Why did Hitler attack Poland?

15 211 85
Why did Hitler attack Poland?
Hitler watches German soldiers march into Poland in September 1939.


Polish question


Following the division of the German Empire—the Second Reich and the Austro-Hungarian Empire—following defeat in World War I, the western and northern regions populated by Germans were ceded to Poland. At Versailles, the borders were redrawn so that Poland gained access to the Baltic Sea, but this corridor cut off the bulk of Germany from East Prussia. Danzig-Gdansk received the status of a free city. Naturally, this posed a serious strategic threat to the Third Reich.



Polish Germans, with full organizational and financial support from Berlin, like the Germans of Czechoslovakia (Sudetenland), began to form political, national, social, cultural, and youth organizations. They had military branches and provided training. Danzig had a Nazi Party branch and its own Gauleiter (political and regional leader).

At the right moment, German organizations in Poland received the appropriate orders, and friction with the Polish authorities began. The question of reunification with historical homeland, the unity of all Germans. And Hitler and his diplomats suddenly became concerned about the rights of Polish Germans. They raised the issue of the Polish Corridor, and how Warsaw was hindering communications between Germany and East Prussia.

The situation in the German Reich


Most Germans welcomed the agreement with Russia (Why did Stalin reach an agreement with Hitler?). After the shameful Treaty of Versailles, during the most difficult time of collapse and depression, it was the Russians who were the first to extend a hand, proving themselves reliable and advantageous partners. Society praised Hitler's wisdom. They said he was a fine fellow, snatching all the benefits from Western democracies, fooling the West, and then reaching an agreement with Russia. The military was emboldened: defeating Poland would be easier in alliance with the Russians.

But the German elite—the old aristocracy, the generals, diplomats, and so on—was in disarray. On the one hand, Hitler was succeeding. Germany was growing stronger, step by step, and very quickly. The German elite received various perks, from ranks and awards to military contracts and the plunder of annexed territories.

On the other hand, despite all the Führer's successes, skepticism toward the upstart corporal remained. The German elite also greatly feared the West would soon punish Germany. This was the syndrome of the First World War.

Hitler wasn't considered a fully-fledged ruler. From the very beginning, many viewed him as a "clown" who should fulfill his role and leave. Cleanse the state of the accumulated scum, establish "German order—Ordnung." And leave. Give the position of head of state to more respectable figures.

He was seen as a dilettante and an upstart, his every move a target of gossip and criticism. He was seen as a man leading Germany to a new military and political catastrophe. The Führer abolished the Treaty of Versailles and its restrictions on Germany, revived the army, and fleetHe sent troops into the Rhineland. The elite clutched their heads, fearing that the Germans would be punished. They feared that France and Britain, with almost all of Europe behind them at the time, would not tolerate such a thing, that there would be war and terrible defeat.

But the Führer got away with it, time and again. The opposition calmed down. Generals and dignitaries who had plotted palace coups and assassinations, and prophetically spoken of the approaching catastrophe, temporarily calmed down, receiving further awards and promotions.

Before the Anschluss of Austria, the seizure of the Sudetenland, and the partition of Czechoslovakia, the German elite once again became frightened. They thought they should stop there and take stock. The country lacked the army and military resources to confront the West. Hitler was leading the country into inferno-hell. Once again, the military's top brass plotted against the Führer, but once again they hesitated to act. Once again, the Führer achieved brilliant victories.

Preparations for war with Poland agitated the opposition with renewed vigor. Old fears had been forgotten, but now they were confident that France and England would not allow Poland to be devoured. They claimed that they had previously managed to reach an agreement with the Western democracies, so Germany had lifted the Versailles restrictions and occupied Austria, the Sudetenland, and the Czech Republic. But now Hitler had allied himself with the Bolsheviks, defied the West, and so disaster awaited.

However, all opposition was limited to behind-the-scenes talk. No one dared to speak out against the Führer while he was in power.

Economic crisis or war


Meanwhile, the smartest ones realized it was time to run away. In particular, the Jewish bankers. Some "true Aryans" followed them.

In particular, the "steel king" Fritz Thyssen, owner of an entire industrial empire, the Ruhr metallurgy, who financed the Nazis. He welcomed war with the USSR but opposed conflict with the West. In 1939, he moved with his family to Switzerland and prepared to leave for Latin America. In 1940, he dictated his book, "I Financed Hitler," to the American journalist Emery Reeves.

In reality, German capital played a secondary role in the rise of Hitler personally and the Nazi Party. The leading role was played by the businessmen from London and Washington, the leading banking houses of the so-called "financial international." The masters of the West needed a major war to resolve the crisis of capitalism and achieve absolute domination of the globe.Why the USA started a world war).

In early 1939, the Second Reich's "financial genius," Hjalmar Schacht, sent a letter to Hitler, declaring that the government's course would lead to financial collapse. He abruptly resigned as head of the Reichsbank. However, he retained his post as minister without portfolio and received numerous commendations from the Führer. Schacht also opposed the invasion of Poland. Later, he also opposed war with the USSR, realizing that Germany could not sustain a Russian campaign economically.

Shakhty was a very intelligent man; he jumped off in time, avoided the fate of a war criminal, and lived to be 93 years old (he died in 1970).

At the same time, it was he who created the Reich's war economy. First, Schacht restricted capital flows and radically changed foreign trade. Trade agreements were concluded under which Germany provided loans to countries, which were then used to purchase German goods. They also preferred to buy goods from countries that themselves actively purchased from Germany.

Secondly, a parallel quasi-currency—mefo vouchers—was introduced. Siemens, Krupp, Rheinmetall, and Gutehoffnungshütte founded the Metallurgical Research Society (Metallurgische Forschungsgesellschaft, or MeFo). The state acted as guarantor. The vouchers made it possible to extract idle capital and provide producers with funds without inflation. Over the four years 1934–1937, the volume of securities issued reached 12 billion Reichsmarks. Mefo vouchers were used primarily to develop the military industry.

