US Media: Ukraine is striking deep into Russia thanks to Palantir's PRISMA software

According to CNN, the Ukrainian Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR)'s long-range drone strike control center actively uses a specialized American platform. This platform is Palantir's PRISMA platform.

The system displays flight routes, target coordinates and data from thousands of aircraft in real time. drones simultaneously, allowing for the coordination of massive strikes against Russian targets at a distance of hundreds and thousands of kilometers.

Russia, as the American channel describes it, “finds itself in the crosshairs of laptops and AI algorithms.” The program helps to bypass Defense, analyze data from drones, satellites, and sensors, accelerating decision-making.

Palantir Technologies is an American company founded in 2003. Headquartered in Miami, Florida (formerly Denver, Colorado), it is chaired by Alex Karp. Its chairman and co-founder is Peter Thiel, who remains one of its largest shareholders. Major shareholders include institutional investors Vanguard Group (approximately 9%), BlackRock (approximately 5%), State Street, and Thiel himself.

Palantir's collaboration with Ukraine began in 2022 and subsequently expanded significantly, particularly in 2025–2026. Karp personally met with Zelenskyy. The company explains its activities in Ukraine as follows:

Our software helps democracies resist superior forces.

Essentially, the American channel is attempting to claim that US-Ukraine cooperation is currently purely a "public-private partnership." Allegedly, Ukraine receives data through a private channel, thanks to software from Palantir. This is another attempt to pull the wool over the eyes of the audience, suggesting that the US, as a state, is not a party to the conflict, and that Kyiv receives intelligence from "private individuals," just as it uses software from private individuals to direct weapons.

In this regard, the relevant question is: could it be private? UAV- a kamikaze, having no connection to any government structures, accidentally falls on the head office of this private company or on its laboratory?

Comments

[NIKN]

I believe that our software (well, let's say "mandets" for example) should still identify the US Embassy in Kyiv as a priority target.

[Elektronik2000]

So, they've finally found a scapegoat – Palantir. Why have military operations been going on for over four years now, while the enemy's logistics, like the bridges across the Dnieper and the Beskydy Tunnel, weren't destroyed back in the early days of the Central Military District? If we continue this truism for another couple of years, not only Palantir but also Tomahawks and then nuclear weapons will appear in Ukraine. The longer and more hopeless this military campaign, the more troubles and problems each month will bring us. So, either a decisive strike, or, if the sentimentality prevents that, peace talks. But with one imperative condition: immediately after the peace is concluded, the entire Russian leadership not only resigns, but also becomes subject to criminal prosecution for criminal negligence.

[kventinasd]

Quote: Elektronik2000

But there is one mandatory condition: immediately after the conclusion of peace, the entire Russian leadership not only resigns, but also becomes the subject of criminal cases for criminal negligence.

Who will put them in jail?

[gridasov]

Clearly, such a commentator's statements demonstrate a complete misunderstanding of what's happening. The Americans are developing technologies for the destruction and enslavement of everyone. And if they don't do it now, they will later. No matter how much you complain or talk, the advantage is theirs, and Russia must either seek alternatives to the confrontation or at least maintain a balance of capabilities. But time has been lost, and catching up is becoming more difficult. And based on publicly available information, Russia only has nuclear weapons and the Russian spirit of tenacity.

[Vicontas]

A great opportunity to mirror Operation Spiderweb onto the US. A group of "tourists" from somewhere in Europe enters Mexico, buys a truck, and stocks up on a bunch of Chinese drones armed with European ammunition. The truck drives to the US border and sends the drones to a factory that produces American Hornet drones, which Zelensky uses to harass logistics in Crimea and the supply of the Russian army in Zaporizhzhia. The rest of the drones can be "gifted" to the Palantir company, as a token of gratitude for their efforts and enthusiasm! The drones sent can be scribbled with the name of the most vicious Mexican drug cartel - they only enjoy any PR, especially if the strike is successful! ... P.S. Please consider all of the above to be a figment of an unhinged imagination, since the Russian leadership would never dare to commit such sacrilege! Actor V. Gaft wrote about his acquaintance: "There is a lot of masculine in him, but There is no masculine END in him!" I think this production characteristic is quite suitable for the Russian leadership....

[gridasov]

Few people understand, or even attempt to grasp, that Palantir is a completely cutting-edge technology or an attempt to work with large data sets. It relies on a system for collecting information from all sources, including, in the military context, space satellites and other sources, as used in the Prism project. However, these progressive solutions rely on outdated or completely absent mathematical foundations for building a big data system and supporting hardware. Even during the Zvorykin project, which was quite some time ago, we positioned the matrix algorithm and its support through a multipolar transistor. And it's clear that, just as in the time of the pharaohs, the advent of electrical devices was premature, it's apparently too early to talk about the mathematics that can support an accurate and efficient technology for distributing ultra-big data, which is the foundation of real AI.

[Alexander Rasmukhambetov]

It seems like no one is planning to catch up, judging by our economy.

[Andrey Loginov]

Who missed this? Nuclear weapons versus AI... a dubious argument (in 10 years, it won't be an argument at all). And the spirit of perseverance could also use the spirit of wisdom to help. But the spirit of conceit and its ilk needs to be driven out with a dirty broom.

[Boris Sergeev]

Ushakov, presidential aide:

Many people use the word "agreement" [about the results of the Anchorage summit]. I would perhaps say "understanding" more precisely.

