Ukraine, together with Belarus, has developed a new radar for Azerbaijan

35
It has long been no secret that Azerbaijan cooperates with the Ukrainian enterprise Iskra Research and Production Complex, a leading developer and manufacturer of ground-based radar equipment of the defense complex of Ukraine.

And now there is information that the military leadership of Azerbaijan was interested in finalizing the 80K6 circular radar with the participation of representatives of Tehnosoyuzproyekt LLC and Spetstechnoexport DGZP.



At the beginning of 2007, a new development of Zaporozhye specialists, a three-coordinate 80K6 circular radar based on a digital multipath antenna array, was adopted by the Ukrainian forces.

The radar provides detection, tracking and measurement of the three coordinates of air objects and their radial velocity at a distance of 400 km. The elevation angle is 35 degrees per antenna revolution (5 or 10 seconds). The station also has a high level of noise protection.

According to expert estimates, the characteristics of the 80K6 radar can be claimed not only by Iskra's long-term partners, but it is also possible to use the new design in the interests of NATO.

This radar interested Azerbaijan, for which a new version of the PLC 80K6M was proposed based on the Belarusian chassis Volat

The 80K6М mobile radar is intended for use as part of the radio engineering and air defense missile units of the Air Defense Forces, providing target designation to the air defense missile forces, and must provide:

• detection, tracking and measurement of three coordinates of air objects and their ground speed;
• determination of the nationality of air facilities;
• determination of elevation and azimuth bearings for active jammers;
• delivery of information to radar workplaces and associated systems.



According to reports from the official website of the manufacturer, it became known about the start of the implementation of the purchase of this type of radar:

1 to 3 September 2011g. A delegation of representatives of Tehnosoyuzproekt LLC, the Republic of Belarus, and the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Azerbaijan, accompanied by representatives of the Spetstechnoexport State Enterprise, worked at the enterprise.

During their stay at the enterprise, delegations were presented a presentation of the company's products, the 80K6 and 80К6М products, a demonstration of real work on the position of the 80К6 product with air targets, a demonstration of remote work on the 19Ж6М test site with a built-in MK-XA system requester.

Belarusian and Azerbaijani specialists received all the necessary information regarding the execution of the order, and expressed satisfaction with the results of the visit, about which a corresponding protocol was drawn up.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    24 May 2013 06: 56
    "it is possible to use the new development in the interests of NATO"

    garno work, lads.
    And before that, Azerbaijan took away the station in Gabala from Russia. Interesting conclusions suggest themselves.
    1. +18
      24 May 2013 07: 18
      Yes, what are the conclusions? These are completely different stations according to their purpose, signal characteristics, power consumption, reconnaissance radar range, etc. The traffic policeman also uses the principles of radar in speed meters, but valiant police officers do not record ballistic missile launches thousands of kilometers above the permissible ride-speed over the Arabian Peninsula and the Indian Ocean.
      1. +16
        24 May 2013 08: 08
        Quote: Aeneas
        The traffic policeman also uses the principles of radar in speed meters, but valiant police officers do not record ballistic missile launches thousands of kilometers above the permissible ride-speed over the Arabian Peninsula and the Indian Ocean.

        Oh, do not promise, a traffic policeman of level 46 still can not do this. wink
        1. gladiatorakz
          0
          24 May 2013 15: 13
          Quote: Vladimirets
          Oh, do not promise, a traffic policeman of level 46 still can not do this.

          It can only be SAM !!! Marshal GAI!
          1. Yarbay
            +1
            24 May 2013 21: 46
            Quote: gladiatorakz
            It can only be SAM !!! Marshal GAI!

            Well, if the marshal, then this one can))))))
            Designated)))
      2. +2
        24 May 2013 11: 19
        Quote: Aeneas
        but valiant police officers do not record ballistic missile launches thousands of kilometers above the permissible ride-speed over the Arabian Peninsula and the Indian Ocean.


        This is more likely due to the lack of a corresponding article in the CAO, there would be articles - there would be receipts, especially for those who drive over the Indian Ocean ...
        1. +2
          24 May 2013 12: 21
          According to expert estimates, the characteristics of the 80K6 radar can be claimed not only by Iskra's long-term partners, but it is also possible to use the new design in the interests of NATO.

