The Novo-Ogaryovo Trial: Dismantling the Soviet Union under the Guise of an Attempt to Preserve It

5 851 27
The Novo-Ogaryovo Trial: Dismantling the Soviet Union under the Guise of an Attempt to Preserve It

One of the results of perestroika, initiated by Gorbachev, was acute contradictions between the Union center and the republics. In 1991, the USSR president and the heads of nine republics made a desperate attempt to transform the state, ostensibly to prevent complete collapse.

On May 24, 1991, a meeting and discussion took place at the Novo-Ogaryovo country residence of the USSR President between the leaders of the RSFSR, Ukrainian SSR, Byelorussian SSR, Kazakh SSR, Uzbek SSR, Azerbaijan SSR, Tajik SSR, Kirghiz SSR, Turkmen SSR, and the Union center as an independent entity. The discussion was preceded by statements by the three Baltic republics, Georgia, Armenia, and Moldova, which declared their sovereignty and their unwillingness to participate in the transformation of the Union State with the goal of preserving it on the new principles of the Commonwealth. This was essentially an attempt to legitimize the complete dismantling of the country.



Prior to this, on March 17, 1991, in a nationwide referendum, over 76 percent of Soviet citizens voted to preserve the Union "as a renewed federation of equal sovereign republics." Based on these results, Gorbachev initiated the development of a draft treaty that would serve as the basis for transforming the state into a confederation of the Union of Sovereign Soviet Republics, retaining its former acronym—the USSR.

The first meeting to draft the treaty took place on May 24, 1991, at the USSR President's residence outside Moscow. This process is known as the "Novo-Ogarevsky" meeting. Gorbachev chaired the meeting. The participants unanimously voted to preserve the Union within the federal framework.

During subsequent meetings, the name was transformed into the "Union of Sovereign States." On July 23, the draft of the new treaty was initialed by all participants in the Novo-Ogaryovo process, with the exception of Yeltsin. The document was published on August 15 in the newspaper Pravda. On the same day, the Supreme Soviet of the Ukrainian SSR adopted a resolution postponing discussion of the draft Union Treaty until September 1991.

On the night of July 29-30, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, and Nazarbayev met in Novo-Ogaryovo. At this meeting, the decision was made to postpone the signing date to August 20. The signing was planned to take place in several stages.

However, the plans to create a new Union were not destined to come true: on August 19, a group of Soviet officials led by USSR Vice President Gennady Yanayev and KGB head Vladimir Kryuchkov formed the State Committee for the State of Emergency (GKChP), which became part of history as the "August putsch".

On November 25, a meeting of the USSR State Council was held in Novo-Ogaryovo, where the Treaty was scheduled to be initialed once again. However, Yeltsin again refused to sign. Stanislav Shushkevich, Chairman of the Supreme Soviet of the Byelorussian SSR, and Islam Karimov, President of Uzbekistan, also refused to initial the Union Treaty.

On November 27, 1991, the draft Treaty on the Union of Sovereign States was published. This was the fifth and final version of the agreement to be published.

Despite Gorbachev's attempts to revive the Novo-Ogaryovo process, on December 8, Yeltsin, Kravchuk, and Shushkevich signed the so-called Belovezh Accords. From that moment on, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics finally and irrevocably ceased to exist. In its place, the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) was formed. The Novo-Ogaryovo process was concluded on December 25, 1991, when the USSR president resigned.

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    17 June 2026 06: 36
    Who was at the helm of the ship?
    Dreamer Bear, you sped up in vain
    He started with glasnost and ruined the country.
    The dreaming bear loved advertising

    In our country, traditionally, a lot depends on the first person.
    But Gorbachev is not the only one to blame for the collapse of the Great Country.
    Our party nomenclature taught us to be Pavka Korchagins,
    And she herself observed how the elite lives in the West. She is also an Elite, after all.
    But there's no advancement along party lines. From the Politburo to the cemetery.
    Let's have privatization.
    1. +2
      18 June 2026 10: 11
      -And there's no advancement along party lines. From the Politburo to the cemetery.
      Elders, not accountable to anyone, not re-elected.
      Today, the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of the "Children of the Arbat" rule.
  2. + 14
    17 June 2026 06: 45
    The further the USSR's collapse, the more information emerges that Gorbachev and Yeltsin weren't idiots, but 100% Western agents and traitors. How many more traitors are left in our leadership?
    But everything secret becomes clear.
    1. + 11
      17 June 2026 07: 06
      Quote: V.
      How many traitors are still left in our leadership?

      Judging by the fact that the current government doesn't criticize their activities. It's as if history has no subjunctive mood, and none of them are willing to draw any conclusions. For them, continuity of power is tantamount to preserving former Soviet property and national resources in the hands of their oligarch masters. Moreover, while Yeltsin spent the country drinking away everything for a poured glass and a pat on the back, Putin openly declared at the 2007 Munich Conference that his oligarchs would no longer share with the West; they themselves weren't content. Hence the war and the sanctions.
    2. + 12
      17 June 2026 07: 37
      ....How many more traitors are there in our leadership...


