity to build your own lives" and endless prohibitions, it would be more profitable to actually invest in strengthening loyalty.
        1. +2
          7 July 2026 02: 34
          Quote: Lyokha1979
          Every day there are new fines, levies and bans.

          In Russia, it's not state taxes that are more oppressive, but rather the levies imposed on companies affiliated with the state. For example, it's not taxes that are more outraged, but the levies imposed by companies like Honest Sign, Pension Fund, and Platon.
          1. +1
            7 July 2026 09: 26
            levies in favor of quasi-state companies
            I disagree. The "Pension Fund" is a government levy. What about the "recycling fee"? What about the "environmental fee"? What about the self-employment tax? And what about the 22% VAT? Basically, there's no tax-free minimum. You either have to give the state your pennies or be forced out of the law. This doesn't inspire loyalty.
            1. 0
              7 July 2026 15: 23
              Quote: Lyokha1979
              I disagree. The "Pension Fund" is a government levy. What about the "recycling fee"? What about the "environmental fee"? What about the self-employment tax? And what about the 22% VAT? There's no tax-free minimum, really.

              The tax rate for the self-employed is very low. Moreover, reporting for self-employed individuals in Russia is not at all burdensome administratively. Environmental and recycling fees are simply a mechanism to support the auto industry. In China, the entire government apparatus, from the smallest manager to the deputy head of an agricultural district, can be reduced to a salary of $200-$300 so that the savings can be used to offset losses from exporting Chinese trucks trying to compete with KAMAZ. Russia's weakness is its inadequate wage system. Under Yeltsin, the incomes of small traders, taxi drivers, owners of large enterprises, and foreign investors were inflated, at the expense of the salaries of doctors, engineers, scientists, and military personnel. There is no progressive tax system, but there are privileges associated with state support for raw materials exports. The state subsidizes coal transportation in amounts commensurate with export revenues. In fact, the subsidies sometimes exceed the exporter's revenues by twice as much. That's why Trump is making proposals to begin developing rare earth minerals in Russia or to build tunnels under such conditions.
              1. 0
                7 July 2026 15: 56
                The tax for the self-employed is very low.
                4% of turnover for those with a turnover of up to 2,4 million per year isn't so small. The main issue is different. A self-employed person is simply earning a modest living. What has the state done for this person? Nothing. Therefore, any "tax" will be seen as extortion and will be met with hostility.
                The environmental and recycling fee is simply a mechanism to support the auto industry.
                Please understand: I don't care who they support... What bothers me is that they're doing it out of my pocket. The DPRK is a world apart, and I wouldn't always want to emulate it.
                The incomes of small traders, taxi drivers, owners of large enterprises, and foreign investors were inflated to the detriment of the salaries of doctors, engineers, scientists, and military personnel.
                They took away the incomes of "gypsy cabbies and small traders"... Do you see the high salaries of "doctors, engineers, scientists, and military personnel"? I don't either. So, they screwed some and left others unhelped.
                1. -2
                  7 July 2026 22: 58
                  Quote: Lyokha1979
                  What has the state done for this man? Nothing.

                  Nothing in Russia? Doesn't allow Ukrainians to forbid him from speaking his native language. If this girl doesn't allow the Ukrainian mafia from Odessa to sell her to sadistic rapists. People in Russia receive excellent education and medical treatment. 6% of turnover is very little. Moreover, a self-employed person working for a company can only issue checks for their own work, requiring the employer to pay for the purchase of components from their company account. So, a self-employed person's income of $2500 per month in Russia is roughly equivalent to $6000 in Austria or Germany. Although in reality, the person pays for their own tools and transportation costs out of their own pocket. But it's always possible to switch to a sole proprietorship or LLC.
                  1. +1
                    7 July 2026 23: 41
                    He doesn't allow Ukrainians to forbid him from speaking his native language. If this girl doesn't allow the Ukrainian mafia from Odessa to sell her to sadistic rapists.
                    I don't understand your humor. It borders on mockery.
                    In Russia, people are given excellent education and treatment.
                    All this comes at a cost. And it's not always high-quality. This is especially true for medicine. It's a sore subject for me.
                    So, a self-employed person's earnings in Russia of $2500 per month are approximately equal to earnings of $6000 in Austria or Germany.
                    I don't see anywhere near $2500 in the Volga region. I have $1500, of which 50% is expenses.
                    1. -1
                      8 July 2026 15: 11
                      Quote: Lyokha1979
                      I don't see anywhere near $2500 in the Volga region. I have $1500, of which 50% is expenses.
                      After the collapse of the USSR, NATO countries decided to keep wages in the CIS countries below those in North African countries. Around 2007, this level in Uzbekistan was $300 per month. Considering that two years ago, electricians in Afghanistan at Western-funded enterprises earned $500 per month, you only get $250 every month thanks to Putin. Incidentally, the level of education in Russia is very high. A C student in 10th grade at a Moscow school turns into a top student at the Pan American University in Mexico City, who knows the syllabus for a year and a half of study at the Pan American University even before enrolling. A C student in Russia becomes an A student at a Russian school in Kyrgyzstan, and the South Korean government maintains special diplomats in Kyrgyzstan to invite such people to study and work in South Korea.
                      Quote: Lyokha1979
                      The Ukrainian mafia from Odessa sold it to sadistic rapists. I don't understand your humor. It borders on mockery.

                      There's a character online named Kristina Kotova, a slave named Kota from Odessa. These are the infamous slave traders. The assassination attempt on Zakharchenko and the terrorist attack in Crocus, or rather, the terrorists' escape from Crocus, is simply a cover for their main work.
  30. -1
    6 July 2026 18: 06
    Quote: paul3390
    How do you convince a child, for example, that stealing is wrong when the elite are stealing by the trainload, not even by the truckload? How do you explain the concepts of honor and conscience when people around you live happily ever after, completely lacking them?

