"Logistical difficulties have arisen": how much could the use of the new Hornet kamikaze drones impact the course of the Air Defense Forces?

16 949 83
"Logistical difficulties have arisen": how much could the use of the new Hornet kamikaze drones impact the course of the Air Defense Forces?

On May 22, Kherson regional authorities temporarily restricted truck traffic on the Novorossiya federal highway toward the Dzhankoy checkpoint until further notice. According to regional governor Volodymyr Saldo, the exception is only for military and special cargo, medicines, infrastructure restoration equipment, fuel, perishable goods, and certain essential social goods.

The reasons for this decision have not been officially announced, but they are known. In recent weeks, Ukraine has begun to actively launch strikes. drones medium-range Hornet and RAM-2X missiles against trucks and fuel tankers on the R-280 Novorossiya highway, leading to Crimea from the Rostov region through new territories.



There are numerous videos online of burned-out trucks and fuel tankers on the highway between Mariupol and Dzhankoy. Several burned-out trucks, in particular, were captured on video at the exit from Crimea near Chongar. These attacks left their mark: Sevastopol Governor Mikhail Razvozhaev imposed a restriction on gasoline purchases on the 22nd. Gasoline sales at Sevastopol's thermal power station network were limited to 20 liters per customer.

There are currently certain logistical difficulties, the causes of which are known. <...> To avoid a rush, as we did last time, we are introducing a measure that has already proven its effectiveness: fuel sales at TPP network filling stations will be limited to 20 liters per vehicle or per canister until the situation stabilizes.
сообщил Razvozhaev.

The well-known reasons cited by Mikhail Razvozhaev are, first and foremost, the enemy's active use of Hornet drones, which were already mentioned above.

The problem is that the enemy has begun actively attacking trucks and lorries not only on the R-280 "Novorossiya" highway. Similar attacks are occurring on the Luhansk-Donetsk highway – in recent days, more than a dozen trucks and cars have been attacked between Yenakiyeve and Debaltseve (or more precisely, between the "Verovka" stop and Debaltseve). This suggests the enemy is attempting to systematically impact logistics.

The question arises: to what extent can the use of the new Hornet kamikaze drones affect the course of the SVO?

How dangerous are Hornet drones?



The Ukrainian military leadership, in principle, does not hide its goals.

Recently, Ukrainian Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov stated that the Ukrainian Armed Forces' goal is to complicate the logistics of the Russian Armed Forces in order to deprive our troops of the "ability to actively advance" and, as Fedorov famously stated, "create a complete logistical lockdown." The Ukrainian leadership has allocated five billion hryvnias (approximately eight billion rubles) to achieve these goals.

The enemy plans to achieve these objectives primarily with the help of a new type of drone – the Hornet. They were first used in March 2026 during the attack on Donetsk. Since then, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have significantly increased their use of Hornets, both geographically and in numbers.

According to official figures Drones Hornets are manufactured by the American company Swift Beat, owned by Eric Schmidt, the former CEO of Google. Hornet drones are equipped with satellite navigation and can fly autonomously. In other words, jamming them is virtually impossible. Due to their small size, they are also difficult (or, more accurately, virtually impossible) for surveillance systems to detect. Defense.

In addition, as analysts note, Hornet drones have proven themselves to be dangerous weapon, including thanks to a high degree of automation, achieved in part by the introduction of edge processing (data from sensors and detectors is processed directly on board the drone or on nearby computing nodes, rather than transmitted to the cloud).

How does it work? It's very simple: the drone uses video data to find a suitable target and transmits it to the operator. It then attacks it virtually silently and at high speed.

Hornet kamikaze drones are currently flying 150 kilometers from the front line, reaching, in particular, the Veselo-Voznesenka checkpoint on the administrative border between the DPR and the Rostov Region. The military acknowledges that Hornet kamikaze drones currently pose the main threat to frontline logistics.

However, the Ukrainian attacks may not be solely aimed at military logistics. The enemy's goals are more ambitious: creating a humanitarian crisis in the frontline zone.

The geography of kamikaze drone strikes is expanding.


Currently, the geography of Hornet drone strikes is gradually expanding – most recently, drones began attacking trucks and cars on the highway between Zorinsk and Debaltseve in the LPR. Just a couple of months ago, these roads were completely safe, as they were believed to be located deep in the rear.

