Trucks on a low-calorie diet

9 392 35
Trucks on a low-calorie diet


Miracles do not happen


The ideal future would look like this: throw a few logs into the car's firebox and drive hundreds of kilometers. Theoretically, this is only possible with a fantastic efficiency of 95–99%. In practice, humanity has long relied on fossil and non-renewable fuels. Nevertheless, there were times when cars were actually fueled by wood, coal, and even peat. These were attempts to switch vehicles to a low-calorie diet. The results were far from ideal, but for their time, such vehicles were quite functional.



History The development of solid-fuel vehicles began long before the advent of gas generators. In 1801, French engineer Philippe Le Bon patented a design for an engine powered by wood gas, and in 1823, British engineer Samuel Brown built one of the first practical gas engines suitable for running on wood gas. These experiments were largely laboratory experiments, but they laid the foundation for further development of the technology.

It is important to clarify here the difference between a steam engine and a gas generator engine.


Steam engine

A steam engine is a power plant in which water is heated in a boiler to steam, which is then forced under pressure into cylinders to perform mechanical work. The first full-scale steam engine on wheels was a French cart. artillery officer Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot - Fardier de Cugnot, built in 1770. Eighteen years later, James Watt created a double-acting steam engine.

A gas generator is designed differently. It's not an engine per se, but an auxiliary device that produces combustible gas through the incomplete combustion of solid fuel in a limited oxygen supply. This gas is then fed into a conventional carbureted internal combustion engine.


Fardier de Cugnot

A steam engine completely replaces an internal combustion engine, while a gas generator merely adapts an existing engine to alternative fuels. A steam engine delivers tremendous torque at low speeds, requires no traditional gearbox, and can start under load. A gas generator, by contrast, consumes up to a third of the engine's power and requires a standard transmission. A steam boiler requires 30–40 minutes to reach operating temperature, while a gas generator requires 15–20 minutes to ignite.

A steam engine consumes water, while a gas generator does not. A steam engine can run on large logs without careful fuel preparation, while a gas generator requires small logs or charcoal. Furthermore, a steam power plant is significantly heavier and significantly reduces its load-bearing capacity. Gas generators are cheaper, easier to manufacture, and can be installed on standard chassis without major modifications. However, both required constant attention: steam engines suffered from scale buildup and seal wear, while gas generators suffered from resinous deposits and clogged filters.

The full history of gas-powered vehicles begins in 1901, when French engineer Georges Imbert demonstrated the first functional gas-powered vehicle. His unit, mounted in the rear of the chassis, converted wood logs into combustible gas through incomplete combustion. The resulting mixture of carbon monoxide, hydrogen, methane, and nitrogen, with a calorific value of approximately 5 MJ/m3, was fed into the carburetor of a conventional engine.

In the 1920s, Imbert refined the design and created the compact Imbert Generator System, suitable for installation in virtually any vehicle. By 1930, more than 50 companies in 17 countries had acquired licenses for it. France became one of the first centers of mass adoption. Peugeot produced a producer gas version of the 202 model, and Panhard-Levassor created the three-axle Panhard K110 truck, capable of running on charcoal and anthracite. By 1940, there were more than 40 producer gas vehicles in France, and by 1944, amid strict gasoline rationing, their number had reached 120. Vehicles on Berliet GDR and Renault AGK chassis were particularly popular, used for urban transportation, where low speed was not a critical factor.



In the face of an oil shortage, the Germans placed particular hopes on gas generators

Germany, aware of its dependence on oil imports, pursued a targeted policy of replacing liquid fuels with producer gas as early as the 1930s. The Reichskraftwirtschaftsgesetz (Reichskraftwirtschaftsgesetz), adopted in 1930, provided incentives for owners of such vehicles and subsidies for manufacturers. As a result, by the start of World War II, more than 300 producer gas vehicles were in operation in Germany.

Körting AG developed the Körting Kraftgas Generator series of units for medium-duty trucks, while Ernst-Werke produced systems for light trucks and passenger cars. Mercedes-Benz equipped the L 3500 model with a gas generator, while Opel equipped the Blitz 3,6-36. During the war, such vehicles were used in rear and support services, saving gasoline for combat units. Projects were even developed to install gas generators on Tanks The Pz.Kpfw. IV was designed for rear-line use, but it never went into production. The Austrian company Saurer produced the Saurer 5 GF truck, which ran on coal and anthracite, and was in demand in mountainous regions.


