Import Substitution in Defense: The First Domestic Photolithograph, the Progress STP-350

29 671 134
Import Substitution in Defense: The First Domestic Photolithograph, the Progress STP-350


Why do we need 350 nm?


Let's start with a very good one news At the end of last year, the first domestic photolithograph, the Progress STP-350, went on sale. Anyone with nearly 400 million rubles can become the proud owner of this machine. It's versatile—it produces microchips using a 350-nanometer process, uses a solid-state laser instead of an outdated mercury lamp, and produces up to 63 silicon wafers per hour, with wafer diameters ranging from 150 to 200 mm.



But first, let's explain what a technological marvel this photolithograph is. Simply put, the printing of microchips can be likened to a novella. The process can be compared to drawing in sand, only instead of a rod, there's a beam of light, and instead of sand, there's a silicon wafer coated with a special photoresist, or a substance that reacts to light. The photolithograph projects an incredibly fine pattern of the future chip—with millions of transistors and connections—through a stencil (mask) onto the wafer's surface. Where the light hits, the photoresist changes its properties, and then the "unnecessary" parts are chemically removed (etched), leaving a precise pattern on the crystal. This process is repeated dozens of times, layer after layer, forming the three-dimensional structure of the chip.

The more accurately a photolithograph can focus a beam, the smaller the transistors can be made, meaning more computing elements can fit on a single chip, making the processor more powerful, faster, and more energy-efficient. This is why the race for ever-smaller process technology is, in essence, a race for ever-more-sophisticated photolithographs.

Although the 350-nanometer process isn't the most advanced in the world, to put it mildly, such photolithographs present plenty of challenges. First, focusing accuracy: the excimer laser beam (248 nm) must maintain focus with a deviation of no more than 0,5 microns across the entire wafer, otherwise the pattern will "float." Another headache is mask cleanliness: any speck of dust on the photomask is replicated across thousands of chips. Third, there's the requirement for photoresist uniformity, which must be applied in a layer less than a micron with minimal spread. Finally, there's diffraction: light "bleeds" beyond the edges of the stencil, so engineers pre-distort the mask pattern to ensure it remains accurate after passing through the optics. This partly explains why the Progress STP-350 photolithograph costs almost 400 million rubles.


Enough physics – let's move on to lyrics. A little storiesThe first 350-nanometer process technologies appeared in industry in the mid-1990s. These were the Pentium Pro and MMX. Russia, strictly speaking, has narrowed the gap with global leaders in photolithograph production from 40-50 years to just 30. We can also produce chips on imported photolithographs, but they're not the most advanced—only those using a 180-nanometer process. Some experts claim that photolithographs capable of 65-nanometer processes exist, but this isn't certain. This is why Russia's most advanced server microprocessor, the Irtysh, has to be manufactured in China, as its process requires 12-nanometer equipment.


A reasonable question: why should Russia invest in an outdated 350-nm process when it can build advanced 120-, 65-, and even 12-nm photolithographs? Firstly, it takes much longer, and the microchips are needed here and now. Secondly, the prospects for creating a completely domestic modern photolithograph are so vague that they are practically science fiction. And microchips using the 350-nm process are the foundation of the country's defense capability. No more and no less. Microchips of this class are not susceptible to ionizing radiation, unlike thin 5-7-nm transistors.

At 350 nm, it's easier to create a triple-redundant microcircuit that's resistant to single-point failures. Military equipment requires operation under extreme conditions, including temperature fluctuations, vibration, and EMI pulses. 350 nm transistors are larger and thicker, meaning they're more reliable. Combat control systems, drives, and power supplies require high-voltage components (up to 100 V), which cannot be produced using delicate processes. 350 nm is ideal for this. In the civilian sector, 350 nm is essential—it's essential for automotive electronics, medical equipment, communications, and optoelectronics. Ultimately, the 350 nm process is a mature, time-tested technology that continues to be widely used in applications that don't require minimal transistor size but do require reliability, high voltage, and analog precision.

Success Story


The history of the Progress STP-350 began even before the SVO – in 2021. In the fall, the Ministry of Industry and Trade announced two tenders for the development of photolithographic equipment, marking the beginning of a large-scale state import substitution program in the field of microelectronic engineering.

The first competition was aimed at creating a system for projective transfer of an integrated circuit topological image onto a wafer (colloquially referred to as a stepper) with a resolution of up to 130 nanometers, with the potential for further upgrades to 65 nanometers. The second competition involved developing equipment with a resolution of 350 nanometers, which was more conservative in terms of technological standards.