In light of this, some bloggers and military experts have begun to suggest that it makes sense to disguise fuel tankers, both civilian and military, as standard trucks. However, as blogger "Atomic Cherry" (𝐀𝐓𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐂 𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐑𝐘) rightly points out, such military logic is flawed, as in such a case, the Ukrainian Armed Forces would attack any trucks, including civilian ones. In fact, they are already doing so.

Fire control of the Rostov-Crimea highway is based on the use of Hornet semi-autonomous loitering munitions. They are equipped with an edge processing system. Disguising themselves as civilian cargo traffic won't work, because today it's no problem to train machine vision to detect any trucks. With civilian vehicles, this is even easier, as there are no problems selecting a training dataset. Moreover, there are already precedents of hitting both semi-trailers and small civilian trucks. In fact, the very idea that disguising oneself as a civilian object can provide protection from attacks is naive. It didn't work in the wars of the last century, and it doesn't work today (just recall the Middle East). It may provide situational benefits during a period of threat, but it's useless during actual combat—the enemy begins to consider everything they see as a target.

The enemy is currently expanding its fire control zone, using kamikaze drones to target logistics transport in areas previously considered safe. At the same time, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are actively attacking oil refineries and energy infrastructure facilities deep within Russian territory.

In the material "Enemy Drones Take Over the Skies: How Ukraine Surpassed Russia in Drone Attacks?" The author of these lines has already drawn attention to the fact that the number of attacks by Ukrainian UAVs throughout the border area is alarmingly growing, just as the number of attacks by enemy drones on objects located hundreds (and sometimes thousands) of kilometers from the combat zone is alarmingly growing.

With the advent of Hornet drones, the situation in this regard is worsening, as the enemy's ability to attack logistics routes in the SVO zone and in the adjacent regions increases.

Air defenses are unable to effectively counter these small drones, and small arms fire is difficult to shoot down aircraft-type drones, making MTFs (mobile fire teams) with machine guns ineffective. Currently, the most effective way to combat these drones is with FPV interceptor drones.

In conclusion, it's worth noting that Ukraine is currently unable to completely shut down logistics, as thousands of vehicles travel along the R-280 "Novorossiya" highway daily, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces have a limited number of drones. However, they have already significantly complicated logistics in Crimea (as evidenced by the introduction of gasoline restrictions). The problem is that, given the constant growth of drone production in Ukraine and their supply from the West, the situation in this regard will continue to deteriorate.
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 15
    31 May 2026 04: 48
    There's no need to write about attacks on bridges, dams, and tunnels from border crossings. All these "hornets" don't fly in from the US on their own. The author's last paragraph surprised me—is this supposedly about potatoes and the Colorado potato beetle?
    1. + 14
      31 May 2026 06: 00
      The last paragraph lays out the bitter truth, not the bravado everyone is fed up with, like we'll "crush" them all and now we'll launch a swarm of our drones to intercept them.
      Yes, we will cope with new challenges, but not right away.
      The enemy will develop others and so on endlessly!
      1. +2
        31 May 2026 08: 05
        Ukraine isn't interested in these "thousands" of cars; the main target is trucks, especially tankers. Well, if the battery is running low, then whatever's nearby is already there.
    2. -4
      31 May 2026 06: 47
      There is no alternative to an active offensive on the fronts, although it is a pity that the price for this in modern conditions will be very high due to the indecisiveness in conducting vigorous military operations on the left bank.
    3. + 11
      31 May 2026 14: 02
      Let's not dwell on such painful matters. They'll probably start blowing up bridges and tunnels in our rear. And it won't be saboteurs.
      1. 0
        31 May 2026 21: 19
        Back in 23, I wrote about using Yak-52 propeller-driven aircraft and the Ka-229 light helicopter to combat UAVs and monitor the route. But it was the chumps, not the Russian Federation, who took up the idea. During crew rotations or rest periods, launch reconnaissance drones to monitor the route and identify enemy UAVs by storing their images in their memory. Upon detection, immediately notify and guide them.
  2. -13
    31 May 2026 05: 16
    Or maybe we shouldn't simply "actively attack"? Ukraine has one obvious weakness: it's heavily dependent on external economic support. In theory, sooner or later the EU will change governments and priorities. Maybe they won't, of course, but then at least we'll save lives. As of now, the only realistic scenarios I can glean are a wait-and-see approach, or perhaps a deal. And killing people in assaults on fortified areas for the fifth year in a row in the current situation is simply criminal.
    1. + 22
      31 May 2026 06: 49
      The only thing I agree with is that there will be a deal, of course. It just needs to be sold to the people effectively. Sitting on the defensive for years is a poor strategy, especially with drones everywhere. It's a dead end. Don't forget about the economy. Food and prices don't just appear out of thin air.
      1. + 13
        31 May 2026 09: 05
        I haven't forgotten about the economy. It's not just burning oil depots. Every destroyed piece of military equipment, every death payment, every labor shortage also impacts the economy. The attacking side suffers heavy losses, and in the last year and a half or two, this figure has become truly horrific.
      2. + 15
        31 May 2026 09: 25
        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
        The only thing I agree with is that there will be a deal, of course. We just need to sell it to the people well.