Schulfahrzeug on the Pz.Kpfw.I Ausf.A chassis with gas generator equipment

The British took a different approach, relying on steam-powered vehicles. One of the most successful vehicles was the Sentinel S4 dump truck, produced since 1933. It ran on coal and carried up to 6 tons of cargo. The more powerful Sentinel DG6, designed for 10 tons, was used in mines and construction sites. Foden Trucks produced steam trucks, including the C-type, which was used in rural areas where gasoline remained expensive. In the 1930s, there were approximately 50 steam trucks in Britain.


The British steamboat Sentinel S4. There's no mention of gas generation here. But what thrust!

In Italy, which relied on expensive imported fuel, gas generators became widespread between 1940 and 1945. Fiat produced a version of the 626GL truck powered by wood and coal, while Lancia offered the 3Ro, which ran on coke and anthracite.

In Japan, which faced a catastrophic oil shortage after 1943, gas generators became virtually the only way to maintain road transport. Toyota created a gas generator version of the GB truck, powered by charcoal and rice husk briquettes. Nissan and Isuzu produced similar vehicles. In the Philippines, Burma, and Malaya, the Japanese army even installed field gas generators on captured Ford, Chevrolet, and Bedford chassis. These improvised solutions were unreliable, but with gasoline completely absent, there was no other option. By 1945, the total number of gas generator vehicles worldwide was estimated at over a million, making this technology one of the most widely used alternatives in the history of motor transport.

At the same time, solid-fuel steam vehicles were also developing abroad. In France, the Serpollet company was producing steam vehicles as early as the early 20th century, in Germany, Hanomag steam trucks operated in the Ruhr mines until the mid-1930s, and in the United States, there were truck versions of the Stanley Steamer and White Steamer. However, by the 1920s, steam vehicles had almost disappeared in the United States, giving way to vehicles powered by internal combustion engines, while in Great Britain, the Sentinel and Foden continued to be produced until the early 1950s.

Decisions of the Soviet Union


In the USSR, work on gas-powered vehicles began in 1928, when, at the request of NATI, engineer B.S. Stechkin began creating the first domestic unit. It could run on wood logs 10–12 cm long and 3–8 cm in diameter. The first prototype was mounted on an AMO-F-15 chassis and tested in 1930. The vehicle reached a speed of 25 km/h and consumed approximately 1,8 kg of wood per kilometer. Following the testing, it was decided to produce a production vehicle.


ZIS-13

In 1935, the Stalin Plant began producing the ZIS-13, a gas generator version of the ZIS-5. The NAMI-G13 unit, developed under the supervision of engineer L.N. Gakkel, was mounted to the right of the cab and could hold up to 100 kg of wood logs. When switching to generator gas, engine power dropped from 73 to 46 hp, and the maximum speed dropped from 60 to 40 km/h. The cruising range on a single load was approximately 40 km, after which additional loading and filter cleaning were required. Despite its shortcomings, the ZIS-13 was used in the forestry industry and on rural routes.

In 1939, it was replaced by the ZIS-21, featuring the more advanced NAMI-G21 gasifier. Thanks to an improved gasification process, power increased to 52 hp, top speed to 45 km/h, fuel consumption decreased to 1,5 kg of wood per kilometer, and range on a single load increased to 80 km. The vehicle could run not only on logs but also on charcoal, peat briquettes, and brown coal, although coal required additional gas purification. A total of approximately 8000 ZIS-21s were produced, making it one of the most widely produced generator-gas trucks in history.




In 1938, the GAZ-42, a light gas generator truck based on the GAZ-AA, was introduced. Its NAMI-G42 unit was more compact and ran on wood logs and coal. The GAZ-MM engine's power was reduced from 50 to 35 hp, and its payload capacity was reduced from 1500 to 1000 kg. Its key feature was its dual fuel system: in addition to the gas generator, the truck retained a 40-liter gas tank and could switch between the two fuel types. This made it particularly suitable for areas with unstable supply chains. A total of approximately 5000 vehicles were produced, and a small series of the GAZ-42T, a modification for peat operation, was manufactured for peat-producing regions.

There were also experimental gas generator versions of the GAZ-03-30 bus and an ambulance based on the GAZ-M1, but they never went into production. In 1944, the experimental GAZ-44 was created based on the new GAZ-51, but it never reached mass production.


The GAZ-42 could run on anthracite.

