A "shotgun vs. drone" active defense system was demonstrated at Eurosatory 2026.

5 692 24
A "shotgun vs. drone" active defense system was demonstrated at Eurosatory 2026.

At the current Eurosatory 2026 arms exhibition, a very interesting active protection system (APS) was presented drones for military vehicles. Unlike existing systems of this class, it is designed in a "cheap and cheerful" format and does not contain any complex components.

It lacks radar systems and expensive electro-optical sensors for detecting dangerous targets. Instead of specialized counter-munitions for destroying drones, it uses 12-gauge shotgun shells, and its lightweight and modular design allows it to be mounted on more than just a single vehicle. танк or an infantry fighting vehicle, but also on some kind of pickup truck or armored car.



We are talking about the SCILT (Close Range Active C-UAV System) complex, developed by the German company Mehler Protection.

appointment


First, it's worth noting one important thing: there's no need to compare SCILT to the active protection systems we're used to. It's simply not suitable for countering anything other than drones. It's not like Arena-M or Trophy—it's designed to hit guided anti-tank missiles. rockets and this German product cannot be used for grenades.

Essentially, this is a completely niche system, adapted exclusively for combating plastic "buzzers" with grenades on board. This is its main drawback, but there are many advantages.

The complete SCILT system weighs no more than 300 kilograms and consumes relatively little power from the vehicle's electrical system. This means it can be installed on vehicles that are not suitable for a full-fledged APS, such as infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers, armored cars, and civilian vehicles used in combat situations.

SCILT modules are completely autonomous—they have their own optical-electronic threat detection systems, so they don't require any radars. Remarkably, SCILT modules can be connected to existing radars and other sensors on the vehicle. In other words, SCILT can complement a tank's existing active protection system and act as a last line of defense against drone attacks.

In general, this is both an independent and a supplementary protection product.

Устройство


The SCILT architecture is built around a set of modular units, referred to in official documentation as effector modules, which are placed at key points on the vehicle's hull and turret, forming a 360-degree protection system. Each module combines detection systems (or an interface to remote sensors such as a radar) and the ammunition tubes themselves, forming a single reconnaissance and strike element.

The modules are mounted around the vehicle's perimeter with overlapping engagement sectors. This configuration eliminates horizontal blind spots while simultaneously covering a significant portion of the upper hemisphere, particularly at low and medium angles of attack, typical for FPV drones targeting the turret roof or rear.

Each SCILT module is equipped with a small unit containing two cameras positioned side-by-side. These two cameras are used to determine the range to a target by combining images, thereby implementing the stereoscopic distance measurement principle. This approach eliminates the need for a separate laser rangefinder and open radar, reducing the system's cost and visibility, and simplifying its operation.


A fundamentally distinctive feature of SCILT is the choice of means of destruction: instead of specially developed counter-munitions, the system uses standard 12-gauge ammunition, that is, cartridges widely used in civilian and service weapons shotguns.

Each module is equipped with multiple barrels, each loaded with a single 12-gauge round. The land-based version (the SCILT can also be installed on various ships and boats) requires either modular replacement of the barrels after the ammunition has been expended, or manual reloading by the crew outside of direct contact with the enemy.

The effective interception range for SCILT is estimated in publications to be up to 75 meters, which is within the practical capabilities of a shotgun against small targets with precise target acquisition and an electronic guidance system. This is sufficient to destroy a drone before it collides with a vehicle, while maintaining a small firing zone, which is important for the safety of friendly forces.

Operating principle


SCILT's operation can be divided into three sequential steps: an initial signal about the presence of a potential target in a dangerous zone, a signal about the approaching threat, and finally, the so-called "trigger alert," that is, a notification that the drone has entered the guaranteed kill zone and the system is ready for interception.

First, SCILT, using data from its own optical sensors or external detection systems, detects the appearance of a small object in a designated sector. Image processing algorithms and (if available) radar data classify the object as a potential UAV, after which the system initiates tracking. At this stage, the crew receives notification of a threat, but does not fire until the trajectory parameters and the severity of the threat are confirmed.


Second, as the target approaches, SCILT refines the drone's range and speed, refines the attack direction, and calculates a possible interception point. The crew receives an "approach alert," allowing them to prepare for a possible maneuver, cover, or other measures while the system is operating. Meanwhile, SCILT cameras continue to track the target's movement, accounting for its maneuvers and possible evasive attempts.