    It's difficult. But it's possible. You just have to work on yourself first. And many people... are too lazy!
  31. +1
    6 July 2026 21: 00
    Note that the Banderites aren't specifically attacking Barvikha, Rublyovka, or other places where the assets of oligarchs and their friends... well, you know, whose friends. After all, if even one drone gets there, then the war will go the way it should. And when the plebs are dying, then their souls are at peace...
    1. 0
      7 July 2026 14: 18
      Yeah, yeah, yeah... Only there are Pantsirs there and they regularly shoot down drones. Don't make things up.
  32. +7
    6 July 2026 21: 02
    Could you please tell me what to call those former ministers, deputy prime ministers, and other pro-government scum who fled and continue to flee to the West?
    Who brought them into power and how? Who was responsible for them?
    1. -3
      7 July 2026 02: 48
      Quote: Alexander Tkachenko
      Could you please tell me what to call those former ministers, deputy prime ministers and other pro-government scum?

      Putin has to expel various parasites from the power structures. Moreover, he has to contend not only with the legacy of Yeltsin and Gorbachev, but also with the lingering Stalinism and simply the late Brezhnev-era indifference. He has sent some, like Yavlinsky, to blog, others, like Zyuganov, to the impotent Communist Party, others, like Chichvarkin and Khodorkovsky, to Ukraine and London, others, like Khamatova, to the State Department's support of the Riga Russian Theater, and others, like Nemtsov, Berezovsky, and Politkovskaya, as particularly unruly, to the graveyard. It seems to me that Trump and Vance have begun to understand the conditions under which Putin operates, and they are beginning to believe that Vance and Trump need to adopt some of Putin's methods if they truly want to see America, not China, become great again.
      1. 0
        7 July 2026 06: 27
        "Expel him from power structures?" No, that's simply clearing the space of potential competition. And the fight against Boris's legacy looks somehow crooked compared to the Judacenter.
      2. -1
        7 July 2026 07: 02
        Quote: gsev
        not China.

        How well you understand everything. It's rare to see something like this here...
      3. 0
        7 July 2026 14: 15
        gsev
        Who sent Khodorkovsky to Ukraine and Britain?
        What are you talking about? "Nemets" and "Beryozha" were nailed to the ground by their own people. "Nemets" is a sacred sacrifice; they killed him and wanted to dispel this theme at rallies against the "bloody KGB." "Beryozha" was killed after he wrote a letter of repentance to Putin and asked to return to his homeland. Chichvarkin is a minor pawn—Putin has probably never even heard of him. So don't invent things that don't exist.
        Trump and Vance began to understand
        Especially Trump, who's only ever listened to his Zionist kin. And Vance, in general, is squirming like a snake in a frying pan, just to push Rubio out as Trump's successor.
        The Global Syndicate no longer needs Great America. And this Syndicate has already invested in Great China.
        1. +1
          7 July 2026 14: 59
          Quote: futurohunter
          And this Syndicate has already invested in Great China

          Access to China's power structures is closed not only to Western oligarchs but also to wealthy figures like the millionaire Ma. While the world views him as the most successful Chinese person, in China, many see him as a pariah hiding under the protection of Japanese intelligence agencies.
          1. 0
            7 July 2026 19: 46
            You've probably forgotten how, at the Chinese Communist Party Congress, they approached a certain old man, grabbed him by the arms, and led him away. And no one ever saw him again. Well, there are many more such "old men" out there... The direct presence of Western oligarchs in China isn't necessary; a "sixth column" like ours is enough...
            As for "Ali" - like all "successful" Chinese businessmen, he pays off his share of the country's salaries... Otherwise, the triads would have killed him long ago...
            1. -1
              7 July 2026 23: 24
              Quote: futurohunter
              You've probably forgotten how, at the Chinese Communist Party Congress, they approached a certain old man, grabbed him by the arms, and led him away. And no one ever saw him again. Well, there are many more such "old men" out there... The direct presence of Western oligarchs in China isn't necessary; a "sixth column" like ours is enough...
              As for "Ali" - like all "successful" Chinese businessmen, he pays off his share of the country's salaries... Otherwise, the triads would have killed him long ago...

              Are you talking about Hu Jintao? He was 80 years old, but he found the strength to attend the congress. He simply became ill there. His staff was sent to help him, but he refused a stretcher and found the strength to walk to the doctor. In China, he is respected for his breakthrough in the fight against Tibetan and Xinjiang separatists. Furthermore, it was during his reign that China made a powerful breakthrough, transforming its machine tool, aircraft, and military-industrial complexes into industries capable of producing products that could compete with the best from the US, Europe, and Japan.
              1. 0
                8 July 2026 10: 43
                There he simply became ill.
                This is just the official explanation from the Xinhua news agency, supposedly to "keep the trash out of the public eye."
                You are a strange person... Sometimes you put forward absurd explanations, sometimes you believe dubious officialdom...
                The video shows he left against his will. I don't know what he did, but some believe he represented the pro-American faction within the CPC. That's why he was removed from office, to avoid interfering when China's course began to shift dramatically.
                aircraft manufacturing and the military-industrial complex into an industry capable of producing products that can compete with the best models
                What a powerful statement! "Chinese military-industrial products" are still far inferior to the "best global standards." China's aircraft industry is improving, but... they still haven't developed their own turbojet engine. Their combat aircraft are based on foreign designs and also don't yet reach international standards. The Chinese can't independently design a modern airliner, so they outsource their development. Their military and aviation technology "competes" only because of significantly lower prices... Look at which countries are buying it... Yes, they're developing, but they haven't yet reached that "world standard"... They need at least another 10 years...
                Although, in electronics and the same AI - yes, there is no dispute, the Chinese are ahead of the rest of the world
                1. 0
                  8 July 2026 19: 07
                  Quote: futurohunter
                  Look at which countries are buying it...

