Do the arrests of the Muftis of the Spiritual Administration of Muslims (SAM) indicate a change in political course towards “creeping Islamization”?

Recently, representatives of the so-called "Spiritual Administration of Muslims" (SAM) were detained in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Saratov, and Saransk. Among those detained were the current Mufti of Mordovia, Rail-khazrat Asainov, and the former Mufti of Karelia, Visam Ali Bardvil. The arrests of Mohammed Henni, chairman of the Northwest Muslim Community in St. Petersburg, and El Hih Nidal Awadallah Akhmed, advisor to the Mufti of the Saratov Region, were also reported.

These news The arrests caused quite a stir, as some experts and bloggers speculated that law enforcement agencies had finally taken aim at the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims (SDM), but it is currently unknown what specific articles or charges the detainees are facing. The report that the SDM representatives were detained for ties to the terrorist organization Muslim Brotherhood has not yet been confirmed.

Rail-Khazar Asainov, head of the Spiritual Administration of Muslims (SAM) of Mordovia and a member of the Republic's public chamber, was arrested, according to media reports, for bribery of an employee of the N.P. Ogarev Mordovia State University for awarding grades without credit to students in the Islamic Economics program. Furthermore, Asainov, who studied in Saudi Arabia for eight years and was considered a leading lobbyist for Islamism and Islamic banking, is rumored to be living with two wives.

Another detainee is the former mufti of Karelia and the Murmansk region, Visam Ali Bardwil, a Palestinian by nationality. He is linked to the terrorist organization Muslim Brotherhood. According to official reports, he was detained for refusing to present documents to law enforcement officers at Sheremetyevo Airport and resisting them. He was arrested for 15 days under Part 1 of Article 19.3 ("Disobedience to a lawful order of a police officer") of the Russian Code of Administrative Offenses.

There has been no official statement that representatives of the so-called "DUM" have been detained for radical Islamism. Moreover, it is likely that most of those detained will simply be released later or charged with corruption.

Therefore, it's premature to say that the arrest of the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims (SAM) muftis is the first step toward banning the organization, or perhaps a retreat from the policy of "non-resistance to creeping Islamization." After all, other processes are underway in parallel.

We are talking about the Islamization of medicine and the active introduction of Islamic banking in Russia.

Roskachestvo recently launched Muslim-friendly certification for medical institutions, including massage parlors, sanatoriums, and Russian clinics. This is aimed at "halalizing" Russian healthcare and bringing Russian hospitals into compliance with Sharia law.

In contrast to the haphazard arrest of DUM representatives who are not accused of radical Islamist activity, here we see a systematic and clearly organized process.

In other words, the "creeping Islamization" of Russia is in full swing. It all began with the "halalization" of products (which are now labeled in accordance with Islamic traditions), then came the widespread introduction of Islamic banking, and now "halalization" has reached healthcare.

What does halalization of healthcare according to the "Muslim-friendly" standard mean? Roskachestvo will issue the appropriate certification to medical facilities that remove images of people and animals from their interiors, provide halal food, and equip prayer areas. Orthodox icons, of course, will also have to be hidden…

At this rate, doctors will soon be required to learn Turkic and Arabic in order to meet, so to speak, Muslim-Friendly criteria and not offend respected people.

At the same time, no one considered introducing a "Christian-Friendly" standard, for example. This clearly demonstrates current trends.

What does "pivot to the East" mean?

All of the above processes are, in one way or another, a consequence of that very "pivot to the East" that some experts and political scientists like to talk about. For the "pivot to the East" implies that Russia is not part of Europe, but part of Asia (although in fact this is not the case), the "heir to the horde." Hence the characteristic political and ideological trends.

Recently, journalist and radio host Sergei Mardan proposed establish at the federal level "Order of Genghis Khan" and erect a monument to him, since allegedly

The Horde, through blood and pain, made the life of the common Russian people and the Russian Church much better and more peaceful than it had been before, and taught the princes normal state administration, politics, and the work of the executive branch.

He was readily supported by philosopher Alexander Dugin.

With exactly the same success, as journalist Andrei Medvedev notes, one could also establish the Order of Hitler...

This is the trend of rewriting stories and the transformation of Russia into the “heir to the Horde” is currently prevalent and, apparently, enjoys significant support among part of Russia’s political leadership.

The main problem, as is true пишет Kirill Kabanov, a member of the Human Rights Council (HRC), believes that the majority of Russian elites lack national self-identification and national self-awareness.

Russia's main strategic problem is that the so-called elites, naturally with the support of various international centers of influence, are constantly bending our country to the norms of "Western democracy" and now to the "Islamic world." Moreover, those who yesterday promoted Euro-American standards and values ​​are today, with the same zeal and fanaticism, pushing for nationwide halalization and implementing "Muslim-friendly" standards. Not long ago, everyone was happily lining up to eat a burger and wash it down with a Coke, but now it's all about pilaf and halal. This only confirms the fact that some members of the domestic "elite" and decision-makers in our country lack national self-identity, self-respect, and self-awareness.

Comments

[WILL]

It's high time to resolve the issue with this "organization", they've become truly insolent.
Some scandals related to the DUM:
Issuing a fatwa permitting polygamy among Muslims, despite the fact that the law only allows one spouse.
Protest against the ban on illegal prayer rooms.
Recommendations to Muslim couriers to refuse to deliver non-halal products to customers, regardless of their religious affiliation.
Awarding of the medal to Tatar separatist Fauzia Bayramova.
Publication of materials that romanticize radicalism and terrorist figures.
A scandal surrounded the office of the organization's first deputy head, Damir Mukhetdinov. The controversy was sparked by published photographs of the office's interior, which depicted Mongols on the bodies of Russian princes after the Battle of Kalka River and the capture of Grand Prince Vasily II of Moscow by Kazan Tatars near Suzdal.

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: ANIMAL

It's high time to resolve the issue with this "organization"

It's a shame that the country's elite, or at least a significant portion of it, not only doesn't care, but is actually condoning the Islamization of a non-Islamic country. In other words, it's condoning the destruction of Russia.

[paul3390]

The most interesting question is: why is creeping Islamization being actively pushed across practically the entire planet? What's the point of it for globalists, and why are national governments going along with it? This is what's completely incomprehensible.

[Yura]

Quote: paul3390

Why is creeping Islamization being actively pushed across almost the entire planet?

When it comes to migrant resettlement, whether in the US, Europe, or Russia, the elites don't even consider the issue of faith in the implementation process. The main thing is money and the exploitation of migrants. They are easily manipulated with money, a tool for enrichment in itself, easily manipulated for any purpose, to suit the interests of lobbyists. They can be used to launder ill-gotten gains and criminal schemes, issuing cash in exchange for legally obtained non-cash. They can be used to influence state policies through protests, pogroms, and various movements. These are just some of the ways migrants can be used, and we understand that specific individuals are behind this, for most of whom genuine, good intentions for specific countries are of secondary importance, if at all.

[Tatyana]

I had a case in the summer in July 2022. That's exactly when, when only 3,5 months have already passed since the start of the SVO.
I was waiting at the bus stop with some migrant construction workers from Central Asia. They were loud and rowdy. They started harassing a Russian man from St. Petersburg and his family. They started pushing him. Besides them and me, there was no one else at the bus stop.
I made one remark that they are still guests here and it’s not good to behave like that at a party - bullying local people. And the young man answered me in Russian that they HAVE THE COMPLETE RIGHT to behave this way.
“I wonder why you think so?” I asked.
"Because St. Petersburg is our city, not yours! It's only for your temporary use," he replied. "All these houses"—he gestured toward the Khrushchev-era and new apartment buildings located around them—"they'll all be ours. We're not building houses for you, but for ourselves. We'll live in them later."
- Then where are we, the indigenous people, going to go from here?
In response, he grinned slyly and shrugged his shoulders ambiguously.
- Why do you think so? Who told you that?
- So Allah told us! So the Quran teaches us. This city (St. Petersburg) and all of Russia will be ours! For this is our land! And you are only temporarily residing here. You will not live and manage here for long.
- Are you serious?!
- Of course yes!
- And when will it happen?
- Soon!
- Do you go to the mosque? I asked.
- Yes.
- And how old are you, if not a secret?
- Seventeen! he replied proudly.

