When Friends Are More Dangerous Than the Enemy: Rear Admiral Elphinstone's Actions from Arrival in the Archipelago to the Battle of Chesma

41 215 29
When Friends Are More Dangerous Than the Enemy: Rear Admiral Elphinstone's Actions from Arrival in the Archipelago to the Battle of Chesma

As I mentioned earlier, the Russian expedition's situation deteriorated significantly after the defeat of Barkov's detachment, as the Greeks were only willing to join the troops while they were victorious. The Minots gradually began to disperse: having plundered the area around Misitra, they, having made a considerable profit, retreated back to their mountains. However, by the arrival of Count A. G. Orlov, some troops still remained, which is why the decision was made to attempt to hold Navarino.

But this would have been completely impossible as long as the Turks held the city of Modon, located no more than 10 miles from Navarino. With such a fortified base, they could always amass troops there for an attack on the Russian-held city and port. Therefore, it was decided to take Modon. For this purpose, on April 18, a detachment of 500 Russian soldiers and 2000 Greeks set out from Navarino under the command of Prince Yury Dolgoruky, who had arrived with Orlov.

The idea was to strike suddenly, but the Ottomans, through Greek spies, knew of the detachment's movement and were ready to meet it. A proper siege had to be arranged, which required artillery: Count A. G. Orlov was then forced to dispatch S. K. Greig at the head of a small detachment consisting of his battleship "Three Hierarchs" and the newly acquired frigate "Saint Nicholas." On April 26, they approached the fortress and, after exchanging a couple of salvos, entered the port of Modon, landing their artillery ashore.

Prince Yu. V. Dolgoruky wasted no time preparing battery positions from the very first day he arrived before Modona. Consequently, everything was completed on April 28, and the cannonade began the following day. Until then, the Turks had observed the Russian preparations with complete indifference, but as soon as cannonballs began flying, they began responding quickly and effectively with artillery fire. But the careful placement of our batteries decided the matter: virtually all the Ottoman cannons were knocked out, and a breach in the fortifications was made by the morning of May 4.

However, the day before, Prince Yu. V. Dolgoruky learned that a large Turkish force under the command of the Chief Morean Pasha was marching to the relief of Modon. The Greco-Russian detachment, due to its small numbers, was unable to engage it in the open. However, this was not necessary, as the Russians and Greeks had the mountains themselves on their side. The Turkish army could only reach Modon through a narrow mountain defile (as this landmark is named in S. K. Greig's diary), which could easily be held by creating Thermopylae for the Ottomans. To this end, A. G. Orlov dispatched a strong Greek detachment to the "defile."

And he made a mistake by not assigning even a small number of Russian soldiers to it, which is why Thermopylae never happened. No one knows what really happened, but judging by what happened next, the Greeks simply fled upon seeing the Turks, and, of course, none of them thought to report this to the Russian camp. As a result, Yury Dolgorukov only learned that enemy troops were approaching on the morning of May 4, when there was almost no time left to organize a meeting.

The Turks split up, attacking the Russian camp, where 250 soldiers led by the prince attempted to hold off a Turkish force of 2500-3000. Naturally, they were unsuccessful, and Yuri Dolgorukov, twice wounded by rifle bullets, was forced to retreat to Navarin. Our forces, roughly the same size, were attacked on the outskirts of the city by at least 2000 Turks. Seeing this, they were joined by about 800 more garrison soldiers. Naturally, it was impossible to hold out, so this Russian detachment, abandoning its well-equipped batteries, was forced to retreat to join the remnants of Prince Yuri Dolgorukov's detachment.

This was the Russian Expeditionary Force's darkest hour. Of the 500 of our soldiers who reached Modon, 150 were killed and 250 wounded. Almost all the artillery deployed to destroy the Turkish fortress had to be abandoned, and it fell into the Turks' hands. I find it difficult to say how many guns there were in total, since S.K. Greig indicates that 30 guns were brought ashore—18 24-pounders and 12 12-pounders—but there were 13 guns in the batteries near the town itself, and those were definitely lost. Another six were deployed on an island near the town, so these guns were recovered, but what happened to the remaining eleven is unclear.

It was also good that the Turks were so happy to have captured the batteries that they did not pursue our retreating soldiers, otherwise we could have lost the entire detachment.

Good news


After the failure at Modon, the Russian base in Navarino was doomed. The Greeks had once again demonstrated their unreliability, and now, after yet another defeat, they were fleeing even faster than before. The small Russian ground forces had suffered heavy losses, so it was impossible to even dream of dislodging the thousands-strong Ottoman corps from Modon. Now all that remained was to accept the inevitable and consider what to do next.