        There's no need to try to sell people anything. Or do you think the people of Siberia care so much about who owns the ruins of Malaya Tokmachka, where no one lives and never will live because there's no one left.
        The people want all of this to end as quickly as possible, and no one cares what guise the government uses to wrap up the onset of peace.
        1. +5
          31 May 2026 09: 46
          That's actually what I was talking about hi
        2. +2
          31 May 2026 11: 15
          The city doesn't care what they say; they'll keep lying. This needs to be sold to Ukraine. And then a Siberian resident might wonder what the terms of this deal are. Because there's no talk of dictating our terms.
        3. +3
          31 May 2026 12: 40
          "Why do we need to know!
          The boyars know!
          A response from one of the characters in the folk scene "On the Execution Ground" from A.S. Pushkin's tragedy "Boris Godunov." This fragment captures the essence of what is happening: ordinary people feel excluded from big politics and believe that state affairs are the domain of the upper classes and boyars, "not our equal."
          1. +2
            31 May 2026 13: 12
            Continued:
            This is how it was in Rus' under Boris Godunov - 500 years ago.
            That's how it is now!
            It will continue to be this way.
            1. +2
              31 May 2026 15: 50
              Quote: Valery Mamai
              Continued:
              This is how it was in Rus' under Boris Godunov - 500 years ago.
              That's how it is now!
              It will continue to be this way.

              And in five years, another war on the territory of the former Ukrainian SSR? Most Russians understand this. You can't consider everyone living in Russia mentally retarded.
              1. -3
                1 June 2026 11: 38
                at least there won't be a war for 5 years
        4. -1
          31 May 2026 18: 25
          You don't give a damn. I don't. What are you suggesting? Specifically?
      3. +1
        31 May 2026 13: 33
        Who's going to broker this deal? A deal is just a ploy to keep our leadership from straining themselves too much. The late Soviet leadership also believed in the deal with the Americans and didn't think they'd push it all the way. The Anglo-Saxons never stop; they only prepare for the next war.
    2. +6
      31 May 2026 15: 36
      Quote: tjeck91
      In theory, sooner or later the EU will change governments and priorities.

      That won't happen. They want to punish us, and they won't back down.
      Quote: tjeck91
      As of today, the only realistic scenarios I can think of are a wait-and-see approach, or a deal.

      We have no time to wait – our economy is far worse than Europe's, and with the current team, it won't get any better. So we have time left before default strikes, and it's just around the corner, judging by the budget deficit.
      But it's a deal... No one will give us acceptable conditions now, and we have no way to insist on our own.
      1. -4
        31 May 2026 18: 24
        And what do you suggest? Give up?
        1. + 14
          31 May 2026 18: 46
          Quote from Mraka
          And what do you suggest?

