Why did Hitler refuse to land in England?

14 972 108
Why did Hitler refuse to land in England?
A German Messerschmitt Bf.109E-4B fighter-bomber in flight over the English Channel. 1940.


General situation


After the defeat of France, the "Hitlerite European Union" grew significantly stronger. The Nazis captured nine states: Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Denmark, Norway, Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, and the free city of Klaipėda (Memel). They controlled over 100 million people.



The Third Reich gained significant military and economic resources. In particular, the defeat of Czechoslovakia made it possible to arm nine divisions. The developed military-industrial complex of Bohemia now served the German Reich. Czech workers labored faithfully for the Nazis until the very end of the war.

France provided the Germans with even more resources. The trophies were colossal and allowed them to arm 30 to 40 divisions, hundreds of artillery units, tank, security, reserve, and garrison units. Thousands of French vehicles compensated for the critical equipment shortage in German formations.

Berlin was given the opportunity to form entire divisions from volunteers, collaborators, and local nationalists. Although the Führer was in no hurry to do so, believing he could quickly defeat the Russians. Hitler also refrained from turning Germany and all of Europe into a military camp or carrying out a total mobilization of industry and people, believing that the available forces and resources would be sufficient for a blitzkrieg in the East.Why did Germany start World War II?).

On July 31, 1940, at a meeting of the highest military leadership in Berlin, Hitler tasked the development of a plan to "destroy Russia's vital force." He scheduled the operation for the spring of 1941. The Führer returned to his old plans for "expanding Lebensraum in the East." As early as August 1940, the transfer of units from France to the East began.

Preparations for war with Russia were carried out in complete secrecy. Even their allies—Fascist Italy and the Japanese Empire—were not fully informed of their plans.


A flight of Messerschmitt Bf.109E fighters from the 26th Fighter Squadron "Schlageter" in flight over the English Channel. August 1940.


German Heinkel He-111 bombers take off from an airfield on the English Channel coast. Battle of Britain.

England's "peace proposal"


True, there was still Britain. Hitler believed that after the defeat of France, he would easily make peace with the British. He offered Britain easy terms: London would retain its colonial empire, the most powerful fleet in Europe, that is, control over sea communications. And the British had to recognize the German conquests in Europe.

In the summer of 1940, Britain's situation was dire. The Germans controlled the coasts of Norway, Denmark, Belgium, Holland, and northern France, allowing them to build up their surface and submarine fleets and air force, threatening Britain itself and disrupting its sea lanes. Without raw materials and provisions from the colonies and dominions, and under blockade, Britain was doomed to defeat.

There was also a real threat of invasion and occupation of Britain itself. In accordance with the Operation Sea Lion plan, the Nazis concentrated up to 4 ships in the ports of occupied countries, capable of transporting a 500-strong force. According to German General Karl Tippelskirch, two armies—25 divisions—were concentrated in Belgium and Northern France. With their second-line forces and reserves, the Germans could field 39 divisions, plus significant air and naval forces.

The moment for a strike was extremely favorable. In August 1940, London had only five combat-ready divisions to defend the metropolis. The units rescued from Dunkirk were demoralized mobs, having lost their heavy weapons and equipment, all supplies and equipment. Time was needed to restore them to order. The forces needed to defend the vast coastline were very limited. Patrols with hunting rifles had to be deployed. But time passed, the shattered troops were rebuilt, and new units were formed. By mid-September, the number of combat-ready divisions had grown to 16. The window of opportunity was closing.

In 1942, Churchill acknowledged that German elite forces could wreak "lethal devastation in our ranks." However, he had no intention of surrendering, even if England itself were lost, and proposed continuing the war by relying on the vast colonial empire and the dominions (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and Ireland). The authorities of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand also insisted on continuing the war.

At the same time, Britain itself had a strong pro-German wing that wanted to officially make peace with the German Reich. They said, "Let them fight the Russians, and then we'll see." Hitler and Ribbentrop established contacts with this party. Peace proposals were voiced personally by the Führer and were sent through neutral countries.

In particular, negotiations were conducted through the American envoy Heath. The Germans stated that they did not wish to see the British Empire dissolved. They proposed that Roosevelt initiate Anglo-German peace negotiations. On Hitler's behalf, the German envoy, G. Wohlthat, proposed an alliance of the three northern nations—Germany, Britain, and the United States. In this case, the British would have to renounce their interests in Europe.

On the other hand, Hitler exerted military pressure to force Britain into peace. Thus, until October 1940, the German Luftwaffe actively waged an air war against England.

The British requested military assistance from the United States. The Americans were more than happy to begin selling off their pre-produced mountains. weaponsIn the summer of 1940, they transferred a large quantity of small arms, approximately 200 cannons. They also agreed to supply England with some of the production of their military aircraft factories, which was intended for the American armed forces.


Pilots of No. 85 Squadron RAF scramble to their Hurricane fighters at Debden Airfield, a satellite of RAF Castle Camps, July 1940.


Gunners of the coastal battery "A" of the 527th (Hampshire) coastal regiment artillery Taking up combat positions during a training alert. A 9,2-inch gun is shown in the frame. August 1940.

"Strange War" - continuation


As World War II scholars note, the plan for the invasion of the British Isles, unlike the attacks on Poland, France, and later Russia, was very strange and "uncertain." The objectives and instructions were accompanied by caveats—"if necessary..." and "if the need for this remains..." Hitler himself wavered, alternately offering peace, both officially and unofficially, and making threats.

Representatives of the army, navy and aviation They couldn't find common ground. The admirals remembered the British naval superiority in World War I, and now the situation was even worse. The navy was being rebuilt almost from scratch, and land and air programs were the priority. Germany simply didn't have the resources to quickly build a powerful navy. The pilots, led by Göring, on the other hand, greatly overestimated their capabilities. They believed the Luftwaffe alone could bring Britain to its knees. The army command was skeptical; such large-scale amphibious operations had never been undertaken. What if the British were able to defeat the amphibious assault? The specific nature of war with a maritime power frightened the generals.

Even after the plan was approved, debate continued. The naval command, led by Admiral Raeder, believed that time had already been lost. Autumn storms were approaching, which would disrupt the landing. Even if the landings were successful, the subsequent weather would hinder the delivery of reinforcements and reserves, disrupting supplies to the forward forces. Complete air supremacy was also required, which had not been achieved.

On August 15, 1940, Göring launched Operation Eagle. He launched three air fleets against Britain: Field Marshal Kesselring's 2nd Fleet, Field Marshal Sperrle's 3rd Fleet, and General Stumpf's 5th Fleet. A total of 1300 bombers and 950 fighters. The initial strikes targeted airfields and other military installations, which was wise. But the Luftwaffe command made a mistake—it underestimated the relatively new weapons, the system. Defense, radars, and pilot alert stations. The radar station was subjected to one serious attack and then left alone.

As a result, the British detected the enemy in a timely manner and managed to dispatch aircraft to intercept them. This allowed them to engage the enemy with a smaller force, maneuver, and transfer aircraft from one area to another. The British pilots fought desperately. The Germans suffered heavy losses. Thus, the 5th Air Fleet, based in Scandinavia, was withdrawn from the battle.

But the British were also struggling. Pilots flew several sorties a day, becoming exhausted. Over the course of a month of fighting, British fighter aircraft lost over 450 aircraft and a quarter of their pilots. German losses were somewhat lower. This means that Germany could have crushed the British Air Force and gained air superiority.


British Spitfire fighters in the skies of England, 1940.

However, both sides soon changed priorities – they began bombing cities. The Germans had already destroyed a significant portion of the enemy's airfields, and then the Führer's order was to bomb the cities. Terrorism had no effect; it only served to unite the nation. The British air defense and the Royal Air Force gained a respite and were able to restore damaged airfields and radar stations.


The Nazi bombing of London. Bombs fall near the famous St. Paul's Cathedral.

The British also managed to steal a German cipher machine and create a decryption device. They gained the unique ability to read encrypted German radiograms, orders, reports, and other documents. This system, dubbed "Ultra," was kept top secret. Decrypted data was passed only to Churchill and the high command of the armed forces. The British prime minister personally decided how to use this information. The obtained data was always concealed, disguised as having been obtained by conventional intelligence, agents, and so on.

German sailors complained that they lacked the necessary landing resources. The British air force and navy were indeed ravaging ports in the English Channel and France. As a result, Hitler first postponed the start of the amphibious operation to late September, and then to early October. And when he began receiving reports of destruction in England and panic in London, the Führer decided there was no need to risk it. Why amphibious forces if air strikes would crush the British anyway?


A flight of German Dornier Do.17Z bombers en route to Great Britain, 1940.

Hitler's circle included plenty of Anglophiles who considered Britain a role model—an ideal "Eternal Reich" with an ideology of racism, the "white man's burden," and concentration camps for "subhumans." An empire that, on its path to world domination, exterminated millions of indigenous peoples of America, Africa, India, Australia, etc. It unleashed dozens of wars, “dividing and pitting” peoples and countries against each other.

There were also plenty of agents of the "global backstage" working for London and Washington. Arguments against the landing operation were supplied to the Führer by Abwehr chief Canaris (who worked for the British), the pro-Western wing of the generals, who were reluctant to fight Britain (and even earlier, France), diplomats, and senior figures of the Third Reich, such as Hess and Bormann. They believed that the Anglo-Saxons were a Germanic, kindred nation that had previously helped the Nazis seize power in Germany and Europe. The war with Britain was declared a tragic mistake, a misunderstanding.

At the same time, Canaris fed Hitler disinformation about the Soviet Union and its defensive strength. Russia's defensive potential was greatly underestimated! Russian railway capacity, military production, and mobilization resources were halved or even tripled. The Red Army was considered weak, supposedly unable to defeat even the Finns outright. Clearly, the Führer was still being pushed eastward.

As a result, the opportunity to take England with one bold and swift strike was lost. On October 12, Operation Sea Lion was cancelled, at least for 1940.


Adolf Hitler on his 52nd birthday. From left to right: Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring, Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel, and Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler. April 20, 1941.
108 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    2 July 2026 04: 49
    The Fuhrer himself was an Anglophile, as can be seen from his opus, Mein Kampf.
    At a meeting, Aloizych once said: "I'm in the position of a shooter with only one bullet left. And it's destined for the Kremlin."
    He was also alarmed by the Prut Operation, which brought the Red Army dangerously close to the Ploiesti oil wells.
    British intelligence has outplayed everyone again.
    1. +8
      2 July 2026 07: 18
      Complete air supremacy was also required, which was not achieved.