Gas generator trucks played a special role in Leningrad during the siege. According to the historian's memoirs, by 1943–1944, up to 80 percent of Leningrad's urban transportation was powered by gas generators, and these "gas generators" were used even during the most difficult days of the siege. It was thanks to these gas generator trucks that Leningrad's transportation system continued to function even during the fatal conditions of the siege. Drivers operating these trucks spent 12 hours at the wheel in the bitter cold, making five to seven trips a day across the icy Lake Ladoga to the famous Road of Life. Moreover, these gas generator drivers received the same meager rations as ordinary siege survivors, meaning they worked in conditions of hunger and cold, risking their lives to save the lives of others.

Drivers on the Road of Life became true heroes, and history has preserved the names of some of them. Soviet driver Maxim Tverdokhleb accomplished his feat just before New Year's: on December 31, 1941, for the sake of hungry Leningrad children, he performed a true New Year's miracle by transporting a whole truckload of tangerines along the Road of Life. This event demonstrates that drivers weren't simply following orders from their superiors, but imbued their work with personal meaning and compassion.

Among the drivers working on the Road of Life was Ivan Nikonovich Pozdeev, driving his GAZ-44 with a gas generator. The job of a gas generator driver was truly hellish. Drivers complained that the gas generator-powered vehicles smoked and puffed, required constant monitoring, and often broke down due to various malfunctions. Documents from that period indicate that as early as October 1942, 25 gas generator vehicles required repairs, but only 10 were completed, indicating a severe shortage of qualified repairmen and spare parts.

After the war, attempts were made to create gas-powered trucks on heavier chassis. The UralZIS-352, developed in 1949 on the UralZIS-5 timber truck, was equipped with a NAMI-G5 unit and could run on wood, charcoal, and brown coal from the Kansk-Achinsk basin. When running on generator gas, the engine produced 75 hp, compared to 95 hp on gasoline. The payload capacity was reduced from 3500 to 2500 kg, and the speed from 55 to 35 km/h.

Among the unusual projects, the ZIS-16G bus, developed in 1940 on the basis of the ZIS-16 city bus, is worth noting. Its power unit was mounted on the rear overhang of the vehicle and ran on charcoal, but due to a loss of power, the bus could not cope with inclines and was deemed unsuitable for regular service. Another experimental vehicle was the Ya-11 tractor on the YaG-6 chassis, developed in 1942 for towing heavy artillery. However, due to insufficient reliability, it also did not enter production. In the post-war period, gas generator versions of the GAZ-63 and ZIS-150 were considered, but as fuel shortages eased, these efforts were abandoned.

NAMI-012


One of the most ambitious and technically innovative Soviet projects was the NAMI-012 steam truck, whose development began in 1947 at the request of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs. The project was initiated by the Main Directorate of Camps, which needed transport for logging in remote areas of Siberia and the Far North, where the delivery of liquid fuel was extremely difficult. Unlike gas generators, which required small fuel and frequent cleaning, the steam truck could operate on large logs up to 50 cm long and up to 20 cm in diameter, cut directly on site.


NAMI-012 and YaAZ-200

The British Sentinel S4 steam dump truck, purchased in the USSR for testing, served as the basis, but the Soviet vehicle differed significantly from the prototype. The chassis was borrowed from the YaAZ-200 timber truck, and the layout was modified: a three-seat cabin replaced the diesel engine, followed by a medium-pressure water-tube boiler, a wood bin, a steam engine, and a water tank.

The boiler was designed for a pressure of 14 atmospheres and steam superheating to 350°C. The time it took to reach operating pressure was 30–35 minutes, which was considered good. The vertical, three-cylinder, double-acting steam engine produced 90 hp at 300 rpm and 2100 Nm of torque at low speeds—approximately five times more than the YaAZ-204 diesel engine of a similar class. It was this enormous torque that defined the NAMI-012's main advantage: the vehicle could start in any gear, confidently climb hills without shifting, and navigate off-road terrain with minimal slippage.


The NAMI-012's gearbox featured direct and downshifting gears, and the clutch design allowed for downshifting without coming to a complete stop—a highly advanced solution for its time. The gearbox function was partially replaced by a steam valve timing system: the driver could select four levels of cylinder filling with steam when driving forward and one level when driving in reverse.