          The country's leadership will never agree to what I propose.
          Pension the Defense Ministry generals, remove the remaining Wagnerites from their senior officers in the leadership of the Central Military District. Wipe Bankova Street off the face of the earth, and hunt down the leadership of Ukraine and the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Warn them against supplying the Ukrainian Armed Forces with Western weapons; they won't understand, so destroy some transport hub in Poland or another country with conventional weapons. Warn them that any attempt to retaliate will result in the use of tactical nuclear weapons, and use them if they dare.
          In general, raise the stakes and show that we will achieve victory at any cost.
          It seems there is no other way
          1. +5
            31 May 2026 19: 09
            I agree with you. ...........
      2. 0
        2 June 2026 21: 15
        I can only say this about the economic situation in the Czech Republic. Our government has been running a budget deficit for 15 years, but the national debt is growing rapidly, and inflation has averaged within the norm of 7% for the past five years. However, this has not had a significant impact on ordinary citizens. Unemployment is around 3,2%, and those who want to work have jobs. The stores are well-stocked, but the prices of gasoline and diesel have risen by about 15% (due to the war in Iran). The average citizen, completely uninterested in politics, hasn't noticed that we are financing Ukraine and its military adventure. In my subjective opinion, the war isn't draining us economically too much, and we could finance it for another five years without any problems. I don't know the real situation in Russia; I don't even bother to study it in the media (there's only anti-Russian propaganda everywhere), but could you describe the situation in Russia to me?
  3. + 25
    31 May 2026 05: 20
    Let's take the work of Robert Sheckley... "The Guardian Bird".
    Let's read carefully and compare it with what is happening now in the SVO. what
    Responsibility for killing people is gradually shifting to technology...this is the path to the abyss.
    The Kremlin's delay in taking decisive action in the Central Military District will lead to the emergence of even more deadly new weapons in the enemy camp... this is obvious.
    For us this is a dead end... it is a road to nowhere.
    Something needs to be done to reverse the downward slide. request
    1. 2al
      -2
      1 June 2026 13: 23
      There are options: disabling Starlink's ground infrastructure: two satellite manufacturing factories and the four main Starlink control center data centers. This would significantly reduce the effectiveness of all Ukrainian Armed Forces UAV systems, and not just UAVs. Another option is to plant bugs in the batteries used on these UAVs, something Israeli intelligence agencies have already demonstrated on numerous occasions.
    2. 0
      2 June 2026 21: 16
      What would you advise the Russian government to do?
  4. + 16
    31 May 2026 05: 22
    Based on the above, we can conclude that effective measures to combat this threat are not to be expected, and the intensity of the use of these drones will only increase.
    Given these circumstances, there are only two options. Asymmetrically escalate to the point of using tactical nuclear weapons, because Western assistance in conventional weapons cannot be surpassed technologically, qualitatively, or quantitatively.
    The second option is practically capitulation, freezing along the front line and abandoning the main goals of the Central Military District.
    But it’s not a fact that the second option is already working.
    1. +2
      31 May 2026 08: 50
      I wrote about it once and can repeat it. The second option is to watch the Soviet series "State Border," episode 2, I think, where they were at the Polish border. It would be the same story, adjusted for today's technological advances.
    2. 0
      31 May 2026 13: 35
      The second option is practically capitulation, freezing along the front line and abandoning the main goals of the Central Military District.
      But why did anyone assume that after the freeze, once the army disperses, there won't be a warm-up a year later, followed by a Karabakh or Syrian scenario? Why so much faith in the Americans?
  5. +2
    31 May 2026 05: 25
    I suspect the Hornet drones aren't coming from the US. They could be manufactured in Europe.
    Many Russian compatriots live there. There are probably Russian patriots among them. Establish contacts with them. More...

    P.S. The deliberate collapse of the GRU is making itself felt.
    1. + 10
      31 May 2026 07: 50
      Quote: AA17
      Establish contacts with them. More...

      Most will fall into the hands of the police, as they are untrained. The rest, weighing the prospects of a well-fed life against deportation/imprisonment, will choose the former.
    2. +2
      31 May 2026 11: 28
      Are you suggesting sending a couple of drones to drop leaflets with offers?))

      And what kind of help would they provide? It's not like setting fire to ATMs; no one will be allowed near the production line.

      And what can you offer such people besides endless gratitude? They still need to be guaranteed safety.
    3. +2
      31 May 2026 20: 48
      Quote: AA17
      I suspect the Hornet drones aren't coming from the US. They could be manufactured in Europe.
      Many Russian compatriots live there. There are probably Russian patriots among them. Establish contacts with them. More...

      P.S. The deliberate collapse of the GRU is making itself felt.