It must be said that Count A. G. Orlov, despite everything, felt his responsibility to the Greeks. Those who took part in the uprising, after leaving fleet An unenviable fate awaited them, so the Count took measures to rescue them. Some of the Greeks were transported on three transport ships (pinks) to Port Mahon on Minorca, then under British control; others were taken to the islands of the Archipelago, where there were no Turks. Interestingly, Empress Catherine II later granted pensions to those Greeks who were forced to abandon their wealthy "fazendas" (farmsteads) commensurate with their contributions to the failed uprising.

But let's return to the Russian fleet's situation. After May 4, it was absolutely clear that Navarin could not be held, so G.A. Spiridov's squadron once again found itself without a permanent base. Then the Greeks reported that a large Ottoman fleet with twelve ships of the line was approaching the Morea, compared to only five for our admirals. Count A.G. Orlov was preparing to blow up the Navarin fortress and take to sea to engage the Turkish fleet, but then, in a long string of setbacks, a cause for celebration finally appeared.

On May 10, D. Elphinstone's squadron, consisting of three ships of the line, two frigates, a pinnace, and transports, arrived in Kolokynth Bay, located east of Cape Matapan in the Moray region. This was a very good thing, but the bad news was that this rear admiral of Scottish descent, instead of meeting with Count A.G. Orlov or at least receiving instructions from him, immediately upon arrival took matters into his own hands.


John Elphinstone

Almost immediately upon arrival, Elphinstone learned that the Turkish fleet was near Napoli di Romagna (today's Nafplion), and on May 12, a day after his arrival, he set out to search for it. This despite the fact that his squadron had just completed a long voyage from Portsmouth, after which Elphinstone hadn't stopped anywhere until the Morea. And so, without giving his ships time to recover, and with his forces clearly insufficient, he rushed into battle. One motive is apparent: Elphinstone was apparently seeking not only and not so much victory for the Russian expedition, but personal success, glory, and the laurels of a great naval commander.

Upon learning that Count A. G. Orlov's affairs were dire, he landed the soldiers he had brought with him at a place near Misitra and ordered a detachment to Navarin to his rescue. D. Elphinstone neglected to learn that this detachment would be unable to carry out this order, as the land routes to Navarin had been cut off, leaving the detachment itself in need of rescue. However, had Count A. G. Orlov not learned of this in time, the few land forces brought by D. Elphinstone would have been destroyed. Therefore, Count A. G. Orlov dispatched G. A. Spiridov with four ships of the line and a frigate with orders to pick up D. Elphinstone's detachment and only then join the newly arrived squadron to search for and destroy the Turkish fleet.

Actions of D. Elphinstone's squadron from 12 to 22 May 1770


D. Elphinstone set out to sea on May 12, and at 10:00 a.m. on May 16, after rounding Cape St. Angelo, he spotted two large ships to leeward. The position was favorable, and the rear admiral rushed to attack. The ships quickly closed in, as the Turks were sailing close-hauled (that is, against the wind). By around 3:00 p.m., the entire Turkish fleet had been sighted. Elphinstone's ships numbered 11 ships of the line, six caravels, and frigates, not counting galleys and other small vessels.

The Turkish fleet's numbers may have been somewhat exaggerated, but in any case, it was clearly and vastly superior to the Russian squadron. The Ottomans initially appeared determined to engage, their ships maneuvering to exit the bay, at the depths of which lay Napoli di Romagna. D. Elphinstone gave the signal for a general pursuit. The squadrons closed in: around 17:00 PM, the Russian 66-gun "Ne tron ​​menya" (Don't Touch Me) came within cannon shot of the lead Turkish ship, flying the flag of the Kapudan Pasha, or commander-in-chief of the Turkish fleet, and exchanged fire. "Ne tron ​​menya"'s sister ship, "Saratov," attacked the next Turkish battleship, which was seen flying the flag of a vice-admiral. The third to reach the Turks was the 32-gun frigate "Nadezhda." At the same time, D. Elphinstone, sailing on the most powerful battleship, the 72-gun (after refitting in England) Svyatoslav, and the second frigate, Africa, lagged behind and were unable to get within firing range of the Ottomans.

But three Russian ships were enough for the Turks: both admiral's ships showed no inclination to engage in a decisive battle and rushed back into the bay from which they had just emerged. Naturally, the entire Turkish fleet followed them, and they sailed there, accompanied by fire from the Ne tron ​​menya, Saratov, and Nadezhda.

It's hard to imagine what would have happened, but nature intervened. Suddenly, a near-dead calm descended, giving the Turks the advantage of rowboats while the Russian squadron did not. That's how the battle of May 16 ended. I don't know the Turkish losses, but ours lost one killed and six wounded on the "Ne ton menya" (Don't Touch Me); the other ships suffered no losses.