The problem was that This policy brought Germany to the brink of bankruptcy. Funds for rapid economic growth, militarization, the creation of an army, navy, and aviation were obtained through financial speculation and fraud, like meth vouchers. If in 1932, Germany's total debt was 12,5 billion marks, by June 1938 it had grown to 38,5 billion marks. And in 1938, Hitler and Schacht poured another 11 billion marks into the armaments program.

However, guns and Tanks do not provide economic prosperity. The militarized economy and the country had to "work off" the mountains produced weaponsThe professionals understood all this well.

Thus, in April 1939, Forbes, an adviser to the British embassy in Berlin, reported:

It can by no means be ruled out that Hitler will resort to war to put an end to the intolerable situation into which he has placed himself by his economic policy.

In May, British Ambassador Henderson wrote to Lord Halifax:

Can Germany survive another winter without war? And if not, will Hitler prefer war to economic catastrophe?

Thus, the global financial international, Schacht, and his ilk first created Project Hitler, then drove the German Reich into a trap. An economic depression, or even a Great Depression-style catastrophe in the United States, or war!

Berlin, London, and Washington saw and understood everything perfectly. Only war could avoid a classic crisis of capitalism, a debt crisis. It overturned the traditional laws of capitalism, allowed for debt write-offs, and allowed for the plunder of captured countries. Meanwhile, the military-led economic expansion continued.

Even the new "Munich Agreement" regarding Poland no longer suited Berlin. Hitler was obliged to start a major war, as planned by the "architects" from Paris, London, and Washington. It was precisely for this purpose that the "global conspiracy," the financial capital of the United States and Britain, and their associated agents in Germany itself, nurtured the "Black Sun" project, the German Nazis. The time had come to repay the debts.

Hitler himself didn't want a "new Munich," as Mussolini proposed. He needed a war so the Wehrmacht could gain combat experience and so Germany's new elite—the Nazis and the SS—could prove themselves. Himmler was forming the first combat units of the SS, and the creation of a new, parallel army was underway.

The timing was favorable. An agreement had been reached with Moscow. Behind-the-scenes negotiations were also underway with the West. Hitler knew there would be no real "second front." Poland would be allowed to be crushed, as they were certain the Germans would turn on the Russians next.


Adolf Hitler and Hjalmar Schacht
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 17
    17 June 2026 04: 47
    "Poland is simply unbearable! It can't be tolerated any longer!" That's roughly what Hitler said. Hitler is long gone, but his words are still relevant today. wink
  2. +9
    17 June 2026 04: 57
    Who knew Adolf would display such treachery? If Hitler hadn't attacked the USSR, but had instead concluded a trade treaty with it, allowing the Soviet Union unlimited resources for the war, the world map would be completely different today. Germany would have gained Africa, the Middle East, and Europe. The Japanese would have gained Indochina, India, China, Australia, and New Zealand. The USSR would have reclaimed Alaska and possibly annexed Canada. With the launch of Operation Barbarossa, Germany finally lost all chance of victory. It was fighting against an alliance of states far superior in industrial might and manpower.
    1. + 11
      17 June 2026 05: 18
      You've forgotten the Black Sea straits and Constantinople. But seriously, the USSR wouldn't have joined the aggressors, and Hitler wouldn't have abandoned his desire to destroy the USSR.
      1. +4
        17 June 2026 22: 55
        Hitler would not have abandoned plans to destroy the USSR, if only because the first point of characterizing fascism (or its variety in the form of National Socialism) is “Anticommunism.” sad
    2. 0
      17 June 2026 05: 28
      Quote: fiberboard
      Well, who knew that Adolf would show such treachery?

      After the defeat of 1918, ideas of revanchism flourished in German circles, among both nationalists and communists. Moreover, from the very beginning of his political career, Hitler declared his hostility primarily toward the USSR. The victors of World War I feared the rise of France and prevented it from annexing territories west of the Rhine or from creating a military alliance of Poland, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia against Germany—or, more accurately, a system of alliance treaties between France and each of these states. This is precisely what led to the Anschluss of Austria and the occupation of Czechoslovakia. Furthermore, France rather carelessly overlooked Germany's rise and did not enter into a military alliance with the USSR in time against Franco's regime and Germany.
      Quote: fiberboard
      With the start of the Barbarossa plan, Germany finally lost all chance of winning.

      If Spain, Türkiye, and Japan had also attacked the USSR in the summer of 1941, Germany's victory would have been quite significant. The United States could only fully enter the war in 1943.
      1. +8
        17 June 2026 08: 32
        Could you elaborate on the German communists' revanchism? Or is it just a guess?
        Hitler also had a soft spot for the French, which he reflected in his opus, "Mein Kampf."
        No one was afraid of France's strengthening, neither England (which had a military treaty with this country), nor the United States.
        France created a military alliance of small states around itself (the Little Entente) without any particular problems during the interwar period. It also had a triple military alliance with the USSR, and Barthou easily found common ground with his colleague Litvinov.

        There was no frivolity; the calculation was that Hitler could be "channeled" against the USSR. And France acted largely on British instructions.

        Japan had already tried it at Khalkhin Gol. And the notorious Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact clearly demonstrated to the Japanese that the Reich was an unreliable ally. Turkey wasn't particularly interested in a war with the USSR; good relations with the USSR had proven very beneficial to the Turks and they valued them. And the Turks didn't want to quarrel with the British at the time. This also applied to Spain. The US, with its powerful economy, was already shifting the balance of power. The failures in the "Battle of Britain" and the "Battle of the Atlantic" are largely due to the US (in fact, the US was already at war with the Reich in 1941, sinking German submarines that threatened convoys).
        1. +3
          17 June 2026 09: 09
          Quote: Illanatol
          No one was afraid of France's strengthening.