"Understood was indeed reached about what each side would do in the context of resolving the Ukrainian conflict. The Americans promised to fulfill their part of these understandings, but, as I understand it, they encountered a number of difficulties, primarily related to Kyiv's behavior."

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Elektronik2000

Why have military operations been going on for over four years now, and why weren't the enemy's logistics, such as the bridges across the Dnieper and the Beskid Tunnel, destroyed in the first days of the Central Military District?

It's all the same old story... Fulfilling your desires requires forces and resources we simply don't have. Don't think you're smarter than everyone else. Destroying a railway tunnel requires B-2 bombers with GBU-57 bombs. And you have to strike regularly, preventing them from clearing the rubble. But we don't have that in our arsenal.

[Evgeny64]

Well, yes, but the "Dagger" isn't enough, two, three, etc. Its kinetic energy is enough to penetrate a 10-meter layer of soil. It won't work, you can use the "Oreshnik" missile, not exactly on target, but regular strikes once a week, I think, will help, and at the same time, they'll hollow out all the surrounding infrastructure.
The issue here is more a matter of desire and fear of missing, of hitting potential "partners" too close.
And there they can confiscate not only Golikova's dacha

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Evgeny64

you can call it "Nut"

Its accuracy is plus or minus a hundred meters. Hitting the Oreshnik on a railway embankment is certainly possible with a few tries, but the consequences of such a hit will be cleared up in less than a day.

[Elektronik2000]

He who does not want always looks for reasons.
Do you know what completely destroys all your arguments?
The fact that we didn't even try to impact key logistics points. There were almost no attempts to attack the bridges over the Dnieper or the key road and rail crossings from Europe.

If, instead of the senseless pounding of Kyiv's power substations this winter—which was halted at Trump's request just when it could have finally had an effect—all those resources had been spent on attacking vehicles approaching road and rail bridges, as well as the bridges themselves, everything might have been completely different. The Ukrainian Armed Forces could have concocted a fairy tale about the invulnerability of Russian oil refineries, but they are trying and searching for solutions, and we are seeing the results.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Elektronik2000

There were almost no attempts to attack the bridges across the Dnieper and the key road and rail crossings from Europe.

How? Our Aerospace Forces have demonstrated their incompetence. And they should have done it. Destroying a bridge is no trivial task. As a reminder, the Americans spent seven years destroying the strategic Ham Giong ("Dragon's Mouth") Bridge in Vietnam. All they managed was to collapse one span. Do you remember the outcome of the war?

[Semyon Sukhov]

Because the Heimers destroyed the Antonovsky Bridge, the Russian Armed Forces were forced to urgently "take up more advantageous positions" and flee Kherson.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Semyon Sukhov

Because the Heimers destroyed the Antonovsky Bridge, the Russian Armed Forces were forced to urgently "take up more advantageous positions" and flee Kherson.

You're wrong. We had to withdraw because supplies were routed along one road—the Antonov Bridge or the pontoon bridge brought in after the bridge was damaged. And that road was under fire. So, the mere fact that the bridge was disabled by hundreds of precision strikes doesn't mean we had to withdraw. The pontoon bridge was quickly reassembled. But constant shelling prevented repairs to the bridge, and the need to interrupt transit led to equipment and supplies piling up along the banks, which were also under attack.

[Elektronik2000]

You're experiencing selective memory loss. The pontoon bridge was never assembled, which is unsurprising given the maximum length restrictions for a pontoon bridge and the width of the Dnieper at that location. Instead, a ferry crossing was used, with pontoons towed from one bank to the other by tugboats. Only much later was a continuous crossing constructed of interconnected barges able to be created. It's only possible to estimate how much lower the capacity of such crossings is than that of a conventional bridge—roughly 50-100 times, making supplying the group and the entire city absolutely impossible. Do you even have any idea what the maximum length of a pontoon crossing is due to its limitations, the number of pontoons in the pontoon parks remaining in Ukraine on the Dnieper, the number of pontoons in all NATO countries' pontoon parks, and the capacity of pontoon crossings? I'm genuinely amazed when people who have absolutely no idea what they're discussing begin to eagerly use arguments they don't even understand.

[Elektronik2000]

Destroying a bridge is a trivial task—I say this as a bridge engineer; we were taught exactly this at the military department of Leningrad Institute of Railway Transport for several years. Cable-stayed bridges (and there are several of them across the Dnieper) are almost completely destroyed by a hit to the pylon; one Iskander missile is enough. The bridges in Zaporizhzhia are within range of FAB-3000s and UMPKs, so close are they to the front line. Let's start with them? Nope, they're not even trying. It was those stupid Americans who spent seven years hammering away at the bridge, and we're smart; we won't even try, in case we accidentally hit one.

[Evgeny64]

Well, in the 60s, the dumb Americans may have spent 7 years hammering out a bridge, but in Iran they demolished several bridges in a matter of days, which immediately cast doubt on the opinion of local "experts" about the non-trivial nature of this task.
Although maybe their grenades... oh, maybe the rockets are the wrong type, or they have different TNT? Or can't our missilemen hit a target the size of a football field?
I think the conclusions are obvious and the most harmless of them is “we are not like that.”

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Evgeny64

In Iran, they demolished several bridges in a few days.

The news reports mention one. It's unclear, however, why—no one's sending aid to Iran, there's no ground operation, and there's no need to isolate the combat zone, since the Americans are just bombing anyway.
By the way, the same thing happened in Yugoslavia, only there were NATO allies on all sides.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Evgeny64

and in Iran they demolished several bridges in a matter of days, which immediately called into question the opinion of local "experts" about the non-trivial nature of this task

Now remember how they did it. It was the air force. Several F-15Es flew in and destroyed the bridges with smart bombs. Are our Aerospace Forces flying behind the front lines?

