We can, when needed: heavy diesel engines YaMZ-770/780

17 556 43
We can, when needed: heavy diesel engines YaMZ-770/780


Bears from Yaroslavl


To understand the innovation of the YaMZ-770 and YaMZ-780, it's important to briefly trace the evolution of engine engineering at the Yaroslavl Motor Plant. For decades, YaMZ was known primarily for its V-shaped diesel engines of the YaMZ-236 and YaMZ-238 series, which became the mass-produced power plants for trucks, buses, and tractors in the Soviet and post-Soviet periods. Although these engines were repeatedly modernized, their architecture and a number of parameters reflected the technological level of the 1960s and 1970s.



The transition to more modern solutions began with the development of the mid-size inline-series YaMZ-530, designed for mid-size trucks, buses, and special-purpose vehicles. The engine was not built in-house, but with the help of the Austrian company AVL List. Its older brother, the YaMZ-653, was a licensed copy of the French Renault dCi11 diesel engine. It could be found under the hood of, for example, the Ural. The 653 became a temporary solution, filling a power gap of around 400–430 hp. However, dependence on foreign licensing and components remained, and the potential for boosting and localization was limited. In parallel, the YaMZ-650 inline-series diesel engine, similar in design to foreign engines of the same class, was developed using borrowed technologies. However, by the mid-2010s, it became clear that the Russian industry required a completely original heavy-duty in-line diesel engine, designed from the ground up for a wide power range, with a large boost capacity and the ability to meet future environmental and industry requirements.


YaMZ-770. Source: dd76.ru

Initially, development was initiated for military vehicles, which is logical, as this is where maximum localization of components is required. The YaMZ-780 was created for the advanced Bumerang and Kurganets armored platforms, while the YaMZ-770 was developed for heavy civilian vehicles. It's important to note that when developing the cylinder dimensions (130 mm diameter and 156 mm stroke), Yaroslavl designers engaged a foreign engineering consultant, the Austrian company AVL. However, the block, cylinder head, crankshaft, and many other components were designed from scratch, without directly copying existing foreign designs.

Thus, the YaMZ-770/780 became a logical continuation of many years of evolution, but at a new technological level. While the earlier V-shaped engines and even the inline YaMZ-530/650 largely reflected the adaptation and modernization of existing concepts, the 770/780 family became the first completely indigenous flagship platform of heavy-duty inline turbodiesels, developed for high outputs of up to 750 hp with ample boost reserves.

Six cylinders in a row


Competition is the key to technological progress. Yaroslavl engine builders, with their 770/780, found themselves in direct competition with an engine from Naberezhnye Chelny. This was the 910 series, which was produced in collaboration with the Swiss company Liebherr—and here they had to turn to imported partners. The engine is a typical world-class heavy-duty diesel—an inline six-cylinder with a displacement of 12 liters and a power output of up to 560 hp. The Yaroslavl engine is similar in many ways—a six-cylinder diesel with a displacement of 12,42 liters, designed for power outputs of 400 to 620 hp and torque in excess of 2500 Nm.

The YaMZ specifications indicate a slightly higher maximum engine power and a wider power range. This means the engine promises to be more versatile than its competitor from Naberezhnye Chelny. To be fair, there's no direct competition between the KAMAZ-910 and the YaMZ-770/780. The former are installed almost exclusively on KAMAZ trucks, while the latter are designed for a wide range of equipment from various manufacturers. The production version of the YaMZ-770 is eagerly awaited. Confirmed contracts for the new model exist with Minsk Automobile Plant, Ural Automobile Plant, Bryansk Automobile Plant, Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant, Likino Bus Plant, and manufacturers of special-purpose equipment, agricultural machinery, mining equipment, and stationary power units.


YaMZ-780

A brief overview of what the new Yaroslavl diesel engines are.
The engines are based on a four-stroke design with a displacement of 12,4–12,42 liters, a cylinder bore of 130 mm, a piston stroke of 156 mm, and a compression ratio of 17,5. The cylinder head—a monoblock, 24-valve, cast-iron design with an integrated camshaft—is a completely original design, distinguishing both engines from previous models of similar dimensions. The first YaMZ-770 prototypes were demonstrated back in 2018, and serial production was planned for 2025. However, as often happens, the deadlines were pushed back.