      This is the answer, the Blitzkrieg method itself required air superiority.
      1. +1
        2 July 2026 08: 18
        Quote: Civil
        Complete air supremacy was also required, which was not achieved.

        This is the answer, the Blitzkrieg method itself required air superiority.

        The successful landing on Crete in May 1941 was ensured by the dominance of German air power, which neutralized the British fleet. The Luftwaffe demonstrated how aircraft could deal with warships. The British lost three cruisers and six destroyers, and three battleships, an aircraft carrier, and seven destroyers were damaged, not counting transports. The German fleet suffered no losses, as it was absent. Of course, the German air force suffered losses...about 200 aircraft, but these losses were far less than the defeat of the British fleet.
        If the Germans had gained air superiority, the British fleet would not have helped.
        1. +4
          2 July 2026 10: 55
          You can't take Britain with paratroopers alone; the scale is completely different, which is why they refused. A landing operation by sea is the height of military skill. hi
          1. +2
            2 July 2026 10: 59
            Quote: Stirbjorn
            You can't take Britain with paratroopers alone; the scale is completely different, which is why they refused. A landing operation by sea is the height of military skill. hi

            Paratroopers must capture a beachhead for landing from ships and airfields for transport aircraft.
          2. +1
            2 July 2026 23: 42
            Quote: Stirbjorn
            You can't take Britain with just paratroopers,

            Over Britain, German air power began to suffer losses. Around September 15, 1940, the British had perfected counter-tactics against the Luftwaffe and began to deploy their resources more fully: they scrambled aircraft more quickly, learned to deploy them in greater numbers, and responded more quickly to German actions, deploying Czechoslovakian, French, and Polish fighter pilots. These additional factors tipped the scales in Britain's favor. By losing the air war in the Battle of Britain, Germany effectively lost World War II.
            1. +1
              6 July 2026 12: 17
              She hadn't lost anything yet. She lost it in 1941, missing Leningrad and Moscow and finding herself fighting on two fronts in 1942. Of course, there was a moment of truth for us – the autumn of 1941 – and we held out. War on two fronts was the Führer's main strategic mistake. If he had negotiated peace with the British (Rudolf Hess, 1940), then we would have had to fight only with them. And the Anglo-Saxons wouldn't have helped us. And then everything would have been much more difficult. Although it's hard to imagine anything worse than the autumn of 1941.
              1. 0
                6 July 2026 12: 52
                Quote: Glagol1
                She hadn't lost anything yet.

                After World War II, the intelligence, military, and diplomatic services of the United States and Great Britain commissioned the most intelligent generals of the defeated countries to recount the history of the war as it was seen by the high-ranking military leaders of the defeated countries. The definition "Germany lost the air war over Britain, and therefore lost the entire war" is taken from a work in this series devoted to the history of the German Air Force in World War II. When I read that book, this idea also surprised me, but there is a large grain of truth in it.
        2. +6
          2 July 2026 12: 30
          Quote: Konnick
          The successful landing on Crete in May 41 was ensured by the dominance of German aviation, which neutralized the British fleet.

          The successful landing on Crete in May 41 was ensured by the complete absence of British aviation. smile
          It's unlikely that such a thing can be hoped for in the Channel. And given that the RN forces alone, based in southern British ports, completely outnumber the entire Kriegsmarine, which still hasn't recovered from Norway, the landing force will land right on the bottom of the Channel.
          Quote: Konnick
          If the Germans had gained air superiority, the British fleet would not have helped.

          To repel the landing, the Limey will concentrate all air groups from the center and north to the Canal, ensuring a local superiority in forces. As for the ships, Crete demonstrated that even without fighter cover, battleships can hold out against Luftwaffe attacks.
          1. +1
            2 July 2026 12: 54
            Quote: Alexey RA
            The successful landing on Crete in May 41 was ensured by the complete absence of British aviation.

            You're mistaken. The German paratroopers' primary target was three Cretan airfields, while the Luftwaffe attacked the aircraft carrier Formidable. Forty-six British aircraft were destroyed. The air force demonstrated complete superiority over the navy.
            As for the ships, Crete showed that even without fighter cover, battleships could hold out under attack from the Luftwaffe.

            The goal wasn't to destroy the British battleships. The battleships were forced to flee, as were the British air forces. Then, in 42, there was Operation Vigores, where even the battleship Centurion, converted to anti-aircraft batteries, was of no help.
            And I wrote that if Goering had fulfilled his promise to gain air superiority over the English Channel, then the English fleet would not have been able to hinder the landing operation.
            1. +2
              2 July 2026 13: 55
              Quote: Konnick
              then the English fleet would not have been able to interfere with the landing operation.

              Indeed, the Channel is too narrow for the concentration of rockets to disrupt the landing operation under Luftwaffe attack, provided, of course, that the Germans gain air superiority. A case in point is the fate of the Baltic Fleet at the beginning of WWII.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. +3
              2 July 2026 14: 29
              Quote: Konnick
              You're wrong. The German paratroopers' primary target was three Cretan airfields.

              When the intensified bombing of Crete began, the Royal Navy base at Maleme, commanded by Captain 2nd Rank J.N. Beale, had three Gladiators and three Fulmars, not counting the three Royal Air Force Hurricanes that had arrived from Greece. The pilots and aircraft were completely unprepared for the intense combat that lay ahead. Nevertheless, naval aviators Lieutenant Commander Alan Black, Lieutenant R.E. Brabner, and Flight Lieutenant Edward Howell (who was piloting a Hurricane for the first time in his life) managed to shoot down six Messerschmitts. The following day, 40 German aircraft were attacked by two Hurricanes.
              After this, there were no serviceable aircraft left in Maleme, and the surviving pilots were sent to Egypt. Biel remained in Maleme with the ground crew to organize the defense.
              © S. Pak "Battle for Crete"
              Quote: Konnick
              and the Luftwaffe attacked the aircraft carrier Formidable

              The aircraft carrier Formidable was moored in Alexandria during the tragic days of May 20–23. Since arriving in the Mediterranean, she had been engaged in almost continuous operations, helping to escort two convoys, then the Battle of Matapan, the shelling of Tripoli, and the evacuation of the British from Greece. Her 826th and 829th torpedo squadrons had been severely depleted, and her 803rd and 806th fighter squadrons had been virtually destroyed. Having lost her air group, the carrier became one of the most useless ships in the fleet.
              By Saturday, May 24, Empire Day, 12 of the roughly patched-up Fulmars had been brought back to service, although the reliability of some of them remained more than questionable.

              The Royal Air Force in the Middle East operated under severe shortages of manpower and resources, lacking well-located bases. With limited aircraft, they were unable to provide the Army and Navy with the support they would in subsequent years. However, the Royal Air Force lost 23 bombers and 23 fighters. Courageous pilots in Marylands, Blenheims, Wellingtons, and Hurricanes operated from North African airfields. Fighter pilots were forced to fly with incomplete ammunition loads in order to use drop tanks, which allowed them to spend more time in combat zones.
              © ibid.
              In other words, fighters from North Africa attempted to cover the evacuation of Crete and the island itself. Furthermore, RAF fighters assigned to cover the ships regularly failed to locate them at sea. As a result, the fighter umbrella operated only in the vicinity of Alexandria.
              Are you saying that it will be the same when we land on the Island? wink
              Quote: Konnick
              Then, in 42, there was Operation Vigores, where even the battleship Centurion, converted into anti-aircraft batteries, did not help.

              This former target ship's entire air defense consists of four single-barrel Mark II pom-poms and 17 Oerlikons. No anti-aircraft guns. Overall, it's only slightly better than a destroyer's air defense.
              Quote: Konnick
              And I wrote that if Goering had fulfilled his promise to gain air superiority over the English Channel, then the English fleet would not have been able to hinder the landing operation.

              The problem is that even if the Luftwaffe gains air superiority over the English Channel, the Limeys still have two air groups that the RAF will never commit to combat. The Limeys will maintain reserves for an anti-landing operation, even at the cost of burning cities.
              1. -1
                2 July 2026 14: 45
                What are you trying to say with that comment? That the landing operation was impossible? Enough about the two Limey groups... the landing operation failed due to a lack of German air power... there weren't enough pilots. It was easier for the British to defend their own territory, and German pilots were captured, that's all. A pilot isn't an airplane; you can't fix it quickly. Germany, and Japan, would still face a pilot shortage in the second half of the war. They couldn't achieve air superiority, and all this talk about Hitler's Anglophilia is nonsense.
                1. 0
                  3 July 2026 11: 12
                  Quote: Konnick
                  What are you trying to say with your comment? That the landing operation was impossible?

                  Yes. No air superiority means no airborne assault. And air superiority is impossible to achieve because the range of the Lyfts is determined by the combat radius of the 109s. There's no hope of attacking airfields beyond that radius—the only option is to shoot down Limey fighters in the air. But the problem is that the Limey base their airborne reserves just outside that radius and conserve them until the last minute.
                  Quote: Konnick
                  Germany, and Japan as well, would continue to face a pilot shortage in the second half of the war. They failed to achieve air superiority, and all these speculations about Hitler's Anglophilia are nonsense.

                  I don't argue with that. And Britain itself didn't really want to become a province of the Euroreich. A united Europe was worse than a sharp knife. smile
            4. -1
              2 July 2026 18: 17
              Here we go again, "if only"... Goering could not have ensured air superiority, physically he could not have, not at all.
        3. 0
          2 July 2026 14: 58
          The British fleet was routed? Yes, there were losses, there was damage, but the rout... Very brave.
          1. -2
            2 July 2026 15: 16
            Quote: Grencer81
            The British fleet was routed? Yes, there were losses, there was damage, but the rout... Very brave.