                  Pakistan buys it and successfully uses it to hit Pakistani and Soviet-made aircraft.
                  Quote: futurohunter
                  Although, in electronics and the same AI - yes, there is no dispute, the Chinese are ahead of the rest of the world

                  Incidentally, the Chinese underestimate AI and spend disgracefully little on its development and production. But they spend it very effectively.
                  1. 0
                    9 July 2026 12: 38
                    Besides Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Myanmar, Iran, and Zimbabwe have also purchased Chinese aircraft. What are their airborne achievements?
                    successfully hits with it
                    Not particularly successful. The score with India is 1-1...
                    Pakistan buys it and successfully hits Pakistani aircraft with it.
                    That's what you said well. laughing They are good at this )))
                    By the way, the Chinese underestimate AI.
                    Well, yes, well... Especially deepsik and quen... Go to China and see how they underestimate.
                    they spend disgracefully little money
                    Unlike the Americans, the Chinese don't turn AI into a scam or a financial pyramid for the entire world... They use it exclusively for practical purposes.
                    1. 0
                      9 July 2026 14: 36
                      Quote: futurohunter
                      Unlike the Americans, the Chinese are not turning AI into a scam and a financial pyramid for the entire world.

                      The US, following China's lead, has begun selling only stripped-down versions of its AI to foreigners. If I were China's leader, I would sharply reduce aid to the Chinese auto industry and redirect the freed-up funds toward AI development.
                      Quote: futurohunter
                      Azerbaijan, Myanmar, Iran and Zimbabwe.

                      Iran successfully repelled Israel, far more successfully than the Arab coalition with Soviet weapons in all the Arab-Israeli wars. Azerbaijan recaptured Nagorno-Karabakh. The West accuses Myanmar and Zimbabwe of human rights violations, but they are in no rush to stage Orange Revolutions and invasions.
                      Quote: futurohunter
                      The score with India is 1:1...

                      India initiated the conflict by choosing the timing and degree of escalation. But despite a tenfold superiority in military budget and economy, it achieved nothing. It lost more modern Rafale fighters in a single sortie than the Ukrainian Armed Forces lose F-16s and Grippens in a month of war in Ukraine, or 8-10% of what India is prepared to purchase in a year. A day of war against Chinese aircraft costs India billions of dollars in weapons losses. Moreover, the Chinese themselves estimate their air force as capable of defeating the Taiwanese Air Force only in a one-on-one fight, and nothing more.
                      1. 0
                        10 July 2026 09: 40
                        Following China, the US has begun selling only stripped-down versions of its AI to foreigners.
                        Chinese DeepSeek and QWEN entered the market three years after the American ChatGPT and Clode. The Americans initially offered limited functionality in their free versions. Want a more "recent" model? Pay up! And they're all hallucinating, after all. Look, according to Clode, the Americans weren't targeting real planes, but rather those painted on airfields. Don't argue with me about neural networks—I've been working with them for a long time and I'm pretty fed up with this crap.
                        If I were in the place of the PRC leadership, I would
                        Well, they're not fools! Investing in material production creates real value, unlike investing in "air."
                        Iran successfully fought off Israel
                        Well, yes, at the cost of great destruction, the loss of virtually the entire fleet and almost the entire air force. Yes, Iran "became great again," but at what a price! They could have prepared and built a competent air defense system, and ours told them so! By the way, those Chinese aircraft of yours in Iran didn't prove themselves in any way in the recent wars. Chinese electronics, on Iranian drones and missiles – yes, they proved themselves, but Chinese weapons didn't.
                        much more successful than the Arab coalition
                        Too much finger-pointing, and too little action. But you're not quite right. During the Six-Day War, Arab air forces carried out a surprise attack that wiped out almost all Israeli aircraft. Israel even urgently requested aircraft from the US...
                        Azerbaijan recaptured
                        Well, yes, with the help of the Turkish army. And again, Chinese aircraft didn't make any appearance here...
                        The West is in no hurry to organize orange revolutions in Myanmar and Zimbabwe.
                        This is the same "elusive Joe" that no one gives a damn about yet... And what do Chinese planes have to do with it?
                        India started first
                        Well, they have a long history, essentially constant war since independence. It's like North and South Korea. Pakistan is essentially the same as India, with the same mentality among the population. Only the state religion is different, everything else is similar. Even the problems are the same. And here, in fact, "who started it" has long been forgotten.
                        But despite having a 10-fold advantage... she achieved nothing.
                        You can't take a brief exchange of missiles at long range, or even the occasional missile attacks on each other's territory, seriously. They fired a few shots and then went their separate ways. Letting off some steam, as they always do. They're real tough guys! Watch the border-closing ritual between India and Pakistan, which happens almost every day—it'll all become clear.
                        The loss of Rafale aircraft exceeds the loss of F-16s and Grippens in the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
                        Listen, do these F-16s even fly? Or are they just proudly shown off to journalists? I haven't heard anything about the Grippens...
                        By the way, they didn't seem to have lost any Sukhois; on the contrary, they shot down some Pakistanis...
                        A day of war against Chinese aircraft costs India... billions of dollars.
                        The Pakistanis suffered no less. And it's not a matter of whether the technology is good or bad, but the skill of the people using it.
                        Regarding China and Taiwan. The Americans have heavily armed Taiwan. Although these weapons are quite outdated. But the Chinese don't have everything up to date either. Their combat equipment hasn't caught up with Russian and American aircraft. Their aircraft are mostly outdated descendants of Soviet aircraft. The Chinese version of the Tu-16 is still in service. More "modern" aircraft are also not quite "modern" anymore. The JF-17/FC-1 is a direct descendant of the MiG-21, a rather mediocre aircraft. The J-10 is also not new - a development of the LAVI, an Israeli development based on the F-16. Chinese fifth generation? The J-20 design was seriously flawed, which is why the aircraft has irreparable flaws. The FC-31/J-35 are presented as analogues of the F-35. Imagine a downgraded F-35, which is already no picnic...
                        Of course, the Chinese are developing... But they won't reach the level of the USSR or the USA for at least 10 years... Although, they can take it in numbers...
                      2. -1
                        10 July 2026 13: 56
                        Quote: futurohunter
                        But they will not reach the level of the USSR or the USA for at least 10 years...

                        I gave you an assessment by Chinese military-industrial engineers from about five years ago that the PLA Air Force can now fight on equal terms with the Taiwanese Air Force. I didn't convince you that China is equal to the United States in aviation. The conversation turned to Hu Jintao's place in Chinese history. His achievements include laying the foundations of Chinese aircraft manufacturing, stimulating the growth of China's air power, and laying the foundations for victory over separatism in Xinjiang and Tibet.
                        Quote: futurohunter
                        But they will not reach the level of the USSR or the USA for at least 10 years...

