MAKS-2026 canceled. Flyby continues...

22 985 84
MAKS-2026 canceled. Flyby continues...

The MAKS-2026 air show has been cancelled and postponed once again. It's entirely understandable. I'm sure no one is particularly surprised by this decision, but if you look at the cause and effect, there are several significant differences.

When Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin signed an order in 2025 to hold MAKS in July-August 2026 and 2027, many air show fans already suspected that the "shift to the right" that had become commonplace in our country would continue. There were too many pros and too few cons.



MAKS has not been held since 2021. It was cancelled in 2022, and in 2023, the event was postponed to a later date—July 23–28, 2024. In 2024, the air show was cancelled, then postponed to 2025, and so on, until 2027.

Moreover, 2027 is also not an option. MAKS is planned to be held not in Zhukovsky, as usual, but in Kazan. And Gidroaviasalon will be moved to Gelendzhik.

This is also a rather poor decision, since neither Kazan nor Gelendzhik guarantee security from the actions of the Ukrainians. dronesBut it's not just that, oddly enough. While the Tupolev capital of Kazan is more or less suitable as a venue for a show of this caliber, Gelendzhik in the height of the summer season is downright stupid.

After all, some time ago, MAKS was the largest aviation exhibition not only in Russia but also in all of Eastern Europe, with hundreds of thousands of visitors attracted by both the latest aircraft and performances by the best aerobatic teams. And not just ours.


The air show was first held in 1993. It was, of course, a breakthrough event. The Su-35 and Ka-50 were the headliners. In the civilian sector, the cargo versions of the Tu-204, Il-96M, and An-74T were premieres.

This set was more than enough for MAKS to establish itself as a serious event.


Around 150 aircraft were on display at MAKS-1995. The public debut included the Il-76MF with PS-90A engines, the Tu-334 medium-range passenger jet, the advanced Ka-62 multirole helicopter, and the Ka-226 multirole helicopter.

The MAKS-1997 air show was remembered by spectators for the first demonstration of the Raduga D2 hypersonic flying laboratory based on aviation missiles The second new development was a prototype of the Kh-90 cruise missile. Among the helicopter achievements, the audience was shown a prototype of the Aktai ultralight helicopter, manufactured by the Kazan Helicopter Plant.

The highlight of the MAKS-1999 air show was the experimental S-37 Berkut fighter.


The forward-swept-wing aircraft immediately attracted public interest, becoming a major attraction at the air show, and, needless to say, it is still occasionally mentioned in publications today.

And then the landing glide began.

MAKS-2001 was truly international: 537 companies from 34 countries attended. A total of about 150 aircraft models were on display during the exhibition, but this time there were no new models. The Berkut was once again the main exhibit, but its designation had changed from the S-37 to the Su-47.

MAKS-2003. Once again, no new products, but a huge array of foreign technology. Over 60 foreign-made aircraft were on display, and the air show was truly spectacular. In addition to the Russian Knights and Swifts, the Patrouille de France (France) and Frecce Tricolori (Italy) aerobatic teams also performed.


MAKS-2005. There were some new products, but… We never saw the An-148 short-range aircraft in action, and the mockup of the Clipper manned spacecraft remained just that, a mockup. So the only real innovation was the Ansat-2RC multi-purpose light helicopter (reconnaissance and target designator), which, for better or worse, eventually went into production and even acquired a domestically produced VK-800 engine.


The Clipper that never became a ship

MAKS-2007. The S-400 anti-aircraft missile system, the short-range Sukhoi Superjet 100, and the new Su-34 bomber were shown for the first time.

Not only did MAKS-2009 lack any new products, but the exhibition was also marred by a tragedy that occurred the day before the opening. Igor Tkachenko, commander of the Russian Knights aerobatic team, died while preparing for the air show.

MAKS-2011. The tenth anniversary air show once again set a record for the number of participants. 842 companies attended the exhibition, including 220 international companies from 40 countries. The main new product was the Russian fifth-generation T-50 fighter.

MAKS-2013. The Yak-130 combat trainer, the Tu-214ON aerial surveillance aircraft, and the Mi-171A2 civilian transport helicopter were shown for the first time.

MAKS-2015. The main new arrival was the SuperJet 100. In addition, the Airbus A350 also took part in MAKS for the first time.

MAKS-2017. 827 companies from 33 countries participated. The MiG-35 multirole frontline fighter, the MS-21 short- and medium-range aircraft, and the experimental prototype of the Mi-171A2 medium-class multirole helicopter were on display.

MAKS-2019 brought together 827 participants from 33 countries, including 184 international companies. The CR929, a joint Chinese-Russian project, debuted at the air show.

The final show featured a prototype of the medium-range MS-21-300 aircraft, a medium-range Mi-38 helicopter, and fifth-generation Su-57 fighter jets taking to the skies over Zhukovsky.

MAKS-2021. Of course, the pandemic ruined it. Only 135 participants attended the six-day event. Premieres included the Su-75 prototype, the MS-21-310 airliner with domestic PD-14 engines, and a mockup of the heavy attack aircraft. drone S-70 "Hunter".

And that's it story The MAKS air show has been stopped or paused for now.

In an interview with Daily Storm in 2024, Roman Gusarov, editor-in-chief of Avia.ru, and Oleg Panteleev, executive director of the Aviaport agency, stated that MAKS could take place after the conclusion of the SVO. The experts concluded that, under the current circumstances, the event is not urgently needed for either industrialists or the general public.

And if the experts were wrong to sign for the viewers, then the industry really has nothing to brag about.

Why do they hold such events at all? Clearly, to showcase themselves and to see others. The point of any air show is to showcase new products aimed at potential buyers. If they don't have their own new products, then foreign companies will be competing for customers.

The series of postponements, despite assurances from Rostec State Corporation (whose representatives stated that all signed participation agreements remained valid until the next airshow), will have a most negative impact. In theory, because in practice, participation by foreign manufacturers from Europe and the Americas is highly questionable after 2022. This represents approximately 80% of the world's aircraft manufacturers.

