Soviet experiments: starting a diesel engine using a gunpowder gas generator

4 787 16
Soviet experiments: starting a diesel engine using a gunpowder gas generator

In 1981, the Soviet Armored Vehicles Bulletin, a specialized journal dedicated to various researchers and innovations in the development, improvement, and operation of combat vehicles, published an interesting article on starting a diesel engine using a solid-fuel gas generator.

Although these devices never went into production, the article is quite interesting from a technical perspective, especially since the gas generator was tested on a BMP-1 engine rather than being calculated purely theoretically. So, it's highly recommended reading.




Starting system with solid fuel gas generator for diesel engine


The main drawback of electric and air-starting VGM diesel engines is a significant reduction in efficiency at low ambient temperatures (AT). Current requirements stipulate a pre-start time of no more than 15 minutes at AT = -40°C. At temperatures above -25°C, engine starting must be possible without preheating the coolant, oil, and battery electrolyte.

These requirements can be met by a system using the energy generated by the combustion of a solid propellant propellant charge. The gas generator is a source of thermal, potential (gas pressure), and kinetic energy of the gases. Two design options are possible: one with direct injection of gases into the engine cylinders and one with the use of gas energy in a special starter that rotates the crankshaft. tank engine.

The well-known powder starting system for multi-cylinder diesel engines has starting cartridges mounted on the cylinders, sequentially detonated by mechanically controlled strikers. The strikers are triggered by cam-type firing synchronizers connected to the engine shaft. Gases are supplied to each cylinder only during the first expansion stroke, which is not always sufficient for starting the diesel engine. Another disadvantage of this starting device is its complex design and the labor-intensive nature of reloading.


Research was conducted on a direct-start system (figure), in which hot gases from a single gas generator are fed into the engine cylinders through an air distributor and starting valves. The use of air-starting units for a system with a gas generator significantly simplifies the system design. Gases are fed into the engine cylinders in accordance with their firing order.

To reduce heat buildup and increase the reliability of the gas generator, the housing 4 is constructed using multiple layers. It consists of a load-bearing shell, a heat-insulating coating, and a thin-walled sleeve installed with a gap. The sleeve protects the heat-insulating coating from damage. Fuel element 5 is made of NDP-5A, a composite with a combustion temperature of 1600 K under normal conditions.

Reliable generator starting is ensured by a combined initiating device consisting of a UDP-2 pyrotechnic cartridge, a DRP propellant charge, and a RNDSI-5K propellant pellet. The charge and pellets are glued to the fuel element. The pyrotechnic cartridge 7 is installed in a threaded hole in the gas generator cover. The system is equipped with a safety membrane device, installed in adapter 3 upstream of discharge nozzle 1 and designed for an actuation pressure of 11,8–13,7 MPa. Cover 6 has a locking connection, ensuring rapid generator recharging.


Testing of the experimental starting system with a solid-fuel gas generator was conducted on a UTD-20 6-cylinder, 4-stroke engine. At tо.с. = 15 ÷ 20°C, MT-16P oil was used in the engine lubrication system; at sub-zero temperatures, low-viscosity MTZ-10P oil was used. The gas generator was connected to the diesel air distributor via a 1200 mm long gas duct. An LH-412 sensor was used to measure pressure, and an OR-310 temperature sensor was used to measure temperature.

Crankshaft speed was determined by the time and angle of its rotation, which was measured by an inductive sensor with a 1/114th-revolution marker. System performance during cranking (without fuel injection) of the UTD-20 engine was recorded with an oscilloscope (Table 1).


The obtained starting system parameters confirmed the accuracy of the preliminary calculations for gas flow rate Q and gas generator operating time. At all gas flow rates, the crankshaft speed was sufficient to start the engine under these conditions. When the gas generator was operating at Q = 45–56 g/s, the crankshaft speed increased significantly due to the increased gas temperature, which initiated oil ignition in some cylinders. When the gas generator was operating at flow rates starting at 30 g/s and fuel was supplied to the cylinders, the engine started on the first attempt in no more than 1 second.

To evaluate the gas consumption and gas generator operating time required for reliable engine starting at subzero ambient temperatures, start-up tests of the UTD-20 engine with an experimental starting system were conducted in a BMP-1. Cold starting of this diesel engine without starting aids is ensured down to a temperature of -5°C. Tests were conducted with and without a nozzle-less torch intake air heater (Table 2).


Tests have shown that a reliable start of the UTD-20 engine at tо.с. = -15°С requires a gas flow rate of ~75 g/s with the generator running for ~3 s. To ensure these gas generator parameters, a fuel element weighing ~225 g is required. Moreover, the gas pressure before the air distributor does not exceed the permissible values ​​for the UTD-20 engine (see Tables 1, 2).

Conclusion: The conducted studies have demonstrated the fundamental possibility of creating a solid-fuel launch system that is effective at low ambient temperatures.