                        The Chinese have reached the level of modern Russia. They are unlikely to reach the level of Israel and the United States even in 10 years.
                      3. 0
                        10 July 2026 16: 59
                        That the PLA Air Force can now fight on equal terms with the Taiwanese Air Force
                        Tiny Taiwan's military has always been inferior to that of the vast mainland of China. If not for the American occupation, Taiwan might have long since ceased to exist. Currently, Taiwan's military is vastly inferior to China's in both quantity and quality. I've already written that Taiwan's equipment is outdated, while China is already producing more modern technology. And quantitatively, China far outstrips Taiwan. Moreover, China has its own powerful military industry, something Taiwan lacks. With great difficulty, Taiwan managed to develop and produce only 50 mediocre Jin-Guo fighters. If China were to invade now, Taiwan would be able to resist for a maximum of 2-3 days... And its territory is limited...
                        China is equal to the US in aviation
                        Russia is also very far behind...
                        The conversation turned to Hu Jintao's place.
                        Past achievements don't always justify a person's position and status in the present... American and European companies didn't just come to China for no reason - someone invited them there... Wasn't it him?
                        The Chinese have reached the level of modern Russia
                        Quantitatively, perhaps, they have achieved this. Qualitatively, no. Chinese Su-27 clones and their own developments, like the J-15/16, are inferior in every way to their Russian counterparts. The Chinese still haven't been able to develop a combat aircraft comparable to the most modern Russian or American ones. They still haven't developed their own aircraft engine—they buy ours or produce them under license. They're ahead of the rest of the world only in electronics and AI...
                        The level of Israel and the US is unlikely to be reached
                        A strange statement... And what level is Israel's? Basically, everything is imported. Tanks? They're a homegrown design, but based on the ancient British Centurion. The electronics are half American. The aircraft are American, or licensed. They were once world leaders in drones, but they've long since lost that lead—the Chinese have long since surpassed them...
                        The US level... Tell me, what modern US aircraft, tanks, or warships have you heard of? The F-35 is still considered a failure and suffers from teething problems. An extremely weak aircraft. That's why the Americans aren't abandoning the old F-15/16/18 and even the A-10. The B-21? A smaller and simplified B-2. Where is that? Where do the Americans have anything even close to the Su-35S or Su-57? Tanks? They're still torturing the monstrous Abrams, making it even more monstrous. Ships? Project Zumwalt failed miserably. The Americans, yes, are ahead of the planet in all things telecom, data transmission and processing. And also in financial machinations and political intrigue. By the way, evil tongues say the AI ​​bubble will soon burst, and in such a way that no one will be able to resist...
        2. +1
          7 July 2026 15: 28
          Quote: futurohunter
          just to push Rubio out of the position of Trump's successor.

          Rubio is the descendant of the parasites Che and Fidel drove from the Island of Freedom. His election as US president will transform the world's leading economy into a run-of-the-mill Latin American dictatorship, with favelas for the workers and ostentatious luxury for gangsters, speculators, and their security detail.
          1. 0
            7 July 2026 19: 43
            But now, isn’t that so?
            Rubio is quite an American, although he is offended that his ancestors were once “infringed” by Fidel and his comrades.
            1. 0
              7 July 2026 23: 10
              Quote: futurohunter
              But now, isn’t that so?

              The United States is at a crossroads. The Democratic Party has a strong socialist faction. It's unlikely that US voters will allow those gathered around Rubio to remake the United States in the image of Batista's Cuba, Peronist Argentina, or Pinochet's Chile. Moreover, in the second half of the 20th century, the world saw that the oligarchic dictatorships of Salazar, Franco, and Pinochet led to stagnation and a loss of momentum. Vance and Rubio are antagonists. The difference between them is greater than that between Putin and Zelensky.
              1. 0
                8 July 2026 10: 21
                The Democratic Party has a strong socialist faction
                No more "socialist" than a drunken old man on a bench near his house, waving an old party card.
                It's unlikely that US voters will allow it
                Ordinary Americans couldn't care less about your Cubas, Venezuelas, and Irans. But they really care about the rising gas prices at the nearest gas station, or the brazen gang of Latino drug addicts. They'll vote for the one who promises to solve THEIR PERSONAL problems.
                The world saw that the oligarchic dictatorship of Salazar, Franco, and Pinochet was leading to stagnation
                Where does it lead? Under Salazar, Portugal lived relatively calmly and without upheaval. It was out of sight and sound. And after Salazar, has anything changed? When was the last time you heard about Portugal?
                Franco
                Franco, oddly enough, stopped the bloody orgy in his own country (it wasn't just Franco's supporters who shed blood, but also the "democrats," who knows who more). Incidentally, Franco imprisoned or executed the real fascists. Yes, he blundered by sending the "Blue Division" to us, but he came to his senses in time. And he didn't get drawn into WWII. But his country served as a good base for intelligence from all the warring countries, including the USSR. Incidentally, this same Franco raised King Juan Carlos and bequeathed to him the task of restoring democracy in Spain. What a paradoxical ruler he was. And despite everything, after WWII, the USSR restored diplomatic relations with Franco's Spain and traded successfully with it. Incidentally, under Franco, Spain didn't join NATO. But after becoming democratic, it immediately joined.
                Pinochet is undoubtedly a scoundrel and a bloody fascist, but Salvador Allende was no better, and like Yanukovych in Ukraine, he brought the situation to a coup. Therefore, oddly enough, many people in Chile still respect him...
                Vance and Rubio are antagonists
                Only in the struggle for power. Both are graduates of the American political school, and, in essence, are identical.
                1. 0
                  20 July 2026 06: 17
                  Quote: futurohunter
                  The Democratic Party has a strong socialist faction. No more "socialist" than a drunken old man on a bench near his house, waving an old party card.