This 17-year-old foreign migrant from Central Asia spoke Russian well—one might even say, purely. He was clearly a second-generation foreign migrant in Russia. And he most likely studied at a Russian school.

[futurohunter]

The Quran couldn't have taught them this. It doesn't say anything like that. Moreover, this young militant never opened the Quran. He was taught this by very specific "mentors."

[squid]

You're putting the cart before the horse. The "globalist" elites (they used to be called something else) already have almost all the money in the world. Money is a tool. The means is the erosion of countries with a Caucasian population by millions of people of color, whether Muslim or not. The goal is the destruction of white peoples.

[Per se.]

Quote: paul3390

What good is it for globalists, why do national governments do this?

Compare the Gospel and the Quran, parables and specific instructions. Faith and religion... From shamans and priests to modern denominations, it's easy to make money and gain influence from faith in God. Moreover, God doesn't need intermediaries and hasn't delegated any authority to impostors, who have essentially become pimps of faith, inventing religions to suit a specific culture and mentality, with only their own denomination having the "right god." Therefore, the geography of religions is revealing, revealing where it is most aggressive and intolerant. Slaves are needed.

[Tatyana]

Quote: Per se.

Compare the Gospel and the Quran, parables and specific instructions. Faith and religion... From shamans and priests to modern denominations, faith in God is a convenient way to make money and gain influence.

That's right!
Essentially, modern radical Islam is a form of business for neo-Muslims. Moreover, Islam lacks a one-man rule, unlike Orthodoxy—the Russian Orthodox Church. Therefore, each imam can interpret Islam as they see fit.

In business, one can trade not only goods and services, but also ideas in the form of a diverse range of one's own ideologies, such as charlatan mysticism, for the conversion of Muslims and the replacement of Russia's indigenous population according to the Western models of MI6 and the CIA from London and Washington.
And the privileged parasitic devastation of the indigenous Russian population of our country – our Russia – by foreign migrants – by globalists in Britain, the USA, Germany and Israel, as well as by Nazis of all stripes in the EU and Turkey – is very pleasing.

[Hagakure]

Islam can hardly be considered a religion; it's a social project. And comparing Christianity (read: Orthodoxy) with Islam is like comparing heaven and earth...

[Per se.]

Quote: Hagakure

This is a social project.

A social project? Islam was created with a strong eye on Christianity, which offered a very attractive "carrot" for the rabble and slaves: PARADISE. Earthly life is unimportant; be patient and repent, and in Paradise you'll get everything, rams and a harem of virgins. The Roman Empire was languishing with its temples to Jupiter, Mars, and other "specialists" in the patronage of the gods. Emperor Constantine and his wife Helena realized the benefits of legitimizing Christianity, a new religion gaining popularity among the slaves. Artifacts supposedly connected in one way or another to Christ were quickly discovered; even, a few years later, the cross on which the Romans crucified the healer and philosopher was discovered. An instrument of torture and execution has become seemingly sacred; it's hard to imagine what would have become a symbol of Christianity if the Romans had hanged or impaled... In Islam, there are no crosses, crescents, or moons and nights. Whether to believe or not is up to each individual, but God can't be his own. If Allah created everyone and everything, and his will is the same as the creation of other people, a different language, and different customs, who then has the right to challenge his will and pit people against each other? The point is that in religions, flocks are important, like income and influence; anything lost to the outside is harmful and dangerous, leading to the loss of a convenient trough. God undoubtedly exists; a DNA molecule doesn't just appear. Without a creator, everything would follow the path of least resistance, just as an electric current flows, or a river erodes the weakest rocks, not the other way around. The whole question is, what relationship do priests have with God, who authorized them to speak in his name, to shed blood through inquisitions, to carry out Crusades or declare Jihad, to call others infidels.

[Stepnyak]

Ooh! How brilliantly you reason! I'm not being sarcastic, by the way. I've thought about this a lot too. Any religious denomination is a business. And in business there's always competition. So, followers of one religion, singing psalms in an unknown Latin, and other fanatics, singing suras in an unknown Arabic, are killing each other. YOU'RE RIGHT!!!

[futurohunter]

Islam and Christianity are modified Judaism for non-Jews. Or, more precisely, Christianity is a modified teaching of the Jewish sect of the Essenes. The branches of Christianity also diverged later. Judaism, however, was created on the basis of earlier Middle Eastern religions, including Zoroastrianism and the religion of the ancient Egyptians. Any established religion is a project. Christianity is for Europeans. Islam is for Arabs. Arabic is the language of Islam. Any Arab, even a Christian, is essentially a Muslim from birth. Islam and Christianity diverge in the roles of God and Christ (the savior). Also, Christianity does not have a Prophet Muhammad. But otherwise, they are roughly the same. Even the names of saints and angels are the same.

[futurohunter]

Don't confuse religions and religious institutions. Religions in themselves are neither good nor bad, and Islam is no better or worse than Christianity. In fact, they are practically twins and brothers—both are modified versions of Judaism for non-Jews, only Islam is 600 years younger.
The danger is posed by certain "religious" figures who begin to use religions for their own purposes, interpreting them as they need.

[Per se.]

Quote: futurohunter

Don't confuse religions and religious institutions.

What religious institutions existed when Perun or Zeus, or even earlier, forest spirits or "holy stumps," were worshipped? There is faith, and there is religion. One can believe in God or in communism, but religion is the worship of the "right god," adapted to local customs, culture, and mentality. Religions are created precisely to accommodate both "religious figures" and political ones who can exploit religion for their own ends, whether within the established canons and dogmas or by embellishing it in their own way. Essentially, Christ's teachings have already become an "interpretation," a schismatic movement. Therefore, the Jewish clergy found it safer to deal with the bandit Barabbas, who, through their influence, was pardoned instead of Christ.
The point is that all previous religions, as a rule, declared everything that came before them to be heresy, paganism, to eliminate competition from older beliefs. This has always been the case, and will always be the case. Religions come and go, changing as society evolves. The clergy burned Giordano Bruno, and now the Vatican even acknowledges the possibility of extraterrestrial life, and what's that about the Earth's rotation?

[futurohunter]

Communism is not believed in—it contains no immaterial entities (deities, spirits, etc.). Communism is an idea, not a faith. And don't confuse religious institutions (political organizations) with religion (theory)! Religions could arise spontaneously, like the paganism you mentioned, or be developed purposefully, like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The "Encyclopedia of Islamic Doctrines and Sects" explicitly states that all these "varieties of Islam" were directly created by certain figures for their own political purposes. And within Islam, as well as Christianity and Judaism, there is considerable political struggle. Christianity itself was a development of the teachings of the Judaic sect of the Essenes. The Jewish high priests saw a threat rather in the person of a certain prophet, now called Christ—which, by the way, is not a name, but a title—"savior, anointed of God." It remains unknown whether this "prophet" actually existed, what his name was, and when he might have lived. Or perhaps he was a composite figure? For there were many like him in the Middle East at the time! Moreover, he called himself the "King of the Jews," and perhaps had the right to rule. Or perhaps he really was a "prince." Therefore, the Jewish high priests essentially prevented a coup d'état. Incidentally, was this "prophet"? Another question is that this teaching was modified for export, and then became convenient for the authorities of the Roman Empire. And if we delve into Judaism itself, we will uncover Zoroastrianism, Egyptian polytheism, and other Middle Eastern religions.
Paganism is essentially polytheism, which translates as... "folk religion." That is, one not governed by priests. Heresy is a deviation from the official religion accepted in a particular state, with its own claims to power.
In general, the history of religions is, in its purest form, the political history of the struggle of certain groups for power and resources, under the guise of “faith.”
In short, everything is as usual.
Religions cannot help but be modified by their theorists in accordance with the "demands of the times", otherwise, religious organizations will lose their "flock".
Giordano Bruno was not burned for "the rotation of the Earth" or "aliens"—the authorities of the time were unconcerned about these ideas; these were well-known and fashionable among the liberal aristocracy of the time. Bruno preached against the most important tenets of Christianity, effectively founding his own sect, and posed a serious threat to church authority. According to some reports, he even conducted "black masses."

[Per se.]

Quote: futurohunter

Giordano Bruno was not burned at the stake for "the rotation of the Earth."