The Russian ships lay idle for the evening and all night, as calm alternated with light winds, making sailing impossible, and light winds with calms, and so on until the morning of May 17. During this time, the Turkish galleys towed their ships of the line into the bay where the city of Napoli di Romagna was located, first the ships closest to the Russians, and then all the others. But in the morning, a wind arose, albeit not particularly strong, and D. Elphinstone's squadron rushed in pursuit of the Turkish fleet maneuvering in the bay.

The Ottomans again refused to fight and fled to the city of Napoli di Romagna, approaching it by 14:00 PM. Here, the Turkish fleet dropped anchor, turned broadside (i.e., crosswind), and, protected by coastal batteries, prepared for battle.

Well, D. Elphinstone reformed his force into a battle line and by 15:00 PM attacked the Turkish fleet. But the rear admiral noticed that the wind was dying down again. Fearing a calm, D. Elphinstone ordered the Russians to turn away and leave the bay. Alas, this order could no longer be carried out: the sea became calm, and the Russian ships were carried by the current straight toward the Turkish line.

This was completely unnecessary, so the flagship "Svyatoslav" and "Saratov" dropped anchor and, turning broadside to the enemy, engaged them in artillery combat. However, the range was great, so no serious damage could be caused to either us or the Ottomans. Our ships fired firestones, which managed to set one of the Ottoman ships on fire, but the Turks managed to put it out.

At 17:00 PM, a light wind blew again, allowing the Svyatoslav to cut its cable and escape. The Saratov, anchored closer to the Turkish city, was unable to catch the wind and remained stationary. According to S.K. Greig's log, it was towed by rowboats, but where D. Elphinstone got them from is unclear. Most likely, his squadron included some small Greek vessels that hadn't reached his main force on May 16 but arrived on May 17.

Be that as it may, the Russian squadron retreated and regrouped at a distance. After some serious consideration, D. Elphinstone decided to refrain from further attacks. The reason, he claimed, was the disparity in forces between his and the Turkish squadrons, as well as the fact that he had no ships that could be converted into fireships (and what about the rowboats that, according to S.K. Greig, had pulled the Saratov out?). Perhaps D. Elphinstone's greatest fear was the calm, which had already nearly led him to disaster... As it was, the matter ended, one might say, with nothing: the Svyatoslav lost three men killed and two wounded, and the Ne tron ​​menya lost one killed and one wounded. The Turkish losses were unknown, but they had not suffered significant damage.


Napoli de Romagna from the sea, photograph circa 1880s

D. Elphinstone decided not to engage in further battle near Napoli di Romagna, but to wait for the Turks to put to sea. To this end, he retreated to the island of La Spezia, and simultaneously dispatched a light vessel with news to Count A. G. Orlov of what had happened there and a request for reinforcement of the squadron. All this was perfectly reasonable, but then D. Elphinstone committed another oddity: instead of remaining near La Spezia, he sailed for the island of Cerigo. This opened the way out of the Gulf of Nauplia, at the depths of which Napoli di Romagna was located, and the Ottoman fleet was able to leave unhindered.

Joining forces


Admiral G.A. Spiridov, having received the order, set sail on May 15, and by the 17th he was already there, taking over the detachment landed by D. Elphinstone. This took G.A. Spiridov two days, and then he was ready to search for the Scottish rear admiral, but unfortunately, a calm set in. Nevertheless, on May 20th, Elphinstone's envoy, Lieutenant Gololobov, arrived. Apparently, the small Greek vessel on which he had arrived was propelled by oars, making the calm unfazed. From him, G.A. Spiridov learned of D. Elphinstone's adventures and was ready to go to his aid.

The wind blew on May 21, and the following day, the ships of G. A. Spiridov and D. Elphinstone finally met off Cerigo Island. And now, with a combined force of seven ships of the line and three frigates, they set out to search for the Ottoman fleet.

The wind blew calmly all day on May 23, and the Russian squadrons moved very slowly. Only on May 24 did things improve, allowing G.A. Spiridov and D. Elphinstone to press on. Near the island of La Spezia, where D. Elphinstone had departed, they discovered the retreating Ottoman fleet.

The Turks heroically fled as fast as they could, and the Russian squadrons tried to catch up. D. Elphinstone's ships, which had been docked later than G.A. Spiridov's ships and were therefore less heavily fortified, pulled ahead. Matters were further complicated by G.A. Spiridov's reformation of his squadron into a battle line, which significantly delayed it. But D. Elphinstone was also unsuccessful: only the "Ne tron ​​menya" and "Saratova" managed to approach the Turks, but the distance was too great for effective cannon fire, so their exchange of fire with the five Ottoman rear ships was inconclusive.

