Why does the Russian Army need a second tank command school?

17 305 57
Why does the Russian Army need a second tank command school?
Source: 31tv.ru


Tanks in the Age of Drones


On May 27, 2026, the Government of the Russian Federation issued Order No. 1238-r, a document that, after almost two decades, returns Chelyabinsk Higher to the map of military education in the country. tank The 50th Anniversary of the Great October Revolution Command School (ChVTKU) has been established. Regional Governor Alexey Teksler announced that the first intake of 200 cadets is planned for this year. The school will be located on the grounds of another disbanded military academy—the former Chelyabinsk Higher Military Automobile Command and Engineering School, which was liquidated in 2010 by decision of then-Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov.



The Chelyabinsk Tank School was established by a General Staff directive on June 30, 1941—ten days after the start of the Great Patriotic War. The choice of Chelyabinsk was no accident: it was home to the Chelyabinsk Tractor Plant (ChTZ), which had mastered production of KV-1 heavy tanks as early as 1940. The city, which would soon be named Tankograd, became a breeding ground not only for armored vehicles but also for the commanders who would lead them.

From its first months, the school conducted a bold pedagogical experiment: cadets were assigned to ChTZ work teams and were directly involved in tank production, from the foundry to final assembly. Thus a unique tradition was born: a tank driver who knew his tank not from textbooks, but because he had assembled it himself.

By the end of 1941, 2500 people were enrolled in the school. The first graduation—552 officers—took place in May 1942. Beginning in 1943, priority in recruitment was given to Red Army soldiers and junior commanders with combat experience recalled from the front. Immediately before the Battle of Kursk, the school's graduates formed the officer corps of 16 heavy self-propelled artillery regiments.

During the war, the school graduated 37 classes and trained nearly 7,000 junior tank officers. Twenty-one graduates were awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union.


Source: chvtku.ru

In June 1948, during the general reduction of the Armed Forces, the school was disbanded for the first time. However, by the mid-1960s, Marshal Malinovsky approved the initiative to restore it. In December 1966, the formation of the Chelyabinsk Higher Tank Command School began, and on April 20, 1968, it was awarded the Battle Banner and the honorary title in honor of the 50th anniversary of the Great October Revolution.

The circumstances that led to the school's disbandment in 2007 deserve special mention, if only because they demonstrate the role that factors far removed from strategic planning sometimes play in the fate of military institutions.

On New Year's Eve, December 31, 2005, to January 1, 2006, an emergency occurred in the support battalion of the Chelyabinsk Tank Institute: as a result of prolonged bullying by fellow soldiers, Private Andrei Sychev was awarded a disability. The case received widespread public attention. Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces Vladimir Moltenskoy stated the following in January 2006:

The Chelyabinsk Institute isn't exactly a successful training ground for future tank officers, and last year it was included in the Ground Forces' academy optimization plan. But after the well-known and unprecedented emergency, the school's disbandment will likely be accelerated.

Thus, the strategic decision was made regarding which of the two tank schools—Kazan or Chelyabinsk—to liquidate. The choice fell on Chelyabinsk. On April 19, 2007, the Russian Government issued a decree liquidating the academy, and on May 22, by order of the commander of the Purebred Military District, the Chelyabinsk Tank Institute was disbanded.

The former school grounds were sold. Today, residential complexes rise up on them. Only the "Troops' Stop Complex," built between 1904 and 1905—a pre-revolutionary building—survived and received cultural heritage status. And on the site where cadet companies once marched, the "Sovietsky" wholesale and retail market has sprung up. It couldn't be more symbolic.

Revival


The revival of the Chelyabinsk Tank Academy is part of a systemic process. A special military operation revealed a critical shortage of officer personnel, and the Ministry of Defense responded to this challenge with a large-scale program. In 2025, plans were announced to create or revive up to 15 higher military educational institutions by 2034.

The following have already opened: the Nizhny Novgorod Guards Higher Military Engineering Command School (2025) and the Saratov Higher Military Engineering School of the NBC Protection (2025). The Ulyanovsk branch of the Krasnodar Flight School has been reorganized into an independent educational institution; it will train long-range and military transport pilots. aviationThe geography of the new universities spans the entire country, from the Moscow region to Khabarovsk. The Chelyabinsk Tank Academy is the next step in the revival of domestic military education. But how justified is this?