Not for rotation, he denied key Christian dogmas, but, in the same way, Copernicus could have been burned if he had persisted in his life that “the Earth rotates.”
The fact that "they don't believe in communism"... Those who didn't believe became renegades and turncoats, not to mention the essence of careerists and opportunists.
You can't do well what you don't believe in. Religion isn't synonymous with faith, but it's religion that has begun to exploit faith for its own ends more than anything else. I've already spoken about the pimps of faith based on religion. As one movie character said, all people believe: some believe that God exists, others believe that God doesn't exist... You can believe in God, you can believe in communism, you can believe in anything, even worship radiation or the great fission of the atom.
Religion can be accepted only as part of history and folk culture, provided that customs and rituals are within the framework of universal human values ​​and high morality.
What these fat priests have turned religion into, exploiting faith only, is hardly cause for optimism. Otherwise, to each their own. I believe in the "great programmer" who created both sheep and wolves, good and evil, everything that makes life for us. The whole question is, what are we for? Goldfish to be admired, or sheep to be sheared for wool, or barbecued for meat? Perhaps the soul is that pearl in a mollusk that a person nurtures as a kind of honey for divine energy? Let everyone decide for themselves. Thank you for the dialogue, all the best.

[futurohunter]

You're making a fundamental mistake in your reasoning. Believers believe in something otherworldly, which they call God, spirits, angels. An atheist couldn't care less. He doesn't even think about it. In his worldview, there are no otherworldly entities. Believing in communism is very strange. You can either KNOW AND UNDERSTAND what it is, or you can't.
Those who destroyed the USSR and introduced capitalism weren't some kind of turncoat. These people, greedy and self-serving from childhood, raked in the cash. In the USSR, they parasitized within the Party and Komsomol, climbing to the top to snag as many goodies as possible. When they realized that stealing was no longer prohibited, they stole everything, declaring themselves capitalists. But there was also a small number of fanatics and idiots who sincerely believed in "Atlas straightening his shoulders." Another issue is that the majority, after all, have a "snout in the cannon," and those who weren't shot in the wild 90s are living very comfortably. And their only faith is in the power of money and the depth of their pockets.

[futurohunter]

I'll add. It's unlikely that "someone" created us. We'll never know for sure whether that someone exists or not. And it doesn't matter. Man is the pinnacle of evolution, the pinnacle of what has appeared on planet Earth. No human has ever seen anything more advanced. And whether he will create a better life or destroy himself and his planet depends only on him. Although, he won't destroy the planet. He doesn't have that kind of power. But he can destroy himself.

[carpenter]

Quote: paul3390

The most interesting question is: why is creeping Islamization being actively pushed across almost the entire planet?

There is not a SINGLE church in Saudi Arabia.
Christianity is banned.
Meanwhile, there are over 100 'Sharia Courts' operating in Britain.
Let that sink in.

[cast iron]

Why is creeping Islamization being actively pushed across almost the entire planet?

Poor education and obscurantism are very beneficial to the ruling class. Mentally retarded obscurantists are much easier and more manageable than educated atheists.

[paul3390]

But who will do the work? Modern civilization requires a simply enormous number of specialists in a wide variety of fields: workers, technologists, engineers, scientists...

[Doccor18]

Quote: paul3390

Who will work then?

But why? There's China right next door, where "everything can be bought," well, almost everything... The subsoil is full of resources, and we can export for a long time to come...

Quote: paul3390

technologists, engineers, scientists..

What's the point if a courier or fast food vendor earns much more than an engineer?

[Reptiloid]

Quote: paul3390

But who will do the work? Modern civilization demands...

Greetings Paul Remember what Chubais said about the importance for him of destroying Soviet socialist enterprises. Modern bourgeois are also carefully monitoring and doing everything for blurring proletariat. Russian bourgeois learn from foreign ones.

[your1970]

Quote: cast iron

Why is creeping Islamization being actively pushed across almost the entire planet?

Poor education and obscurantism are very beneficial to the ruling class. Mentally retarded obscurantists are much easier and more manageable than educated atheists.

Yeah, I lashed the educated atheists with a whip for 15 days and that's it, but it doesn't help the backward obscurantists, they don't even know that they're breaking any laws.
That's why the SA commanders groaned when they brought in a full company of Uzbeks/Tajiks

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

And what about educated believers?)

[Fan-fan]

It is much easier to control the mentally retarded than educated atheists.

I agree. In 1977, when I was at university, I took a course called "Scientific Atheism" and passed a test in it. That is, under the communists, religion was considered "the opium of the people," as Bender put it. Under the communists, there was neither Islamization nor Christianization. And now, priests of all stripes have crawled out of their holes and are stirring up trouble. We can't give priests so much freedom. It used to be normal to say that religion was obscurantism, but now it's the opposite, everything has been turned upside down.

[YES UZH]

paul3390]The most interesting question is: why is creeping Islamization being actively pushed across practically the entire planet? What's the point of it for globalists, and why are national governments going along with it? This is what's completely incomprehensible.
The Anglo-Saxons' principles of governing the natives have long been established. They operate from behind the scenes, as a superior race, above the fray, avoiding direct participation whenever possible, without spilling their blue blood. Divide, pit against each other, manipulate, exploit, and be their judge in resolving issues so that they feel the need to do so. Don't openly take sides; deceive, provoke, and dominate and rule over the inferior natives. Hence the position of British intelligence: collecting information, weaknesses, and pressure points, and exploiting human weaknesses, greed, envy, meanness, hatred, etc. For their own purposes. And this has been evident throughout history, without interruption. We have to take this into account. And the Islamists are the most active and combat-ready, numerous, with an ideology, their own chain of command. They are radicals unburdened by conscience or morality, and at the lowest level, religious fanatics ready for anything. All that remains is to explain who they need to fight and why. A very convenient force; it's enough to control the elite. An army practically integrated into any society, self-sufficient.

[SAG]

Basically, everything is to the point. A plus to you. Just please work on your flow. It's difficult to read.

[your1970]

Quote: paul3390

The most interesting question is: why is creeping Islamization being actively pushed across practically the entire planet? What's the point of it for globalists, and why are national governments going along with it? This is what's completely incomprehensible.

The white race is dying out, so they are fussing about it.

[Tatyana]

Quote: paul3390

The most interesting question is: why is creeping Islamization being actively pushed across practically the entire planet? What use is it for the globalists?

One cannot help but pay attention to the specifics of the ideological concept of the American economist Milton Friedman, as set out in his book "Capitalism and Freedom," regarding the alleged existence of the so-called "free market" of capital, goods, and labor with its monetarism (i.e., the pursuit of financial profits). Namely.

Regarding foreign labor migration, historical experience shows that foreign "labor" and other social migrants do not lose contact with their families in their national homeland—that is, in the country of their migration origin to the countries where they earned their living. For example, from Central Asia to Russia. This is especially true when it comes to labor migration—legal and illegal—and their legal and illegal employment.
In this case, Free profits flow into US Federal Reserve banks. And it turns out this way.

Firstly, in practice, when implementing the American globalist concept of M. Friedman in Russia (and in other countries too) It turns out that foreign labor migrants, although they receive wages in Russian rubles, ultimately still work for American currency, and, in essence, pay "taxes" to US Federal Reserve bankers from their work in the Russian Federation (with her permanent mission in England) in the form of bank dollar "usurious %" - and taking up jobs in the Russian labor market for the local Russian population, alienating them from their own means of production as a means of subsistence.
In other words, it turns out that in fact by the end result The manager of Russian means of production and the employer of foreign labor migrants on Russian soil is not Russia, but the bankers of the US Federal Reserve! (It is “their” people who advocate for unlimited foreign labor migration to the Russian Federation.)

In this case, US Federal Reserve bankers, as a result of using foreign labor migration in Russia, are getting rich twice by selling their currency.
The first time, When the Central Bank of the Russian Federation issues rubles for purchased American dollars in order to print rubles and launch the Russian financial system as a whole, and in particular to pay labor in its own Russian labor market, including foreign labor migrants.
And the second time, When foreign labor migrants themselves are required to exchange their earned rubles for US dollars when they leave the Russian Federation, i.e., when they are forced to repurchase the same amount of dollars that Russia once bought for them to pay for their labor—and again, with a "usurious percentage"!
As a result, US Federal Reserve bankers' use of foreign labor migrants in the Russian Federation (and in similar dollarized countries) there is actually a double financial benefit from "easy money" from the sale of the American currency when foreign labor migrants perform the same one-time job. And the more foreign labor migrants there are in Russia, the more profitable it is for the bankers of the US Federal Reserve System.