          ,
          After World War I, Germany was subject to a large indemnity. To secure this indemnity, Germany occupied the Rhineland, intending to annex it. As a result of this unification, France would gain coal deposits and could develop a powerful steel industry based on French iron ore and German coking coal. K. Adenauer and Dörten were considered for positions first in the independent Rhineland and then in the French provinces. Negotiations with them focused on a separate currency reform as a first step toward establishing a "buffer" Rhineland. German trade unions began sabotaging the production of goods destined for France, especially coal. The intensity of the strike movement in the Rhineland was so high that German workers' wages had fallen by half in the year leading up to 1923. Strikes in Germany and the resulting switch from cheap German coal to expensive English coal led to the shutdown of approximately 40% of blast furnaces in France in April 1923. Of course, small, unprofitable blast furnaces were closed. But the decline in pig iron production fell by a third in some months, and by a quarter in steel production in 1923. M.I. Kalinin then called on the Germans: "At this critical moment... Russia once again raises its voice of indignant protest against the insane policies of the French government... against the suppression of the right of the German people to self-determination." If Kalinin called on the Germans to revanchism, then the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) was obliged to implement the recommendations of the Comintern. Source: "History of France," 1973, Nauka Publishing House, Volume 3, Edited by Gintsberg.
          1. +1
            17 June 2026 12: 39
            All this is of little significance. The existence of the triple military alliance between the USSR, France, and Czechoslovakia is a more significant fact, as is the creation of the Little Entente. Kalinin did not call for revanchism; this is mere speculation. It's simply that the USSR at that time was partly in solidarity with Weimar Germany, which had been greatly humiliated by the Versailles Treaty. At that time, the USSR and the quite democratic Weimar Republic were, in their own way, comrades in misfortune and actively collaborated.
            1. +1
              17 June 2026 15: 22
              Quote: Illanatol
              Kalinin did not call for revanchism, this is just speculation.

              The quote clearly demonstrates that the USSR desired a weakened France and a stronger Germany in 2023. This was boldly stated in all history textbooks for Soviet schoolchildren. Revenge is a continuation of the struggle to improve one's position. The French hoped to annex the Rhineland and Bavaria from Germany after victory in World War I, while the Germans dreamed of returning all lands with a significant German population to Germany. Later, Hitler diplomatically returned the Saarland coal basin to Germany, taking it from France. The option of handing over the colonies seized by Great Britain to Germany was considered. But Hitler instead opted for the "Drang nach Osten."
              1. Alf
                +1
                17 June 2026 17: 22
                Quote: gsev
                But Hitler instead decided on the "Drang nach Osten".

                Why the hell? What on earth did Aloisych use to start a war with the USSR, already facing a war with Britain, which he was never able to enter, the US, and the entire British Commonwealth? Especially considering the prospect of a two-front war.
                1. -1
                  18 June 2026 00: 24
                  Quote: Alf
                  And why the hell?

                  He simply repeated the mistake of Wilhelm and Napoleon. Moreover, Hitler made this mistake by unleashing World War I by attacking Poland.
                  1. Alf
                    0
                    18 June 2026 10: 43
                    Quote: gsev
                    Hitler started World War I by attacking Poland.

                    Maybe the SECOND one after all?
                    1. Alf
                      0
                      18 June 2026 10: 50
                      He simply repeated the mistake of Wilhelm and Napoleon.

                      But there are two options here.
                      1. Or he was so stupid that he did not understand the lessons of history.
                      2. Or he was not so independent.
              2. 0
                18 June 2026 07: 47
                In 2023—definitely unlikely. Certainly back in 1923. But that's certainly not revenge. Did the USSR desire a weakened France? Okay, but for its own interests. France participated in the recent intervention in the USSR; the French visited Odessa. Germany's strengthening doesn't mean revenge; it's primarily a restoration of lost sovereignty in politics and economics. And what kind of revenge can we talk about, after all, Germany has changed. Instead of a monarchy, there's the entirely democratic Weimar Republic. Given the resources and small size of the German army at the time (only 100 under the Versailles treaty), revenge is out of the question. Back then, Germany had every reason to fear aggression from Poland; even the Poles were stronger militarily.
                In 1923, Hitler was simply a political clown; no one took him seriously. He was later deliberately cultivated as a homunculus, not by Soviet communists, but primarily by the Anglo-Saxons, who hoped to use him as an "icebreaker" against the USSR, a fact that was not particularly hidden. The more far-sighted Yankees, however, planned to use Hitler and the Reich against England itself, weakening it and establishing their control, first economic and then political, over the English colonies, which quite successfully succeeded. Now Canada and Australia are on their knees before Uncle Sam. Moreover, the Yankees, represented by Trump, are already talking about a direct takeover of Canada. If successful, Australia will be next.
                1. 0
                  18 June 2026 10: 49
                  Quote: Illanatol
                  At that time, Germany had every reason to fear aggression from Poland,

                  But it was precisely between 1922 and 1926 that Germany's path was determined. Either France would seize the Rhineland and achieve the creation of an independent Bavaria within its zone of influence, or Germany would recover, commit aggression against the USSR in 1941, and attempt to provoke a thermonuclear war between NATO countries and Russia in 2027. And despite its weakness in 2023, it was the USSR, the Comintern, and Kalinin and Radek who pushed Germany to regain its militancy and strength, thus thwarting all attempts by mighty France to reduce Germany to the status of Romania in 2023.
                  1. 0
                    18 June 2026 13: 21
                    Another greeting from a parallel universe! laughing Kalinin with Radek, the Comintern in 2023... well, stop making people laugh, really.
                    Yeah, I can just imagine how mighty France, led by Macron, is driving Germany into the ground. lol laughing
      2. +1
        18 June 2026 11: 24
        Quote: gsev
        If Spain, Türkiye, and Japan had also attacked the USSR in the summer of 1941, Germany’s victory would have been quite high.

        Spain didn't share a border with the USSR, so why would they attack? Turkey was quite realistic about its military capabilities against the USSR—they were practically zero. And Japan... Well, what would occupying the Far East have given it economically, other than a boost to its ego?
        1. +1
          18 June 2026 19: 25
          Quote: Prometey
          Spain didn't have common borders with the USSR, why would they attack?

          Spain participated in the war against the USSR. Around 30,000 Spaniards fought on Hitler's side. Franco was simply smarter than Hitler and managed to avoid being drawn into the war on a full scale. Turkey always had a strong ground army. With the support of German air power, its forces in the Caucasus theater of operations would have been quite combat-ready. It's worth noting that in Syria and Libya, the Turks reaped all the benefits from the overthrow of Gaddafi and Assad.
          1. 0
            19 June 2026 11: 48
            Spain was not a party to World War II. It's not just the army that fights, but also the economy. The Turks had had enough of World War I, so they realistically assessed their economic and technical capabilities to compete even during the USSR's difficult times.
            1. 0
              19 June 2026 15: 23
              Quote: Prometey
              Spain was not a participant in the Second World War.