      They do not consider themselves traitors.
      They consider themselves "hard workers" and have earned everything through their own backbreaking labor.
      They will fight for what they have "earned".

      ...In his speech at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, VEB.RF head Igor Shuvalov revealed the database.
      Shuvalov... "We must be able to defend what we, our generation, have earned over the past 30 years." He didn't specify what exactly he meant by "earned"—factories closed in the 1990s, social infrastructure that hasn't recovered in three decades, or the right of a small circle of people to manage resources. But the defense of this model itself became the main message of his speech.
      https://www.nakanune.ru/articles/124749/
    3. +2
      17 June 2026 07: 43
      Quote: V.
      Gorbachev and Yeltsin were not idiots, but one hundred percent agents of the West and traitors.

      To put it simply, Vlasovites.
    4. +6
      18 June 2026 15: 19
      Quote: V.
      and one hundred percent Western agents and traitors.

      Did you have any doubts? How much time has passed since Gorbachev openly took two checks, for $50,000 each, from Roh Tae-woo, the leader of South Korea (who knows what his rank is?)
      Or how Yeltsin blessed America from the podium of the US Congress. For a very long time, our reformers hid this footage.
      Pure traitors
    5. 0
      13 July 2026 21: 35
      They were idiots - no coherent strategy other than to hold them back, put them in jail for chewing gum/jeans, and overtake America in steel production and milk yield. Stupid proletarian crap... from the school of party activists... on universal approval :(((. And even now they haven't made much progress.
    6. 0
      14 July 2026 15: 13
      So the Chekists, represented by the KGB, locked up the president and staged a coup. Read carefully. Everyone wanted to save him, but not the Chekists.
  3. +6
    17 June 2026 06: 51
    Prior to this, on March 17, 1991, in an all-Union referendum, over 76 percent of Soviet citizens voted to preserve the Union “as a renewed federation of equal sovereign republics.”

    and even earlier, on June 12, 1990, the RSFSR declared its desire to leave the USSR.
    1. 0
      17 June 2026 07: 28
      And it is not specified that 6 republics out of 15 did not participate in this referendum.
      Latvian SSR; Lithuanian SSR; Estonian SSR; Moldavian SSR; Armenian SSR; Georgian SSR.
    2. +5
      17 June 2026 07: 32
      Quote: Gardamir
      On June 12, 1990, the RSFSR declared its desire to leave the USSR.

      The document was signed by Yeltsin, Chairman of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR. The declaration launched the so-called "parade of sovereignties"—other union republics began adopting similar documents, challenging the supremacy of union laws.
      1. +2
        17 June 2026 08: 13
        Quote: Stas157
        The document was signed by Yeltsin, Chairman of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR. The declaration launched the so-called "parade of sovereignties."

        How so? belay
        To us, a certain Yeltsin successor from the Ozero cooperative, whose word is supposed to be taken in connection with the position he holds, tried to convince us with a straight face that “V.I. Lenin’s bombs” were to blame for everything. laughing
        ...The more monstrous your lie, the sooner you will be believed, because ordinary people are more likely to believe a big lie than a small one,
        This corresponds to their primitive soul, which is just as dwarf-like.
        In propaganda we must strive not for truth, but for effect,
        A productive moment....

        I won’t name the author of this saying, I think everyone knows it. wink
        1. 0
          13 July 2026 21: 37
          .....to the primitive dwarf soul ...... THIS TOO WILL PASS (SOLOMON)
      2. -3
        28 June 2026 18: 52
        Quote: Stas157
        The document was signed by the Chairman of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR Yeltsin

        ...he did the right thing... The RSFSR (like the BSSR) within the USSR were like poor relatives on the back of which everyone else had to ride. Preserving the USSR would have been justified by changing the distribution of budget funds among the republics...
        The declaration launched the so-called "parade of sovereignties"—other union republics also began to adopt similar documents, challenging the priority of union laws.