            Have you read it? During the Crete operation, the group the British hoped would defend the island without air support was routed. I didn't write about the entire British fleet; don't distort things...
            1. 0
              2 July 2026 17: 26
              Me? I read it... And not just your "opus." Do you think the British were so stupid that they thought they could defend Crete without air support?
              Or maybe there was another reason for this?
  2. 0
    2 July 2026 05: 02
    I once came across the AI ​​"British SS" - an interesting detective story.
    I am all for this development of history.
  3. -1
    2 July 2026 05: 37
    Regarding the free city of Memel, according to the Treaty of Versailles, this Prussian city was a mandate of the League of Nations. Memel had previously been part of Prussia for 500 years, and later of the German Empire. In 1923, Lithuania simply annexed Memel and the Memel region. This is the same Lithuania that Lenin granted independence just a few years earlier. A few years later, Lithuania organized "little green men" in Memel, and they annexed Memel and the Memel region to Lithuania. Moreover, no one asked the opinion of the Germans living there. Germany was simply catastrophically weak at the time. There was no one to stand up for the Germans of Memel. So when Lithuania raves today about Russia's "little green men" who helped Russia reclaim its territory in Crimea, with the absolute support of the local population, let it not forget that a hundred years ago, Lithuania's little green men annexed the city of Memel, which had never belonged to Lithuania, without even asking the consent of the Germans living there. That's not the worst of it. It's rarely published, but it is known for certain that after WWII, there were plans to annex the entire Kaliningrad region to the Lithuanian SSR. But Stalin changed his mind just in time.
    1. 0
      2 July 2026 07: 00
      I don’t know what Stalin thought and whether he himself decided such issues, but now Kaliningrad is the most vulnerable region of Russia.
    2. -1
      2 July 2026 17: 28
      There were plans to annex Memel to the Kaliningrad region, but unfortunately, Stalin decided to play the "friendship of peoples" game and gave it to Lithuania.
  4. +8
    2 July 2026 07: 19
    So many bloopers, the article seems to be on point, but because of them the whole impression is ruined.
    The British managed to steal a German cipher machine
    Yes, they captured it on U 110
    the defeat of Czechoslovakia
    In what battle? Well, little things like "flying over the English Channel"—the English sometimes call the English Channel a channel, just as a name—and there are also "pearls." wink
    1. 0
      4 July 2026 06: 23
      Not sometimes, but always. In English, this strait is called the English Channel or simply the Channel, reflecting its geography—a strip of water separating England from the continent. In French, the same strait is called La Mânche (literally, "the sleeve"), reflecting its shape, reminiscent of a shirt sleeve. In Russian, this strait is usually referred to in the French manner. This has been the case since the nobility in the Russian Empire began to prefer all things French.
  5. +4
    2 July 2026 07: 29
    Hitler's circle included plenty of Anglophiles who considered Britain a role model—an ideal "Eternal Reich" with an ideology of racism, the "white man's burden," and concentration camps for "subhumans."
    Of course, Hitler himself had a reverence for the Anglicans and this is the main reason. All his steps, starting with the stop order at Dunkirk, the peace proposal of July 19, 40.
    "At this hour I feel obliged to my conscience to appeal to the prudence of England. I see no reason why this war should be continued."
    and Hess's flight, were aimed at making a deal with the British, there were grounds for that. In England, however, it should not be forgotten, a strong pro-German lobby among the English aristocracy and beyond The same former King of Great Britain, Edward VIII, Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, Albert Vogler, Sir Ivor Shakespeare, and even Hess landed at the Douglas-Hamilton estate, whom Douglas, the 14th Duke of Hamilton, had personally known during his visits to Germany. Apparently, the attraction was mutual. Kim Philby sent an interesting report.
    In his report, he stated: "The widespread belief that Hess arrived in Britain unexpectedly is false. Long before the flight, Hess corresponded on this matter with the Duke of Hamilton, discussing all the details of the proposed flight. However, all letters written to Hamilton never reached him. Hamilton's supposed replies were fabricated by intelligence. This is how Hess was lured to Britain... In his letters, Hess outlined in considerable detail the German government's plans for an attack on the Soviet Union. These letters also contained proposals for an end to the war between Britain and Germany." Philby also reported on Hess's conversations with the Duke of Hamilton, and then with Lord Beaverbrook and British Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden after his landing in Scotland.
    So, not everything is simple in the relations between Nazi Germany and Britain in the 40-41s.
    1. -3
      2 July 2026 08: 47
      Yes, and the future queen, along with her mother, was partial to the Nazis, although she was quite young, but psychologists say that the foundations of personality are laid before the age of seven, so...
      1. +7
        2 July 2026 09: 49
        During World War II, the future queen voluntarily served in the British army as an ambulance driver, although she did not take direct part in the fighting against the Nazis.
        1. +5
          2 July 2026 12: 31
          Well, yes, the last head of state was a participant in the war. soldier
          (do not confuse "participant" and "veteran")
          1. +3
            2 July 2026 13: 02
            In our terms, she's a war veteran. Participants are considered veterans.
            Federal Law of 12.01.1995 N 5-FZ (as amended on 20.02.2026) "On Veterans".
            1. +3
              2 July 2026 14: 13
              Quote from solar
              Participants are treated as veterans.

              I didn't know. My father didn't live to see it, but he was a participant. request
      2. +1
        2 July 2026 13: 13
        So the kinship obliged. First the Hanoverian, then the Saxe-Coburg and Gotha dynasties, during WWI circumstances She was forced to become the Queen of Windsor. Moreover, Ernst August of Hanover's relatives served in the Luftwaffe, and Christoph Ernst August of Hesse was an ardent Nazi from 1931. In February 1932, he joined the SS, was a member of the Berlin Standard, and rose to the rank of SS-Oberführer. After the outbreak of World War II, he voluntarily went to the front with the Luftwaffe. So, if the "war party," led by Churchill, had not prevailed, no one knows how history would have turned out. For example, some politicians, such as Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax, advocated for a peaceful settlement.
        1. +1
          2 July 2026 23: 41
          It's not surprising that many aristocrats were related. There weren't many of them. But that didn't stop them from fighting each other.
          The First World War is known as the War of the Three Cousins: King George V of England was a first cousin of Emperor Nicholas II of Russia—their mothers were sisters—and Emperor Wilhelm II of Germany and George V were direct grandchildren of Queen Victoria. This ruler, who had nine children and 42 grandchildren, deservedly earned the unofficial title of "grandmother of all Europe." Her numerous royal offspring indeed subsequently linked virtually all ruling houses. The last Russian empress was also her granddaughter.
        2. +1
          2 July 2026 23: 49
          Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax advocated for a peaceful settlement

          Until Hitler's invasion of the Czech Republic.
          The Munich crisis led Halifax to take a harder line than Chamberlain against further concessions to Germany. ... Halifax issued guarantees to Poland on March 31, 1939, prompted by alarming intelligence about German preparations, in the hope of sending clear signals to Germany that, in Halifax's words, "there would be no more Munichs."
          1. -1
            3 July 2026 05: 43
            Quote from solar
            Until Hitler's invasion of the Czech Republic

            In May 1940, during World War II, the British War Cabinet was divided over whether to negotiate peace terms with Germany or continue the war. Those in favor of continuing the war were led by Prime Minister Winston Churchill, while those in favor of negotiations were led by Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax. The disagreement reached a breaking point and threatened to overthrow Churchill's government. At a War Cabinet meeting on May 26, 1940, Halifax proposed that Mussolini act as a mediator in negotiations with Germany.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +1
              3 July 2026 08: 06
              In May 1940, during World War II, the British War Cabinet was divided over whether to negotiate peace terms with Germany or continue the fight.

              During the defeat at Dunkirk, he saw that the army couldn't sustain a war with Germany, and France wouldn't help them. The United States remained neutral. At that point, Churchill's proposals to continue the war looked like a gamble. In fact, that's exactly what it was – England was left fighting alone against Germany. The situation was saved by Hitler's stupidity on two issues: the attack on the USSR and Germany's declaration of war on the United States. But in May 1940, neither Halifax nor Churchill could have known this.
              1. 0
                3 July 2026 12: 42
                It was about
                Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax advocated for a peaceful settlement

                Until Hitler's invasion of the Czech Republic.
                And I spoke
                For example, some politicians, such as Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax, advocated finding a peaceful settlement.
                Somehow we need to decide what we're talking about.
    2. +5
      2 July 2026 13: 12
      Hess's flight was directed to a deal

      So what did Hess agree on? To sit in a 3x2 meter cell for the rest of his life? Mamkin's negotiator...
      The same former King of Great Britain Edward VIII

      They didn't have time to crown her. Cherchez la femme.
      1. 0
        2 July 2026 17: 57
        Quote from solar
        So what did Hess agree on? To sit in a 3x2 meter cell for the rest of his life? Mama's negotiator.

        So, what exactly did he agree to? Some of the materials from the "Hess case" in Britain were destroyed, while others remain classified. Specifically, the transcripts of Hess's interrogations conducted by British intelligence agencies are classified until 2040, with the possibility of extension. That's why he kept his mouth shut, buying his life. And while he was in prison, he was forbidden to say or write anything about the "peace mission" he undertook in May 1941. His correspondence and visits with relatives and lawyers were monitored by the prison administration. As soon as his release loomed, he suddenly died, although according to those who interacted with him, he had no intention of dying for at least the next five years.
        Quote from solar
        They didn't have time to crown her. Cherchez la femme

        Yes, but nevertheless I corrected it, over the course of ten months, from January 20 to December 11, 1936.
        1. +7
          2 July 2026 18: 18
          That's exactly what you agreed on?

          What about? Sitting in solitary confinement until he was 93? Was his life miserable on the outside?
          Yes, but nevertheless I corrected it over the course of ten months.

          Symbolically. In England, kings have long had only symbolic functions, and they didn't even have time to crown this one.
          His correspondence and meetings with relatives and lawyers were controlled by the prison administration.

          as in any prison.
          As soon as his release loomed, he suddenly died, for some reason, although according to those who spoke with him, he had no intention of dying for at least the next five years.

          Optimist. It's hard to plan for that at 93.
          1. -1
            2 July 2026 19: 28
            Quote from solar
            What about? Sitting in solitary confinement until he was 93? Was his life miserable on the outside?

            Who would have given him freedom? They could have hanged him, like some of his accomplices. Better off in a cell with walks, a diet, and medical supervision.
            Quote from solar
            Symbolically. In England, kings have long had only symbolic functions, and they didn't even have time to crown this one.

            Well, it depends on how you say it, symbolic or not, the king has both a representative and, to a certain extent, formal, but still significant role.
            Quote from solar
            as in any prison

            Well, not in every one. Even in the Soviet Union there were different ones. modesGeneral, enhanced, strict and special, and the conditions there are different.
            Quote from solar
            Optimist. It's hard to plan for that at 93.

            So they are all optimists. Rudolf von Ribbentrop, son of Joachim von Ribbentrop, Hauptsturmführer of the SS, holder of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross, lived to be 98 years old?!
            1. +2
              2 July 2026 21: 43
              Well, not in any one.

              So he had a life sentence, so the regime was the strictest.
              the king has both a representative and, to a certain extent, a formal

              He didn't even have time to go through the formalities of coronation.
              Who would give him freedom?

              Do you think he knew in advance how the war would end?
              1. -2
                3 July 2026 05: 33
                Quote from solar
                So he had a life sentence, so the regime was the strictest.