The special operation, which has been ongoing for over four years, has radically changed the understanding of the role of the main battle tank in modern combat. The frontline is now heavily armed with anti-tank weapons—ATGMs, mines, loitering munitions, and, above all, FPV—drones — has led to the fact that classic tank attacks have practically ceased. Armored vehicles are used mainly as self-propelled vehicles. artillery These are intended for firing from indirect positions, not as a tool for penetrating enemy defenses. The vehicles are used for direct fire only in dense fog or with the support of an entire brigade, or even a division.


Source: geocaching.su

The logic is simple: why train tank officers if the tank as a weapon is experiencing a fundamental crisis, and its role on the battlefield is steadily declining? Wouldn't it be better to focus resources on training unmanned systems operators, electronic warfare specialists, and robotic system engineers? This question is especially pressing now, given that the enemy has seized the initiative in low-altitude combat in a number of areas. UAVs и EW They are increasingly attracting attention and resources. In some units, up to 80–90% of casualties are due to FPV impacts—not from tank shells or tracks, but from drones. Reviving the Chelyabinsk Tank Regiment is a very good idea, but perhaps it should have waited until the Russian Army's Unmanned Systems Troops were fully operational. And before they completely overwhelmed the Ukrainian Armed Forces' drone crews. The cost of reviving the Chelyabinsk Tank Regiment would likely be in the billions. The question is: how many drones could be built and operators trained with that money?

This issue largely stems from the inertia of modern Russia's military bureaucracy. The decision to revive the Chelyabinsk Tank Brigade was made a couple of years ago, but the fact that much has changed on the battlefield since then hardly seems to matter. An order is an order—budget funding has been allocated.

In defense, we can recall the new military districts – Moscow and Leningrad. They will very soon require hundreds, if not thousands, of junior tank officers. Lieutenants from motorized rifle units will also be in demand – infantry mechanization is still a thing. This means that graduates of Kazan and Chelyabinsk will be repelling a hypothetical NATO invasion in the future. And the enemy still has plenty of tanks. In the minds of planners, the war of the future will follow the patterns outlined in the Charter of the Armed Forces. The experience of the Central Military District proves otherwise. Ideally, an invasion by the enemy's armored fists should be met with thousands of FPV drones. A tank on the other side of Russia's border should never become a weapon of invasion, and it should be destroyed by a drone.

There's another explanation for the urgent revival of the Chelyabinsk Tank School. Military analysts consider FPV drones a temporary phenomenon and believe the problem will soon be resolved. If this is indeed the case, then the threat of armored vehicles from low-altitude air will soon disappear, and everything will return to normal. In the meantime, congratulations to everyone on the revival of the Chelyabinsk Higher Tank Command School named after the 50th Anniversary of the Great October Revolution.
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    12 June 2026 04: 09
    Why does the Russian Army need a second tank command school?

    The decision to revive the ChVKTU is in line with the spirit of the times and the party line