              Near Leningrad, almost as many Spaniards died in two years as Americans died in the Vietnam or Korean Wars or during the occupation of Afghanistan. And certainly more Americans died in the wars in Iraq and Iran combined.
              1. 0
                19 June 2026 15: 31
                So what next? There have always been mercenaries.
                1. 0
                  19 June 2026 15: 43
                  Quote: Prometey
                  So what next? There have always been mercenaries.

                  The Spanish government paid soldiers of the Blue Division in 1941 and 1942. In 1942, Spaniards were also sent to the Blue Division upon mobilization. The USSR simply lacked the capacity and desire to fight Spain alone in 1945, with the United States opposing it, to avenge the Blue Division's deployment and to liberate Spain from Franco's fascist dictatorship.
            2. 0
              16 August 2026 10: 17
              The Turks remembered well who really helped the young Turkish Republic repel Greek and French aggression in 1919-23. On the monument to the Republic, next to Ataturk, are the figures of Voroshilov, Frunze, and Aralov.
    3. -2
      17 June 2026 05: 46
      Quote: fiberboard
      Who knew that Adolf would show such treachery?

      What's so perfidious about this? Hitler saw the USSR as a colossus with feet of clay. He simply began actively supporting Stalin's policy of intensifying internal repression, planting compromising materials on those who could potentially pose a threat. No other country during that period could match the effectiveness of its destruction of the intellectual and military elite. And he only attacked the USSR after he had conquered all of Europe except Britain.
      1. Alf
        +4
        17 June 2026 17: 37
        Quote: Vitaly_pvo
        Stalin's policy of strengthening internal repressions,
        1. +2
          17 June 2026 19: 37
          Further proof that Western countries, including the United States, supported Stalin's destruction of the most literate representatives of the Soviet state in every possible way.
        2. +3
          18 June 2026 00: 33
          Quote: Alf
          Quote: Vitaly_pvo
          Stalin's policy of strengthening internal repressions,

          In reality, it was in the USSR that Hitler had the largest fifth column. All repressions against the subjugated population of the USSR were carried out primarily by Vlasov's men and local police. Moreover, the Russian traitors remained loyal to Germany almost to the end. After World War II, those who sided with Hitler sought to continue the fight against Stalin and the USSR in alliance with Latin American countries, the United States, and Western European states. Compare the size of Russian formations such as the Turkestan battalions, the ROA, the Kaminsky Brigade, and the UPA with the size of military formations composed of citizens of France, the United States, and Great Britain. What Goebbels' propaganda presented as the actions of fifth columns, upon careful study by Ion, turned out to be Nazi military sabotage units.
      2. +1
        16 August 2026 10: 20
        Well, the British agent, the head of the Abwehr, Canaris, tried to sell Hitler information about the weakness of the USSR, about its insufficient potential for a modern war.
    4. +3
      17 June 2026 08: 34
      Hitler couldn't help but attack the USSR, as he himself said and wrote about more than once. Anything else is baseless fantasy.
    5. 0
      17 June 2026 10: 53
      Quote: fiberboard
      With the start of the Barbarossa plan, Germany finally lost all chance of winning.

      Ungrateful Germany bit the hand that gave. The outcome is known.
    6. 0
      18 June 2026 10: 24
      Simple military logic: don't leave a strong army in your rear. That's why Hitler didn't go for Iraqi oil through Turkey or reinforce his Afrika Korps. The logic of war demanded that the potential threat from the East be destroyed.
  3. +3
    17 June 2026 05: 33
    Quote: gsev
    nor create a military alliance of Poland, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia against Germany,
    What about the Little Entente, except for Poland, but with Romania?
  4. +9
    17 June 2026 07: 07
    I wonder if there will be an article about how Poland prepared for war with Germany and had plans to invade it?
    1. 0
      18 June 2026 00: 12
      After WWI and the emergence of the Polish state, Polish military plans regarding their western neighbor were constantly evolving. To counter the Weimar Reichswehr, which posed no serious threat to Poland, there were offensive plans, the implementation of which the Western allies did not approve of at the time, and they remained just that – plans. During the period of the formation of Nazism, even during Piłsudski's lifetime, the trend was toward a close rapprochement between Poland and the Reich in a joint confrontation against the USSR, towards which the Poles had well-planned aggressive intentions. The end of the Piłsudski era, however, brought the Poles back closer to their Anglo-French allies, especially since the German Wehrmacht was already a formidable force, and Hitler's demands on their eastern neighbor had begun to pose a threat to the state's territorial integrity. This formed the basis for the final pre-war plans, which envisioned an active defense until the entry of the British and French into the war. However, German aggression ended with the "Phoney War" in the West and the "Liberation Campaign of the Red Army" in the East (which the "Polish Army" met with almost no resistance), leading to the defeat of Poland and its army.
  5. -1
    17 June 2026 07: 20
    The global financial international, Schacht and his ilk, first created Project Hitler, then drove the German Reich into a trap. An economic depression, or even a Great Depression-style catastrophe in the United States.
    Hitler was the one who pulled the economy out of a deep crisis: in 1932, unemployment was 30%, GDP was less than the GDP of 1914.

    And the GDP of 1939 was already 2 times higher than the GDP of 1932, unemployment was 0, there was rapid economic growth.