          This is how secrets flow to the west. And where is the guarantee that if we sell the S-400 to Belarus, the Belarusians having studied the complex will transfer the technology from the S-400 to joint-production air defense systems for the purpose of further sale? In some year there was a scandal by the sale of Belarus S-300 to America
    2. KoRSaR1
      +2
      24 May 2013 10: 13
      In Gabala, there was junk, and it worked "well, while it works, nikhai is worth it," and the Azerbaijanis have turned down such a price that it is easier to build 3 such Gabala, especially since there is already something to replace it.
      1. Predskazamus
        0
        22 June 2013 20: 31
        it all happened because Russia sold Baku s-300 at inflated prices and did not give in. and immediately donated the same amount to Yerevan. Cuba rented an electronic center in Lourdes for $ 500 million. Gabala was just 3.))))) ))) Baku just acted in a neighborly way, which can’t be said about Moscow. And after that there were natural claims. As soon as you have the opportunity to give the sums to you then you are so kind and pay Even though not all 500 are at least 300.
    3. +2
      24 May 2013 13: 16
      That is, do you consider Azerbaijan a potential enemy? Well, then why does Russia supply arms there, by the way which then the Azerbaijani Armed Forces demonstrates in parades.

      For example:
      In 2011, between the Ministry of Defense of Azerbaijan and the Rosoboronexport company An agreement on the purchase of T-90S tanks was signed. Information about the details of the contract, the number of tanks and delivery dates were not disclosed.
      In 2006 — 2009 Russia sold 62 T-72M1 tanks to Azerbaijan, Belarus sold 2005 units to Azerbaijan in 19, in 2006 41 units of the T-72M1 tank, Ukraine in 2006 sold 48 units of the T-72AG tank to Azerbaijan.

      In 2009, Azerbaijan bought nine from Russia, In 2008, three self-propelled artillery mounts 2C7 "Peony".

      ATGM Cornet - About 100 9M133 units delivered from Russia between 2009 and 2010.

      In 2010, Russia and Azerbaijan signed a contract on the organization of licensed production of modernized Kalashnikov AK-74M assault rifles in Azerbaijan.

      Russia in 2012 delivered 16 Mi-35M helicopters to Azerbaijan. The supply of Mi-35 helicopters began in December 2011. 16 out of 24 ordered helicopters have already been delivered to Azerbaijan and put into service. It also provides for the phased delivery of the remaining 8 helicopters to Azerbaijan.

      Azerbaijan ordered 2011 Mi-40-17V helicopters in 1. Kazan Helicopter Plant will supply helicopters within 2 years.
      1. +4
        24 May 2013 16: 11
        Quote: Sith Lord
        Rosoboronexport signed an agreement on the purchase of T-90S tanks.

        What was it then about the rumors about the Turkish Altai? And in at least two years it was possible to start deliveries, despite the fact that the UVZ vet mass-produced tanks.
        1. +2
          24 May 2013 19: 39
          Quote: Kars
          What then are the rumors about the Turkish Altai?

          There was an intention to buy. Altai, for a start, must enter the Turkish army, they still have to drive it, and then it will be clear the intention will turn into a contract or will remain the intention.
          1. +2
            24 May 2013 21: 43
            Quote: Yeraz
            There was an intention to buy

            Why is this intention if there is already a contract for the T-90? Is Azerbaijan really so rich that it would contain two types of MBT of a fundamentally different design.
            1. Yarbay
              +2
              24 May 2013 21: 51
              Quote: Kars
              Why is this intention if there is already a contract for the T-90? Is Azerbaijan really so rich that it would contain two types of MBT of a fundamentally different design.

              Maybe because of this, the contract was canceled ??
              After all, the Turks offer joint production and, apparently, the tank is customized specifically for military operations in mountain conditions !!
              But this is not coming soon !!
              And before that, what will they buy?
              1. +2
                24 May 2013 21: 57
                Quote: Yarbay
                Maybe because of this, the contract was canceled ??

                The question is complex, the Turks have just begun to move Altai (I'm certainly not aware of the awareness of governments) of the T-90 if the contract was concluded in 2011, then at least a small part, the installation party, had to cross the border.
                Quote: Yarbay
                But then I don’t understand what tank they will buy in the short term! ??