The Russian squadrons pursued the Japanese fleet on May 24, 25, and 26, but to no avail; the Turks were slowly but surely breaking away. This was due to the Ottoman ships' extremely large lower sails and topsails, which were also very light, being made of cotton. The Turks knew the seas adjacent to Ottoman lands well and understood how best to navigate them, which is why they designed such sails, while the Russian sailors had no comparable ones. Therefore, by the evening of May 26, only the last six Ottoman ships were still visible, and to see them, one had to climb to the topsail. There was absolutely no chance of catching the Turkish fleet.

The admirals dispatched their representatives: G. A. Spiridov to Yura Island and D. Elphinstone to Siro to discover where the Turkish fleet might have gone. Returning to the squadron on May 28, the envoys reported that the Ottomans, having passed between the islands of Tino and Mikoni, had disappeared in an unknown direction, but that a large Turkish ship, accompanied by two galleys, had been seen in the Strait of Negropont.

Then D. Elphinstone informed G.A. Spiridov that he only had enough fresh water for two days and needed to refill at the port of Rafti. He also suggested that G.A. Spiridov provide him with ships with which he could hunt the Turkish ship and galleys he had spotted while his squadron refilled its water supplies. G.A. Spiridov did not object, but D. Elphinstone was unsuccessful: he found no Turkish vessels, and it was doubtful that any were there at all. So, on June 2, D. Elphinstone's and G.A. Spiridov's ships reassembled.

Since the pursuit of the Turks, the admirals had been at odds with each other, especially since D. Elphinstone was completely unwilling to acknowledge G.A. Spiridov as his commander. Meanwhile, Grigory Andreevich Spiridov, a full admiral, demanded subordination from a rear admiral, especially one who had only just received his rank. Clearly, such duality was unhelpful, so Fyodor Grigoryevich Orlov, who was present with the squadron, suggested they join forces with Count Alexei Grigoryevich Orlov. He was the commander of both, a position D. Elphinstone did not dispute. The admirals agreed, and so it was done.

About Turkish reasons


What was the Turkish fleet doing, constantly fleeing from a weaker but more determined enemy? The point is that the first principle of Ottoman commanders was: "Protect and take no risks!" A Turkish admiral repeatedly stated, "The Russians risk losing only their flag, while the Turks risk an entire part of their empire." Simply put, D. Elphinstone and G.A. Spiridov risked only their ships, but the destruction of the Turkish fleet undermined the coherence of the Ottoman lands. Without the Turks' fleet, communications with Egypt, Syria, and so on would have essentially been severed, and Ottoman power there wasn't particularly strong. Therefore, the Turks were more interested in preserving their ships than in winning, and their actions must be assessed in this context.

Scouts correctly reported to the Turkish command that the Russians had only five ships of the line and one frigate in the Morea. Therefore, Kapudan Pasha, with a fleet at least twice the size of the Russians, risked an offensive spirit and prepared to attack the Russians at Navarino. In fact, he left Napoli di Romagna with this goal in mind. Kapudan Pasha wisely assumed that the Russians had disembarked some of their crews and unloaded a number of naval guns, which would further increase his numerical superiority. Thus, the Greek scouts who reported to Count A. G. Orlov that a powerful Turkish fleet was approaching him were not at all untrue.

But then, out of the blue, D. Elphinstone appeared on the Kapudan Pasha's head. The Turkish admiral couldn't have imagined that he would be attacked by three battleships, and he assumed they were merely the vanguard, followed by G.A. Spiridov's main force. Fear, as the saying goes, has wide eyes, so he mistook D. Elphinstone's frigates and transports for battleships.

Naturally, observing so many Russian battleships with his own eyes, Kapudan Pasha fell into a slight panic. He suspected treason: it appeared that the spy reports that the Russians had only five battleships were completely false. So Kapudan Pasha assumed he was facing a far stronger enemy than he actually was, and just how strong was unclear. And since the Turkish admiral was determined to preserve his fleet at any cost, he fled from D. Elphinstone under the cover of the shore batteries.

Only there, near the city of Napoli di Romagna, did Kapudan Pasha realize he was being attacked by only three Russian battleships. Realizing what a fool he had been, the Turkish admiral yearned for revenge and, as soon as the wind permitted, set out to sea to find and punish the insolent D. Elphinstone. However, he now faced not only Elphinstone, but the combined forces of D. Elphinstone and G.A. Spiridov. And since engaging in battle without a numerical advantage was not in the Turkish commander's plans, he fled.

On the actions of D. Elphinstone


Of course, D. Elphinstone led the second Russian squadron to the Archipelago with almost no losses along the way, for which he deserves enormous credit. But his actions in the Archipelago, in my opinion, were completely inappropriate and surprisingly irresponsible.

