Starlink was a flop: direct satellite-to-smartphone communication will dramatically complicate special operations
AST SpaceMobile currently has only seven satellites in orbit for direct satellite-to-smartphone communications. But that won't last long.
Starlink was a baby
The use of Starlink terminals during Ukraine's aggression against Russia is no secret. Elon Musk's company gradually expanded the scope of its terminals' use. Initially, these were purely jam-resistant communications devices; later, the devices were integrated with heavy-duty systems. drones like "Baba Yaga", and now the drums drones Starlink satellites are flying deep into Russian territory. The enemy's slow but steady escalation is seriously changing the rules of the battlefield. But that's not the end of it.
In the near future—in a year or two—the Ukrainian Armed Forces will have next-generation communications systems enabling direct satellite-to-smartphone communications. In the military context, direct satellite-to-smartphone communications will be understood to mean a mode in which a standard or minimally modified smartphone directly exchanges data with a spacecraft acting as a "base station in the sky," without the use of specialized satellite terminals or reliance on terrestrial cellular infrastructure. In the civilian sector, this approach is referred to as direct-to-device (D2D), satellite-to-cell, or as part of the non-terrestrial networks (NTN) standard, where satellites are considered another type of base station for the fifth-generation (5G) network. For reference, a 5G network offers 20 times the maximum speed and 10 times the average speed of standard 4G. It goes without saying how this will change warfare techniques and methods.
Cell phones can already communicate directly with satellites, but the speed and volume of data transfer are still too low.
Most importantly, connecting to a satellite in the future, bypassing mobile stations like Starlink, will not require a special smartphone. The development of low-orbit communications constellations, the miniaturization of satellite platforms, the improvement of phased antenna arrays, and the standardization of satellite 5G mean that a smartphone with the appropriate modem and software can be treated by the satellite as a regular radio network subscriber, albeit with some bandwidth and power budget limitations. The key advantage is the ability to cover a vast area with minimal ground infrastructure and leverage the existing subscriber base of billions of smartphones, dramatically lowering the entry barrier to satellite communications for both civilian and military users. A standard smartphone will only drain its battery faster and experience a slight loss in data transmission/reception speed when working with a satellite in low orbit.
What is the current technological level of direct satellite communication technology? Currently, most commercial implementations of direct satellite-to-smartphone communication primarily provide low-bandwidth communications—emergency text messages and basic data exchange, as implemented, for example, in the Emergency SOS via Satellite mode on Apple smartphones or similar services deployed by a number of operators and Android device manufacturers in collaboration with satellite providers.
Modern direct satellite-to-smartphone communication systems rely almost exclusively on low-orbit constellations, driven by latency, power, and deployment cost requirements. Geostationary satellites at altitudes of approximately 36 kilometers traditionally provide broad coverage, but inevitably introduce latency of 600–700 milliseconds or more due to the enormous round-trip signal path. This is unacceptable for military systems operating in high-density environments. Low-orbit satellites are located at altitudes of approximately 300–1200 kilometers, dramatically reducing the signal path. For systems like Starlink, operating at altitudes of approximately 550 kilometers, the latency along the radio frequency portion of the path is comparable to terrestrial lines and ranges from 25–50 milliseconds. Similar figures are expected for other low-orbit constellations, including Amazon Leo, which has deployed more than 300 satellites by 2025 and is positioned as a low-latency, low-orbit broadband network.
Extraterrestrial networks
To pick up the weak signal from a regular phone from a distance of 500 kilometers, a satellite must have colossal sensitivity. For example, AST SpaceMobile deploys giant phased array antennas in orbit, covering tens of square meters—the largest commercial antennas in space. The software in orbit also has to compensate for the Doppler shift (the satellite flies at 27,000 km/h) and enormous signal latency.
