Mini and micro drones for armies

3 941 27
Mini and micro drones for armies
An American Black Hornet UAV. Photo by the US Department of Defense.


In our country and abroad they are developing Drones of various classes. In particular, work is underway on mini- and micro-devices with various payloads. Such equipment conducts reconnaissance and expands the capabilities of units, primarily on the front lines, but not exclusively.



Miniaturization issues


Light and small UAVs are the most widely used in militaries worldwide. Multicopters of this type have a diameter of no more than tens of centimeters and a takeoff weight of hundreds of grams. They can remain airborne for tens of minutes, travel several kilometers from their launch site, and capture high-quality footage.

In some cases, further reductions in size and weight are justified. This improves performance and sometimes opens up new possibilities. However, creating such drones is not without challenges, and the results don't always meet expectations.

The advantages of mini and micro drones over larger vehicles are:
  • ease of transportation - the operator carries more equipment or makes do with a smaller backpack or pouch;
  • ease of use - miniature UAVs can be launched literally from the operator's hand;
  • accessibility for reconnaissance - compactness allows for work not only in open areas, but also for penetration into structures;
  • low visibility - small size and low-power engine reduce the distance at which the enemy can detect and recognize the device;
  • Difficulty of destruction - a small maneuvering aerial target is difficult for fire weapons.


Miniaturization also has its downside. Small UAVs are sensitive to wind and precipitation, limited in flight time and communication range, and vulnerable to EW, and their design and payload are fragile. Furthermore, advanced systems are expensive. The Black Hornet package is valued at tens of thousands of dollars, and this value can be derived from contract prices (see the "Foreign Experience" section). Therefore, the choice between a miniature and a larger UAV is always a compromise: stealth and convenience versus autonomy, payload, and resistance to interference.

Such devices can be used by units of various profiles, primarily assault units and similar groups. Using UAVs, soldiers can quickly reconnoiter terrain or buildings, determine tactics, and adjust fire.


The Russian Goliath UAV. Photo: European Defence Review

This technology is also applicable in civilian applications, such as rescue operations and disaster relief. Here, the ability to fly in confined spaces and perform visual searches comes to the fore.

Foreign experience


Many countries are developing miniature UAVs, with the first notable successes dating back to the early 2010s. Some of these drones have entered serial production and are being supplied to the military, while individual prototypes have become benchmarks for developers worldwide.

The Black Hornet, from the American company Teledyne FLIR (originally the Norwegian company Prox Dynamics), is considered a benchmark in the micro-drone class. It's a miniature helicopter with a traditional design. Despite its tiny size, it carries three cameras: one facing forward, one mounted at an angle, and one shooting downward. Together, they provide a wide field of view, allowing the operator to simultaneously pilot the aircraft and conduct reconnaissance. Flight is only possible under remote control.

The family has been developing since the early 2010s and has gone through several generations. The first, the PD-100 Black Hornet 1 / Nano, was approximately 160 mm long and weighed approximately 18 g, with a speed of up to 20 km/h and a range of approximately 1 km. The current generation, the Black Hornet 4, is significantly larger. According to the manufacturer, it weighs approximately 70 g, is approximately 255 mm long, has a speed of up to 36 km/h, a communication range of over 3 km, and a flight time of over 30 minutes. Between the two generations lies the Black Hornet 3 (approximately 33 g, a range of up to 2 km, and an endurance of up to 25 minutes).

One detail is important: the army is not purchasing a separate Drone, but the entire kit. Under the American Soldier Borne Sensor (SBS) program, the delivery unit is the personal reconnaissance system (PRS). It consists of two drones (one in the air while the other is charging), a base station, a remote control with a screen, and a carrying case, weighing approximately 1,3 kg. According to open sources, the Pentagon has invested over $300 million in Teledyne FLIR since 2018. Several thousand drones have been ordered, corresponding to approximately 1500–2000 kits. In October 2024, another five-year contract worth up to $91 million was signed for the delivery of Black Hornet 4 systems.


The Russian Karakurt missile system in flight configuration and its transport and launch vehicle. Photo courtesy of Kalashnikov Concern.

The miniature helicopter concept, however, has not gained widespread acceptance. Most foreign mini-drones are built as copters, as this is easier to manufacture and more stable in flight. Copters of comparable size to the Black Hornet also exist. Among the known examples are developments from various countries. For example, ultra-light, palm-sized reconnaissance copters were demonstrated in China, while European companies offer pocket-sized devices, including French-designed reconnaissance microdrones for infantry units. Thus, the miniature reconnaissance niche is being explored by a wide range of manufacturers, although no single dominant standard has yet emerged, other than the Black Hornet.

Domestic development


Russian companies have already developed and brought numerous small copters into production. Mini-drones are also being developed, and there are even initial attempts to reach the micro-scale.