I've already mentioned that D. Elphinstone appears to have been motivated solely by a desire to gain personal glory and distinguish himself in the eyes of Catherine II. As soon as he learned of the Turkish fleet's arrival, he rushed to intercept it, without giving his crews a rest or taking steps to join up with G.A. Spiridov's main forces. He chose to quickly dispose of the landing force on board, sending it "to the rescue" of Count A.G. Orlov, without any reconnaissance or intelligence, via Misitra, unaware that it had already been captured by Turkish troops. In effect, in his haste to secure the laurels of a great naval commander, D. Elphinstone sent the Russian troops to certain death.

And just like that, D. Elphinstone led the ships entrusted to his command to certain death. Had the Turkish commander not been captivated by his own fears and instead managed to grasp the situation, he, with the aforementioned advantage in sails, which gave his ships greater speed in light winds, and an overwhelming numerical superiority, would have had every opportunity to defeat and destroy the Russian squadron, paralyzed by the windless conditions.

Most likely, in this case, our fleet's first Archipelago expedition would have been a fiasco. And this isn't just because A.G. Orlov and G.A. Spiridov would have been short a third of the fleet they actually had in June 1770. These two would have been able to attack and destroy the Turkish fleet at Chesma with just six ships of the line instead of nine. However, the destruction of the entire Turkish fleet at Chesma was a result not only of the talent of our naval commanders and the courage of our sailors, but also of the completely passive role voluntarily adopted by the Turkish squadron. However, if the Turks had destroyed D. Elphinstone's detachment, they might have regained their spirits and attempted to take active action. In such a case, it's unlikely that G.A. Spiridov would have been able to defeat the Turkish fleet with just six ships of the line.

In general, in my opinion, the irresponsible actions of D. Elphinstone jeopardized the success of the first Archipelago expedition, and only by a happy coincidence and the timidity of the Turkish admiral did we not suffer defeat.

The above criticism, of course, in no way applies to the ship commanders, officers, and enlisted men of D. Elphinstone's squadron. They, in fact, demonstrated the highest valor and courage, furiously attacking the enemy at such an unfavorable odds, fought skillfully, and rightfully earned honor and glory.

Actions of Count A.G. Orlova


It may seem strange that Count A. G. Orlov did not dispatch the entire Russian squadron, or at least all the ships of the line, to join D. Elphinstone. However, it should be noted that the Rear Admiral's swift actions from Scotland required an immediate response—the landing force he had landed had to be rescued immediately, and the main forces of the Russian fleet had to be assembled into a single unit just as quickly.

But it was equally important not to abandon Navarino to its fate. The wounded had to be evacuated, the fortress and any guns that couldn't be loaded onto ships had to be prepared for demolition. The remaining troops on land had to be taken aboard. For all this, ships were needed, and there was also a psychological factor. While the fleet was moored in Navarino harbor, the Turks were wary of storming it, but if the fleet left, they might well decide to do so, potentially destroying the entire garrison there. Even so, with only two large ships remaining in the port—the battleship Three Hierarchs and the frigate Nadezhda Blagopoluchiya—large Turkish detachments were approaching Navarino, and the evacuation of the last troops had to be carried out by pulling the battleship ashore and under the cover of its guns.

Only on May 23 was the fortress blown up, the last Russian soldiers boarded the ships' decks, and Navarin was abandoned to the enemy. The Turks occupied it and, discovering three unexploded guns, began firing at the Three Hierarchs. The problem was that the wind was blowing directly from the sea, and the battleship, having covered the troops' retreat, was now unable to move away from the shore. The Turks fired, the Three Hierarchs responded, and the Turks abandoned their guns, only to return after a while and open fire again, so the cycle repeated itself.

The Ottomans failed to inflict serious damage on the battleship, and on May 27, Count A.G. Orlov's detachment set out to sea. The frigate Nadezhda Blagopoluchiya departed for Port Mahon, escorting transports carrying troops, while the Three Hierarchs headed in search of the fleet. On June 2, it was joined by the Rostislav, which had finally reached the Archipelago. Only on June 11 did Count A.G. Orlov and his two battleships finally join up with the squadrons of G.A. Spiridov and D. Elphinstone.

Well, the Morea operation failed, and the Russian expeditionary fleet lost its base. But the Turkish fleet had fled, and Count A. G. Orlov now had at his disposal a powerful squadron of nine battleships.

The decisive battle was approaching - all that was needed was to find the Ottoman fleet.

Продолжение следует ...
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    28 May 2026 05: 01
    Russian squadrons chased the Japanese fleet on May 24, 25, and 26, but to no avail.