                It's the hardest one in the "Black Dolphin", and in Spandau in 66, they put up a little house for rest during walks, otherwise poor Hess would get tired. what
                Quote from solar
                He didn't even have time to go through the formalities of coronation.

                Does this change anything?
                Quote from solar
                Do you think he knew in advance how the war would end?

                Yeah, his successor, Bormann, was also considered free, as was Müller... but look? And Hess, the English would probably have given him a separate apartment with a sea view and permanent residency. lol
                1. +2
                  3 July 2026 08: 19
                  in Spandau in 66, they built a small house

                  The discussion was about the correspondence mode.
                  Does this change anything?

                  Given the symbolism of the monarch's figure, it changes. He is not crowned.
                  Yeah, his successor Bormann was also considered free, just like Müller... but where?

                  So what? Do you think that if Hess had known in advance that everything would end this way, he would still have done the same thing?
                  1. 0
                    3 July 2026 12: 36
                    Quote from solar
                    The discussion was about the correspondence mode.

                    It was about the detention regime.
                    Quote from solar
                    Given the symbolism of the monarch's figure, it changes. Not crowned.

                    Don't talk nonsense, the King is dead - long live the King! On September 8, 2022, the Queen and Charles III quacked.officially became king , the issue is resolved. Any official sources This will be confirmed. Edward VIII became king on January 20, 1936 and carefully abdicated the throne December 11.12 of the same year. And the coronation, a costumed performance for the crowd. Regarding the symbolism, visit the royal house's website and you'll learn a lot of interesting things.
                    Quote from solar
                    So what? Do you think that if Hess had known in advance that everything would end this way, he would still have done the same thing?

                    Hess was tried as one of 24 major war criminals, regardless of its flight.
    3. 0
      2 July 2026 14: 38
      Quote: Unknown
      All his steps, starting with the stop order at Dunkirk, the peace proposal of July 19, 40.

      Regarding Dunkirk and the halt order—what does Hitler have to do with it? The panic was caused by von Rundstedt, who, after reports of the Allied counterattack at Arras and British tanks crushing German positions, halted the offensive the day before Hitler approved the order, which was already being carried out. Moreover, it was he who persuaded Hitler to initial the order. smile
      Quote: Unknown
      In England, we must not forget, there was a strong pro-German lobby among the English aristocracy and not only

      The pro-German lobby is all very well and good, but what about the position of the former Empire's main creditor? wink The one whose needle has had limeys hooked since 1940?
      This creditor doesn't need the Euroreich or a quick peace in Europe. He needs a functioning "Runway No. 1," along which American quartermasters have been roaming since the spring of 1941, selecting locations for US Army bases. And the strategy for the future joint war between Britain and the still-neutral US was determined in February 1941: the main adversary would be Germany, and the first strike would be against Italy, the weakest member of the Axis.
      1. -1
        2 July 2026 19: 01
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Regarding Dunkirk and the halt order—what does Hitler have to do with it? The panic was caused by von Rundstedt, who, after reports of the Allied counterattack at Arras and British tanks crushing German positions, halted the offensive the day before Hitler approved the order, which was already being carried out. Moreover, it was he who persuaded Hitler to initial the order.

        Well, of course the generals are to blame, it can’t be otherwise. lol Who made the final decision—Hitler or not? Like, Sea Lion was cancelled because of the British Navy, incomplete air superiority, etc. It's somehow forgotten that on February 6, 1941, in response to Mussolini's request, the German OKW began an operation to transfer two tank divisions to Libya to prevent a further British advance and their breakthrough into Tripolitania. And that's it. with the Royal Navy in complete control of the Mediterranean and the Luftwaffe not in complete control!?
        Quote: Alexey RA
        The pro-German lobby is all very well and good, but what about the position of the former Empire's main creditor? The one whose needle the Limies have been hooked on since 1940?

        And what were their positions? Ford sympathized with the Nazis. Joseph Patrick Kennedy Sr., father of future US President John F. Kennedy, also sympathized with Nazi Germany and openly demonstrated this while serving as US Ambassador to Great Britain from 1938 to 1940, for which Anglos demanded the US remove him. The approximately 2,7 million people of Irish descent living in the US at the time also had little love for England. And the isolationist movement was the most widespread and influential force. The America First Committee, led by Charles Lindbergh, was one of the most famous isolationist groups. So there were plenty of Nazi supporters overseas, too. Of course, they couldn't compete with the Jewish lobby... but what would have happened if Hitler had softened the Jewish question? Moreover, today's examples provide food for thought. When the Jew Zelensky turns a blind eye to torchlight processions and sometimes even encourages homegrown Nazis, while another Jew, Abramovich, contributes to the liberation and brings home the ardent Nazis of "Azov," the question arises: is everything so clear with the Holocaust?
        1. 0
          3 July 2026 11: 28
          Quote: Unknown
          Well, of course the generals are to blame, it can't be any other way. lol Who made the final decision, Hitler or not?

          Hitler made the decision retroactively - he saw and signed the stop order the day after it was to be executed.
          And then in their memoirs, the defeated generals blamed everything on stupid corporal ™. Well, you can't admit that you screwed up in a text written for self-praise. smile
          Quote: Unknown
          It's somehow forgotten that on February 6, 1941, in response to Mussolini's request, the German OKW launched an operation to transfer two tank divisions to Libya to prevent further British advances and their breakthrough into Tripolitania. And this, despite the Royal Navy's complete dominance in the Mediterranean and the Luftwaffe's limited dominance!

          In January-March 1941, the Germans managed to gain local air and naval supremacy in the Malta area, taking advantage of the island's small air force and its isolation from the main naval bases. First, they disabled the Illustrious (torpers pulled the SARs to low altitudes, and the dive bombers performed their attacks as if they were on a firing range—a familiar pattern), then they bombed Malta itself.
          There were too few fighters left on Malta to repel these attacks. No more than six Hurricanes were airworthy—they were all that remained of the modern fighters. Besides them, there were three slow-flying Fulmars abandoned by Illustrious and one ancient Gladiator.
          © D. Macintyre "Battle for the Mediterranean"
          The result was well described by Admiral Cunningham:
          It seems some people here don't have a clear understanding of the state of our Air Force. I feel the Chiefs of Staff are getting completely incorrect information about the number of fighter squadrons available. Longmore has literally scraped the bottom of everything, and we have far fewer than people in England think. The Germans have put the squeeze on us in Cyrenaica. We believe that the Germans and Italians have over 200 aircraft to our 30.
          Regarding Malta, I spoke with the Air Vice-Marshal, whose report I'm quoting. He said the Germans have completely overwhelmed us. He only has eight serviceable Hurricanes left. He's sent six more from his meager reserves here, but that doesn't solve anything. He needs two full squadrons immediately.

          In addition, the backlashes also affected a group of RN ships supporting the coastal flank of the British army in Africa.
          And after that, taking advantage of German air superiority and the cleared sea, the Italians began transporting Rommel's forces.
          1. 0
            3 July 2026 13: 01
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Hitler made his decision retroactively

            Hitler made a decision and no one else. Guderian, who commanded the 19th Corps at the time, which was at the forefront of the main attack, assessed Hitler's stop order as "having a disastrous effect on the entire course of the war." But another author of "lost victories"
            Manstein wrote that allowing the English army to evacuate from Dunkirk was Hitler's decisive mistake.
            Quote: Alexey RA
            D. Macintyre, "The Battle of the Mediterranean"
            The result was well described by Admiral Cunningham:

            Anglicoses backdating Always smart...but the Mediterranean is not the English Channel. Manstein believed that a Wehrmacht landing on the island was entirely possible, even without the German air force's superiority over the British. So the opinions of the Nazi generals differ.
            1. 0
              3 July 2026 16: 40
              Quote: Unknown
              Hitler and no one else made the decision. Guderian, who commanded the XIX Corps at the time, which was at the spearhead of the main attack, assessed Hitler's stop order as "having a disastrous effect on the entire course of the war."

              The problem is that the memoirs of German generals are not confirmed by German documents. smile By the time Hitler became familiar with the order, it was already being carried out.
              Hitler's "stop order" is like "Hitler's order to turn toward Kyiv," which ultimately turned out to be a consequence of Guderian's own turn south. Or like the well-known "tank encounter battle near Prokhorovka," which, according to documents, turned out to be an uncoordinated attack by Soviet tank corps on the German defenses.
              Quote: Unknown
              The English are always smart in hindsight...but the Mediterranean is not the English Channel.

              True. The Mediterranean doesn't have as many airfields, aircraft, or naval assets as the southern coast of the Island. And there's no way to base and operate against the enemy from beyond the range of the 109s. It's either Malta or... nothing. Once Malta is taken, we can at least cross from Sicily to Africa by boat, because the Limes can't fly or swim to the communications lines.
              1. 0
                3 July 2026 19: 29
                Quote: Alexey RA
                The problem is that the memoirs of German generals are not supported by German documents. By the time Hitler received the order, it was already being carried out.

                Let's say our documents also don't confirm everything in the memoirs of our generals, Zhukov for example... but we take them at their word. fellow Rundstedt told Hitler, what he wanted to hear Later Hitler not a single time did not blame the generals for not wanting to land on the island.
                Quote: Alexey RA
                True. The Mediterranean doesn't have as many airfields, aircraft, or naval assets as the southern coast of the Island. And there's no way to base and operate against the enemy from beyond the range of the 109s. It's either Malta or... nothing. Once Malta is taken, we can at least cross from Sicily to Africa by boat, because the Limes can't fly or swim to the communications lines.
                That's also true, but it remained in Normandy and Brittany. extensive network The French had no excellent airfields. The Luftwaffe's presence on the English Channel coast far outnumbered that in northern Italy. Landing on the island was possible if there had been a will, but it wasn't. Apart from Malta, the closest place to Africa is Sicily, but it doesn't have a comparable network of airfields, and the route is long and unsafe. Later, the Americans had no trouble shooting down German transports. even bombers!? A group of American B-25 bombers, covered by P-38 fighters, encountered a large group of German Junkers Ju-52 transport aircraft in the Strait of Sicily. Of the 35 Ju-52s, the Americans shot down 25! Nevertheless, the Germans regularly They supplied their Afrika Korps with manpower and equipment from 40 to 43, despite the increase in the British Air Force in Malta and the North African coast. Moreover, there were plans to capture Malta with airborne forces... but something went wrong, which they later regretted.
                1. +1
                  6 July 2026 11: 33
                  Quote: Unknown
                  That's also true, but in Normandy and Brittany, the French left behind a vast network of excellent airfields.

