Military Review

Defiled by liberalism

43
Defiled by liberalism



Thinking about the essence of liberalism, I was pushed by the latest events in our country, which are actively covered in the media. And although the topic is rather trashed, it is very important, and it’s worth talking about it all the time. The statements of individual representatives of circles that identify themselves with the liberal ones could not remain unnoticed by the patriotic part of the society. I refer to her first of all those people who fought or are fighting for their Motherland on various fronts - military, informational, labor. They fight because they believe in the future of their country, are proud of its past and honor their compatriots who have once inscribed their name on the glorious pages of Russian stories. Listening to our liberal representatives, with all my desire I cannot hear sounds that even remotely resemble the noise of a battle for the future of Russia. And more and more often there are suspicions that they are fighting completely on the opposite side. Maybe I have a hearing problem?

“The Russian people are in many ways like cattle” (Evgenia Chirikova)
“It’s a shame not to steal such a state” (Mikhail Khodorkovsky)
“It's okay that some pensioners are dying out ... but society will become more mobile” (Yegor Gaidar)
"" What are you worried about these people? Well, thirty million will die out. They did not fit into the market. Do not think about it - new ones will grow "(Anatoly Chubais)
“What innovations are there, what industry! The fate of Russia - to export oil and other raw materials! Forget the rest! ”(Igor Yurgens)
"I think that one of the greatest tragedies for Russia is the adoption of Orthodoxy ... I think that Orthodoxy was a heavy burden for Russia" (Vladimir Pozner)

The overall picture is completed by the words of Leonid Gozman about the "scum" that on 9 May waving red flags from the windows of German cars. And also about the modern generation of Russians, which has nothing to do with the generation of winners, and therefore with the Day of the Great Victory. No matter how bitter it is to hear the above-mentioned rudeness towards the Motherland, it proves that everything is in perfect order with my hearing.

“Our Russian liberal is, above all, a lackey and he only looks at how to clean up somebody’s boots.” This famous phrase belongs to the outstanding Russian writer Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky. How relevant is it after so many years! Russian liberalism, like many trends that have come to us from the outside, has quite specific features. And the main one is, perhaps, a diligent blackening of its own history. It seems that today's liberals do not directly deny the great victories of the past, but then they try to find negative sides in them, they try so hard that the uneducated person may ask: did they have any victories and victories? Citizens who are not indifferent to the history of their country, people whose ancestors defended the honor of the Fatherland in difficult times, all those who love their country as their own Mother, such mud showering naturally causes the most negative emotions towards, so to speak, “accusers ". Hence the emotional articles about "lampshades from the ancestors of the current liberals." Of course, such statements to anyone should not be allowed, but one unpleasant fact is striking. The party that allowed itself this statement, realizing the search, immediately apologized. However, none of our respected liberals apologized for the heap of impurities that they poured on the state, on the people representing it .. They always consider themselves to be right in everything, well, and the people are such an ignoramus, they say that they didn’t even grow up to freedom. Dear sirs and unaware that a significant part of Russian people despise such freedom with the soul of the people .. freedom to spit on the past of their country, its present and even its future. People are tired of liberal tales about fair market economy, when everyone parasites everyone, about the importance of individualism, when a person looks at a person as a competitor, about democracy, which in its current forms looks more like a collective dictatorship. At the same time, everything that has been dear to our people for decades has been sown with mud, the thought of the wrong path that the country has been following for many years, the utopianism of communist ideas is being driven into people's heads ... And who has actually proved this? Who decided for the people how to live better? Liberal representatives like to talk about honesty, so let's honestly admit that if there had been no forced collapse of the USSR, the Union would still be alive, such was the will of the Soviet citizens in a referendum! Newly appeared rulers wanted to sneeze on people's opinion!

Fast forward to a more distant past. In the courtyard of 1825 year, known for the uprising of the Decembrists, who became one of the first carriers of liberal values ​​in Russia. As Griboyedov aptly said, by the way confessing the same values, but in a slightly different way, “a hundred ensigns want to change the whole state of life in Russia, I told them that they were fools”. Notice, it says liberal, progressive. So why did he, in fact, oppose his like-minded people ?! The fact is that Alexander Sergeevich, being a Russian diplomat, state adviser, was aware of the entire destructiveness of the situation when liberal ideas served as a weapon against the Russian state. He was a rare example for our country of a person who used liberal thought for the good of his Fatherland. Be more precisely such liberals and who knows how our people would treat today to this trend.