The automatic fuel feed was particularly innovative: the wood, under its own weight, fell from the hoppers onto the grate as it burned, and the combustion intensity was regulated by air supply from the cabin. The fuel supply was sufficient for 60–80 km, with a fuel consumption of 120–150 kg per 100 km. The main drawback remained the weight of the unit—approximately 3500 kg, of which over 1100 kg was the boiler. This reduced the load-bearing capacity and impaired unladen handling.


The first NAMI-012 prototype, built in 1949, revealed a number of problems during testing: smoke during ignition, boiler vibration on uneven roads, and insufficient steam line seals. After further development, two improved prototypes were built—a flatbed truck and a logging tractor-trailer—which were sent to state testing in the Murmansk region in 1951.

In temperatures down to -40°C, the trucks traveled thousands of kilometers on dirt roads, clearings, and frozen rivers, transporting timber and building materials. The commission noted their excellent off-road performance when loaded, their ability to climb grades of up to 12°C, and their speed of up to 35 km/h on the highway. Acceleration to 20 km/h took 18 seconds, compared to 22 for the diesel YaAZ-204. In logging operations, transportation costs were 40% lower than those of gasoline trucks, thanks to virtually free fuel. However, heating the boiler took at least half an hour, and the weight of the powertrain limited the payload to 4 tons, compared to 6 tons for its diesel counterpart.

Based on the testing results, development of an all-wheel drive version of the NAMI-018 began. The front axle was borrowed from an experimental timber truck, a two-speed transfer case was added to the transmission, and the steam engine's power was increased to 110 hp and torque to 2500 N m. Testing showed that the NAMI-018's off-road capability was comparable to the best diesel timber trucks of its time. However, the all-wheel drive version was even more expensive to produce, and the increased weight further reduced the payload. Attempts were also made to create a version with a fuel oil furnace, but they failed to ensure stable combustion under the vibrations of a vehicle. This version remained at the prototype stage.




By 1953, work on steam-powered trucks was discontinued. The decision was driven not so much by technical shortcomings as by a changing economic situation: the development of new oil fields in Tatarstan and Bashkortostan dramatically increased liquid fuel production and made steam and gas-powered vehicles economically unviable.

The disappearance of solid-fuel vehicles from the market was due to a combination of factors. The primary factor was the sharp decline in the price of liquid fuels in the post-war period. The discovery of gigantic oil fields in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela, and the USSR led to increased production and lower prices. While global oil production was approximately 360 million tons per year in 1945, by 1960 it exceeded 1 billion tons. Gasoline ceased to be scarce and became a cheap, abundant resource, and with it, the economic basis for the development of solid-fuel vehicles disappeared.

Yet, the accumulated experience was not lost. In developing countries, gas generators were used as early as the 1960s and 1970s. In India, Pakistan, Burma, and Ceylon, converted trucks ran on charcoal and coconut coir until the 1980s. In Cuba, gas generators were used in trucks and buses until the 1970s, until the USSR established petroleum product supplies. In South Africa, such vehicles were used until the early 1970s. In the 1960s and 1970s, China produced gas generators for Dongfeng trucks that ran on charcoal and anthracite, especially in rural areas where gasoline remained scarce for a long time.

Engineering advances from the gasification era have also found application in related fields. Biomass gasification technology formed the basis for industrial plants producing syngas from wood waste. Wood pyrolysis, used in the Imbert and NAMI gasifiers, became the basis for modern biochar production technologies, which are in demand in the metallurgy and energy industries.

The Soviet experience in creating the NAMI-012 steam truck also left its mark. The idea of ​​automatically feeding large logs into the boiler was used in the design of steam plants for river vessels and icebreakers operating in Siberian basins. The shutoff switching system was further developed in industrial steam plants, where smooth power regulation was required. The NAMI-012 design team subsequently contributed to the development of other types of automotive equipment: experience designing high-load steam engines was useful in the development of torque converters and fluid couplings for heavy trucks, and the development of boiler units was used in the creation of heating systems for buses and special vehicles.

Ultimately, despite the dead-end nature of this branch of automotive evolution, steam and gas generator power plants proved to be in demand in their time and left behind a rich technical legacy.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 10
    12 May 2026 05: 06
    The article is interesting and informative!
    Thanks to the author!
    I was a kid, and some of the grown-up neighbors worked as drivers. And I remember very well how we kids would climb all over the Studebaker and the car that ran on wood, i.e., a gas generator.
    I don't remember, maybe it was one driver who worked on different cars, or maybe there were two. But what's interesting is that we guys already knew back then that the installation was called gas generator!
    Where did this knowledge come from? Most likely from the drivers.
    1. +6
      12 May 2026 06: 54
      Quote: your vsr 66-67
      and some of the adult neighbors worked as drivers.

