Iran has handed over to the United States a peace plan revised to reflect American wishes.

5 403 24
Iran has handed over to the United States a peace plan revised to reflect American wishes.

Iran has sent the Americans a revised peace plan, taking into account US proposals. The document has already been handed over to Pakistan, which is acting as a mediator. This was reported by the Iranian media. news Tasnim agency.

According to Iran, the US has not completely rejected Iran's 14-point peace plan, and negotiations on it are ongoing. This was stated by Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ismail Baghaei. He stated that the US proposed a number of changes and adjustments, Iran accepted some of them, and the updated plan has already been sent to Pakistan, which will forward it to the US.



Despite the US explicitly stating its rejection of this draft, we received a number of comments and corrections through the Pakistani side. We reviewed the proposals and, as announced yesterday, our views were conveyed to the American side.

Donald Trump, for his part, says the Iranians are "very keen" to sign a peace agreement, but are constantly changing their position, making it so difficult to "make a deal" with them.

One thing I can say: they're dying to sign a deal. But they do, and then they send you a piece of paper that has nothing to do with the deal you made.

It was previously reported that the US President scheduled a meeting with his advisers on the Iranian issue for Tuesday. The option of resuming military operations will likely be discussed, especially since Israel intends to continue bombing.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    18 May 2026 15: 13
    A deal. Ridiculous. What guarantees? None, so what's the point?
    1. +2
      18 May 2026 15: 22
      Trump doesn't need a plan, he needs capitulation.
      1. +1
        18 May 2026 15: 48
        He needs enriched uranium....
      2. +3
        18 May 2026 16: 03
        Quote: knn54
        Trump doesn't need a plan, he needs capitulation.

        Trump also doesn't need a long war in which he loses one plane a day...
    2. +3
      18 May 2026 15: 31
      Quote: novel xnumx
      A deal. Ridiculous. What guarantees? None, so what's the point?

      Guarantees from cowboys?! belay One of my slippers has already torn from laughter...
      1. +3
        18 May 2026 15: 58
        Is the second one even alive? winked ..........
        1. +1
          18 May 2026 16: 06
          Quote: Mouse
          Is the second one even alive? winked ..........

          Why have the second without the first? He'll follow his brother to the burial mound, like they used to bury him in the old days...
          1. +1
            18 May 2026 16: 31
            Skateboard! wassat ...Have fun... wink ...
    3. +1
      18 May 2026 15: 51
      As I understand it, the skirmish will be long...
    4. +2
      18 May 2026 17: 05
      Quote: novel xnumx
      Deal. Funny.

      It's high time Trump started playing with his grandchildren on his golf course. And he forgot what he knew.
      Deal, deal, deal, deal...
      He forgot, and no one will remind him, that the deal requires TWOAnd he can only talk to himself about his victory in Iran - no one will object.
      Consent is a product of complete non-resistance of the parties. (c)
      1. +1
        18 May 2026 17: 26
        And besides, it's a deal with hucksters. And there has to be a contract here.
    5. 0
      18 May 2026 17: 13
      Quote: novel xnumx
      A deal. Ridiculous. What guarantees? None, so what's the point?

      Guarantees? What are you talking about? Guarantees in today's world? Payment by mattress makers for the damages inflicted on Iran would be the most powerful guarantee.
      1. 0
        19 May 2026 15: 05
        The US will not pay any compensation. This is the lot of losers and is considered equivalent to reparations. The US already believes it spent enough on the war to compensate its adversary for its losses. But a deal can only be reached under one condition: that Iran retains the keys to all provisions of the agreement (deal) in the event of its cancellation, which means weapons. The US will never agree to this because it doesn't need a strong and independent Iran, and besides, it plans to violate this agreement (deal) as the next step in achieving its goals in the Middle East. hi
        1. +1
          20 May 2026 13: 23
          Quote: Kmet
          The United States will not pay any compensation.

          I wasn't talking about whether they will or won't pay compensation. Of course not, they won't.
          I said that if they were forced to pay, this in itself would be a serious guarantee of security for Iran in the foreseeable future.
          1. 0
            20 May 2026 13: 37
            From this point of view, there are no disagreements at all.
  2. +2
    18 May 2026 15: 16
    Iran insists that the complete lifting of all sanctions against Iran must be part of America's commitment.
    Iran has previously emphasized that the war must end on all fronts, including Lebanon, and Iran's new text is also based on this position.

    Iran, as a party to the NPT, has every right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes, says Lavrov.
    Iran must enjoy all the rights enjoyed by other NPT parties, without any additional demands or conditions.
    The Bushehr nuclear power plant issue concerns only Russia and Iran, and not any other party, says Lavrov.

    Once Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz, citing absolute sovereignty over the seabed and subsoil of its territorial waters (under the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea), it could declare that all fiber optic cables passing through the waterway are subject to licensing, control, and sovereign fees.
  3. +4
    18 May 2026 15: 42
    In one of the conditions, the "matras" explicitly state that Iran can demand no more than one-third of their frozen, or rather stolen, assets. The Yankees bombed Iran the night before the nuclear talks, when the Iranians were ready to agree on the main issues. What other questions could there be about the negotiations? Time is running out for the American thugs, the carrier strike groups are hogging cash and are at risk of serious damage, and not just to the fan system. I think we should give the Americans the Iranian version and wait for a substantive response, not some new fantasies from Redhead. The Yankees will bomb anyway, one way or another, and the Persians know it. It's a joy to behold the fantastic speed with which they're restoring their potential. I envy them; Iran wouldn't have spent so much time battling the Bandar-logs...
    1. +1
      18 May 2026 22: 12
      Quote: isv000
      I'm envious; Iran wouldn't have spent so much time battling the Bandar-logs...

      So, in fact, no one has won there yet - only statements about the other side's subjugation.
      1. 0
        19 May 2026 13: 10
        Quote: your1970
        So, in fact, no one has won there yet - only statements about the other side's subjugation.

        Yes, the Iranian flag isn't flying over the White House, which is a minus, but the American flag isn't looming over Tehran either, which is a plus. Time flies, Rusty is threatening but hesitant to resume military action, and the Persians have set their own terms and, throughout the "truce," are actively rebuilding their capabilities and preparing for a new phase of war, which can't be said about the mattresses.
        The conclusion is simple: the American coyote growls and howls at the moon, but at the same time, he pees himself. The Iranian lion has silently taken up a defensive position, ready for an attack by coyotes and jackals.
    2. 0
      18 May 2026 23: 46
      Quote: isv000
      Iran wouldn't have been messing around with the Bandar-logs for so long

      Iran fought with Iraq for eight years and in the end, everyone remained the same – that is, in a territorial and political sense, nothing at all changed.
      By the way, even children fought in this war; tankers were burned in batches in the Persian Gulf and poison gas was used.
  4. +1
    18 May 2026 15: 58
    Dealing with peace isn't like carrying sacks! Incidentally, the Chairman hasn't held a Peace Council meeting in a while, and neither has the billion-dollar fee from the members.
    After all, the Peace Council would have ordered Iran to make peace - and that would be it!
    If it doesn't work, then at least the Chairman will still have some money.
  5. +1
    18 May 2026 20: 02
    Quote: gsev
    Trump also doesn't need a long war in which he loses one plane a day...
    And authority too
  6. +1
    18 May 2026 20: 47
    The history of the Indians and their treaties with the government of the then United States is repeating itself.
  7. 0
    19 May 2026 12: 17
    Does the pedophile know that only gangsters make deals? Decent people prefer to sign contracts.