Our guys don't have much to show. If you look at the list of MAKS premieres, everything is more or less fine in the military sector, but in the civilian sector...

Tu-204, Tu-334, An-74, An-146, Il-112V, SSJ-100, MS-21—they either don't exist at all, or are more likely to exist than not. And then there are military aviation shows and exhibitions, where representatives from ministries and agencies come specifically to select and conclude contracts for the supply of specific products.

And, perhaps, the most pressing question: will MAKS take place in 2027?

The exhibition's fate will likely once again depend on the situation in the country. In other words, no, it won't happen. And what might happen can only be described as a dismal show.

Can our Rostec exhibit new products? No. Old, Soviet-era aircraft can't be mass-produced here, so what new products are we talking about?

It's scary to even imagine what's going on inside Roscosmos. Compared to our former space agency, Rostec is doing quite well; at least they're fulfilling their state defense orders, producing military equipment, and sending it to the front. Meanwhile, in the space industry, all one could imagine are mockups and blueprints like the Mars and Venus projects.

The whole problem is that you can only display your own military equipment at home when people come to see it and buy it. And in China, it must be said, ours presented ours very well, and the whole world took note. And in Abu Dhabi, everything was also at a good level.


But there was plenty to see in Saudi Arabia and China without us. The entire world flocked there, but who would fly and travel to Russia to participate in MAKS was a question mark. A country at war, with half its territory under attack, is not the best place for an exhibition.

Boeing won't be coming. Airbus won't be coming. Dozens of companies working with these giants won't be coming. And they don't have anything of their own to show.

The problem isn't just security, although security is a major issue. Kyiv's attacks on St. Petersburg and Kronstadt during the SPIEF highlighted this very clearly. The problem is that it's harder to show everything because there's nothing to show.

Russian civil aviation is living under a regime of total sanctions, a failed import substitution program, and promises of "it'll be flying soon, just a little more time and a little more money." But in reality, it can't even taxi to the runway, let alone take off.

Overall, it's a shame, of course. MAKS was a truly wonderful air show, beautifully and intelligently conducted. "Intelligent" isn't like the now-defunct "ARMY-..." forum, where developers were pressured into participating in every possible way and weren't always asked whether they wanted to. You'd better prepare at least four new developments for the next forum, otherwise we guarantee a shower of stars. This is something people from the Zhukovsky and Gagarin Academy once complained about.

But MAKS wasn't run by the military, so things were a bit more relaxed; every two years, it was possible to find the right exhibit. How was MAKS conceived back in 1992? As a symbol of a powerful aerospace nation with something to show the world. And selling it was also a significant factor. I'd say it was a showcase for two giants—the aviation and space industries, capable of solving a wide variety of problems, from training aircraft for budding cadets to reusable spacecraft.

Today, alas, the Russian system is trying its best to portray itself as an "aviation and space" power, but the showcase is completely empty, and there is nothing to fill it with except mock-ups.

Russia flies patched-up Boeings and Airbuses, with no chance of switching to Tupolevs, Yakovlevs, or Ilyushins. Satellites and ships are launched into space on rockets created by the cohort of the great Korolev's great allies, and the ships themselves were created by the same people. And all these Clippers, Argos, Orlys, and Federations are roughly in the same league as civil aviation.

What can we say if there's nothing to replace the hard-working An-2, and a great aviation country lacks the capabilities, then what can we say about replacing the cohort of aircraft built by the Antonov Design Bureau? The An-24, An-26, An-72, An-146, and so on down the list?

Because it's one thing to talk about technical, and most importantly, technological sovereignty on television, and quite another to demonstrate this sovereignty in metal at an international air show. Flying.

So, MAKS's latest postponement is simply a step toward history. When there's nothing to show, no one needs an air show. Aerobatic displays could easily be scheduled for Aviation Day.

What's left are cartoons, videos, and pictures. And everything for that already exists—there's such a thing as an online project called eMAKS (aviasalon.com). As they write there, eMAKS is primarily aimed at promoting domestic aviation, and since it (civil aviation) exists in the virtual world, it's a virtual air show for you.

And we'll still be buying tickets on Boeings and flying to the lands of our dreams. MAKS didn't make it...
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 45
    17 June 2026 04: 52
    A logical end to bragging and dreaming up new ideas.
    And how well it began ... crying
    1. + 25
      17 June 2026 05: 16
      And then the landing glide began.

      A clear demonstration of the degradation of the domestic aviation industry...
      1. + 20
        17 June 2026 06: 41
        Max - as the final collapse of the Soviet aircraft industry approached its end. am
    2. + 14
      17 June 2026 11: 01
      "And how well it started..."
      The Max is a tank biathlon, only in the air. Unbridled visionary thinking and boundless puffing up of the cheeks. Which of the Max-produced aircraft over the years have actually gone into production and carried passengers and cargo? That's right, none. laughing
      1. + 16
        17 June 2026 13: 50
        The Tu-334 was making powerful turns in 2001/03, and surprisingly quietly. But Gref said we didn't need it, and some said we deliberately destroyed certain industries to show off our bourgeois credentials. But that, of course, was a coincidence. Incidentally, Gref is now overseeing import substitution in aviation again.
        1. +3
          18 June 2026 02: 12
          "You're saying something terrifying. You're proposing to essentially hand over power to the people," Gref warned the participants of the SPIEF discussion. "Once ordinary people understand the core of their identity and self-identify, it will be extremely difficult to govern, or, in other words, manipulate, them."
          People don't want to be manipulated when they have knowledge, he stated.
          Of particular concern to the head of Sberbank is a society where "everyone has equal access to information."
          "How can we live and govern a society where everyone has the opportunity to judge directly, to receive unprepared information, not through government-trained analysts, political scientists, and the vast media machines unleashed on us, which are supposedly independent, but in reality, we understand that all media are busy preserving strata?" Gref stated.
        2. 0
          21 June 2026 12: 01
          "Wow! These are all familiar faces!" And the Supreme Commander will probably reappoint Nabiullina for the fourth time!!!
    3. 0
      18 June 2026 02: 23
      In the fall, Putin ordered the acceleration of Baikal production, but the delivery dates were pushed back to 2026, citing the transition to domestic components. The Ministry of Industry and Trade stated that work on the project is continuing.
      "You know that we were working on developing the Baikal small aircraft. It has now reached a dead end. That means we don't expect to see the Baikal aircraft," TASS quotes Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Trutnev as saying.
      Checkmate...
    4. +1
      18 June 2026 08: 00
      But a similarly large and significant exhibition, ILA 2026, took place in Berlin. It's a shame and confusing. am
  2. +1
    17 June 2026 05: 01
    Here, old, Soviet-era aircraft can't be mass-produced, so what new products can we talk about?
    Apparently, they were planning to launch the Su-75 for its maiden flight this year. At least, a lot was written about it.
    1. +7
      17 June 2026 11: 08
      "It seems they were planning to launch the Su-75 on its maiden flight this year."
      The key word is "like." A training aircraft, and if necessary, a light fighter, but even that isn't what they're qualified for, as they say in Newspeak these days. laughing
      1. +1
        18 June 2026 00: 24
        Quote: ZloyKot
        Su-75 "
        the key word is like. a training airplane,