One of the latest developments in the mini-class is the Goliath. According to the Kalashnikov Concern, in October 2024, the successful completion of full-scale testing of the device in a special operation zone was announced. Previously, detailed performance characteristics and footage of its use were not disclosed.

The Goliath is a quadcopter with a takeoff weight of just over 1 kg in the first version (the production version, the Goliath-RU, weighs approximately 1,2 kg). The aircraft is carried by the operator in a container with a battery charger and is quickly ready for use. It is remotely controlled, and a gimbal carries an onboard camera for reconnaissance.

A caveat regarding classification is appropriate here. According to one common classification (micro-UAVs – up to 1 kg, mini-UAVs – over 1 kg), the Goliath falls into the mini class, while the 300-gram Karakurt falls into the micro class. The distinction is arbitrary, but it explains why the manufacturer categorizes devices within the same family into different categories.

The Karakurt is more interesting in its design. It's a reconnaissance quadcopter of reduced size and weight, launched from a transport and launch container (TLC). The operator carries several TLCs with the drones and a control panel on their own.


Launch of the Karakurt. Photo by Kalashnikov Concern.

The Karakurt has an elongated body with four arms and propeller-motor assemblies. During transport, the arms are stowed in the body cavities and unfold after launch. According to official Kalashnikov data, the basic version of the Karakurt-R weighs 300 g. The aircraft has an airtime of 20 minutes, reaches a speed of 25 km/h, ranges 2 km, and climbs to an altitude of 150 m.

Both lines have already received upgraded versions. The Karakurt 2.0, weighing 500 grams, now has a range of up to 2,5 km and a ceiling of up to 250 meters. The Goliath 2.0, weighing up to 1,5 kg, reportedly has increased range and flight time. The logic is clear: increased capabilities increase weight, moving the aircraft from the micro to the mini class.

There are other miniature UAVs with traditional designs. For example, the Aqua-4 is a palm-sized quadcopter weighing approximately 400 grams. It was assembled using readily available components, with a focus on simplicity. Despite its modest size, the Aqua-4 was designed to be equipped with various reconnaissance payloads: compact cameras or thermal imagers, as well as electronic equipment.

Development prospects


Mini- and micro-drones have found their place in military affairs. Accumulated experience allows us to outline possible directions for their development.

The primary role of miniature UAVs will likely remain reconnaissance. Their small size and weight preclude them from carrying complex payloads, including a sufficiently powerful warhead. Furthermore, larger and more capable platforms exist for strike missions. However, the distinction shouldn't be considered absolute: miniature loitering munitions have already emerged as a distinct category, and some "purely reconnaissance" aircraft may eventually acquire strike capabilities. It's likely that the contrast between reconnaissance and strike functions, rather than increased range or flight time, will become the primary focus of this class's development.

Payloads will continue to improve. New cameras and sensors, high-resolution thermal imagers, and possibly even compact electronic reconnaissance systems will appear. But the key limitation will remain not optics, but weight: each additional sensor will have to be paid for with flight time.

The control systems likely won't change dramatically: a reconnaissance mini-drone operates under direct operator control and doesn't require full autonomy. However, communications will need to be significantly improved. The radio channel must remain operational in the presence of obstacles and under the influence of electronic warfare. Wired solutions, which are a boon for larger FPV drones, are almost inapplicable here: a coil and fiber optic cable will significantly increase the aircraft's weight and hinder its maneuverability. Therefore, emphasis will have to be placed on the radio channel's own interference immunity, meaning frequency hopping, directional antennas, and robust protocols.

Placing drones in containers also offers potential: they serve as transport, launch, and recharging points, simplifying maintenance and flight preparation. Essentially, the container, rather than the drone itself, is gradually becoming the central component of the operator's work in the field.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    23 June 2026 04: 50
    Back in the early 2000s, Military Parade magazine advertised a mini drone called "Pchelka" (though this isn't certain). It could be launched from the palm of your hand. It was invisible in urban areas from 50 meters away. It was some kind of private development.
    And so it sank into oblivion.
    1. 0
      23 June 2026 07: 35
      The next stage is also visible, similar to larger UAVs: equipping them with weapons and then operating as part of a swarm.
  2. 0
    23 June 2026 09: 03
    Mini, micro... small payload, reconnaissance only. Shooting it down, as I understand, is difficult.
  3. +1
    23 June 2026 11: 12
    For the army to begin using modern warfare tools at the squad and company level (drones, thermal imagers, smart sights, communications, etc.), a reform of the current military system is needed. It's important to remember that the fighting in the SVO is currently not conscripts, but contract soldiers and volunteers. So, how do you equip a conscript with a drone or thermal imager and send him on field exercises?
    1. +1
      23 June 2026 12: 21
      Some time will pass, and humans will stop attacking altogether. Everything will be either remote or AI-assisted. laughing After some time, the AI ​​will decide why it needs a human... see John Connor
  4. +2
    23 June 2026 11: 52
    Microdrones are likely to fall by the wayside in the evolutionary race due to their poor wind resistance. Their electronics must be ultra-lightweight and expensive, so if they survive at all, it will only be in the narrow niche of reconnaissance in confined spaces. In the field, such drones are a waste of money.
    1. +2
      23 June 2026 12: 17
      Microdrones are likely to fall out of the evolutionary race due to their poor wind resistance. Their electronics need to be super-lightweight.