But this doesn't happen with the indigenous Russian population in principle, since Russians live with their entire families in their homeland. At the same time, US Federal Reserve bankers charge their "usurious interest" to the local population for selling US dollars just once, namely, when the Central Bank of the Russian Federation purchases dollars to issue ruble supply in Russia.

See in detail - "Financial risks to national security of the Russian Federation from foreign labor migration." Published: March 23, 2015 - https://topwar.ru/71406-finansovye-riski-nacionalnoy-bezopasnosti-rf-ot-inostrannoy-trudovoy-migracii.html

[SAG]

This is what is completely incomprehensible.

I don't know what's so confusing about this. Everything is clear. The idea is almost half a century old.
The creation of a caliphate on the territory of the Great Crescent, which would be pushed by economic leverage against Russia from the south, from its soft underbelly.

[futurohunter]

No one questions national governments. And very often, "overseers" from the Global Zionist Network are put in charge of countries. Islamic radicals have their own accounts in the Network's banks and are obedient to the Network. Therefore, they are simply another Network combat unit, capable of destroying entire countries and generally carrying out illegal orders. General slaughter is extremely beneficial to the Network, because in a chaotic environment, it can engage in any dirty deeds without any restrictions. And it can also enjoy "playing chess."

[nordscout]

paul3390, "creeping Islamization" allows "globalists" to more successfully solve the problem of "denationalizing" the world's states and turning them into one big village (kishlak)...

[Shelest2000]

And she directly condones the Islamization of a non-Islamic country. That is, she condones the destruction of Russia.

No questions...

[gsev]

Quote: Vladimir_2U

and she directly condones the Islamization of a non-Islamic country.

Islamists paint vivid pictures online of how they subdue Russian slaves who converted to Islam. They also offer medical centers where they can perform hysterectomy, cut the tubes to render a slave infertile, or sever the vocal cords to render her mute.

[Pravodel]

...the top of the country...a significant part of it, not that they don't care, ...directly condones the Islamization of a non-Islamic country

A look into history:
The Bolsheviks and their followers once Ukrainized Ukraine. We see the results now. I wouldn't want a repeat of such a scenario in the territory of great Rus'.

[ZovSailor]

It is important not to screw things up here, as has happened repeatedly in Russia since the time of the culture and civilization of Ancient Rus.
Religion, given the multinational and multi-confessional composition of the Russian people, requires a competent approach.
Let us recall the large number of enemies from among the Petty British who worked under the cover of the Petty British embassy in Russia, expelled precisely for attempts to undermine Russian society from within by organizing hostile cells at the expense of emigrants arriving from abroad.

[BlackTiger74]

It's important not to screw things up here.

Personally, I am a Muslim, but I am against this idea!!!

[ZovSailor]

BlackTiger74
Today, 07: 27
Personally, I am a Muslim, but I am against this idea!!!

In my post, I am simply voicing my position: Let the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims justify and prove its usefulness to the people and the state, but undermining the foundations of society and the state is unacceptable, especially in the context of the SVO.

[YES UZH]

=BlacTiger74]

It's important not to screw things up here.

Personally, I am a Muslim, but I am against this idea!!!

The question is who is in charge and what are their goals, what will they instill in their minds? If you blow up a country from within, it's not in the interests of the population. Then the country will split into pieces, and those from outside will come and finish it off. Then the path to Anglo-Saxon world domination is clear. Next comes limiting the planet's population and controlling the entire planet, all its resources, and the survivors who will remain as slaves.

[Fan-fan]

Religion has no place in a civilized society. How can an educated person believe in some kind of god? Where is this god? This whole thing was invented by cunning people who need leverage over people. They need religion to keep the people in check. Essentially, dividing people by nationality and religious beliefs should be banned and not allowed anywhere. It's better not to even mention such divisions at all. But here, everything is the other way around, and that's bad.

[futurohunter]

Whether one is a believer and adheres to the views of a particular religion, or is an atheist, is a personal matter. I speak as an atheist. One shouldn't confuse religion with organizations that use religion as a cover to carry out their dirty deeds. Banning religion is pointless. What's needed is a ban on religious extremist organizations and religious propaganda. Regarding educated people... How many people, even with PhDs and doctorates, believed in the likes of Kashpirovsky, Chumak, and other charlatans in the 80s and 90s? The semi-extremist Roerich Society was founded in the 80s by defense industry workers...

[BlackTiger74]

Who are the owners and what are their goals?

The media once showed a very interesting map on the internet, with Erdogan in the background. And according to that map, the Turks are laying claim to vast swathes of Russian territory, all the way to Yakutia!!! They explain this by saying that we speak Turkic languages ​​and they "have every right to lay claim to territories inhabited by Turkic peoples"!!! And yet, the Duma members are actually visiting the Turks to improve their "qualifications"!!! So just think about WHAT kind of goals they might be "investing" there!!!

[futurohunter]

The point is that religion is a personal matter for every person, there are just some unscrupulous people who hide behind religion while doing their dirty deeds.

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: ZovSailor

Let us recall the large number of enemies from among the Petty British who worked under the cover of the Petty British embassy in Russia, expelled precisely for attempts to undermine Russian society from within by organizing hostile cells at the expense of emigrants arriving from abroad.

It is precisely the Islamization of the small-breds that has reached an incredible scale.

[ZovSailor]

Stirbjorn
Today, 10: 06
It is precisely the Islamization of the small-breds that has reached an incredible scale.

It is to them, just like their Charlie, that I wholeheartedly wish to immerse themselves completely in the Islamic world with the loss of sovereignty and independence.
The whole world will just sigh with happiness.
But before this event, it is imperative to pay off the debts to the Indians, Hindus, Egyptians, and Chinars for the colonial past.

[BlackTiger74]

The whole world will just sigh with happiness.

The Naglobrites actually have a huge loaf of bread to "sigh with such happiness"!!! God forbid it falls into the hands of al-Qaeda and the like!!!

[ZovSailor]

BlackTiger74
Today, 12: 56

The small-time shitters have nothing of their own, and all the keys are located beyond the Atlantic herring pool, but there are many who want to sink these shitting islands for all the sins of their inhabitants before people.

[BlackTiger74]

It is enough to take the warheads from the island to some country, and then terrorize them by detonating them

[old rats]

There are plenty of people in the Caucasus who have more than one wife. No one there particularly cares.
The main criterion is whether you can provide for them all financially and show equal care for the children. Besides, it's somewhat prestigious there—being a real man, in every sense of the word.
This is neither good nor bad. This is how it is.
Should we fight this?
Why the hell? Aren't there other problems?

[Gardamir]

It's not about the number of wives. A Muslim is one who recognizes tawhid.

[Cartalon]

If someone has two wives, it means someone has none, and that's a problem.

[cast iron]

If someone has two wives, it means someone has none, and that's a problem.

So you're saying everyone has the same amount of everything now, right? But what about the ton of single men and women who will never have a family? That's a fact and a reality.

[Cartalon]

That is, the level of injustice needs to be increased, give us harems and slavery.

[futurohunter]

Many of these "lonely" people don't want any family, because they are used to living only for themselves...

[Boycott]

Should we fight this?

Well, first of all, it's simply a violation of the country's laws. And if they turn a blind eye to the violation of one law, why should they comply with the rest? So yes, they do.

[ZovSailor]

old rats
Yesterday, 08: 34
Should we fight this?
Why the hell? Aren't there other problems?

Here we need to understand the national security of Russians and the state, which has long been multinational and multi-confessional.
No one is canceling a person’s freedom of choice in religion.
Against this background, I consider certain deviations related to local traditions and customs of the nationalities of the Russian Federation to be entirely acceptable, but this should in no way contribute to the weakening of Russia.
Our country has too many enemies who are trying to undermine society from within through immature young minds and outright traitors.

[Il'nur]

It's high time to resolve the issue with this "organization"

You have the wrong task and goal set; it's not this "organization" that needs to be addressed, but those who are promoting and facilitating this "Islamization" in every possible way; the fish rots from the head...