        laughing Are you sure it's "educational"?
        fool Definitely the lightest?
        Quote: ZloyKot
        and there is not enough competence for this

        lol There was enough for the Su-57M-1 and Su-57D, but not enough for a single-engine one?

        The airframe is being redesigned to accommodate a new (more powerful) engine, a new tail unit, and likely new avionics and radar. There's no rush, and it's been positioned primarily as an export product. The Ministry of Defense hasn't yet announced any intention to purchase it. It's only been in development for a few years, and it still has a long way to go in testing and refinement. It won't be in production before the early 30s, no matter what Manturov says.
    2. +2
      18 June 2026 00: 15
      Quote: Schneeberg
      It seems they were planning to launch the Su-75 on its maiden flight this year.

      They promised it at the end of last year, then at the beginning of this year. But now they're redesigning the airframe, making changes, and it looks like it'll have a new engine. Instead of the original AL-41F-1S, it will be the "Izdeliye-177" (16,000 kgf) or the AL-51F-1 (17,500 kgf). So it won't fly before the end of this year.
      However, the two-seat Su-57D and the upgraded Su-57M-1 are already flying, featuring AL-51F-1 engines, a new airborne radar and avionics suite, and a more capacious weapons bay. The fully domestically produced Ansat and Ka-226 helicopters, with domestic engines and avionics, have already taken off. So, there would certainly be something new to show off, but there's a war going on, and the last thing we needed was the Sumerian drone strikes on the MAKS, like what happened to St. Petersburg at the SPIEF.
  3. -20
    17 June 2026 05: 06
    Ultimatum! 24 hours to evacuate Kiev! Then a flood and so on down the list! Kharkiv, Lviv, and for all three days! The end!
    1. + 13
      17 June 2026 05: 17
      Quote: ose4kinsura
      Ultimatum! 24 hours to evacuate Kueva!

      And if they don’t evacuate, then what? wassat
      1. + 15
        17 June 2026 06: 10
        We'll take out a marker and declare this the last, the very last, well, the very last warning, and so on, and then after a while we'll pretend we never said anything, that you were all imagining things. And anyway, everything is going according to plan, because that's how our "strategic genius" intended it.
      2. +3
        17 June 2026 09: 35
        """"""""""""""""
      3. +4
        17 June 2026 13: 52
        And if they don’t evacuate, then nothing! request
    2. + 10
      17 June 2026 11: 10
      "Ultimatum! 24 hours to evacuate Kueva! Then a flood, and so on down the list."
      What kind of strong stuff are you drinking this morning? And I want laughing
  4. -26
    17 June 2026 05: 18
    The author of the text presents subjective despondency as objective analysis, replacing professional expertise with journalistic cliches. Instead of an impartial analysis of the reasons for the postponement (logistics, insurance risks, sanctions restrictions), he paints an apocalyptic picture of an "empty shop window," appealing to emotions ("nothing to brag about," "a dreary show"). Particularly absurd is the attempt to link the cancellation of the air show with hypothetical drone attacks on Kazan and Gelendzhik—even though both cities are located deep in the rear, and their airfields have different infrastructure than Zhukovsky. Such passages are reminiscent of journalistic writing from the 1990s, where any government decision was presented as a systemic collapse, without taking into account real market and production cycles.

    The author deliberately confuses two different issues: the lack of a mass aviation industry (which is truly painful) and the very rationale for holding MAKS in a context of global isolation. He forgets that the key function of any air show is B2B contracts and technology demonstrations for partners, not for the general public. Boeing and Airbus' participation is impossible for political reasons, but this doesn't equate to a "lack of innovation"—it's enough to recall that the most recent MAKS shows featured the Su-57 and MS-21, which the critic dismissively calls "patched-up." Civil aviation is indeed struggling due to engine issues, but military developments (like the S-70 Okhotnik) are still in place, and presenting them to friendly countries (China, India, and the Middle East) would make sense, something the author stubbornly ignores.

    The critic waxes nostalgic about the MAKS air shows of the 1990s, idealizing them as "breakthroughs," but forgets that half the exhibits back then were mockups (like the Clipper) or repainted Soviet prototypes. He derides eMAKS as a "virtual salon," failing to understand that in the era of sanctions, digital platforms are the only way to conduct negotiations without risking the prototypes. The strangest thing is the criticism leveled at the An-2: replacing this biplane is not a marker of a nation's greatness, and comparing delays in the civilian sector to the complete collapse of space exploration (even though the Angara is still flying and the ISS is being supplied) is blatantly manipulative. The text is not an analysis, but an elegy on the theme of "all is lost," where rhetorical pathos obscures the main point: MAKS was canceled not because "there's nothing to show," but because its old Western audience has left, and a new, friendly one demands different formats and locations. This is a management decision.
    1. + 21
      17 June 2026 05: 50
      Quote: bya965
      He paints an apocalyptic picture of an "empty shop window" appealing to emotions

      The storefront remains empty right now. Of the thousand civilian aircraft promised, only five have been built so far. How's that for an achievement?

