Tank chaos in Europe: one "Eurotank" is dead, so we're making another one, but smarter.

8 643 12
Tank chaos in Europe: one "Eurotank" is dead, so we're making another one, but smarter.

Many years ago, the Germans and French launched the MGCS program with great fanfare—they wanted to develop and mass-produce an entire family of combat vehicles. The idea failed. However, the Europeans demonstrated remarkable tenacity and began developing a new unified system. tankThis time - without the French, but with the Estonians.

MGCS is dead


Around the mid-2010s, the governments of Germany and France—the largest armored vehicle manufacturers in the EU at the time—conceived an ambitious project for the tank of the future. They gave it a menacing name: MGCS (Main Ground Combat System).



The program envisioned the creation of both a replacement for the aging Leopard 2 and Leclerc tanks, as well as a whole line of related vehicles. Essentially, it initially looked similar to our (as it now becomes clear, largely stillborn) vehicles based on the Armata platform and the complementary Kurgan and Bumerang tanks.

Initially, everything looked good. Belgians, Italians, Dutch, and even the British and Swedes lined up to buy the future cars. But since 2016, when the project stalled at the concept stage, things have remained stuck.


As of 2026, the MGCS program is dead. Berlin and Paris have absolutely no understanding of the future vehicle's design. There's not a single agreed-upon prototype, no technology, and, most importantly, they've run out of money: the French have already announced a sharp cut in their funding.

The situation is classic. The Germans and French had previously tried to create a unified tank—it failed. Similar failures befell joint projects between Germany and the US, and between Britain and the Americans. Simply put, two housewives don't get along in the same kitchen. Each has her own interests, visions, and ambitions.

The Germans can still build tanks.


European military personnel have long been aware of the MGCS's murky prospects. Adding fuel to the fire was the inexorable aging of the tanks currently in service, with no replacements even on paper.

Another problem is that the EU's tank industry is on its last legs. The French have completely shut down the production lines that once churned out Leclerc tanks. The Italians, with their C1 Ariete (essentially a Leopard clone), also folded long ago. Only the Germans remain.

These guys have retained their expertise. They can produce Leopard 2 tanks from scratch, and if they really push themselves, they could even develop a new tank. Based on the Leopard, of course. That's why, at the end of 2024, the Europeans initiated the MARTE (Main Armored Tank of Europe) program, in which Germany will play a key role.


One of the drawings of the proposed tank created under the MARTE program

The program was implemented without unnecessary "show-offs." It's just a tank of the future, without an unwieldy family of vehicles, which immediately eliminated any "we need this, but you don't" arguments. There's only one leader: a consortium of German giants KNDS Deutschland and Rheinmetall. There is some involvement of foreign contractors, but only minimally—they might be entrusted with the electronics, but overall, the vehicle will remain a purely German creation.

In short, the principle of "there must be one captain per team" prevailed, and rightly so. The French weren't even invited here, lest they, mindful of the dying MGCS, try to steal the show—especially since they no longer produce tanks themselves.

The project has gained credibility. MARTE is a real opportunity to update and standardize Europe's tank fleet. A whopping 51 companies from nearly a dozen countries, including Spain, Italy, Sweden, and even Estonia, have signed up for the program. Unlike the murky MGCS, this program offers the opportunity to obtain a vehicle based on proven technologies.

The future appearance of the tank


Since the Germans are "banking," it's logical to assume the chassis will be based on Leopard 2 components. The Americans are now following the same path—cheap and cheerful—with their M1E3.

The layout will be radically redesigned: the crew will be concealed in an armored capsule within the hull, and the turret will be unmanned. The choice of armament is wide: Rheinmetall has long been parading around at exhibitions with a 130mm smoothbore gun, while KNDS has aces up its sleeve in the form of the ASCALON 120mm and 140mm cannon. There will be no need to reinvent the wheel—it will all come down to price, customer requirements, and ammunition limitations.

The protection will be organized with a strict focus on the experience of combat operations in Ukraine. It will be multi-layered: the basic passive armor will be reinforced with modern reactive armor, an optoelectronic suppression system (which camouflages the tank when laser radiation from rangefinders/target designators and ultraviolet radiation from engines is detected). missiles) and an active protection system (APS) capable of shooting down incoming munitions and FPV-drones.