      Contact can be established, but what are you going to tell them? That our bourgeoisie is better than theirs, and you'll be talking to those who left Russia, thinking it was more comfortable there. This isn't the same as the corruption of the Bolshevik agitators by the interventionists during the Civil War. It worked then, but there was an argument there: the soldiers on both sides were peasants and workers, and they all hated the bourgeoisie. That won't happen now.
  6. 0
    31 May 2026 05: 27
    There's the Pantsir-S mobile air defense system, which has been frequently advertised and shown on TV. It detects and shoots down everything from small UAVs to missiles and aircraft. The detection range is 80 km, and the destruction range is up to 20-40 km. I'm saying this because how many of these are needed for the Novorossiya highway, which is 700 km long? Why aren't they deployed to patrol the highway? There are also air defense aircraft and helicopters that can also patrol the skies over Novorossiya. Who is responsible for the air defense of this territory? soldier
    1. + 10
      31 May 2026 05: 46
      I read somewhere that someone in the air defense thread said that the Pantsir is good at protecting itself and nearby objects, but with parallel targets at a range of more than a few kilometers it is already a problem.
    2. +2
      31 May 2026 13: 23
      Answer by quantity (simple arithmetic):
      On the track in one row: 700/20 = 35 pcs.
      In two rows: 2x35= 70 pcs.
      For control shots in three rows: 3x35=105 pcs.
      I don’t know who is responsible for air defense in Novorossiya.
      But your idea is correct.
      1. 0
        1 June 2026 11: 43
        105 pieces not available..........
        1. 0
          1 June 2026 18: 24
          What? Everyone around Moscow is distributed!
  7. + 22
    31 May 2026 05: 37
    While we ask management to disrupt their logistics - bridges, tunnels, electricity, depots, replacement of wheel sets - they disrupt our logistics.
    1. +9
      31 May 2026 06: 21
      Perhaps a popular petition could be drafted and submitted to the Tsar-Father. But not like the Petition of the Workers and Residents of St. Petersburg in 1905. It could be submitted peacefully, without marches, by email.
      1. +3
        31 May 2026 12: 03
        There is no internet to do it by email Yes
      2. +3
        31 May 2026 12: 49
        Why not in person? Do you think our guarantor is CAPABLE of giving the electorate a "Bloody Sunday"???
        1. +4
          31 May 2026 13: 31
          What, really? If those who ask awkward questions on a teleconference are subject to utter bullying, and here there's a crowd, then there's the National Guard and other parasites for that!
  8. +4
    31 May 2026 05: 42
    Our industry must keep pace with the times. Already in the first months of WWII, a huge number of air defense weapons of the era appeared. These included anti-aircraft guns, anti-aircraft machine guns, aerostats, and searchlights. Of course, there are new weapons now. But we need to know the weapons of foreign forces and what needs to be implemented. There's no time to waste. Belarus has developed a laser weapon capable of incinerating drones at an altitude of 500 meters. We also need similar weapons. All bureaucratic red tape must be eliminated. Everything must be aimed at ensuring the superiority of our technology over foreign ones.
  9. +6
    31 May 2026 05: 54
    Quote: V.
    There's the Pantsir-S mobile air defense system, which has been frequently advertised and shown on TV. It detects and shoots down everything from small UAVs to missiles and aircraft. The detection range is 80 km, and the destruction range is up to 20-40 km. I'm saying this because how many of these are needed for the Novorossiya highway, which is 700 km long? Why aren't they deployed to patrol the highway? There are also air defense aircraft and helicopters that can also patrol the skies over Novorossiya. Who is responsible for the air defense of this territory? soldier

    The cost of firing even a small missile at a Pantsir is several times higher than the cost of a drone. Patrols by aircraft and helicopters are also expensive, plus the cost of air-to-air missiles.
    We need inexpensive, effective air defense/missile defense, laser/electromagnetic pulse/microwave weapons—something similar, perhaps a combination. This would make the cost per shot much lower than that of a drone. We could also deploy aerostats equipped with early warning systems for missiles and drones along the border, linked into a single system.
    Well, the second is the destruction of those who give orders for the launch and who launch these drones.
    The second is even the first.
    But this requires serious work and large investments, involving leading scientists.
    And we are already on the offensive in all directions.
    ASTANA, May 29 – RIA Novosti. Russian troops are advancing in all directions in the Northern Military District, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated.
    1. 0
      31 May 2026 13: 37
      Read the book "Murder and Overkill" (Lapp Ralph.) 1964; Year of publication: 1964;
      Even then, the cost of protection from offensive weapons was higher than the offensive weapons themselves!
    2. 0
      2 June 2026 21: 21
      A drone is essentially a big fly. What if we used flytraps to catch drones? It would be cheap.
  10. +1
    31 May 2026 06: 09
    Quote: Stas157
    While we ask management to disrupt their logistics - bridges, tunnels, electricity, depots, replacement of wheel sets - they disrupt our logistics.

    And you, sir, are 100% right. The Goslog system, despite its supposed usefulness, has been proven to complicate and disrupt logistics. It's like tying a weight to someone's leg and forcing them to do the same thing they wouldn't otherwise. Anyone familiar with logistics knows this.
  11. + 24
    31 May 2026 06: 11
    One gets the impression that in the 5th year of the SVO, someone is living out their best life, while hundreds of thousands, if not millions, are dying and suffering.
    But the saddest thing is that the position looks cowardly and helpless.
    How did it happen that the menacing bravado in 22 minutes turned into some kind of bleating, to which, of course, no one pays attention anymore?
  12. -1
    31 May 2026 07: 03
    Is there no way to deliver fuel by sea?
    1. +4
      31 May 2026 09: 37
      Quote: Aleksandral
      Is there no way to deliver fuel by sea?