    War is not an end in itself, but a means of achieving geopolitical goals, which in turn feed the military economy.
    1. -1
      17 June 2026 08: 16
      So how do Germany's stated successes dispute the post about the "Hitler" project?
    2. -1
      17 June 2026 22: 56
      This entire "miracle" was based on the state's constant injection of money into the economy through government loans and the printing of a new currency, which isn't a particularly sustainable strategy, especially given how dependent Germany was on imports and the fact that, unlike Russia, it didn't have a stabilization fund or other large reserves in 2022. In this regard, Samsonov, despite his typical nonsense about Anglo-Saxons, capitalists, and other enemies of the ancient Rus', is absolutely right: in the state the German economy was in by September 1939, it couldn't survive for long without an infusion of resources, and the only way to obtain them "free of charge" in the required quantities was war.
      1. -1
        18 June 2026 06: 33
        Quote: shocktrooper
        resources, and the only way to obtain them "free of charge" in the required quantity was war

        Enormous resources were spent on the war with Poland, and the captured resources of impoverished Poland were wasted.
        1. -1
          18 June 2026 20: 48
          Lol, that Poland, with a population almost comparable to Germany's, with tons of natural resources, with a decent industry – is poor. Oh well.
          1. +1
            19 June 2026 07: 58
            Quote: shocktrooper
            , with a population almost comparable to Germany's

            belay lol laughing
            Quote: shocktrooper
            a bunch of natural resources

            lol
            Quote: shocktrooper
            a good industry

            lol
  6. +1
    17 June 2026 08: 12
    Berlin, London, and Washington saw and understood everything perfectly. Only war could avoid a classic crisis of capitalism, a debt crisis.

    In our capitalist country, such a moment may also arise.
  7. +7
    17 June 2026 08: 22
    The article doesn't address the topic mentioned in the title. The author has deviated in his reasoning. And Russia—instead of the USSR—is a sign of journalistic dishonesty.
  8. +2
    17 June 2026 08: 41
    From the very beginning, many perceived him as a “clown” who should fulfill his role and leave.

    So many associations with modern politicians...

    The militarized economy and country had to “work off” the mountains of weapons produced.

    It's bad that this scenario is repeating itself in Germany, driving it into economic crisis. And the image of Russia as a single external enemy shouldn't be any consolation for Poland and other countries, supposed allies in the EU. When the hunger strikes, they'll be the first to be eaten again.
  9. +2
    17 June 2026 09: 30
    The German elite also greatly feared the West would soon punish Germany. This was the syndrome of the First World War.

    And so it was. Scans of encrypted telegrams from Maisky, our ambassador to England, have been posted online, I believe on the "Memory of the People" website. He wrote to Moscow that he had met with high-ranking officials in London, and in their conversations it became clear that the main goal of England, and France, which had joined it, was to preserve their colonial empires. To hell with Europe, we'll have to sit on an island, not for the first time.
    The beginning of the war with Poland. September 1st was chosen for a reason. It was the final date for the war to begin. In a month or a month and a half, the autumn thaw would begin, and the army would get bogged down. The roads in Poland were roughly the same as ours.
    1. +2
      17 June 2026 10: 12
      Quote: Not the fighter
      The roads in Poland were about the same as ours.

      Well, I wouldn’t say so, I remember Tvardovsky - “Do you remember, Alyosha, the roads of Smolensk region....”
      Especially between the Smolensk and Kalinin regions, where there was no front for 50 km between the Western and Kalinin fronts.
    2. 0
      18 June 2026 06: 25
      That's exactly how it was. Scans of encrypted telegrams from Maisky, our ambassador to England, have been posted online, I think on the "Memory of the People" website.

      Why scans? Everything is here:
      https://dvp.sssr.su/
  10. +2
    17 June 2026 09: 58
    The masters of the West needed a major war to solve the problems of the crisis of capitalism and achieve absolute domination on Earth.

    It's the same now: the masters of the West need a major war. In the 30s, they found Hitler, and the Reich's fortunes began to flow. Now it's the same story: the masters of the West have found a new Hitler in the form of a small-town man, and once again, money and weapons are flowing. For Russia, this isn't a major war, but a new Patriotic War.
    1. +2
      17 June 2026 16: 20
      War is money, but money isn't for us. It's also true, I think, that war is the solution to almost any crisis. Devastation and chaos will wipe everything away, and nothing old will be visible underneath. War = the reshaping of the world (global)—like with a hard drive—format it and start over...
      1. +1
        17 June 2026 17: 21
        Quote: lshka
        I think war is the solution to almost any crisis; devastation and chaos will be written off, and nothing old will be visible underneath.

        The war arises from the crisis of the "masters of the West"; for them, war is like a life preserver for a drowning man.
        1. +1
          17 June 2026 21: 45
          I'm afraid it's not just because of the "West," everything has become too rotten, in short, everything has become interconnected, and for the sake of a handful of "bad people," the whole world will have to answer... (maybe it sounds stupid, a conspiracy theory... but)
  11. 0
    17 June 2026 18: 54
    Hitler invaded Poland because he believed it would prevent a major war with Germany. Events proved him gravely mistaken. What he had envisioned as a "small victorious war," as Plehve called such wars, turned into a catastrophe for Germany and for him personally within a few years.
    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Маленькая_победоносная_война
    Experience shows that people with excessive power, after a while, lose the ability to critically evaluate the consequences of their actions, and those close to them are afraid to talk about it :((...
    1. +3
      18 June 2026 09: 44
      Yours is untrue, at least within the framework of a school history course.
      After the war with Poland began, Hitler found himself in a "phoney war." Having dealt with Poland, he conquered France, Yugoslavia, Greece, and the rest of the Low Countries, following the principle of "appetite comes with eating." Hitler himself started these wars.
      1. -1
        18 June 2026 09: 50
        After the war with Poland began, Hitler received a "phoney war".

        He got the war, and then events unfolded beyond his control—half the world was drawn into it. Exactly what he feared happened.
        Hitler started these wars himself.

        I was forced to start. One thing led to another.
  12. 0
    17 June 2026 19: 24
    Let me quote from the verdict of the International Military Tribunal, which is available on the website of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation.