                I can assume Used Leopards 2 which are now being disrupted --- this is if the equipment is needed Now, and not after 3-5 years
                1. Yarbay
                  +1
                  24 May 2013 22: 01
                  Quote: Kars
                  I can assume Used Leopards 2 which are now being disrupted --- this is if the equipment is needed Now, and not after 3-5 years

                  It is unlikely!!
                  There is an embargo on the supply of weapons to us and Armenia (in Germany), in principle, as well as in the EU and the USA!
                  So we bought self-propelled guns * Fyrtyn * Turkish, the Germans refused to deliver the engine !!
                  The Turks for our self-propelled guns in my opinion from the media agreed with the South Korean company !!
                  Bastion I think there are orders of Thailand and
                  probably soon production facilities will be freed!
                  Really Merkava buy ??
                  1. +2
                    24 May 2013 22: 11
                    Quote: Yarbay
                    Really Merkava buy ??

                    To tell the truth of the Merkav acquisition, it would be interesting for me personally to get third-party experience of using (and I'm not good) especially combat use in conditions of non-Israeli total superiority over Lebanon.

                    Then there is still China, it’s a pity that Korean K1 will pull on finances.
                    As for the embargo, I do not know, it is quite possible.
                    as for the strongholds, then the Thai commission arrived on May 20, all the statements were positive, but not specific, in theory there should be a delivery of the first installment, but they did not officially confirm it. As well as there are no claims from Thais.
                    1. Yarbay
                      +2
                      24 May 2013 22: 16
                      Quote: Kars
                      As for the embargo, I do not know, it is quite possible.

                      As for the embargo, 100 percent!
                      Even the cartridges do not sell !!
                      Quote: Kars
                      as for the strongholds, then the Thai commission arrived on May 20, all the statements were positive, but not specific, in theory there should be a delivery of the first installment, but they did not officially confirm it. As well as there are no claims from Thais.

                      And what do you think, having only T-72 tanks of various modifications in service, how justified is the purchase of a batch of 100 tanks, Oplot * or * Merkava * from a technical point of view?
                      And why not pull on K-1 ??
                      I mean a very expensive tank, more expensive than merkava ??
                      1. +1
                        24 May 2013 22: 26
                        Quote: Yarbay
                        I mean a very expensive tank, more expensive than merkava ??

                        I'm not aware of the official price of Merkava, but Korean tanks themselves are very expensive, I don’t even know why. Maybe the labor is expensive)))

                        Quote: Yarbay
                        What do you think, having exclusively T-72 tanks of various modifications in service, how justified is the purchase of a batch of 100 tanks, Oplot * or * Merkava * from a technical point of view?

                        I would start thorough repairs and modernization of cash T-72, besides your opponents have Abrams or Leopards.
                        I would suggest buying from Ukraine KAZ Barrier and sets of a new DZ Knife, Doublet and everything will be fine.
                      2. Yarbay
                        +1
                        24 May 2013 22: 34
                        Thanks for answers!!
                  2. +3
                    25 May 2013 10: 05
                    At the expense of the embargo, all of Western Europe, with the exception of England and Germany, refused the embargo.
            2. Predskazamus
              -1
              22 June 2013 20: 41
              I assure you there is money))))))) and the country's policy is nothing personal. buy the best. for example, in the future, in my opinion, the best tank is the stronghold of the Kharkov Design Bureau. and they are interested in. What should help Ukraine in supporting the defense industry, strengthening relations between countries
        2. Yarbay
          0
          24 May 2013 21: 49
          Quote: Kars
          What was it then about the rumors about the Turkish Altai? And in at least two years it was possible to start deliveries, despite the fact that the UVZ vet mass-produced tanks.