                  There's an online interview with US Vice President D-Vance about the threat of a communist revolution in the US and how the policies of the US Democratic Party and the activities of certain monopolies are fueling sympathy for communism in the US. Of the three hours of the interview, D-Vance devotes more than half an hour to this issue, not counting the events in Ukraine, which affect US interests in the context of the communist threat due to Democratic policies. Furthermore, Vance goes further and declares that the entire thirty-year activity of both Democrats and Republicans has, in many ways, created a real threat of communists coming to power in the US. Sometimes it's useful to watch or read foreign politicians in the original. Incidentally, D-Vance's analysis of Putin shows that Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is also actively preparing the ground for a communist comeback.
                  1. 0
                    20 July 2026 10: 21
                    Forgive me, Vladimir, but what kind of illusory world are you living in? Don't you understand that politicians in the US are ready to accuse their competitors of anything? Why the hell would communists be there? Even in the best of times, the Communist Party of the USA, even with the support of the USSR, eked out a miserable existence. And the US Secretary of State managed to successfully cultivate friendships with the American intelligence agencies, which is why they tolerated him. The US is such a capitalist country and such a private enterprise that communism simply cannot exist there.
                    Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is actively preparing the ground for a communist revanche.
                    Our President stated that "the destruction of the USSR was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe".
                    But don't get confused respect to the destruction of its country с attitude towards ideology and socio-political system.
                    Putin called the Moral Code of the Builder of Communism "a primitive excerpt from the Bible" (https://tass.ru/obschestvo/4872596)
                    In 1991, Putin said: "The truth is becoming increasingly clear to me that this is all a beautiful and harmful fairy tale. Harmful because its implementation, the attempt to implement it in our country, has caused enormous damage to it…","…It was precisely the activists of October 17 who laid a time bomb", "... The only thing they did to keep the country within common borders was barbed wire. As soon as that barbed wire was removed, the country fell apart. I think it's largely these people's fault...».
                    In 2024, he stated,Faith in communism was lost, but not by everyone... And this, in my opinion, should also be treated with respect." (https://ria.ru/20240607/putin-1951493731.html). This is simply a statement that the President respects the communists as a political force.
                    Vladimir Putin still holds liberal ideas close to his heart, but he is against having them imposed on the people, presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov stated at a briefing (https://www.interfax.ru/world/667063).
                    "The restoration of socialism in Russia is impossible; elements of socialization of the economy and social sphere are possible"Russian President Vladimir Putin stated at his annual press conference (https://ria.ru/20181220/1548320691.html).
                    Obviously, the President, who spent many years in the military and intelligence services of the USSR, was a member of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and received a "specialized education" in the USSR, was bound to have an excellent understanding of scientific communism. He also spent many years interacting with Western politicians and businessmen, and later worked on a team of reformers. Therefore, he is also well acquainted with capitalist economics.
                    As far as I understand, the President favors a model similar to the Chinese one. That is, capitalism, with the most important enterprises and industries under state control. The state also has a highly developed social system, but its operators are private companies (pension funds, insurance companies, etc.). Basically, it's catholicism tied to the state, plus some concern for citizens. This model has been under construction for many years, the President supports it, and no other options are in sight. I'm not debating whether this is good or bad; I'm saying that in Russia, at the moment, there are no plans to revive socialism or implement communist ideas. What's being built is a "regulated and managed" capitalism.
                    Don't live in illusions.
                    1. +1
                      20 July 2026 10: 43
                      Quote: futurohunter
                      Excuse me, Vladimir, but what illusory world do you live in?

                      My parents simply bought me a history textbook for school when I finished first grade, and a university textbook on Ancient Greek and Modern History when I finished third or fourth. I like US history and follow events in this country. You may call me a fool and a loser in US history. But you should be careful about D. Vance. If he spends half an hour convincing his fellow citizens of the communist danger, he apparently thinks more than half the voters will believe him and he will become the next US president. Incidentally, some historians consider Stolypin to be the politician who brought about the overthrow of the Tsar and the rise to power of Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin. According to D. Vance's logic, Putin and his entourage, with their straightforward, stupid, and pathetically anti-communism in the spirit of Stolypin, are reincarnating in Russia the rise to power of someone similar to Stalin and Trotsky.
                      1. -1
                        20 July 2026 11: 55
                        Sorry, I don't know how old you are. But history and politics aren't learned from school textbooks; they're learned by taking a personal interest, delving into the subject, reading serious, comprehensive books by various authors, and, most importantly, thinking, thinking, thinking.
                        Politics is a somewhat more complex matter than you've described. You apparently haven't noticed that Trump recently spoke out about the dangers of communism. Vance is a Trump ally and is in the same party as him. And it's perfectly normal in the US for political opponents to accuse each other of something. Communism hasn't been accused yet—that's a new one. More precisely, the communist bogeyman swept the US in the 50s and 60s, during the Cold War, when a "Kremlin agent" lurked around every corner. Vance hadn't yet been born, and Trump was still young.
                        Stolypin is considered
                        This is an overly simplistic and incorrect explanation, an attempt to find someone to blame. In fact, the royal family, headed by the Tsar, was primarily to blame. It was they who preserved Russia in the Middle Ages, preventing even capitalism from properly developing. Therefore, the Tsar was unsuitable for any political force, and it wasn't the Communists who overthrew him, but his entourage.
                        Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin
                        These are completely different figures, with completely different policies. Lenin was a brilliant diplomat and an excellent organizer, able to bring together various political forces, sometimes even opposing ones, and steer them in the right direction. His greatest achievement was establishing a new government in time and preventing the country from disintegrating completely. Trotsky was a strong leader, a powerful organizer, whose efforts were largely responsible for the October Revolution and the victory in the Civil War. But at the same time, they fancied themselves Napoleons. Trotsky was also a protégé of foreign powers who, through him, wanted to cause a "world conflagration," a general civil war. And he had no interest in Russia at all; his ambitions went much further.
                        Stalin is a restorer of the state, a bureaucrat, a leisurely and thoughtful strategist and organizer, who managed to raise the country from nothing to one of the greatest powers in the world, stop the Civil War and prevent a bloody dictatorship.
                        Stalin and Trotsky cannot be compared at all. Trotsky is a destroyer, Stalin a builder and creator. We are still using what Stalin built. Can you say the same about Trotsky?
                        According to Di Vance's Logic
                        All this “logic” is purely a tool of Vance’s political struggle for the future position of president.
                        Putin and his entourage with their straightforward, stupid to the point of pathetic anti-communism
                        These are fabrications of the President's enemies. Rather, Vladimir Vladimirovich skillfully ensures stability and civil peace in society, eliminating the most dangerous enemies of the state and ensuring the loyalty of the rest. I don't consider him an anti-communist or a liberal, but rather a sober pragmatist who takes the political situation into account and makes the moves he needs. He's a very skilled chess player, though he's made some mistakes. And who doesn't make mistakes? Who just sits on the couch and does nothing?
                      2. 0
                        20 July 2026 17: 59
                        Quote: futurohunter
                        I don’t consider him either an anti-communist or a liberal, but rather a sober pragmatist who takes into account the political situation and makes the moves he needs.