[Evgeny64]

Now remember what the distance is to the bridges in Zaporizhzhia and what is the range of bombs from the UMPK
There you don't even need to fly for LBS.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Elektronik2000

are almost completely destroyed when hitting the pylon

That's right. All that's left is to get there.

Quote: Elektronik2000

one Iskander is enough

Again, if he hits it. But most likely not.

Quote: Elektronik2000

Bridges in Zaporizhzhia are generally within reach of the FAB-3000 with UMPK

This product is so "precise" that it is necessary to attach a 3-ton bomb in order to compensate for a miss of tens of meters with its power.
It will be possible to stun fish in the Dnieper.

Quote: Elektronik2000

We're smart, we won't even try.

They actually tried. They attacked the Dniester bridges in Zatoka and Mayaki. The results were zero. What damage they managed to inflict was repaired.

[Elektronik2000]

The accuracy of the UMPK is from 8 to 15 meters, which is quite enough to hit a bridge 50-60 meters wide, even more than enough.
A cable-stayed bridge is an extremely fragile structure. A precise hit to the pylon isn't necessary. A simple hit to the deck, damaging a few cables, will result in the bridge being completely disabled. It will be impossible to determine the exact extent of the structural weakness, and no one will be able to authorize the bridge to be used at full load. Cables for such bridges are a rare commodity, requiring months of custom manufacturing rather than being readily available in a warehouse. Replacing even a few cables will require closing the bridge for months.

The attacks on the Dniester bridges in Zatoka led to serious logistical problems, lengthy disruptions to rail traffic, and the repairs took a long time. The bridges are still not 100% restored, and there are restrictions on traffic. This is far from a zero-sum outcome, but if we follow your twisted logic, then attacking the power plants and substations makes no sense at all; they're being restored, too, and even faster than the bridges. :)

So, you can try as hard as you like to justify the mysterious inviolability of the bridges across the Dnieper, the Beskydy Tunnel, and the 750 kV substations, but with each passing year, it becomes increasingly difficult for you to do so, and the number of those who agree with your clumsy arguments is decreasing.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Elektronik2000

The accuracy of the UMPK is from 8 to 15 meters

According to the developer? Then why did we switch to a 3-ton caliber? Let me remind you, the NATO KAB is 225 kg in caliber. More than ten times smaller. It's a mass-produced munition. But it turns out we need 3 tons to destroy a bunker...

Quote: Elektronik2000

The attacks on the Dniester bridges in Zatoka led to serious logistical problems, lengthy interruptions in rail transport, and repairs took a long time; the bridges are still not 100% restored, and there are restrictions on traffic.

Why are you trying to calm yourself down? What does this give you? If the attacks were effective, they would have continued; otherwise, why start them and waste valuable ammunition? Or do you think our headquarters are full of idiots? You're like those Germans after Versailles who insisted, "We were winning, but we were forbidden to do so; there was treachery in the rear!"

[Elektronik2000]

You're the one who's reassuring yourself, "They know better than us, and if they're not doing it, it means they can't." I don't think the staff at headquarters are idiots; most likely, there are very intelligent people there. It's just that all their proposals for such attacks are blocked by the highest military and political leadership. And they're even more perplexed than I am, because they were taught in military schools and academies that the most important and primary priority is the destruction of enemy logistics. Your arguments would be at least somewhat plausible if our military at least attempted to strike strategic bridges across the Dnieper. But all we've heard about is the Kakhovka Reservoir dam, most likely destroyed by Ukraine, and the Antonov Bridge, which it also disabled, and which was later destroyed even more severely by Russian forces during their retreat. That's all. No more attempts to strike bridges across the Dnieper. So you can try as much as you like to justify obvious logical inconsistencies that are becoming increasingly glaring to more and more Russian citizens with each passing month.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Elektronik2000

If only our military had at least tried to strike at the strategic bridges across the Dnieper

OK. Ukraine's air defense system is a huge hindrance to us. How many attempts have been made to neutralize it? I'm talking about the air defenses at rear facilities that prevent the Tu-22M3 from dropping concrete-piercing bombs on a railway tunnel? Or will you also say, "Our Aerospace Forces would have done it, but their hands are tied..."
In general, this is a comfortable position.

[Elektronik2000]

Don't try to misrepresent it. The bridges in Zaporizhzhia are completely within range of our FAB-3000s and UPMKs, about 30 km from the front line, and strikes with such weapons at such a distance were carried out regularly. But never on the bridges in Zaporizhzhia. What a strange Ukrainian air defense system, it sometimes doesn't interfere, sometimes it doesn't, right? And why did you immediately mention the riskiest option during the attacks on the Beskyd Tunnel? The most vulnerable point in the tunnel is the entrance. I'm not even talking about the "Oreshnik" missile, which it turns out we're only testing. Let's at least regularly attack the access roads to the tunnel with Gerani. 80-100 kg of explosives will disable the roads for at least a couple of days, and if before the attack they drop a container of antipersonnel mines from, say, Gerani and repeat such attacks every day, then, to the detriment of the families of the repairmen, such repairs could drag on for a long time. And if, instead of hammering at transformer boxes and ballistic missiles, they regularly hammer at the tunnel entrance, then regular logistics through the tunnel can be said goodbye for a very long time.