      Is the Bumblebee wind-resistant enough? As for electronics, I'd say it all depends on the requirements. Microcameras and microtransmitters and receivers are available. Next, we'll decide what to attach: a laser pointer to illuminate the target for the warheads, a listening or other scanning device, or a repeater (instead of the current "remote"). It'll definitely handle one function. A useful thing!
      1. 0
        23 June 2026 12: 26
        Quote: tehnix

        Is the bumblebee wind-resistant enough?!

        It has a charger on every flower, and it can land anywhere to wait out a gust of wind. To illuminate a target for a warhead, you need something more powerful than a laser pointer, and a repeater is also a very important thing. The eavesdropping part made me smile. "Stop the propellers, we'll eavesdrop on enemy headquarters from a bunker." wassat It's a useful thing, I don't argue, but it's in a very narrow niche.
        1. 0
          23 June 2026 12: 36
          So we need to copy the bumblebee—we can't just illuminate the target from the air! Everything has already existed in nature, we just don't always see it and understand it...
          1. 0
            23 June 2026 12: 40
            We haven't yet reached the level of copying nature, and we're unlikely to do so in the near future.
        2. 0
          24 June 2026 16: 09
          The repeater weighs the same as two sets of transceivers. That's between 7 and 14 grams per set. Plus, of course, there's power (but a camera and transceiver consume about the same amount as two transceivers—meaning the battery remains the same). Accordingly, the main drone carries the camera, and the drones hovering between it and the operator carry the second transceiver set instead of the camera.
          And target illumination—it should be contrasting with the target's background, not overly powerful (for other targets, a laser pointer will suffice). This is entirely feasible even for a micro-drone, given the short flight time of the weapon (and, consequently, the short duration of the laser's operation).
          1. 0
            24 June 2026 17: 36
            All this is good, but it doesn't eliminate the main drawback: the device's feather weight is dependent on the wind. They're generally good – less visible, quieter, and easier to carry. They'll reign supreme in the narrow confines of urban combat, but in the field, it's questionable.
            1. +1
              8 July 2026 22: 38
              Все увлеклись коптерами, но ведь бывают и крылатые аппараты. Они менее чувствительны к ветру, и скомпенсировать влияние ветра в них проще
              1. 0
                8 July 2026 23: 06
                Quote: futurohunter
                Все увлеклись коптерами, но ведь бывают и крылатые аппараты. Они менее чувствительны к ветру, и скомпенсировать влияние ветра в них проще

                Вы имеете в виду самолётного типа ? Да , с ветром у них проще, но есть один недостаток - зависимость способности к полёту от скорости. Хотя, наверное, просто в сторону увеличения аэродинамического качества просто не думал никто - хороший планер много сложнее сделать, чем квадрик.
                1. +1
                  9 July 2026 00: 16
                  Так при увеличении аэродинамического качества и снижении нагрузки на крыло, как раз чувствительность к ветру повышается. А почему планер сложно сделать? Как раз БПЛА-"крылья" проще по конструкции. И под "планером" вы имеете в виду планер самолёта, или планирующий летательный аппарат?
                  1. 0
                    9 July 2026 08: 56
                    Quote: futurohunter
                    Так при увеличении аэродинамического качества и снижении нагрузки на крыло, как раз чувствительность к ветру повышается. А почему планер сложно сделать? Как раз БПЛА-"крылья" проще по конструкции. И под "планером" вы имеете в виду планер самолёта, или планирующий летательный аппарат?