                        Putin is a staunch anti-communist. At one time, he dreamed of banning the Communist Party of Ukraine (CPSU) in the post-Maidan era, apparently much earlier than the Ukrainians. He was stopped by an analysis of the situation in the country prepared for him by Russian statisticians, which concluded that overt, violent anti-communism would provoke a civil war in Russia similar to what happened in Ukraine or Syria. Nevertheless, in his attempts to conduct an effective anti-communist campaign, Putin often finances openly anti-state and anti-Russian individuals. This was the case with Yakovenko, who entrusted the cultivation of Nashi to neo-Banderites. This was the case with Chulpan Khamatova, who starred in a film that debased Russian and Tatar history and, after the start of the SVO, fled to the West to squander the money Putin gave her for her Russophobic role in the odious film. Compare Dee Vance's anti-communist speech with any anti-communist propaganda project of Putin's propagandists. In an interview on July 16, Dee Vance sensibly illustrated the contemporary dangers of a leftward shift without descending into the Russophobia that Putin's ideologists almost always resort to when attempting to denigrate or expose the Soviet communist past.
                      3. 0
                        20 July 2026 18: 41
                        Let's take a sober look. Who destroyed the USSR, and who became the first anti-communist in our country? The most quintessential communist leaders. Those "now at the helm," did they start out back in the USSR, when they were simply young? Why should they change? Moreover, the foundations of modern capitalism in our country were laid back in the USSR; 1991 merely saw its legalization, at which point underground communist profiteers gained the full right to call themselves respected businessmen.
                        Moreover, Anpilov's real Communist Party was disbanded. Everything that emerged in its place were either opportunist parties that in fact supported capitalism, such as the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. How could the richest people be members of a Communist Party? Or, masquerading as communists, they were outright buffoons and clowns, like Limonov, who alienated any sane person from the communist idea.
                        And, in fact, we don't have any communists right now. There's only a marketplace of inter-party struggle between capitalist parties for the best positions. The idea itself hasn't been discredited; it's just that right now, communism is only pursued by isolated theorists who have no political clout and are not involved in any practical activities. Therefore, all this talk of anti-communism in Russia is pointless. And "left" and "right" have long been confused, and no one can tell them apart anymore. And the far left and the far right are basically the same thing.
                      4. 0
                        20 July 2026 20: 48
                        Quote: futurohunter
                        Everything that has emerged to replace the CPSU is either opportunistic parties that, in fact, support capitalism, such as the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

                        I would prefer Russia to develop along a democratic capitalist path rather than a capitalist one. Putin as a politician is more acceptable to me than any of his competitors, from Zyuganov to Nemtsov. And I'm talking about practically the entire spectrum. But some aspects of current politics not only alarm me, but also frighten me. Nabiullina managed to reduce computer sales in Russia by 20%, and this allows me to conclude that all complex design work independent of the state and large monopolies in the Russian Federation has ceased.
                        Quote: futurohunter
                        And "left" and "right" have long been confused and no one can tell them apart anymore.

                        They had already become entangled under Trotsky and Stalin. Vance simply showed that the US and Russia face similar problems. Both countries are sliding toward oligarchy, a lack of national unity within the state, and apparently inevitable major cataclysms if the rich continue to oppress their less fortunate fellow citizens with the same intensity.
                      5. 0
                        Yesterday, 16: 50
                        democratic capitalist path and not capitalist
                        What's the difference? Capitalism is capitalism in Africa, even in South America. laughing

                        competitors from Zyuganov to Nemtsov
                        Genzyug isn't even a competitor, but a comrade and brother—Putin always congratulates him on his birthday... And Genzyug is a bit old—he retired... And the "German" just kept spreading his fingers and looking for someone to sell out to. So he sold out... as a "sacred sacrifice"...

                        Nabiullina managed to reduce computer sales
                        She not only, and not so much, reduced them...

                        all complex ones have been stopped
                        And all you need for this is computers? Machines and technology aren't needed, right? There are already a ton of computers... Every house has five or more...

                        under Trotsky and Stalin
                        You stubbornly confuse the destroyer and the builder. You don't eat poison for dinner, do you? You eat food?

                        Vance just showed
                        that he wants to become Trump's successor.

                        The US and Russia face similar problems
                        Where are they similar? No more than two "m"s in the word "problems," as you wrote. What similar problems do a global intriguer and aggressor have, and a global helper and benefactor?