    Everyone must clearly understand that from the very beginning we were determined to fight the West. A life-and-death struggle... Above all, the destruction of Poland.


    https://epp.genproc.gov.ru/ru/gprf/activity/veterans-rights/documents/e82608/
    1. 0
      18 June 2026 00: 52
      "It was clear to me that sooner or later we would come to a conflict with Poland. I had made this decision back in the spring, but I thought that I would first act against the West, in a few years, and only then against the East. I wanted to establish acceptable relations with Poland in order to be able to act against the West first. But this plan, while entirely acceptable to me, could not be carried out after a number of significant factors changed. It became clear to me that Poland would attack us in the event of a conflict with the West."

      the moment had come to settle the dispute with Poland by military intervention; that although conflict between Germany and the West was inevitable someday, the likelihood that Great Britain and France would come to Poland's aid was slim

      https://epp.genproc.gov.ru/ru/gprf/activity/veterans-rights/documents/e82608/
      In other words, Hitler planned from the very beginning to fight the West. He believed, however, that leaving Poland in the rear was unacceptable, as a war with the West would stab Poland in the back. Therefore, he believed it was important to first conquer Poland before starting a war with the West. The document also shows that he believed that England and France would not come to Poland's aid. He was mistaken, as we now know.
      1. +2
        18 June 2026 08: 07
        In other words, Hitler planned from the very beginning to fight the West. He believed, however, that leaving Poland in the rear was unacceptable, as a war with the West would stab Poland in the back. Therefore, he believed it was important to first conquer Poland before starting a war with the West. The document also shows that he believed that England and France would not come to Poland's aid. He was mistaken, as we now know.

        The Judgment contains documented words from Hitler's own speech to the Commanders-in-Chief on August 22, 1939:

        First and foremost, the destruction of Poland. The goal is the destruction of manpower, not the achievement of any specific geographic line.


        This proves that the attack was not a standard military campaign for border security; the Nazis had planned mass murder from the very beginning.
        1. -1
          18 June 2026 09: 13
          Proves you have a rich imagination or a poor knowledge of Russian. The term "manpower" is used to refer to enemy troops.
          destruction of manpower, not the achievement of any specific geographic line

          This clearly indicates that Hitler planned to defeat the Polish army, not simply seize a portion of its territory. This is entirely consistent with his statements about preparing for war with the West.
          1. +2
            18 June 2026 12: 12
            Proves you have a rich imagination or a poor knowledge of Russian. The term "manpower" is used to refer to enemy troops.
            destruction of manpower, not the achievement of any specific geographic line

            This clearly indicates that Hitler planned to defeat the Polish army, not simply seize a portion of its territory. This is entirely consistent with his statements about preparing for war with the West.


            Your attempt to reduce Hitler's words to a standard military operation is refuted by the Verdict of the International Military Tribunal.
            According to the text published by the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, the goal was not simply to secure the rear, but, I quote directly: "First of all, the destruction of Poland".

            Moreover, the Tribunal found:The basis of this occupation policy was the complete destruction of Poland as a national entity... Poland was to be treated as a colony, the Poles would be slaves..."

            Therefore, it was a plan for genocide and destruction of statehood, and not an ordinary war.
            1. 0
              18 June 2026 18: 20
              The goal was not just to secure the rear, but, I quote directly: “First of all, the destruction of Poland.”

              To protect their rear. This is what is written in the verdict you are referring to. Read more.
              1. 0
                18 June 2026 21: 07
                To protect their rear. This is what is written in the verdict you are referring to. Read more.


                According to the text published by the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, the goal was not just providing rear support, and I quote directly: "First of all, the destruction of Poland".
                1. 0
                  18 June 2026 21: 26
                  "First and foremost, the destruction of Poland"—yes, to secure the rear. It's written there in black and white.
                  It became clear to me that Poland would attack us in the event of a conflict with the West.
                  1. 0
                    18 June 2026 23: 52
                    "First and foremost, the destruction of Poland"—yes, to secure the rear. It's written there in black and white.
                    It became clear to me that Poland would attack us in the event of a conflict with the West.


                    According to the Judgment of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Nazi "rear security" did not consist of disarming a neighbor, but of committing genocide.

                    The court ruled: "The evidence establishes that the basis of this occupation policy was the complete destruction of Poland as a national entity and the merciless exploitation of its human resources... Poland is to be treated as a colony, the Poles will be slaves."

                    Trying to explain the phrase "First of all, the destruction of Poland" by the standard concern for the security of the rear is a deliberate disregard for the racial and extermination doctrine of Nazism, which was legally condemned at Nuremberg.
                    1. 0
                      19 June 2026 01: 50
                      standard concern for rear security

                      There are many ways to ensure rear security. The Nazis did it criminally. hi
                      1. 0
                        19 June 2026 10: 24
                        There are many ways to ensure rear security. The Nazis did it criminally.

                        hi
  13. +3
    17 June 2026 21: 51
    "It was the Russians who were the first to extend a hand, proving themselves reliable and profitable partners," the Bolsheviks said. And it was the resources from the territories of the former Russian Empire, occupied by the Germans after the First World War, that saved Germany from total collapse...
  14. +1
    18 June 2026 05: 05
    The Lipetsk Secret Aviation School (German: Geheime Fliegerschule und Erprobungsstätte der Reichswehr, official German cover - Wissenschaftliche Versuchs- und Prüfanstalt für Luftfahrzeuge (WIVUPAL), in the Red Army documents it was listed as the 4th Aviation Detachment of the 3rd Aviation Squadron) was a secret joint training and testing center of the Reichswehr and the Red Army Air Forces, which operated in Lipetsk from 1925 to 1933.

    The school was created to circumvent the restrictions of the Treaty of Versailles, which prohibited Germany from maintaining a military air force. In Lipetsk, German pilots underwent combat training, and engineers tested new prototypes of combat aircraft and airborne weapons. In turn, the Soviet side gained access to advanced German aviation technology, air combat tactics, and pilot training methods.
    1. +2
      18 June 2026 07: 58
      The vast majority of graduates of this educational institution are Soviet pilots.
      This may have been a circumvention of restrictions, but it was not a violation of them. The guarantors of the Treaty of Versailles had no particular complaints. Germany could well have had similar schools in other countries. It was difficult for Germany to develop new combat aircraft prototypes at that time (before 1933)... except perhaps for export.
      And yes, after Hitler came to power, this cooperation was curtailed.
      1. -1
        18 June 2026 09: 55
        The vast majority of graduates of this educational institution are Soviet pilots.

