Military Review

Curse of the Nobel Peace Prize

21
Curse of the Nobel Peace PrizeWhat is happening in the world already seems directly connected with the US president. Well, there can not be so much bloodshed in the world without any connection, just like that. For no reason, people just don't shoot each other. It seems that such reasons are found in the US administration. Someone such thoughts will surprise, they say someone would doubt, but the matter is somewhat different.


The point is not only that the US special services do their work and do not look at the “assurances of friendship and cooperation” issued by President Obama. The point here is probably not even that Obama is sincere or insincere in his statements. It seems that permanent failures in foreign policy are more than just some bad luck or bad work of the administration staff. It looks like an evil rock hangs over the Nobel laureate.

It must be said that not only war poisons the life of a Nobel laureate. There are events in the world today that are very less bloody for the people, but simply bloodless states. For many years now, the author of this article bawls that the greatest damage and reputational losses for the United States come from within the country. None of the former opponents of the United States or currently living, sworn Islamists or moderate anti-Americanists, Bin Laden or Assad, or anyone else can do as much damage as the United States does. Bush made a reservation exactly according to Freud when he said that "..the terrorists are trying to inflict damage on the United States and we, for our part, are doing the same." In fairness it must be said that the primacy in the damage to the United States belongs to the United States itself.

The heavily moderated conflict in Syria, and even its deliberate escalation may not bring events similar to what happened on September 11 for the United States, but significantly expands the circle of individuals interested in such a development. The BV conflict is expanding and growing like a plague epidemic. There are more and more "hit" ones, and this will surely raise questions, how did it happen? What caused the death of loved ones? Who pursued what goals? And it is here that the circle of people who, in the opinion of “those who ask questions,” can give an answer, can be quite clearly shaped. And the answer is that citizens of many countries of the world are demanding more and more insistently now.

Is it any wonder that after this the hatred for the USA grows? Very often (although now less often than before) we hear about the national interests of the United States at a point which is at a distance equal to half the globe from the territory of the United States. The question of what might be primarily the national interests of the country itself which is so far from Uncle Sam is superfluous. Uncle Sam himself determines where his priorities are.

Needless to say that people living in some Sierra Leone or in some other country are surprised that, having become the national interests of the USA, they will now have to listen to everything that any silly insane McCain or anyone else says .

Sprawling controversies around the world arise, of course, not by themselves, but of course, with the assistance of the US and the EU. This should not argue. Using the slogans of democratization of society, the United States today is surprised that, along with the development processes of which they constantly repeat, national traditions that have little resemblance to democratic ones emerge. The response of the local, intra-state society becomes the strengthening of religious hatred and religious struggle. That is, by expanding the unrecognized right of the United States to the truth, the President of the United States leads world relations to constant clashes. To be fair, President Obama does this much less than President Bush, for example, but in the current case, of course, it is present.

Winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, yet turned out to be not so peaceful. Then why is he a winner? Only because, unlike the tens or even hundreds of thousands killed and wounded in other countries under President Bush, under President Obama there are only thousands killed and wounded?

It was foolish to write an article if there were only exclamations and moans. Let's look at the facts. Let's see what changes have occurred in current conflicts and hot spots. President Obama said that he would close Guantanamo and of course did not close. The situation in Guantanamo is such that more than 100 people went on a hunger strike. What do they want? Yes, at least something! They were detained without presentation of charges and without imposing sentences. That is, they are deprived of the most democratic rights for which the United States is fighting. Vinipuh said in this case: In my bee something suspect. In the same way, the world community sees that the USA declares one thing and does something quite different.

The withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan was also a big question. If earlier it was said about the withdrawal of troops and even the dates were called, now it is said that the withdrawal will be partial. That is, the girl will be partially pregnant. By the way, evil tongues say that the United States wants to leave just enough troops to provide uninterrupted supply of heroin to Russia. Does it benefit the USA? It probably goes if the United States sets itself the task of really continuing to kill Russians by exporting drugs to Russia. History with super-cheap alcohol Royal someone remembers? Then the Russians simply tried to lime with alcohol. Now it looks like it will be drugs.