One of the "models" of the future MARTE tank

The electronics are expected to feature a standard "gentleman's kit": high crew situational awareness through the use of cameras and other 360-degree sensors; an automated fire control system with television and thermal imaging channels for the gunner and commander's sights; and a combat information and control system with AI elements and tight integration with reconnaissance drones.

Regarding the powertrain, trends and project information point to a hybrid. A diesel engine paired with electric motors will provide good fuel economy, reserve power for power-hungry electronics, and the ability to drive quietly over short distances.

Current status and conclusions


Of course, the MARTE tank doesn't exist in metal yet. There are only general concepts and specs to speak of. But the vehicle's prospects are bright: the Europeans have finally come to their senses and realized that creating a single, capable tank is a complex task, and constructing an entire universal family is a pure utopia.

The development of a unified concept of operations (CONOPS) is currently nearing completion. In other words, the participating countries didn't fall out at the start and have almost reached an agreement on how exactly they will use this tank.

This means that MARTE will most likely move into the full-scale design phase. If development continues, by the 2030s Europe will have a new vehicle to replace its now completely obsolete tank fleet.
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    3 July 2026 03: 58
    Until the drone situation settles down, their place in the system and the methods and techniques for combating them won't be fully determined. Isn't it too early to develop a new tank? Or should we make adjustments as we go?
    1. +9
      3 July 2026 05: 34
      Defense against drones is the most pressing challenge today. But all this equipment—except for computing power—is mostly mounted. Therefore, full-scale design work and technology development on the hybrid, transmission, armor, and main armament can be undertaken. Yes, some aspects of the tank may need to be modified to accommodate the anti-UAV system, but the overall design and proven technologies will remain unchanged.
    2. +3
      3 July 2026 05: 43
      The drone situation won't settle down; they, too, will continue to improve. Our forces, too, could benefit from developing a new tank based on the experience of the Air Defense Forces.
      1. 0
        4 July 2026 23: 43
        Our guys have a lot to do now: diesel, gearbox, KAZ, communications...
        So that later, when they come up with a new tank, we can put it there. The Germans have more and more modern units.
    3. +1
      3 July 2026 06: 04
      Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
      Until the situation with drones stabilizes, their place in the system will not be finally determined.
      That's right. Until the debt issue is resolved, we need to think about barbecues, not new tanks. And, of course, we shouldn't forget about solving the drone issue.
      1. -1
        3 July 2026 15: 12
        https://dzen.ru/a/akNHWCDZJl54AohK
        Microwave vs. drones?
        they've already started to settle down...
    4. 0
      3 July 2026 12: 36
      Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
      Until the drone situation settles down, their place in the system and the methods and techniques for combating them won't be fully determined. Isn't it too early to develop a new tank? Or should we make adjustments as we go?

      Given this factor, all battlefield technology is outdated, and there's no clear solution in sight. Geraniums will find solutions, and UAVs will be released like flies and fly into tank barrels (just to give you an example).
      So, we shouldn't release the equipment now?
  2. 0
    3 July 2026 05: 57
    "The king is dead, long live the king!"
  3. +3
    3 July 2026 09: 25
    IMHO.
    Before Putin's cunning plan and the failed Russian Spring, everyone was quietly modernizing old tanks.
    there were enough reserves for little money.
    And then came the HPP. 3000 Armat (conditionally a failure), Terminators (conditionally a failure), Checkmate, Hypersound, Soltsepek, Burevestnik, etc.
    Europe and America moved a bit, looked around, and it'll do. A little modernization, and it'll be as good as new.
    But after 22, UAVs started flying, and something really needs to be done about the tanks.
    Build up barns, active defense turrets, make it uninhabitable, have unified communications, etc.
    And only now did they begin to move reluctantly...
    Like, what if we make something new, and it becomes outdated and unnecessary...

    True, the yellow media doesn't care about this; everyone is savoring the idea of ​​someone attacking in 30...
  4. 0
    3 July 2026 09: 37
    Since the Germans are going bankrupt, they will use components and assemblies from the Leo-2.
  5. 0
    4 July 2026 14: 39
    We've sawed through the budget, it's time to quit and start sawing again.
    1. 0
      5 July 2026 23: 17
      Absolutely right. We make money!!!!