      So emotions have nothing to do with it. And judging by the writing style, your long, drawn-out piece of jibberish was generated by artificial intelligence.
      1. -4
        17 June 2026 17: 32
        Quote: Stas157
        Judging by the writing style, your long piece of writing was generated by artificial intelligence.

        Five civilian airliners against the promised thousands is a failure, and there's nothing to deny. However, my criticism wasn't about the numbers, but about the author's flawed logic, who attributed the cancellation of the air show solely to "an empty showcase," ignoring the real reasons (safety, sanctions against Western companies, and cost savings). Your remark about AI is a convenient, but misguided, ploy to avoid a substantive debate, since the crux of the discussion isn't about the author of the text, but about why MAKS is truly no longer needed in its old format.
        So if you can't wind a long footcloth (it's harder to wind one closer to a square one, I know, I've done it myself), then that's your problem, not my homeland's and country's.
      2. -8
        17 June 2026 18: 21
        Quote: Stas157
        Of the thousand promised civilian aircraft, only five have been built so far. How's that for an achievement?

        Aviation development costs money, and quite a bit of it. Today, the emphasis is on war. And so, to prevent local writers who bury Russia's aviation in various media outlets from fleeing to Kazakhstan and other Georgian countries to avoid mobilization agendas, the President is increasing the contract money for those who are going to fight themselves. And it doesn't matter who uses artificial intelligence or how; understanding the situation is crucial. Yes, there's not enough money for many things we'd like. Today, we're in a "besieged fortress." Only potential traitors make fun of the difficulties of their own country. I think the author's "empty storefront" is far from the apocalypse. The apocalypse is NATO units near Moscow. We'll survive the rest, especially without the "500s."
      3. +1
        18 June 2026 01: 28
        Quote: Stas157
        Of the thousand promised civil aircraft, only five have been built so far.

        Did anyone believe in this "thousand"? Mentally healthy people with at least a secondary education? You probably believed the "Kyiv in 3 days" thing, too? Manturov is an ECOLOGIST by training, meaning he's a completely incompetent person in a high-ranking position; his words carry almost nothing but negative weight.
        Quote: Stas157
        There is an empty display case

        And in China, India, and Abu Dhabi, it was far from empty. Last year. And how is that possible? We have a long waiting list for combat aircraft, the Ansat and Ka-226 have finally appeared in fully domestic configuration, the Il-114 has been certified and serial production has begun, the MS-21-310 and SSZh-100 in fully domestic configuration are finishing certification, and already 20+ units of both types are standing in workshops and at test stations, awaiting the completion of the certification flight plan. During factory tests, the first production MS-21-310 demonstrated characteristics above expectations, those demonstrated by prototypes – 5% in fuel efficiency, and 15-20% lower in cabin noise than its classmates Boeing and Airbus, the latest models. So there is definitely something to show. Moreover, exhibitions typically showcase promising prototypes; that's what such exhibitions and salons are for. And not all prototypes make it to production. But my colleague is right—MAKS is pointless today, not only because of the risk of terrorist attacks and air strikes, but also because of the high cost and insurance risks.
        Quote: Stas157
        thousands of promised civil aircraft

        But combat and military aircraft are being produced at a Stakhanovite pace. 126 heavy fighters last year. Only heavy ones. And how many does the entire Euro-NATO produce per year? Their own light ones? And we're already expecting around 140 heavy ones this year. And we're building helicopters—the best in their classes—and they're being exported again. Two new modifications: the Su-57D (two-seater) and the Su-57M-1 (new second-stage engines, new gallium nitride AESA airborne radar systems, a new electronic warfare system, a wider and more capacious weapons bay, and a new, more effective radar-absorbing coating). The S-70 Okhotnik has already been built in pilot production, and is in trial operation. The Su-75 is on the way (its test flight start was postponed due to the airframe being redesigned to accommodate a new, more powerful engine, a new tail unit, and updated avionics suite). Both the manned and unmanned versions of this lightweight, single-engine, fifth-generation multi-role aircraft have been rolled out. So, had conditions been met for MAKS, there would have been plenty to showcase, including the full production cycle of all components for domestic passenger airliners, which required the revival or re-creation of hundreds of enterprises. And the aircraft are already flying – undergoing certification and factory testing.
        There's plenty to show in terms of aircraft engines, too: the PD-14 and PD-8 are fully operational and flying, the PD-35 is completing its bench testing cycle and is being prepared for flight testing on a flying laboratory, and work has begun on its backlog of the PD-26 (for the PAK DA, An-124, MS-21-500, and a promising super-heavy transport aircraft) and the PD-28 (a promising long-range engine from the Tupolev Design Bureau). There would be plenty to show, but there's no time. The war is on.
    2. + 17
      17 June 2026 06: 24
      People like you can always explain that hanging is better than standing.
    3. + 11
      17 June 2026 10: 30
      Quote: bya965
      Angara is flying

      Are you talking about the "A5"? It flies. But how often? Don't remind us how many times this epochal event has happened in 12 years?
      What's there to brag about? Nearly three decades of development? A price tag that's higher than even its predecessor, the Proton? An outdated modular concept? Low μPN efficiency in LEO? A lack of market demand? The fact that the product hasn't yet left the flight testing facility? Or the fact that the A5 still isn't being used for military purposes (for which, in fact, it was designed) in the required volume?
      The main indicator of a rocket's success isn't its existence, but regular flights. There are no achievements in this regard. And no reason to be proud.
      Quote: bya965
      ...and the ISS is supplied