        Most of Germany's top military leaders studied in the Union.
        Among them were the future Chief of Staff of the Supreme Command, Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel; Field Marshal Walter Model; Field Marshal Walther von Brauchitsch; General Manstein; Kruse; Horn; Feige; Hitler's Air Force adjutant, Colonel Nicholas von Below; and many others. And the future Luftwaffe aircraft designer Hugo Junkers also lived in Moscow in the late 20s, where he interned at Andrei Tupolev's design bureau.
  15. 0
    18 June 2026 05: 14
    "Kama" (derived from the name of the city of Kazan and the surname Malbrandt) was a German tank school created on the territory of the USSR near Kazan to circumvent the terms of the Treaty of Versailles of 1919 on the basis of the Treaty of Rapallo concluded on April 16, 1922, during the Genoa Conference.

    The agreement to establish a tank school was concluded in December 1926 in Moscow. On the German side, it was signed by Colonel von der Lith-Thomsen, head of the Moscow Center and VIKO, and on the Soviet side, by Yakov Berzin, head of the IV Intelligence Directorate of the Red Army Headquarters.

    The Kazan tank school only began practical training in the first half of 1929. The tank school was established on the grounds of the former Kargopol Regiment barracks near Kazan and included a military camp, a shooting range, and a tank testing ground.

    From 1926, Oswald Lutz, a future German tank general, headed the school's establishment. In 1929, Colonel Mahlbrandt (alias "Markart") was appointed head of the school, followed by von Radlmaier ("Raabe") in 1930. From 1931 to 1933, Colonel Josef Harpe ("Hacker"), a future colonel general in the Wehrmacht, headed the school. The deputy head of the school was a representative of the Red Army, who supervised Soviet personnel and handled matters of interaction with government agencies.

    The school's activities were supervised by the "Automotive Inspectorate" or "Inspectorate No. 6" of the German Defense Ministry. The German firms Krupp, Rheinmetall, and Ehrhardt received a secret assignment from the General Staff: to design and manufacture light and medium tanks, which were delivered to Kazan in disassembled form. The entire teaching staff consisted of German representatives.

    In total, approximately 40 Reichswehr officers completed training at the facility over the three-year period it operated. In 1929-30, 10 German officers completed the Kama courses, 11 German officers in 1931-32, and 9 German officers in 1933. In 1932, the school had 176 teaching and support staff, 26 of whom were German instructors.
    1. +1
      18 June 2026 14: 48
      Of course, the USSR did not give its territory to the Germans for free.
      German engineers also did a lot in the USSR, from bakeries to complex engineering technology, pharmaceuticals, and chemistry.
      When Hitler came to power in 1933, he completely banned any military-technical cooperation with the USSR, allowing the Germans to build only civilian infrastructure in the USSR, with the obligatory condition that the plans be destroyed after the project was completed.

      Thanks to the Germans, many things appeared in the USSR that became almost cult: rope-twine, vacuum tube radios (as well as vacuum tubes in general),
      bottles with a cork-closing mechanism and much, much more
  16. +1
    18 June 2026 07: 52
    Quote from solar
    The document also shows that he believed that England and France would not come to Poland's aid. He was mistaken, as we now know.


    So how did these democracies actually help Poland? Could you elaborate on how they stormed, or at least attempted to storm, Germany's western borders in September 1939?
    According to the terms of the military treaty, these allies were to begin active military operations against Germany NO LATER THAN 17 days after the aggressor's attack on Poland. So, did they begin?
    1. -1
      18 June 2026 09: 57
      So how did these democracies actually help Poland?

      They tied Germany down to war, constantly expanding its borders—which is what Hitler feared most when attacking Poland. He was right to fear it, by the way.
      1. +1
        18 June 2026 13: 16
        They weren't even tying Germany down to war at the time. In western Germany, the Wehrmacht had disabled teams, not full-fledged divisions. All tanks were going to Poland, and most of the Luftwaffe was deployed against the Poles. The French could easily have broken through the Siegfried Line, which wasn't combat-ready. The superiority in forces was manifold: thousands of French tanks against zero (not counting the "Little Entente"). But it was a "phony war," complete passivity. And after the allotted time (17 days) had passed, Stalin, realizing that Poland had already collapsed, was simply forced to move his units into the "eastern borderlands." He didn't occupy the entire "sphere of influence" stipulated by the PMR; he didn't need Polish territories per se, only those populated by Ukrainians and Belarusians. Such an atypical "imperialist." By September 17, it wasn't even known exactly where the Polish ministers were—whether they had already fled to Romania, or were still at the border... Even the Polish ambassador in Moscow didn't know for sure, so he didn't want to accept the Soviet note "requesting" the introduction of troops into Polish territory, which had essentially ceased to exist.

        Yeah, Germany was tied down by war. No wonder Hitler thought his hands were tied... with his hands tied, he began to launch blitzkrieg after blitzkrieg across Europe. laughing
  17. 0
    18 June 2026 10: 20
    Poland did everything possible and impossible to prevent Germany from attacking it. The situation is the same today. The Poles are demanding reparations from the Germans, and at the same time, they are demanding Kaliningrad. So instead of '39, it will be '29. And in 100 years, everything will repeat itself. The Poles cannot be remade; they can only be destroyed.
  18. +1
    18 June 2026 14: 39
    Hitler's main mistake was that he started World War II from Poland.
    If Hitler had attacked the USSR in 1939, everything you see now in Europe and the United States would have been exactly the same, with 100% certainty. Only this time, Europeans would have flown German flags on their homes and worn Nazi flag badges. And Hitler himself would have been greeted with applause in European and American capitals.
    All of Europe and the United States would have applauded Hitler, collected money for him, and in their European factories would have produced weapons, explosives, tanks, food, and everything else necessary for the war with the USSR.
    And of course, many Western armies would have sent their troops to help Hitler.

    But Hitler made the most catastrophic and monstrous mistake: he started World War II with the Western powers. This cost him defeat at the hands of the coalition of former implacable enemies – the Anglo-Saxons and the Communists.
    1. 0
      19 June 2026 18: 34
      Quote: esoterica
      But Hitler made the most catastrophic and monstrous mistake: he started World War II with the Western powers. This cost him defeat at the hands of the coalition of former implacable enemies – the Anglo-Saxons and the Communists.