[Wind]

That's also interesting. Can nuclear weapons help suppress air defense systems? A pinpoint hit on the radar isn't necessary. Damaging something within a 2-3 km radius would be enough.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Vent

That's also interesting. Can nuclear weapons help suppress air defense systems? A pinpoint hit on the radar isn't necessary. Damaging something within a 2-3 km radius would be enough.

Yes, a nuclear explosion will at least disrupt the operation of the radar and create gaps through which aircraft can enter and attack targets without warning.

[Wind]

Quote: Puncher

work towards goals

That's exactly what I'm talking about. You're writing about how nuclear weapons (tactical) can break through the front. It can be broken through by achieving dominance in the big skies (it's impossible in the small skies). And dominance can be achieved using nuclear weapons, attacks on logistics, and demoralizing effects. It will have an effect. The entire Soviet Union's strategy was geared toward this. The other question, of course, is that this will unleash the use of nuclear weapons on the US. And many in the world won't be very happy about that.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Vent

Here you write how nuclear weapons (tactical) can break through the front

Quote: Vent

The entire strategy of the USSR was aimed at this.

You're absolutely right about that. The Soviet Union's strategy for using tactical nuclear weapons was to clear the way for tank columns to reach major European ports in order to prevent the landing of US troops. Any delay would have meant the US would have landed troops in Europe, drawing the US into a war and then necessitating a nuclear war with its main strategic nuclear forces. Therefore, the use of tactical nuclear weapons is possible today, provided we quickly reach the Polish border. But at the moment, we don't have the forces or resources to do so. Or rather, it's impossible to concentrate them, as this would immediately trigger drone strikes.

[Wind]

Quote: Puncher

Today, the use of tactical nuclear weapons is possible, provided that there is a quick exit to the Polish border.

Look, why was a quick breakthrough and access to the coast so important to the USSR? Only because of the United States. So that there wouldn't be a foothold for deploying forces arriving from overseas, as was the case during World War II. Now the situation is a little different. Europe, even if the front is broken, which do you think will enter the war? What about Europe? Poland or Romania? I seriously doubt the elites of those countries would want to become like Ukraine. The Poles, of course, are very arrogant, but for what purpose? To extract money from the Western bourgeoisie as an outpost against the hordes from the east, and that's all. They really don't want to see their country on the battlefield and will not allow it under any circumstances, even if the bourgeoisie further west begs them to. Which means there's no need to rush.
Disrupting their rail logistics and simultaneously capturing the vast expanse of sky will lead to the collapse of the prepared defensive line and a breakthrough. And if the main cadre forces are destroyed (encircled, routed during retreat), then it's game over. They have nowhere to recruit another army, and they won't send one from overseas. And the West will agree to any peace.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Vent

Europe, even if the front is broken, what do you think will enter the war?

To answer this question, it's enough to recall February 2022 and the EU's reaction to the outbreak. Ukraine was abandoned from day one. If today, within a month (and most likely less) after the tactical nuclear weapons strike, a westward advance begins, then, of course, nothing will happen except anger and new sanctions. BUT! If all this ends in fizzling, we will regret our decision.

Quote: Vent

And the West will agree to any peace

You've certainly described everything beautifully. But you're forgetting geography. The Dnieper River is a natural barrier to westward advancement. Crossing such an obstacle is a tremendously difficult task. Considering that over the past four years we've destroyed a huge number of pontoon bridges (and the Dnieper is no Seversky Donets), and the Ukrainians will certainly blow up all the crossings, everything along the Dnieper could come to a standstill. That's the ideal scenario. Therefore, tactical nuclear weapons are not a lifesaver.

[Wind]

Forcing the Dnieper is difficult if the defense is prepared and there are forces to defend it. Yes, then it's completely impossible. But if the enemy forces are defeated on the left bank, then who will defend the right bank? It stretches for hundreds of kilometers. Therefore, the main issue is defeating their forces on the left bank. And this, in my opinion, depends on breaking through the front. Which, in turn, means seizing the big sky and disrupting the enemy's logistics. The question is how to do this. The Tiao option.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Vent

But if the enemy troops are defeated on the left bank

The term "defeated" doesn't mean "killed." Defeated means retreating. The likelihood that significant forces will be withdrawn beyond the Dnieper is far from zero.

Quote: Vent

Tiao option.

It's very risky and requires a tremendous amount of preparation. I believe this is no longer possible in the current situation. We don't have enough equipment and artillery, and the troops are simply not ready for such a war. We need training in how to operate in contaminated areas, how to decontaminate, what medications to use, and so on. People will simply be afraid of radiation, because a drone might miss, but radiation never misses. This is based on human fear, not fact. Actual contamination will be low and won't be as deadly as it seems, but people have been scared of it for too long.

[Wind]

Quote: Puncher

The likelihood that significant forces will be withdrawn beyond the Dnieper is not zero.

I agree. But, firstly, if they're retreating, it means they're disorganized and suffering heavy losses in both personnel and equipment. And, secondly, they need to organize a defense along the entire Dnieper River, not just a small section of the Kherson region; that's much more difficult. So, forcing a crossing is a very real option.

Quote: Puncher

Very risky and requiring colossal preparation.

Of course, it's risky; this is a battle, not a punching bag. They fight back, and the enemy doesn't want to die. So no one can guarantee anything. In my opinion, it's time to play our trump cards. And what about our tactical nuclear weapons and ballistics? It's like if the Germans hadn't had machine guns in World War I, but we had. And they'd tell us, "Oh, no, weapons of mass destruction."