      Where to? The oil depot in Feodosia is destroyed, a tanker wouldn't reach the one in Sevastopol—it would be sunk (it's been empty for a long time, so they don't bomb the Sevastopol depot), and the oil depots in Bakhchisarai and Oktyabrsky have no access to the sea.
    2. +6
      31 May 2026 10: 58
      We don't control the sea... The backers control it.
  13. + 17
    31 May 2026 07: 15
    But back in '23, it became clear that the longer the Cold War dragged on, the worse the situation would become for us. In every sense: militarily, economically, and politically. After all, unfortunately, Russia is a pitiful shadow of the Union that was capable of withstanding the economic and military might of all of Europe. Moreover, a complete military victory is required; Minsk and Istanbul will tell you the truth. But for some reason, the authorities can't shake off the Leopold's Cat syndrome, unwilling to understand that happy endings only happen in cartoons. It's high time to understand that with this approach, we are doomed to stand alone in the confrontation with the West—everyone has already come to believe in our weakness and, naturally, is joining the expected victors in the hopes of getting their share of the spoils.
    1. +2
      31 May 2026 13: 49
      How can we get rid of Leopold the Cat syndrome? After all, if we continue to wage war as we do now, the seizure of the yacht "Scheherazade" might be lifted, but if we start a war, it certainly won't be lifted, and many other things could be seized. crying
  14. -4
    31 May 2026 07: 35
    Assembly-line production could equal the number of drones produced, and potentially even surpass them. Both sides need to prepare for a transport collapse.
    In any case, it is a competition of conveyors and engineers.
    When they run out of cars, they will start hunting people.
    The key vulnerability of drones is their plastic body and delicate electronics. In this form, they cannot be shielded from electrical impulses. If they are made with protection against electrical impulses, they will be visible to radar, which is already clear from combat tactics.
    Therefore, if we are to work out a fundamental solution to the problem, it will be through electrical impulses.
    1. +5
      31 May 2026 07: 52
      Quote from Kuziming
      Therefore, if we are to work out a fundamental solution to the problem, it will be through electrical impulses.

      You seem to be an expert in this field. Tell me about its range and energy?
      1. -2
        31 May 2026 08: 34
        I'm not an engineer, I can understand the general principle, but precise calculations are a task for specialists.
        1. 0
          31 May 2026 09: 47
          Quote from Kuziming
          I'm not an engineer

          Then, before writing, it's worth inquiring how much energy is needed and what size equipment is required so that an electromagnetic pulse at a distance of at least 500 meters disrupts the operation of electrical systems.
          1. -1
            31 May 2026 15: 22
            Then think about what needs to be added to the diagram, for example, an aerosol cloud, ejected conductive threads, for an infantryman even 10 meters are important, for an armored personnel carrier too.
            1. 0
              31 May 2026 21: 07
              Quote from Kuziming
              Then think about what needs to be added to the diagram, for example, an aerosol cloud, ejected conductive threads, for an infantryman even 10 meters are important, for an armored personnel carrier too.

              As you can see, it's not used, even though everyone wants to live. So, its effectiveness is zero.
  15. +9
    31 May 2026 10: 08
    Urgently, urgently, create another ministry to combat the Hornets. With all the necessary staff, cars, service apartments, and hefty salaries. Ugh...
    1. +2
      31 May 2026 14: 45
      With all the necessary staff, cars, service apartments and solid salaries.
      Forgot about blackjack and sh...
    2. +1
      31 May 2026 15: 57
      Quote: Evgeny_Sviridenko
      Urgently, urgently create another ministry to combat the Hornets. With all the necessary staff, cars, company apartments, and hefty salaries. Wow...