The situation in Syria is no better. For a long time, the Western media tried to convince the whole world that Assad was a bloody dictator, and now it turns out that those who fight against Assad are simply fiends. Everyone remembers the shots on which the fallen Syrian military was subjected to unprecedented outrage, when the so-called "rebel" cut out his heart from his chest and began to tear it furiously with his teeth. Here it is your democracy dear Mr. Obama. Do you still call Assad illegitimate?

When it comes to refugees, then Europe just loses its temper. So I want to say, my friends, but where are the refugees from? It was you who brought the country to conflict and in fact forced the population to leave their country. You supply scumbags weapons and money, and then wonder at the rivers of blood.

Interestingly, Turkey in this case wanted to seem a winner, a regional leader, but it turns out to be just an accomplice to the bloody policy. In principle, the Turkish authorities should expect something in that spirit. The way the Turks do with their Kurds leaves no doubt that democracy does not even smell here. Now the Turks, dissatisfied with the rampant lawlessness in the refugee camps, began to kill their inhabitants. So what is the difference between the Turkish killers and the “bloody” Assad? In general, the Nobel Peace Prize has helped the current US president very little. Of course, his policy is different from the policy of the previous president, but it is not decisive yet.

Nevertheless, the author would pay attention to two points. The first is the appointment of US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, the second is the policy of the Russian President. These are two certain factors that will not only have an impact, but already have a very serious influence on world politics. The appointment of Chuck Hagel is a black day for the Republican establishment. Nevertheless, the US presidential elections showed that the Republicans are not at all in favor of their own citizens, in such conditions, they do not strongly “step up”. If earlier the President of the United States appointed and removed the Secretary of Defense, but did not actually intervene in secret operations of the army and special services, now having received such a figure as Hagel for the post, Obama’s possibilities have significantly expanded, but the possibilities of those who constantly want to pobombit have narrowed considerably. .

The second of these reasons is of course the policy of President Putin. This politician clearly outlines the edges for which the United States is better not to go. Putin is a tough player, but he has one very positive quality, he is impassive, he does not let emotions take over, except when he promised to hang Mishiko’s genaty.

If it occurred to someone to compare the actions of the presidents of Russia and the United States, it would probably have turned out that, with goodwill on the part of the United States, Putin could easily have become a great colleague in the development of relations, but this could happen only after how the USA would restore its image, and it will take a significant number of years. Obama's presidential term is not enough for this. Perhaps even Putin’s next term might also not be enough. So, the “Nobel Prize for Peace” is not here as an assistant, but rather as a means of restraining further bloodshed, but it is not working so well yet.

It is necessary to say one more thing, if today the president of which did not award such a prize, we could even admire his policy to some extent, because the level of threats became lower. The only question is: why? Because of the peace prize or because of the lack of money for the war. According to the author, the peace prize has nothing to do with it. But it turns out that it played a negative role because it set off the massive bloodshed in the world, the main cause of which is undoubtedly the United States. The bias towards Russia in the sense of awards can be seen from the decision not to award the Quadriga with President Putin.

I want to point out a certain point in this case. Well, they decided not to reward, and would not be rewarded, but of course there is little sense in it. Therefore, the version was announced that he would be rewarded, and only then, from a raised height, the organizers decided to refuse this idea with a bang in order to create a greater resonance to the event negative for Putin. In fact, the opposite happened. The West has shown itself in all its cheap glory, and Putin has managed not to take the crap out of this “Euro-vision”.

From all that has been said in this article it follows in a special way that the urgency of the deterrent factor is dictated not by the mental nature of democracy, but still by the very reliable shield of the Strategic Missile Forces of the Russian Federation.

Until the necessary changes occur in the brains of American politicians, Russia must keep the powder dry, including for the lives of Americans, whom their own government sends to die somewhere near the devil on the horns, in the name of corporate profits with beautiful names and democratic slogans.

In the end, it is precisely because of Putin’s harsh policy that we are less likely to hear about American national interests, for example, in Georgia, and generally in the world.
Originator:
http://contrpost.com/
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 22 May 2013 15: 11 New
    +3
    And someone else seriously thinks that international prizes are now given without the influence of politics?
    1. Ataman
      Ataman 22 May 2013 18: 00 New
      +2
      Like who? Dmitry Anatolyevich, who also awarded the order to the Nobel laureate Mikhail Sergeyevich.
    2. Atlon
      Atlon 22 May 2013 20: 23 New
      0
      From the article ...
      What is happening in the world already seems to be connected directly with the US president. Well, there cannot be so much bloodshed in the world without any connection, just like that. For no reason, people just don't shoot at each other.