Alas, patriotic liberals in our country were rather the exception. Unlike the same England, where liberalism has always stood guard over state interests. Let's remember together the great achievements of our state, which cause a sense of pride. By a surprising coincidence, none of them falls into those historical periods when the liberal elites "ruled" the country. Moreover, these same segments for Russia became fatal, twice over the past hundred years, almost putting an end to the very existence of the state. Gentlemen liberals and their like-minded people do not like to talk about it, and if they do, they immediately disown their involvement in the collapse of a century-old empire. Bloody Stalin is to blame for all the troubles, there are calls for carrying out a similarity to the Nuremberg process in relation to communism, whereas a large part of the population, I think, would not mind replacing the word “communism” with “liberalism” in this sentence. Speaking of the latter, I mean precisely Russian liberalism as a phenomenon somewhat different from the western equivalent of this concept.

I do not want to offend anyone, but looking at the behavior of our esteemed liberal intellectuals, the analogy with a ram comes in its head, fiercely beating its head against the mirror, struggling with its reflection. Leonid Gozman, for example, is constantly trying to denounce the “bloody Stalinist regime,” which, in his opinion, brought enormous damage to the country and people, but as soon as attempts are made to expose the liberal reforms of the 90s, which by the way caused no less damage, but perhaps, at times more, indignantly protesting against such accusations, posing as a standard of honesty and justice. Another glorious statesman, Ilya Ponomarev, shouts the loudest about the need to fight corruption, the lack of transparency of the financial system, and at the same time the scandal with the Skolkovo Foundation, from which Illya illegally and by an incomprehensible scheme gained a huge amount of money, is gaining momentum. Ponomarev kindly ignored the request to return them. So who are you fighting, gentlemen? It turns out that the main misfortune of the unpopularity of liberal ideas in Russia lies in the people that they are voiced. They speak beautifully, emotionally, but completely in a strange, unpleasant Russian rumor language. Liberalism in our country will have at least some success only when dear gentlemen begin to defend the interests of their homeland, and not run for support to the American ambassador and do not shout at every turn about the crimes of their country against "free humanity." Alas, there is no hint of this.

In conclusion, I would like to apologize to our dear Veterans for all the brazen lies that they hear when they once again throw mud at those values ​​for which our grandfathers and great-grandfathers fought for. Sometimes you are terrified when you try to equate communism with fascism, SMERSH to the SS .. when it is said with contempt that the USSR fought extremely ineptly, hence such big losses .. when in the 1812 war, the main winner of Napoleon is General Moroz .. there are many examples. And if more recently such statements would have sounded blasphemous, today, unfortunately, they are not ashamed to voice them in the most serious programs on central television channels. At the same time, a lot of various experts were trying to provide, in their opinion, undeniable facts. To determine that delirium, submitted as a fact, does not cease to be a delirium can only be a person who knows the symptoms of this disease, and it is very important that as many of such sensible people as possible remain in our society. This will be a reliable guarantee that we will not wake up one day in the Stone Age, without our own great history and national heroes.

So what is the essence of today's liberalism? It is his Russian components? In my opinion, the essence lies in the inability to think and act constructively, for the benefit of Russia. The ideology of the Russian Empire, with its postulates of first building the World Christian Empire, later “Orthodoxy. Autocracy. Nationalities, brought up morally and spiritually. Soviet communism indicated the ultimate goal, towards which our people reached colossal scientific, military and industrial heights. Russian liberalism ended the royal empire, effectively abolishing the army at the height of the First World War, and by the end of the century, the people were impoverished in poverty about democracy and prosperity during the terrible wars and cataclysms. At the same time, no gentle creations, like the first satellite, radio or moon rover, could be demonstrated by the liberals during their time in power. They boasted only abstract and obscure to most of the population voucherization, building a market economy, privatization, etc. Against the background of past victories and breakthroughs, all this does not look impressive at all. But our liberal intelligentsia is trying hard to prove the opposite. Such are the mysterious people.
Author:
43 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Denis
    Denis 23 May 2013 06: 10 New
    17
    I think that one of the greatest tragedies for Russia is the adoption of Orthodoxy ...
    And what else can one expect from the mishandled Cossack posner, where did he grow up? So it works out
    1. vilenich
      vilenich 23 May 2013 07: 01 New
      +4
      Quote: Denis
      And what else can one expect from the mishandled Cossack posner, where did he grow up? So it works out

      So he does not hide, and even flaunts it!
      “In Russia, only my work holds me. I am not a Russian person, this is not my homeland, I did not grow up here, I don’t feel completely at home here - and I suffer a lot from this. I feel like a stranger in Russia. And if I don’t have a job, I’ll go where I feel at home. Most likely, I will leave for France, ”- Vladimir Pozner.