                  On the other side, the British were confronted by an equally extensive network of excellent airfields. Moreover, some of them were outside the range of German air power.
                  Quote: Unknown
                  The Luftwaffe's presence on the English Channel coast far exceeded that in northern Italy.

                  As did the RAF's numbers. Which, moreover, didn't have to fly across practically the entire combat radius to meet the Germans.
                  Quote: Unknown
                  Nevertheless, the Germans regularly supplied their Afrika Korps with manpower and equipment from 40 to 43, despite the increase in the British Air Force in Malta and the North African coast.

                  Malta physically couldn't accommodate enough aircraft to counter the Luftwaffe group in Sicily. The island was saved only by the Germans' vacillations between it and Africa, driven by adventurism and Rommel's unfulfilled promises to reach Alexandria.
                  The RAF in North Africa only reached German communications at the final stage of transportation - when the supplies delivered to Africa were already being distributed in parts.
          2. 0
            6 July 2026 13: 29
            Quote: Alexey RA
            And after that, taking advantage of German air superiority and the cleared sea, the Italians began transporting Rommel's forces.

            Italy, entering the war on Hitler's side, had plans to unite Italy's colonial possessions in Africa by attacking from Libya and taking active action in Ethiopia, capturing Sudan, Somalia, Palestine, Syria, Egypt, Kenya, and Tanzania. However, Britain was able to defeat the Italian army. Only the emergence of the Luftwaffe and the Balkan front saved Italy from losing all its colonial possessions in 1940. Britain was forced to send its air force and mobile troops to Greece, where they were bled dry by the Germans. Consequently, the Germans and Italians counterattacked in Africa and achieved military success. But by then, German forces had to be redirected toward Russia. Hitler did not give Rommel sufficient forces to either reach the Suez Canal or capture Malta. Initially, the British managed to stop the Germans at El Alamein, then transferred fighters to Malta, and then a fuel tanker. As this happened, aircraft from Malta began repelling attacks by Italian and German bombers and inflicting heavy damage on convoys to Africa. For both the Germans and the British, everything hung by a thread until victory at El Alamein. The British simply had fighter squadrons in Malta and a tanker of aviation fuel at the right time.
        2. 0
          3 July 2026 11: 41
          Quote: Unknown
          And what are the positions there?

          Simple.
          America's territorial interests are concentrated in the Western Hemisphere.
          The security of the British Commonwealth must be maintained at all times, including maintaining its position in the Far East.
          The security of sea communications between the Allied Powers is of paramount importance.
          The early elimination of Fascist Italy as an Axis partner.
          Support for neutral powers and underground resistance groups in the fight against the Axis.
          A sustained air offensive to destroy Axis military power.
          Build-up of forces for a subsequent offensive against Germany and the capture of positions from which this offensive could be launched.
          The Atlantic and European regions are the decisive theater of military operations and, as such, are the primary focus of US military efforts.
          The Middle East and Africa are of great importance.
          If Japan enters the war, the strategy of military operations in the Far East will be defensive.

          This is the strategy for joint action between Britain and the United States, agreed upon at the ABC-1 conference in February 1941, which served as the basis for all US pre-war plans.
          As for entering a war as the one being attacked—FDR had no equal. The Reich doesn't want to declare war on the US? No problem—let's introduce a Neutrality Patrol and assign it a zone of responsibility covering half the Atlantic, constantly shifting it eastward, and allow it to attack any submarines in that zone. Still don't want to attack? Let's escort convoys with USN ships. Let's manufacture weapons, equipment, and even warships for Britain. Let's openly transfer weapons from American arsenals in such quantities that their own generals will demand supply restrictions, since they have nothing to arm the rapidly growing "Roosevelt Army" (from 4 divisions to 50-55 in a couple of years). Let's allow active US Army personnel to fight on the British side (without being discharged).

          The US needs a war in Europe. It's long, bloody, weakening all sides... and profitable. But to prevent the Yankees from getting screwed over like they did last time at Versailles, the US must enter this war closer to the start and ultimately "save" Europe.
          1. 0
            3 July 2026 13: 16
            Quote: Alexey RA
            The US needs a war in Europe. It's long, bloody, weakening all sides... and profitable. But to prevent the Yankees from getting screwed over like they did last time at Versailles, the US must enter this war closer to the start and ultimately "save" Europe.

            It’s hard to disagree.
            If we see that Germany is winning the war, we should help Russia; if Russia is winning, we should help Germany, and let them kill each other as much as possible, although I don't want to see Hitler as the winner under any circumstances. Neither of them keeps their word.
            At the same time, we must not forget that certain circles in the United States were ready to make peace with the Nazis - Operation Sunrise
            1. 0
              6 July 2026 13: 42
              Quote: Unknown
              At the same time, we must not forget that certain circles in the United States were ready to make peace with the Nazis.

              German intelligence passed on to Hitler Roosevelt's plans to prepare for war with Germany in 1943. The Germans and Japanese were astonished by such alacrity and simply didn't believe the United States would be able to build powerful and combat-ready armies so quickly. Hitler feared an attack from the East during an invasion of England and a US counter-airborne assault on Great Britain when his Air Force had been weakened in the fighting over Great Britain. His successes in Europe were the result of the static nature of the Western Front when he was advancing in the East and the Eastern Front when he was advancing in the West. German forces were relentlessly pushed back as soon as the Allies in both the West and the East launched active offensives (El Alamein and the encirclement of the Germans at Stalingrad). After that, the Germans' counterattacks only managed to advance 50 kilometers (Kotelnikovo-Myshkova River, Kursk, Zhitomir, Balaton, Malmedy). The German counteroffensive on Kharkov was simply a stroke of luck, a response to Vatutin's overestimation of his capabilities.
  6. -4
    2 July 2026 07: 58
    The "Hitlerite European Union" grew noticeably stronger. The Nazis captured nine states: Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Denmark, Norway, Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, and the free city of Klaipėda (Memel). Controlled more than 100 million people.


    The trophies were colossal and made it possible to arm 30 to 40 divisions, hundreds of artillery, tank, security, reserve and garrison units and subdivisions. Thousands of French vehicles filled the critical shortage of equipment in German units.

    In fact, Germany has become stronger over the past year in 3 times. And Hitler barely even used France's vast military industry. This is the Germany the USSR faced instead of Germany in 39, as a result of... delaying the war since 39. Yes, they delayed it...

    The Germans lost the Battle of Britain and didn't find an antidote to the British Navy, so Sea Lion never happened.
    1. +4
      2 July 2026 08: 52
      Quote: Olgovich
      In fact, Germany had tripled in strength in just one year. And Hitler barely even tapped France's vast military industry. This was the Germany the USSR faced instead of Germany in 1939, as a result of... delaying the war since 1939. They delayed it, yes...

      Dear Olgovich, I gave you a plus for your wit! But, the truth is more expensive! stop In hindsight, we are all strategists! fellow Who could have guessed then (especially among politicians) that Germany will crush the Anglo-French forces that outnumber them And in terms of armaments in a matter of weeks!? Plus the Maginot Line! The Wehrmacht simply ruined all the politicians' calculations! negative
      1. +1
        3 July 2026 07: 32
        Quote: Proxima
        Who could have guessed then (especially among politicians) that Germany would crush the Anglo-French forces, which were superior in numbers and weapons?

        anyone who knew even a little bit history of WWI, when only Russia saved the Anglo-French troops, which were superior in numbers and weapons
  7. +4
    2 July 2026 08: 05
    The whole article can be summed up in one sentence: because there were no means to deliver troops and ammunition.
  8. -2
    2 July 2026 08: 24
    However, both sides soon changed priorities and began bombing cities. The Germans had already bombed a significant portion of the enemy's airfields, and then the Führer's order was to bomb the cities.
    This isn't the only oddity. One should recall Dunkirk, where the German advance was halted for three days, allowing the British time to evacuate to their island. Without this "gift" from Hitler, the British would have been left virtually without an army. Incidentally, Hitler himself was an Anglophile.
    The most important question is, who brought Hitler to power? Who began to transform Germany, defeated in World War I and bound by the restrictions of Versailles, into the Third Reich? It turned out that, instead of destroying Russia (as expected in the West), the Bolsheviks created a powerful socialist state, uncontrolled by the global ghouls. This required the creation of anti-communism in the Nazis and an anti-USSR in the Third Reich. The Anglo-Saxons were no strangers to raking in the heat of battle, pitting nations against each other, and dividing and conquering. Thus, the Germans were turned into cannon fodder. Ultimately, the United States became the global master of capitalism, putting the world on the dollar. However, they failed to achieve the same with the USSR; a global pole of power had emerged. The Soviet Union emerged not only victorious with global prestige, but ultimately became a nuclear and space superpower.
    Alas, what the Junkers couldn't do, the Snickers did. Khrushchev, by slandering Stalin, slandered socialism. Brezhnev, by agreeing to a moon landing with the US, squandered the unconditional victory of socialism in space and, on the back of momentary American handouts, created stagnation and a Western fetish. Gorbachev is already a consequence of the degradation of the CPSU, which was overrun by opportunistic careerists. Nevertheless, the All-Union referendum showed that the people did not reject socialism, voting to preserve the Soviet Union. So what did they get? Instead of the promised democracy, they got the predatory privatization of Chubais and a capitalism no one signed up for, and, instead of a renewed Union, a sham "CIS." This is a deception and a crime.
    "Sea Lion" was originally a cover for the main thing - the war with the USSR.
    1. +7
      2 July 2026 09: 00
      Quote: Per se.
      Brezhnev, by making a deal with the US on the Moon, squandered an unconditional victory...

      Per se, you don't seem to be a stupid person. request What did Brezhnev shit about? belay What the hell deal? recourse
      1. -4
        2 July 2026 10: 05
        Quote: Proxima
        Per se, you don't seem to be a stupid person.
        You, I suppose, aren't stupid either. Judge for yourself: why on earth did the Americans so love the USSR, the "defeated" one in the "space race," and make unprecedented concessions, even offering expensive gifts to dear Leonid Ilyich? Research the topic before passing judgment. Believe me, I did. The joint Apollo-Soyuz show, the détente, was the apotheosis. There was dirt on NASA, and Nixon personally visited Moscow. However, it's up to you what you believe, because NASA's manned flights in the last century, during the years of maximum solar activity, in an oxygen environment, in diapers, and reentering the Earth's atmosphere without braking, as we did (the two-dive scheme), and after all the g-forces, a Hollywood-style jump... You can only believe it (or make excuses for NASA). There's no need to talk about "conspiracy theories" here; that's the same as accusing atheists of conspiracy theories. All the best.
        1. +3
          2 July 2026 23: 17
          So, not only did the Americans never fly to the Moon, but they never launched anything at all except satellites and probes?
          And people flew exclusively on Soviet ships, and so that no one would be offended, the US secretly entered into an agreement with the USSR, according to which the Soviets sent their ships to the US, and the Americans allegedly assembled them themselves and flew them?