                        are rolling into oligarchy
                        "Oligarchism," or more accurately, large-monopoly capitalism, is the foundation of the US economy, and has been so since its inception. And in Russia, prominent communists and Komsomol members wanted to become oligarchs—and they did. am
                        Once again: don't be so naive... Become a cynic and you will be happy. laughing
  33. +2
    7 July 2026 05: 29
    And when did it start?
    When millions of idiots shouted "Yeltsin, Yeltsin" at thousands of rallies and thus gave birth to democracy, the consequences of which we are all now suffering!
    So we have ourselves to blame!
    And the insolent and fattened “new masters” will inevitably run around the world again and look at the “ungrateful people”
    Like what years ago...
  34. +2
    7 July 2026 06: 39
    Staver is recognizable. Literally from the very first lines. A rhetorical question for the author. And the announcement of senseless and incomprehensible ceasefires, the failure to strike the enemy where they should have been at the very beginning of the SVO, the order given to our military to retreat from the enemy capital and two other regions—isn't that also treason? Just on a higher level. But thanks to these very actions by our leadership, the SVO continues to this day, with enemy drones flying over our cities. And our younger generation has plenty of room to prove themselves.
    So what's the punishment for the actions I described above? Being re-elected to the same position for another term?
  35. +3
    7 July 2026 07: 52
    The situation today is reminiscent of a village paramedic who, when a patient cut his finger, said, "It's nothing special, it'll pass and be forgotten." But when gangrene developed, he said, "We have no other choice, we have to amputate it, even without anesthesia." Anti-Russian hysteria began to boil over in the 90s, when the oppression and persecution of Russian-speakers began in Ukraine. Schools were closed, people were dismissed from office, and explicit threats were made: "Hang the Muscovite," "The best Muscovite is a dead Muscovite," "Muscovites, get your suitcase, go to the station." In the 90s and 95s alone, 12 million people left the country. And they asked for help and protection, but Russia remained silent. Our officials and politicians were busy dividing up the national wealth. Most of them, themselves or their children, have long since left their homes abroad. A story of betrayal and punishment. It's not like setting fire to a closet, but rather allowing the situation to become gangrenous. The consequences will last for years to come. But there are no culprits.
    1. +3
      7 July 2026 09: 46
      There are those responsible!!! And we know many of them by name. But no one has touched them, and no one will. Chubais is the most striking example. All our steam has been and will continue to be lost. You can't beat a whip with a club. Such are the realities of today.
  36. +3
    7 July 2026 11: 01
    I wonder what the high-ranking army officials are like, the ones who are greedy for bribes? Are they traitors? Or just stumbling? Governors and other scum.
  37. +2
    7 July 2026 14: 10
    The pathos of "Commissioner Staver" is understandable... But... Hasn't our television and movie screens been promoting for years that "The most important things in life are money and 'success'"? And this propaganda hasn't gone away! They still show shows about the rich and the poor, ready to tear each other's throats out over an apartment or an inheritance. What kind of patriotism are you talking about after that?
    Regarding "Ukrainian heroes." Any ideology is impossible without "heroes." The German Nazis had them, too. The Ziono-Ukrainian Nazi elite are merely their diligent disciples...
    Regarding Ukrainians... Political scientist Semyon Uralov, who himself came "from there," wrote very well about them. All this disgrace became possible because the majority of Ukrainians adopted the attitude of "it's none of my business." "As long as they leave me alone." This attitude hasn't gone away. The majority of Ukrainians don't want to die on the front lines. But they won't rebel against their government either. Most of all, they want "everyone to leave them alone." A Kyiv taxi driver, back in 2008, when asked, "What did he think of the Russian-Georgian war?", replied that "he doesn't care about any politics, but is more interested in 'how our guys played football.'" Yes, the majority of people don't want to get involved in any political games, but are preoccupied with their own everyday problems, especially when prices are rising, infrastructure is in a deplorable state, etc. And they still don't understand what's going on. Especially if a relative was arrested and killed at the front. And they were happily told "who killed him." I'm not excusing the Ukrainians. I'm simply reminding you of the highly developed and cultured people of Germany in the 30s, who in a matter of years were transformed into convinced Nazis.
    Uralov, by the way, warns that the Russian population is also afflicted by the same "hut-squatter" mentality. And the West wouldn't mind spinning a "Ukrainian scenario" here, too. And how many cries are there now against the authorities amid the "fuel crisis"? Recently, the program "Time of Heroes" featured an interview with a director whose son went to the North Military District, and she, following him, went to the front to make films about what was happening. She recounted a visit to a university. How she was greeted by a professor wearing a blue and yellow tie. And how the students initially treated her. And how do all these people chasing the latest iPhones feel about what's happening?
    Regarding the so-called "our" traitors. Alexander Dugin called them the "sixth column." Those same ones who, in name, are "patriots," but in reality, hinder vital initiatives, own real estate and bank accounts abroad, and so on. But the majority of these people "rose" back in the 90s. And how did they "rise"? Almost all of them were former communists or Komsomol members. And by the end of the USSR, people joined the "party" and Komsomol only for career advancement and material benefits. And what do you expect from them and their children, who are also "well-off"? If the author were to suggest what to do with these people, and most importantly: WHO WILL DO ALL THIS?
    The author suggests "publicly judging" and "imprisoning." But WHO will do this?
    There's another awkward point... Anyone who grew up at the end of the last century remembers the question: "What neighborhood are you from, kid? Who do you know?" Unfortunately, Russians are disunited. While for an Azerbaijani, every Azerbaijani is a fellow countryman, for a Russian, only those they know are their own. Alas, "they don't abandon their own" only at the front, not in civilian life... None of us are surprised by everyday rudeness, impudence, and obscene language, which no longer shocks anyone on film or television. And popular stand-up comedians don't swear, they "speak obscenely"!
    There's only one hope left. That the country will cleanse itself over time. The idea of ​​globalism and the notion that "somewhere out there, everything's good" is gradually dying. And now these "youth with iPhones" are learning that drones are flying over Dubai skyscrapers. That floods and hurricanes happen in "paradisiacal corners of the world." That Russians aren't particularly welcome anywhere, and relocated people will never feel "at home" in other countries. That the best country is your own, no matter how much you criticize "all those officials."