      Are you writing this with regret?
    2. 0
      25 June 2026 14: 12
      Why did Hitler attack Poland? Poland had its own plans for war with the USSR. Poland laid claim to the territory of the Ukrainian SSR to create a state "from sea to sea." Hitler had his own plans for this territory. The two aggressors could not reach an agreement.
  19. 0
    18 June 2026 23: 36
    Poles have always been tools, Poles have a bad character.
    Hitler was a villain, but the fascists who ruled Poland at the time were no better. If something bad can be done, the Poles will do it, and everyone will want something for themselves.
  20. 0
    19 June 2026 19: 46
    In the event of victory over the USSR, both Hitler and Poland would lay claim to the territory of Soviet Ukraine. This was an insurmountable contradiction that ultimately led to war.
  21. 0
    20 June 2026 02: 20
    Quote: Alf
    Quote: gsev
    But Hitler instead decided on the "Drang nach Osten".

    Why the hell? What on earth did Aloisych use to start a war with the USSR, already facing a war with Britain, which he was never able to enter, the US, and the entire British Commonwealth? Especially considering the prospect of a two-front war.
    Hitler himself answered your question long ago: at a meeting with Germany's top military leadership at the Berghof on July 31, 1940, he stated:
    "We will not attack England, but will shatter the illusions that give England the will to resist. Then we can hope for a change in its position. The war itself is won. France has fallen away from the 'British lion.' Italy is tying down British troops. Submarine and air warfare may decide the outcome of the war, but this will last a year or two. England's hopes are Russia and America. If hopes for Russia collapse, America will also fall away from England, since the defeat of Russia will result in an incredible strengthening of Japan in East Asia (...) If Russia is defeated, England will lose its last hope. Then Germany will dominate Europe and the Balkans. Conclusion: In accordance with this reasoning, Russia must be eliminated. The deadline is the spring of 1941."

    It's unlikely anyone in the Kremlin could have imagined that Hitler would view a war with the USSR solely through the prism of "forcing England to an honorable peace for Germany." Although such a reason had already played a role once in Russian history:
    "As early as 1810, Napoleon ordered books containing information about Russia, its history, and its peculiarities to be delivered to him. Judging by the Emperor's fragmentary statements and the scant information coming from his entourage, Napoleon had already, by the autumn of 1810, begun to accustom himself to the idea that the English—that stubborn, elusive, persistent enemy whom they had failed to defeat in Cairo, Milan, Vienna, Berlin, or Madrid—could be dealt a final, crushing blow only in Moscow. This idea grew stronger in Napoleon with each passing month. A Grand Army in Moscow meant Alexander's submission, the complete, unfettered implementation of the Continental Blockade, and therefore victory over England, the end of the war, an end to crises, an end to unemployment, the strengthening of the world empire, both internally and externally. The crisis of 1811 finally turned the emperor’s thoughts in this direction.”
  22. 0
    20 June 2026 02: 26
    Quote: esoterica
    Hitler's main mistake was that he started World War II from Poland.
    If Hitler had attacked the USSR in 1939, everything you see now in Europe and the United States would have been exactly the same, with 100% certainty. Only this time, Europeans would have flown German flags on their homes and worn Nazi flag badges. And Hitler himself would have been greeted with applause in European and American capitals.
    All of Europe and the United States would have applauded Hitler, collected money for him, and in their European factories would have produced weapons, explosives, tanks, food, and everything else necessary for the war with the USSR.
    Hitler understood this too. And he began negotiating an attack on the USSR jointly with Poland as early as early 1939, immediately after the end of the war in Spain. But he failed to reach an agreement with the Poles regarding Danzig—an originally German territory (in his view), which the Poles were absolutely unwilling to give up.
    1. 0
      20 June 2026 02: 38
      Incidentally, in the summer of 1939, Hitler had another opportunity to attack the USSR, this time in conjunction with Japan. But by then, he had already fallen out with the Poles, and since early April, the Wehrmacht had been preparing to invade Poland. The Soviet Union was very lucky then!
  23. 0
    20 June 2026 03: 12
    Quote: Illanatol
    And after the expiration of the established period (17 days), Stalin, realizing that Poland had already collapsed, was simply forced to introduce his units into the “eastern borderlands.”
    Stalin waited not only for the appointed deadline but also for the signing of peace with Japan (signed on September 16). It was the war with Japan at Khalkhin Gol that forced Stalin to enter into a treaty with Germany. It was the pact with Germany that prevented Japan from launching a full-scale war: the Japanese realized that their ally in the Anti-Commintern Pact would not help them, at least in the near future, and they were afraid to fight alone. Therefore, they accepted the defeat of their entire army at Khalkhin Gol (no one could believe they would suffer such humiliation from Russia, defeated in 1905). And Prime Minister Hiranuma, who had dreamed of a joint war against the USSR, was ousted, replaced by a champion of the conquest of the southern seas. According to Japanese historian H. Teratani, “never before or since in history has there been a case where the Japanese government resigned due to the conclusion of a treaty between two other states.”
    Few people understand the trap the Soviet Union escaped from in 1939. In a war on two fronts—against Germany and Japan—we would have had no ally. Europe and the United States would have happily supported Germany and Japan, both morally and materially.

    At the same time, it does not occupy the entire "sphere of influence" provided by the PMR; it does not need Polish territories per se, only those populated by Ukrainians and Belarusians.
    These territories were captured by Poland in 1920 during the Polish-Soviet War. Moreover, Poland, which had just recently gained independence, started the war.
  24. 0
    26 June 2026 06: 25
    Because he was a destructive personality - an incestuous necrophile of the anal type, according to E. Fromm.
  25. 0
    31 July 2026 01: 58
    Quote: Alf
    He simply repeated the mistake of Wilhelm and Napoleon.

    But there are two options here.
    1. Or he was so stupid that he did not understand the lessons of history.
    2. Or he was not so independent.

    History teaches us that it teaches no one.