The Season of Quiet Refusals, or Twelve Chairs in a Deputy's Office

9 601 38
The Season of Quiet Refusals, or Twelve Chairs in a Deputy's Office


On May 8th, in the city of N, where all sorts of stupidity grows faster than potatoes in a collective farm field, Comrade Yakushin, Secretary of the Main Council of the "Sobornoe Otechestvo" (Cathedral Fatherland) Party, became publicly angry. He was angry over the latest initiative—the introduction of a state standard for photographing newborn babies.



"It's sheer stupidity," Comrade Yakushin said into the microphone, pushing it away with his hand as if it were his fault. "An attempt to prevent people from living the way they're accustomed to."

Comrade Yakushin did not specify whose stupidity exactly. In our country, stupidity can be anonymous, like a sacrifice, or collective, like responsibility.

Chapter I. Individual Comrades


There were four months left until the elections to the High Assembly. In that time, according to the calculations of experienced bureaucrats, one could forget everything except one's salary. And so, in the orderly ranks of the "Cathedral Fatherland," who had voted as one finger on one hand for blocking correspondence, disconnecting communications, and isolating domestic airwaves from the global airwaves, suddenly a new phenomenon emerged. individual deputies.

Individual deputies are a remarkable phenomenon of nature, akin to the spontaneous generation of mice in dirty laundry, as described by medieval scholars. For the time being, they remain invisible. They vote unanimously, applaud in unison, and dine in the same cafeteria. But let a fresh breeze of sociology blow, and they suddenly stand out from the crowd. separate, from which the party must urgently distance itself, as from a drunken fellow traveler in a reserved seat carriage.

"This is the first time I've seen him, Mr. Chief," the party says, glancing sideways at its own deputy. "He voted that way himself. He's an ideological man, you see. A bit of a twist."

And the deputy stands nearby and nods, because the instructions say to nod. This is how, in the old bureaucratic tradition, they "passed it on to the executors": the decision remained, the authorship evaporated like cologne from an accountant's cheek, and in its place was revealed the humble Comrade Perepyolkin, who throughout his life conscientiously bent exactly as much as he was ordered from above.

Chapter II. Very Carefully


In April, on the eve of regional trips, the deputies of the "Sobornoy Fatherland" party received two documents from the central office.

The first document recommended discussing the topic of restrictions in communications very carefullyDon't take responsibility, don't defend the restrictions, insist that all this is temporary—like the New Economic Policy, like a three-day stubble, like a deputy's promise to repair a road.

The second document was called "A Dozen Tricky Questions" and instructed the same deputies to respond to citizens by claiming that blocking was a necessary measure in the context of an information-psychological war waged by the enemy with particular cunning against our pensioners.


Having received both documents, Deputy Polupanov sat down at the table, spread the papers on either side of the decanter, and considered. On the left was the instruction to justify. On the right, the instruction not to voice. In the middle stood the decanter, and in it was Polupanov himself, also in duplicate.

"It's not a contradiction," Polupanov said to the countess. "It's a division of labor."

The decanter remained silent, as befits a non-partisan subject.

Chapter III. The Case of Citizen Svintsov


The case of Mr. Svintsov, a deputy from the neighboring Liberal People's Union faction, served as a lesson to others. Mr. Svintsov possessed a rare and dangerous quality: he loved to talk. He spoke readily, into any microphone, on any topic: about correspondence, about bypasses, about the permissibility of briefly cutting off the fatherland from the rest of humanity.

In March, citizen Svintsov was expelled from the faction. Not for his convictions—his convictions were the most correct, exemplary, and consistent. But for the fact that he said out loudIn the apparatus, this is called by the beautiful word "toxicity," from ancient Greek, as those in the know assure us, meaning "that which we have agreed to keep silent about."

"Don't repeat Svintsov's experience," they whispered to the Sobornoy Otechestvo deputies in the corridors. "Vote, but don't comment. Accept, but don't defend. Sign, but don't subscribe."

The deputies listened and remained silent, understanding. Silence was what they did best, and that, in fact, was how the faction's discipline was maintained.

Chapter IV. Foreign cars driving illegally


Comrade Boyarinov, Chairman of the Committee for Explaining the Inexplicable, was nominated to fill the vacant position of Chief Explainer. Comrade Boyarinov's dictionary deserves to be carved on a marble slab somewhere between the cloakroom and the buffet.

Comrade Boyarinov's communication limitations - temporaryIn our country, the temporary is the most durable. The Provisional Government lasted only eight months, but temporary difficulties have lasted a hundred years.