Third and final: when the drone enters the effective range and engagement arc of the corresponding module, the system issues a "trigger alert" command. If "semi-manual" mode is enabled, SCILT awaits a command from the operator inside the vehicle: either confirmation to open fire or a prohibition if the target is identified as friendly or a decoy.


Upon the operator's "fire" command (or when the system is triggered automatically), one or more of the module's barrels fire at a calculated target, creating a pellet cloud along the drone's trajectory. If necessary, multiple modules can be sequentially aimed at a target to increase the likelihood of interception, especially in swarming attacks.

Conclusions


Of course, this is far from the first system of this type to be offered on the market. However, it is one of the few that has been manufactured in metal and even tested. The manufacturer claims to have completed 48 test cycles, including ballistic tests, reliability checks, operation in extreme temperatures, and an assessment of the lethality density.

It's too early to say whether any countries will purchase it en masse. However, the system's low-cost nature, based on standard 12-gauge ammunition and readily available optical sensors, makes SCILT potentially suitable for equipping a wide range of platforms—from pickup trucks to tanks and ships.

This is especially relevant in conditions where the volume and intensity of the threat posed by small UAVs is so great that single, expensive solutions are unable to meet the needs of the troops.

So, as they say, we will see.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    26 June 2026 05: 09
    Image processing algorithms and (if available) radar data allow the object to be classified as a potential UAV,

    This is the most interesting part...will the system be able to distinguish a flock of pigeons from a squadron of UAVs?
    1. +1
      26 June 2026 08: 40
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      This is the most interesting part...will the system be able to distinguish a flock of pigeons from a squadron of UAVs?

      To hell with them, with the pigeons. wassat
      Simple but tasteful, that's how it should be done!
  2. 0
    26 June 2026 06: 42
    I wonder if we're planning something similar? It's time to not only demonstrate it, but also implement it immediately.
    1. +1
      26 June 2026 21: 05
      Back in 2019, MAI students created a drone fighter armed with a 12-gauge Vepr carbine. The design won prizes at exhibitions, but when it was offered to the Ministry of Defense, they refused. Since the time of Hero of Russia Serdyukov, the Ministry of Defense has had its own "system" of awarding contracts only to "insiders," those who can afford kickbacks. And what can ordinary, albeit intelligent, students possibly do to fill the pockets of generals? General Krivoruchko, who oversees new weapons development at the Ministry of Defense, bought himself a modest 220-square-meter den in Miami, USA. In case anyone has forgotten, Miami is in California, the most expensive state in the US. He even sent his wife to the US twice to give birth—so that the children would immediately acquire US citizenship! Now imagine how much a poor general would need to maintain a kennel in Miami and his wife and children in that same 220-meter kennel? You won't get rich from student activities here...
      1. 0
        26 June 2026 21: 40
        Miami is Florida, and not the most expensive state in the US. I'd say it's "average" in price.
      2. ANB
        0
        27 June 2026 00: 59
        Miami is in California,

        Miami is Florida. It seems more expensive than California.
  3. +1
    26 June 2026 06: 55
    Quote: The same Lech

    This is the most interesting part...will the system be able to distinguish a flock of pigeons from a squadron of UAVs?


    Another interesting point, a quote from the article:
    fire a shot at a calculated point, creating a cloud of pellets along the drone's trajectory

    What if there is a swarm of drones on a cloud of pellets?
    They approach the target several at a time, at intervals.
    So I understand that the system is recharged manually...

    In that case, I’d rather meet a bear with a break-open, single-barrel shotgun than sit in a box like that.
    1. +3
      26 June 2026 07: 57
      Quote: Lynx2000
      What if there is a swarm of drones on a cloud of pellets?

      In this case, the system will not save you.
      A bulletproof vest also can't withstand the entire magazine, but that doesn't mean it's pointless. hi
      There is no such thing as an absolute shield.
  4. 0
    26 June 2026 08: 40
    In this example, nine AZs are installed on armored vehicles, each controlling its own sector. This only provides protection against UAVs, not against RPG-7 shaped-charge grenades.
  5. +1
    26 June 2026 08: 48
    I didn't understand something from the photo - how will it hit drones diving from above?
  6. 0
    26 June 2026 10: 39
    What if there is a swarm of drones on a cloud of pellets?