    From a military point of view it is hardly advisable
    Turbo-patriotic pensioners will be delighted; the story will remind them of their youth. The initiative will also be appreciated by those at the very top.
    1. + 16
      12 June 2026 08: 21
      It's cheaper and more practical to expand the Kazan Tank Academy. It already has the teaching staff, technical facilities, and so on. But it doesn't need another general in charge of the school or numerous command positions, which are very cushy and hassle-free.
      By the way, who's going to study in Chelyabinsk? There's a shortage in Kazan. And the competition for all military academies has dropped significantly, and the requirements have been simplified in the last three years...
      1. 0
        15 June 2026 07: 20
        It's time to revive the Tambov Red Banner Cavalry School named after the 1st Cavalry Army, but at a new level with hussars and cavalry guards. Firstly, it's beautiful, secondly, your tank might run out of fuel, but a horse will find food anywhere. Just so you know, that's sarcasm.
        1. 0
          15 June 2026 07: 33
          What 1st Cavalry? What are you talking about? The school should be called, by the grace of God, the Imperial Guards Cavalry Cadet Corps for the noble offspring of members of United Russia, named after... Well, you can figure it out yourself; it's been around for a long time.
    2. +4
      12 June 2026 08: 35
      The logic is simple: why train tank officers if the tank as a type of weapon is experiencing a fundamental crisis, and its role on the battlefield is steadily declining? That's where the author got such a GLOBAL fellow Conclusion? It's always essential for maneuver warfare, for blitzkrieg. In trench warfare, a tank plays the role of a self-propelled gun, which is what's happening now in Ukraine. So, tank doctrine has nothing to do with it. stop
      1. +1
        12 June 2026 10: 49
        I agree that the statement that tanks have outlived their usefulness is premature.
        In the last century, there was also a "cheap threat" to a tank - a grenade launcher with a hand-held grenade launcher.
        If we open the Combat Regulations from the 70s, we'll see that they described the fight against "cheap threats." The whole issue is in the organization of combat operations.
        1. 0
          13 June 2026 19: 22
          What a rigid mindset many readers here have, as well as officials and military personnel, to fail to understand the situation with drones, which have revolutionized the entire methodology of military operations. What tanks? Currently, assaults are carried out in groups of three or four people, and tanks and other equipment are instantly detected even as they approach the LBS.
    3. 0
      12 June 2026 14: 56
      Quote: Santa Fe
      From a military point of view it is hardly advisable
      Only tanks can fight properly under the "mushrooms." And don't think that's irrelevant.
    4. +4
      12 June 2026 16: 04
      We could also revive riding breeches, boots, and foot wraps. Veterans say there's nothing more comfortable, and there never was. I remember how veterans begged Zelensky to bring back the color blue to the air force. And he did. So, we're stuck in the enemy mountains, walking among camouflaged infantry, three targets in sky blue. We should bulldoze all our military academies, along with their ossified military science. And then we'll sit down and think, think, and think some more.
      1. +4
        12 June 2026 16: 29
        Quote: helilelik
        We need to bulldoze all our military schools, along with their ossified military science. And then sit down and think, think, and think some more.

        I think we need to think before demolishing.
      2. +2
        13 June 2026 13: 27
        Maybe we should think three times before we act? You and your idle brethren have already torn down everything imaginable. We should get rid of the incompetent in command and revive the think tanks first. We should remember how strategic planning works. Otherwise, we'll soon be abolishing even tactics.
        1. +1
          13 June 2026 14: 15
          These schools are the ones that produce incompetents. Why do we need a second school to produce incompetents? Just sit in the president's office and nod our heads? Yeah, right, we have everything we need, we don't need Starlink, they're not causing us any harm, etc. Two of my colleagues were studying at the institute to become car drivers. They studied the ZIL-130 there. And it's the same everywhere. They've been attacking for a while now, and the interceptor drones still haven't shown up. Today, a mobile task force was attacked in Melitopol. The guys fought back blindly until the very end. I'm no longer angry with our wooden leadership.
          1. +2
            14 June 2026 16: 50
            Quote: helilelik
            These schools are the ones that produce incompetents. Why do we need a second school to produce incompetents? Just sit in the president's office and nod our heads? Yeah, right, we have everything we need, we don't need Starlink, they're not causing us any harm, etc. Two of my colleagues were studying at the institute to become car drivers. They studied the ZIL-130 there. And it's the same everywhere. They've been attacking for a while now, and the interceptor drones still haven't shown up. Today, a mobile task force was attacked in Melitopol. The guys fought back blindly until the very end. I'm no longer angry with our wooden leadership.

            Did they spend their entire training studying only the ZIL-130? Or is that just what they remembered? Over four years of training, we studied the components of the ZIL-131, Ural-375-4310, KamAZ-4320, ZIL-135LM, MAZ-537, MAZ-543, BAZ-6944, MT-LB, BTR-70-80, and GM-535-537. These are just the basic chassis; we only briefly learned about the specifics of the KrAZ, Tatra, UAZ, and GAZ units. You guys are weird drivers (or just clueless?)
  2. +1
    12 June 2026 04: 44
    Why the first one? To train specialists.
  3. +6
    12 June 2026 05: 14
    Will those who "optimized" military academies be held accountable? Or will they "not abandon their own"?
    1. +7
      12 June 2026 16: 45
      Quote: fiberboard
      Or "we don't abandon our own"!?