    Typo. The rest is a breeze to read. good
    1. +4
      28 May 2026 07: 37
      Quote: Chifka
      Eyed

      This is according to Freud. laughing
      Quote: Chifka
      The rest is read in one breath

      Thank you!
      1. +3
        28 May 2026 09: 34
        Andrey, thank you for continuing the series!
        The apotheosis is near!!!
    2. 0
      28 May 2026 12: 19
      There's more.
      The small Greek vessel on which he arrived was rowed, so the calm was no problem for him.

      Since childhood, they hammered into me: "ON OARS, UNDER Sail"
      with my own eyes

      So eyes grew on your hands?!
      "Three Hierarchs" answered

      case agreement wink

      — Rate your level of tediousness on a scale of one to one hundred.
      — 87,234... No, 87,235.
      1. +7
        28 May 2026 12: 28
        Quote: Quzmi4
        Since childhood, they hammered into me: "ON OARS, UNDER Sail"

        You're right about that, my mistake, thank you. Sailing isn't my specialty, after all.
        Quote: Quzmi4
        So eyes grew on your hands?!

        The fact that "hand-made eyes" is in quotation marks suggests a joke.
        Quote: Quzmi4
        case agreement

        There are no errors with the cases. The ship was not called "Three Hierarchs", but rather "Three Hierarchs",
        1. +2
          28 May 2026 18: 45
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          sailing fleet is not my specialization

          It's not hard to "forgive" you, it's more difficult with the "sea wolf" Elfinstone:
          In the morning the wind rose, although not too strong, and D. Elphinstone's squadron rushed in pursuit

          a breeze from the land... even in complete calm it rises in the morning and quickly ends, which is known to "any wolf"

          At 17:00 a light wind blew again, so Svyatoslav, having cut the rope, was able to move away

          A sea breeze also happens "always" and doesn't last long... you have to hurry, and not wait for the weather to change :)

          P.S. Thank you! It's a pleasure to read, with lots of little-known details. We'll leave the minor specifics under the rug, please don't hold it against us :)
          1. +3
            28 May 2026 21: 36
            Thanks for the information, I'll keep that in mind :))
      2. +5
        28 May 2026 18: 05
        Quote: Quzmi4
        "Three Hierarchs" answered

        case agreement
        1. +1
          29 May 2026 18: 16
          "My fault, I'll make it right!"
          Enlightened, thank you.
  2. -4
    28 May 2026 09: 52
    The described failure of the plans to liberate the Morea from the Turks was entirely natural, since it was based on the gamble of the Orlov brothers, Grigory and Alexei, to create an independent Greek state, apparently with a claim to their own accession under the patronage of the Russian Empire. Thus, long before the war in 1763, Grigory Orlov, on his own initiative, sent emissaries to Greece—Manuel Saro, a Greek merchant from St. Petersburg, and Georgi Papazoli, an artillery lieutenant—to determine the Greeks' readiness for rebellion and establish contacts with their leaders. Alexei Orlov himself did the same after leaving for Venice in 1768. Count Nikita Panin, who directed the foreign policy of the Russian Empire, actively opposed these plans, reasonably believing that nothing good would come of it for either Russia or the Greeks. Ultimately, however, Grigory Orlov, as Catherine's favorite, pushed through this gamble. Ultimately, after the initial successes of the Russian landing force and the Greek militias, achieved thanks to the element of surprise, a series of continuous defeats began. The Turks, unsurprisingly, transferred local troops from Albania across the Isthmus of Corinth and drowned the uprising in blood, while the Russian landing force was driven back into the sea. However, this provided little help to Golitsyn's forces at Khotyn, as it did nothing to delay or prevent the dispatch of a 200-strong Turkish army across the Danube to the Polish border, which Golitsyn defended. The failure of the Turkish offensive against Poland to aid the Poles in their war against Russia is entirely due to Golitsyn, who skillfully waged an active defense, preventing the Turks from crossing the Dniester at Khotyn and blocking their supply routes. It also owed a great deal to the complete incompetence of the Turkish commander-in-chief, Grand Vizier Mehmed Emin Pasha, who failed to supply the 200-strong Turkish army in Moldavia to such an extent that massive losses of personnel and cavalry from starvation began, leading to mass mutinies and desertions. The Turkish army lost more than half its strength to desertion, and due to a lack of supplies, it was unable to advance in full force against Golitsyn in Poland or Rumyantsev in Novorossiya. Instead, it sent only small detachments, which were routed by our forces. Ultimately, the Turks were forced to abandon not only Khotyn but also all of Moldavia and Wallachia without a decisive battle, which by the end of 1769 were occupied by our troops, with the exception of a number of fortresses. For this, Mehmed Emin Pasha was removed from office and executed, accused of disorganizing the army. And the torrents of Greek blood shed were completely in vain; they had no effect on the situation.
    The Russian fleet's actions in the Aegean Sea and the blockade of the Dardanelles and Constantinople could, conversely, have hastened Turkey's exit from the war, so this objective of the expedition should have been a priority from the outset. The Russian fleet could have initially assembled at Port Mahon, Minorca, for example, and then moved into the Aegean Sea in full force, with the goal of seizing a convenient operational base inaccessible to Turkish ground forces on an Aegean island. This would then support subsequent operations to destroy the Turkish fleet and establish a complete and long-term naval blockade of Constantinople, which would have quickly eliminated Turkey from the war. But as we shall see, Alexei Orlov would fail even in this task, despite the destruction of the Turkish fleet at Chesma.
  3. BAI
    +3
    28 May 2026 10: 20
    Rowing vessels, but where D. Elphinstone got them from is unclear. Most likely, his squadron included some small Greek vessels that didn't reach his main forces on May 16 but arrived on May 17.