Quote: Puncher

It is necessary to train personnel on how to operate in contaminated areas, how to conduct decontamination, what medications to use, etc.

We have a whole branch of the military dedicated to NBC protection. Are they only using flamethrowers and Pinocchios now?
The question is: is it time to use our trump card or not? Is it time, or what are the options? Or, as someone told me, we need to outperform them. Ha-ha. Here's the latest news //EU countries have authorized their warships in the Mediterranean as part of Operation IRINI to detain foreign tankers suspected of carrying Russian oil//

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Vent

Is it time or what are the options?

In terms of "war to the bitter end," there are no other options.

[Wind]

What's the alternative? Agreeing somewhere in the middle and pretending nothing ever happened. That could make things even worse, in my opinion.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Vent

What is the alternative option?

Freezing and smoldering confrontation.

Quote: Vent

So in my opinion, things could get even worse later.

For you personally, perhaps not. For Putin, it's dangerous. The number of dissatisfied people is growing every year. Those who've been going nuts for four years without a break need rehabilitation. They'll want to hold the SVO accountable. And who else can hold them accountable if not themselves? So he might give the order to "go for it," because it's at least a chance. But, I repeat, nuclear weapons aren't a magic wand, they're just a tool that requires hands and a brain. I don't see any of that there.

[Wind]

Quote: Puncher

For you personally, perhaps not. For Putin, it's dangerous.

No, it's not a question of leadership. We saw what a smoldering conflict means in Karabakh. During this time, Ukraine won't be accepted into NATO; that's not why the West started the conflict. They'll pump it full of weapons (aircraft, missiles, and so on). They're integrated into the NATO system (intelligence, training, communications systems, and so on), but NATO has nothing to do with it. They'll wait for the right moment to strike. No one's even hiding it there. In other words, we're getting a much worse deal than we have now.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Vent

We saw in Karabakh what a smoldering conflict means.

Yes. Nothing good. There were expectations that China would provide assistance, but Comrade Xi is openly abandoning us.

[Wind]

No, it is not in his interests to sell us out.

[Wind]

Quote: Puncher

But I repeat, nuclear weapons aren't a magic wand, they're just a tool that requires hands and a brain. I don't see any of that there.

Yes, it's not a sword-kladenets. But the enemy doesn't have such weapons, and they can't replace them with 50-kilogram AI drones.

[Wind]

Quote: Puncher

More precisely, it is impossible to create their concentration, since this will immediately trigger drone strikes.

Drones are dangerous when they're concentrated and the front is static, with workshops prepared, reconnaissance conducted, repeaters deployed, and so on. If the front starts moving, everyone will forget about these drones. It's like heavy artillery in World War I. When the front is stationary, it's king, but when it's moving, it's a liability. The same goes for drones.

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Vent

If the front starts moving

In order for the front to move, a breakthrough is needed.
This requires a concentration of forces. Two heroes on a motorcycle aren't a breakthrough. Masses of troops and, most importantly, equipment are needed. Not "loaves" with body kits, but armored vehicles. And more. Let me remind you (in case you knew, of course) that in the USSR, TNW strikes were carried out not at the front line, but in depth (in the plans). This was due to the need to avoid damaging one's own forces and assets, and also to, after a breakthrough, enter territory where the decay of short-lived (but deadly) radioactive elements had already occurred. In other words, the first line had to be broken through. Clearly, the first line with a disrupted supply line is vulnerable, but to achieve this, a strike force must be formed.

[Sarboz]

Quote: Puncher

Quote: Evgeny64

you can call it "Nut"

Its accuracy is plus or minus a hundred meters. Hitting the Oreshnik on a railway embankment is certainly possible with a few tries, but the consequences of such a hit will be cleared up in less than a day.

Where did the firewood come from? The Oreshnik ballistic missile with multiple warheads is a precision weapon. That is, its accuracy is within a few meters. This is confirmed by the strike on the Yuzhmash workshops and the destruction of the "garage cooperative" in Bila Tserkva, photographs of whose destruction the Kyiv regime, for some reason, is not releasing.

[Kisulken]

Russia doesn't have enough money to pump out hazelnuts once a week. We can't produce them at that rate.

[Panadol]

To destroy anything, you need willpower. And balls of steel! Everything else will work out. But if a lieutenant colonel or higher refuses to give a direct order, is afraid to sign off on it, any SVO will drag on forever. Or a mutiny.

[Vauxhall]

Quote: Elektronik2000

So, they've finally found a scapegoat – Palantir. Why have military operations been going on for over four years now, while the enemy's logistics, like the bridges across the Dnieper and the Beskydy Tunnel, weren't destroyed back in the early days of the Central Military District? If we continue this truism for another couple of years, not only Palantir but also Tomahawks and then nuclear weapons will appear in Ukraine. The longer and more hopeless this military campaign, the more troubles and problems each month will bring us. So, either a decisive strike, or, if the sentimentality prevents that, peace talks. But with one imperative condition: immediately after the peace is concluded, the entire Russian leadership not only resigns, but also becomes subject to criminal prosecution for criminal negligence.

There are only 4 targets that destroy transport logistics.
Chop (on the border with Slovakia and Hungary), Mostiska (on the Polish border) and Vadul-Siret, Yagodin.
Not a single strike on these objects.
And this could drastically reduce rail deliveries.

[Bayun]

Our ЫЫ gives out "a terrible secret""The Khazars are successfully taking revenge on the Slavs, forcing the two largest Slavic armies to fight. The plan of the New Khazaria is simple: the maximum destruction of the armies and civilian populations of Kievan and Muscovite Rus."

