Is Russia far from bankruptcy?

7 770 33
Is Russia far from bankruptcy?

There's one function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation that receives little attention. It collects and aggregates financial statements from enterprises and organizations, producing a kind of consolidated annual financial report for all of Russian industry and trade—all non-financial organizations. In this sense, the head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, Elvira Nabiullina, acts as the "chief accountant of all of Rus'."

These financial statistics allow us to assess the overall financial state of the Russian economy, not based on the principle of “I see it this way,” but objectively, using various means of financial analysis.



Bankruptcy prediction models


As tools for financial analysis of the Russian economy, I chose bankruptcy prediction models—statistical discriminant models that allow one to estimate the probability of a company's failure and bankruptcy. The first such model was developed by Edward Altman, a professor at New York University, back in 1968, and since then they have gained widespread popularity. Many similar models have appeared, including Russian ones, but several of Altman's models, in particular the two-factor and five-factor models, are still widely used.


Professor Edward Altman today

The essence of this approach is that, using data from real companies, half of which are successful and half bankrupt, the most significant financial ratios are developed, which show the greatest differences between successful and bankrupt companies. A statistical analysis is then performed, the "weight" or significance of each ratio is calculated, and a discriminant function equation is developed, along with the critical value, which separates the companies into groups.

The popularity of this method is explained by the fact that it is a very simple calculation, where data is taken from financial statements, the necessary coefficients are calculated and this data is substituted into a formula that produces a single-digit number (account or index) with an unambiguous interpretation.

Although it is the ability of such models to predict bankruptcy that has most often been questioned, the formula for the relationship between different financial ratios is used for various auxiliary purposes: determining the overall financial condition of a company (healthy or bankrupt), judging the dynamics of changes in financial condition based on a comparison of indices over different years, assessing key factors of stability or instability of financial condition, and so on.

While I've never heard of Altman's score being calculated for entire countries, I can't guarantee it hasn't been done. The method itself doesn't prevent it, however. Given the necessary data, the calculation isn't difficult.

I conducted these calculations based on Edwin Altman's two-factor and five-factor models and Richard Taffler's model as an experiment, without any idea of ​​what they would yield. In general, I expected, influenced by numerous publications, that the models would show the Russian economy in poor or marginal condition. But that turned out not to be the case.

Model results


The Central Bank of the Russian Federation's financial statistics contain the necessary indicators for 2022–2024 (i.e., as of January 1, 2025—more recent data is not yet available), which can be used in the corresponding calculation. Russian enterprises and organizations are included in the Statistical Register, which included 2,99 million organizations as of January 1, 2025. However, only 2,2 million enterprises and organizations, or 76,4%, submitted annual financial statements. Given that data from the majority of enterprises is included, the figures reflect the overall state of the economy. Incidentally, You can see the data itself, graphs and coefficients for them, which is very useful.

So, what happened?

First, Edward Altman's "Crash Test" is a two-factor model that analyzes the current liquidity ratio, or the ability to repay short-term debt using working capital, and the proportion of debt in liabilities, or the sources of funds for organizing and operating a business.

The Altman two-factor model index for the Russian economy was:

2022: –4,022
2023: –4,043
2024: –3,803

In this model, if the index is greater than zero, the probability of bankruptcy is greater than 50%, and the higher the positive index, the higher the probability. If the index is less than zero, the probability of bankruptcy is less than 50%, and the lower the negative index, the greater the financial stability. "Deeply negative" represents the minimal risk of financial insolvency.

Second, the Taffler account is more complex, taking into account short-term and long-term debt, profit, revenue, assets, and current assets.

Current assets were calculated as the sum of current financial assets and accounts receivable (money to be received).

So,

2022 - 1,338
2023 - 1,288
2024 - 1,221

In Taffler's model, problems arise when the index is less than 0,3. Such indicators indicate a solid reserve of financial stability.

Okay, let's assume that accounts receivable are "paper" money, or more accurately, claims against counterparties to whom goods and services were delivered. Could there be a default? It could. Let's factor in a discount of 0,6%, or a default of 40% of the accounts receivable, which is a fair amount.

The index turned out to be like this:

2022 - 1,284
2023 - 1,234
2024 - 1,169

The Russian economy does not want to sink, even with a 40% default rate on accounts receivable.