          Strongly, of course.
          1. -3
            3 July 2026 06: 22
            Quote: Russian_Ninja
            Strongly, of course.
            Rather, you're exaggerating. Before the shuttles, the Yankees, as it turns out, flew on the Jamini, and specifically with oxygen. These astral-nauts' real flights began after the Apollo-Soyuz missions, a release from the cold, and their introduction to our space medicine, which these diaper-wearers had no idea about. Mixing the reality of robotic flights with Hollywood and copy-pasted versions of our omissions about real human flight—that's "too much, of course," for the States, with all the money and PR that still makes many swoon over the bombastic, ""That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind"That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." The only thing is, the United States is not all of humanity, and certainly not the best part of it.
    2. +3
      2 July 2026 10: 28
      Quote: Per se.
      This isn't the only oddity. One should remember Dunkirk, where the German advance was halted for three days,

      There was a vulgar nuance: a lack of fuel and spare parts for the disabled tanks. They were physically no longer able to advance, which is why a "stop order" was issued.

      Quote: Per se.
      There's no need to talk about "conspiracy theories" here; it's the same as accusing atheists of conspiracy theories.
      Hmm, so only Christians or Muslims can participate in conspiracy theories? But atheists can't?
      Won ....
      I've never believed in God, but I can believe in conspiracy theories...
      1. -1
        2 July 2026 11: 57
        The German advance was halted for seven days until all the British and their allies had departed for Britain.
        1. +2
          2 July 2026 12: 45
          Quote: pavel.tipin
          The German advance was halted for seven days until all the British and their allies had departed for Britain.

          And do the fuel and spare parts run around the fields themselves, or do they have to be delivered from Germany?
          You are on the map delivery distance Think about it first....
          1. 0
            3 July 2026 10: 51
            Where were the German air forces at that moment? Did they also receive a stop order, or did they not have bombs or gasoline?
            1. +2
              3 July 2026 11: 17
              Quote: pavel.tipin
              Where were the German air forces at that moment? Did they also receive a stop order, or did they not have bombs or gasoline?

              And the German air force couldn't do it either - although Goering kicked himself (including for the same reasons - cartridges, bombs and aviation fuel are not lying around on the road).
              They sent one infantry unit - it lost momentum.
              And after 2 days the British had already recovered and began to take up defensive positions.
              Quote: Alexey RA
              I already wrote that the stop order was given by von Rundstedt and was already being carried out before the Führer signed it.
      2. -2
        2 July 2026 12: 18
        Quote: your1970
        hmm, so only Christians or Islam can participate in conspiracy theories?
        I'm not surprised by such a somersault. You know how to put in your two cents... You don't believe in God, but you believe in NASA? Their flights are triumphant, a miracle of God, so they must believe in God too. There are more arguments for God's existence than real proof that the Yankees were on the Moon. All this "conspiracy theory" is something convenient to hide, ridiculing accusations and questions.
        As for Dunkirk, I don’t think Halder knew less about the situation than you did when he expressed his bewilderment at this stop order in his War Diary.
        1. +8
          2 July 2026 13: 07
          Quote: Per se.
          I'm not surprised by such a somersault. You know how to put in your two cents... You don't believe in God, but you do believe in NASA? Their flights are triumphant, a miracle of God, so they must believe in God too. There are more arguments for God's existence than real proof that the Yankees were on the Moon.

          The problem is that on one side of the scale there is the Flight to the Moon, and on the other side there is faith in the USSR.
          If the USSR tells the truth and the flight was - that is, there is reason to trust the leadership of the USSR
          If there was no flight and the USSR liedAnd Brezhnev sold out for a car - how are they different from Gorbachev? Nothing!
          So you decide - you Sovietophile or Sovietophobe?
          It looks different idiotism- when Sovietophiles deny NASA's flight to the Moon.

          Quote: Per se.
          As for Dunkirk, I don’t think Halder knew less about the situation than you did when he expressed his bewilderment at this stop order in his War Diary.
          - article about it.
          https://topwar.ru/171760-stop-prikaz-gitlera-pochemu-nemeckie-tanki-ne-razdavili-britanskuju-armiju.html?ysclid=mr3cdtnspf699748094
          1. -3
            2 July 2026 13: 48
            Quote: your1970
            So, decide for yourself - are you a Sovietophile or a Sovietophobe?
            Neither Brezhnev nor Gorbachev exemplify the corruption of socialism itself. There was also Khrushchev, to whom, incidentally, Kennedy twice approached with the proposal of a joint mission to the moon. This despite his own stated ambitions to beat the USSR in the lunar race! Khrushchev refused, knowing full well of their struggles with suborbital hops on the Jamini rocket, the problems with the heavy rocket, which is precisely why the Yankees used oxygen to save weight. It's even stranger that, having supposedly created the miracle Saturn V rocket and the miracle F-1 engines, they never switched from dangerous oxygen to air, as we did.
            It's idiotic how, having screwed up once in a fairy tale, they then start to wriggle out of it. Had the USSR not recognized the American manned mission, had it not confirmed it, even without accusations, the United States would have been unable to prove its manned achievements. Only the USSR's prestige, especially the anointing of the Apollo-Soyuz show, allowed the United States to emerge triumphant. And yet, it was a matter of life and death for capitalism. Incidentally, Kennedy's death, before his possible public disclosure of the unacceptability of the planned Moon landing scam, is also a possible pretext for his assassination. Incidentally, von Braun died immediately after the completion of the Apollo missions, as did Kubrick, who dared to talk about filming the flights on Hollywood soundstages.
            Sovietophile, Sovietophobe... Rather, you are the Sovietophobe, and I am the Sovietophile, if you like.
            Regarding the stop order, let these be our personal opinions.
            1. +4
              2 July 2026 14: 36
              Quote: Per se.
              and I Sovietophileif you like.
              then you have no right to deny NASA's flight to the moon - otherwise Brezhnev sold out.And believe in the country and the system that it has corrupt The management is stupid, to say the least. They sold out once, but they could have sold out a hundred times over.
              So what is it You're a Sovietophobe, and I'm a Sovietophile. In this matter: the USSR confirmed NASA's flights to the Moon and that's enough for me.

              Quote: Per se.
              Ah, it was a matter of life and death for capitalism.
              For the USSR, space was a matter of life or death, but for capitalism, it was one of a thousand paths to development.
              1. -3
                3 July 2026 07: 02
                Quote: your1970
                then you have no right to deny NASA's flight to the Moon - otherwise Brezhnev has sold out.
                Don't distort the facts, no one sold out. Comrade Brezhnev simply wanted to screw the Americans, thinking it was profitable. In reality, Leonid Ilyich turned out to be that naive Indian who traded pure gold for a mirror and glass beads. It was a matter of life and death for two systems, their global prestige, and capitalism was losing. Thanks to Brezhnev, he saved the US from disgrace and reaped political and other "dividends" from détente.
                1. +3
                  3 July 2026 07: 51
                  Quote: Per se.
                  In fact, Leonid Ilyich turned out to be that naive Indian who was in favor of a mirror and glass beads gave pure gold.

                  That is sold out to the enemies - You yourself, describing it in different ways, understand this.
                  Quote: Per se.
                  Comrade Brezhnev simply wanted to screw the Americans.

                  - if he wanted FUCK THE AMERICANS - materials about the non-flight would have been dumped in the UN.
                  And he - in your version - wanted FUCK THEM (,
                  Quote: Per se.
                  Thanks to Brezhnev, he saved the US from shame, got political and other benefits
                  )
                  i.e sold outAnd it doesn't matter that he only got a car for himself - he could have dealt a very powerful blow TO THE ENEMY, and he saved their reputation
                  I repeat - the choice is not rich -
                  Quote: your1970
                  So it's you Sovietophobe - and I Sovietophile In this matter: the USSR confirmed NASA's flights to the Moon and that's enough for me.
                  1. -1
                    3 July 2026 08: 28
                    Quote: your1970
                    - if he wanted to FUCK THE AMERICANS, the materials about the non-flight would have been dumped in the UN.
                    You're surprised by the materials at the UN? Everything's classified, since we even got involved in the Apollo-Soyuz show. Mr. Leonov was even a staunch advocate of America's triumph.
                    Don't worry, sooner or later, you can't hide an awl in a sack; if the public was deceived, the USSR is no more anyway, and the United States, despite this disgrace, still has everything ahead of them.
                    You can believe in God, in the triumphant US lunar missions, in whatever you want, it’s a personal matter, no one is encroaching on it.
                    1. +2
                      3 July 2026 08: 46
                      Quote: Per se.
                      Everything is classified, since we even got involved in the Soyuz-Apollo show.
                      if we are on the side ENEMY something
                      Quote: your1970
                      That is sold out enemies - you yourself, describing it in different ways, understand this.


                      Quote: Per se.
                      it's a personal matter

                      It is a NOT A personal matter is a political issue. If he sold out once, it could have been 2, 3, 5...10...100.
                      For example, no one can explain why they went into Afghanistan - if Amin is our protégé, the army is so against it that it refused to sign the plan, Brezhnev is against it, the KGB is against it, and only intelligence is for it?
                      What was it that was in Amin's Palace that they rushed to storm it first, knowing that Amin had already been poisoned?

                      Therefore, I repeat - you are making a decision - a Sovietophile with knowledge of the venality of the USSR leadership - sounds at the very least strange.
                      1. 0
                        3 July 2026 08: 59
                        Quote: your1970
                        What was it that was in Amin's Palace that they rushed to storm it first, knowing that Amin had already been poisoned?
                        Amin was saved from poisoning by our doctors, who did not know that they had decided to eliminate him in this way.
                        The idea of ​​the USSR's leadership being corrupt is nonsense, I apologize. It was a mistake, shortsighted, yes, but not treason. You'd better explain, on behalf of your bourgeois and renegades, "who's who" in the current situation.
                      2. +1
                        3 July 2026 09: 44
                        Quote: Per se.
                        Regarding the corruption of the USSR leadership, that's nonsense, I'm sorry.