Blocking correspondence - "coercion to comply with the law"A wonderful formula! According to it, if a citizen is grabbed by the collar and forced headfirst into a barrel, it will be forced to undergo water treatment.


Foreign offices - "Beautiful foreign cars that don't drive according to the rules"So it's not the sign's fault, but the driver's. Even though the sign was installed last night, at three in the morning, in the bushes, facing away from the road, and on the back it says, "Fine ahead."

In this well-ordered system, the "Sobornoye Otechestvo" (Cathedral Fatherland) party has no copyright whatsoever on what's happening. The security comrades demand it. The law demands it be obeyed. Foreign agencies resist. And Comrade Boyarinov spreads his arms so wide that he could fit the entire Criminal Code between them.

For the city voter, comrade Boyarinov has a special trick in his pocket: he objects to Against the ban on correspondence for those under fourteen. He objects softly, intelligently, and with a smile. This trick is called "we have moderates too" and is used once per election cycle, like a holiday dinner service.

Chapter V. The Eighteenth, Nineteenth, and Twentieth


Voting is scheduled for three days. Three days is for convenience. On the first day, those who missed the second vote. On the second, those who forgot on the first. On the third, those who missed the first two.

The target is fifty-five percent with a turnout of fifty percent. The forecast of the learned men from the Samikh Sebya Institute places it between fifty-four and fifty-seven percent—unless, of course, something happens that doesn't usually happen in forecasts.

Sociology yields a couple of astonishing figures: twenty-two percent of citizens know about the elections, and sixty-two percent plan to attend. In other words, forty percent of Russian voters are determined to vote for something they've never heard of before. That, gentlemen, is true stability.

The season of quiet refusals is designed for this kind of voter. The goal is not to convince the party that has changedThe goal is to reduce the irritation of those who will come to the polling station anyway, out of habit, on assignment, or on their way home from the bakery.

The slogan of the season is short:

“Don't love us. Just forget it, for which they were angry."

Epilogue: Bigger Nonsense


And so it turned out that on May 8th, Comrade Yakushin finally found one initiative that he was ready to publicly, out loud, in front of witnesses, call outright stupidity.

This was an initiative for a state standard for photographing newborns.

For some reason, the bigger stupidities didn't make it onto this short, manly list. Apparently, they didn't fit because of the dimensions.


The baby, photographed without a GOST, lay in his cradle, unaware that, thanks to him, a political party had just recovered from its own four-year voting cycle. He had everything ahead of him, including a quiet, very cautious season of quiet refusals, which, by the time he came of age, would, of course, become... temporary.

Like everything else in our country.

Composed by a correspondent at the buffet
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    24 May 2026 07: 19
    I can clearly see all the behind-the-scenes games of these deputies from a well-known party...for some reason they think that everything they do within their party for themselves and for the people outside of themselves is not visible to anyone else.
    You are deeply mistaken, gentlemen-comrades...very deeply.
    Don't violate the Russian Constitution...don't interfere in the personal lives of citizens, don't irritate them with your stupidity, and you will be happy.
    1. + 14
      24 May 2026 07: 44
      Everyone sees everything, everyone understands everything. But the voting will go as the authorities want. And it's not even about falsification. Sometimes you have to talk to people – the answer is: who should you vote for? Do you want it like in the 90s? Who else besides Putin? When I ask who to run to if he disappears, Lukashenko or Comrade Inu, they look at you like you're an idiot. I don't see any intrigue. It will be as it was.
      1. + 14
        24 May 2026 08: 57
        Quote: Lykases1
        But the vote will proceed as the authorities desire. And it's not even a matter of fraud.

        The fact is that under our authoritarian system, the government is engaged in an imitation of democracy. "All the basic institutions of democracy (parliament, courts, media) are built into the "vertical of power." They function as decoration (props), legitimizing the decisions of the executive branch."
      2. +6
        24 May 2026 09: 40
        As it was, so it will be.
        After reading your words, I decided to talk to the AI. This is what it told me.
        Resource advantages (Why they win) Recognition: The incumbent politician is constantly in the media. Voters don't need to be told who they are. Administrative resources: Access to state media, budget projects, and the ability to demonstrate work results (opening roads, schools) right before voting. Funding: Sponsors are more willing to invest in someone who already has real power and clear levers of influence. Voter psychology (Why they choose) Availability heuristic: The human brain tends to choose familiar options to save energy on analyzing new candidates. Demand for stability: When voting for an established figure, people often choose the lesser of two evils based on the principle "even though we criticize them, we know what to expect from them." New faces frighten voters with uncertainty. Political apathy: Due to the feeling that "everything is decided in advance," only loyal voters often turn out to vote, which automatically extends the mandate of the incumbent government.
        Historical Consequences (What It Leads To) If the same people remain in power for decades, the system inevitably faces political risks: Stagnation: The system loses flexibility, new ideas are not accepted, and social mobility for young people is blocked. Declining Legitimacy: Voters stop believing in elections themselves as an instrument of change.
      3. BAI
        +2
        24 May 2026 10: 21
        Who else but Putin?