Source:
"A Starting System with a Solid-Propellant Gas Generator for a Diesel Engine." S. Yu. Serebrennikov, Yu. A. Sukhoveev, V. N. Sysoev. "Bulletin of Armored Vehicles," No. 6, 1981.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    27 May 2026 04: 38
    What's most interesting is that this method of starting engines has been written about in fiction, and I've even come across it in films as a funny/interesting episode... so it seems that we weren't the only ones who used it. soldier
  2. +2
    27 May 2026 07: 08
    Eduard, excuse me, but I have a story for you. In Murmansk, there was this company called "Sefkholodflot." A brilliant idiot worked there. He'd worked his way up the ranks at NASA in the 70s, becoming the chief engineer of a floating base. Long story short, they stalled. They tried to start the diesel generator, and then the main engine. After numerous attempts to start the diesel generator, they ran out of high-pressure air. The chief engineer said, "Eureka! We're connecting the oxygen tank to the diesel air-start system!" They connected it, but I don't remember how they did it. There's no standard connection. But a team led by the Chief Engineer did it. As soon as they opened the oxygen cylinder valve, the diesel engine exploded and caught fire. I'll never forget the phrase in the article, "After the explosion and fire, the Chief Engineer REMOVED HIMSELF in his cabin." He was probably describing his experiment using alcohol-containing liquids to stimulate his brain. I don't remember how it ended for the base, but I think they dragged me to port by the nose. The Chief Engineer was kicked out of the fleet and given a diploma. I've had similar cases, but no one thought of starting a ship's diesel engine with an explosion.
    1. +5
      27 May 2026 07: 40
      Quote: tralflot1832
      I don't remember how we connected it. There's no standard connection. But a team led by Starmekh did it.

      They probably machined the adapter. But then they would have had to machine or weld a separate gas generation chamber into which to drip half a drop of oil before connecting the cylinder. In short, it almost resulted in a patent application—in life, it's always just a half-step from a patent application to stupidity.
    2. +1
      27 May 2026 08: 16
      Oxygen and oil are incompatible. The oxygen cylinder must be kept free of oil; you shouldn't touch it even with oil-soaked gloves.
      I don't know about modern diesel engines, but they used to have a decompressor. It opened all the valves, making it easier to turn the crankshaft. When preheating the engine with a blowtorch, it turned fairly easily. We turned the decompressor off at full speed, and the engine usually started right away. If that didn't work, we repeated the procedure.
      1. +1
        29 May 2026 20: 26
        Quote: Blacksmith 55
        I don't know about modern diesel engines, but they used to have a decompressor.

        I once had a diesel fire pump instead of an emergency gas generator, with an emergency compressor connected via a clutch. Naturally, it only started with a faulty starter. With the decompressor valve closed, it was impossible to turn it, and starting was out of the question.
        1. +1
          29 May 2026 20: 45
          A motor mechanic, that's how it was, with a decompressor. It used to be mandatory on tractors. They started the engine with the starter, first cranking the diesel engine with all valves open, then disengaged the decompressor with a lever, and if the engine started, they immediately disengaged the starter.
          Now they start it with a starter; as far as I know, there is no longer a decompressor.
        2. +1
          30 May 2026 08: 14
          Even the IZH Planeta had a decompressor, but it served more to blow out the cylinder if there was an oversuction.
    3. +4
      27 May 2026 15: 52
      Quote: tralflot1832
      but no one thought of starting a marine diesel engine with an explosion

      I saw in Afghanistan how a tank was started with a blank shot.
      1. +3
        27 May 2026 19: 50
        Not just in Afghanistan. Some tank crew I know told me about it.
    4. +1
      29 May 2026 20: 15
      Quote: tralflot1832
      No one thought of starting a marine diesel engine with an explosion.

      When I was a kid, I had an automatic transmission (ADG) that had an emergency start that worked like this: a container with a film strip inside and a small hole with a valve for a waterproof match was screwed into the head of the first cylinder. The film strip and matches were in the spare parts kit. The crankshaft was positioned, a lit match was dropped in, the valve was quickly closed, and the engine started.

      That's if you do everything right... My grandfather and I made a mistake the first time: we didn't take into account that a 4-stroke engine has two identical crankshaft positions per cycle, but the valve timing is different. Long story short, it hit me so hard that I've been deaf in my left ear since childhood. wassat
  3. +1
    27 May 2026 09: 52
    Actually, that's how they started the B-52 engines, with pyrotechnics. The Americans even carried spare flares.
    https://lenta.ru/news/2019/04/19/b52/
    1. +2
      27 May 2026 10: 10
      Half of the farm tractors were started with a 12-gauge cartridge. A blank. What difference does it make what creates the pressure?
      I think the key here is also the temperature. The gas from the burning grenade not only presses but also heats.
      1. +2
        27 May 2026 19: 52
        I don't know how to embed videos now.
        https://yandex.ru/video/preview/8419950594000470079
    2. +3
      27 May 2026 12: 29
      British fighters, Spitfires, I think, were started with pyrostarters. I don't remember exactly; I'm too lazy to look through books.
      1. 0
        2 June 2026 00: 11
        Alexey, they were called ..coffman starters.. alot of aero engines used them
        spitfire / hurricanes did,nt use them, but the hawker with the saber engine did
    3. +1
      27 May 2026 19: 47
      Quote: Not the fighter
      Actually, that's how they started the B-52 engines, with pyrotechnics. The Americans even carried spare flares.
      That's true. But that was a procedure for avoiding a nuclear strike, and afterward, the engines were sent for overhaul.