    Hope still lives... Let's hope that our government keeps up with the times... That not only will our clinics become beautiful, but that good doctors will be hired there. That not only Moscow, but even smaller towns will become beautiful...
  38. 0
    7 July 2026 15: 39
    The main betrayal lies within the elite. They are the ones who should be the driving force in the country, and they are the ones who have either withdrawn or are directly betraying in various forms. Unlike in the West, where the elite is united, bold, and daring, as befits a capitalist who will strangle anyone for a penny.
    1. P
      +3
      7 July 2026 18: 49
      They are not traitors. They are ordinary enemies. To betray, you have to become one of them, even for a second.
  39. -5
    7 July 2026 15: 44
    Betrayal is the result of a communist upbringing, not a capitalist one. Let's recall history: the German government hired Blanc to defeat Russia in World War I. The American government hired the foremen of perestroika to destroy the USSR. The Soviet secret services did nothing to save the country, for the sake of their own wealth. How many more times will we step on the same rake? Make everyone poor so they won't betray? But the people never betrayed before. It was the elite who betrayed—if you can call a gang of international terrorists that—the Leninist guard, purged by Dzhugashvili. Maybe it's time to stop pushing the people down a dead end. Start caring about the middle class, the wealthy farmer, the industrialist. They are the foundation of the state, not a herd of the dispossessed under communist leaders.
  40. -1
    7 July 2026 17: 47
    It is difficult and counterproductive to talk about "betrayal" in a country that, independently and with universal "support," has betrayed the conquests of its heroic ancestors, the conquests of socialism.
  41. P
    +2
    7 July 2026 18: 48
    Capitalists in both the USSR and Russia equally slander the heroism of their ancestors and their great history. Just look at Ilyin and the Mannerheim plaque. And, tellingly, none of the ruling thugs got a slap in the face for these antics.
  42. 0
    7 July 2026 21: 56
    To, co napisze, nie dotyczy obecnej sytuacji i Rosji. Raczej Polski.
    Gdy mowa o zdradzie kraju, dobrze jest spytać też, na ile ten kraj jest lub nie jest godny bycia mu wiernym.
    Czy wierność 3. Rzeszy byłaby etyczna?
    Po drugie myślę, że każdy z nas nie tylko może, ale musi dokonać takiej oceny. Wziąć pod uwagę całość kraju i całość swoich z nim relacji.
    Czy Polska dzisiejsza jest godna wierności jej?
    Kraj neoliberalnego wstrząśnienia mózgu, rusofobicznej histerii, podle traktujący swoich obywateli, kraj cenzury, propagandy i aresztów wydobywczych, kraj bez sprawiedliwości i bez poczucia czystej gry, państwo upadające i niszczące swoich mieszkańców, zukrainizowane i kryminalizujsce się, skorumpowane, nędzne i głupie.
    Cóż.
    Rzeczywiście best to problem.
    Moralność to dyspozycja, która wynika z wewnątrz człowieka. Tylko wewnatrzsterowni mogą być moralni. Inni są tylko naśladowcami.
    Trzeba mieć odwagę, aby stanąć przeciw tłumowi, gdy racja moralna jest po mojej stronie.
    I oprzeć się terrorowi patriotyzmu.
    On jest bardzo często bronią nikczemnych ludzi.
    Zdrada to jednak coś, co potrzebuje dwu uczestników. Ona sama w sobie jest tylko możliwością. Inaczej:
    Nie trzeba zdradzać, gdy sytuacja nie wymaga określenia się, gdyż jest ostateczna.
    Można po prostu być. I trzymać się drogi sprzeciwu czy wewnętrznej emigracji, niekoniecznie zdradzając, o ile ma się w ogóle jakieś informacje.
    Można też, i to kwestia rewolucji, zdradzić władze, nie kraj. Nie jest to nawet zdrada, to bunt.
    Subsumuje:
    Jesteśmy jako ludzie zmuszeni do ocen etycznych. Powinniśmy je dokonywać uczciwie. Z nich zaś wynika, czy możemy być wierni temu lub innemu podmiotowi.
    Jednak ta niewierność może się różnie wyrażać. W sytuacji odręcznej, zagrożenia własnego życia, nasz wybór nigdy nie będzie wolny, czyli uczciwy. To zaś wskazuje, iż wtedy o zdradzie nie ma mowy.
    Najlepiej się zbuntować, stanąć do walki, lecz to nie takie proste.
    Kiedy więc dochodzi do momentu wyboru, powinniśmy mieć jasność, co możemy lub musimy wybrać, aby zadośćuczynić etyce.
    Wszystko to proste może, ale jakże skomplikowane.
    Sesja trwa, jakby powiedział słynny Ostap...
  43. -1
    7 July 2026 22: 03
    Just five years ago, who could have imagined that Ukraine would bomb Omsk? And not a word on the idiot box. Almost like the Brezhnev era.
  44. 0
    8 July 2026 11: 26
    Well, if we trumpet the sentences for these scumbags all over the media, that would be "rocking the boat"! And you can't rock the boat! You can't bother the average person with unnecessary information.
  45. 0
    8 July 2026 20: 12
    I am definitely including this article in my Favorites, thanks in part to the commentators.
    In order to then show people's opinions to those who could have, but couldn't.
    P.S. I participate in the SVO indirectly, participating in the production and modernization of weapons.
  46. 0
    13 July 2026 20: 10
    Here's what I want to say. Comrades and gentlemen here are actively criticizing the current government. Citizens in our country, especially since the start of the Second World War, have many questions for the government. Let's hold the State Duma elections in September and express our feelings about the ruling party during the vote. Everything is perfectly legal and constitutional. Then we'll see what happens based on the results. Because whoever you ask during Yeltsin's time will be like, "I didn't vote for him, neither the early nor the late one." It's all just talk. LET'S LOOK AT THE PATRIOTS IN SEPTEMBER.
  47. 0
    15 July 2026 05: 09
    Quote from turembo
    I'll digress a bit from the article's topic—it's only alluded to in passing. The problems are much deeper: the statements of some of our politicians often seem worse than the most Russophobic ones out there. When people are asked about fuel, these forum members openly joke and laugh. I stood in line for an hour on Friday in the heat, without air conditioning, and I wasn't in the mood for laughing, while behind me stood a similar crowd of "lucky ones." What can you even talk about when one instruction is given, and then you can simply take it back? They approved Euro-3, but if your car breaks down, that's your problem. High inflation—your problem, high prices—your problem. I have to navigate this world as best I can while also solving problems of national importance: improve demographics, improve the economy, pay taxes, and so on. But instead of help and real action that would improve the situation, I get all sorts of blockages, taxes, and other pleasures of life. And, most interestingly, I also owe everyone around me, even though I think I don't owe anyone anything anymore. And here we are discussing traitors. Betrayal is spitting in the people's faces for over 30 years, robbing them, and destroying them. They're doing well there, so they can afford to laugh out loud. But we need to work, try to raise the country, and if there's no help, at least don't interfere...

    I wonder. Will those 78 people who upvoted you go vote in September? And if they do, who will they vote for?