                    Да, тут замкнутый круг получается - хочешь быть медленным в воздухе - принимай ветер.Планер сложнее относительно просто четырёх винтов, без всякого планера. Самолётный имел в виду.
                    1. 0
                      9 July 2026 12: 33
                      А чем сложнее? Самолётный планер может целиком изготавливаться из пенопласта. Прямо отливкой в формы. Достаточно добавить отсек управления с сенсорами, и рулевые машинки с рулями. Причём, в самом простом варианте, достаточно двух элевонов, как на "Герани". Понятно, что такой по помещениям летать не сможет. Но на открытом пространстве - легко
                      1. 0
                        9 July 2026 19: 01
                        Отливка из пенопласта - это уже заводское массовое производство. А перед этим этот планер нужно через ародинамическую трубу пропустить. Так-то в большой серии это будет конечно дёшево, но в процессе испытаний и отладки весь процесс сложнее, чем просто квадрики, которые в гараже можно делать. В плане маневренности такая вещь тоже будет квадрикам уступать - скорость для дроновода скорее усложняющий фактор. В перехватчиках этим самолётикам самая ниша будет Yes
                      2. 0
                        9 July 2026 19: 06
                        Слушайте, пионеры эти летающие модели, как пирожки пекли. Технология пенопласт-стеклопластик - это очень просто. На любой кухне-балконеможно делать. А про аэродинамическую трубу не сочиняйте - можно взять любую книжку для юных авиамоделистов и сделать летающую модель, обладая знаниями не более школьного курса физики.
                        Маневренность - вообще дело десятое. Скорость ничего не усложняет, она не настолько высока. Да и для наведения всё чаще компьютерное зрение используют. Оператор только производит захват цели, дальше дрон наводится сам
                      3. 0
                        9 July 2026 19: 15
                        Quote: futurohunter

                        Маневренность - вообще дело десятое. Скорость ничего не усложняет, она не настолько высока.

                        Посмотрите видео работы по убегающим и прячущимся за естественными преградами, и представьте себя на месте оператора. Самолёт десять раз уже промазал бы в землю, а квадрик обходит столбы, заходит с тыла, ныряет в траншеи . Самолётику это не по зубам.
                      4. 0
                        9 July 2026 20: 22
                        Всё зависит от того, по чем стрелять. Например, можно выстрелить по боевой машине, или по окну здания, где прячутся боевики, и поразить их гораздо быстрее, чем квадриком. Что касается прячущихся за преградами, так ведь, в определённых случаях можно и упасть за преградой и взорваться там.
                        При этом, как мы обсуждали, "самолёт", в отличие от вертолёта может летать при сильном ветре и в плохую погоду. Ну, не в ураган, конечно, но в ураган никто и носа не высовывает))
                        Ещё один плюс у "самолёта": при большой скорости полёта и низкой нагрузке на крыло (соответственно, невысокой маневренности), он менее чувствителен к вражескому огню. Даже дрон в дырках может продолжать полёт на цель. Но, не прямолинейный конечно, а пикирование. Возможен запуск дронов и по навесной траектории. Кстати, они могут выстреливаться стартовым двигателем из трубы, набирать высоту, а потом уже сверху пикировать на цель. Отбится от него в этом случае и некогда и крайне сложно. И даже дробь, противодроновые ружья и сети мало помогут от пикирующего на большой скорости и под большим углом аппарата. И он может быть вовсе не из пенопласта. Возможен вариант с прочным корпусом, пробивающим преграду, и взрывателем с замедлением.
                        Короче, у "вертолётов" свои плюсы и минусы, а у "самолётов" - свои. Ещё один вариант - совместное применение "вертолётов" и "самолётов", которое станет кошмаром для противника. Отбиваясь от одних, он попадает под удар других
                      5. 0
                        9 July 2026 21: 36
                        Quote: futurohunter
                        Всё зависит от того, по чем стрелять. Например, можно выстрелить по боевой машине, или по окну здания, где прячутся боевики, и поразить их гораздо быстрее, чем квадриком.

                        Да, но это уже более тяжёлые машины. Речь то была о сверхлёгких, которым ветер мешает. Так-то барражирующие боеприпасы тоже вроде самолётов , и уже летают hi
                      6. 0
                        10 July 2026 07: 23
                        В принципе, такая крылатая граната может весить 300-600 грамм, как настоящая ручная граната, и, как я сказал, запускаться с рук, как бумажный самолётик, или выстреливаться из пусковой трубы. Да, это похоже на барражирующие боеприпасы
  5. 0
    24 June 2026 12: 20
    Laser beam control for microdrones, if you learn to modulate the laser beam.
    1. 0
      24 June 2026 16: 00
      There is no problem with modeling a laser beam (such equipment existed 40 years ago - the same CD players).
      The only problem is how to "hit" a drone with a laser beam from the ground (it's solvable, since there are practically no restrictions on the weight and size of the tracking equipment), and, what's worse, how to "hit" a receiver on the ground from the drone ("that's science fiction, son")...
      1. 0
        24 June 2026 16: 22
        Experimentation is needed here. It's difficult. But who said it would be easy?
  6. 0
    8 July 2026 22: 36
    Стоит ждать крылатые гранаты с автономным наведением, в том числе, и внутри помещений