Combat use of the Banderol missiles

9 029 17
Combat use of the Banderol missiles


In 2025, the Russian combat aviation received and began to use a new winged rocket "Banderol." Reports of its use subsequently became regular. A combination of characteristics helped. Its flight and combat performance were quite high, while its production was comparatively simple.



Let's make it clear right away and not repeat it again. There is no official Russian technical documentation for the "Banderoli." Almost everything known about its characteristics and combat use comes from leaks, Ukrainian intelligence reports, journalistic and analytical reconstructions, and OSINT analyses. Any "precise" performance characteristics are currently estimates, and this is worth keeping in mind.

Secret development


In recent years, for obvious reasons, the Russian defense industry has been reluctant to disclose promising developments. Some models are only revealed after production and combat use have begun, and often come from Ukraine first.

That's exactly what happened with "Banderol." In April 2025, Ukrainian sources reported a new threat. Allegedly, since the beginning of the year, the Russian army had been using some kind of attack UAV of an unknown model. It was then that the code name "Banderol" was first used.

Ukrainian intelligence identified the Kronshtadt group as the developer. This theory was picked up by a number of Russian publications, but neither the developer nor the Russian Ministry of Defense confirmed it. There is also indirect evidence in its favor. Kronshtadt manufactures the Orion UAV (export production name "Inohodets"; they are the same machine), which is said to be the missile's primary carrier.

Early reports, however, raised questions. For a long time, Ukrainian specialists couldn't even determine the general appearance of the "Banderoli." Infographics depicted "flying wings" and then conventional aerodynamic designs. At first, they talked about a strike UAV, then they started calling it a cruise missile.

Combat application


The sequence of events can be reconstructed as follows. According to enemy data, the first launches took place in early 2025. In April 2025, Ukrainian sources reported them, initially mistaking the missile for a strike UAV. By spring 2025, the picture became clearer. It became clear that a new cruise missile had entered service with the Russian Air Force. There is no official designation, so the "Ukrainian" name "Banderol" remains in use.

Little is known about the very first launches. How many there were, what their targets were, and what their results were was never disclosed.

Subsequently, the Ukrainian side complained about further launches on several occasions. As early as 2026, in early June, there were reports of hits on targets in the Kharkiv region, and by the middle of that month, according to Ukrainian data and OSINT reports, the missile was used in massive strikes against Kyiv. The enemy has not disclosed the results, and this silence is interpreted in two ways: either as a sign of a significant hit or as a sign that the damage was minor.

They're also trying to keep count. The OSINT project LostArmour estimates around 20 massive strikes involving "Panderoli" [illegible text]. This figure is unverified, as it was not possible to verify it against publicly available database cards. So, this is an estimate by the OSINT community, nothing more.


A newer version: "Panderol" as a cruise missile. Graphics by Overclockers.ru

And yet, it's clear that the "Banderol" is used regularly, both individually and in massive raids, and in the latter case, together with various UAVs and other missile models.

The geography of the strikes is also interesting. The first missiles were used against targets in the Odessa region, followed by strikes in the outskirts of Odessa. In the spring of 2025, the first strikes were reported in the Mykolaiv region, and later in the Dnipropetrovsk region. In recent weeks, the strikes have extended to Kharkiv and Kyiv.

The strike map shows the effective range, but not the maximum. The maximum range is derived from the stated specifications, and the map is of no help. And here's what's striking: most of the known attacks occurred on targets near the Black Sea coast. The explanation is more tactical than mysterious. Ukrainian specialists estimate the range of the "Banderol" missile at 450-500 km; if so, then targets in the Odessa and Mykolaiv regions are significantly closer to the maximum range, and the missile's radius is far from fully utilized. Targets further away seem to be more often targeted by cruise missiles and other types of UAVs, while the "Banderol" missile is launched where it offers the best range-to-cost ratio.

Technical potential


At first, the enemy described the Banderol as a "flying wing," but then the missile was reclassified as an air-launched cruise missile. It appears the latter version is closer to the truth.

The Banderol is a traditional-looking ALCM. It features a stretched, complexly shaped fuselage (possibly to reduce radar signature), as well as fold-out wings and stabilizers with rudders.

Dimensions and weight, according to open estimates, are approximately as follows (all figures are approximate and not factory ones):

  • length - approx. 5 m;
  • fuselage diameter - 300 mm;
  • wingspan - 2–2,2 m (folding);
  • starting weight - no more than 200–250 kg;
  • The combat load ranges from ~50 to ~150 kg. The discrepancy is likely due to the fact that some sources cite the full warhead weight (up to ~150 kg), while others cite only the explosive mass (around 49–50 kg, which is close to the lower limit).

