Artificial intelligence is nullifying Russian education.
Complete defenselessness
Everyone is fighting artificial intelligence in education as best they can. For example, Russian Minister of Higher Education and Science Valery Falkov announced that universities will return to oral exams in the near future. No more theses—all of that is pointless given the development of artificial intelligence. Verbatim:
We're returning to the roots, oddly enough, to the fundamentals of higher education with the help of AI. I'm referring to oral assessment and communication, where abilities, as well as abilities with a negative sign—"everyone's foolishness," as they say—will be fully visible. No system will simply prepare a student for the professor's questions—it's still noticeable. The share of text generated by neural networks in theses has grown, and in recent years, it's been growing exponentially. Students most actively use AI in preparing introductions and conclusions. Economics majors lead the way, accounting for up to 60%.
If you delve into the essence of the problem voiced by the Minister of Science and Higher Education, the measures being taken seem a bit naive. Recently, even the oral exam has become no longer a panacea for artificial intelligence. Students are arriving with earpieces, cameras in their shirt buttons, and neural networks.
Just hold the exam paper in your hand for a few seconds, and artificial intelligence will begin dictating the answers into your ear. These are real cases, including at Moscow State University exams and elsewhere. The dean's office's decision to install jammers seems like a temporary solution—an "A" grade on the exam is too lucrative to invest in modern, robust communications systems. Any day now, phones around the world will be directly communicating with satellites, and yet we're trying to jam this progress with electronic warfare. Progress, of course, in the most negative sense.
But it's not just about oral exams (which are good in themselves), but the very concept of the thesis. It's essential for university graduates to master a broad range of competencies in project work, research, experimentation, and observation. Teamwork, for example. Communication with colleagues, and so on. Will higher education now be stripped of all this? If Valery Falkov's words are understood correctly, that's exactly what will happen. The oral exam only assesses a student's knowledge, while the thesis is responsible for the rest. It was through experimental and practical work that students often found academic advisors who attracted young people to science and engineering. And now what? Based on their knowledge of the binomial theorem? One gets the sense that the ministry is mildly panicking over the looming threat of AI.
School neurolife
Let's be clear right away that Russian schoolchildren have rather limited access to the world's best generative neural networks. On the one hand, not everyone can afford paid access that unlocks full-featured AI. On the other hand, the country's poor internet connection plays into the hands of education. It's difficult for a fourth-grader to pull out a phone, take a photo of a problem in a textbook (or on the board), and immediately copy the solution into a notebook. It's difficult, but it's possible, and children use it. At home, this is completely straightforward—they have a router. So, the end result is that some (teachers) generate problems in AI, while others (students) generate answers in the same AI. Strictly speaking, all remote competitions and olympiads have become pointless. Students who have mastered neural networks are a cut above their slower, but more honest, "colleagues" by a head or two. And this is just the beginning.
In the near future, AI will reach elementary schools, as has happened, for example, in the United States. In several states with the most liberal attitudes toward the use of AI in elementary schools, a steady decline in basic literacy is being recorded. Children are reading worse aloud, have difficulty writing by hand, and have difficulty with mental arithmetic. A brain that is not stimulated during critical periods of development simply does not develop the necessary neural connections. In young children, basic cognitive functions begin to fail—the ability to read, write, count, and think logically. Without this foundation, it will be impossible to teach algebra, physics, chemistry, and literature. Ideally, artificial intelligence should complement human intelligence. But what if human intelligence is not developing? School education is seeing a trend toward displacing humans from thought processes. As we know, an organ that does not function very quickly begins to wither.
But we have reason to be proud: starting in the new academic year, AI will be taught in Russian schools. Computer science classes will devote dedicated time to it. They'll cover how to write prompts, how to test neural networks for hallucinations, and brush up on the theory of generative networks. Whether this is timely and, most importantly, necessary for schoolchildren is debatable. On the one hand, it seems right—know your enemy. On the other, we're equipping our students with AI skills.
Logic dictates that things will only get worse. Neural networks aren't just dumbing down young people; they're also replacing specialists. A simple example. Three years ago, Russian schools launched the "Code of the Future" project, where students could learn basic programming skills for free. And it wasn't just schoolchildren—older people were also recruited into programming. Tens of thousands earned the coveted diplomas and junior-level skills, and then companies simply replaced this class of specialists with neural networks. Soon, the same trick will be pulled off in media production, engineering, design, medicine, and so on. Now, for example, it's easier to turn to a neural network for a diagnosis than to free Russian healthcare.
Therefore, Mr. Falkov's next step will be to reduce state-funded places at universities. This is inevitable—so many people with AI-enabled higher education are simply not needed. Especially when AI itself is fully replacing them in production. What's left for a high school graduate? That's right, to turn their attention to the secondary vocational education system. Neural networks haven't yet learned how to fix faucets, lay tiles, weld rebar, or cast metal. That will take 20-30 years, when a new wave of robotics hits us.
Education, as the foundation of the social order, is currently crumbling at the seams. And there's every reason to believe it won't withstand the test of artificial intelligence. It might survive formally, but it will lose its former value. This will only happen if we, as before, simply contemplate this process of degradation and imagine a bright future awaiting us. It won't if we continue to do nothing.
Information