P.S.: In the second stage of the plan (around 2030), the Western Slavs will be thrown into the "meat grinder"...

[Evgeny64]

Oh, come on, what about the smell of Anchorage?
"We are not like that," however, we warned the embassies and... we gave it all up, and as it turned out, they were right.
We are waiting for the moment to come.

[TermNachTer]

No one would ever put something that actually works out in public view. On the contrary, they'd hide it away so no one would even suspect it. If the media is talking about it, it's probably just another version of the Flamindich missile.

[Alexander]

What's the point of liquidating the embassy? It stinks and does no good!

[Sarboz]

Quote: Aleksandral

What's the point of liquidating the embassy? It stinks and does no good!

Well, you wouldn't say that. It's through the embassy that the work of collecting and transmitting intelligence and the overall leadership of this fascist clique is organized.

[Zoldat_A]

Ukraine is striking deep into Russia thanks to Palantir's PRISMA software.

You can not read further.
From the comments, there is only one thing that comes to mind -
[N E C E N Z U R N O]
Everything I've learned in almost 40 years on the construction site...

[Ruslan M]

But we do have a red marker. Wait, it's an American company. Well, then let's just pretend nothing's happening. Because it's scary to go up against the Star-Spangled Banner even with just a marker, or they'll do something nasty.

[paul3390]

But if they supplied Iran and the Houthis with, say, modern anti-ship missiles and air defense systems, you see, even that palantir of theirs would behave much more carefully... Under threat of transmitting something else evil in the future if they don't stop.

[Vauxhall]

Quote: paul3390

But if they supplied Iran and the Houthis with, say, modern anti-ship missiles and air defense systems, you see, even that palantir of theirs would behave much more carefully... Under threat of transmitting something else evil in the future if they don't stop.

Who will put this?
Kremlin Faberge abroad.

[Siberia55]

But we have a red marker.

No, we have Medvedev! He's already taken everyone down.

[Kot28.Ru.]

If the drone is "proper," meaning Israeli, or at least Ukrainian, they'll say, "Well, it happens." If it's Russian, well, you know what I mean. And then it's not a UAV that's needed, but something more substantial, heavier, and something that was built yesterday.

[Same lech]

Ukraine is striking deep into Russia thanks to Palantir's PRISMA software.

The issue is not Palantirе at all...but the impunity of the Americans.
Russia is hit exactly as much as it allows the enemy to be hit...that's all.

[paul3390]

And if you drag out the war for another 10 years, you'll see what happens. After all, today's Russia isn't even close to the mighty Soviet Union—fighting the entire West alone for years is certainly stressful. Especially when the war is fought on two fronts—with the enemy and with your own supposed economic bloc.

[born007]

And if you add that all imported cameras in Russia come pre-installed with Palantir software, then you can't be sure about security at all.

[Radius]

Why weren't there any attacks on Palantir BEFORE their attacks? Are you weak in the gut?

[Ivan Vasilievich 282]

Why weren't there any attacks on Palantir?

What are you planning on hitting? Telephone poles? It's just software running on American servers, you can use it even from an old tablet.

[alexoff]

Head - Alex Karp.

He recently performed in Ukraine. Unfortunately, Naryshkin's department, as usual, couldn't find out where he was, so he quietly left.

[Boris Sergeev]

Naryshkin's department is busy issuing press releases - they don't have time for details!

[Murzik]

Naryshkin's department and he himself met with Budanov, and you're all talking about Karp here.

[Wratch]

With the horrific crime rate in Miami, surely there's a drunken black drug addict with a knife who won't stab Lesha Karp to death? Aren't there plenty of criminals out there?

[alexoff]

I looked at crime statistics – in the US, only every second murder and every tenth carjacking are solved; no AI is helping. They should just hire people in Los Angeles; there are a lot of homeless people there. Give them drones and let them catch them, since ours can't catch them in Ukraine.

[Gavrilo Princip]

Bring a couple of bags from the Argentine embassy and it won't just be Karp who suffers, but also the Scotts, Petes, and all the Trumps.

[acetophenone]

In this regard, a pressing question arises: could a private kamikaze drone, which has no connection to any government agency, accidentally fall on the head office of this private company or its laboratory?

Of course it can. If it's launched by men with balls, not red markers.

[Serik Bur]

Ukraine is striking deep into Russia thanks to PRISMA software.

My tongue is itching to say it - Ukraine is beating Russia in the hinterland, thanks to PRISMA software.Well, I can’t understand what’s going on, and how can I explain it to the guys on lbs?

[pexotinec]

Well, Zelya said there's going to be war in the next five years, so that means there will be. Apparently, it benefits a select few, not you and me.

[123_123]

If American companies benefit from doing business with Ukrainians, they will certainly do so. Capitalism is about added value and the interests of beneficiaries, not about agreements and likes and dislikes. All agreements merely serve the economy and are observed when they don't conflict with the interests of capital. If Russia wants Americans on its side, it should be profitable for them to terrorize the Ukrainians. This is the only best option among the worst, unless Russia is prepared to act decisively.

[Vyacheslav Boldyrev]

The problem of our country, Russia, is its invented hyper-humanism.
And a nuclear great power has everything it needs to solve all its problems!

[Elektronik2000]

The problem with our country is that they use tales of hyper-humanism to explain to the people their fear of striking the enemy harder, so they confiscate all the assets in the West of those who can and should order such a strike.