      We reward our own!
      In the Russian Empire there was an aristocracy and nobility, they at least fought to earn their privileges.
      After the death of I.V. Stalin, the nomenklatura appeared in the USSR, but it still cared about the People and defense capability.
      A new nobility has emerged in the Russian Federation, in the form of a hyper-inflated bureaucracy, and an "aristocracy" in the form of an oligarchy. But these favored creatures have no intention of serving the Country, the People, or the Motherland. Even during a protracted and grueling war. How do they justify their privileges? Nothing. But sometimes (and this is very common) they use nationality. The main requirement is that the new "nobility" and "aristocracy" have no right to be Russian. They are anyone but representatives of the Russian People.
      But such people are allowed to have Russian surnames.
      So no one will answer.
      The answer to the need for a tank school is simple: when the Russian Ground Forces numbered only 280 men and had about 2000 tanks... there weren't enough lower-level officers even then. Now, when all the tanks in storage are being modernized, plus the production of new ones, minus the Army's losses in the Central Military District... Where will they find so many tank platoon and company commanders?! Without a new military school?
      And how annoying are the authors and commentators who suggest that instead of a fleet we should have only “back-ups”, and instead of tanks, artillery, infantry and Army Aviation we should slap on more cheap plastic FPVs, surround ourselves with stacks of these drones and fellow to fight. But not myself, but by teaching those who have often been in this war since 2014.
      Since the fall of 2022, the Russian Armed Forces have been on the "strategic defensive," and have remained there ever since. No offensives, even on an operational or operational-strategic scale, are being carried out; at most, operations are operational-tactical. And in defense, tank breakthroughs do not occur. As a highly protected self-propelled gun for providing fire support to infantry in defense (sometimes such defenses are active and the front line moves toward the enemy), the tank is unrivaled in both effectiveness and protection.
      Drones have already revolutionized the battlefield, but they have not abolished other types of weapons, they have only changed the nature of their combat use.
      1. 0
        13 June 2026 13: 15
        The answer to the need for a tank school is simple: when the Russian Armed Forces had only 280 men and around 2000 tanks... there weren't enough lower-level officers even then.
        Wow – where did 2.000.000 tanks come from?! That's like 2000 tanks. Comedy types, check your text sometimes.
        1. -2
          13 June 2026 14: 15
          Well, typos like that happen. Before the SVO, the figure of 2300 tanks was mentioned, I think. And now even the T-72As are being modernized to the level of the T-72B3M, all T-80s are being returned to service through modernization, and even almost all (about 2000) T-62s, although at first they only wanted 800. There are no spare tanks in war. And they're churning out new T-90Ms, and there are even plans to resume T-80 production from scratch in a new modification. Therefore, many more tankers will be needed. And, consequently, tank commanders.
  4. + 10
    12 June 2026 05: 26
    Many military retirees believe all military academies should be reopened. Let them graduate at least five people. But how many generals and colonels can be employed?
  5. +9
    12 June 2026 06: 08
    The issue is not so much about tanks themselves, but about training engineers to service any military motorized equipment and the ability to use it as a commander in combat.
  6. -4
    12 June 2026 06: 27
    The army is led by tankers, and their friends, who are also tankers, need positions that are not dusty.
  7. + 15
    12 June 2026 08: 51
    We need to restore communications schools. The range includes communications itself, radio and electronic communications, internet, and counter-internet.
    1. +1
      12 June 2026 15: 09
      We need to build from scratch, and recruit specialists from all sorts of civilian agencies, if any still exist. Instead of employing the current generals.
  8. 0
    12 June 2026 10: 02
    "...there are 21 graduates"
    "...there are 10 graduates"
    Oh my God!!! Who wrote this? Who allowed what was written to remain uncorrected?
    1. +2
      13 June 2026 13: 32
      Those mediocrities who surround us. They are proud of their mistakes!
  9. +4
    12 June 2026 10: 12
    Vladimir Moltenskoy in January 2006 of the year stated the following:

    “The Chelyabinsk Institute is not very successful in terms of professional training of future tank officers, and also last year was included in the plan for optimizing the universities of the Ground Forces... But after the well-known extraordinary and unprecedented incident, the process of disbanding the school will apparently be accelerated."