          The media reported that the contract for tanks by the Azerbaijani side was canceled !!
          I don’t know how true it is, since there were no serious comments from officials!
          I read only in one Russian newspaper that it’s because Russia didn’t sell planes!
          But then I don’t understand what tank they will buy in the short term! ??
  2. +4
    24 May 2013 06: 56
    well done work
  3. -1
    24 May 2013 07: 13
    As I understand it, judging by the fact that Ukrainian-Belarusian projects are multiplying - ours gave Belarusians tasks to bookmark the technology developed in this way :) It will be especially interesting if this product falls into NATO structure :)
    1. Wlad59
      +10
      24 May 2013 07: 59
      Someone kicked himself in the chest yesterday that "Ukraine does not produce new equipment for two simple reasons - there is nothing and nothing and soon there will be no one ..." - but today it turns out that "Ukrainian-Belarusian projects are multiplying."
      1. -2
        24 May 2013 08: 29
        Yes, and give GOD !!! Only to the mind also the MIND will not hurt ...
        Good afternoon! hi
        1. +3
          24 May 2013 12: 49
          Hey! The minus one! What is wrong with the defense industry of Belarus and Ukraine having a brain?
          The question is in the MIND of politicians.
          If hi who has a different opinion - speak out!
      2. KoRSaR1
        -4
        24 May 2013 10: 17
        Well, for how many years, for the first time, father or cebul has been making something from a couple, in principle, I am only happy for it, yet the defense industry in Ukraine is capable, but underfunding drowns it. Let as you say orders multiply, but not to the detriment of our own security, and the relations between us Slavs)
        1. Wlad59
          +1
          24 May 2013 11: 47
          And here I agree with you 100% and put + (minuses are not mine). Not financing is the main scourge .. ((my opinion: if politicians had not met with their phobias, enterprises (or rather people) would have agreed a long time ago to promote joint products. Once (I'm sure) it will
      3. Predskazamus
        -1
        22 June 2013 20: 51
        Tank Oplot is much ahead of All the samples of Russia. If Russia has a claim to the stronghold allegedly using Russian technology, then the new BTR-4MB, according to the recognition of the same Russians, is new and a cut above all existing armored vehicles
  4. -5
    24 May 2013 07: 43
    Why is this necessary, when Russia has much better development, there is no need to invent anything, everything is there.
  5. -8
    24 May 2013 08: 02
    Ukraine, together with Belarus, has developed a new radar for Azerbaijan


    Stop, stop, and what's new in the radar? Belarusian automobile chassis? ha, again, cheap Ukrainian populism, the development of 6 summer ago in a new wrapper. the article is a big minus (-) sucked the news from the finger.
    1. Wlad59
      +9
      24 May 2013 08: 48
      Let the radar and not the latest, the point is not that: the main thing is that it IS FOR SALE ... that is. Spark workers (and these are highly qualified specialists) will receive a salary, designers will have money for new developments, etc. And there will be money and specialists, in six months - a new radar with higher characteristics will be created in a year!
      1. 0
        24 May 2013 11: 00
        the bottom line is that, judging from the title of the article, a new sample has entered the market, I will explain to you on my fingers what the news came from, the Ukrainians ordered an N number of chassis for the MZKT (VOLOT) chassis, this ended joint development, Belarus has nothing to do with the radar station, but what you say "it is for sale" is probably yes, not Chinese to buy.
        1. Wlad59
          +4
          24 May 2013 11: 15
          I would not categorically argue that the participation of Belarus was only in the development of the chassis. The video (below) clearly shows that the radar also looks good on the KRAZ chassis. Maybe this was the demand of Azerbaijan ... but most likely Belarus still supplied some nodes or microcircuits. Especially since the times of the Union there have been preserved enterprises that operate (and successfully) in this area.
          1. 0
            24 May 2013 11: 26
            Perhaps Kraz did not comply with the technical specification, the bonnet-bezkapotnik, for example, the distribution of loads along the axles, the size did not match, anything, but "maybe" this is not an argument, I see the chassis.
    2. 0
      24 May 2013 09: 48
      Quote: seller trucks
      cheap Ukrainian populism again,

      Well, are you nervous? But they did it themselves! Now we ask ourselves how many such devices will be able to sell? How reliable will it be in work. In parallel, we recall a small incident that happened with Chinese radars in one of the countries of South America. Or with armored personnel carriers sold by Ukraine to Iraq, if I’m not mistaken.
      Although, I do not wish anything bad. Done and done. Well done, guys!
      1. Yarbay
        +1
        24 May 2013 21: 53
        Quote: Hedgehog
        Well, are you nervous? But they did it themselves! Now we ask ourselves how many such devices will be able to sell? How reliable will it be in work. In parallel, we recall a small incident that happened with Chinese radars in one of the countries of South America.

        But I think Ukraine has a lot of experience in the production of such weapons!
        Agree, one chain mail is worth it !!
        Unique in my technique!
  6. Boot under the carpet
    +2
    24 May 2013 08: 17
    Quote: DEDUCHKA
    Why is this necessary, when Russia has much better development, there is no need to invent anything, everything is there.