The engine is presumably a turbojet, and analysts are calling it the Chinese Swiwin SW800Pro-A95. This conclusion is based on a comparison of publicly available photos and parameters of commercial engine models; no official confirmation has been made, so an independent technical review is needed. The estimated flight performance depends on the engine:
  • cruising speed - approx. 520–560 km/h;
  • maximum speed – up to 620–650 km/h;
  • flight range: 450–500 km.


The "Banderol" missile strikes stationary targets with predetermined coordinates. It is guided to its target by an autopilot and combined inertial-satellite navigation (GLONASS/GPS/BeiDou) with a jam-resistant antenna, which is believed to provide decent accuracy.


The Inokhodets unmanned aerial vehicle. Photo by the Russian Ministry of Defense.

The primary carrier is said to be the Inokhodets heavy reconnaissance and attack UAV (some sources refer to it as the Orion). The combination, based on its weight, dimensions, and intended use, is convincing, and is confirmed by several sources, including Russian ones, but these are still expert assessments rather than official performance specifications. Other platforms are also possible, particularly the Mi-28N helicopter. This is purely speculative for now: there are no launches from the Mi-28N, no photos of the sling, and no official statements.

Flexibility and efficiency


Of course, not everything the Ukrainian side says is true. But taken together, the data adds up to a plausible picture: the "Banderol" exists, is mass-produced, and is used in special operations.

The niche of the new ALCM is clear - between tactical missiles (Kh-29, Kh-31) and weapons Strategic aviation (Kh-555, Kh-101/102). This means the Aerospace Forces gain a greater range than tactical missiles, but without the need for long-range aviation, since the carrier is a UAV.

The "Banderol" became a UAV weapon, making strikes cheaper. An unmanned carrier is significantly superior to a manned aircraft: it's cheaper per flight hour, doesn't put the crew at risk, and airfields are easier to access. Therefore, the combination of a UAV and a cheap ALCM is convenient when mass destruction is needed.

But there is a downside. A subsonic, stealthy missile at speeds of around 550 km/h is too slow for a modern Defense — the target is vulnerable. How far it will fly and hit depends on how tightly the targets are covered. Hence the massive combined air strikes: the "Pancake" is deployed in a single package with other UAVs and missiles to overwhelm the defenses. And there are plenty of replacements, since the Russian army has plenty of strike aircraft. drones for the same tasks, and a wide range of products allows you to select ammunition for each target based on characteristics and price.

The "Banderol" and similar weapons weren't invented by chance: long-range, accurate, and yet inexpensive air defense weapons are especially in demand right now. They're already being used extensively. But how much damage they'll do will be determined not so much by the missile itself, but by what meets it over its target.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. BAI
    0
    18 June 2026 06: 18
    But how much it will fight will be determined not so much by the missile itself, but by what meets it over the target.

    The question of how long it will last will be decided by the number of missiles and the will to use them.
  2. +1
    18 June 2026 07: 03
    The performance characteristics in the main photo are ridiculous - it turned out fast, as much as 500 km per year, that's something belay
    1. 0
      18 June 2026 08: 39
      Quote: Popandos
      The performance characteristics in the main photo are ridiculous - it turned out fast, as much as 500 km per year, that's something belay
      This is the Ukrainian language and “year” is short for “godyna” (hour in translation)
      1. 0
        18 June 2026 22: 01
        hour in translation
        Oops, sorry, I'm not very good at foreign languages, so I'm not very good at writing Russian letters. If only it were written in Ukrainian letters... bully hi
  3. -1
    18 June 2026 08: 55
    It turned out to be a small cruise missile. It would be good to launch it from ground-based launchers so as not to hit aircraft.
  4. +1
    18 June 2026 09: 56
    For some reason, in the USSR and the Russian Federation, unlike the USA and the EU, ammunition is made for one exclusive carrier.
    Although, it needs to be done immediately for all tactical aviation, attack helicopters, and for ground/naval installations.
    The same Su34 could carry 8-10 of them.
    1. 0
      18 June 2026 14: 47
      For diversification, to employ more managers and not offend every tank factory! For example, you can't force Almaz-Antey to figure out how to fit their radar and control center into the Il-76; Vega should do it, spend 20 years, hundreds of billions of rubles, and still get nothing done. request
      1. 0
        18 June 2026 15: 04
        In terms of cruise missiles, the only ones that are unified are the Tu-96 and Tu-160... They've produced a proliferation of identical missiles, each with its own aircraft.
        I'm surprised that they thought of installing a universal PY on ships for Caliber, Onyx, Zircon.
        The Su-30MKI carries BrahMos, while the Su-30SM doesn't. The Kinzhal, while apparently performing well, only flies on the MiG-31Ts.
        1. 0
          18 June 2026 15: 22
          I'm surprised that they thought of installing a universal PY on ships for Caliber, Onyx, Zircon.
          Apparently, they were trying to impersonate the Americans for export deliveries. But not completely. They even put anti-aircraft missiles in the slots, while we're not allowed to. We certainly won't be ordering missiles for the S-400 to fit in the Zircon slot. stop
          The Su-30MKI carries BrahMos, while the Su-30SM doesn't. The Kinzhal, while apparently performing well, only flies on the MiG-31Ts.
          And the enemies somehow took Soviet planes and converted them to carry Western missiles in just a few months! belay
          It's some kind of magic. Or maybe some people just want to ride, while others prefer checkers, and those who are taller are closer to checkers, since they're practically chess players. lol
          1. 0
            18 June 2026 15: 30
            Moreover, Brahmos from Onyx with our help.
          2. 0
            21 June 2026 00: 31
            Quote from alexoff
            But for us, it's not allowed; we certainly won't be ordering missiles for the S-400 to fit into the Zircon cell.

