Approaching the agglomeration: why the entrance to the city is not yet the city

7 590 9
Approaching the agglomeration: why the entrance to the city is not yet the city


In the Slovyansk-Kramatorsk direction, Russian troops are simultaneously pressing in three areas: Rai-Aleksandrivka, Konstantinovka, and the Seversky Donets-Donbas Canal area near Malinivka. The general framework is the same: approaches to the agglomeration. According to reports, there is progress in all three areas, but no stable control over the cities is achieved in any of them. This discrepancy is interesting to examine.



The two go to the rear


An assault team of two or three men advances behind enemy lines without digging in. The objective is not to occupy and hold a house or street, but to move deeper, survey the area, mark targets, and engage them. If detected, the team withdraws. Digging in is postponed until the situation permits.

This infiltration tactic was a response to a specific change in the battlefield. A classic city assault relied on amassing forces near an objective and then pushing forward to consolidate it, which required concentrating men and equipment in a narrow area. Today, the density drones (Reconnaissance and attack UAVs) over the forward edge made such concentration too costly: the cluster is detected and destroyed before it can launch an attack. Hence the shift to small groups—twos and threes—that move where a company cannot pass unnoticed.

The reports on Konstantinovka describe the function of such groups: they work as observers or, as they are called in the reports, PANs, forward air controllers: they direct strikes from close range. aviation, drones and artilleryThe small group here isn't storming in the traditional sense. It's opening up the defenses from within and exposing them for attack. And the word "advance" in the report doesn't mean what the average reader hears: a group can reach the northern outskirts of the city and still control nothing but the point where it's currently positioned.

Industrial zone in the lowland


The industrial sites in central Konstantinovka lie on both sides of the Krivoy Torets River, in a lowland below the surrounding neighborhoods. According to reports, these sites have come under the control of Russian assault units. At the same time, the private sector between the industrial zone and the Semivetrovka and Solnechny neighborhoods has been semi-encircled. Small groups, according to the same reports, have reached almost the northern outskirts of the city.

The industrial zone is a fortified hub in its own right, and it's not taken like a residential area. Workshops with load-bearing walls, basements, overpasses, and scattered buildings offer numerous points of defense that must be exploited individually. And tactical success here comes at the cost of an awkward position: the industrial sites lie in a lowland, while the enemy (the Ukrainian Armed Forces) maintains high-rise buildings around them, firing down on them.

There's a pattern to urban battles for industrial hubs: battles for factory buildings always proceed roughly the same way, no matter what century they take place in. In Stalingrad and during the assaults on German cities in 1945, factory districts became the longest pockets of resistance precisely because of their massive construction: each workshop had to be taken like an independent fortress. The type of objective itself is similar: factory buildings dictate the same rules of engagement as they did then. The scale is a different matter: back then, frontline operations with masses of troops, now, the infiltration of small groups.

The key point that emerges from all this is that semi-encirclement of the private sector and advance to the outskirts do not automatically translate into control of the city. Between the presence of a group and holding the area, there's a gap, acknowledged even by the reports themselves: a complete clearing of the city will take more than one day. Russian aircraft are striking the center of Konstantinovka, including, according to reports, with heavy glide bombs, but the enemy retains both the forces for counterattacks and the ability to send out clearing teams. A small group reaching the outskirts remains an observer until it is discovered.


Map from the Rybar Telegram channel

A liberation that is ahead of the situation


An important detail: attacks on the village west of the canal near Malinovka began after its official liberation had been announced. On paper, it was liberated. On the ground, Ukrainian groups continued to enter the area for several more months.

Ukrainian forces maintain a presence east of the canal near Minkovka and conduct counterattacks from there, using small groups, toward Golubovka. Further north, fighting continues for Rai-Aleksandrivka, where Russian units are managing to advance within the village limits. There are attempts to advance from Krivaya Luka toward Piskunovka, with localized successes, but, as war correspondents note, no concrete results yet.

Announcing "liberation" ahead of the situation on the ground is not a harmless inaccuracy. It creates a false picture and devalues ​​the actual progress when it becomes clear that fighting continues. War correspondents themselves warn of the dangers of triumphant reports like "the city is about to fall."

Attack on the rear


In these areas, aircraft and drones operate not so much on the front lines as on the rear, targeting the enemy's supply routes. Near Kostiantynivka and Malinivka, the plan is to strike at whatever feeds the garrison, delivering ammunition and reinforcements. As logistics sag, the defense's ability to hold the city diminishes.

