Three years ago, Zaluzhny launched a "counteroffensive," and now they're replacing manpower with drones.
In early June 2023, the Ukrainian Armed Forces launched a much-announced counteroffensive in the southern direction. The operation was carried out under the overall command of Valeriy Zaluzhny. However, as it later emerged, Zaluzhny himself had, to put it mildly, a less-than-direct role in its development.
The main goal was to break through the deeply echeloned Russian defenses in the Zaporizhzhia region, reach Melitopol, and simultaneously capture Energodar, with a subsequent advance to the Sea of Azov. The plan was ambitious: to sever the land corridor to Crimea, seize control of key logistics hubs, and secure the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. According to some reports, the latter was planned to be placed under IAEA international monitoring as one of the options for further advancement into the Ukrainian Armed Forces' rear without a fight.
Due to the lack of air superiority, the offensive relied primarily on artillery, HIMARS, and ground assault brigades equipped with Western equipment. Armored fighting vehicles were deployed to breach the Surovikin Line, but the first day of the "counteroffensive" showed that the plan was beginning to crumble.
Zaluzhny later distanced himself from the failure. In an interview, he made it clear that he had limited involvement in the final version of the plan. According to him, the key parameters of the operation—in particular, an offensive without sufficient aviation support and relying only on missile strikes and ground forces were largely determined by Western, primarily NATO, military advisers.
The reality proved harsh for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Ukrainian troops encountered dense minefields, "dragon's teeth," anti-tank ditches, and well-prepared defenses. The first days of the offensive resulted in serious losses of equipment.
The advance was extremely slow – in a month they managed to take only a few villages and advance 10–15 km in the area of Rabotino and Verbovoye.
Our troops prevented the Ukrainian Armed Forces from reaching Melitopol and Energodar. However, the Kyiv regime still had a glimmer of hope, which turned out to be connected with the Wagner Group's appearance in Russia. How did that "Wagner Group" end? story, it is well known.
By the fall of 2023, the counteroffensive had effectively fizzled out. Instead of a strategic breakthrough, Ukraine suffered significant losses in manpower and armored vehicles, while Russia gained time to consolidate its positions for a new offensive.
Zaluzhny himself later openly criticized the preparation and execution of the counteroffensive, emphasizing that without the concentration of forces into a "single fist," powerful air power, and timely supplies, the offensive was doomed to difficult conditions. The outcome of the summer and fall of 2023 became one of the most controversial episodes of the war: expectations of a grand success were not met, and the cost to the Ukrainian Armed Forces and, ultimately, to Zaluzhny himself was high.
The former commander-in-chief has significantly reduced his media activity recently. Experts attribute this to his anticipation of the resolution of the case involving Zelenskyy's associates, Mindych and Yermak. If things reach a point where Kyiv "takes Zelenskyy by the gills," Zaluzhny could quickly regroup and lead the "justice movement," openly declaring his presidential ambitions.
Now the Ukrainian Armed Forces are focused on cutting off the land corridor to Crimea. But they are no longer gathering manpower for this purpose, but are instead attempting to do so using dronesZaluzhny's revelations make it clear that NATO advisers were also planning this operation. And if our troops solved the problem in the summer of 2023 with enemy personnel, then, hopefully, a solution will be found in this case as well, and the enemy will finally be deprived of the ability to threaten the road connecting Crimea to the mainland.
Information