[Gavrilo Princip]

The richest country in terms of mineral resources, the largest number of nuclear weapons, the most patient people in the world. And here's this scum of the earth from the Abramovichs, Mikhelsons, and other riff-raff from Yeltsin's "Family"...

[Sergey Novikov_3]

On May 28 alone, drone attacks on the Alchevsk-Luhansk highway killed seven people, including two children, and injured 15 more. In Horlivka, a drone strike on a civilian vehicle killed an entire family: a brother and sister, aged 13 and 14, and their parents. Ukrainians even targeted a regular bus from Makiivka to Sevastopol. The passengers miraculously escaped unharmed, managing to take cover. However, one of the bus drivers later died of a stroke, unable to cope with the stress.

In just one day... So, in the end, they're back where they started. They're attacking Luhansk. Alchevsk is practically a suburb of Luhansk.

[AdAstra]

So, it seems like the LPR was liberated or not?

[tralflot1832]

Peter Thiel is "openly gay" and they say they're not malicious. No wonder they were banned here. And Alex Karp seems to be part of that gang.

[solar]

And Alex Karp seems to be from this gang.

Definitely not. He has not just one woman, but two.

As of 2025, Karp is in long-term relationships with two women. He was described as "geographically monogamous".[88]
As of 2025, Karp is in long-term relationships with two women and has been described as "geographically monogamous."[88]

He and Peter Thiel attended Stanford Law School together.

Peter Thiel is openly gay.

Not very open. He was angry at the tabloid website Gawker for uncovering this, and ruined it with lawsuits, funding others who suffered at the site's expense for publishing personal details about celebrities. Thiel financed wrestler Hulk Hogan's lawsuit, which brought the site down.

[esso]

In this regard, a pressing question arises: could a private kamikaze drone, which has no connection to any government agency, accidentally fall on the head office of this private company or its laboratory?
Of course it can, and the head of the company can die....

[Vladimirius]

Unfortunately, we are not like that, and we fight exclusively according to the rules, only in their war, as in war

[bulbash70]

Ukraine, and not only it, has been beating Russia since 2000, thanks to software installed by the Americans in the Kremlin! It's called GDP.

[Rakitin]

In such cases, Comrade Stalin would send a gift ice axe by courier to Mr. Karp's fellow tribesman in Mexico, not so far from Florida. And the matter was finally resolved.

[solar]

The situation is different. This fellow tribesman's friends were penniless and couldn't threaten Comrade Stalin. Mr. Karp's friends, however, are billionaires like himself and might take offense and return the ice axe.

[Rakitin]

This is debatable – Comrade Leiba's cousin was among the top 50 leading bankers in the United States. But that didn't stop Comrade Stalin from sending a gift to Comrade Leiba's comrade-in-arms in Mexico.

[solar]

This is debatable - Comrade Leiba's cousin was among the top 50 leading bankers in the United States.

So, comrade Leiba sold his papers to escape poverty?

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Rakitin

In such cases, Comrade Stalin would send a gift ice pick... And the issue was finally resolved.

And did Comrade Stalin send out many ice axes, other than that one well-known instance? And what issue was resolved in that very instance?

[Gavrilo Princip]

Well, write this down. And please distribute it among your agitators so they don't ask stupid questions anymore.
Stepan Bandera: Ukrainian nationalist leader. Assassinated by KGB agent Bohdan Stashynsky on October 15, 1959, in Munich, West Germany.
Yevhen Konovalets: leader of the OUN. Killed by NKVD agent Pavel Sudoplatov on May 23, 1938, in Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Georgy Oppenheim (Georgy Agabekov): former OGPU resident in Istanbul, who fled to the West in 1930. Killed on the Spanish-French border.
Ignatius Reiss (Nathan Poretsky): a high-ranking NKVD agent. Assassinated by a group of Soviet agents near Lausanne, Switzerland.
Georgy Okudzhava was liquidated after fleeing abroad and being accused of anti-Soviet activities.
You'll find out what's next yourself.
The difference is obvious, right?

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Gavrilo Princip

The difference is obvious, right?

Now follow the thought to understand the difference.
1. A certain American citizen is helping Ukraine.
2. The idea was expressed that Comrade Stalin would have killed such a citizen.
3. I asked for examples.
4. You give me examples of killed defectors, traitors and retired Ukrainian nationalists.

Now, a couple of asterisked questions for the especially gifted: do you understand the difference between an American businessman and a former OGPU agent who, at the time of his assassination, was considered a used condom? And how many businessmen or industrialists who helped Germany fight the USSR were killed on Stalin's orders?
And to repeat the question already asked: what problems were resolved after Trotsky's assassination? And all the ones you listed, so I don't have to get up twice.
Go Google so you don't write stupid, off-topic comments.

[Gavrilo Princip]

So, have you found the rest of those whom the USSR's security services liquidated abroad, or is this just another question for lack of an answer? And read the book below at your leisure.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Gavrilo Princip

So I found the rest of those whom the USSR security agencies liquidated abroad.

Let anyone who claimed that under Stalin our secret services killed people like the American businessman and industrialist mentioned in the news find evidence to prove it. Why should I do that? Again, I don't see the answer to the question: what problem was solved by the murder of Trotsky (Konovalets, Oppenheim, Reiss)? Sorry, but it wasn't Stalin who killed Bandera.
And don't tell me that the Soviet secret services were engaged in the elimination of traitors—I know that without you. However, right now we're talking about something a little different.