    A swarm of drones will be spotted from a long distance and fired at with shrapnel by a tank gun.
  7. 0
    26 June 2026 11: 03
    finally some one has been thinking sensibly about the small drones
    ive said it many many times, just got -s, prob from the resident ukelele nazis who do not want their toys shot down
    but as ive said before, if the public were all given shot guns, then alot of the small drones be taken care of
    and for not giving these to the soldiers in first place, unbelievable stupidity
    most like was not taken up because of the vast cost of lost income from the missile makers
  8. +1
    26 June 2026 12: 10
    Wouldn't it be simpler to deploy and carry the net over the protected object with the same swarm of mandrels, automatically adjusting its tilt toward the attacking side? We could even create a net dome with mandrels under a single control, like in the show, that would follow a tank, an armored personnel carrier, and an infantryman. And while parked, support the net with helium balloons to conserve resources. At least that would be more reliable. Small mandrels are too maneuverable these days, and even shooting with pellets is still a matter of shooting—hit or miss, 50/50 at best. Then there's reloading. The net would also need to be replaced due to holes from explosions. But if it deploys instantly, or several layers are deployed by drones, it could burn out.
    1. 0
      26 June 2026 12: 32
      Or a protective screen like this, or several screens made from a network of drone-carried mesh screens, 30x15 meters, maybe even larger, that flies around the facility and intercepts attack drones from critical angles. It's a shame there's no money for experiments.
    2. 0
      26 June 2026 23: 16
      I'm glad and proud that we have such technologies, electronics and nanotechnology! I forgot to mention our production!
  9. +1
    26 June 2026 12: 39
    A year ago, I tried to explain this idea, but no one was interested. Now we see the enemy...
    1. +2
      26 June 2026 12: 54
      It's all so sad. Around 21, I got into a conversation with a security guard. He turned out to be a drone engineer. He was telling me about some very interesting developments at the company where he worked. All their projects were rejected by every government agency they offered them to. The reason was simple: they were made from imported parts!!! As if there were any domestic parts back then. But basically, they demanded kickbacks, and they weren't interested. The wall.
    2. +1
      26 June 2026 13: 50
      It's sad! We invent so many things, but the Chinese produce and sell them! fool hi
    3. +1
      27 June 2026 04: 05
      Sekoba, you were not the only one, looks like those in power have never been clay pigeon shooting
      or they would have realized this long ago
  10. +2
    26 June 2026 13: 48
    Everything is correct and logical: against a swarm of UAVs - a cloud of pellets! good There is nothing cheaper and more effective! stop
  11. 0
    26 June 2026 20: 22
    The complete SCILT kit weighs no more than 300 kilograms and consumes very little energy from the on-board network.

    Lope? belay And this is for a couple of lenses and 7-9 muzzle-loading 12-gauge barrels? The top photo is absolutely spectacular – the cameras' field of view clearly doesn't correspond to the firing arc, the barrels are clearly not distributed by angle, i.e., they produce a cloud of pellets in a single plane. It looks like a makeshift solution for the word "polevo." For it to work, these blocks need to be completely encased in the equipment; a dozen won't do. A nearby explosion, raising a pile of falling debris, can instantly deplete half of this system.
    The operator simply won't have time to switch to manual mode, and what information will they rely on? There are more questions than answers here.
  12. 0
    27 June 2026 11: 56
    A new turret needs to be developed for a tank with two KS-23 turrets for shrapnel shells. This is just a sketch, a guideline. Uralvagonzavod doesn't care, as far as I understand.
  13. 0
    30 June 2026 21: 01
    Doesn't look very promising. It's cheap, yes, but the actual effectiveness is doubtful. Currently, the best interim solution seems to be a machinegun turret (RCWS) slaved to an IRST system. This can be installed on many vehicles, including trucks, that already support RCWS turrets. Into the future, a high-powered microwave (HPM) system is the ideal solution - it achieves a reliable "hardkill" on small and medium UAVs while having essentially unlimited "ammunition".
  14. 0
    7 August 2026 11: 04
    A good approach; to destroy small drones, due to their fragility, it is enough to hit their blades, etc. Moreover, their speed is not very high.
    Smoke mortars converted to throw shrapnel charges and positioned to cover all approach zones are suitable for this purpose; detection should be optical-electronic.