The worst-case scenario, when accounts receivable disappear completely, amounts to 154,1 trillion rubles at the beginning of 2025.

What indices were obtained:

2022 - 1,203
2023 - 1,153
2024 - 1,091

Even in this case, there remains a large reserve of financial stability.

Third. Altman's five-factor model, which also takes into account various factors: assets, profit, equity, debt, and revenue.

Indices for this model:

2022 - 3,044
2023 - 3,098
2024 - 2,9

In this model, a high risk of bankruptcy occurs when the index is less than 1,23; an index between 1,23 and 2,9 represents uncertainty; and an index greater than 2,9 represents absolute financial security. The resulting indices indicate that the risk of mass bankruptcies in the Russian economy is virtually eliminated.

Russia is generally financially stable


The most interesting results emerged when testing the robustness of the Taffler model with discounting and the complete exclusion of accounts receivable. If the stability of the Russian economy rested on "paper" revenue, then the exclusion of accounts receivable should have sent the index into the red. However, the index remained virtually unchanged, neither with discounting nor with the complete exclusion of accounts receivable. This leads to the conclusion that Russian industry is effectively generating revenue and maintaining a return on assets. According to the Central Bank's estimates, return on assets (ROA) was 5,4% in 2022 and 4,6% in 2024—a good figure.

Now, what does the head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation have to do with this? Given that tight monetary policy with a high key rate has forced companies to reduce their use of expensive commercial credit, borrowed funds account for only 25-26% of liabilities.

The second point is return on assets. It's almost 20% for retained earnings, and 5-6% for current profit before taxes. Sales profit is 1,5 times greater than short-term debt. Therefore, the Russian non-financial sector generates sufficient profit to avoid borrowing.

Finally, the profits received, due to severe restrictions on export abroad, are accumulated and invested in Russia, increasing equity capital.

Under these conditions, financial insolvency and bankruptcy are highly unlikely across the economy as a whole. Moreover, unprofitable businesses in Russia are far more likely to close their doors, covering their liabilities by selling their assets, than to go bankrupt.

The conclusion, incidentally, is not obvious: the Russian economy as a whole is financially stable and, due to the policies of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, has increased its stability and transitioned primarily to self-financing, which, in general, is a good thing.

It's important to understand that these are aggregate statistics, combining both profitable and unprofitable companies. However, bankruptcy prediction models show that the problems are localized: specific industries with unfavorable operating conditions (such as coal), industries and companies with unhealthy financial models and various financial management flaws, and specific regions with inherently weak economies exacerbated by poor management.
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    18 May 2026 04: 15
    I don't see any room in the author's reasoning for the self-employed and small businesses...for example, farmers.
    They are like what ...still alive or drowning?
    The author's numbers are very tricky...if you think about them.
    1. +7
      18 May 2026 06: 03
      The author left the answer to the article's title out of brackets.
      And how many predictions there have been since 1999, but for the most part they have not come true, just like the economic forecasts of experts who have been working on pension and army reforms for about 10-15 years, painting a rosy picture for pensioners and the state from 2018 - the year the retirement age is raised.
      At the same time, the number of billionaires in the country is striking against the backdrop of the bankruptcies of many small and medium-sized enterprises in the Russian Federation.
    2. +1
      18 May 2026 08: 05
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      The author's numbers are very tricky...if you think about them.

      In our country, businesses are closing down much more often, and it's the big guys who go bankrupt most often. The author mentions this in passing, but doesn't take it into account. Meanwhile, they make up the bulk of the business. The big guys are clearly more stable than the smaller ones. That's why this whole calculation smells a bit like "an owl and a globe."
    3. +8
      18 May 2026 09: 16
      I don't see any room in the author's reasoning for the self-employed and small businesses...for example, farmers.

      Hmm. It seems that these "small businesses, the self-employed, farmers, and other "unwelcome" people"—according to the leadership and legislators—don't exist in the Russian economy. Have you forgotten how, just recently, a pro-government figure who participated in the adoption of the law banning Telega was asked, "How many people do you think earn money through Telega?" He replied, "I think several tens of thousands..." And he was told, "According to Rosstat, between 1,5 and 2 million Russians are employed through Telega." The official replied, "Seriously? Yes, that's a lot..." And that was it. And he left. They don't even know what's going on in the country, how people live, and how. They care about nothing but their own desires and fulfilling the wishes of their superiors. Catastrophe is inevitable, and it has already begun.
      1. +1
        18 May 2026 16: 18
        And they answered him: “According to Rosstat, between 1,5 and 2 million Russians are employed in Telegram.”