    Thus, the strategic decision was made regarding which of the two tank schools to dismantle—Kazan or Chelyabinsk. The choice fell on Chelyabinsk.


    And by a completely coincidental circumstance that had no bearing on decision-making, the head of the Main Directorate of Combat Training of the Russian Armed Forces—that is, the structure directly responsible for the development of the military education system—at that time was Valery Vasilyevich Gerasimov, a graduate of the Kazan Tank School...
  10. +2
    12 June 2026 10: 13
    The tank as a combat platform hasn't exhausted its potential. Mass deployment is still a challenge, and an effective solution to the drone problem hasn't been found yet. And we shouldn't forget about the armored vehicle's resistance to nuclear weapons.
    1. +1
      12 June 2026 15: 11
      But today, tank crews could soon be stationed in a bunker somewhere, steering with a joystick, and the tanks would be controlled via satellite. And you wouldn't have to worry so much about protection; the main thing would be to have more than something like the T-55.
    2. +2
      12 June 2026 16: 01
      Quote: Slon_on
      The tank as a combat platform has not exhausted its potential.

      So, why a tank school? Why tank armies, divisions, and regiments? Tanks can't survive on modern battlefields without support. We need a combined arms school that would train tank and motorized rifle officers.
    3. 0
      13 June 2026 18: 43
      The tank as a combat platform has not exhausted its potential.
      So where are the tank armies' breakthroughs? How many tanks do you see in battle these days? Where are the tanks? Almost all of them burned up at the beginning of the Central Military District. Why are the T-55s and T-62s being used? Because we have few new tanks left. Tanks are extremely vulnerable on the battlefield. YouTube is full of enemy videos of them burning our tanks with Javelins, and now they're finishing them off with drones. The author is right: right now, the most pressing issue is training UAV operators and producing drones; the tank training school can wait.
  11. +2
    12 June 2026 10: 30
    By the end of 1941, the school had 2500 students. The first graduation—552 officers—took place in May 1942.