      You forgot to add - not only by us anymore, since Russia's monopoly on supplying the ISS has been lost.
      And again - what will we exhibit at MAKS? The Soyuz MS? With its venerable age, it's almost six decades (even if in a digital version with modern electronics)? Or "Progress MS" with age almost five decades?
      Are you proposing to surprise the world with these devices at MAKS?
    4. +6
      17 June 2026 11: 11
      "Kazan and Gelendzhik – despite the fact that both cities are located deep in the rear."
      Tuapse seems to be further back than Gelendzhik, which doesn't bother me at all
    5. -2
      17 June 2026 11: 19
      "The latest MAKS shows featured the Su-57 and MS-21, which the critic derogatorily calls "patched-up and re-patched"
      Learn to read and understand what you read - "MAKS-2011 The main new product was the Russian fifth-generation fighter T-50."
      "Russia flies on patched-up Boeings and Airbusesx"" where is it about "Su-57 and MS-21"
    6. +5
      17 June 2026 11: 35
      "The author deliberately confuses two different issues: the lack of a mass aviation industry (which is truly painful) and the very feasibility of holding MAKS."
      So Max was created to showcase the achievements of the aviation industry? If there are no achievements, then Max is not needed. It's cheaper to show mockups and cartoons online than to give every real visitor a TV.
    7. Eug
      +1
      17 June 2026 14: 41
      Moreover, Gelendzhik has already hosted exhibitions on helicopter and seaplane topics and everything went very well
  5. + 18
    17 June 2026 05: 19
    If you think "a great aviation country lacks opportunities," what a disaster. But we have "the most brilliant and democratic president of all time" and his "crew" (mostly former "St. Petersburgers"). And this gives us a vast advantage over the rest of the world! All that remains is to deal with this "misunderstanding" with Ukraine. The Ukrainians just won't understand that they "want the best." They just don't understand that Usmanov, Rotenberg, Potanin, and Mordashov are better than Poroshenko, Kolomoisky, and Akhmetov, if only because they're "friends and family."
    1. + 12
      17 June 2026 06: 00
      Quote: fiberboard
      but we have "the most brilliant and democratic president"

      Not oil and gas (or various aviation exhibitions)... Our achievement is Putin! And that can't be taken away from us!
      1. +9
        17 June 2026 11: 21
        "and oil and gas (and various air shows)... Our achievement is Putin! And that can't be taken away from us.!"
        Unfortunately laughing
  6. +8
    17 June 2026 05: 42
    eMAKS is aimed at popularizing domestic aviation, and since it (civil) exists in the virtual world, here you have it virtual air show.

    For the looking glass, it's just right. Ideal. Nothing better.
  7. + 15
    17 June 2026 06: 18
    But everything is not so bad in our kingdom.
    The number of billionaires is growing steadily year after year. The process continues without a hitch or interruption.
  8. -22
    17 June 2026 06: 18
    "The plane didn't take off—Putin failed." I suggest looking for negative signs reflecting the commander-in-chief's personality at school Olympiads, crane operator competitions, and hairdressing competitions. Why is it just an air show?))) He's already single-handedly responsible for the country's birth rate, no doubt about it. "If someone couldn't give birth, it was Putin who failed to help." laughing
    1. + 32
      17 June 2026 06: 36
      Well, yes, Trump raised the retirement age. Zelensky is bringing in migrants. Macron is raising prices at Auchan. Biden is preventing the bombing of bridges in Ukraine. Kallas banned the construction of drone and missile factories.
      1. -10
        17 June 2026 12: 30
        Well, there you have it! I'm telling you that the reality of the universe consists only of what Putin does and what "smart people" find out or guess about it. Cause-and-effect relationships? No way.
  9. + 13
    17 June 2026 06: 20
    Well, what should we put on display at the exhibition?
    The Il-114 – a thirty-year-old aircraft modernized? Yes, it's still a good plane. It's a legacy worth being proud of!
    Superjet? A good airplane for an exhibition 11 years ago. At the time, it had arguably the best performance (compared to its classmates). And it was in production back then.
    The MS-21? Let's be serious. If Boeing or Airbus had shown their aircraft at an exhibition in this condition—overweight and with a reduced range, worse than the archaic Chinese metal-winged aircraft (the C919)—everyone would have called it a complete failure. But here they're throwing their hats in the air! I hope that eventually the MS-21 will be fully developed and its former range restored. Then we can go to the exhibition.
    1. + 17
      17 June 2026 06: 40
      We have Manturov and Alikhanov. But we have no new or production aircraft. But we have Manturov and Alikhanov.
      1. Eug
        0
        17 June 2026 14: 45
        If you're curious, Google the maiden name of Poroshenko's eldest son's wife. Coincidence?
      2. +1
        18 June 2026 02: 26
        Aren't they Heroes of Russia by any chance?
    2. +3
      17 June 2026 08: 19
      Quote: Stas157
      and return it to its previous range.

      This range was only on paper.
    3. +4
      17 June 2026 11: 23
      "Then we can go to the exhibition."
      Maybe it would be better to put it into series production and into airports?
  10. -20
    17 June 2026 06: 27
    Quote: Stas157
    So emotions have nothing to do with it. And judging by the writing style, your long, drawn-out piece of jibberish was generated by artificial intelligence.

    What's got you so pissed off? As always, though. Who even created you—the "Berlin Patient"?
    1. + 10
      17 June 2026 06: 42
      Quote: Tagan
      Why are you so angry?

      I can't beat you in this regard. Especially in toilet vocabulary!
      1. -16
        17 June 2026 07: 22
        I can't beat you in this regard. Especially in toilet vocabulary!

        Applicable to your environment and the corresponding vocabulary. You still won't understand it as a human being.
        1. + 12
          17 June 2026 08: 17
          Quote: Tagan
          Applicable to your habitat and the corresponding vocabulary.