    The rowing boats were actually boats from ships. Even during the Crimean War, they towed sailing ships. At least the frigate Flora certainly did.
    1. +1
      28 May 2026 18: 16
      Quote: BAI
      The ships' boats served as rowing vessels. Even during the Crimean War, they were used to haul

      I just got here... you took the words right out of my mouth :)
      But why did they only "drag" to the Crimean one?.. On any battleship or frigate there were always a couple of boats (not counting the captain's) to "drag" when there was no wind or the ship was damaged
      P.S. Of course, they are no good fire ships, to put it mildly.
  4. +6
    28 May 2026 10: 39
    When speaking of Elphinstone, it is impossible not to recall the sacramental:
    "...Having sighted the enemy near Spetso Island after the noon bell, the Rear Admiral ordered the drums to be beaten and the topmast flags raised, especially the blue, or vanguard, flag. We prepared for battle and began to lean northward, in order to cut off the enemy's bow. The ship's commander respectfully reminded the Rear Admiral that the enemy was three times as numerous as we were, and that we should avoid any confusion. The Rear Admiral deigned to reply that such enemies should not be counted, but rather f*cked, "He ordered that an entry be made in the quarterdeck log." (Entry from the quarterdeck log of the battleship Svyatoslav).
    He was a fighter. Although our historical tradition tends to portray Elphinstone as some kind of quarrelsome, incompetent fool (or even a spy), this seems rather pretentious.
    1. +5
      28 May 2026 10: 56
      Quote: Ryazanets87
      The Rear Admiral deigned to reply that such enemies should not be counted, but rather destroyed, and ordered that an entry be made in the ship's log.

      That is, he documented his exploits. Which really works for the image.
  5. +3
    28 May 2026 11: 03
    Russian squadrons drove away the Japanese fleet and on May 24, and 25, and 26, but to no avail, the Turks slowly but surely broke away from them.
    If only this were true. laughing good It's clear that it's a typo.
    1. +3
      28 May 2026 11: 21
      Quote: Fitter65
      If only this were true.

      As I wrote above, it was a Freudian slip. laughing Well, I don't like the Japanese navy. laughing
      1. +4
        28 May 2026 14: 07
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        Well, I don't like the Japanese navy.

        And who in Russia likes it, especially in the Far East? It's not Japanese automaking. laughing
  6. +2
    28 May 2026 14: 59
    I admire Admiral Elphinstone's performance because I'm a forward by nature, even though I played hockey and handball in goal as a child. As for football, even as a defender, I was always racing toward the opposing goal and scoring many goals. The English generally had a sporting spirit at sea and always sought to attack, regardless of the enemy's numbers.
  7. -2
    28 May 2026 20: 14
    "Therefore, the Turks really wanted not so much to win, but to save their ships, and it is in this context that their actions must be assessed."

    This is a highly questionable assertion; by this logic, the Turks should have withdrawn their ships to the Sea of ​​Marmara, under the protection of coastal batteries in the Dardanelles, as they did in 1807, saving their ships from the British squadron of Admiral Duckworth.
    1. +1
      28 May 2026 21: 36
      Quote: denis.76
      This is a highly questionable statement; by this logic, the Turks should have withdrawn their ships to the Sea of ​​Marmara, under the protection of coastal batteries in the Dardanelles.