        But really, who? He's cleared the political field; there are no competitors.
        There is one problem - there is no one to pass on power by inheritance.
      4. + 10
        24 May 2026 12: 56
        Quote: Lykases1
        and who should I vote for?
        For the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. Not because they're good and pro-people, but to screw over United Russia. There's a catch, though: Pikabu conspired to vote for the Communist Party, and now the provincial authorities are putting every possible pressure on Communist Party candidates.
        Quote: Lykases1
        Do you want it like in the 90s?
        Don't scare us: we did it once, and if we have to, we'll do it again. And remind us that in the 90s, bribe-takers didn't get rich; they rode to the woods in the trunk of a car, because there was no point in greedy greed. Especially since the 90s will be much shorter: back then, a lot of people still had all sorts of humanistic delusions from the Soviet era. Those are gone now, so the bandits will quickly disappear.
        Quote: Lykases1
        Who else but Putin?
        Yes, every second person in the country. This question made sense in 2007, but now...
        Quote: Lykases1
        And, it’s not even a matter of falsification.
        It is in her.
      5. 0
        26 May 2026 15: 38
        Gumilev has a theory of ethnogenesis. According to this concept, people can be roughly divided into:
        Passionaries - leaders and changers who are capable of changing the world around them.
        Harmonious personalities - people who adapt to the environment and ensure the stability of society.
        Subpassionaries - individuals who avoid active actions and adapt to circumstances.
        The first ones make up only 3-5% of the total population.
        The second 10-15%
        The third group, those who live by the principle “let the horse think - it has a big head” make up 80-85%.
        So the election results are unsurprising. And let's not forget about administrative resources. Plus ballot stuffing in batches, even under cameras. Plus remote internet voting (you can manipulate it as much as you want, up to the notorious 146%). Plus electronic ballot boxes, which can be configured to count positively for a particular candidate.
        And the icing on the cake are Putin's words, falsely attributing to Stalin the phrase, "It doesn't matter who you vote for. What matters is who you count for."
        Many researchers today agree that the phrase about voting and counting originated with Stalin's former secretary, Boris Bazhanov, who fled the Soviet Union for the West in the late 20s. His memoirs cite the following "Stalinist" words: "...I believe that it is completely unimportant who votes in the party and how; what is extremely important is who counts the votes and how."(C)
        To believe a fugitive traitor and attribute his lies to a truly great man, voicing these lies to the entire country, is, you know, beyond all bounds... A vivid characterization of Putin, his power, his pocket party, and his pocket "most honest elections"...
    2. +4
      24 May 2026 08: 27
      We've been through this somewhere before - And the impossible is possible, the long road is easy.
      What to do? Dry the crackers!
      You pododayut, but you do not steal!
      What a dreamer you are, my friend, this wouldn't happen even in a modern fairy tale.
    3. +8
      24 May 2026 09: 49
      Well, you know, sometimes it's really, really bad. Recently, there was a trial of a grandmother who was a terrorist. She's 71 years old, and they gave her nine. I wonder how much they'll give Tim Ivanov?
      I suppose if anyone were to discuss this terrorist here, they'd throw mud at her, saying she's gone mad in her old age. And she probably has, because her only crime was believing that the Soviet Union was alive. And that's undermining those foundations.
    4. +1
      24 May 2026 11: 27
      Let me ask you, what will happen if they interfere? What will you and the citizens do to them for this?
    5. 0
      24 May 2026 19: 57
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      You are deeply mistaken, gentlemen-comrades...very deeply.

      From what?
      "Vote with your heart!"
      Already passed.
      "We can do it again!"
  2. +7
    24 May 2026 07: 27
    It may seem funny, but in reality it’s all sad and unfortunately we can’t resist it yet, and those in power will do everything to ensure that we will never be able to resist it.
    1. 0
      24 May 2026 08: 13
      Quote: Dimy4
      It may seem funny, but in reality it’s all sad and unfortunately we can’t resist it yet, and those in power will do everything to ensure that we will never be able to resist it.

