"I'm back!" - although not the Terminator at all

15 859 26
"I'm back!" - although not the Terminator at all

Arnold Schwarzenegger's classic "I'll be back" from The Terminator comes to mind again. This time, it really does seem much more serious—if not for a couple of nuances.

This isn't just about returning the B-1B to service, it's about returning it with necromantic special effects.



US Air Force commanders may have once considered retiring the B-1B Lancer completely, but now the variable-sweep wing bomber will serve for a long time to come: Neither commanders nor the aircraft themselves have any real choice. Years of failures in developing new aircraft have led to a desperate effort to extend the life of the old ones. And not just extend them…


The Air Force is even returning a previously retired aircraft to service. The B-1B, once a "boneyard" in the Arizona desert, has now returned to service after meticulous restoration and maintenance.

The U.S. Air Force announced that B-1B bomber serial number 86-0115, formerly known as "Rage," has departed Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, after nearly two years of maintenance work aimed at returning it to service. The work was conducted at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma City, where the aircraft departed on April 22 of this year.


A B-1B bomber taxis to the runway at Tinker Air Force Base.


On February 26, 2026, the B-1B bomber made its bare metal test flight at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma.

The B-1B Lancer was returned to combat readiness after being stored under the Type 2000 program at the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona. The aircraft originally arrived at the "boneyard" in 2021, as one of 17 B-1Bs retired at that time and sent there to reduce the fleet from 62 to 45 aircraft, improve overall readiness, and redirect resources toward replacing the type with B-21 Raider bombers.

But something went wrong: the B-21 was delayed somewhat, and the B-1B's retirement had to be reconsidered. So much so that the aircraft from Davis-Monthan returned to service in 2024.


A B-1B takes off for a test flight at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, February 26, 2026.


On February 26, 2026, a B-1B bomber made a test flight at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma.

Well, that's not particularly surprising—at least for us. While Russia doesn't have deserts where mothballed aircraft are stored, we're no strangers to returning old aircraft to service while awaiting new ones.

In the US, there's a whole program called the Type 2000, which maintains aircraft so they can be easily returned to service if needed—especially to replace potential combat losses or accidents in the future. 86-0115 was one of four B-1Bs placed in such storage with the possibility of being restored.

According to the Air Force, more than 200 military and civilian personnel from the 567th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron participated in the work, working in shifts. More than 500 components were replaced during the overhaul of the aircraft's systems and structure.


April 15, 2026, at Tinker Air Force Base, during maintenance on a B-1B bomber. The repaint followed test flights and preparations for the aircraft's return to service.

[
A technician from the Air Force Logistics Complex Oklahoma City moves scaffolding next to a B-1B aircraft in the paint shop at Tinker Air Force Base./ center]
Before returning to service, pilots from Tinker's 10th Flight Test Squadron flew the aircraft over Oklahoma, as seen in the photo at the beginning of this article. These checkout flights were used to verify the systems' functionality and performance, after which the B-1B was declared fully combat-ready and repainted.

The B-1B is currently at Dyess Air Force Base in Texas, where it has rejoined the 7th Bomb Wing under a new designation, "Apocalypse II," and an updated nose cone. This aircraft is also the wing's flagship, and therefore carries the markings of the 9th and 28th Bomb Squadrons.

[Center]
The Apocalypse II nose section is dedicated to the crew of the B-24J Liberator Apocalypse bomber who served in World War II. It marked the final stage of the restoration of 86-0115 and its return to service.

The return of the decommissioned bomber to service means the U.S. Air Force is once again in compliance with the strict legislative requirements established by Congress to maintain its fleet of 45 B-1B aircraft. The service announced that aircraft 86-0115 was restored to replace aircraft 86-0126, which was undergoing major repairs at Boeing in Palmdale, California.

"The analysis showed that refurbishing the aircraft at AMARG could be accomplished more quickly, at a lower cost and with less risk than continuing the Boeing repair project," the Air Force said at the time.


A B-1B Lancer bomber on the paint job site at Tinker Air Force Base.


A newly painted B-1B bomber is seen at Tinker Air Force Base on April 15, 2026, during maintenance.

In 2024, a B-1B nicknamed "Lancelot," also previously decommissioned and stored under the Type 2000 program, was delivered to Tinker AFB for final restoration work before returning to service. It replaced another aircraft written off after a catastrophic engine fire during routine maintenance at Dyess AFB two years earlier.

This has been happening in the US for quite some time now—and not just with Lancers. Other bombers have also been brought back into service from mothballing.

In 2019, a B-52 "Wise Guy" landed at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana to replace the bomber that crashed and burned at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam three years earlier.