[futurohunter]

Generally speaking, all religious organizations should be under state supervision and regulation to prevent extremism. As for Mongols in the offices of Islamic radicals, this is pure imposture and a distortion of history. During the Kalka River era, Christianity and Tengrism were dominant among Mongol military leaders. Although there were troops from conquered peoples who professed Islam among the Mongol army, the Mongol "elite" was not Muslim. Moreover, after all these events, there was the "Yellow Crusade," when Mongol troops went to the Middle East to "avenge Christians." And they battered Muslim troops and Muslim states there. A Mongol military leader (like Subedei?) even sent a letter to the Pope, demanding that he come to him and bow down as the "ruler of all Christians."

[123_123]

Considering the dire demographic situation, allowing more than one wife does not seem so inappropriate)

[Reptiloid]

Of course! Sarcasm, Muslim families have many children, and will have two to three times more. The demographics will improve due to the new arrivals.

[Revolver]

Quote: Reptiloid

Demographics will get better for those who have come in large numbers

Russian - yes. Russian - hardly.

[cast iron]

Russian - yes. Russian - hardly.

Rassianskaya. They are creating a new kind of people - "darAgih rasseyantsy."

[Nikolay Malyugin]

National policy in any country is a fragile thing. It must be protected by laws. Any attempt to undermine such policy must be severely suppressed. We must remember that the foundation of our country's life was built on centuries of our existence in this country.

[Same lech]

It's time for us to establish the Order of Dmitry Donskoy and Ivan the Terrible...we can also remember Yermolov...for balance.

[Seal]

+ Order of Baklanov. Three degrees. This refers to Yakov Petrovich Baklanov.

[Gardamir]

Petya the alcoholic's older brother, Fyodor Alekseevich, did the same.
At that time, many new lands on the outskirts were annexed to the Muscovite Tsardom. Of course, there were local tsars and princes, or khans. So, under Feodor Alekseevich, the policy was: if you want to continue ruling as a khanate, you must convert to Orthodoxy. If you don't, you'll be a serf.
And now, not only are they importing, but those who are importing are also expected to be the masters of the country.

[Dedok]

So, under Feodor Alekseevich, there was such a policy: if you want to continue ruling as a khan, be baptized into Orthodoxy.

This policy continued for many years under tsarism: the same Posner - he writes about himself - is a convert!

[Gardamir]

It's even more amusing. Today's people dream of things being like under the Tsar, but in the spirit of Soviet capitalist democracy.

[futurohunter]

Don't confuse Muslims and Jews in the Russian Empire. Muslims weren't restricted in their rights, but Jews were. They could only settle within the Pale of Settlement. Converts to Orthodoxy converted to become full citizens of the Russian Empire. As a reminder, Lenin's maternal grandfather was a convert.

[Dedok]

Don't confuse Muslims and Jews in the Russian Empire.

Am I confusing something?
it was written (by Gardamir):

So, under Fyodor Alekseevich there was such a policy: if you want to continue to rule as a khan, be baptized into Orthodoxy.

I replied:

This policy continued for many years under tsarism: the same Posner writes about himself as a convert!

Am I wrong about something?
and it didn't matter whether they were Muslims or Jews...
the requirements (policy) were the same for everyone...
i.e. it was predictable for everyone

[futurohunter]

You apparently didn't understand what I wrote. Muslims in the Russian Empire had no restrictions on their civil rights! Tatar murzas ruled Kazan peacefully, and no one forced them to convert. Nicholas II had only one general who didn't betray him—Prince Hussein Khan of Nakhichevan, a Muslim. And there were quite a few Muslims among the elite of the Russian Empire! But try finding Jews! Not converts, but halachic Jews!
The tsarist regime didn't see Muslims as a threat, but it treated Jews with suspicion. That's the difference.
If you don't know history, either find out or don't argue!

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

As far as I remember, Pyotr Alekseevich didn't have any plumbers among his brothers. But he did have a younger brother, Pyotr Alekseevich, later dubbed (and deservedly so) the Great.

[Gardamir]

What great thing did he do? Cut off the heads of the archers?
I reread my text five times, what does this have to do with plumbers?

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

Although "Petka the Drunk" is what some idiots might call their neighbor the plumber (no offense to those in that useful profession, by the way). But we've only had one alcoholic ruler, and he was named Boris (and I'm not talking about Godunov, of course).
If all the historical knowledge of the lord about the reign of Peter the Great is limited to the execution of the Streltsy (for participating in an attempted coup d'état, by the way), this characterizes the lord, not the tsar.

[Gardamir]

So you don't feel sorry for the Russian people whose heads this Petya personally chopped off? Incidentally, they both equally revered the West.
Increased taxes, the tightening of serfdom, not only executions but also wars that took lives, increased corruption, the destruction of traditions, reforms of the calendar, writing, and measurement systems, all to please the West.

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

Everything mixed up in the Oblonsky house.
About the heads of Russian people. Once again: and after what did they chop off the heads of these unfortunate citizens, hmm?
Higher taxes, corruption, and wars—were they Peter the Great's invention? Didn't anything like this happen before or after him? The question is: what did this (in combination with other domestic and foreign policy outcomes) produce? And what did it produce? What did it produce was that Russia transformed from a regional power into one of the regulators of European (and then, that is, global) politics. What benefit did the West get from this, eh? In a way, we are still enjoying the fruits of this tsar's labors. And here, Messire shouldn't argue with me, but with great Russian figures, from Lomonosov and Pushkin to Stalin and Vinogradov inclusive, who highly praised the work of Peter the Great.
Let Messire tell any philologist about the negative effects of the writing reform.
Reforms in the cultural sphere—I agree, there were serious excesses. On the other hand, there's a tiny nuance, two actually. First, the cultural upheavals primarily affected the lives of the aristocracy; the common people continued to live by the precepts of their fathers (for the most part). Second, not a single cultural reform was implemented that couldn't be "reversed" after Peter's death. Our country has seen worse "turning points," and the USSR wouldn't let anyone lie—so what? But no one took on the task of restoring the "good old traditions."

[futurohunter]

That wasn't the case. Only the Kasimov khans were baptized, but that was practically the Moscow region. All sorts of Tatar khans and rulers of Central Asia and the Caucasus remained Muslim. And some even entered the Russian elite.

[Gardamir]

Well, you're way off the mark, going back to the 18th and 19th centuries. I'm talking about an earlier time, the 17th century, and smaller princes.

[futurohunter]

Even then, Tatar murzas and beks of the Muslim faith were not deprived of their positions. Although they were not allowed into the royal court. There were no specific restrictions against Muslims, so long as they did not rebel.

[vitaliy20091959]

They don't have a national identity, they don't have brains.

[Good Evil]

Quote: vitaliy20091959

They don't have a national identity, they don't have brains.

And conscience.

[Gardamir]

Conscience is a relic of socialism.

[Stas157]

Sergei Mardan proposed establishing an "Order of Genghis Khan" at the federal level and erecting a monument to him.

This is so radical and illogical that one can confidently assume this character has Stockholm disease. This is when the victim thanks the aggressor and occupier.

[Stirbjorn]

The thread about the Subedei Order was full of commentators praising the latter...like he was a great commander, even though he slaughtered Russians.

[Stas157]

This only confirms the fact that some representatives of the domestic “elite” and decision-makers in our country lack national self-identification, self-respect and self-awareness.

Random people. How did they rise to power and become the elite? Adverse selection and the lack of ideology in the country can explain this.

[Dedok]

Random people.

+ + + + +
There are also some like them - in military uniform...

[Mishka78]

Quote: Stas157

Random people. How did they rise to power and become the elite? Adverse selection and the lack of ideology in the country can explain this.

This is absolutely not true. Random events are impossible there.
These are the most vile, greedy, unprincipled and generally unpleasant people, ready to tear apart their neighbors, betray, destroy any competition, lick the holes of their superiors, beat and humiliate those below them in their hierarchy.
At the same time, they're smart. Or at least, they have a well-developed animal instinct and a cautious gene.
The leader of the Russian nation has been deliberately building this system for the past 26 years. He feels very comfortable and at ease within it. This system rejects random people. The only reason such people can be thrown out is disloyalty. And the reasons for disloyalty are solely greed; they assume they will get more under the new master.
Such a system is indestructible from the outside. No elections, no constitutional amendments, no shifts in ideology, and so on can influence it. Because it's all a smokescreen for the skunkworks and the taxpaying population.