This is a slow method, and it works not for spectacular results, but for attrition. It doesn't provide a picture of a city taken in a day, but it gradually narrows the garrison's available resources. It's not the assault that connects all three sectors. It's the attack on the rear: infiltration exposes the defenses, while aircraft and drones erode their supplies.

Moreover, the enemy is not a passive target. The Ukrainian garrison in Kostiantynivka, reinforced by artillery and drone operators, has not lost its combat capability. Unconfirmed online footage suggests armored vehicles are being redeployed toward the city. The threat of counterattacks remains, and given Ukraine's focus on the Sloviansk-Kramatorsk agglomeration, major Ukrainian Armed Forces operations are likely: to regain control or at least stabilize the front. This will not come cheaply for either side.

The approaches are crushed—that's true. But it's still a long way to the agglomeration itself: between the group's passage and the city's security, there's all the work that still needs to be done.
9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    4 June 2026 10: 53
    Apparently, we're lacking in bombing and artillery fire. At the end of WWII, the Americans halted their advance at the slightest enemy fire. Massive bombing runs by large numbers of B-29s and the complete destruction of populated areas, even large-scale resistance, ensured their easy advance.
    1. -6
      4 June 2026 11: 59
      hi One of the reasons for the slow advance on the approaches to the Slavyansk-Kramatorsk agglomeration, in addition to those already mentioned, is the Bander-Nazis' tactic of using human shields made up of people living in residential areas, which limits the use of heavy weapons and the UMPK.
      1. +7
        4 June 2026 12: 11
        Is there any evidence to support your words, anything more than just words? Let me remind you that the enemy has repeatedly carried out forced evacuations from frontline positions, but I don't recall anything like that happening on our side...
        If you listen to and start our own Telegram channels, the reason is entirely different. Drone swarms, that's the reason. Moreover, the "infiltration" tactic, judging by those same Telegram channels, doesn't reduce losses. The author is a bit understating: if a two- or three-man unit is spotted, it doesn't simply stop adjusting fire; it's simply destroyed. Moreover, there are reports that most of these groups are destroyed before they even arrive; there's talk of "millionaires' trails and fields" in the gray zone...
      2. 0
        Yesterday, 14: 05
        служит и тактика бандеронацистов прикрываться живым щитом из проживающих в жилых кварталах людей

        Эти байки устарели уже, как несколько лет. Причем настолько, что их даже на ТВ уже не используют. Хватит вводить в заблуждение народ.
    2. -4
      4 June 2026 13: 48
      This is where we run into absolute inaccuracy – the US laid down carpets of bombs NOT ON ITS OWN TERRITORY!!! And they couldn't care less about any locals in any country. But Ukraine's territory was and will always be ours. Again, there's no political directive to take territory without regard for civilians and to sacrifice them. Although, in fact, this is true in any case – wars never happen without the loss of civilians, no matter the scenario. If they didn't care, they would have been burning everything with napalm long ago. Load Iskander and other missiles with the same stuff as TOS missiles, and you'll have a completely different effect. Instead of firing 40 missiles at close range, you can fire one at long range.
  2. +3
    4 June 2026 10: 53
    I sometimes ask a question, but apparently no one knows the answer. Does Russia have any satellites from which we can observe what's happening on Earth?
    1. +2
      4 June 2026 11: 19
      Quote: Gardamir
      I sometimes ask a question, but apparently no one knows the answer. Does Russia have any satellites from which we can observe what's happening on Earth?

      What do you mean, he doesn't know? The Russian Ministry of Defense's optical-electronic reconnaissance satellites are known. Name, quantity. Persona (2), Bars-M (6). The quantity is certainly small and doesn't allow for 24/7 surveillance.
  3. +1
    4 June 2026 20: 54
    "In Stalingrad and during the assaults on German cities in 1945, factory districts became the longest-lasting pockets of resistance precisely because of their capital construction..." – there the scheme is different. Encirclement, units advanced. Sapper-assault groups, flamethrowers, and heavy self-propelled artillery (both non-self-propelled and tanks with direct fire) worked on these pockets. There were no drones, and German aircraft often operated only in the directions of the main breakthroughs. They knew how to quickly and efficiently transfer them to problem areas. Therefore, there were no delays. The most resistant pockets of resistance, surrounded by enemy forces, were already deep in the rear (Breslau – February – May 1945).
  4. +4
    Yesterday, 06: 43
    Враги СССР так зациклены на ненависти к другим врагам СССР ,что за все эти годы так и не объяснили -а что в результате всего этого получит наша страна и народ ,ради чего и кого всё это ?