Common Rail fuel injection system

The key technological innovation of the new YaMZ family is the Common Rail fuel injection system—a fundamentally different approach to injection compared to traditional unit injectors or in-line fuel injection pumps used on previous YaMZ engines. The essence of the Common Rail system is that fuel is forced under pressure by a high-pressure pump into a common accumulator rail, from where it is supplied to each injector, regardless of the cylinder's firing cycle. The injection pressure of the YaMZ-770 reaches 2000 bar, while that of the military version, the YaMZ-780, reaches 2200 bar. The Common Rail system offers several interrelated advantages. High injection pressure ensures fine atomization and virtually complete combustion of the fuel, resulting in low fuel consumption of 206–210 g/kWh. Electronics control multi-phase injection in real time, which reduces noise, reduces exhaust toxicity and allows the engine to comply with Euro 5 and Euro 6 standards.

Unlike the civilian YaMZ-770, the military version of the 780 is equipped with a gear drive instead of a belt drive, which improves reliability in harsh operating conditions. A key feature of the YaMZ-780 is its dual engine control system—the redundant circuit ensures operation even in combat-damaged conditions. The maximum power of the military engine is 750 hp at a maximum speed of 2300 rpm, and the stated service life is 2500 engine hours. The stated service life of the YaMZ-770 family of engines before overhaul is up to one million kilometers—a figure comparable to the best global counterparts in its class.

Both engines are structurally similar and share a number of features with the YaMZ-650, but differ in their completely original components—the cylinder block, cylinder head, and crankshaft. An additional military-applied advantage of the YaMZ-780 is its multi-fuel capability.

The civilian YaMZ-770 is equipped with a single-stage turbocharger with intercooling in an air-to-air heat exchanger mounted directly on the engine. Cooling the compressed air before it enters the cylinders increases its density and allows for more efficient fuel combustion in each cycle, increasing power and reducing thermal stress on components.

The YaMZ-780 is equipped with a more complex two-stage turbocharging system with air-to-water intercooling. Two-stage air compression allows for significantly higher boost pressure. An air-to-water intercooler is more compact and efficient than an air-to-air intercooler, which is especially important in the confined spaces of armored vehicles. It is this two-stage turbocharging that largely accounts for the military engine's 750 hp from a displacement of 12,4 liters—an exceptionally high boost for an inline-six engine.


BMP "Kurganets"

The military version has a fundamentally different cooling system compared to the civilian version: a dual-circuit system with separate "hot" and "cold" circuits. The hot circuit cools the block and cylinder head—heat-stressed areas that require maintaining high operating temperatures for maximum efficiency. The cold circuit serves two charge air coolers, a generator, and a voltage and current regulator. This architecture allows for optimal management of the engine's thermal balance under any operating conditions—from arctic cold to desert heat—without compromising reliability.

In addition to the main electric starter, the military YaMZ-780 engine is equipped with a pneumatic starter that cranks the engine using compressed air. This provides a backup starting mechanism in the event of a discharged battery or damage to the electric starter. Serial production of the YaMZ-780 was planned for the Tutaev Experimental Repair Plant in the Yaroslavl Region. There is no word yet on the engine's serial production (like the arrival of the Boomerang and Kurganets in the military), but its civilian counterpart is expected to enter production in the fall of 2026.

Particularly significant in the context of technological sovereignty is the extensive use of Russian components: turbochargers, common rail fuel injection system, cylinder-piston assembly, plain bearings, high-power fasteners, cast iron and aluminum castings—all of these are produced by domestic companies. This makes the YaMZ-770/780 family one of the most localized modern Russian engines.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    15 June 2026 05: 01
    The author forgot to mention the legendary YaMZ 204, the new engine is a direct successor (at least in appearance).
    1. +1
      15 June 2026 07: 05
      YaMZ is a private plant... according to unsubstantiated rumors, it is controlled by Deripaska.
    2. + 11
      15 June 2026 07: 18
      The YaMZ-204 is a GMC 4-71; I can't remember if it was simply copied or licensed. And the 236-228-240 series is a Soviet design school. These engines shouldn't be put in the same category.
      By the way, the 4-71 was produced in the States longer than here and reached very good parameters, at the level of 236. And the consumption was significantly reduced.
      1. +5
        15 June 2026 10: 42
        Quote: belost79
        YaMZ-204 is a GMC 4-71, I don’t remember whether it was simply copied or licensed.