      How exactly said!
      Briefly - but everything is in its place!
      + + + + good
    2. +1
      24 May 2026 12: 58
      Quote: Dimy4
      It may seem funny, but in reality it’s all sad and unfortunately we can’t resist it yet, and those in power will do everything to ensure that we will never be able to resist it.
      The king thought so too.
  3. +7
    24 May 2026 07: 32
    Democracy is another lie perpetrated by the USSR's enemies; they will never hand over power to a genuine opposition in elections. But what they call democracy is that some of them allow their people to replace some of their leaders with others through elections.
    And it’s funny that some enemies of the USSR, led by the permanent “leader,” demand that other enemies of the USSR hold presidential elections, because they admit that those enemies of the USSR allow their people to replace some of them in power with others at elections.
  4. +2
    24 May 2026 07: 53
    Quote: Lykases1
    As it was, so it will be.

    Do not give up. smile
    When a country lacks sustainable political competition...when progressive youth fail to replace the old politicians, the foundation of the state begins to crumble...ultimately, it will inevitably collapse under the weight of internal and external contradictions...this has happened at least twice in Russian history...a new state is reborn from its ruins...like a phoenix from the ashes.
    For some reason, our society is going down this path for the third time... the signs of this are clearly visible.
    1. -2
      24 May 2026 08: 42
      Question: How exactly will you get out from under the rubble? The Ministry of Emergency Situations will no longer exist; it will collapse, too.
      1. +1
        24 May 2026 09: 17
        Quote: Not the fighter
        Question: How exactly will you get out from under the rubble? The Ministry of Emergency Situations will no longer exist; it will collapse, too.

        No way...if the debris crushes my limbs I'll die in a couple of hours, from dehydration in a couple of days, I can last a week without food...it's better, of course, to die right away so as not to suffer before death...well, it depends on your luck. request
        I watched all this from videos from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries where war was a roller.
        And in 2014, after the fighting in Luhansk and Donetsk, there were plenty of such videos. request
  5. + 10
    24 May 2026 07: 57
    How beautifully the "Eat Russia" activity is described
  6. -16
    24 May 2026 08: 21
    Military Review has quietly turned into a political dump. Not turning, but it has. First, there was a massive influx of cynics of all stripes, starting with the cautious and essentially true "they're not fools there either" and ending with "we're all incompetent and cowardly, not to mention thieves and window-dressers, unlike theirs." And some might argue with my conclusions, but the litmus test is the comments mentioning Banderovites, which are getting a ton of downvotes for it. Then, 99% of the comments under every news story, even historical ones, are dissatisfied with the government. I understand everything, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but how this correlates with the Japanese battleship being discussed during World War I is beyond me. Then came the hate articles about the persistent internet outages, etc. And now we have outright political propaganda disguised as the humor of a "correspondent" from under the buffet. And by the way, the website "Reporter," which was openly promoted here, judging by its design, belongs to the same company as VO, and even in the "quiet" years, its content and audience were far from patriotically oriented, to put it mildly. And yes, if anyone believes in the sincerity of the "correspondents" here and elsewhere, don't be naive. I can't say more; anyone smart enough will figure it out.
    1. +4
      24 May 2026 09: 56
      The enemies of the USSR, with the "freedom of speech" given to you by Gorbachev, have proven that you fiercely hate dissent even among each other, you fiercely hate the truth, especially about yourselves, about what you have done, and you really love to "hang labels" on those you are against.
      And, as a result of your evil, aggressive mentality, you rush to fiercely hate everyone against whom the anti-Soviet government sets you
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +6
      24 May 2026 13: 00
      Quote: MetalDesign
      But the litmus test is the comments that mention Banderovites and receive a bunch of downvotes for it.
      Amazing! People don't like being treated like idiots!
      Quote: MetalDesign
      Even 99% of the comments dissatisfied with the government are historical in nature. I understand that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but I don't understand how this correlates with the Japanese battleship under discussion from World War I.
      The coincidences are really unpleasant.
      Quote: MetalDesign
      I can’t write more, a smart person will understand it himself.
      We'll understand, don't worry.
  7. 0
    24 May 2026 08: 33
    Quote: MetalDesign
    I can't write more,