      The word "chauffeur" comes from the French word "chauffeur." Literally translated, this word means "fireman" or "stoker." hi
    2. +5
      12 May 2026 09: 46
      I remember a car like that too. In the early sixties there was another one like that driving around the village. But it didn't last long.
      If I'm not mistaken GAZ AA.
      Thanks for the article. Although I already wrote about this topic on VO.
  2. +3
    12 May 2026 05: 08
    In total, about 8000 ZIS-21s were produced, making it one of the most widely produced gas generator trucks in history.
    I was riding in one of these in the back of a truck, Zvenigorodka - Iman...
  3. BAI
    +5
    12 May 2026 06: 19
    In the 70s, remnants of piles of wood for gas-powered vehicles were still found in Siberia. Gas stations, so to speak.
    Steam tractors (German) were used in the Russian Empire on Ukrainian territory (photo not loading)
    1. +2
      12 May 2026 14: 16
      In the 70s, remnants of piles of firewood for gas-generator vehicles could still be found in Siberia.


      Specifically for gas generators? - As I understand it, it's not logs that are needed, but rather wood chips of the appropriate size.
      1. +3
        12 May 2026 16: 04
        I read somewhere that pine cones were the ideal fuel for gas generators. They're biomass, standardized in size, and plentiful in the forest.
        1. +2
          12 May 2026 21: 07
          Quote: Not the fighter
          I read somewhere that the ideal fuel for gas generator machines were pine cones.

          That's unlikely. It's more of a myth. Resin clogs filters and pipes, and the buds are very resinous. This was mentioned in the article.
  4. +3
    12 May 2026 08: 34
    A gas generator truck is driving. The driver is steering. And who is throwing wood into the firebox?

    So, besides a driver, a stoker is also needed?
    1. + 11
      12 May 2026 09: 35
      A gas generator truck is driving. The driver is steering. And who is throwing wood into the firebox?

      It's a discrete system. Charge it and go. When the cycle is over, recharge it.
    2. Owl
      +4
      12 May 2026 09: 47
      "automatic fuel supply: the wood, under its own weight, fell from the bunkers onto the grate as it burned out, and the intensity of combustion was regulated by the air supply from the cabin." If there was no automatic supply, there were short stops for loading.
      1. +3
        12 May 2026 12: 19
        You're talking about a steam boiler. A gas generator works differently. Dear Kuznets 55, he described it this way.
    3. +6
      12 May 2026 09: 50
      No, a stoker wasn't needed. Firewood was loaded into the boiler, lit, and everything was tightly closed. When the firewood burned without oxygen, carbon monoxide was released, which was fed into the engine cylinders. The engine was started on gasoline, then switched to gas.
      After some time, the boiler had to be emptied of the remains and loaded with firewood again. Everything repeated itself.
  5. +3
    12 May 2026 12: 02
    The title image was clearly created by AI. See the belt drive plus a few other less obvious flaws.
    1. +6
      12 May 2026 12: 28
      Quote: Sensor
      The title image was clearly created by AI. See the belt drive plus a few other less obvious flaws.
      If you are writing about a drawing of a steam engine, then I support this opinion - some kind of crap has been drawn.
  6. +5
    12 May 2026 12: 15
    The steam boiler needs 30–40 minutes to reach operating mode.....
    This applies to solid-fuel steam boilers. If, for example, they use kerosene, the picture is entirely different. Take, for example, the Doble brothers' steam cars, produced at the end of the steam engine era:

    ..... In the 1920s, the Doble Model E drove like no other car. Even its sound was unique. When the driver turned the ignition key, a mighty sigh emanated from under the hood, followed by a muffled, guttural growl. However, after half a minute, the sound faded. When the car started moving, it made no sound other than the soft swish of the tires. The usual nervous rhythm of gear shifting, the accompanying whine of the engine—none of this was present, since the Model E lacked a gearbox and clutch. The driver simply opened the throttle (the handle was mounted directly on the steering wheel), and the car accelerated freely, effortlessly. Speed ​​increased without any hiccups or dips. Meanwhile, the car, with its four-meter wheelbase and luxurious body from the famous carriage workshop of Walter M. Murphy, weighed approximately 2,5 tons.
    .....In early 1924, the Model E was tested in New York City under the direction of the Automobile Club of America. First, in the dead of winter, the car was left overnight in a garage. When it was rolled outside, it sat for 90 minutes in the freezing cold. Then the ignition was turned on, and the steam boiler roared to life. The working pressure was reached in 23 secondsThe car took off with four passengers on board, accelerating to 40 mph (64 km/h) in 12,5 seconds.
    ___After some refinement during factory testing, the 75-horsepower car accelerated to 160 km/h (100 mph), and 0-120 km/h (75 mph) took just 10 seconds. The engine's power was so strong that if you opened the throttle sharply, the roadster would lift its front wheels like a modern dragster. Another advantage was its range: with a 110-liter fuel tank, the heavy steam engine could travel 2400 km (1,500 mi). Despite all its advantages, the car had one major drawback: the price. The chassis alone cost 30 times more than a base Ford T, plus the cost of the body...
    .....Virtually every component was selected based on the principle of the best possible quality: electrics from Bosch, a chrome-nickel steel frame (like a Rolls-Royce), an ivory-inlaid steering wheel, and leaf springs made of polished chrome-vanadium steel. To make 16-inch brake drums, the factory started with a 40-kilogram steel blank, which, after forging, was ground on a lathe until a six-kilogram drum remained. 34 kilograms of very expensive shavings were left on the floor.
    P.S.
    Speaking of vehicle reliability, there is one car that has traveled 965,000 km without a single breakdown, requiring only system cleaning. Another interesting fact is that these cars are road legal in the state of California, as their emissions meet the strictest safety standards, and their dynamic performance allows them to easily outperform more modern road users.
    1. +2
      12 May 2026 15: 08
      I read about these steam engines as a kid. They're wonderful things. And there are videos on YouTube too. On the road, this car still doesn't stand out in any way. The performance is quite good.
    2. +4
      12 May 2026 17: 07
      Great comment, more like this.
      And the picture—a diagram of a steam engine—is a shameful mistake by the author (or was it intentional?). He disregards the readers, slipping a terrible gaffe into a technical article. Although the topic is interesting, well-developed, and the other illustrations are spot on.
      1. +2
        12 May 2026 18: 39
        Quote: balabol
        The diagram of the steam engine is a shameful mistake....
        Unfortunately, there's a mistake (not exact) in my comment. By the time I noticed it, I had already passed the time to correct it.
        Quote: Bad_gr
        Another advantage of the car was its range: with a 110-liter tank, the heavy steam engine could travel 2400 km.
        This mileage is based on water reserves, but in terms of fuel, it is 900 km.
    3. 0
      12 May 2026 22: 01
      Quote: Bad_gr
      When they rolled it outside, it stood for 90 minutes in the freezing cold. Then they turned on the ignition, and the steam boiler woke up and roared.

      I just don't understand how they dealt with the danger of unfreezing the system. recourse
      Did you pour antifreeze into the boiler? But that turns it into a consumable.
      1. 0
        12 May 2026 23: 38
        Quote from cpls22
        I just don't understand how they dealt with the danger of unfreezing the system.
        Did you pour antifreeze into the boiler? But that turns it into a consumable.
        This machine's boiler is a 150-meter-long tube coiled into a coil: water enters one end, and superheated steam enters the other. Perhaps the tube isn't as sensitive to the expansion of frozen water, or is the boiler itself well-insulated, like a thermos? And unlike competitors' products, this boiler is also non-explosive.
        1. 0
          13 May 2026 00: 35
          Quote: Bad_gr
          Maybe the tube is not so sensitive to the expansion of frozen water.

          I'm not sure, but it's a fact that a small volume of water in a tube will freeze faster.
          Heating pipes burst easily. Besides, the water in this coil must come from some kind of receiver or tank. Maybe it's the pipe material, more flexible? But what kind of frosts are there in New York? In the taiga, during logging, that's definitely a danger.
          1. +2
            13 May 2026 00: 50
            Quote from cpls22
            But what frosts are there in New York?...
            I doubt the owner of this car, which at the time cost an order of magnitude more than a Ford, would have kept it out in the cold for hours. Its place is in a warm garage. He drove it off somewhere, showed off, and then back into the garage.
  7. +8
    12 May 2026 12: 16
    I doubt this topic will become relevant again in light of the events in the Middle East. Perhaps we'll see the emergence of aircraft with gas generator engines. laughing
    1. +3
      12 May 2026 12: 22
      Maybe we'll see planes with gas generator engines appearing.