            Actually, the UKSK was created for frigates (Project 11356 and 22350) and Project 20385 corvettes, as well as for the modernization of Project 1155. The radar complex for the S-400/Fort-2 SAMs on all these ships is too weak. Separate UKSKs were created for the Redut SAMs, tailored to their size. And when they finally decided to modernize the Nakhimov... they thought about it. After all, in place of the carousel launchers for the Fort, they could have placed a UKSK with 120 cells with SAMs for the Fort-2/S-400 instead of 96 SAMs in carousels... but heavy SAMs won't fit in the cells - they won't fit because of the fins. They need either folding fins, or a new SAM based on the old one, but with different, more compact fins. But doing that for one... well, maybe for two (with "Peter", if they get around to modernizing it) ships... is troublesome and irrational. And they're not planning on building large ships with a powerful radar system for such SAMs yet. So they left the old carousels, because even with them, "Nakhimov" has an unprecedentedly large sled for heavy SAMs, cruise missiles, anti-ship missiles, anti-submarine rockets, and surface-to-air missiles. 80 + 96 = 176 pcs., and that's not counting the 6 "Pantsir-ME" modules (6 x 44 = 264 pcs., if you count "Gvozdi"). So, for now, that's how it is. Although there were rumors that Almaz-Antey was working on a new BD SAM for the "Fort-M" to fit into the slot. But the rumors have not yet been confirmed.
            Quote from alexoff
            At the same time, the Su30MKI carries BrahMos, the Su30SM does not carry Onyx/BrahMos.

            The Indian Su-30MKI carries a special lightweight BrahMos with a launch weight of 2500 kg, while the standard BrahMos weighs 3600 kg. And yet, the central pylon had to be significantly reinforced for it, practically creating a new modification of the aircraft. Why do we need all that? We have enough missiles for heavy fighters, just in case. There are various modifications of the Kh-31, the Kh-59, the Kh-58, and many other different ones. They have higher speed, and at least as much range, and different warheads. And for large surface targets, there is the Kh-32. The Ostrota anti-ship missile is being developed for the Su-57. And the Onyx... the anti-ship missile is certainly good, but compared to the Zircon, it is a thing of the past.
            Quote from alexoff
            And the enemies somehow took Soviet planes and converted them to carry Western missiles in just a few months!
            It's some kind of magic.

            There's no magic involved—it's a necessary measure. They're not the first to do this. Why do we need it? Our VB missiles are standard on all new fighters and can be used. The MiG-35S could also use any such missile if it went into production. So, our air defense capabilities are in perfect order, and it's enough to make our enemies jealous—they don't have anything like ours. The R-37M, the R-97, and many other things. The issue is quantity—the number of combat aircraft. Because, as all materialist Leninists know, quantity always grows into quality. That's why the Aerospace Forces are growing numerically now, combining numerical growth with rearmament from old types to new ones.
      2. 0
        18 June 2026 15: 08
        I think that these guys could also make an AWACS

        The N035 Irbis is a Russian multi-mode airborne phased-array radar developed by NIIP and GRPZ. The radar's average transmit power is approximately 5 kW, with a maximum of 20 kW. Beam control is electronic (with mechanical rotation of the antenna sheet via a two-stage electrohydraulic drive to increase the beam deflection angle). The detection range for aerial targets is up to 400 km.[2]
        1. 0
          18 June 2026 15: 23
          I remember they were suggesting putting Irbis on mobilized business jets! Those bastards, they're encroaching on what's sacred!
          1. 0
            18 June 2026 15: 29
            Yes, I read that. It's a good idea. Take that same Tu-214 and install a couple of them.
  5. 0
    18 June 2026 13: 01
    I'm sorry, but the pig-faced ones can get an equivalent of this missile from the Americans... Rusty Dagger
    1. 0
      18 June 2026 13: 55
      There's no problem with the analogue. Such ersatz cruise missiles should be "cheap" and produced in large quantities. This will happen to us too. The EU and the US have a couple of such projects coming out.
  6. 0
    19 June 2026 07: 14
    -Do you see a gopher?
    -No
    -And it is!
    ....
    The essence of the stories about the Parcel