        The most popular theory is that our company couldn't afford a license; it was too expensive. Instead, they bought all the equipment for producing this line of diesel engines in bulk from the US, disguised as machine tools for an engine repair plant. They slightly modified the design to suit domestic production, and the result was the YaMZ-204.
    3. +4
      15 June 2026 07: 21
      The author forgot to mention the legendary YaMZ 204,

      204 is a 4-cylinder engine, and YaMZ also produced a six-cylinder engine, the YaMZ-206...
      and these engines were two-stroke
    4. +3
      15 June 2026 11: 30
      204 two-stroke. Fueled by pump-injectors. Naturally aspirated. Has nothing in common with the unit under discussion, other than the three letters in its name. None at all.
      And yes, 750 hp with 12 liters of volume, that’s very impressive!
      1. ANB
        0
        15 June 2026 17: 04
        . 750 hp with 12 liters of volume, that’s very impressive!

        I have a 2 liter 200 horsepower crossover.
        Are these different horses?
        Torque, yes, much less.
        1. 0
          17 June 2026 14: 10
          I have a 2.2 diesel, 200 hp and 450 Nm.
          Trucks have a longer service life and better cooling. Kamaz offers a 1,5 million km warranty and a 200-mile service life on its diesel engines. The 12-liter engines have 1,5-2,0 ton Nm of torque and more. Basically, it's comparable to mine.
      2. 0
        16 June 2026 19: 30
        Quote: Grossvater
        And yes, 750 hp with 12 liters of volume, that’s very impressive!

        Me too. But it all gets spoiled by the "This makes the YaMZ-770/780 family one of the most localized modern Russian engines." That is, not completely localized.
    5. +2
      15 June 2026 11: 47
      When you write, check your writing. The YaMZ 204 (a copy of the GMC 4-71) is a two-stroke engine, while the YaMZ-770/780 are four-stroke. Do you need to explain the fundamental technical differences between these two engines and how air gets into the combustion chamber in a two-stroke engine?
  2. 0
    15 June 2026 05: 07
    The first prototypes of the YaMZ-770 were demonstrated back in 2018, and serial production was planned to begin by 2025. But, as often happens, the deadlines were pushed back.

    Everything else is just wishful thinking. "It turned out as usual" (V.S.Ch.)
  3. +4
    15 June 2026 05: 27
    So where are these Boomerangs and Kurgans?
    1. +3
      15 June 2026 12: 18
      Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
      So where are these Boomerangs and Kurgans?

      During a war, no one will reorganize production from proven and well-developed models to new, promising ones. Moreover, the widespread use of drones has changed the requirements for armored vehicles, even though the platform itself, powertrain, transmission, and chassis are not significantly dependent on drones.
      But the main thing in the article is that the price of the 7 Series inline engines is not mentioned.
      After all, diesel engines for armored vehicles differ from their civilian "brothers in class" precisely in the conditions of use.
      While the most important factors for a road train are service life, fuel efficiency, and environmental requirements, a tank's diesel engine needs to be lightweight, powerful, and inexpensive. A "million-mile" diesel isn't necessary, nor is it super-efficient. A tank can travel 12-14 km before needing a major overhaul. Yes But in war there is much less.
      That's why the relatively inexpensive, lightweight (1000 kg), and powerful (over 1100 hp) V-92F is now widely used. The UTD-20 and 29 are also in the same category.
      Maybe we shouldn't stick to the principle: where a horse goes with its hoof, a crab goes with its claw?
      After all, something special is always better than something universal.
      1. +3
        15 June 2026 13: 09
        Quote: Alekseev
        During a war, no one will restructure production from proven and perfected models to new, promising ones.

        The experience of any war shows the opposite! For example, World War II: they started with biplanes and ended with rockets and jets!
        1. +1
          16 June 2026 11: 36
          Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
          The experience of any war shows the opposite! For example, World War II: they started with biplanes and ended with rockets and jets!