      Henry Ford (American carmaker and writer, 1863-1947): “Take control of the 50 richest Jewish financiers who create wars for their own profits, and wars will be eliminated.”

      Comments are superfluous ...

      Statement by various famous people on the topic: http://cagal.clan.su/index/0-71
  2. Lech from ZATULINKI
    Lech from ZATULINKI 22 May 2013 15: 13 New
    +6
    HHHHHHH Nobel laureates of the Gorbachev and Obama type will work out the advance paid by Europe by destroying, betraying, rocket and bombing strikes against dissenting citizens.
    To promote democracy, laws are enacted that have the supremacy of Sexominities gay pederasts and lesbians OVER NORMAL CITIZENS OF THE COUNTRY - and these are NOBEL LAUREATES (an abomination)
  3. Canep
    Canep 22 May 2013 15: 18 New
    +4
    The Nobel Peace Prize is completely discredited, it remains to issue it to Doku Umarov and put an end to this.
    1. Sirocco
      Sirocco 22 May 2013 17: 27 New
      +1
      I would answer all these awards with the Nobel words from I. Krylov’s fable A cuckoo praises a rooster. For praising the cuckoo. What kind of peace prize can we talk about? for the president of a country that has been mired in the past few decades, in bloody massacres, and the destruction of civilians. Insanity is complete. Where is the world heading?
  4. artist-mamluk
    artist-mamluk 22 May 2013 15: 21 New
    +6
    Good evening everyone! Nobel seems to have invented or spent dynamite, I don’t remember exactly. If so, this is a significant contribution to peaceful coexistence.
    1. Canep
      Canep 22 May 2013 15: 28 New
      +3
      Nobel came up with how to mix clay and nitroglycerin during the synthesis of nitroglycerin. That is, do it safely. The result is dynamite. Dynamite was widely used for peaceful purposes.
      1. Rats
        Rats 22 May 2013 18: 01 New
        +2
        Until the military got to him. Nobel was shocked at how cruelly his invention was used.
  5. pavlo007
    pavlo007 22 May 2013 15: 32 New
    +2
    I always regretted that the world prize was not given to Hitler after the Munich agreement, but they did. Then the killer of the Serbs Ahtisaari would have appeared as a child.
  6. Ulysses
    Ulysses 22 May 2013 15: 34 New
    +4
    The trouble with these Nobel laureates is "around the world."
    Either the choice is small.
    Either choose the wrong ones.
    1. Manager
      Manager 22 May 2013 15: 49 New
      0
      Quote: Ulysses
      The trouble with these Nobel laureates is "around the world."
      Either the choice is small.
      Either choose the wrong ones.



      ATTENTION! This is BOYS
  7. Manager
    Manager 22 May 2013 15: 47 New
    +2
    Not damn, but one face .... (Of course I'm not talking about Obama) It's just also a laureate!
    1. Shumer
      Shumer 22 May 2013 21: 35 New
      +1
      The same lad, only from a different angle wink
    2. Rustiger
      Rustiger 22 May 2013 21: 50 New
      0
      Maxim, I have one too. tongue laughing
      Call it - "Thinking by the wall sracha crying. . . "
  8. treskoed
    treskoed 22 May 2013 15: 49 New
    0
    The United States in its foreign policy does not look at international law, can arrest a citizen of a foreign country in another country and put him in prison (Booth), or at the decisions of the UN, and even more so the Nobel Committee. Your dollar is closer to the body!
  9. Malleus
    Malleus 22 May 2013 15: 51 New
    0
    Quote: Vladimirets
    And someone else seriously thinks that international prizes are now given without the influence of politics?