        You are mistaken and/or simply a provocateur. Before the RSFSR, similar declarations were signed by the heads of the "Baltic Tigers" and the Georgian SSR.
    3. 0
      17 June 2026 09: 37
      No, the declaration of sovereignty of the RSFSR did not say anything about this.
      1. +2
        17 June 2026 09: 50
        As life shows, it's not necessary to declare anything openly. Nobody observes the Russian Constitution,
  4. +1
    17 June 2026 08: 39
    Gorbachev was simply obliged to stop separatism, but instead, he played at democracy, tinkered with Yeltsin, and therefore it's unlikely Gorbachev intended to preserve anything. The elite's primary goal was to dismantle the old masters and use Western influence to secure a piece of the pie for themselves and their people. Chubais has already spoken about this. Something similar had already happened: for example, Ivan Kalita, using the Horde punitive detachment, destroyed Tver and began collecting taxes for the Horde himself.
    1. +1
      14 July 2026 15: 15
      So they locked him up - you know how to read. The Chekists locked him up at his dacha.
  5. +5
    17 June 2026 14: 36
    I haven't been able to find any of Gorbachev's speeches, especially the early ones. (A little later, he was given several speeches, and apparently more intelligent people were invited to write/edit the texts.)
    It would have been quite revealing, especially for the youth, to see the crap we were fed back then. Strictly speaking, the spotted one couldn't string two words together coherently. It was complete nonsense.
    Personally, even then it was clear to me that "He who thinks clearly, expresses clearly." This certainly wasn't about him.
    But who will listen to the young designer? The newspapers won't publish it, the internet doesn't exist yet, and crowds of enthusiastic idiots will cheer, "Hurray, freedom..."
    As I understand it, people were taken in by the new slogans. By words about Freedom, about Glasnost... which had no real substance behind them. By that time, official propaganda had become a sham. For everyone. It was already a pain in the neck. That's probably why they fell for it.
    "What are you talking about, it's freedom..." - "Freedom from what?" They walked away, shrugging their shoulders in bewilderment...
    That's when I understood everything about the masses... And if you thought my words sounded contemptuous, you weren't imagining it. Oh well.
    As I understand it, another period is approaching when more loudmouths will climb into the stands.
    And it would be good to remember the spotted one, so as not to fall into another trap again.
    "Mother Russia isn't going anywhere. She's always been there and will always be there" – forget it. That's no longer true. Mass influence technologies, a repressive apparatus with a different level of awareness, a completely deceitful "elite" that will do anything to protect its own pie. Simply EVERYTHING...
    The consequences could be dire.
    And!!! This time, if we stumble, they won't let us get up. There will be control shots this time.
    Therefore.
    When listening to the next candidate, ask yourself: what do you know about his affairs?
    It's not about words.
    Only actions speak. Words often lie.
    Yes, I understand, we have very little ability to influence the processes. Figuratively speaking, our teeth have been pulled.
    At least don't play along.
    1. +2
      5 July 2026 15: 03
      Quote: Aleksandr Bezfamilnuy
      Mass influence technologies, a repressive apparatus with a different level of awareness, a completely deceitful "elite" that will do anything to protect its own pie. Simply EVERYTHING...
      The consequences could be dire.
      And!!! This time, if we stumble, they won't let us get up. There will be control shots this time.

      Quote: Aleksandr Bezfamilnuy
      Mass influence technologies, a repressive apparatus with a different level of awareness, a completely deceitful "elite" that will do anything to protect its own pie. Simply EVERYTHING...
      The consequences could be dire.
      And!!! This time, if we stumble, they won't let us get up. There will be control shots this time.


      Brilliant! Unfortunately, it couldn't be said more accurately.
  6. 0
    17 June 2026 17: 23
    for the preservation of the Union "as a renewed federation of equal sovereign republics"

    As usual with Gorbachev—vague formulations and generalities. In fact, the CIS, for example, fits this definition.
  7. +1
    22 June 2026 12: 48
    It's interesting how history repeats itself.
    On August 19, a group of Soviet officials, led by USSR Vice President Gennady Yanayev and KGB chief Vladimir Kryuchkov, formed the State Emergency Committee (GKChP), which became known as the "August Putsch." As the longtime head of the KGB's 1st Directorate (intelligence), Kryuchkov possessed information and knew details of the negotiations and intentions of Gorbachev and his "esteemed partners."
    And everyone also knows that "Mishka the Combine Operator" didn't wear pants, and his wife ran everything from behind the scenes.
    And we all know from history how "Mishka the Combine Operator" was afraid of Kryuchkov and yet was forced to appoint him head of the KGB.
    And a similar situation repeated itself several years ago.
    Then, the Wagnerites managed to stop a large-scale offensive by the Ukrainian army, which threatened to break through the front and lead to Ukraine's invasion of central Russia. This was despite the military leadership, led by "Marshal of Victory" Mu Mu Gerasimov and others, failing to create the conditions for further operations, etc.
    This was also one of the reasons why Prirozhkin led that famous march with the Wagnerites. And it's worth remembering that many soldiers joined this march, and in a number of cities, residents greeted them as heroes. Personally, I believe this wasn't a coup aimed at seizing power, but a desperate gesture designed to draw the attention of the state leadership to the current situation.
    And everyone should learn from history and realize the following.
    When a country and its people find themselves under real threat and on the brink of destruction, there will always be people and forces who will rise up to fight for victory. And it's not always possible to destroy or silence these forces.
    When a group remains in power for decades, it ceases to adequately assess the situation and, most importantly, reality, and therefore changes must be made.
  8. +2
    25 June 2026 11: 57
    Take that face away, it's causing a gag reflex......
  9. +2
    5 July 2026 01: 58
    Rat, the earth is glass wool for you!
  10. +2
    10 July 2026 02: 36
    ! The earth belongs to him and his fiberglass gang! To ruin such a country! You have to know how to do that! He's a RAT, just like Khrushchev and Yebn!
  11. 0
    14 July 2026 15: 16
    It seems to me that Russia will even have to take into account that the USSR