The second case concerns the future Progress. According to documents published during the tender process, the contract for the development of 350-nanometer lithography equipment was valued at 7,9 billion rubles. The sole bidder was the Zelenograd Nanotechnology Center (ZNTC), which submitted a bid for 7,51 billion rubles. Located in Moscow's Zelenograd high-tech cluster, ZNTC at the time had nearly all the expertise to develop such projects.

Almost, but not all. They didn't know how to make photolithographs in metal—they lacked the experience. As it turned out, the missing experience was found in Belarus, at the Planar enterprise, which had retained a huge amount of accumulated potential from the Soviet era. Planar's history is quite interesting and instructive, but it requires a separate narrative. Suffice it to mention the 500-nm process technology, which Planar's photolithographers mastered in 1992. The EM-5784 machine, which appeared in 2017, became a distant prototype for the Russian Progress. As soon as it became clear that domestic microelectronics could not cope without Belarus, work began on upgrading the EM-5784 to the EM-5884. It was this photolithograph that became the immediate basis for the Progress STP-350. Speaking about the connection between the Progress STP-350 and the EM-5884, experts point out that the first lithograph was created on the basis of the second, with certain adaptations and localization of components for Russian use.


The dimensions of the Russian Progress system are impressive. The photolithograph is a 3,5-ton unit, 2,5 meters high, and 2 meters wide. This primary optical-mechanical unit contains a laser objective with an operating wavelength of 365 nanometers. A slightly smaller control unit is added to the main unit. As mentioned above, the main advantage of the Progress system is its use of a solid-state laser instead of a mercury lamp. This ensures significantly higher brightness and coherence of the beam, allowing for higher resolution and image transfer accuracy. Furthermore, solid-state lasers have a significantly longer service life (up to ten thousand hours) compared to mercury lamps, which require replacement every few years. Furthermore, the laser in the photolithograph system offers energy efficiency, advanced optical systems, and materials for photomasks.

Anyone interested in purchasing a Progress STP-350 will have to wait a year and a half, after providing a deposit equal to half the cost of the photolithograph. The first buyer of the unit was Otraslevye Resheniya (Industry Solutions), a company from the Element Group. The completed photolithograph was shipped to the customer at the end of last year, and it has already undergone the necessary adaptation process for production. For reference, foreign equivalents are two to three times more expensive than the Progress.

Work on the 350-nanometer process, which is entirely domestic, has been completed. The Zelenograd Nanotechnology Center's resources are now focused on 130 nanometers. But that's a slightly different story and a different kind of progress.
134 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 31
    7 May 2026 05: 44
    I was pleased with the author's article. hi ...there is a launch pad for releasing our own chips.
    Now the main thing is not to ruin this good cause with all sorts of ridiculous decisions.
    1. +8
      8 May 2026 10: 15
      Now the main thing is not to ruin this good cause with all sorts of ridiculous decisions.

      Translated into Russian, great and mighty: The main thing is not to hand this matter over to effective managers, capable of ruining everything...
    2. +1
      14 May 2026 20: 52
      It's not Olympic gold, but it's definitely a place in the finals. Now everyone's talking about reaching the 130th standard in 2026, and that's the next step. Greetings, collective West...
  2. + 15
    7 May 2026 05: 46
    Wonderful. Respect to our specialists!
  3. +1
    7 May 2026 05: 50
    A reasonable question: why should Russia invest in an outdated 350-nm process technology if it can build advanced 120-, 65-, and even 12-nm photolithographs?

    Why would a photolithograph be needed without existing infrastructure, the production of highly pure materials, sophisticated technological equipment, and qualified personnel?
    Industry needs to be restored.
    The situation is similar to this: They manufactured a 1943-model cartridge, but the rifles rusted, and they can't buy new ones. Moreover, there's no one to fire these cartridges.
    1. -7
      7 May 2026 06: 06
      Quote: Sensor
      A reasonable question: why should Russia invest in an outdated 350-nm process technology if it can build advanced 120-, 65-, and even 12-nm photolithographs?

      Why would a photolithograph be needed without existing infrastructure, the production of highly pure materials, sophisticated technological equipment, and qualified personnel?
      Industry needs to be restored.
      The situation is similar to this: They manufactured a 1943-model cartridge, but the rifles rusted, and they can't buy new ones. Moreover, there's no one to fire these cartridges.

      Have you seen rusty rifles in the army?
      1. + 17
        7 May 2026 07: 04
        Have you seen rusty rifles in the army?