[Stas157]

Quote: Mishka78

Random ones are just impossible there.
They are the most vile, greedy and unprincipled

You're right, of course. These "random" people don't end up there by accident. I just looked at them from a different perspective. This is a look from below at the people's elected representatives and "benefactors." How did they all end up there? The system pushes out the honest and competent, promoting opportunists, careerists, and sycophants. Instead of normal selection criteria, the authorities operate according to the logic of survival and self-interest. The absence of ideology leaves society without direction: morality and service to the common good are replaced by personal interests and self-interest. As a result, the elite is not the bearer of the state, but its parasite: it holds on to power for the sake of resources, protecting its privileges by any means necessary and substituting personal loyalty and corruption for governance.

[Mishka78]

Quote: Stas157

As a result, the elite is not the bearer of the state, but its parasite: it holds on to power for the sake of resources, defending its privileges by any means necessary and replacing governance with personal loyalty and corruption.

This is basically how it happens everywhere.
But this is why the system of checks and balances is implemented.
When appointed officials are confronted by elected legislators, and not by a frantic printer who stupidly approves the decisions handed down by the leader.
When the head of the executive power in a region must be elected by the people, and not appointed by the chief.
When the court is independent and upholds truth and law, and does not simply override the decisions of executive authorities, since all judges are appointed by the leader, etc.
The seeds of all this began to emerge in the 90s. But, unfortunately, circumstances have conspired to essentially return us to pre-revolutionary Russia with its absolute monarchy, where the tsar and a small group of close associates ruled supreme.

[Fan-fan]

That's right, any government, from top to bottom, must be elected by the people. But that's not enough: the courts must be independent, and yet our judges are dependent on the executive branch. What kind of justice can we even talk about? There is no justice.

[futurohunter]

Yep, we have the most independent judges in the world. So independent that even the simplest consumer rights case can drag on for years, until it's impossible to recover anything. And you can't do anything about such a judge, because they're "independent." The internet is already littered with negative reviews about judges' rudeness and the dragging out of even the simplest cases, yet these judges continue to work for hefty salaries. On the contrary, the courts should be under the strictest state and public oversight, and the judges themselves should be under the sword of Damocles.

[futurohunter]

In the 90s, pre-revolutionary Russia was restored, minus the tsar. But the tsar was replaced by Yeltsin's fascist dictatorship...

[Belisarius]

Quote: Mishka78

Such a system is indestructible from the outside. No elections, no constitutional amendments, no changes in ideology, etc., can influence it.

That's right, but you have a typo—such a system is indestructible from the inside. It's just perfectly destructible from the outside.
And one more clarification: such a system would be completely indestructible from within if it were at least somewhat constructive in nature. But no, it is strictly parasiticEssentially, it's a virus that destroys the host organism. As the host organism weakens (by devouring Soviet resources and assets), they inevitably collapse. Unfortunately, however, it's possible that it will collapse along with the host organism...

[Million]

There were no particular problems with religion in the USSR.
This is an intimate matter, but now it is on display!

[g_ae]

But there's good news, too. Russia will build a school in Kyrgyzstan, much to the delight of Deputy Zatulin. As for their own, they say, "There's no money, but hang in there."

[Maks1995]

Since the “creeping Islamization” of Russia is in full swing, it means that someone who has power and resources needs it.
Worker or Doctor Ilya? It's clear as day.
Officials, the rich, Duma members, Dugins, Kadyrovs, Usmanovs and others...

And nothing can be done.
You can't argue with Kadyrov...

[Zaurbek]

Comrade Kadyrov has no problems with Islamism.
But in Dagestan, Tatarstan and the republics of the North Caucasus there are some.
First they opened the doors to everyone: from the Turks to the Wahhabis. Now they've come to their senses.
In Central Asian countries, Islamists are not even sent to general prisons.

[Maks1995]

Maybe not. I'm not an expert.
When the special forces yell "Allahu Akbar" during training exercises, it's probably called something else...

[Zaurbek]

Thank God, you are forbidden to speak?

[Tank destroyerSU-100]

First and foremost, the creeping Islamization of Russia demonstrates the blatant ignorance of many members of the ruling class. They readily heed the promises of Islamic fundamentalists that Shariatization of Russia, bending to Sharia law, will ensure the ruling class an obedient and submissive electorate that will be completely controllable. What these ignoramuses fail to understand is that they themselves will have no place in the ruling class once the Caliphate/Imamate is established. They will be mercilessly ousted from their cushy positions, if not nailed down.
And in vain do these ignoramuses hope that through Islamization they will gain loyal subjects incredibly tolerant of bribery. Bribery will not go away and will flourish, but others will receive this bribe.

[kriten]

The current government is a product of the 90s, that is, the regime of Yeltsin, Gaidar, and Chubais. And it is largely following the same course. But while previously they were looking for a master in the West, more precisely in the United States, now they are looking in the East. True, they haven't yet made a final choice, hence the vacillation. Islamization is rampant, and it is supported by the government, not restrained even where our laws are violated. Protection from infringement of the rights of Russians and Orthodox Christians has faded into the shadows.

[futurohunter]

You are wrong, the real masters of all these Islamists are in the West.

[Zaurbek]

At this rate, doctors will soon be required to learn Turkic and Arabic in order to meet, so to speak, Muslim-Friendly criteria and not offend respected people.

Our doctors should just study well...they don't have time for the Tatar language.

[Anyuta Glorious]

No matter what anyone says, the reason is that Europeans don't have children; Europeans are atheists. A holy place abhors a vacuum! If there's no faith of one's own, a foreign one will be imposed; if there's no population of one's own, there will be others.

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

Sic!
Anna, I wish I could write your words on a gold plaque (I’m being ironic, but not too much).

[Anyuta Glorious]

The problem of Islamization in Russia is similar to that in Europe. In both places, the indigenous population is dying out, leaving behind insufficient numbers of descendants.

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

Unfortunately, this is true. And there's no way out of this situation. Neither they nor our citizens want to have children. And there's truly no faith left. Without this, the only hope is assimilation by more prolific and ideologically united ethnic groups. Nothing has changed here since the Roman Empire, which "barbarized" long before its division.

[Anyuta Glorious]

Europe doesn't have children because it wants to live well. Children are a big expense. That's where they save. So the question is stark. Either a good life, which is already in question, or sacrifice oneself for the future of the country, language, and faith through children. Our grandfathers and great-grandfathers went to kill the enemy in the name of the Fatherland, for those in the rear, so that we could be born. Well, here we are... We are incapable of sacrifice and don't want to. If so, then we will live out our days under a foreign banner, in a foreign culture and faith. There is no third option.

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

Unfortunately, that's the way it is. Neither they nor our citizens want to have children, and this gap (especially in the context of the events of recent decades) can no longer be filled.
And faith (or ideology, if some prefer that term) as a powerful factor of social consolidation and identification is practically nonexistent—both among the "gardeners" and among us. And without all of this, as you rightly noted, there's only one prospect: assimilation by more prolific and ideologically united ethnic groups. Nothing has changed here since the Roman Empire, which "barbarized" long before its division.

[Anyuta Glorious]

If the Russian and Orthodox people can see the light and overcome their own urges, they will survive. They will definitely survive, and this will bear fruit in 15-20 years. Russia's turn to the West brought the same problems! Demographic decline and Islamization. In my opinion, Russia ended in 1917. My paternal great-grandmother had seven children. Four survived. My grandmother had two of her own and raised three more. My father had two daughters. I also have two children. In other words, we have merely reproduced ourselves in the last two generations. That's a pittance... And Muslims have at least three or four children.

[futurohunter]

You're wrong. Russia only awoke from a long slumber in 1917. And then fell into a deep slumber again in 1991... Since the early 2000s, there have been attempts to awaken it, but so far they've been insufficient...
And the problem is also excessive Westernization. We're still copying Western models that aren't the best...

[Anyuta Glorious]

You and I apparently have different knowledge of history and understanding of it.

[futurohunter]

And in vain. The Soviet period was the period of Russia's greatest prosperity in every respect. This cannot be denied.