        Small businesses may not formally account for a very large share of the economy, but the social consequences of their problems can be very large, as their share of the population is much larger than that of the economy as a whole.
    4. +4
      18 May 2026 09: 55
      I don't see any room in the author's reasoning for the self-employed and small businesses...for example, farmers.
      They're like, what...are they still alive or are they drowning?
      The author's numbers are very tricky...if you think about them.

      They're drowning. They're leasing land to agricultural holdings at an ever-increasing rate. But agricultural holdings don't know how to make a profit; they only survive on government subsidies. crying
    5. +6
      18 May 2026 10: 40
      Spells about small and medium-sized businesses supposedly "supposed" to pull us out of the financial hole are pure science fiction. Our experts see that in the West, small and medium-sized businesses account for a large percentage of GDP, and we want to do the same here, but somehow, it's not picking up.
      The reason is the population's total poverty, or rather the government policy aimed at it. In the West, 5-8% of income goes toward food, while here it's over 30%. Add to that the exorbitant interest rates on loans that everyone is required to pay, and utilities that are somehow rising at twice the official inflation rate, and we end up with a population without any spare cash; we're living in survival mode. There's no "grass" that small and medium-sized businesses need to feed themselves.
      Regarding the self-employed. They're a complete black hole, freeloaders. I have a "white" salary, and I pay 40-50% in taxes on it. The self-employed pay 5-8%, even less than income tax. It's unclear why they get such benefits, and our experts say they shouldn't be touched until at least 2030.
  2. + 11
    18 May 2026 04: 15
    It's even interesting - did anyone actually read the entire article?
  3. +3
    18 May 2026 04: 20
    Quote: Hagakure
    It's even interesting - did anyone actually read the entire article?

    smile Elections are coming up... I'm now going to count the number of articles, both laudatory and devastating, about the candidates for power... a very interesting activity.
  4. +6
    18 May 2026 04: 22
    This is all well and good, if you don't know that after 2024, 2025 and 2026 happened... And those years were notorious for events in the financial sector. Therefore, the main question, "Is Russia far from bankruptcy?" remains unanswered.
    The state itself can't go bankrupt because it has no loan obligations, but the industrial sector... The most striking example is the construction industry. This year, the largest developer, the Samolet Group, asked the government for a 50 billion ruble soft loan, saying otherwise things would get worse. But they didn't appreciate it and didn't grant it. The growing number of unsold apartments has been a long-standing concern, but the situation isn't improving. Could this lead to default by construction companies? Possibly. Or the state will have to provide subsidies to developers. It's unclear at whose expense...
    1. +3
      18 May 2026 08: 09
      Quote: Puncher
      Or the state will have to provide subsidies to developers. It's unclear at whose expense...

      Hypothetically, instead of subsidies (if they really have to be issued), it would be more profitable for the state to buy apartments from them through a "purchase agreement" and then either sell them or dispose of them.
    2. +1
      18 May 2026 08: 43
      Quote: Puncher
      Could this lead to default by construction companies?

      Well, it won’t be “airplane”, but “Sberstroy” or “Vtbstroy”... But “the casino will still work”...
      1. 0
        18 May 2026 09: 14
        Quote: Doccor18
        Well, it won’t be “airplane”, but “Sberstroy” or “Vtbstroy”... But “the casino will still work”...

        Why did you decide that they need non-core assets?
        1. +1
          18 May 2026 10: 11
          Quote: Puncher
          non-core assets?

          Well, Magnit isn't exactly a VTB-specific brand either...
          1. 0
            18 May 2026 11: 31
            Quote: Doccor18
            Quote: Puncher
            non-core assets?

            Well, Magnit isn't exactly a VTB-specific brand either...