          How pathetic you are. Your vocabulary was born precisely from your environment, and you use it with pleasure. It's hard for the guardians to find other arguments.
          1. -17
            17 June 2026 08: 29
            How pathetic you are. Your vocabulary was born precisely from your environment, and you use it with pleasure. It's hard for the guardians to find other arguments.

            You see, all that's left is to parrot. A manual doesn't really help with the thought process, does it?
            Well, what else can you expect from experienced Navalny supporters who have lost their ideological inspiration?
  11. + 16
    17 June 2026 06: 28
    In the 90s, this was still a Soviet air show. Soviet developments. And in the 2000s, as we all see, the sawyers came. It's good to do. But why?
  12. D16
    -1
    17 June 2026 07: 03
    If Skomorokhov is willing to pay for a clearly unprofitable event, then go for it. Exhibitions are held with funds collected from participants. Failing that, all hope lies with the author of this article.
    1. Alf
      -1
      17 June 2026 17: 08
      Hello !
      Quote: D16
      Exhibitions are held with money collected from participants.

      Why aren't there any participants? I brought Helldiver last week, but six months ago I didn't bring anything. Why do you think that is? Maybe there was nothing to brag about six months ago?
      1. D16
        0
        17 June 2026 20: 44
        Are you ready to rent an airfield in Zhukovsky for the presentation of this Helldiver? laughing
        MAKS was paid for by the exhibitors. Now they're almost gone. There's no money to be made. The exhibition has lost its main clients, and the Chinese aren't interested for obvious reasons.
  13. -6
    17 June 2026 07: 54
    As someone who has attended four MAKS air shows, in 2009, 2011, 2013, and 2021, I can say that we need an air show like this!
    Especially for a country like Russia! It would be a shame if we didn't have this showcase of achievements.
    It's clear that we really don't have much to be proud of right now. There are no new developments, except for significant advances in unmanned aircraft. Incidentally, at the last MAKS air show in 2021, many new UAV innovations were presented. Of course, they're now five years out of date... drones evolve much faster.
    Well, as for Roscosmos... it's better not to say anything, everyone already understands what's going on there.
    But... let's not despair...
    MAKS should happen, maybe it will take on some new form, hopefully not just a virtual one. Maybe not in '27, but definitely in '29. Maybe there'll be something to show by then...
    Wait and see
    1. +2
      17 June 2026 09: 21
      IMHO it is better to move it to an even year.
      There he will compete with the local ILA and Farnborough, and on odd days he will face the mastodon Le Bourget.
      They say (tm) that MAKS was set for 1993 for a reason, but at the instigation of German consultants, and this cannot be explained by anything other than malicious intent.
    2. +3
      17 June 2026 11: 26
      "Maybe not in '27, but definitely in '29. Maybe there'll be something to show by then."
      Maybe they'll even show Lake Baikal laughing
      1. Alf
        +4
        17 June 2026 17: 10
        Quote: ZloyKot
        Maybe they'll even show Lake Baikal

        And not in the picture. Oh, to dream, so dream...
    3. +9
      17 June 2026 12: 11
      Quote: Roman Bubnov
      As someone who has attended four MAKS air shows, in 2009, 2011, 2013, and 2021, I can say that we need an air show like this!
      Especially for a country like Russia! It would be a shame if we didn't have this showcase of achievements.

      Take off your rose-colored glasses already. It's just a showcase, no achievements!
  14. + 11
    17 June 2026 08: 27
    A time when salons, exhibitions and forums replace industry in the real sector of the economy.
    1. +8
      17 June 2026 11: 28
      "A time when salons, exhibitions and forums replace industry in the real sector of the economy."
      In the land of pink ponies it's always like this
  15. +6
    17 June 2026 08: 44
    MAKS may take place after the completion of the SVO

    That is, almost never.
  16. 0
    17 June 2026 09: 19
    I've been to almost every MAKS air show—the salon has evolved and matured with each successive edition. There have always been new products, but the media coverage varies. By 2019 (my last visit), everything was already world-class. MAKS was particularly impressive for its flight program—it was truly spectacular. Furthermore, there were so many aircraft on the static display that just walking around took a couple of hours. So, the author is being unreasonable; his article doesn't reflect reality, but rather sounds like a child's cry for a lost toy. Holding an air show during a war is stupid, so the cancellations are justified. But the idea of ​​moving MAKS to Kubinka, voiced in 2021, is utter nonsense and sabotage. I hope it doesn't happen. Well, and
    While MAX is in suspended animation, we'll wait.
  17. +9
    17 June 2026 10: 53
    The author is right or wrong, exaggerating or not...

    The money ran out, and the PR clowns ran away
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. + 10
    17 June 2026 12: 03
    Quote: avia12005
    We have Manturov and Alikhanov. But we have no new or production aircraft. But we have Manturov and Alikhanov.

    Chemezov is also here!
    1. Alf
      +6
      17 June 2026 17: 12
      Quote: moreman78
      Quote: avia12005
      We have Manturov and Alikhanov. But we have no new or production aircraft. But we have Manturov and Alikhanov.

      Chemezov is also here!

      And the Reserve General Command Dmitry Anatolyevich will also join in.
  20. +1
    17 June 2026 15: 04
    And then the landing glide began

    My opinion is that, despite the statements of the media and responsible people, there was no takeoff in principle.
    The air show was first held in 1993.