[Anyuta Glorious]

You're measuring with a relatively small amount of time. Most likely, you're measuring with the period you just witnessed. The history of the Russian state isn't just 20-30 years old. It's over a thousand years old.

[futurohunter]

Anyuta, I know this very well – many of my friends are professional historians. And I'll repeat: the Soviet period was the period of Russia's greatest prosperity in every respect. It was the USSR that became one of the two superpowers, mastered atomic energy, and sent a man into space. People stopped starving, and 100% of the population became literate. The most terrible infections were conquered. Here's an example. Many people like to vacation on the Black Sea. But did you know that before the Soviet era, these parts were considered a lost cause? All because of the terrible malaria that simply decimated the population. It was only under Soviet rule that malaria was conquered, and these places became a resort.
Soviet Russia was able to win the most terrible war in history, the likes of which had never been seen before.
In 70 years, the USSR made a gigantic leap forward, the likes of which no other country had ever achieved. Only China, at the beginning of the 21st century, was able to overtake the USSR in terms of development and achievements. The USSR had everything... there was no poverty or destitution, unlike pre-revolutionary Russia. You're talking about history. Look at history: what the USSR achieved in 70 years, and what Russia "achieved" after the destruction of Soviet Russia.

[Anyuta Glorious]

Despite all the USSR's successes, no one came out to defend the state in 1991. And who destroyed it? The communists themselves. Moreover, the children of the USSR's leaders fled the USSR by any means necessary. Germany's greatest triumph was under Hitler, so what next?
Italy's greatest prosperity was during the Roman Empire's slave trade. Should it be restored? Have you ever considered why the British, through Kerensky, and then the Germans, through Lenin, sought to destroy the Russian Empire? Understand, the USSR is no longer possible. At least not in the coming decades.

[futurohunter]

Anyuta, forgive me, but your understanding of history is extremely superficial. If you're interested in the reasons for the collapse of the USSR, read Sergei (yes, Sergei!) Kara-Murza. No one has described it better. In short, Stalin was assassinated by the remaining Trotskyist traitors, who precipitated the collapse of the USSR. The people were simply fooled by all sorts of myths about "perestroika" and the like, in order to prepare for the destruction of the state. And not just collapsed, but four notorious scoundrels with CPSU party cards simply dismantled it.

The children of the USSR leaders left the USSR by any means necessary

Don't judge by Svetlana Alliluyeva alone—there was significant American intelligence involvement. Overall, that's not true. And there were many recruited traitors in the top leadership of the USSR, right up to Gorbachev.

Germany's greatest rise was under Hitler, what next?

Are you concerned about Germany or our country? The USSR "took off" on its own, not by robbing its neighbors.

Italy's greatest rise was during the slave trade in the Roman Empire.

There was no such country then as Italy! It appeared just over 160 years ago.

Since you're talking about the Roman Empire, it ended just over 470 years ago. Yes, in the 16th century! Because the empire that the West called Byzantine called itself Roman (Roman). And we called it that too. The Turkish Sultan, who captured Constantinople, also called himself the Roman Emperor. Russia, as we know, is the Third Rome, the heir to that same Roman Empire. And then there was the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. And the United States also claims to be the Fourth Rome.
Forgive me again, but your head is a jumble of historical fables and myths. The British didn't destroy the Russian Empire through Kerensky! More precisely, the British had a hand in the overthrow of the last tsar, but then they sort of handled the rest themselves. The French brazenly supported the Provisional Government, and they certainly didn't want Russia to collapse. They wanted the Russian army to continue fighting against Germany, and it was Lenin who led the country out of that unnecessary and disastrous war. The Germans didn't help Lenin in any way—that's liberal nonsense! Well, judge for yourself: why did they seal the entire train carrying Lenin and his comrades and do everything they could to prevent any contact with the local population? The Germans undoubtedly had a plan, but Lenin didn't work for them; he worked for his own country! Lenin didn't receive any money from the Germans; Trotsky received it from American Jews. Both Lenin and Stalin tried their best to get rid of Trotsky, as they understood he was a foreign agent, a fascist, and a saboteur. The Russian Empire crumbled as a result of the civil war started by the White fascist liberals who favored the West. It was they who destroyed the country. The Bolsheviks, however, laboriously and for many years, put the country back together.
Therefore, to get rid of prejudices, study history using adequate sources, and not the tons of garbage with which our country has been inundated with the mediation of the West.

Understand, the USSR is no longer possible. At least not in the coming decades.

In the coming years, yes. And it would likely be a somewhat different state. But at the same time, various events are happening. For example, Russia and Belarus created the Union State. An anti-Western uprising occurred on the outskirts of the former USSR, and people's republics emerged. And then the North Atlantic Treaty Organization began. Although I agree, it's extremely difficult to predict.
But there is hope that our country will be reborn, not in words but in deeds, and will become the best country in the world and will again become a superpower, and not at the expense of the nuclear arsenal left over from the Soviet era, but because it will be the best country for people to live in.

[futurohunter]

I'll add something about Italy. Calling the Roman Empire Italy is as incorrect as calling Great Britain England. England is just one of Great Britain's provinces—there are also Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Italy is just one of the provinces of the Roman Empire. And not always the main one. When the Roman Empire split in two, Italy became the center of one, and Greece the center of the other. And before that, Greece had long dominated, even moving its capital from Rome to Constantinople. The residents of the western part were offended and declared their own Ukraine... they seceded.

[Anyuta Glorious]

I agree with you only that Russia's goal is to rise from the ashes. Like a phoenix. I agree that Russia must become a superpower. In fact, in 1991, Russia and China had equal capabilities. But where is China and where is Russia? Shameful, disgraceful! Who is in power in Russia today? Former communists. 😊 First, they robbed the people, took away private property to build a communist state, and once they built it, they robbed the people again to create their own private property. They're still robbing. I recently rewatched "Eternal Call." There was a very interesting dialogue between O. Basilashvili and his communist son-in-law, a traitor. A very revealing dialogue.

[futurohunter]

In essence, in 1991, Russia and China had the same capabilities

Not at all! The USSR's potential in 1991 hadn't yet been destroyed and plundered—that happened in the wild 90s. And back then, there was still a chance for a leap forward...

It's difficult to compare China and Russia—their governments are too different. China, unlike Russia, has preserved the continuity of communist rule. While they may have deviated significantly from communist principles, they have retained some key ideas.
And, forgive me, you don’t know history well.

First, they robbed the people, took away private property, and built a communist state.

There never was a communist state in Russia, and it was never built. Socialism is not communism!
Regarding "robbed." Who was robbed? The rabble, who made up the bulk of the population and from whom there was nothing to take? Or the small group of rich people who took everything from the people?
And, most importantly, the Communists rebuilt the country that those same rich people had destroyed to the ground by starting the Civil War. Essentially, the Communists destroyed the fascists and then built a country where there were no more poor, starving, or illiterate people—everyone was fed and educated. Moreover, you are still benefiting from what was created under the Communists—nothing like this had been created before them, let alone after them... Look at what Russia was like in 1917 and what it was like in 1991. Compare the state of other countries at that time. It was not for nothing that Churchill said that "the Communists took Russia with a wooden plow and left it with space and the atomic bomb." But it wasn't the Communists who robbed it "afterward," but rather Trotskyists in disguise, who wanted to live "like in the West." In fact, it's not that simple, and simple explanations don't work here.
Once again, I recommend you read SERGEY Kara-Murza's books about the USSR, and then you'll get the real picture, not one distorted by pro-Western liberal lies. And Basilashvili himself became a traitor, so it doesn't matter who he played.

[Doctor]

It's too late. I should have done this 20 years ago. It's too late now...

[VladislavZ]

The photo is gorgeous! It really lifts my spirits! But... The corrupt people in their offices will cover everything up. The Muslims have money, which means it's already flowing into the pockets of the Kremlin crooks. 100500%!!!

[VladislavZ]

Actually, it's incredibly stupid to think that "the one sitting on the mountain" doesn't see or suspect anything. Showy baptisms and dipping bodies in ice holes don't change the fact that Rus' is being handed over to the Muslims. And he's perfectly aware of everything. We (the people) elected him. We're lapping it up! At least I have three official guns at home. Life is easier and more peaceful. If a Muslim gets into trouble, I'll punch him in the face before I die. What about everyone else?