      Here he is suffering and riveting loot! I would buy him a ticket today!
      1. Denis
        Denis 23 May 2013 07: 14 New
        +5
        Quote: vilenich
        I would buy him a ticket today!
        And let him ask!
        There were precedents not so long ago and with the same
        He bugged a ticket and forgiveness, and then everyone to the joy of that ...
        1. krokodil25
          krokodil25 23 May 2013 09: 36 New
          +1
          I think that all these liberal figures need to be gathered together and sent to their liberal Euros ... well! Let them Arabs milestone them there liberalize! angry
      2. Hort
        Hort 23 May 2013 11: 44 New
        0
        I would buy him a ticket today!
        to Wrangel Island
        1. Georgs
          Georgs 23 May 2013 15: 27 New
          0
          Quote: hort
          to Wrangel Island

          It’s good to go to Igarka or to Taimyr, to send permafrost to jump airfields smile
          Ecology, there, clean air, unloading nutrition, healthy physical activity. Clean resort!
    2. patline
      patline 23 May 2013 11: 41 New
      +4
      Liberalism is the destruction of community.
      1. Andrey78
        Andrey78 23 May 2013 20: 27 New
        0
        Well, what are you so angry with the liberals, they want to teach us how to live properly, and we are beyond the Arctic Circle. It will have to work there in order to survive, because the bears will not understand what they are told about tolerance, conformism and other isms
    3. reichsmarshal
      reichsmarshal 23 May 2013 21: 54 New
      0
      Nonsense! Tolerance is not an ideology, but a policy. In the United States, where everyone has a trunk, or even two, tolerance is a vital social factor. stability. Otherwise - civil war, but they need it? In Russia, the authorities have always oppressed and humiliated their people. True, under Stalin it was and should be, but neither before nor after him - no. Therefore, tolerance as a principle is meaningless in Russia. But this is a consequence of the actions of the authorities, and not of the very principle of tolerance. If Posner is American in spirit, why condemn him? It is necessary to condemn those who deprived our people of the right to bear arms in order to use it against such as these posner-gozmans and Co., those who allowed them to appear on our TV. First of all, it is the fault of those who brought Orthodoxy to the brain with his "hit on one cheek ..."
  2. Denis
    Denis 23 May 2013 06: 13 New
    +6
    Quote: Denis
    I think that one of the greatest tragedies for Russia is the adoption of Orthodoxy ...
    And what else can one expect from the mishandled Cossack posner, where did he grow up? So it works out

    And the whole list is firing. Perform and the air will become cleaner
    1. smel
      smel 23 May 2013 06: 48 New
      +8
      And the whole list is firing.
      I guess, that still lampshades are better. And I will not apologize to the liberal cattle that are indicated in the article ... Not a journalist
      1. omsbon
        omsbon 23 May 2013 09: 48 New
        +1
        Quote: smel
        And I will not apologize to the liberal cattle that are indicated in the article ... Not a journalist

        Pavel, take to the company, I'm not a journalist either and I'm not used to apologizing to cattle!
      2. Georgs
        Georgs 23 May 2013 15: 29 New
        -1
        Quote: smel
        I think that lampshades are better.

        No, phew! It will stink from them. Better, after all, to permafrost.
        1. smel
          smel 23 May 2013 20: 39 New
          0
          As the Russians said, there is no better smell than the stench of a rotting enemy
  3. George
    George 23 May 2013 06: 28 New
    +7
    Alas, liberal patriots in our country were more likely an exception. In contrast to the same England, where liberalism has always stood guard over state interests.