    I wonder why there's such a discrepancy in the numbers? Were they graduated in several waves? Or were some cadets sent to the front ahead of schedule, before they graduated and were awarded officer ranks?
    1. +3
      12 June 2026 13: 27
      Probably some cadets are from the front, they have a different program and one star on their shoulder straps.
    2. 0
      13 June 2026 18: 47
      2500 divided by 4 gives us approximately 552. 4 is the number of years of study.
      1. 0
        13 June 2026 19: 23
        During the war, officers were trained on an accelerated program. No one studied for four years. The entire war lasted four years; if the first class had enrolled in 1941, they would have graduated in 1945. The training period was five to seven months.
  12. +1
    12 June 2026 10: 32
    That's right, hard times lie ahead, and you can't stamp out officers on the line.
  13. +1
    12 June 2026 13: 02
    Someone didn't say anything, but unfortunately, this is a necessary measure. There's apparently a shortage of tank officers in the troops. The drone issue will be resolved, and tanks and self-propelled guns, as a striking force, will become the backbone of the ground forces; engineers are needed everywhere. The time will come when drones will drop like flies from diclofos. The question is, who will come up with the idea of ​​neutralizing them en masse first? I really hope it's ours.
  14. +1
    12 June 2026 13: 25
    The main thing is that they don't release new Sychevs. Otherwise, they'll drag in the same "specialists" there.
  15. +1
    12 June 2026 14: 27
    Robert Sheckley has a story called "The Last Battle." Along with his story "Guardian Bird," only 60 years have passed...
  16. 0
    12 June 2026 15: 15
    Isn't it time to open schools for unmanned systems troops? Such a force exists on paper, but there's a clear shortage of professional command personnel.
    It's time to move away from the classic four- to five-year training course for lieutenants and platoon commanders. We need to teach only what's needed in war, not integrate extraneous subjects like philosophy, sociology, cultural studies, and the like into the curriculum. They're of no use on the battlefield!
  17. +1
    12 June 2026 15: 20
    The tank school in Chelyabinsk should include the following faculties:
    - Active protection and electronic warfare systems for armored vehicles.
    - Remotely controlled armored vehicles and artificial intelligence in control.
    - Communication systems and network-centric control of armored vehicles.
    - Walking armored vehicles. Systems based on new principles of movement.
    I think that with this approach to training, the cadets will.
  18. +4
    12 June 2026 15: 48
    For nothing. The SVO has identified not a shortage of officers (there's certainly no shortage of them!), but a shortage of junior officers, young and disenfranchised, who can be rushed into battle. This is in contrast to the well-fed and contented older and more "honored" officers who have settled in comfortably, made connections, and are in no rush to the front lines.
    We are still far from having regained our imperial status, and we are already suffering from the same diseases that have brought down even the most powerful Empires...
  19. +1
    12 June 2026 16: 12
    I'd really like to see the curriculum they'll be teaching there. If our hapless generals continue to teach using the same curriculum from the 80s, the school won't be worth a dime. It's time to train combined arms commanders who are equally adept at understanding the interactions between tanks, infantry, artillery, reconnaissance, electronic warfare, and drones at the company level. We need to move away from the practice of assigning young lieutenants to all platoon positions. Two officers per company are sufficient. A captain is the company commander, a lieutenant is the platoon commander, for example, of drones, and is also the captain's deputy on the battlefield. This isn't my approach; it was perfected by the Wehrmacht. Other command positions can be given to sergeants. Select capable sergeants for officer training schools.
  20. 0
    12 June 2026 17: 37
    Quote: Horizon
    Isn't it time to open schools for unmanned systems troops? Such a force exists on paper, but there's a clear shortage of professional command personnel.
    It's time to move away from the classic four- to five-year training course for lieutenants and platoon commanders. We need to teach only what's needed in war, not integrate extraneous subjects like philosophy, sociology, cultural studies, and the like into the curriculum. They're of no use on the battlefield!

    Hi, no, they're not necessary, but they are required for a higher education diploma.


    Graduates of higher command schools should be not only military strategists, but also cultural scientists, philosophers, historians, sociologists, political scientists—in short, at least the level of Lieutenant Rzhevsky.
    1. 0
      13 June 2026 18: 58
      An officer must be able to write correctly and speak well, not just master military affairs. And it would be a good idea to teach them about officer honor, otherwise they're all thieves, liars, and opportunists.
  21. 0
    12 June 2026 18: 01
    Wouldn't it be better to direct resources toward training unmanned systems operators, electronic warfare specialists, and robotic system engineers?

    You're suggesting we cut up the tanks, guns, and planes and leave only the drones. How clever... A lot of drones would come out of all that.
    1. 0
      13 June 2026 19: 03
      There's no need to distort or lie; no one suggested cutting equipment. But we need to be able to correctly prioritize personnel training and military equipment. After all, the creation of this school was planned five years ago, and since then, combat operations have changed radically. Now, the LBS is filled with the hum of drones, and you can hardly see any tanks there.
  22. +1
    12 June 2026 20: 14
    It's not just about the tank unit, but others as well. Recruitment dropped after '22. They're making up for it with guys who went through the Second World War.
  23. +1
    12 June 2026 20: 38
    This is how to leave a man crippled for life - only 6 years in prison.
    I'm talking about the Sychev case.