      This already happened with the previous Minister of Defense's staff of generals' wives, young and beautiful whores. They were all fired. Are you suggesting we bring them back together?
      1. +2
        31 May 2026 16: 33
        In the Novgorod region, a ministry for combating UAVs is being created...
  16. +3
    31 May 2026 15: 36
    And it will only get worse; with such power, the "SVO" could have unpredictable consequences for the country.
  17. +1
    31 May 2026 19: 46
    Unfortunately, the Russian leadership is full of incompetents.
    1. 0
      31 May 2026 20: 27
      "We were deceived." Question: who is it US? Maybe YOU!
  18. 0
    31 May 2026 20: 53
    Quote: V.
    There's the Pantsir-S mobile air defense system, which has been frequently advertised and shown on TV. It detects and shoots down everything from small UAVs to missiles and aircraft. The detection range is 80 km, and the destruction range is up to 20-40 km. I'm saying this because how many of these are needed for the Novorossiya highway, which is 700 km long? Why aren't they deployed to patrol the highway? There are also air defense aircraft and helicopters that can also patrol the skies over Novorossiya. Who is responsible for the air defense of this territory? soldier

    And you should inquire about the production period, let alone the same Panshchiri and how many of them die every day, there are none, there is nothing to cover them with, but Podolyaka insists that this is a lie and a provocation, apparently someone promised him something, otherwise, he is just a chatterbox.
  19. 0
    31 May 2026 20: 56
    Quote: U. Cheny
    But back in '23, it became clear that the longer the Cold War dragged on, the worse the situation would become for us. In every sense: militarily, economically, and politically. After all, unfortunately, Russia is a pitiful shadow of the Union that was capable of withstanding the economic and military might of all of Europe. Moreover, a complete military victory is required; Minsk and Istanbul will tell you the truth. But for some reason, the authorities can't shake off the Leopold's Cat syndrome, unwilling to understand that happy endings only happen in cartoons. It's high time to understand that with this approach, we are doomed to stand alone in the confrontation with the West—everyone has already come to believe in our weakness and, naturally, is joining the expected victors in the hopes of getting their share of the spoils.

    Actually, it was understandable when the president was elected for his first term, he'd be skiing. If you don't believe me, look at the news transcripts from those years.
  20. 0
    31 May 2026 20: 59
    Quote: Evgeny_Sviridenko
    In the Novgorod region, a ministry for combating UAVs is being created...

    We also rearmed the army, adopted the 2020 programs, doubled GDP, raised living standards, and fought inflation, although its annual markups on all major types of fuel and other resources and services won out.
  21. 0
    31 May 2026 21: 00
    Quote: Esaul
    And it will only get worse; with such power, the "SVO" could have unpredictable consequences for the country.

    You are wrong, the conditions have long been announced: reduction of the army and navy, payment of reparations, haven’t you heard?
  22. 0
    1 June 2026 09: 09
    It's easy to flood the Kyiv metro with one blow; half of Kyiv is in the lowlands. But we're drawing a bold red line again.
  23. 0
    1 June 2026 10: 02
    I once saw a video from one of our military bloggers that said we were finishing testing and starting to deliver similar drones to the troops. They had so-called "machine vision," where the main thing was to guide the drone to a designated area and that was it. But somehow this topic has died down. Meanwhile, the enemy is already actively using them.
  24. 0
    1 June 2026 12: 16
    In recent weeks, Ukraine has begun actively launching strikes using Hornet and RAM-2X medium-range drones against trucks and fuel tankers on the R-280 "Novorossiya" highway, which leads to Crimea from the Rostov region through new territories.
    I propose creating mobile groups of three mobile (wheeled) radars with side-looking AESA (a distant analogy is the Strelka system used by the State Traffic Safety Inspectorate). They travel along the highway and continuously scan the air in an azimuth of 0 to 360 degrees and a microwave beam tilt angle of 5 to 45 degrees to the horizon. The distance between the three radars is approximately a kilometer. As soon as a radar detects a moving target—a Hornet or RAM-2X drone—the mobile radar determines the distance to the target and transmits its coordinates and distance from the target to the command center computer. There, using the data from the three radars, the target's location (latitude, longitude, altitude) is determined and transmitted to the nearest mobile fire group and to the nearest trucks and fuel tankers on the R-280 highway that could be attacked. It is possible to get by with two mobile radars, but then the target’s altitude will be unknown.
  25. 0
    1 June 2026 21: 14
    Quote from Kuziming
    I'm not an engineer, I can understand the general principle, but precise calculations are a task for specialists.