    Here are our liberals and guard the interests of England
  4. Pit
    Pit 23 May 2013 06: 33 New
    +9
    What is Russian liberalism? Frankly speaking, this newcomer and brought this infection was from England and worked for the good of England.
    Now works for the benefit of the legal successor of England to the United States.
    So the word "liberal" in our case should be read as "foreign agent of influence." And accordingly, they should not be put on television and radio, but put as hostile saboteurs. Because these devirsants cause damage to our homeland even more than terrorists with bombs.
    1. alexng
      alexng 23 May 2013 09: 11 New
      10
      In Russia, liberalists have to flip flippers. And the faster, the better it will be for everyone.

      There is a rally on the Swamp. Speaker:
      - Thanks to United Russia, Putin's plan and national projects, a new hospital has not yet been built in the city of Zapendryuchinsk!
      A voice from the crowd:
      - I was in this Zapendryuchinsk, a new hospital is already standing there.
      Speaker:
      - Thanks to United Russia, Putin’s plan and national projects in the village of Starokhrenovo, they promised and did not build a new farm!
      The same voice from the crowd:
      - I was there, a new farm is already flaunting ...
      Speaker:
      - And you, in order to control the situation, do not have to drive through any holes, but rather surf the Internet more often!
      1. Pit
        Pit 23 May 2013 10: 51 New
        +2
        Quote: alexneg
        And you, in order to control the situation, do not have to drive through any holes, but rather surf the Internet more often!

        lol Strongly said And most importantly, to the point! good

        I still do not understand why the majority are trying to solve the worst minority?
        1. folds
          folds 23 May 2013 12: 47 New
          +1
          because it is more active. More fuss, stink, other PR - and this creates the feeling that all that is around us is them. And most work quietly and silently.
      2. Denis
        Denis 23 May 2013 15: 26 New
        +1
        Quote: alexneg
        to look at the Internet more often!
        It’s hard ...
        I accidentally crawled into mail.ru, could not stand it for a long time ...
        Такая помойка,типа http://go.mail.ru/realtime?q=%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0
        %B0%20Pussy%20Riot%20%D0%9C%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F%20%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%85%D
        0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8A%D1%8F%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B0%20%D0%B3%D0%
        BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BA%D1%83&fr=rtfr и пр.
  5. Petrovich-2
    Petrovich-2 23 May 2013 06: 34 New
    +6
    I agree with the author of the article: strangely enough, declaring themselves to be a creative class, these people did not do anything creative, creating. Their only creativity is to destroy, tear, set up against, discredit, humiliate, call ... This demonic creative is a substitute for real creativity.
    Such creativity cannot be an idea that moves people to high ideals.
    1. Vladimir_61
      Vladimir_61 23 May 2013 09: 40 New
      0
      Quote: Petrovich-2
      Such creativity cannot be an idea that moves people to high ideals.

      They are not engaged in creation - a destructive stench and are not capable of anything else. Ask any of them what is happening on Earth recently, they will not answer, because they do not know. They would have been horrified. We share daily in front of the new Noah's Ark. Russia will appear to them, only the scum of mankind will not have a place in it.
  6. fenix57
    fenix57 23 May 2013 06: 40 New
    +5
    "So what is the essence of today's liberalism? Precisely its Russian component? In my opinion, the essence lies in the inability to think and act constructively for the good of Russia."- but it seems to me that the essence of these liberos is in the desire to please their masters from across the ocean to destroy Russia not only as a state, but also as a country and with it destroy Russians as a people!
  7. awg75
    awg75 23 May 2013 06: 52 New
    +2
    something needs to be done with these liberals ... and urgently
    1. Hudo
      Hudo 23 May 2013 06: 58 New
      +1
      Quote: awg75
      something needs to be done with these liberals ... and urgently


      Something does not help, you need to shoot and land.
  8. treskoed
    treskoed 23 May 2013 06: 56 New
    +2
    At the same time, the liberals could not demonstrate any visual creations like the first satellite, radio or moon rover during their tenure in power