Previously, the B-52 "Ghost Rider" was returned to service at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, in 2015, replacing a B-52 that was retired after an electrical fire during routine maintenance in 2014.


The 567th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron poses with a B-1B at Tinker Air Force Base. The squadron completed maintenance work to return the aircraft to operational status.

The return of 86-0115 to service is especially urgent now that the B-1B's service life has been officially extended for another ten years. Although the Lancer was previously scheduled to be retired by 2030, its ability (and, most importantly, the airframe's durability and strength) to carry particularly heavy loads has allowed it to extend its service life until at least 2037.


A B-1B takes off from Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, April 22, 2026, after completing maintenance at the base that returned the aircraft to operational status.


A B-1B takes off from Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, after completing maintenance to restore the aircraft's flight characteristics.

At the same time, it's not as if the B-1B is some kind of flying archaism. The bomber's relevance continues to be maintained with all efforts, including the installation of new types of weapons. Not long ago, images of a B-1B with a hypersonic rocket air-launched AGM-183 Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW).


A still image of a B-1B bomber carrying an AGM-183 Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW) hypersonic air-launched missile.

The Air Force now also wants to develop an improved version of the ARRW, as well as a separate air-launched ballistic missile (ALBM). Once again, the B-1B will likely participate in these developments.


According to fiscal year 2027 budget documents, the Air Force intends to invest $342 million to modernize the remaining 44 B-1B aircraft (one of the Congressionally mandated aircraft is currently undergoing lengthy maintenance and is not in service) between 2027 and 2031.

"This request provides the necessary funding to modernize the platform, ensuring its combat capability and relevance until 2037," the document says.

Although the B-1B's service life was expected to be approaching the end of its lifespan, demand for this bomber remains strong, particularly due to the recent challenging missions during Operation Furious Wind. Given this, the return of the upgraded Apocalypse II will help maintain readiness for future missions, should they arise.

In reality, these ongoing returns are a desperate measure to maintain their strategic forces in good condition, somewhat similar to what happened in our country. When UAC's protracted work on the PAK DA project and its significant expenditures without visible results exhausted the country's leadership's patience, the decision was made to resume production of the Tu-160.

Things are moving much more slowly than with the Americans, but the end result will be new aircraft, not aging veterans, as the youngest B-1B is 38 years old. That's a long time for an aircraft, no matter how you tighten its screws.

The US Air Force's Trishkin coat continues to be adorned with new patches, but Mr. Trump's latest "mega-creative" operation will likely show how effective this will be.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    8 May 2026 05: 13
    Unfortunately, we haven't figured this out yet, and there's no serial production of the standardized Tu-22MM and Tu-160M. I'd also add the Su-34M attack aircraft with its larger wing, or better yet, the Tu-16MM, which could be upgraded to a strategic bomber...
    And it's time to think about the Il-102 am
    1. + 12
      8 May 2026 05: 55
      Quote: air wolf
      There is no serial production of the unified Tu-22MM and Tu-160M, and I would add the Su-34M attack aircraft with a larger wing area, or better yet, the Tu-16MM, which can be upgraded to a strategic...

      Where are you all of this? serially "Are you suggesting we "launch" it? We don't have that many aircraft factories or that many qualified specialists. So the wording
      Quote: air wolf
      Unfortunately, we didn't understand this.
      - this is Spanish cringe! wassat
    2. +8
      8 May 2026 07: 34
      great joke)
      For some reason, the U-2 is not mentioned.
    3. -1
      20 May 2026 22: 40
      What kind of attack aircraft is this Su-34M? IL-102? What are you even talking about?
  2. +9
    8 May 2026 05: 34
    The Yankees are doing well; all their decommissioned aircraft are shipped to Arizona and returned to service as needed. But we don't have Arizona; we only have Anadyr, where all our active strategic aviation is somehow concentrated. But it's not as comfortable there as the desert... But it's far away.
    1. + 12
      8 May 2026 06: 00
      Yes, Arizona has zero humidity and a complete lack of precipitation, as well as a complete absence of insects, rodents, and other creatures that could ruin things. True, the ultraviolet rays are blazing, causing all plastics and rubber bands exposed to sunlight to wear out within a year or two. But this is known, so it's clear in advance what will need replacing if necessary.
      1. +6
        8 May 2026 12: 38
        Quote: Nagan
        True, the ultraviolet rays are incredibly strong, causing all plastics and rubber parts exposed to sunlight to wear out within a year or two. But this is known, so it's clear in advance what will need replacing if necessary.