    Su-35 and Ka-50, Tu-204, Il-96M and An-74T

    And of all these, the only one currently available is the Su-35, which, by the way, was accepted into service almost 20 years after this public presentation. And yes, I know that "the Su-35 then and now are two different aircraft." But making improvements and creating new variants during serial production is a natural process. So this is not a reason for delaying production.
    The Ka-50 helicopter was also in serial production. However, the result: only 20 aircraft were decommissioned.
    MAKS-1995

    Il-76MF

    Despite promises of serial production in the early 2s, only two aircraft were assembled, and those were for Jordan.
    Tu-334

    And where is he?
    Ka-62

    Where is he?(2)
    Ka-226

    This one was in production. What about now? The plan was to assemble the Ka-226. By 2030. One example.
    Rainbow D2

    Not something critically needed, but where is she?(3)
    X-90

    Where is she?(4)
    Aktai

    Where is he?(5)
    experimental fighter S-37 "Berkut"

    Which, at the time of its introduction, did not stop the press and others from calling it both "the best fighter" and "the fifth generation aircraft" (also the best).
    The situation with it is actually quite strange. If the problem was with the reverse-glare wing, then what prevented them from replacing it with a conventional one? It's still an experimental aircraft, after all.
    MAKS-2005

    An-148

    It was in mass production, but now it's not. There's no replacement or equivalent for it, either.
    "Clipper"

    Well, the author wrote about him.
    Ansat-2RC

    The author confused Ansat 1 and 2. Ansat 1 was indeed in serial production, in various modifications, but with a non-domestic engine (and not only). Regarding the version with a Russian engine, there is information about the first flight in 2025 with the VK-650V. I don't know why the author mentioned the VK-800.
    As for the Ansat-2RC, it was never put into serial production, despite the author's claims to the contrary.
    MAKS-2007

    new Su-34 bomber

    It's worth noting that the aircraft, under its export designation, had already been shown at Le Bourget 12 (!) years earlier. Its maiden flight, in fact, took place in 1990. This means the aircraft was accepted into service in 2014, 24 years after its maiden flight (work on it, of course, had begun even earlier).
    MAKS-2015

    The main new product is the SuperJet 100

    Which, at that point, had already been in mass production for several years. Well, it was new, but not really new.
    MAKS-2017

    MiG-35

    Not only was the aircraft 20 years late, but again, only 6 aircraft were built for the Russian Aerospace Forces, and those were in test operation.
    In fact, this aircraft could be sold to North Korea if they have the money to pay for it, considering they already have the MiG-29 but no Su-27 family aircraft. Given their geography, the combat range disadvantage isn't that significant for them. And given their lack of options, no one but Russia will sell them aircraft. But I think if deliveries do happen, it will certainly be the Su-27 and its variants.
    MAKS-2019

    CR929

    As far as I understand, they mean a model, since this aircraft still doesn't exist. However, a mockup was already unveiled at Le Bourget in 2017.
    Mi-38

    It was unveiled back in 1989 at Le Bourget. It's clear that there was a model back then, but again, the timeframe is simply enormous.
    MAKS-2021

    Su-75

    Despite the author's words, a model was presented at that time, and assembly of the prototype began only this year.
    S-70 "Hunter"

    The first flight took place two years earlier. It's unclear why a mockup was displayed at the exhibition.
    Well, despite the announcements about plans for serial production in the second half of 2024, it’s already 2026 and it’s still not here.
    1. 0
      17 June 2026 19: 37
      If we recall the state of the entire aviation industry in the "independent, democratic Russian Federation," then all these timeframes will not come as a surprise.
      Another thing is that under the new leadership, the civilian aviation industry wasn't revived, but rather crushed: "We'll sell the oil and gas and buy everything we need." So now we're all gorging ourselves from a ladle. And the Kremlin's people aren't getting any of it.
    2. 0
      18 June 2026 13: 05
      A huge comment, but it missed an important detail: in the 90s and later, a trend toward international cooperation emerged. The An-148, for example, has Ukrainian engines, the Ka-226 has French ones. Even the Tu-214 has some imported components. Now, all of this is being imported, and that's a long and difficult process. All the world's aircraft manufacturers are participating in the international division of labor and expertise. We're not given this opportunity—we have to do everything ourselves now. So, no need to cry, we can handle it...
  21. +2
    17 June 2026 16: 08
    Quote: Glagol1
    Well, while MAX is in suspended animation, we'll wait.

    Maybe we should wait for my mom?
    My dear, let's wait, your mother!
    1. 0
      18 June 2026 13: 08
      Where does all this anger towards mothers come from, user? Did you grow up without one? Hold an air show under the blows of crazed dancers? They don't spare children.
  22. +6
    17 June 2026 19: 24
    A paradox. Stalin, the "tyrant and murderer," had, in 26 years of rule, once raised the country from the ruins of the Civil War and World War II to the level of a nuclear and space power. And then, in 26 years, the complete degradation of industry and the people occurred.
  23. +3
    17 June 2026 19: 26
    Quote: ZloyKot
    "Maybe not in '27, but definitely in '29. Maybe there'll be something to show by then."
    Maybe they'll even show Lake Baikal laughing

    🤣🤣🤣🤣
  24. +1
    17 June 2026 19: 30
    Quote: sleeve
    "The plane didn't take off—Putin failed." I suggest looking for negative signs reflecting the commander-in-chief's personality at school Olympiads, crane operator competitions, and hairdressing competitions. Why is it just an air show?))) He's already single-handedly responsible for the country's birth rate, no doubt about it. "If someone couldn't give birth, it was Putin who failed to help." laughing

    He's the head of state and has been at its helm for 26 years now. So he's responsible for everything that happens in the country. Stalin didn't execute anyone himself, and Khrushchev didn't plant corn, yet they're blamed for everything.
  25. -2
    18 June 2026 03: 36
    As expected, it couldn't catch up or surpass Le Bourget. For the first 10-15 years, it really showcased new aircraft (though all of them Soviet-designed, like the Il-114, the star of the SPIEF 2026). Then, over the years, their numbers dwindled. The last few times people went, they only went to see the Su-27 and MiG-29 flight program. For that, by the way, trudging on a packed commuter train followed by an hour's walk is quite a thrill. Vityaz and Strizhi are perfectly suitable for showing off over Moscow.
    1. 0
      18 June 2026 13: 12
      You're way overreacting about the commuter train. And about the hour-long walk. I ordered a car pass for 2 rubles, drove right onto the airfield grounds, parked, went through the turnstile, and a 5-minute walk brought me to the air show. People walk to the mountains too, and it's okay. Don't make things difficult for yourself, and your life will immediately change for the better...
  26. 0
    18 June 2026 03: 42
    Quote: Kravets Vyacheslav
    And then the landing glide began

    My opinion is that, despite the statements of the media and responsible people, there was no takeoff in principle.
    The air show was first held in 1993.