    Because deliberately did not want to! After all, their goal is to enrich themselves and topple over!
  9. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 23 May 2013 07: 00 New
    11
    I read articles not only here, they write a lot and smartly, sometimes even very abstrusely, but almost no one in essence. For example, they criticize socialism and humiliate the idea of ​​communism. They say that socialism is not viable, and communism is utopian. So all this is propaganda aimed at humiliating the people. What was the main mistake of the leadership in the USSR? they Communists naively believed that the first and necessary for socialism was to build the material base. Only the narrow-minded ideologists could not understand a man an insatiable creature, and therefore no matter how much you give, it’s not enough. Therefore, the basis of the foundations of any society, namely society and not the community of individuals, is education. Only by raising a new person with normal life principles can we talk about building a socially oriented society. If we educate individualists who think only of themselves, we will never build anything worthwhile. Such a society will always strive for slavery. Those who manage to snatch more will strive not to give anyone a chance to overtake themselves. This, by the way, is the main argument of the ideologists of a market economy, who argue that competition is good for society and for the economy. In conclusion, who will raise and educate a new generation, a generation of self-sufficient and decent people? So nobody, just because nobody needs it.
  10. logik
    logik 23 May 2013 07: 09 New
    0
    Quote: Petrovich-2
    declaring himself a creative class

    I agree. The bottom line is that they declare themselves white and fluffy, and do not reckon with the opinions of others.
  11. AKOL
    AKOL 23 May 2013 07: 10 New
    +5
    Until a law is passed prohibiting the vilification of their own state by at least citizens residing in its territory (here and now) until then they will muddy the country. Those. in the end, you need to answer for the bazaar.
  12. fenix57
    fenix57 23 May 2013 07: 23 New
    +1
    Quote: awg75
    something needs to be done with these liberals ... and urgently

    Yes, send them to .... that is, overseas! Let them scream from there. good
  13. Belogor
    Belogor 23 May 2013 07: 43 New
    +1
    "Our Russian liberal is, first and foremost, a lackey and is just watching how to clean his boots for someone." good A very apt expression of our classic.
    This is especially true of modern liberals, they say high words, but at the same time they continue to steal and mischief.
  14. Bigriver
    Bigriver 23 May 2013 07: 47 New
    +1
    "So what is the essence of today's liberalism? Precisely its Russian component? In my opinion, the essence lies in the inability to think and act constructively, for the good of Russia..."(by the author).

    And if you look even deeper ...
    Carriers of liberal ideas in Russia are non-Russian people. Neither in mentality, nor in culture, nor in conscience, morality and ethics do they fall into the multinational Russian people. These are the same rootless cosmopolitans, individualists. Hence their hatred of the people, a part of which they do not feel themselves. This is a potentially treacherous environment.
    Should they blame the inability to think and act constructively, for the good of Russia? No.
  15. k220150
    k220150 23 May 2013 07: 49 New
    +2
    "If anyone ruins Russia, they are damned liberals," said Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky. He was 1000% right. Now, instead of Dostoevsky, Solzhenitsyn. Like Chekhov, "You are Kashtanka against a man, it's like a carpenter against a carpenter." The carpenter from literature and politics Solzh and others like him are against Russian writers. Not to mention such "cryptologists of voids and blackbirds of common places" like G ... n, even thinking about him is disgusting.
  16. taseka
    taseka 23 May 2013 07: 51 New
    +3
    Chubais, Jurgens, Posner, Gozman - Russian liberals! ??? Do not make me laugh!!! laughing
  17. pensioner
    pensioner 23 May 2013 08: 02 New
    +4
    “It's okay that some pensioners are dying out ... but society will become more mobile” (Yegor Gaidar)

    Thank God many of them did not die out, but even vice versa! You survived, you are our mobile.
  18. valokordin
    valokordin 23 May 2013 09: 08 New
    +1
    Quote: retired
    Chubais, Jurgens, Posner, Gozman - Russian liberals! ??? Do not make me laugh!!!

    You can add to them, Svinadze, Mlechin, Pivozhorin, Solzhenitsyn, Gorbochavichus, Eltsind, Medvend, Ernst and so on, and so on, and so on ...
    Quote: retired

    Thank God many of them did not die out, but even vice versa! You survived, you are our mobile.