        If I remember correctly, to protect against the sun, the preservation procedure involves either covering all the glass with covers or applying a special polymer coating, sometimes covering the entire aircraft.
    2. +8
      8 May 2026 06: 09
      Quote: Yuri L
      Good thing for the Yankees, all their decommissioned aircraft are sent to Arizona and returned to service as needed.

      Even in Soviet times, when we had the Karakum, Kyzylkum, and Sary-Ishik-Otrau deserts, we didn’t have such a practice...
      1. AVP
        +3
        8 May 2026 11: 02
        Because even a mothballed vehicle requires some kind of care and maintenance. I'm sure the Americans do the same.
        1. +5
          8 May 2026 12: 46
          Quote: AVP
          because even a preserved perelatz requires some kind of supervision and maintenance.

          Without which, they quickly turn into scrap metal. Here's how the entire fleet of MiG-27s stored at bases was destroyed in just a couple of years:
          MiG-27s were sent to storage bases in Lipetsk, Tambov, Step, Chebenki, Slavgorod, and Taldykorgan. Most of the aircraft had considerable service life, but in storage, they quickly lost not only their combat effectiveness but also their airworthiness—their components were stripped from the "live" aircraft, which were handed over for storage with a full set of components. There was no one and nothing to carry out the maintenance prescribed by the regulations with periodic checks of systems, engine acceleration and flight tests (Even combat units lacked funding and fuel).
          (…)
          It only took a few years for this once impressive force to be reduced to crumbs. Weather and time had taken their toll on the unattended aircraft: the scorching sun in summer, rain and snow in winter (the covers were the first to be stolen by the thrifty locals) quickly exhausted their storage life, many components were corroded, lubrication hadn't been renewed for years, not to mention the fact that most of the aircraft were incomplete (and spare parts for the decommissioned aircraft were scrapped).
          © Markovsky V.Yu. Fighter-bomber MiG-27.
  3. + 13
    8 May 2026 05: 59
    one of 17 B-1Bs retired at the time and sent there to reduce the fleet from 62 to 45 aircraft, improve overall combat readiness and redirect resources to replacing the type with B-21 Raider bombers.
    But something went wrong: the B-21 was delayed somewhat, and the B-1B's retirement had to be reconsidered. So much so that the aircraft from Davis-Monthan returned to service in 2024.

    1. 17 B-1Bs in storage - this is more than all the Tu-160s in Russia.Russian Aerospace Forces - 5 Tu-160, 7 modernized Tu-160 and 2 Tu-160M ​​(under testing) as of 2026[95]" (c) Wiki
    request
    2. B-21 was somewhat delayed in transit, so much so that by 2024 there were already three of them, and in 2026 there were apparently six. The B-21's first flight took place on November 10, 2023. By September 2024, two other B-21s were undergoing ground testing. (c)Viki
    request
    1. +2
      8 May 2026 22: 54
      Quote: Wildcat
      Tu160 in the Russian Federation "Russian Aerospace Forces - 5 Tu-160, 7 Tu-160 modernized and 2 Tu-160M ​​(under testing) as of 2026 [95]" (c) Wiki

      There were 17 in stock, a couple were lost, a couple of new ones were built (two completed center sections and at least one from scratch). So there should be more. Not many, but more. But Vika is such a source...
      The B-1B modernization is a necessary measure, but a suitable payload has been found for them. New anti-aircraft guns. Furthermore, it has been decided to expand the B-52 fleet by returning some aircraft from storage to service. The modernization program is quite extensive: replacing the engines with new, fuel-efficient ones from a business jet, a new active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar with a synthetic aperture, a new avionics suite, and even a new payload—a new, stealthy cruise missile. So everything is in order, and they have a source for modernization.
      Looking at the US Strategic Nuclear Forces modernization program, it's even more interesting: the entire Minuteman III fleet is set to be modernized and reloaded with heavy missiles once again, extending their service life until... 2050 (previously, plans had been to extend their service life until 2040), while 450 new Sentinel ICBM launch sites will be deployed. However, their nuclear warhead capacity will be much greater, ranging from 6 to 10, according to various sources. And the Minuteman IIIs can also load nuclear warheads to their original capacity (they previously carried 3 nuclear warheads each). Combined with the modernization of the B-1B and B-52 (and the expansion of their fleets) and the production of the new B-21s... this will be not just a significant, but a multiple increase in the number of nuclear warheads on strategic carriers.
      But with the production of new SSBNs to replace the old Ohio-class submarines, there will be no serious delays and the pace of rearmament will be slow. The new SSBNs will carry fewer missiles (16 instead of 24), and there will be fewer SSNs themselves. But overall, the potential of the US strategic nuclear forces after such rearmament and modernization will increase by at least 3-4 times. In other words, the goal is to achieve a potential greater than that of Russia and China combined. Or even greater than all other nuclear powers. This is the beginning of a new nuclear arms race, which will be responded to by at least China and Russia. France is also announcing an increase in its nuclear warheads and a desire to acquire land-based IRBMs or even ICBMs. Germany also wants something, but is embarrassed to admit it. England is having problems with its own production, but is also struggling. Even Turkey has shown a model of a promising ICBM. New times, new trends.
  4. + 14
    8 May 2026 07: 34
    I can just smell the decaying West from the Soviet wall newspapers. They're standing on the edge of the abyss, no doubt about it.
    1. + 11
      8 May 2026 08: 51
      Well, yes. They stand on the edge of an abyss into which someone has already stepped and is falling at an accelerating rate.
    2. 0
      9 May 2026 19: 51
      Quote: squid
      stand on the edge of the abyss