      Wood dust turbojets


      On July 29, an explosion occurred at the Horizon Biofuels plant in Fremont, Nebraska, USA, killing three people – a plant employee and two girls under 12 years old who were waiting for his shift to end.

      https://atexcenter.ru/baza-znaniy/vzryv-na-zavode-horizon-biofuels-v-ssha-tragediya-prichiny-i-uroki-dlya-promyshlennoj-bezopasnosti/
  8. +3
    12 May 2026 13: 31
    There are plenty of videos of steam trucks in England on banned YouTube. They added coal with a shovel. The boiler was small. It could have been a co-worker, or the driver.
  9. +5
    12 May 2026 14: 54
    Thanks to the author for the article. My grandfather worked in logging at a gas generator plant. Harvesting birch logs for him was quite a job (they had to be short, small in diameter, and dry). There's no mention of North Korea, although gas generator-powered trucks are still in use there.
    1. +2
      12 May 2026 16: 04
      Preparing birch logs for it is quite a job (they need to be short, small in diameter, and dry)

      As expected, anthracite is the most saturated fuel for gas-powered vehicles.
      Gas generator cars G. G. Tokarev 1955 https://electrotransport.ru/index.php?topic=1643.0
  10. +3
    12 May 2026 16: 50
    Interesting article, gasogens were popular in Siberia until the 70s.
  11. +3
    12 May 2026 17: 12
    It is necessary to add the most modern steam Lowa from the GDR, which worked until the 70s.
  12. 0
    13 May 2026 00: 36
    I would like the details:
    Its installation, located at the rear of the chassis, converted wood logs into flammable gas through incomplete combustion.
    What remained of the wood as a result of incomplete combustion? Was the heat from incomplete combustion used in any way?
    The car could reach speeds of up to 25 km/h and consumed about 1,8 kg of firewood per kilometer.

    The automatic fuel supply was especially original.
    How did everything work on vehicles without automatic fuel supply? Did the driver get out every two kilometers, clear out the spent wood, and add more firewood?
  13. +3
    16 May 2026 14: 57
    In the USSR, work on gas-generator vehicles began in 1928, when, on assignment from NATI, engineer B.S. Stechkin began creating the first domestic unit. It could run on 10–12 cm long wood logs.
    I wonder where the author got this information?
    The three-volume History of NAMI and the well-known book by Andrey Karaev on the history of NAMI (chronicle with photos) do not mention this.
    A Google search for "Stechkin gas generator" doesn't yield anything.
    As far as I remember, Stechkin worked in the aircraft engine department; in 30, the IAM was formed on its basis.
    The following information can be found on the Internet:
    Incidentally, the first domestic gas generator vehicle was based on the F15 chassis (though it was the Italian 15Ter). Back in 1923, a Leningrad professor V. S. Naumov He developed a direct-process charcoal gasification unit, the U-1, and in 1927, a modified and lightweight U-2 unit was mounted on a FIAT-15Ter truck. In 1928, this vehicle completed a 1310-km run along the Leningrad-Moscow-Leningrad route.
    Source: AMO-F15, familiar and unfamiliar Mikhail Sokolov.

    The gas generator subdepartment was organized at NAMI in March 1930 on the basis of the Wood Institute under the leadership of prof. V.P. Vetchinkina.
  14. +3
    16 May 2026 15: 56
    In 1935, the Stalin Plant began producing the ZIS-13, a gas generator version of the ZIS-5. The NAMI-G13 unit, developed under the supervision of engineer L.N. Gakkel
    Here again comes the question where the author found this???
    All sources say that the gas generator unit for the ZIS-13 was designed by a NATI engineer A. Peltzer. He is a well-known person; for example, he designed a gas generator for the GAZ-A passenger car, which was tested but never put into production.

    Regarding the gas generator L. N. Gakkel then the AI ​​gives out a single link... to this very publication by Fedorov
    The Internet is truly the easiest way to find unreliable information. laughing
  15. 0
    9 July 2026 11: 28
    Perhaps, in the current conditions, someone would be interested in an electric generator coupled with a gas generator that charges batteries.
  16. 0
    11 July 2026 09: 30
    And then, lo and behold, you'll even have internet powered by firewood... Wow? A couple of logs and you'll be in front of your screen all evening...