[VladislavZ]

I traveled throughout Chechnya in '95-'96 and '99-'21, visiting both the valley villages where the Cossacks were slaughtered and the mountain auls of the highlanders who lived off cattle. They weren't particularly shy about their dealings with small ruminants. I know from their testimony. Whenever I recall it, I immediately feel like vomiting. And they haven't changed...

[VladislavZ]

One time, a group found a "farm" of animals. A family, three sons of a bearded fart, the moose were huge. Naturally, they were buried. In the barn, chained, were two Russian teachers, whom the animals had taken off the Moscow-Grozny train. They had been in chains for several years. They were found in 2000, captured in 1994. They no longer remembered their names. Young animals from neighboring "farms" came to train with them... And who's going to sell me on the idea of ​​Muslim friendliness?

[VladislavZ]

I was studying back in the 90s, and at the beginning of autumn, we students were driven to help the collective farms. We met all sorts of people in the dorms there. I was into wrestling back then, and fate brought me together with people from the Caucasus. We drank and got high, but what stuck... A bearded wrestler, a friend of mine, in the company of the same friends said to me: "Anyone here who didn't love a goat is not a man. That's the law." I asked: "And you, too?" He replied: "I'm still a boy." WHO AMONG YOU WOULD ALLOW THEMSELVES TO SAY THAT ABOUT YOUR PEOPLE!!??? It was the truth, and I've heard it confirmed more than once. I didn't stand there with a candle, thank God, but I believe the words of Muslims. What's the point of lying about himself? That's just how they are. Indiscriminate. Bestiality... And therefore, contrary to God.

[VladislavZ]

And to top it all off, Caucasians for some reason think and believe that if they're "on top" in a homosexual couple, they're the men. No, there are two homosexuals, and that's what makes a couple. If a homosexual rapes, he's a homosexual. Showing off your baby to other males is a sign of homosexuality. There's constant confusion about this in the Caucasus. If you're aroused by someone of the same sex... Then—TROUBLE!!!

[futurohunter]

VladislavZ
These aren't Muslims, they're downright savages. I hope you treated them all as they deserved.

[VladislavZ]

Not always... There was an incident in Grozny where tank crews found a "white tights." She was sleeping in a sleeping bag, with an SVD and rations nearby. They tied one leg to a tree, the other to a car, and took off. After a while, the FSB arrived, held a formation, and shot the executioners right there in the line with a Makar pistol to the temple. Moral of the story: we are not executioners, we are soldiers. And we cannot stoop to the level of executioners. That is not our right! If someone is aiming at you or a friend, shoot them, you have every right. Without hesitation. But to execute...

[VladislavZ]

The moose in Chechnya were stubborn and unwilling to give in. They tore through walls with PKM rifles on a metal truck.

[VladislavZ]

I'm still a living witness to the unimaginable atrocities one person can inflict on another. More than two decades have passed, and I still have nightmares; life is painful for me... And what about the guys in the SVO? I had to develop amnesia to live a normal life...

[Metallurg_2]

Anyone who received a spiritual education in the Persian Gulf countries is a 100% Wahhabi. They should all be prosecuted under Article 205.

[futurohunter]

This is not true. Every religious educational institution has its own reputation. And in Arab countries, local intelligence agencies are well aware of which ones are hotbeds of extremism, and they fight them. Watch the film "The Cairo Conspiracy."

[APASUS]

Under the USSR, Tatars were Muslims, but there was no religious affiliation. I traveled along the Volga region, even to the small village of Mechet. This is how we'll slide into a religious state.

[futurohunter]

Well, here we have a church in every yard. What's the difference? Religion has become fashionable everywhere. But most "believers" know nothing about their religions, including ours. Stop someone wearing a cross on the street and ask: Has he ever opened a Gospel book? This is what all sorts of crooks take advantage of.

[APASUS]

Quote: futurohunter

Well, in our country there's a church in every yard. What's the difference?

The difference is that our teachers are usually Muftis trained abroad, and Islam there is a little different (to put it mildly). And our church appoints its own clergy; our priests don't study in Istanbul.

[futurohunter]

What does "another Islam" mean? There are two main branches: Sunni Islam and Shiism. And there are a ton of variations, like Sufism and so on. And there are quasi-Islamic ones, like Alawism—remember Bashar al-Assad. What you're talking about is called "Kharijism"—a free interpretation of Islamic doctrine for one's own purposes and not encouraged by official religious organizations. Even teachers at completely official and canonical Islamic educational institutions can be Kharijites. It all depends on their moral convictions. You'd better not talk about "our priests"—that's a separate, large, and sensitive topic.
Let me remind you that Christian extremism also exists... Fortunately, not in our country.

[APASUS]

Quote: futurohunter

What does "another Islam" mean? There are two main branches: Sunni Islam and Shiism. And there are a ton of variations, like Sufism and so on. And there are quasi-Islamic ones, like Alawism—remember Bashar al-Assad? What you're talking about is called "Kharijism"—a free interpretation of Islamic doctrine for one's own purposes and not encouraged by official religious organizations.

You understand everything perfectly well, why are you asking these questions to the Orthodox?

[futurohunter]

The question was asked about your understanding of what you wrote. What followed was an explanation of how things really are.

[Clear]

He was readily supported by philosopher Alexander Dugin.

Dugin, Prilepin... and other Horde members..., they are generally on good terms when they defend the destruction of Russian people and cities. Of the 74 cities of Rus, 49 were devastated and destroyed, 14 disappeared forever... Russians were driven into the Horde...

[VladislavZ]

I agree! History is written by the victors. So who won? Has Kozelsk already been forgotten? The creeping Muslimization is underway and the pace is accelerating...

[PVV22121922]

It feels like "our" government isn't really ours at all. There are deals, migrants, freeloaders, and so on all over the place. What's going on in their heads, where do they come from?

[VladislavZ]

If we come to the realization that these are moral eunuchs, our path (which is not a Russian rebellion) is to vote. We must remove these eunuchs.

[Rockerman]

Quote: paul3390

The most interesting question is: why is creeping Islamization being actively pushed across practically the entire planet? What's the point of it for globalists, and why are national governments going along with it? This is what's completely incomprehensible.

It's all quite clear. The small-timers organized, I think, an IQ study of their population last year. It turned out that the majority of Muslim migrants have an IQ 10 or more points lower than the native islanders. The conclusion is, the golden billion doesn't need literate and educated slaves/laborers. They can read and write, and not all of them, and that's good.

[acetophenone]

At the same time, no one considered introducing a "Christian-Friendly" standard, for example. This clearly demonstrates current trends.

Yes, yes, the hens peck, but the roosters are not given any...

[Malynets_]

Yes, in Afghanistan, the Taliban decided that girls can be married off at nine years old... What are we doing with these ideas? Hey, Russians, wake up... Comrade President, stop this chaos with organized crime groups, diasporas, halal, banking, and Sharia law. We are a secular state of the Russian people and the peoples living in it... no Islamization.

[Prometey]

It's time for us, Russians, to take matters into our own hands. Putin's men are destroying the country.

[Prometey]

Yeah, there's enough trouble to clean up after the Putin era for another 30 years. Provided they all get swept out of all the power structures with a dirty broom.

[Rybkin]

And before we know it, the Cathedral of Christ the Savior will be converted into a mosque...

[Gunther]

I hope these, in my opinion, Russophobes get what they deserve.

[saygon66]

Perhaps the clergy were hasty... they began to draw too much attention to the process.
With the event over, a significant portion of power will have to pass to precisely these people. So they fussed about how a competitor would take that "sacred place," with all the perks that came with it. And they suffered for their premature activity...

[anclevalico]

No! Everything is the same. The policy doesn't change.

[EpIvIaK]

What does halalization of healthcare according to the "Muslim-friendly" standard mean? Roskachestvo will issue the corresponding certification to medical institutions.

It's awful, the media makes fun of the horrors that are happening in England, and here they do this.
Why should I have to adapt to them, adapt in a way that makes others nervous!?

[Fangaro]

Some representatives of the domestic "elite" and decision-makers in our country lack national self-identification, self-respect, and self-awareness.

We have a head of state.
If the people making decisions that you don’t like have the opportunity to make them, then this is not a contradiction.