    Other enterprises also need to live somehow! And even more so, the Western Club is not very friendly with the technology of the Russian Federation.
  7. +3
    24 May 2013 08: 47
    Good morning everybody! hi

    quote-This radar interested Azerbaijan, for which a new version of the 80K6M PLC based on the Belarusian Volat chassis was proposed

    That's the radar itself.



    to be continued
  8. 0
    24 May 2013 08: 48
    end

    Radar all-around

    1. +2
      24 May 2013 09: 19
      It is impressive, the parameters are at a height, the operator's workplace, folding-deployment, some of the external nodes resembles the 5H-69 "Salute".
  9. pinecone
    0
    24 May 2013 08: 52
    "The radar station interested Azerbaijan, presentation, demonstration ...".
    It is unclear whether there was a specific purchase order or not.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    24 May 2013 09: 14
    In Ecuador, the niche has freed itself. You have to try it there.
  12. +2
    24 May 2013 09: 40
    Well done!
    Whatever they say, but the CIS countries still continue to reach each other. Moreover, someone who, and Ukraine, Belarus and Azerbaijan will certainly agree among themselves. It’s better to buy and sell your own than to feed the military-industrial complex of NATO countries or hand over secrets to China.
  13. Skavron
    +1
    24 May 2013 09: 47
    Something about the Ukrainian "Topaz" is not heard. It's a pity.
    1. Wlad59
      +1
      24 May 2013 09: 58
      "... At the moment" Kolchuga-M "is armed and used by the following states:
      - Ukraine 2-4 units
      - China 4-8 units
      - Turkmenistan 4 units
      - Georgia 2-3 units
      - Ethiopia 3 units ... - the cost of 1 unit. 5.6 million $ (products of the Topaz plant) "- April 2012.
      1. Skavron
        0
        24 May 2013 10: 13
        They just talked a lot with us, either about (!) Privatization, then about what people are being detained with. Now, in general, silence is complete throughout the plant.
        1. Akim
          +2
          24 May 2013 10: 45
          Quote: Skavron
          the fact that sn people are detained.

          Everything is in order - they pay. It’s just that the enterprise is on a self-financing basis and those who are engaged in purely civilian products, they have sales problems, and they are delaying a penny. Here is a fresh video:
          1. Skavron
            0
            24 May 2013 13: 59
            Well and good)
      2. 0
        24 May 2013 10: 41
        Georgia 2-3 units


        Correct writing - Georgia had 2-3 units until 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX laughing
      3. Rumi007
        +4
        24 May 2013 13: 21
        Back in 2010, Azerbaijan signed a contract with Ukraine on the supply of 6 units of the Kolchuga-M CPP. It is noteworthy that this is not written on Wikipedia. Although a lot of information about this. And also these installations were demonstrated to the President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev during a visit to a military facility in the south of the country. Even the photos were from that demonstration.
        1. Yarbay
          -1
          24 May 2013 21: 56
          Quote: Rumi007
          Back in 2010, Azerbaijan signed a contract with Ukraine on the supply of 6 units of the Kolchuga-M CPP. It is noteworthy that this is not written on Wikipedia. Although a lot of information about this. And also these installations were demonstrated to the President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev during a visit to a military facility in the south of the country. Even the photos were from that demonstration.

          I’m saying that I’ve definitely seen in some photo !!
      4. -3
        24 May 2013 15: 08
        Quote: wlad59
        - Ukraine 2-4 units


        according to my information, there is not one in the arsenal of Ukraine:

        "Chain M" is not a unique Ukrainian development. It was constructed on the basis of the Soviet system “Chainmail”. They began to develop “Mail M” at the Kursk Military Institute of the GRU of the USSR in the 80 of the last century. In 1987, all documentation on Chain Mail was transferred to the Topaz Donetsk Plant. In 2001, it was formally put into service with Ukraine.

        Ukraine is armed with 19 old Kolchugas and not a single Kolchuga M. As the director of the Topaz plant Yuriy Ryabkin stated in his interviews, over the years of independence, the Ukrainian budget has not found money to purchase a complex for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. But, for example, Ethiopia bought as many as three "Kolchuga M". The cost of one complex is up to $ 5 million. "



        2-4 figures are taken from Wikipedia which does not indicate the number of complexes, proofs are complete bullshit, don’t believe, go through yourself, Again Big Ukrainian nonsense
        1. Akim
          +5
          24 May 2013 15: 58
          Quote: seller trucks
          As the director of the Topaz plant Yuriy Ryabkin stated in his interviews, over the years of independence, no money was found in the Ukrainian budget for the purchase of a complex for the Armed Forces of Ukraine