      Which one? This one? I'm writing about how the Turks were ready to fight, but at the same time, they considered it crucial to preserve their ships. Were the Turks ready to fight the British at sea? No? Then what "this logic" are we talking about?
      1. -1
        29 May 2026 09: 26
        Okay, let's assume, by your logic, that the Turks were only prepared to fight with a two-to-one superiority in ships of the line. And they sent 10 against 5, so why did they retreat when they encountered only 3? Let's say they mistook them for a vanguard, but that didn't give them reason to believe there were more than 5 ships of the line. Or they mistook Elphinstone's two frigates for ships of the line, but that would again leave them with 5 ships of the line, which, by your logic, they were initially planning to confront. The assumption that Elphinstone deployed transport ships in the battle line is very strange and unsupported by sources. Perhaps we should simply accept the obvious: the Turks had a complete breakdown in the military organization of both their land and naval forces, that their archaic system of naval command and organization was stuck in the 17th century and could not withstand European military organization with its precision and discipline. Therefore, their enormous armies and fleets fled and were routed by the vastly smaller forces of the European powers.
        1. 0
          29 May 2026 10: 20
          Quote: denis.76
          And they sent 10 against 5, why then, having met only 3, did they retreat?

          This is described in the article. Have you read it?
          Quote: denis.76
          The assumption that Elphinstone placed transport ships in the battle line is very strange and not confirmed by sources.

          This is your assumption. I don’t have one.
          Quote: denis.76
          Maybe we should just accept the obvious.

          The Turks mistook not only the frigates for battleships, but also Elphinstone's transport ships, which were located at a distance and not in any combat formation. How come the Russian battleships had more than 5?
          Quote: denis.76
          Let's say they took them for the vanguard, but this did not give them any reason to think that there were more than 5 battleships

          So, there are 3 in the vanguard, and one each in the corps de battalion and rearguard, right?
          The Turks didn't have such a rich imagination as you:)))))
          1. -2
            29 May 2026 11: 28
            It's just unclear how, under these circumstances, the Turks managed to sail from Constantinople to the Peloponnese, if all the ships they encountered seemed to them to be Russian battleships. They looked like truly heroic people.
            1. 0
              29 May 2026 11: 59
              Quote: denis.76
              It’s just unclear how, under such circumstances, the Turks even managed to sail from Constantinople to the Peloponnese.

              So study history and everything will become clear.
  8. +1
    29 May 2026 09: 44
    The Turks were hostages to their own gigantomania not only at sea but also on land. Why send 200 soldiers north without the ability to feed them properly? At that time, supplies only allowed for corps of 30-40 soldiers to fight. Russia had an army of 315 in 1812, but fielded only 135 against Napoleon because there were no railways yet, and supplies were carried by carts on a smaller scale. The Turkish fleet was enormous for its time, but this negatively impacted its combat effectiveness due to poor nutrition and low morale, as many sailors were recruited from conquered peoples who had no desire to fight.
    1. -1
      29 May 2026 11: 00
      Indeed, moving an army of 200 in the 18th century was a nearly impossible task, even for a long time, even in parts. It's simply difficult to imagine today, given modern transportation capabilities and the ability to produce and transport food. The population of Moscow, the largest city in Russia in the 18th century, was only 250, while Constantinople exceeded 500, and feeding it was always one of the Ottoman Empire's main challenges. Therefore, a naval blockade of food supplies from the Mediterranean could have caused famine and led to the fall of any sultan.
      But the Turks had no choice; they could only defeat European armies with a massive numerical superiority, and then only for a limited time. They lacked linear tactics, and in fact, lacked infantry of the quality possessed by the European powers. To put it simply, their army was like the Janissaries (streltsy) and cavalry (landed cavalry) of 17th-century Russia. They had no officer corps or regulations, relying on crowd control with melee weapons, and using firearms exclusively in defense, and even then without coordinated volley fire—in other words, almost no effect. Therefore, a single European regiment of 1,000 men with four light 3-pounder guns fired approximately 50,000 musket balls and 10,000 large-caliber canister shots over 20 mm per hour, which, with a hit rate of around 20%, resulted in 12,000 enemy killed and wounded. In reality, of course, no one could withstand a full hour of fire and suffered such losses, but this gives an idea of ​​the kind of mincemeat the European line infantry made out of Turkish armed crowds, and therefore, without a 10 to 1 ratio, there was no point in the Turks going at all.
      1. 0
        29 May 2026 11: 03
        Quote: denis.76
        Yes, moving an army of 200 thousand in the 18th century is an almost impossible task, even for a long time, even in parts.

        And how did Napoleon cope...
        1. -2
          29 May 2026 11: 23
          Well, it was already in the 19th century, to be precise, and in 1812 I didn’t quite manage it, but you have your own “logic”, you know better.
          1. 0
            29 May 2026 12: 00
            Quote: denis.76
            Well, it was already in the 19th century, to be precise.

            Yeah. And the early 19th century was completely different from the late 18th. Napoleon probably transported his Grande Armée in airships, or maybe even on commuter trains...