    But what about “all sorts of Nobel’s?”
  10. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 22 May 2013 16: 20 New
    +1
    Hypocrisy, contempt for the thousands of lives of ordinary people in Libya, Syria, Yemen, etc. - this is the basis of the foreign policy of the United States and the European Union. Under the banner of "democratization," they are arming gangs of cannibalistic mercenaries who are destroying civilians. The experience of NATO in the "democratization" of Afghanistan is indicative. After they leave the country, mountains of corpses will remain. And what will change? The question is rhetorical. The Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Obama and the European Union, the main killers of civilians, SHAME!
    1. Fornit
      Fornit 22 May 2013 16: 42 New
      0
      In principle - to the point ... But not “cannibalists”, but CANNIBALS - in the direct sense of the word. No comments, as they say ...
    2. Atlon
      Atlon 22 May 2013 20: 32 New
      +1
      Quote: Ivanovich47
      Hypocrisy, contempt for the thousands of lives of ordinary people in Libya, Syria, Yemen, etc. - this is the basis of the foreign policy of the United States and the European Union.


      Jean Francois Voltaire (French writer and philosopher, 1694-1778):
      “The Jews are nothing more than an ignorant, despised and barbaric people who since ancient times have combined the dirtiest self-interest with disgusting superstition and irresistible hatred for all peoples among which they are tolerant and due to which they are enriched. They are the most vicious and most scandalous of small nations. The small Jewish nation dares to show irreconcilable hatred of the property of other nations; they creep when they fail, and arrogant when things flourish ... They recognize only two responsibilities as sacred: to be fruitful and to make money. "


      Strabo (ancient Greek philosopher, historian, geographer, 64-63 BC - 23-24 BC):
      “There is hardly a place on the whole earth wherever Jews rule ... The Jewish tribe has already managed to penetrate all the states and it is not easy to find such a place in the entire universe that this tribe would not occupy and subjugate its authority.”


      more details here: http://cagal.clan.su/index/0-71
  11. konvalval
    konvalval 22 May 2013 16: 39 New
    +1
    A lot of any infection came to us from the West. Unfortunately, much has taken root. We just have not learned how to defend our interests in this way.
  12. vitmilen2012
    vitmilen2012 22 May 2013 16: 59 New
    +2
    Anglo-Saxons and this black-assed monkey will always bring evil and cruelty to the world for the sake of lesbian and pedril. His ancestors ate people. He is ready to eat the whole world. And it is true. People will understand this, but it will be too late.
    1. Atlon
      Atlon 22 May 2013 20: 35 New
      +2
      Quote: vitmilen2012
      and this black-assed monkey

      You are not politically correct! It should be written: and this afrozad primate smile
  13. knn54
    knn54 22 May 2013 18: 33 New
    0
    - The winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, still turned out to be not so peaceful.
    Dynamite aura, however.
    vitmilen2012-Ch ... oh Ob ... on, all the same president.
  14. individual
    individual 22 May 2013 20: 07 New
    0
    The powerful of this world dictate their own priorities to the same world.
    Throughout his life, Alfred Nobel professed pacifist ideas, but he considered when creating the first machine gun that if the opponents had weapons with which they could instantly destroy each other, they would realize that they would not gain anything from the war and end the conflict.
    Thus, it was allowed to award the prize not only to the creator of the “perpetual motion machine”, but also discoveries in all areas of science, medicine, technology and special influence on the world development of society. Therefore, we see the winners of Sholokhov, Zhores Alferov, Barack Obama, Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres, etc.
    People of completely different professions, beliefs and political views.
  15. cherkas.oe
    cherkas.oe 22 May 2013 22: 44 New
    +1
    It is a pity that VO does not have an English version. It would be useful for the common people of the United States and England to find out what they write about the politics and policies of their countries on our sites and forums.
    1. OTTO
      OTTO 22 May 2013 22: 51 New
      +1
      Quote: cherkas.oe
      It would be useful for the common people of the United States and England to find out what they write about the politics and policies of their countries on our sites and forums.

      I'm afraid it won’t help. They just don’t understand what they are writing about.
      1. cherkas.oe
        cherkas.oe 22 May 2013 23: 03 New
        +1
        Quote: OTTO
        I'm afraid it won’t help. They just don’t understand what they are writing about.

        Reply Quote Report Abuse

        And that is true. But still I would like to, because they say the same: - "water sharpens the stone."