          This information is already 4 years old, while it is not true. Already when Gritsenko was a minister, they bought 2 complexes. And now Topaz is fulfilling an order for the Ukrainian army for the supply of 4 more complexes.
          "Chain M" is not a unique Ukrainian development

          You probably cause irritation - the word Ukrainian. Naturally, this, like many other things, is not a national development. This is stupidity that you yourself have deduced. This is just a Ukrainian product. Do you feel the difference?
        2. Alexander D.
          0
          24 May 2013 20: 32
          seller trucks (1)

          Your information is incorrect. Here is the information from an authoritative resource:
          http://topwar.ru/13650-azerbaydzhan-prodolzhaet-vooruzhatsya-na-ocheredi-ukrains
          kaya-kolchuga-m.html
          UKRAINIAN "RINGS". WHERE AND HOW MUCH?

          Ukraine has provided British and American experts with comprehensive information about the produced and exported passive radio intelligence stations supplied by Kolchuga and their serial numbers. This was stated by the head of the presidential administration Viktor Medvedchuk at a press conference on November 12. According to him, since 1987 Ukraine has produced 76 Kolchuga units, including the modernized Kolchuga-M. The experts were given all the numbers of these systems, except for the first, which did not have serial numbers. By order of the USSR Ministry of Defense, 46 stations were manufactured, and in particular 14 for Ukraine. After 1992, 30 systems were produced, of which -18 were delivered to Russia, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine - 8. Produced in 1991, 3 stations were modernized and in 2000 delivered to Ethiopia through the export control service and Ukrspetsexport. V. Medvedchuk noted that there are 19 Kolchugas in Ukraine, which were demonstrated to a group of American and British experts. The Ukrainian side took such a step, knowing that it damages the national security of the country, stressed the head of the presidential administration. He also recalled that this year 4 Kolchugas were delivered to China and the group of experts demands that Ukraine provide data on their location. V. Medvedchuk noted that Ukraine cannot provide data that are commercial and state secrets of another country. He also believes that Ukraine has demonstrated unprecedented openness in providing information to the expert group. And that Ukraine is ready to cooperate with experts if its national interests are respected. Under these conditions, the official authorities are ready to continue working with experts and once again demonstrate that Ukraine has nothing to do with the transfer or sale of Kolchugas to Iraq.
      5. Yarbay
        0
        24 May 2013 21: 55
        Quote: wlad59
        "... At the moment" Kolchuga-M "is armed and used by the following states:

        So Azerbaijan ordered as far as I know and it seems that it has already received or not?
      6. Predskazamus
        -1
        22 June 2013 21: 04
        and Azerbaijan)))))))))) reliable information !!
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +1
    24 May 2013 11: 49
    Yes, the Ukrainian "Iskra" http://www.iskra.zp.ua/ has begun to work for everyone. And who of them is still his own and who is already strangers is not clear. And considering that Iskra was one of the leading companies of the Union in the development and production of the radar and that this radar used 3/4 of the technologies that were previously used in the ST 68 U radar, which is in service with the Russian Armed Forces, 36D6 M, etc. "toys", the news is not very pleasant for Russia. And if we take into account that the Belarusians most likely connected their specialists from NPO Agat to this development in terms of automating the processing of radar images on this radar, then the news is even worse. And not only for Russia but also for the growing military alliance of Belarus with Russia.
    1. 0
      24 May 2013 20: 19
      To the very point, although the Russian authorities are tracking all purchases of weapons, especially from neighbors, manufacturers, and buyers.
  16. Algor73
    +7
    24 May 2013 11: 53
    Yes, early some people bury the Ukrainian military-industrial complex ...
  17. gladiatorakz
    +2
    24 May 2013 15: 21
    Well done! Why just not on the "Kraz"?
    1. Akim
      +1
      24 May 2013 17: 52
      Quote: gladiatorakz
      Why just not on the "Kraz"?

      At KrAZ it is used as a semi-trailer. The deployment time is 20 minutes, and here it is 6. Although for such stations this parameter is not so important. Mobility is higher at the station based on a 4-axle MAZ chassis.
    2. Alexander D.
      0
      24 May 2013 20: 33
      Do not worry so much, on the basis of KRAZ and so many radars are produced!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"