    Su-35 and Ka-50, Tu-204, Il-96M and An-74T

    And of all these, the only one currently available is the Su-35, which, by the way, was accepted into service almost 20 years after this public presentation. And yes, I know that "the Su-35 then and now are two different aircraft." But making improvements and creating new variants during serial production is a natural process. So this is not a reason for delaying production.
    The Ka-50 helicopter was also in serial production. However, the result: only 20 aircraft were decommissioned.
    MAKS-1995

    Il-76MF

    Despite promises of serial production in the early 2s, only two aircraft were assembled, and those were for Jordan.
    Tu-334

    And where is he?
    Ka-62

    Where is he?(2)
    Ka-226

    This one was in production. What about now? The plan was to assemble the Ka-226. By 2030. One example.
    Rainbow D2

    Not something critically needed, but where is she?(3)
    X-90

    Where is she?(4)
    Aktai

    Where is he?(5)
    experimental fighter S-37 "Berkut"

    Which, at the time of its introduction, did not stop the press and others from calling it both "the best fighter" and "the fifth generation aircraft" (also the best).
    The situation with it is actually quite strange. If the problem was with the reverse-glare wing, then what prevented them from replacing it with a conventional one? It's still an experimental aircraft, after all.
    MAKS-2005

    An-148

    It was in mass production, but now it's not. There's no replacement or equivalent for it, either.
    "Clipper"

    Well, the author wrote about him.
    Ansat-2RC

    The author confused Ansat 1 and 2. Ansat 1 was indeed in serial production, in various modifications, but with a non-domestic engine (and not only). Regarding the version with a Russian engine, there is information about the first flight in 2025 with the VK-650V. I don't know why the author mentioned the VK-800.
    As for the Ansat-2RC, it was never put into serial production, despite the author's claims to the contrary.
    MAKS-2007

    new Su-34 bomber

    It's worth noting that the aircraft, under its export designation, had already been shown at Le Bourget 12 (!) years earlier. Its maiden flight, in fact, took place in 1990. This means the aircraft was accepted into service in 2014, 24 years after its maiden flight (work on it, of course, had begun even earlier).
    MAKS-2015

    The main new product is the SuperJet 100

    Which, at that point, had already been in mass production for several years. Well, it was new, but not really new.
    MAKS-2017

    MiG-35

    Not only was the aircraft 20 years late, but again, only 6 aircraft were built for the Russian Aerospace Forces, and those were in test operation.
    In fact, this aircraft could be sold to North Korea if they have the money to pay for it, considering they already have the MiG-29 but no Su-27 family aircraft. Given their geography, the combat range disadvantage isn't that significant for them. And given their lack of options, no one but Russia will sell them aircraft. But I think if deliveries do happen, it will certainly be the Su-27 and its variants.
    MAKS-2019

    CR929

    As far as I understand, they mean a model, since this aircraft still doesn't exist. However, a mockup was already unveiled at Le Bourget in 2017.
    Mi-38

    It was unveiled back in 1989 at Le Bourget. It's clear that there was a model back then, but again, the timeframe is simply enormous.
    MAKS-2021

    Su-75

    Despite the author's words, a model was presented at that time, and assembly of the prototype began only this year.
    S-70 "Hunter"

    The first flight took place two years earlier. It's unclear why a mockup was displayed at the exhibition.
    Well, despite the announcements about plans for serial production in the second half of 2024, it’s already 2026 and it’s still not here.

    I agree with almost everything. The Il-96 flew on routes in the mid-90s. Tu-204s from Minvody, Uralsk, and Vladivostok also flew on routes in the early 00s.
  27. +1
    18 June 2026 06: 17
    The problem is that all countries work in cooperation, and only we are forced to spend billions on creating our own planes, ships, AvtoVAZs, and chips. And we're talking about several different models at once. China, for example, prefers to fly Boeings and Airbuses. Apparently, it's cheaper that way.
  28. +2
    18 June 2026 08: 22
    authorDon't read Bandera's newspapers in the morning. What, you don't have any others? Well, then don't read any!
  29. -1
    18 June 2026 08: 58
    It's odd when Ukrainian drones interfere with a display of modern military equipment. Ideally, these drones should be there to destroy them and demonstrate their capabilities.
  30. +1
    18 June 2026 10: 16
    MAKS was conceived as a counter to England's Farnborough. Farnborough, without our help, had become depopulated and practically folded. So MAKS served its purpose.
  31. 0
    18 June 2026 15: 21
    Well, if you really want, we don't even have to hold it in Moscow. Any city would be happy to host it.
    And from Moscow, set up flights every couple of hours on a B747 with normal prices.
  32. -1
    18 June 2026 18: 19
    Quote: Glagol1
    Where does all this anger towards mothers come from, user? Did you grow up without one? Hold an air show under the blows of crazed dancers? They don't spare children.

    There's a song about that. You're so stupid... Well, you don't know it yourself - at least Google it...
  33. 0
    18 June 2026 20: 37
    Nothing terrible happens.
    Security and the inability to demonstrate anything play a decisive role.
    Meanwhile, Kyiv will host numerous international fairs and exhibitions safely in 2026. And no one will interfere.
    See https://mvc-expo.com.ua/en/exhibitions-and-actions/year_2026/
  34. 0
    20 June 2026 04: 37
    Quote: Jurkovs
    MAKS was conceived as a counter to England's Farnborough. Farnborough, without our help, had become depopulated and practically folded. So MAKS served its purpose.

    You're probably being told the lullaby of the scabsailors on the idiot box? It's obvious.