                        Then don't be delusional - this is you write
                        Quote: Per se.
                        a naive Indian who gave pure gold for a mirror and glass beads

                        Quote: Per se.
                        personally expensive gifts to dear Leonid Ilyich?

                        Once again - when the leader of the country instead OBVIOUS hitting TO THE ENEMY countries for gifts from the ENEMY starts to be his doormat - this is Corruption.
                        Even if they didn't give him a cent of money.
                        It's time to understand the obvious: either the US flew and Brezhnev confirmed the fact, or the US didn't fly, and then Brezhnev sold out.
                        And Brezhnev and the FRG (NATO) rushed to gasify (to make it easier to make Leopards against the USSR) - instead of their own citizens - too
                        Quote: Per se.
                        Error, shortsightedness,
                        ????? belay belay
                        Isn't there an overabundance of mistakes - did it fall under the USA, did it fall under Germany?

                        Quote: Per se.
                        You'd better explain to your bourgeois and renegades, "who is who" in the current situation.
                        if Brezhnev is socialism sold out to the US - that's the current one capitalism God himself commanded us to be corrupt.


                        Quote: Per se.
                        Amin was saved from poisoning by our doctors, who did not know that they had decided to eliminate him in this way.

                        No one could have known that he would be saved at the last moment - that's why the Palace was stormed knowingly knowing that Amin is not there and he is dead. Why?
                        What did intelligence need to pick up in the palace - that they invaded a friendly country with their loyal protégé for this?
                      3. -1
                        3 July 2026 10: 17
                        Sergey, you're a hopeless anti-Soviet... You should be scrutinizing the current situation in Russia, but no, judging by this, you're one of them. Probably, if the Reds return, you'll be bashing Chubais and his friends. Let's leave it at that, all the best.
                      4. +1
                        3 July 2026 10: 50
                        Quote: Per se.
                        Sergey, you are a hopeless anti-Soviet.

                        I'm hopeless Sovietophile - I believe Brezhnev with his confirmation of US flights, and I don’t come up with extremely stupid excuses for the head of state, like you.
                        Either you believe Brezhnev, or you don’t, and then you’re anti-Soviet. IN ESSENCE despite all your "yes, everything was good in the USSR, but now everything is bad."

                        Quote: Per se.
                        scrupulously sanded

                        I'm incredibly annoyed by the double standards and the way they try to fit an owl onto a globe - what they do pseudo-Sovietophiles like you (those who believe in the USSR - and absolutely (Those who don't trust the leader of the USSR). If this doesn't reach you, alas, I am powerless....

                        Quote: Per se.
                        Probably if the reds come back,
                        -alas, they won't come back.
                        They have nothing to promise that will make people go bare-chested against bayonets and smash the heads of bourgeois babies against the corner of the stove.
                        "Impale Chubais" - that's enough of an idea for a day, nothing more.
          2. +1
            6 July 2026 13: 56
            Quote: your1970
            If the flight never happened, and the USSR lied, and Brezhnev sold out for a car, then how are they any different from Gorbachev? Nothing!

            During Korolev's lifetime, all lunar flights ended in complete disaster. S.P. Korolev simply miscalculated the thermal conditions of the spacecraft's electrical equipment for the duration of the lunar flight. The electrical systems overheated and burned out during lunar flights. Later, space travel also encountered bottlenecks. The collapse of the USSR and the lag in aviation since the Bekaa Valley War were partly due to the fact that the production and development of aircraft adhesives was reliant on three elderly women. If Andropov and Brezhnev had given them higher salaries and sent graduate students from Moscow State University, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, and Moscow Aviation Institute (MAI) to their labs for good wages, instead of purchasing an expensive grinding machine from Belgium with one set of tools capable of producing only enough ground protective tiles for one Buran flight, what a difference it would have made. The Soviet economy could have withstood investments in a chemical glue laboratory and a machine-tool workshop, but it broke down when it came to financing machine-tool manufacturing in Belgium.
    3. +4
      2 July 2026 14: 47
      Quote: Per se.
      One should have remembered Dunkirk, where the German advance was halted for three days, allowing the British time to evacuate to their island. Without such a "gift" from Hitler, England would have been left virtually without an army.

      I already wrote that the stop order was given by von Rundstedt and was already being carried out before the Führer signed it.
      Quote: Per se.
      The most important question is, who brought Hitler to power? Who began to transform Germany, defeated in World War I and bound by the restrictions of Versailles, into the Third Reich? It turned out that, instead of destroying Russia (as expected in the West), the Bolsheviks created a powerful socialist state, uncontrolled by the global ghouls. This required creating anti-communism in the Nazis and an anti-USSR in the Third Reich.

      When Hitler came to power, the USSR's most formidable enemy was a coalition of Finland, Poland, and Romania. And if Japan had joined in, the USSR would have lost.
      The Reich was not rebuilt against the USSR. Some needed a counterweight to France, since after Versailles, the foundation of their foreign policy—the system of checks and balances in Europe—had collapsed. And others... others disliked the results of Versailles, in which they, having effectively saved the Entente, were left with only scraps. Plus, they deeply disliked the protectionism of the colonial system, which blocked access to rich markets—this system needed to be destroyed.
      So for the other participants in the Reich's revival, the USSR was completely irrelevant. They needed the collapse of the colonial system and Europe's dependence on them.
    4. +1
      2 July 2026 17: 33
      Are you saying that the Germans allowed the British and other troops to be evacuated from the mainland to the island without hindrance? You are deeply mistaken, my dear fellow.
      During the evacuation, the Luftwaffe literally hung over the bridgehead and the strait.
      1. -2
        3 July 2026 06: 55
        Quote: Grencer81
        During the evacuation, the Luftwaffe literally hung over the bridgehead and the strait.
        You want them to be seen off with flowers? How can you explain the conspiracy to the Germans back then? Many firmly believed that there was a war going on, both the Messerschmitt pilots and the Hurricane pilots. But for some, war is a nightmare, for others, nothing changes. Some die for their beliefs, their country, while others make millions and billions. For the US, this war was a godsend. They emerged from the crisis and the Great Depression, enslaved Europe and, essentially, the entire non-socialist world.
        1. +2
          3 July 2026 11: 26
          Well, there's no need to tell grandma's gossip about some kind of "conspiracy".
          1. 0
            3 July 2026 13: 17
            Quote: Grencer81
            tell grandma's gossip
            I didn't listen to grandma's gossip. There's a famous saying: "The lords fight, but the serfs' forelocks crack." You apparently haven't wondered why Hitler didn't swallow up Switzerland, with all its banks, gold, and currency from all over the world. You know better about "grandma's gossip." It's your business.
            1. +1
              3 July 2026 16: 49
              I'll repeat myself once again: only the least intelligent person would believe in any kind of "conspiracies," especially after Churchill's rise to power...
              1. -1
                6 July 2026 06: 46
                Quote: Grencer81
                I will repeat myself once again, in some kind of “conspiracies”, especially after the arrival
                So little has changed. Conspiracy, or not, brought Hitler to power, allowed Germany to violate the Versailles Treaty, and absorb many European countries to achieve its desired potential. Now, anti-Russia Ukraine has been whining for eight years, despite holding all the cards in its hands in 2014, as Mr. Burkhalter clearly explained during his visit who monitors all accounts, even offshore ones.
                There is no habit or desire to judge someone as smart or not smart. I hope you will figure it all out yourself, sooner or later.
  9. +2
    2 July 2026 09: 29
    He and his generals weren't afflicted with Altheimer's idiocy and understood that without isolating the islands from the outside world, an invasion would be disastrous. Canaris had a far more compelling view of the situation in the east: defeating the Red Army would increase his military and economic potential, allowing him to compete on equal terms with Great Britain and its allies, including the United States. But it didn't work out—the Red Army isn't a tricolor, and Putin isn't Stalin.
    1. +2
      2 July 2026 10: 36
      Quote: Jacques Sekavar
      Canaris presented the situation in the east much more attractively, since by defeating the Red Army he would increase military and economic potential,

      Yeah, but here's the rub: the generals fought against Russia in WWI and knew the climate, the lack of roads, and all the other delights of Russia very well. And yet they drew it. absurd line "A-A" - which left the war in suspended condition.
      What for ANY generals - nonsense

      Quote: Jacques Sekavar
      allowed on equal terms lol
      - that's why several Wehrmacht generals for myself They decided that the war in the East was lost already in September - when the Allied aid was still as far away as China, and Speer noted this in his diary 4 ( !!!!!) day of the war.
      And the USA hasn’t really gotten involved yet
      1. +3
        2 July 2026 14: 50
        Quote: your1970
        Yeah, but here's the rub: the generals had fought Russia in WWI and were perfectly familiar with the climate, the lack of roads, and all the other delights of Russia. And yet, they drew up the absurd "A-A" line, which left the war in limbo.
        Which is nonsense for ANY general

        ICHH, even such a plan seemed more feasible for the OKH and OKW than a landing on the Island - after the first studies of the "Sea Lion". laughing
        It was no wonder that all branches of the armed forces rushed with such enthusiasm to plan a ground campaign against the USSR - even taking into account a war on two fronts and the gigantic Soviet territories.
  10. + 12
    2 July 2026 10: 11
    The quality of historical articles on the site has dropped significantly. First, there was a series of articles about the excessive number of tanks in the USSR before WWII, then this opus.
    Hitler did not carry out Operation Sea Lion for three simple reasons:
    1. Air superiority has not been achieved.
    2. Naval dominance has not been achieved.
    3. There are not enough floating craft for a mass landing of troops. (The same Siebel, ersatz landing craft, were created specifically for the "Sea Lion"
    Accordingly, taking all these factors into account, the operation was abandoned. All the author's other empty rhetoric about the global conspiracy and so on is just empty talk.
    1. -1
      2 July 2026 13: 12
      Quote: Egor Kutuzov
      Hitler did not carry out Operation Sea Lion for three simple reasons.
      It was not for this that Hitler was allowed to swallow up Austria, Czechoslovakia was given away, and then the "Phoney War" was waged, where ultimately the Third Reich acquired the necessary potential for a war with the USSR, so that Hitler could land in England.
      Air supremacy. Had the Luftwaffe not stopped destroying British industry by turning its attention to cities, little would have remained of the British air force. Moreover, the Germans had 4074 aircraft to the British's 1963; someone even there needed some kind of "Air Defense Force" to keep Britain standing.
      Naval supremacy. As Operation Cerberus demonstrated, the Germans were quite capable of getting three large ships through the English Channel (the battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, and the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen). Had they wanted to, they could have blocked the straits with aircraft, coastal batteries, and mines.
      Not enough watercraft... Their watercraft are off the coast for the invasion of England, the diametrically opposed German troops at our borders "for rest." The point is, "Sea Lion" was for Comrade Stalin, who believed it wholeheartedly. After "Barbarossa" began, the screen was no longer necessary.
      1. +3
        2 July 2026 15: 04
        Quote: Per se.
        Naval supremacy. As Operation Cerberus demonstrated, the Germans were quite capable of getting three large ships through the English Channel (the battleships Scharnhorst, Gneisenau, and the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen).