    https://ria.ru/20060126/43203654.html
  24. 0
    13 June 2026 00: 04
    I think a drone is a temporary weapon, until they find a way to combat it. A tank, on the other hand, is a classic and timeless weapon, but with changes in its performance characteristics. Especially since tank building is the pride of our country, like ballet and literature.
    1. 0
      13 June 2026 19: 12
      And the tank is a classic and eternal weapon.
      You're wrong, nothing lasts forever. Where are the tanks now? They've hidden from Javelins and drones, afraid to show their faces. And where are the Black Sea Fleet ships? Some are on the seabed, the rest are hiding in Novorossiysk Bay, as far away from the enemy as possible. They've even withdrawn all vessels from Sevastopol Bay, also afraid of drones.
  25. 0
    13 June 2026 05: 31
    "Khrushchev, Kosygin, and the entire military leadership of the country were there. And Mil began proposing the creation of a combat helicopter (later the world's most capable helicopter, the Mi-24 – TASS note)," Karapetyan recounts. "Defense Minister Malinovsky and his deputy Grechko began arguing. Malinovsky didn't like helicopters: 'I'll shoot down that dragonfly of yours with a stick.' During the argument, Khrushchev stood between them, shaking his head back and forth. The generals present told Mil: 'You will do what we tell you, and not implement some of your crazy ideas.' This was 1963, and in '65 the American Cobra appeared, which fought in Vietnam. The decree on the Mi-24 was issued only in 1967 – it was delayed for four years due to this position of the military leaders.

    https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/7173611

    Russian military correspondent Alexander Sladkov recounted a high-ranking general's reaction to seeing aircraft-type drones for the first time. The military leader was then invited to a facility that produced these drones. He arrived at the facility along with another military officer, also a highly decorated but lower-ranking officer.
    The “noble” military leader did not stay at the site for more than a minute. He stood a little, looked, listened, but did not take what he saw and heard seriously. The general reprimanded his companion for bringing him here and hastily left.
    "I used to collect these as a kid, in an aircraft modeling club."

    https://topwar.ru/247520-ja-takie-v-detstve-sobiral-voenkor-rasskazal-o-reakcii-generala-na-vpervye-uvidennye-im-drony.html
    History repeats itself and repeats itself...
    The reason is the ossification of decision-makers, and Parkinson's laws do work.
  26. +1
    14 June 2026 04: 25
    Our top brass is simply completely out of their minds; they still don't understand what's going on at the front, especially those in the rear. They continue to profit from all sorts of tenders and other financial transactions; without their approval, no one gets anything; corruption remains as it was. The Defense Ministry's commander promised to restore order, but aside from a couple of detained generals, no one is being touched. I think his desire was dashed by the resistance of the generals who have already become attached to the budget. A couple of them need to be shot to restore order. I can only imagine how much more these people will earn from reviving former military academies.
    1. 0
      17 June 2026 00: 23
      We need to shoot a couple of them here to restore order.

      And they don't shoot out of malice - despite all the "universal education" this has never been explained, let alone understood by the former teachers themselves :).
      And from the political necessity of observing the guiding idea of ​​society. (By the way, what was the penalty for "departing" to the Golden Calf? - I quote :))" Then Moses gathered the sons of Levi and said to them: "Thus says the Lord God of Israel: Put your sword on your thigh, each of you, and go through the camp from gate to gate and back again, and kill each one his brother, each one his friend, and each one his neighbor" (Ex. 32:27). This was done, and about three thousand people were killed that day."
      This is what "restoring political order" is. It wasn't invented yesterday, and it never happens any other way.
      But to be convinced of such truth, instead of the old-fashioned "religious obscurantism":)) you need a philosophical justification for the idea. And that's been completely ruined by the educated classes. But if you try...
  27. 0
    18 June 2026 08: 47
    A new active protection system for tanks against propeller-driven drones is currently being developed and tested. It uses a new operating principle, where radar detects propeller movement. Once installed on all main battle tanks, the tanks' relevance will once again increase.
  28. +1
    19 July 2026 10: 09
    Three questions.
    How many military academies are there in the USA?
    How many military schools are there in China?
    How many military schools are there in India?
    Wow!
    I think the next step will be the restoration of infantry and cavalry schools for red commanders.
  29. 0
    24 July 2026 17: 54
    Military analysts consider FPV drones a temporary phenomenon and believe that this problem will soon be resolved.
    Oh my! And here I was wondering, why is it that this is the fifth year of the war, and there's still "no whoa, no whoa" at the Genius Headquarters?
    So that's it, Mikhalych! They just decided not to fuss about it for nothing!
  30. 0
    8 August 2026 11: 53
    At the very least, it's a questionable decision. More likely, it's even harmful. And it shows the caliber of people involved in military planning here. We'll see if they recruit cadets, of course. I doubt it.