          But those who got carried away with their wunderwaffe lost that war. And the winners were those who overwhelmed the enemy with iron—massively average tanks. Yes, one Panther is worth nine Shermans—but the tenth will pass right past its charred hull. And smaller forces can't spread themselves across all sectors of the front.
          1. +1
            16 June 2026 13: 45
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Yes, one Panther is worth nine Shermans - but the tenth one will pass by its burnt hull.

            Started with the KV-1, finished with the IS-2. Progress? And the T-34 and T-34-85 are different machines. And compare the I-15 and La-7. Without any wunderwaffes, the development is obvious! And why, instead of the tried-and-true hearing tubes, did all the countries develop and produce radars?
      2. +1
        15 June 2026 13: 16
        Quote: Alekseev
        During a war, no one will restructure production from proven and perfected models to new, promising ones.


        But in this case, it's absolutely in vain. Because right now, our soldiers on the front lines are forced to resort to wild amateurism, welding metal structures onto tanks to form a troop compartment... That is, on the front lines, they have to do what should be done in a factory environment—build a proper heavy infantry fighting vehicle or armored personnel carrier.

        If it has reached the point where tanks are being converted en masse, and in a hasty manner, into heavy infantry fighting vehicles/armored personnel carriers on the front lines, then the plant is obliged to start producing them.
      3. +1
        15 June 2026 13: 49
        Quote: Alekseev
        During a war, no one will restructure production from proven and perfected models to new, promising ones.

        During the Great Patriotic War, they were constantly changing things. KV-IS; Su-85; Su-152 (USSR), T3(T4)-T6 (Germany), you can forget about the airplanes altogether. They started with some, finished with others. So there would have been something to replace them with. But replacing real aircraft with cardboard prototypes – yeah, that's not a good idea.
        1. 0
          15 June 2026 17: 53
          Quote: Fast_mutant
          During the Great Patriotic War they were constantly changing.

          Everything depends on industrial capabilities. Where they were greater, jet aircraft, radio fuses, guided bombs, and even nuclear weapons emerged. But in our country, we mostly didn't change, but rather improved, trying to ensure that the manufacturing technology and key components of the Yak-1 weren't significantly different from the Yak-9, and the KV from the Is. And this was done without reducing weapons production. The T-44, for example, freed from many of the T-34's shortcomings, entered production after the war.
          And the excellent Tu-2 didn't replace the "Pawn" during the war. All the "Pawns" were decommissioned only shortly after the fighting ended. And GAZ didn't produce the GAZ-51, developed during the war, but rather churned out the GAZ-AA.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. +4
    15 June 2026 05: 55
    Common Rail fuel supply system

    If only the quality of our diesel fuel were acceptable. They're apparently planning to use the 770th in the navy.
    I had a diesel N. Patrol ICE ZD30 Common Rail, even after the separator, it didn't like diesel fuel. Until you cleaned or replaced the fuel filter, it barely drove and smoked...
  5. +5
    15 June 2026 06: 09
    Could you briefly tell me about the salary at YaMZ?
    According to my information, the plant is looking for specialists with a net salary of 50 thousand...
  6. +6
    15 June 2026 06: 26
    The main thing now is that these factories, Yaroslavsky and Tutaevsky, don't fall under some kind of privatization scheme by savvy investors who will "optimize" the staff, drive them into debt, bankrupt them, and auction them off, then build a "Merry Fly Agaric" residential complex on the vacated land.
    1. +4
      15 June 2026 07: 13
      Well, they have been private property for a long time anyway.
  7. +2
    15 June 2026 07: 25
    For decades, YaMZ was known primarily for its V-shaped diesel engines of the YaMZ-236 and YaMZ-238 series...

    The line ended with a 12-cylinder engine: YaMZ-240...
  8. +1
    15 June 2026 09: 31
    Quote: Nyrobsky
    Now the main thing is that these factories, Yaroslavsky and Tutaevsky, do not fall under any privatization by cunning investors.


