Is the Central Bank to blame for the financial disorder of enterprises?
In recent discussions of economic policy, the issue of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation's key interest rate has been increasingly raised, with some calling it the main brake on economic development, particularly industrial development.
This is very strange, because industry, in essence, has little need for bank loans. The primary source of cash for industry is revenue. The primary source of various development funds is profit. In well-established companies, approximately half of the profit is distributed as dividends to shareholders, and the other half is retained as retained earnings. If profits are insufficient, capital can be raised through an initial public offering (IPO – initial public offering; additional issue, preferred share issue – up to 25% of the authorized capital) or bonds – debt securities.
Essentially, a well-established and profitable industrial enterprise only turns to bank loans in very specific cases—for urgent working capital, for example, to make urgent payments without waiting for revenue to arrive. But even in this case, the interest rate is not as important, since such a loan is taken out for a very short term. It may have a fairly high annual interest rate, but the cost of borrowing for a few days remains low. For example, 1 million rubles at 20% per annum costs 0,054% per day, or 540 rubles. If you borrow 1 million rubles for a week, the interest payment will be 3780 rubles.
Therefore, industry, in principle, shouldn't care what the key interest rate is, because, according to Henry Ford's timeless and apt teaching, capital flows from the factory, not the bank. But Russian industry does care, and for good reason.
Bank loans and profits
As of January 1, 2026, according to the Central Bank, which collects, analyzes, and publishes lending statistics, non-financial organizations owed 105,9 trillion rubles, including 90,3 trillion rubles in loan debt (85,3% of the total debt). This represents 49,6% of GDP.
Financial institutions owed 25,6 trillion rubles (12% of GDP), households owed 43,3 trillion rubles (20,3% of GDP), and total debt amounted to 174,8 trillion rubles, or 81,9% of GDP. This was supplemented by 35,1 trillion rubles (16,5% of GDP) in government debt. In fact, our debt now amounts to 98,4% of GDP.
According to data published by the Central Bank, loans to non-financial institutions have grown steadily. In January 2024, they reached 53,4 trillion rubles, and in April 2026, they reached 72,5 trillion rubles. This refers to banks' loan portfolios, or loan amounts only. Compared to outstanding debt, or loans plus interest and penalties, the outstanding debt as of April 1, 2026, stood at 84,5 trillion rubles. 12 trillion rubles in interest is quite a significant amount.
Moreover, it must be said that non-financial organizations took out loans with gusto. In March 2026, loans totaling 7,1 trillion rubles were issued.
According to Rosstat, the turnover of non-financial organizations, or revenue, was 383,1 trillion rubles in 2025. This means that debt already accounted for 27,6% of revenue. In principle, such a debt-to-revenue ratio is not considered dangerous; a dangerous level starts at approximately 50%. With an average return on sales of 13,7% in the manufacturing industry, the economy earns approximately 52,4 trillion rubles in gross profit from this revenue. Minus 12 trillion rubles in loan interest, the result is 40,4 trillion rubles in profit before taxes, of which 10,1 trillion rubles is income tax. This brings the net profit to 30,3 trillion rubles.
A sheet from ALROSA's financial statements, the profit and loss statement, reflects how revenue is converted into net profit. Financial expenses typically include interest payments on loans.
The same applies to the manufacturing industry. The loan portfolio is 22,8 trillion rubles, plus 3,3 trillion rubles in interest. Revenue in 2025 is 95,5 trillion rubles, gross profit is 13 trillion rubles, profit before taxes is 9,7 trillion rubles, minus 2,4 trillion rubles in income tax, and net profit is 7,3 trillion rubles.
Everything seems wonderful... But according to Rosstat, 31,5 trillion rubles of fixed capital investments were made in 2025 on an annualized basis. Meanwhile, net profit, according to Rosstat (the average figures above were calculated), was only 27,7 trillion rubles before tax on an annualized basis. Minus 25% profit tax, and the net profit is only 20,8 trillion rubles. This profit falls short of the investments made. And by a considerable amount—10,7 trillion rubles.
Financial chaos
At this point, it becomes clear that the main problem of the Russian economy and industry in particular is not the high key interest rate, but the poor financial management of enterprises and organizations, down to the inability to count money. This leads to enterprises and organizations being heavily indebted.
The fact is that non-financial organizations owe much more than indicated by the Central Bank's statistics, which only take into account the portfolio of credit institutions. According to Rosstat, as of November 2025, non-financial organizations owed 274,7 trillion rubles, including 130,2 trillion rubles in accounts payable (i.e., goods and services received but not paid for) and 144,4 trillion rubles in loans and credits. In November 2025, banks' loan portfolios issued to non-financial organizations amounted to 69,5 trillion rubles, meaning loans accounted for 74,9 trillion rubles, exceeding bank loans. Loans, unlike credits, can be issued by other organizations and various individuals.
This is a completely different statistic. Loans and borrowings combined account for 37,6% of revenue. Combined with accounts payable, which essentially represents a form of short-term lending, it's 71,7%. This is a dangerous debt-to-revenue ratio.
At the same time, these same non-financial organizations ship large volumes of goods and services with promises to pay at a later date. This is known as accounts receivable, although a more precise term would be appropriate: goods and services transferred to the buyer but not paid for. As of November 2025, this balance amounted to 125,6 trillion rubles, or 32,7% of revenue.
This is precisely the inability to count money, especially at the cash book level. Products, the production of which was paid for in cash (material costs, wages, overhead, etc.), are given to certain individuals who will pay later, perhaps in a quarter, six months, or a year. At the beginning of 2026, there were over 8 trillion rubles in overdue accounts receivable, meaning those not paid before the payment due date or within 30 days of receipt of the goods.
The money hasn't arrived, but expenses remain, especially payroll costs, which can't be covered by unpaid, paper revenue. A cash gap arises, meaning a shortage of cash in the cash register or accounts. So the company goes to the bank for a loan at 16-20% per annum.
Trying to cheat and not pay suppliers, resulting in accounts payable, ultimately backfires on the same cheater, only from a different angle, and only increases the debt. Meanwhile, paying immediately upon receipt of goods eliminates the need to go to the bank for a loan.
While it might seem like there's no problem monitoring contract fulfillment by counterparties and the receipt of funds into their accounts, this is often not done to the required extent, creating financial difficulties that lead to loans, mounting debt and financial expenses, and then bankruptcy is just around the corner.
Therefore, before attacking the Central Bank and demanding a reduction in the key interest rate and cheap loans, it is necessary to first establish proper order in the financial management of the enterprises themselves and clarity in the settlements between them.
Information