    smile Nothing new...elections are coming...
  8. -3
    24 May 2026 09: 52
    I've already written and will write again a clever thought that is being fiercely downvoted here, meaning they don't want to accept the obvious, probably hoping for something else. It's not my idea, but weighing various streams of information and experience, I completely agree with it. The current state of affairs, which some call "the system," will not change from within. The higher-ups won't allow anything to change; that's not what the system was built for. Internal forces are being suppressed, from endless restrictions to the guards; only an external force can bring down the system! But the higher-ups don't know how to combat this, which is why they've stalled in decision-making. Europe is preparing for a major war with us; everyone knows this, but no one knows what to do about it; that's not what they're built for. When there's an invasion, that's when the changes will happen.
    1. K_4
      +4
      24 May 2026 10: 35
      There won't be any changes even then. The country will simply be surrendered immediately; at the first sign of intervention, a horde of business jets will rush abroad, each in their own direction. Those who remain will play it safe and prepare bread and salt for their dear friends, while, of course, shouting patriotism from their television screens. Only isolated units, where the commanders' word of honor is not yet a curse word, and hastily assembled militia groups will resist. And even that's not a given. If the invaders come peacefully, without any major purges, etc., simply changing flags and installing their own people in power, then there won't be much resistance; the people are so fed up with the current government, believe me.
      1. -5
        24 May 2026 10: 41
        It's ridiculous. By your flawed logic, the war with Bandera's UkrOreikh should have ended back in '22; the people there had been fed up with the regime for about thirty years, and it was getting progressively worse every year.
        1. K_4
          +4
          24 May 2026 10: 54
          No, it shouldn't have been, because the bet was on a quick takeover—or rather, not even a takeover, but a blunt agreement. Essentially, the beginning of the SVO was simply a show for the West, and it was supposed to end with peace, friendship, and a demonstrative transition of Ukraine to full Russian patronage. I think everything was agreed upon beforehand. But why Zelenskyy decided to buck up is the question.
          Now the situation is completely different and requires serious (adult) decisions, especially in terms of curbing the greed of our capitalists and monopolies and trampling on their interests, but our government isn't ready for this. The result is zugzwang. If you act in Russia's interests, you'll harm the interests of capital and some important people in power. If you don't, you'll face popular discontent. So the government has stalled, preferring a policy of "let it all go away." But that's not working anymore.
          1. +4
            24 May 2026 12: 58
            It's an old trick. When Nicholas I decided to fight Turkey, he went to the English king, saying, "Hey, cousin, we're Christians, so how long?" He nodded in agreement and offered hope. But when the war truly and victoriously began for us, Great Britain and France declared war on us, even bringing in Austria-Hungary, which we had just saved from collapse, to join their side.
            In 90, the Americans, seeing the futility of Saddam's efforts to wrest oil-rich territories from a rebellious Iran, encouraged him by hinting that they wouldn't object to bringing the Emirate of Kuwait, a highly disputed territory inherited from the British, back to their home port. Saddam succumbed to the Greeks, unaware that in this scheme, he wasn't the dinner partner, but the meal.
        2. +1
          25 May 2026 16: 42
          I don't understand why you are being downvoted, but the one "who keeps the EU flag in his stash" is getting upvoted!?
          Or is everything really that bad in our country?
          We love our Motherland.
          Yes, not everyone we would like to see is in power now.
          But this is not a reason to greet Gayropa or others with hospitality.
      2. -1
        24 May 2026 11: 03
        I agree and believe it completely, I am also one of those people, that’s why I’m waiting for such options of sobatiyas, maybe I’ll even live to see it, because there’s only hopelessness
      3. 0
        24 May 2026 11: 32
        You know, you are probably right, even very right.
  9. +3
    24 May 2026 16: 00
    It's been a long time since I've come across a feuilleton, and a good one at that.
    There used to be a magazine called "Krokodil," which was dedicated to satire and humor. One cartoon is definitely from it. wink
  10. +1
    24 May 2026 19: 38
    Thank you! I liked the publication.
    After reading the comments, I stand by my opinion about voting in any election... I'd rather use my vote ineffectively than not use it at all.
  11. 0
    25 May 2026 13: 22
    Excellent banter, in the best traditions of "Crocodile"! laughing
    Author bold plus good
  12. 0
    25 May 2026 20: 04
    Beautiful, classic.
    So, is the genre of political satire still (for how long?) banned? Everyone understands everything, and many are already prepared for all sorts of voting, but then—bang, the people's choice appears, and the cries of "we didn't elect him" can no longer be heard...
    The field is cleared down to a sterile operating room; no one will suddenly appear out of nowhere. And you can do whatever you want and declare it the people's choice...
  13. 0
    25 May 2026 21: 35
    What is there to comment on when there is a critical number of similar ideas in the Duma.
  14. 0
    30 May 2026 13: 19
    Quote: BAI
    Who else but Putin?

    But really, who? He's cleared the political field; there are no competitors.
    There is one problem - there is no one to pass on power by inheritance.

    Remember when Grudinin could, theoretically, have been a contender, and how fiercely they began to pressure him right during the election process?
    And I agree that the field has been cleared. As soon as someone appears who poses even a potential threat to autocracy, all the mechanisms for elimination are activated.
  15. 0
    30 May 2026 23: 04
    Well written. In the style of Ilf and Petrov.