    They have not been state-owned for a long time.
    , but are parts of larger companies. TMZ belongs to KAMAZ, and YaMZ to the GAZ Group.
  9. +4
    15 June 2026 10: 35
    common rail fuel supply

    And at least THREE filters in the fuel system...
    When water gets in... the system dies quickly!
  10. +3
    15 June 2026 11: 33
    Quote: Lynx2000
    I had a diesel N. Patrol ICE ZD30 Common Rail, even after the separator, it didn’t like diesel fuel, until

    I've had a 110 Defender with a TD5 engine for 22 years now. After changing the leaky factory fuel filter, it seems to be running fine. Knock on wood. I've driven at least a dozen diesel cars in my immediate circle. No one complains about the diesel. Knock on wood again.
    1. ANB
      +4
      15 June 2026 17: 01
      Nobody complains about diesel fuel.

      Military/navy diesel fuel and diesel fuel from a gas station are completely different diesel fuels.
      I have a diesel too. And no problems. But I only fill up at Lukoil and Gazpromneft. I only use other gas stations if I'm really desperate.
  11. 0
    15 June 2026 18: 23
    And there is silence from the naval diesel engines.
    New and modern ones are very much needed.
  12. 0
    15 June 2026 19: 57
    When comparing different diesel engines, a pattern emerges: large two-stroke engines are the most fuel-efficient. However, larger-displacement diesel engines are larger and heavier. Moreover, size is more important than weight. I can suggest an idea that would reduce the height of this diesel engine by 40 cm.
    1. 0
      15 June 2026 23: 48
      Quote: also a doctor
      I can offer an idea that will allow us to reduce the height of this diesel engine by 40 cm.

      Put it on its side! wassat
      1. 0
        16 June 2026 00: 25
        This won't reduce the dimensions. I'm talking about a real reduction. I won't charge a high price.
        1. 0
          16 June 2026 20: 53
          There is no need to reduce the dimensions: the crankcase and receiver of a small engine are cramped. No.
    2. +1
      15 June 2026 23: 53
      Yes and no. A two-stroke engine's overall height is already reduced by eliminating the complex cylinder head with valves and drive train. Furthermore, each cylinder performs a power cycle at every revolution, while a four-stroke engine only does so at every second revolution.

      A two-stroke engine also has less weight and displacement for the same power. However, it also has its drawbacks. First, it only produces torque over a limited rpm range. Therefore, you need a very good automatic transmission...
      1. 0
        16 June 2026 00: 26
        Study the design of modern marine diesel engines. They no longer have the old valveless cylinder head.
  13. +1
    16 June 2026 13: 22
    And whose fuel system is that? The picture shows a Delphi pump. Have we learned to make it as good as Bosch and Delphi, or is it just parallel imports again?
    1. 0
      17 June 2026 14: 16
      Altai High-Precision Mechanics Plant...I heard something about that. They've mastered it in Russia.
  14. +1
    16 June 2026 18: 59
    Weak in terms of engine life and a glutton like crazy! Well, if everything has changed? Then hurray! I'm sincerely glad!
  15. +1
    17 June 2026 14: 15
    YaMZ has significantly improved the quality of its diesel engines over the past 10 years. As far as I understand, they've reached a good European standard. Their small diesels sell well, and the heavy-duty V12 YaMZ850 with 1050 hp is also on the way.
    And Liebherr's Kamaz trucks have already been used in agricultural machinery and at sea to replace the popular Volvo Pentastar.
  16. +1
    20 June 2026 21: 12
    Greetings to all fellow Tutayev engine builders! You're the best!
  17. 0
    8 July 2026 10: 39
    The author is clearly not an engineer and does not know the terminology at all.
    I was especially touched by the phrase "resource for forcing" laughing
  18. 0
    28 July 2026 15: 15
    Quote: belost79
    The YaMZ-204 is a GMC 4-71; I can't remember if it was simply copied or licensed. And the 236-228-240 series is a Soviet design school. These engines shouldn't be put in the same category.
    By the way, the 4-71 was produced in the States longer than here and reached very good parameters, at the level of 236. And the consumption was significantly reduced.

    The legendary Screaming Detroit, virtually the only diesel engine in the United States for a long time, was used in everything from quarry excavators to Greyhound intercity buses. It's also known for its tendency to run away.
    And the 238 is a vital thing for the north, it still carries a significant portion of the northern supplies and is highly respected there.
  19. 0
    30 July 2026 08: 40
    hp and torque over 2500 Nm.

    Good engine. The B-2 has about the same torque.