[Rakitin]

If you dig a little deeper, all the current suspects are one or two generations of former Russian/Soviet Jews. And, as we know, it's not the passport (even an American one) that gets you hit, but the face, especially if it's engaged in activities clearly destructive to Russia.

[sdivt]

The burning question is: could a private kamikaze drone, unrelated to any government agency, accidentally crash onto...

maybe... maybe not...
As they say, you won't know until you try.

[faterdom]

That is, we have the right to hit Alex Karp, while saying that we are in no way at war with the United States, and even dream of reconciling them with Iran.

[vitaliy20091959]

And what about a private company? Does it have any connection to the country? Then why are sanctions imposed on Russian private companies?

[cmax]

Quote: vitaliy20091959

And what about a private company? Does it have any connection to the country? Then why are sanctions imposed on Russian private companies?

Because they are who they are, and we are... not like that!

[Hole puncher]

Peter Thiel is unofficially known as the "Don of the PayPal Mafia." He's unknown in Russia, but he's well-known in the US, as members of this so-called "mafia" founded YouTube, SpaceX, Palantir, and a number of other significant companies. And Elon Musk (one of them) is behind the creation of OpenAI, which spun off Antropic... These are truly extraordinary individuals who have set the direction for many global trends and exerted enormous influence worldwide. Peter Thiel's manifesto is very interesting, and there was an article on VO that partially analyzed it, but it didn't particularly spark interest among VO readers. And that's a shame. I believe this group's influence in the US (and the world) will only grow. Things didn't work out so well with Trump, but "everything starts well."

[solar]

Peter Thiel is unofficially known as the "Don of the PayPal Mafia." He's unknown here, but well-known in the US...

One of the members of this "mafia" is Max Levchin (he is jokingly called "the chief adviser to the mafia don"), who, like Thiel, is also a billionaire and grew up in Kyiv.

[Hole puncher]

Quote from solar

One of the members of this "mafia" is Max Levchin (he is jokingly called "the chief adviser to the mafia don"), who, like Thiel, is also a billionaire and grew up in Kyiv.

The most important thing is that they are very rich, very influential, and relatively young. Yes, in politics, 50 years old is young.

[gridasov]

The criterion for highly effective big data analysis will be the development of an optimized energy process for human needs. This will be a device that will determine the future of civilization, with the foundations for an even more incredibly large array of modernization and application in the rapidly changing conditions of a changing world. But modern AI and, most importantly, big data methods based on modern mathematical foundations cannot achieve this.

[vol46an]

This American private executive was recently in Kyiv. He should have been destroyed with a private missile or drone.
The West is imposing rules of war on us, and we're trudging along under these rules. We can't strike at specific targets; we need to strike at large areas.

[Starover_Z]

Could it be that a private kamikaze drone, having no connection to any government agency, accidentally crashes onto the head office of this private company or its laboratory?

It can’t, but MUST FALL, and not alone, and not only on the office!!!

[Hole puncher]

Quote: Starover_Z

It can’t, but MUST FALL, and not alone, and not only on the office!!!

Palantir is headquartered in Pal Alto, California.

[tralflot1832]

Quote from solar

And Alex Karp seems to be from this gang.

Definitely not. He has not just one woman, but two.

As of 2025, Karp is in long-term relationships with two women. He was described as "geographically monogamous".[88]
As of 2025, Karp is in long-term relationships with two women and has been described as "geographically monogamous."[88]

He and Peter Thiel attended Stanford Law School together.

Peter Thiel is openly gay.

Not very open. He was angry at the tabloid website Gawker for uncovering this, and ruined it with lawsuits, funding others who suffered at the site's expense for publishing personal details about celebrities. Thiel financed wrestler Hulk Hogan's lawsuit, which brought the site down.

For some reason, Thiel did not touch Wikipedia.

[Zaurbek]

I have another question: Why don’t we prosecute employees of companies like Palantir, Starlink, etc.?

[gridasov]

Because they are like a reference point that you can use to see their shortcomings or achievements - and be better.

[Zaurbek]

This is the enemy's infrastructure...it must be destroyed.

[Arifon]

"...could a private kamikaze drone, unrelated to any government agency, accidentally fall on the head office of this private company or its laboratory?"
Do not prompt !!!

[gridasov]

It's necessary to build a team of developers from scratch, using the same core principles as Palantir, but with fundamental mathematical principles and hardware supporting a fundamentally different operating principle. There's simply no alternative to this evolutionary path. That is, of course, if this evolution continues.

[Zaurbek]

There is nothing super innovative here.
For some reason, systems like 1C or Bitrix plague corporate employees. But we don't see them in the military. These are advanced CRM systems powered by AI.
Whatever you write down, they will analyze.

They need to analyze warehouse logistics and the work of managers, and help with intelligence analysis.

[gridasov]

In analysis, there are no concepts of good or bad, and there's no need to prove or disprove. Analysis involves working with the entire data set, and this method instantly develops the human brain to the potential of a highly effective robot. Because the brain, with such motivation and understanding of the method for distributing super-big data, will never be satisfied with this information. And most importantly, the brain very quickly notices patterns and similarities in processes.

[patxi46]

When will we finally cut the cables like they did?

[reframing]

Until we respond, nothing will change.
Starlink and Palantir will be against us, they will seize tankers and sink gas carriers, fly through the Baltics and from Kazakhstan.
Many can be easily put in their place.
There is no political will from the Kremlin

[Zaurbek]

You've seen the face of the Defense Ministry official responsible for innovation in the Army. He was placed under investigation last year. Take a look.