        Just look at what Britain had in the Channel at that time. If I remember correctly, they only had one squadron of torpedo bombers, a "string bag" squadron.
        After Operation Sea Lion was cancelled, the Channel's defenses were scattered across various theaters of operations, and combat readiness was significantly reduced, given the lack of a threat of an airborne assault. Preparing for an airborne assault is a much larger and more time-consuming process than preparing for a breakthrough, so the Limeys had time to increase their forces and improve their combat readiness to repel an airborne assault.
        And yes, as Operation Cerberus demonstrated, even if the enemy was completely relaxed, passage through the Channel would result in damage to two battleships for the Kriegsmarine. Moreover, the Gnaeus was so severely damaged that, instead of being restored to combat readiness, it was sent for major repairs and modernization, where it happily perished, scuttled in Gdynia as Soviet troops approached.
        1. 0
          3 July 2026 06: 46
          Quote: Alexey RA
          But preparation for the landing is a much larger and longer-term process.
          Dear Alexey, I have already said that no one was really preparing for the landing in Britain; it was a cover for Operation Barbarossa, and it worked.
          In 1940, when the Germans really wanted a landing, and a landing by sea, there was the "Weserübung" (Weser Exercise), the Germans captured Norway and Denmark. The British fleet didn't have time to do anything. Perhaps this was the plan, if Hitler was being given the necessary potential in Europe for the war with the USSR.
          If Hitler had had real plans to land in Britain, it would have happened, especially if the British Expeditionary Force had not escaped from Dunkirk.
          1. +2
            3 July 2026 11: 55
            Quote: Per se.
            In 1940, when the Germans really wanted to land, and land by sea, there was the "Weserübung" (Weser Exercise), the Germans captured Norway and Denmark. The British fleet had no time to do anything.

            Heh-heh-heh... do you remember why? Because the Germans were a day ahead of the British landing in Norway. Those same British cruisers couldn't put to sea because they had to unload the troops first. Yes, the Limeys planned to transport and land the first echelon on warships—like ours in Feodosia or near Odessa.
            The naval battles at the beginning of Weserübung were clashes between German landing cover groups and British minelaying cover groups in Norwegian waters.
            Plus, the Limeys are much further from Norway than from the Channel.
            Quote: Per se.
            If Hitler had had real plans to land in Britain, it would have happened, especially if the British Expeditionary Force had not escaped from Dunkirk.

            A landing without a fleet could only be at the bottom of the Channel. And the Germans had no fleet after Norway.
            Quote: Alexey RA
            LK Scharnhorst - 08.06.1940/1940/XNUMX in a battle with the Glories group received a torpedo in the stern from the Akasta EM. Renovated until December XNUMX
            LK "Gneisenau" - 20.06.1940/1940/XNUMX received a torpedo in the bow end from the submarine "Clyde". Renovated until November XNUMX
            BR "Lyuttsov" - 09.04.1940/11.04.1940/1940 was damaged during a breakthrough in Oslo (the bow BSh GK was disabled), 1940/XNUMX/XNUMX received a torpedo in the stern from the submarine "Spearfish". Under repair until August XNUMX, combat readiness only in December XNUMX
            BR "Admiral Scheer" - in June 1940, combat readiness.
            SRT "Admiral Hipper" - in June 1940, combat readiness.
            KRT "Prince Eugen" - was accepted into the fleet only on 01.08.1940/1940/1941, and immediately got up for additional equipment. Combat training - from December XNUMX Conditionally combat readiness only in April XNUMX
            KRL "Cologne" - in June 1940, combat readiness.
            KRL "Leipzig" - 13.12.1939/1940/XNUMX received a torpedo from the submarine "Salmon". In repair until December XNUMX, not fully restored, was used as a training CD.
            The cruiser Nuremberg was hit by a torpedo from the submarine Salmon on December 13, 1939 (the submarine commander chased two hares and wounded both). Ready for action by June 1940.
            KRL "Emden" - in June 1940, combat readiness.
            According to EM: as of June 1940, 6 EMs are ready, 4 more are in need of immediate repair.
            According to MM: as of June 1940, 17 MM were ready.

            In total, Kriegsmarine for June-November 1940 has 1 BR, 1 SRT, 2 KRL, 6-10 EM and 17 MM. With these forces, the Germans will have to defend the landing zone and fight with the fleet of the Metropolis.

            For comparison: in mid-1940, the Limeys had 1 battleship, 3-4 cruisers, and 40-50 destroyers and mm based in the southern ports of the Island alone.
      2. +1
        2 July 2026 18: 27
        To achieve air superiority, fighters, fighters, and more fighters were needed first and foremost, which could cover the landing force itself and then supply this landing force with everything it needed.
        Which is what the Allies themselves demonstrated on June 6, 1944.
  11. +3
    2 July 2026 13: 37
    Over the course of a month of fighting, British fighter aircraft lost over 450 aircraft and a quarter of their pilots. German losses were somewhat lower. This means that Germany could have crushed the British Air Force and achieved air superiority.

    This is, frankly, a highly dubious conclusion. Higher British loss figures, as far as I recall, only occurred at the very beginning of the Battle of Britain, and they didn't maintain a consistent trend. After all, German pilots were no less exhausted than their British counterparts. Moreover, every lost German aircraft and downed pilot was irretrievably lost to the Reich, even if the pilot survived. But not every British aircraft shot down and counted as a Luftwaffe ace lost its pilot, if only because the pilot would eventually bail out over friendly territory and, if necessary, crash-land the aircraft there, which could sometimes still be quickly returned to service.
    The performance characteristics of German fighters, whatever may be said about them, did not give them an indisputable advantage in aerial combat over British aircraft. The skill of German aces was gradually declining as their best fighters were steadily being eliminated, albeit bit by bit, in the skies over the English Channel. The pace of replenishing the RAF with new aircraft to replace those lost, including through overseas deliveries, clearly exceeded the capabilities of Hitler's military-industrial complex. So Göring essentially had no prospects; God was still "on the side of the big battalions."
    So the statement that “Germany could have crushed the British Air Force and gained air superiority” seems to me rather frivolous and far removed from reality.
  12. +4
    2 July 2026 13: 45
    At the same time, Canaris supplied Hitler with disinformation about the Soviet Union and its defensive capabilities. The Russians' defensive potential was greatly underestimated!

    Why does the author assume that Canaris was spreading disinformation, that is, deliberately understating the figures reported to the Führer, knowing the true state of affairs regarding the state of the USSR's defense industry? Perhaps the matter is much simpler, and simply lies in the fact that the Abwehr, so to speak, screwed up? True, then reality no longer fits into the author's worldview, but so much the worse for reality. smile
    1. +5
      2 July 2026 15: 08
      Quote: Bogalex
      Perhaps the matter is much simpler and simply lies in the fact that the Abwehr, so to speak, screwed up?

      Apparently, the Abwehr had problems operating deep within the USSR. If I remember correctly, the advance of the second echelon from the internal districts was never discovered.
      But the Abwehr was doing a good job in the border region. The Germans already had data on the new KA medium and heavy tanks in the spring of 1941.
      1. 0
        2 July 2026 18: 29
        After all, there were new lands and new people in the borderlands, and it took a long time to figure out who among these people was who, and there was no time for that.
  13. +5
    2 July 2026 13: 58
    Representatives of the army, navy and air force could not find a common language.

    Naturally they couldn't.
    Under the best of circumstances, the navy could only cover the landings on a narrow front. To which the army responded that they might as well put the landings through a meat grinder.
    The army demanded a landing on a broad front. The navy countered that in that case, the landing force would have to land on the seabed.

    In general, both the army and navy were inclined to believe that a landing was impossible with the available forces, and so they planned the operation rather halfheartedly. And when the Führer declared the USSR England's only hope, all branches of the armed forces breathed a sigh of relief. Because even planning a war with Russia seemed more realistic than Operation Sea Lion.
  14. +3
    2 July 2026 15: 00
    The author definitely exaggerated about the "mountains of weapons" that the US sent to England in the summer of 1940. 200 artillery pieces and some small arms—that's not mountains, that's just a bunch.
  15. -4
    2 July 2026 15: 17
    Hitler was a half-Jew and, like many Jews, an Anglophile. Hence his desire to "reach an agreement" with England and present a united front against communism. Hess's flight was a desperate attempt. But Churchill, to his credit, did not lose heart, despite the threatening military situation. As a result, Hitler missed a real opportunity to occupy England. German pilots were head and shoulders above their British counterparts and two heads and shoulders above their Soviet counterparts. But their weakness was the short range of their fighters. A landing operation would have forced the British air force into combat, in which it would have been destroyed.
  16. +1
    2 July 2026 18: 09
    The British also managed to steal a German cipher machine and create a decryption device. They gained the unique ability to read encrypted German radiograms, orders, reports, and other documents. This system, dubbed "Ultra," was kept top secret.

    If the article is talking about 1940 and the German Nazis' planning of an invasion of England, then, if I'm not mistaken, Enigma, thanks to the Royal Navy, was obtained in May 1941, deciphered six months later, and then they were able to read the ciphers; at that time, the Germans were already at war with the Soviet Union.
    Then, the British ran into trouble again, and the Germans improved the machine. Chance came to the rescue again: in the fall of 1942, they captured another wrecked German submarine...
  17. -1
    3 July 2026 17: 42
    The most obvious answer: he didn’t want to!
    Why?
    And their own, in the spirit of racial superiority, contempt for all others, and cruel rationality.
    I would like to be friends.
    After all, it wasn't Germany that declared war on Great Britain, but the other way around, which even came as a somewhat unexpected decision to Hitler - most likely, he had been promised neutrality by someone very influential.
    However, the late Hess and the Nazi-giving royal family know this better.
    And this was quite common in Britain: promising one thing and doing something completely different, if not the opposite.
    There was an article here recently about Denmark being deceived in this way, but an even more convincing example is how Nicholas I was deceived during his visit before the Crimean War.
  18. -1
    10 July 2026 02: 23
    Why did you refuse, but you don’t have the guts!