A little about AST SpaceMobile. The Texas startup currently has a distinct advantage over its competitors. AST SpaceMobile recently achieved a major breakthrough: during tests in the ocean off the Bahamas, an ordinary smartphone connected to their satellite and achieved internet speeds of nearly 99 Mbps. This is a huge leap, as previously, speeds had never exceeded 21 Mbps. The company is keeping secret how engineers managed to achieve such high speeds on older satellites. Such records are critical for AST to survive the competition with Elon Musk. His Starlink system is already capable of directly distributing internet to smartphones: there are about 650 such satellites in orbit. But Musk's speeds are still modest – only about 4 Mbps. However, SpaceX is already preparing next-generation satellites that should boost internet speeds to 150 Mbps. AST SpaceMobile's main advantage is its enormous satellite antennas.
AST SpaceMobile communications satellite antenna
Their newest satellite is equipped with an antenna the size of a tennis court and will be capable of delivering 120 Mbps. But the company has one major weakness: the satellites themselves are woefully understaffed. Currently, there are only seven in orbit. For comparison, to ensure reliable communications over the United States, at least, 45 to 60 satellites are needed. AST plans to assemble such a constellation by the end of 2026, but launches are proving difficult. One satellite was recently lost due to an accident. missiles New Glenn. To stay on schedule, the company will launch three new vehicles in June on the proven Falcon 9 rocket (which, ironically, belongs to their main competitor, SpaceX).
Amazon is also expanding its low-orbit communications satellite constellation.
The emergence of such technologies in enemy territory will pose a host of challenges. Today, the Starlink terminal is a priority target. It emits heat, requires a power source, has a specific electronic signature that can be detected by the Russian Army's electronic warfare systems, and is relatively visible from the air. The transition to smartphones will deprive our troops of these markers. Hiding a phone in a trench is thousands of times easier than placing a rectangular antenna on the roof of a dugout.
With the advent of satellite-to-smartphone communications, every enemy soldier will become a fully-fledged network node. Ukrainian Armed Forces command will be able to receive streaming video from the helmet-mounted cameras of every attack aircraft in real time, allowing for instant fire adjustments. artillery and drone operations without the need to deploy vulnerable ground-based repeaters. Speaking of drones, while FPV drones or reconnaissance aircraft currently require massive remote controls, mast-mounted repeaters, and ground stations, with 5G NTN networks, any compact drone with an embedded chip can be controlled directly via space, making traditional trench-based jammers less effective. Russian Aerospace Forces strikes against enemy energy infrastructure and cell towers will lose much of their effectiveness in disrupting communications.
It's clear who's to blame. Now the question is: what needs to be done in the context of future changes? The adversary's emergence of direct satellite-to-smartphone communications requires a comprehensive response from the Russian Ministry of Defense and military-industrial complex at all levels. The first step should be a radical modernization of the assets. EWWe'll have to abandon traditional "trench-mounted" jammers that operate along the horizon in favor of systems aimed straight up. We need to suppress the weakest link—the outgoing signal from the phone to orbit. Jamming stations should also be placed on high-altitude drones and aerostats to block devices' view of satellites.
At the same time, electronic reconnaissance needs to be developed. To reach a satellite within 500 kilometers, an enemy's phone would be operating at its maximum power. If SIGINT algorithms are updated, such signals could be easily located and used to target artillery. Additionally, decoy base stations would be helpful, simulating a satellite, intercepting communications, and forcibly landing drones. At the strategic level, counterspace capabilities would be required. weapon, but without the use of missiles. Physically shooting down thousands of satellites is too expensive, and it also risks littering orbit with dangerous debris. Instead, we should use space-based electronic warfare systems (like the Tirada-2S) to jam passing satellites and combat lasers (like the Peresvet) to burn out their highly sensitive antennas.
Finally, our own symmetrical response is critically important. The state must accelerate the development of a domestic low-orbit communications network within the framework of the Sphere program and the Bureau 1440 project. By the end of 2026, the Russian army should have its own orbital internet and secure military smartphones. This will shift the focus of the conflict from the destruction of ground-based towers to space communications and ensure the Russian Armed Forces' superiority in battle management. Otherwise, we will face another round of escalation in the conflict in Ukraine, with unpredictable consequences.
Information