            They owned a share and then sold it, all with the goal of stealing a profitable business from Galitsky. What's the profit in buying a bankrupt developer?
    3. The comment was deleted.
  5. +4
    18 May 2026 04: 55
    Quote: Puncher
    Or the state will have to provide subsidies to developers. It's unclear at whose expense...

    Hmm...I remember they gave bankers fat subsidies to save them. smile ...then the state still had a whole piggy bank and oil prices saved it...now everything will be worse...they will start robbing.
    1. +6
      18 May 2026 05: 29
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Hmm...I remember they gave bankers fat subsidies to save them.

      Otkritie Bank alone was allocated 1,2 trillion. But for some reason, they're in no rush to bail out developers, and a developer default would trigger a banking crisis, as everything there is tied to loans.
      1. +4
        18 May 2026 06: 27
        Basically, we have a financial bubble....
    2. +9
      18 May 2026 06: 26
      The robberies have begun. And they started about ten years ago. Most of these arrests are simply a redirection of funds. Besides, let's remember how they took away Magnit and Wildberries.
      1. -3
        18 May 2026 08: 33
        Wildberries. Who stole it? The owner remains the same.
        1. +3
          18 May 2026 09: 47
          Well, they bought it from Galitsky. Whether he wanted to sell or not. As for Wildberries, the Mirzoyan brothers are now in charge. Although Kim owns 65%, she's essentially a poor relative now, especially since people from Russ have significantly joined the so-called Wildberries, and the direction of its operations is changing.
  6. +1
    18 May 2026 06: 30
    The Central Bank collects and aggregates financial statements from enterprises and organizations, and compiles a kind of consolidated annual financial report for all Russian industry and trade.

    what???????
    We have never submitted any reports to the Central Bank,
    to the tax office and Rosstat only
  7. +6
    18 May 2026 06: 41
    The weak point of these calculations is the initial or source data.
    Very often these data are drawn up and manipulated to please the Tsar.
    It's like being ranked 4th in the world in PPP.
    They take the average temperature in the hospital and run around like crazy.
    While in terms of GDP per capita it is in the fifth ten.
    Yes, there are many such examples, inflated figures
    1. +1
      18 May 2026 08: 29
      Quote: Red Hemi
      The weak point of these calculations is the initial or source data.

      I thought about this too. The output is directly affected by the input. How complete and high-quality was the incoming data? This directly affects the result.
  8. +4
    18 May 2026 06: 58
    Yes, in theory, the economic situation of any country at war is a time bomb.
    And the problems are growing, it’s obvious even to schoolchildren, no matter what the calculations show.
    It's like two plus two makes four.
    At the turn of the 2020s, the financial crisis was stopped by a high key rate.
    After which the economic situation entered a chronic phase.
    Now the fruits are being reaped: enterprises are going into zero or minus mode.
    Next, we expect a series of bankruptcies and a drop in budget revenues.
    The printing press is already turned on to replenish the budget.
    Time will tell what will trigger a massive outflow of deposits and a collapse of the banking system.
    1. 0
      18 May 2026 08: 44
      Quote: Red Hemi
      What will trigger a massive outflow of deposits and a collapse of the banking system?

      This phrase of yours is unclear. A collapse is still a long way off. The banking sector is currently showing excellent results, better than other industries. The main problem for banks is the growing share of bad debts. And this is against the backdrop of overall debt overload. I see a potential danger: a systemic crisis of non-payments due to weakening borrowers.
      1. +1
        18 May 2026 09: 05
        The banking sector has good indicators, again on paper.
        The high key rate has been maintained for almost a year and a half now.
        The money supply in deposits is growing, while bad debts at banks are accumulating.
        It turns out that it doesn't add up.
        What is the reason for the increase in the money supply on deposits?
        It's an obvious bubble.
        We understand that a further rate reduction will lead to an outflow, right?
        Just imagine what will happen if they take at least 20% of the 70 trillion.
        It turns out that there is no need to expect a significant reduction in the rate, which again makes the economic situation quite sad.
        I see a zugzwang variant.
        1. +1
          18 May 2026 10: 55
          Quote: Red Hemi
          The money supply on deposits is growing

          A huge amount of money has indeed accumulated in deposits: attractive interest rates have been "vacuuming up" the excess liquidity. This pent-up wealth is looming over the economy. Now the key rate is being lowered, bank interest rates are falling—and it would seem that people should rush to withdraw their deposits. But where to put the money?