    They didn’t die out, They didn’t die out, but the remaining descendants and patrons of the slap spatter continue his work and strive to achieve this result.
    1. pensioner
      pensioner 23 May 2013 09: 17 New
      +3
      and survive them.
  19. k220150
    k220150 23 May 2013 09: 28 New
    +1
    All these guys - from Albats to Chubais, we will call "ben-abazhurovichi".
    1. pensioner
      pensioner 23 May 2013 10: 42 New
      +1
      All these guys - from Albats to Chubais, we will call "ben-abazhurovichi"


      .Ts-ss. Do not scare. And then they will run away. At the lampshade, the installation of equipment is completed. And the raw materials have already looked ...
  20. ed65b
    ed65b 23 May 2013 10: 28 New
    +4
    Yesterday I asked on Gozman's blog "Gozman are you mu .. how?" There is no answer apparently mud..k.
    1. pensioner
      pensioner 23 May 2013 10: 46 New
      0
      And you mu .. Day did not try? Although rather mud ..... ringing.
  21. vezunchik
    vezunchik 23 May 2013 10: 42 New
    +1
    “It's okay that some pensioners are dying out ... but society will become more mobile” (Yegor Gaidar)
    "" What are you worried about these people? Well, thirty million will die out. They did not fit into the market. Do not think about it - new ones will grow "(Anatoly Chubais)
    And how do these words differ from the calls of Hitler and Goebels?
    Why are Russians calling to defend their country declared fascists, and these fascists are not prosecuted ???
    1. Mairos
      Mairos 23 May 2013 13: 49 New
      0
      They are untouchable, they are rich or minority, or both at once. No way !!
  22. USNik
    USNik 23 May 2013 11: 08 New
    +1
    Better than a dead liberal, there can only be a hanged liberal.
  23. Hort
    Hort 23 May 2013 11: 45 New
    +2
    or maybe we’ll try to collect signatures under the appeal to the Gene. the prosecutor’s office to institute criminal proceedings against this Gozman?
  24. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 23 May 2013 12: 14 New
    +2
    In Russia, the term liberal has become an extremely abusive expression, and this is the merit of the liberals themselves.
  25. Goldkonstantin
    Goldkonstantin 23 May 2013 12: 32 New
    +2
    Liberals should not be taken seriously. These worship "Western values", which are so alien to the Russian people that it is not surprising why they only have supporters of young people who have been deliberately processed by Western propaganda. Empty chatter is their political program, the brainwashed ones are their electorate. Most of the citizens should not succumb to their sweet tales. Liberalism is corruption. For give a man freedom, he will return to the trees. That Gozman and others like him are trying to impose on Russia.
    1. Hort
      Hort 23 May 2013 16: 21 New
      +1
      no, it’s worth it and how it’s worth it! It is necessary to create a precedent so that for their filthy tongues and those trash that gozaman, Svanidze and others ... pounds are poured on Russia and its people, judged even by the same article 282 of the Criminal Code, and beaten in the street.
  26. seller trucks
    seller trucks 23 May 2013 14: 49 New
    +2
    that's really an article on the topic, on Tuesday I started reading the book by V. Medinsky "On Russian drunkenness, laziness and cruelty." well, just a summary for the book. All this liberal scum, they are trying to impose on us a stereotype about the helplessness, stupidity and laziness of the Russian people. Yes, to hell with you, gentlemen, liberals, all insolent in the face. The Russian people are hardworking, smart and somehow they will manage without your "help", as they say in Russia "disservice".
  27. Proud.
    Proud. 23 May 2013 15: 32 New
    +3
    A new history teacher comes to class:
    - My name is Michael Davidovich, I am a liberal. Now, get up in turn and introduce yourself as I do ...
    - My name is Masha, I am a liberal ...
    - My name is Daniel, I am a liberal ...
    - My name is Vovochka, I am a patriot.
    - Little Johnny, why are you a patriot ?!
    - My mother is a patriot, my father is a patriot, my friends are patriots and I am also a patriot.
    - Little Johnny, and if your mother were a prostitute, your dad was a drug addict, and your friends were fagots, who would you be ?!
    - Then I would definitely be a liberal.
  28. tank64rus
    tank64rus 23 May 2013 15: 46 New
    +1
    Liberators in Russia are agents of Western influence. He feeds them through various foundations and various "organizations" with a liberal bias. They have access to the media in Russia. And ha..at on Russia and its people. It is strange that the law enforcement agencies do not notice the clear calls of the liberals for unrest.
  29. Hort
    Hort 23 May 2013 16: 24 New
    +1
    And what’s significant: on the contrary, they are in every possible way blocking off their own. Remember the episode with the Urgant joke about the Red Komissar