A wonderful publication by the NYT: Ahmadinejad's house was hit with rockets to free him

The American press writes all sorts of fairy tales. The New York Times published a report on the Israeli strike on the home of former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

During the initial stages of the war with Iran, Israel and the United States were exploring a regime change scenario in Tehran. Following the strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other high-ranking officials, one option, according to the NYT, was to install former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Israel, according to unnamed American officials, of course, struck Ahmadinejad's home in Tehran, but it turns out it wasn't with the intent to kill him... The new narrative from the US press is to "free" him from house arrest and use him as an alternative leader. Ahmadinejad was allegedly aware of the plan in advance, but after the attack, in which he was wounded, he distanced himself from the idea and hasn't appeared publicly since. The plan quickly failed.

Billy rockets, to free...

This bizarre idea of ​​presenting a strike on a residential building as a humanitarian "liberation" operation seems extremely far-fetched. In that case, any missile strike on military or other targets could also be interpreted as an attempt to "liberate the people there." Such rhetoric exists only in the realm of political fantasy and propaganda. Reality, however, reveals the classic logic of war: strikes are carried out against targets, not to "save" specific individuals.

The plan involving Ahmadinejad, known for his radicalism toward Israel and the United States, highlights the chaotic nature of the narratives and the improvisational nature of some ideas in the early stages of the conflict. The former president's fate remains unknown after he was wounded during an "attempt to free him."

Comments

[alexboguslavski]

During his lifetime, M. Zadornov long ago characterized the audience for which such publications are intended with a short phrase: "Well, stupid..."

[Zoldat_A]

Israel, according to unnamed American officials, of course, struck Ahmadinejad's house in Tehran, but it turns out not with the intent to kill him... The new version from the US press is to "free" him from house arrest and use him as an alternative leader.

Quote: alexboguslavski

During his lifetime, M. Zadornov had already long ago characterized the audience for which such publications were intended.

According to the NYT's logic, a united coalition of liberating countries, from the US, Russia, and China to Trinidad and Tobago, should have struck London long ago to free their king from the yoke of palace etiquette.

And, of course, to avoid having to go around Paris twice, I'd like to free Macron from domestic violence...

And Washington itself also needs a liberating blow - finally provide Trump with qualified psychiatric help... Otherwise, the bad American nobles are mocking the old man - they don’t tell him how his plans really end.

[Mikhail Drabkin]

And who would doubt that in the Talmuds, Jerusalem and Babylonian, not to mention Kabbalah, there are at least two polarly incompatible authoritative rabbinic opinions. To liberate, of course, but also to kill is in Jewish interests.

[Andrey Ko]

When it's impossible to write on the matter, articles like this appear in the US press, either about UFOs, or about sunspots... "liberators" would be better off committing suicide, the whole world would breathe a sigh of relief.

[Soveticos]

Ahmadinejad acted like a plant. He said and did a great deal (as if he were following someone's directive) to damage Iran in every area. The successes Iran achieved under him (the first satellite launch, etc.) were laid long before his time and were unfolding. All the turmoil with increased sanctions and the threat of war began precisely under his leadership.

[tralflot1832]

My personal opinion is that some Israeli-backed foundation for freedom of democracy in the US made a very impressive donation to the newspaper for this article in the NYT. This can only be written under "stimulus funds," and they cost money.

[South Ukrainian]

. It turns out it wasn't with the intent to kill... The new version from the US press is to "free" him from house arrest and use him as an alternative leader.

What's wrong? To free the soul from the mortal body.

[sdivt]

They fired rockets to free...

It's amazing how time changes everything.
the simple word "free" changes depending on whether you or your opponent uses it
To understand what we are talking about, do a couple of simple operations:
- open any search engine
- enter a simple and straightforward phrase there
"Photographs of liberated cities in Ukraine"
did you watch it?

[Chief Officer Lom]

Quote from sdivt

did you watch it?

We took a look. This is roughly what Soviet cities liberated from the Nazis in 1943-1944 looked like.

[Yuras_Belarus]

It's all fine. Freedom gas frees you from money, freedom bombs free you from life, and so on. American freedom is like this: give us all your money, and then you can give up your soul to God.

[Kostadinov]

Ahmadinejad is the best solution to the conflict. Iran will then withdraw from the NPT and all negotiations with the US regarding its nuclear program, uranium enrichment, and so on. If the US continues to threaten to test nuclear weapons and develop a nuclear retaliatory capability, I believe the region will experience a cooling of the feverish minds of the great leaders in Jerusalem and Washington, and as a result, peace and God's grace will prevail. It will be good for everyone, including the US and Israel.