      Yeah. And the dollar is going to die soon. For as long as I can remember, it's been dying, but it just won't die. )))
  5. +2
    8 May 2026 07: 36
    It's like a long-term storage area for equipment in the desert. We had a reserve storage area right in the unit.
  6. 0
    8 May 2026 08: 41
    I am interested in the logistics of delivering the plane to the intensive care center.
    Who knows, please tell me.
  7. +5
    8 May 2026 08: 50
    It would be strange if, in the context of the nascent arms race with China, the Americans did not return the good B1B from storage.
    In reality, these ongoing returns are a desperate measure to maintain their strategic forces in good condition, somewhat similar to what happened in our country. When UAC's protracted work on the PAK DA project and its significant expenditures without visible results exhausted the country's leadership's patience, the decision was made to resume production of the Tu-160.

    The results so far aren't exactly encouraging. They're apparently cutting back on the Osetra, as there hasn't been any news about the Tu-160 for a while.
  8. 0
    8 May 2026 08: 58
    Although Russia doesn't have deserts where mothballed aircraft are stored, we're no stranger to returning old machines to service while awaiting new ones.

    I wonder what the author meant? They tried to introduce the MiG-27 into service in the 90s, but the wing sweep adjustment units rotted.
  9. +6
    8 May 2026 09: 34
    I wouldn’t call the place where they keep such planes a “cemetery.”
    1. +6
      8 May 2026 12: 52
      Quote from AdAstra
      I wouldn’t call the place where they keep such planes a “cemetery.”

      And this is the American name. smile Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, or more precisely its 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group, is unofficially known as The Boneyard.
      Although it would be more correct to say - the lair of a techno-necromancer. laughing
  10. +9
    8 May 2026 11: 02
    What was the B-1 remembered for?
    -It became a good argument for accelerating the creation of our Tu-160.
    -It was considered a serious component in the American nuclear triad.
    - It was subject to at least three attempts to remove it from service as ineffective and obsolete.
    But... traditional American pragmatism prevailed (triumphed). Look how prudent these Americans are, even in the area of ​​armaments!
    If there is a reason to return the equipment to service, they will do it without unnecessary fussing and wrangling.
    And most importantly, they have something to return and from where.
    1. +3
      8 May 2026 14: 54
      Quote: U-58
      And most importantly, they have something to return and from where.

      There is something, there is where it comes from, there is someone to give it to, and there is something to use it for...
  11. +1
    8 May 2026 16: 00
    It makes sense. As I once watched on a show, companies operating around this storage facility are constantly engaged in the preservation, restoration, repair, replacement, production of replicas, and other activities related to various equipment.
  12. +2
    8 May 2026 17: 36
    "In the US, there's a whole Type 2000 program, under which aircraft are maintained in such a way that they can be easily returned to service if needed." I wonder if we have a similar program. By the way, the author mentions a critical age of 30+ years for aircraft. What about the Tu-22 and early Tu-160?
  13. 0
    9 May 2026 14: 00
    An interesting fact: the Americans used B-1Bs in Afghanistan for direct support of troops.
    Why did the Americans get to this point?
    - the ability to patrol for a long time in the combat zone (if aerial refueling is used, the duration is actually limited by crew fatigue), which results in the ability to quickly respond to an air strike at the request of ground forces
    - a wide range of guided and unguided weapons that can be loaded onto a bomber before takeoff, which allows the use, depending on the situation, of the type (cluster, high-explosive aerial bombs, satellite and/or laser guidance) and caliber (from 500 to 2000 pounds) of weapons that are needed at the moment to support ground troops and allows minimizing the risk of damage to one's own troops.
    - target designation (input of target coordinates) for guided weapons can be given directly in flight.