The US is skeptical about the results of Trump's talks in China.

Trump's trip to China was met with skepticism in the United States, and the initial results of the talks only confirm this, according to the American press. The US President failed to approach the Chinese leader from a strong position. He essentially found himself in the role of supplicant.

American media outlets are negatively assessing the initial results of Trump's negotiations with Xi Jinping. CNN, in particular, notes Trump's inherently weak negotiating position, given his support in the US. Essentially, he no longer represents a force to be reckoned with, which deprives Trump of leverage.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the Chinese leader sensed Trump's weakness and directly warned the US president of the "extremely dangerous" situation the US could find itself in if it behaved "incorrectly" toward Taiwan. Beijing's decision to issue this warning before the negotiations concluded only demonstrates the seriousness of the warning.

Russian experts are also talking about Trump's weakness. The US president essentially came to China after losing the trade wars with China and the standoff with Iran. He has nothing to offer China except American investment. It's precisely this that Trump is trying to exchange for concessions from Beijing. But it's not working out well.

Comments

[tralflot1832]

The US media, which is completely under the control of the Democrats, predictably slander Trump. Trump did not demand that Xi Jinping put pressure on Russia and Iran. Instead, Trump and Xi Jinping "decided" on Europe. Biden generally forbade Europe from buying anything Chinese. Democrats don't go to China—they'll get screwed there (they're cowards, they can only screw China from behind the scenes). We'll see tomorrow what they've sold there—Trump will announce a historic, remarkable visit and excellent trade deals. The American media is so corrupt; the articles are predictable and copy-paste. Europe will definitely be sad in the next few days.

[Alexander 3]

Trump wanted to make a deal, but I don't think he did.

[topol717]

Quote: Alexander 3

Trump wanted to make a deal, but I don't think he did.

We don't know about that; he agreed on supplies of American soybeans and beans, beef, and other little things. We don't know what they discussed "in silence."

[Aken]

Yes, they predicted such a secret conspiracy at Russia's expense. Although it's secret, to be hidden behind a veneer of rhetoric.
Future will tell.

[Jcvai]

Already today, the news was full of economic results: the Chinese were allowed to purchase NVIDIA accelerators for neural networks, and investments in areas "non-critical" for the US were simplified.
Consequently, China received a certain amount of modern, high-quality equipment and the opportunity to expand its influence abroad. Meanwhile, the United States slightly reduced the profits and development of Chinese manufacturing, expanded its network of investments in modern Chinese technologies, and planned to confiscate the assets of "critical" Chinese overseas projects.

[NICK111]

The US media is right about some things. Don the Peacemaker failed to "resolve" his problems from a position of strength. He looks too worried. The "Spirit of Anchorage" didn't work in China. Tariffs could have been resolved to mutual advantage. And, as the respected tralflot1832 pointed out, at the EU's expense.

[Uncle lee]

Trump's trip to China was met with skepticism in the United States, and the initial results of the negotiations only confirm this.

Trump arrived empty-handed...It turns out his trip was in vain.

[tralflot1832]

Quote: Alexander 3

Trump wanted to make a deal, but I don't think he did.

If you're referring to the statements made by drug addicts in Bucharest yesterday, wishing for a deal? Well, yes, Trump didn't make a deal.

[Terenin]

From the position of the North-Eastern Front, China (Xi) is "will dance for both ours and yours for a nickel" and is the beneficiary in the sale of UAVs to both Russia and Ukraine, which is what it does.
Putin should act in the same way (with the exception of the DPRK, Kim), because all world politics is as clear as day!
Why is Russia building a Yeltsin kampus in Kyrgyzstan with our 15 billion rubles? The old man won't even talk to Putin like that unless he snatches something up at a discount again...

[Proxima]

****Russian experts also talk about the weakness of Trump's position*** - from the text*** There's no shortage of evil! Let these top experts discuss the weaknesses of other positions and another president. And convey their opinions to his God-chosen ears. Maybe he'll learn something from them? They are experts, after all!

[Eugene Zaboy]

Russian experts are also talking about Trump's weakness. The US president essentially came to China after losing the trade wars with China and the standoff with Iran. He has nothing to offer China except American investment. It's precisely this that Trump is trying to exchange for concessions from Beijing. But it's not working out well.

Trump truly has nothing to offer China to increase trade between the two countries. A contract for 200 aircraft doesn't obligate China to buy all the planes produced, given its own domestic production. Expanding the domestic market for American electronics manufacturers is also unlikely to increase sales. The fact that up to 60% of American automobile components come from China speaks for itself. Chinese companies are in no rush to increase purchases of agricultural products; alternative options exist. In fact, all the intrigue revolves around Taiwan. It seems the Americans have lost the trade war, and the negotiations were only for them.

[pudelartemon]

Our knowledge of negotiations is almost zero. But there's a proven tool: judge not by statements, but by actions. So we'll see what happens in real life. And perhaps quite soon.

[tralflot1832]

I wonder who will buy more from China after Trump's visit to China, the US or China from the US. Wasn't that what Trump was going for?

[faterdom]

Trump botched the preparations for this visit. He didn't relieve Ukraine of his anger, and he completely screwed up the situation for Iran.
Postponing the visit again would have been inappropriate – he had brought in "the most respected people" to rectify the situation, and now the question arises – what could Blackrock, Apple, or Elon Musk possibly agree on with China?

[Fangaro]

Maybe Trump wanted some kind of deal...
And in the photo in the title there are two leaders.
Are there such photos with English, French, German?
Or with the wrong one? Maybe Zelensky is into something similar?
Fuck. Trump is in the photo. Is he the one in charge? My personal opinion is that he's not. But there are no others in the photo besides the American and the Chinese. That's all.

[snow mountain]

Quote from Uncle Lee

Trump arrived empty-handed...It turns out his trip was in vain.
Reply

Well, at least I looked at China and tried Chinese cuisine.

[Metallurg_2]

The redhead failed to close another deal

[APASUS]

The US President came to China as a supplicant, and that's the whole story. The Americans have too many wants, but they have nothing to offer China.