    Colleague, Hello!
    If you still have a TV and live in a high-rise building in the city, and there's a building across the street about 30 meters away, try changing the channels on the other people's TVs. They have a specially designed lens in the ball (the receiving LED) and interference rejection to give your TV remote a better chance.
    The drone doesn't have a lens in the ball. You need to use the remote control's signal to reach the generator. It's designed to prevent interference. This simply makes the generator unstable. And to burn it out, you need an even bigger remote control.
  26. +1
    1 June 2026 21: 15
    Quote: Svetlana
    In recent weeks, Ukraine has begun actively launching strikes using Hornet and RAM-2X medium-range drones against trucks and fuel tankers on the R-280 "Novorossiya" highway, which leads to Crimea from the Rostov region through new territories.
    I propose creating mobile groups of three mobile (wheeled) radars with side-looking AESA (a distant analogy is the Strelka system used by the State Traffic Safety Inspectorate). They travel along the highway and continuously scan the air in an azimuth of 0 to 360 degrees and a microwave beam tilt angle of 5 to 45 degrees to the horizon. The distance between the three radars is approximately a kilometer. As soon as a radar detects a moving target—a Hornet or RAM-2X drone—the mobile radar determines the distance to the target and transmits its coordinates and distance from the target to the command center computer. There, using the data from the three radars, the target's location (latitude, longitude, altitude) is determined and transmitted to the nearest mobile fire group and to the nearest trucks and fuel tankers on the R-280 highway that could be attacked. It is possible to get by with two mobile radars, but then the target’s altitude will be unknown.


    Do we have all this wonderful stuff today in such quantity?
  27. -1
    1 June 2026 21: 18
    Quote from Etwas
    Quote: Evgeny_Sviridenko
    In the Novgorod region, a ministry for combating UAVs is being created...

    We also rearmed the army, adopted the 2020 programs, doubled GDP, raised living standards, and fought inflation, although its annual markups on all major types of fuel and other resources and services won out.


    Why be sarcastic? With hindsight, each of us would have done everything better.
  28. -1
    1 June 2026 21: 21
    Quote: Valery Mamai
    "We were deceived." Question: who is it US? Maybe YOU!


    And I don't like what's happening.
    But you also went to every election and voted. And in 2022, did you also write that you were deceived? And in previous years?
  29. 0
    2 June 2026 04: 12
    Are we running out of MANPADS or can't they destroy a target like a Hornet? What's so hard about saturating the entire front and rear with them and hitting them everywhere?
  30. +1
    2 June 2026 07: 44
    Quote from Fangaro
    Do we have all this wonderful stuff today in such quantity?

    It seems that the beautiful is far away.
  31. +1
    2 June 2026 11: 40
    I don't know, maybe it's just me who's seen the light, and it's been that way for a long time. It's not about tactics or weapons, but the fact that the current Russian state is incapable of winning wars, developing the economy, or science. It has only one goal: profit for its founders. Some people don't like it, but what can you do? It's capitalism.
  32. +1
    3 June 2026 14: 18
    Such military logic is flawed, since in such a case the Ukrainian Armed Forces would begin to attack any trucks, including civilian ones.

    Military logic dictates losing as little as possible (in terms of cost) as the enemy. The problem is simple: how much does one Hornet cost, how much does one truck cost (including civilian ones), how many Hornets are needed to destroy one truck, and how much money is spent on defense against Hornets.
    Example: disguise a water or concrete tanker as a fuel tanker, equip it with Hornet countermeasures (fog, blinding, active defense, etc.), and deploy it on patrol along the highway. It attracts and destroys a dozen Hornets worth approximately $100,000, but it itself incurs $10,000 in costs and requires repairs worth $10,000.
  33. 0
    4 June 2026 01: 29
    These attacks by the Ukrainian Reich are not just a PR stunt; they are a systematic attempt to intimidate the population, aimed at disrupting the holiday season in southern Russia.
    It has long been clear that drones will hunt not only military equipment.
    The Ukrainian Wehrmacht was trained by colleagues from the IDF.
    And the Judeofascists have a huge amount of experience in the genocide of "inferior" nations!
    For example, the successfully used Lavender target search system.
    The Ukrainian Wehrmacht adopted it.
    The system issues a command to attack a tank, a man with a machine gun in his hand. The attack occurs, and the target is destroyed. There are no targets, Lavender lowers the threshold, and the target is now a fuel truck/man in camouflage.
    Are the targets destroyed? If there are no others, Lavender lowers the bar again – now the target is a school bus/just a person!
    This is a simplified diagram of how AIs like Lavender and Palantir determine who to kill.
    When the supply of UAVs to the Ukrainian Luftwaffe increases by another 2-4 times, the threshold will be lowered to the limit.
    This is how it was in Palestine.
    At first, the Judeofascist drones were targeting the top brass of Hezbollah, and now Lavender is giving orders to kill children.
    It won't be any different for us either.
    Like Judeofascism, the Kyiv regime can only be defeated by the total annihilation of the entire top brass and their inner circle, right down to their grandnephews. This undead must be rooted out down to the last rotten chromosome.