          The stock market is too risky during a war, real estate is oversold and unprofitable—it's a bubble, and Chinese cars at double the price are also unattractive. There are virtually no alternatives. In such conditions, people are willing to hold on to their money, but at a lower interest rate.
  9. 0
    18 May 2026 07: 27
    "I switched mainly to self-financing, which is generally a good thing."
    Self-financing ensures survival without serious development.
    And then, only with highly qualified management in all areas.
    Many will go bankrupt and are already going bankrupt.
    Is this good?
    Perhaps, with the active development of state participation in the economy, with the creation of jobs in large infrastructure projects, this will ensure sustainability.
    But the risks are still very high.
    Especially considering the often low level of competence of managers of unitary enterprises.
  10. +3
    18 May 2026 10: 22
    Recently, the head of government announced a lengthy list of federal subjects whose debts have been written off. These governors spent a significant portion of their operating budgets servicing these entities. It's like being a mortgage slave: all the money you earn is no longer yours, but the bank's. And the apartment you live in is also the bank's.
    Moreover, all this was done brazenly and deliberately. For example, there was Medvedev's friend and protégé Ilya Mikhalchuk. He was the mayor of the "diamond" city of Yakutsk, where, as usual, "his deputies cheated him," and they were jailed for it, while he was appointed governor of the Arkhangelsk region. And the residents of the North had never seen such an impudent pig before or since. After much mischief, he finally signed unprofitable, enslaving "investment programs" with the shady Chubais-Pekhtinskaya subsidiary TGK-2, based in Yaroslavl and owned by completely unknown "Fathers." And when he was finally insistently asked to resign (United Russia received the lowest percentage of votes in the Duma elections), he unexpectedly left to work for... TGK-2!!!!
    Bingo! We did it! Hooray!
    So here's a question for Mishustin: how were all these similar debts, when regions took out loans from commercial banks to implement all sorts of "May decrees" and "garbage reforms" (!?), written off?
    Without annexations and indemnities? Or is the budget or other state (our) money now paid to the banks so they can get off the necks of provincial budgets?
    And if that's the case (and it seems to me that it is), then the question is: wasn't it possible to immediately finance all these so-called "national projects" with state money, in a timely manner, and without commercial markups?
    So, a question for those who have been voting for such crooked and corrupt budgets in the State Duma and regional legislative assemblies for years: were they deceived? Everyone? All at once?
  11. +2
    18 May 2026 12: 56
    So, the main warning signs started after 24. And the author's analysis is from 22 to 24. From it, one can only draw conclusions about the method's effectiveness.
  12. 0
    19 May 2026 02: 18
    A funny calculation, of course. Not only are the data taken from two years ago, when the sun was shining brighter and the economy was more robust, but the argument is also based on "debt has decreased, everyone has switched to self-sufficiency." The analogy is obvious: a person is brought to the hospital with gangrene on his arms and legs, the doctors quickly irrigate all his limbs. In the end, in terms of the size and number of inflammation lesions, everything looks fine, just neat stumps, but in reality, what's left is a "samovar" fit for nothing but bedriddenness. Similarly, the debt burden seems to have decreased, but if you think about it for a moment, something suddenly becomes less cheerful: in reality, this means that growth and development are sharply slowing or disappearing—after all, modern, efficient business models are primarily based on borrowing.
  13. 0
    20 May 2026 12: 10
    There are simpler facts about the sustainability of public finances and sovereign debt. The most important is the public debt-to-GDP ratio. It's believed that 60% is the safe limit, but this isn't entirely true. Italy, Japan, the US, and a number of other countries have debt-to-GDP ratios well below 100%, yet there are no consequences. The reason is the low cost of debt servicing, as in Japan, and the ability to attract external resources to service the debt, as in the US. Or perhaps a combination of these factors. Russia's debt ratio is 20%.
    Another factor is the reserves held by the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank. Our position here is weaker, but still not bad. Especially in terms of the Central Bank's gold and foreign exchange reserves. Even taking into account the stolen assets, we also hold their assets in return. And finally, the third indicator is the stability of the national currency. Comments are completely unnecessary here. So, there's no need to reinvent the wheel—everything has already been done.