        Analogies aren't your thing. I saw process lines completely dismantled and ready for the dump, the remains of a nitrogen station—bare walls, all the metal removed, a row of power line masts, judging by the 110 kV insulators, without wires.
    2. + 20
      7 May 2026 06: 07
      So that's part of recovery: getting back to what we once could do, so we can build on that foundation and develop into what we can today. The usual consequences of "why build your own when you can buy from the owners on credit?"
      After all, the choice isn’t “1943 cartridges” or “2020 cartridges”, the choice is either “1943” or nothing
      1. -2
        7 May 2026 07: 09
        Recovery must begin with the production of "simple" semiconductor devices, diodes and transistors, and not alloy ones, but Schottky and MOSFET.
        1. +4
          7 May 2026 19: 47
          How does one interfere with the other? You might as well start with vacuum tubes and only then move on to transistors.
          In addition, the Ministry of Industry and Trade has placed numerous orders for the development and production of pure chemicals.
          1. 0
            7 May 2026 19: 59
            You might as well start with radio tubes.

            It's possible to use vacuum tubes, too, although the vacuum hygiene requirements for semiconductor devices are much stricter. One micron-sized speck of dust, not visible under every microscope, minus one chip per wafer.
            1. +2
              7 May 2026 22: 00
              Quote: Sensor
              It's also possible with radio tubes

              Maybe we should move on and start with crystal radio receivers? The simplest discrete radio components are either manufactured (for use in specific equipment and under specific conditions) or easily purchased. Photolithography is a more serious proposition, and we have the expertise, so why not give it a try?
              1. +5
                8 May 2026 04: 48
                crystal radio receivers?

                Signal drums are just the thing.
                Photolithography is a more serious application and I have the skills, so why not give it a try?

                Will we see results from its work soon? When is the first pilot batch of chips planned? By 30, with regular delays. They built the unit and said it was good enough to take a break. Such systems degrade without regular maintenance, and if there's no workload, there's no maintenance.
                How much effort was wasted in the creation of the Vostochny Cosmodrome and other ambitious projects will never be told in our lifetime.
                1. +3
                  8 May 2026 09: 01
                  Quote: Sensor
                  Will we see results from his work soon? When is the first pilot batch of chips planned for 30, with regular delays?

                  The process technology has been refined, and similar microchips are being produced in the country. A promising start.
                  Quote: Sensor
                  They made the unit and said that it was good and you could relax.

                  You invented it yourself.
                  Quote: Sensor
                  How much effort was wasted in the creation of the Vostochny Cosmodrome and other ambitious projects will never be told in our lifetime.

                  Water does not flow under a lying stone.
      2. +6
        7 May 2026 15: 32
        Restoration must begin with the arrest of the thieves!
        1. +1
          7 May 2026 15: 44
          It would be nice, but utopian. After decades of corruption and nepotism, if everyone involved were jailed, there would be no one left to govern. And there's no adequate successor.
          Yes, just by subjective calculations, you can get a minus of 70-80% of the population that grew up and was raised in this, unfortunately, habitual system.
          After all, can any of the people living in modern society honestly say that among his acquaintances there is no one who has never stolen anything in his life, or given or received bribes?..
          And for many, this is the norm: stealing something from work, even if it's just a small thing, appropriating something forgotten on the street/in public transport, giving a bribe to speed up/get forgiveness when dealing with officials...
          And how do you think they'll behave if they're given the power to steal practically with impunity? After all, frankly, a significant portion of those who resent the system are subconsciously more dissatisfied with the fact that they're not the ones "at the trough." First, we need to raise and educate at least a couple of generations with proper morals.
          1. +5
            7 May 2026 19: 44
            Quote: JcVai
            First, we need to raise and educate at least a couple of generations with the right morals.

            They stole, they steal, and they will continue to steal. It's desirable to have managers who won't just pocket money but also implement assigned projects. But at a premium. Then we'll live a normal life.
            1. +4
              8 May 2026 07: 53
              Yes, it is a centuries-old scourge.
              But what really stuck in my mind about the “old Union” was that all of this was there too, but in smaller quantities, because, and this is key, such behavior was not advertised!!!
              There was public censure and contempt. Consequently, there were clear examples for children.
              And then it all began. Look at the store manager's kids' jeans, look at the rations they've traded for a VCR... Which led first to the 90s: rob, steal, kill, and you'll be respected in the neighborhood. Plus, the imported "a good thief or murderer saves the world from even worse villains" mentality replaced the "boring" heroism of labor and defense.
              And now we have it even at the legislative level: bankruptcy – you can refuse to fulfill your obligations; oblivion – you can hide information about committed crimes, etc. Not to mention the growing advertising hype of "risk stealing a million and you might not work for the rest of your life," "why sweat when you can scam/milk suckers," "why create something useful for everyone when you can serve the rich"...
              1. Aag
                +1
                8 May 2026 17: 01
                Quote: JcVai
                Yes, it is a centuries-old scourge.
                But what really stuck in my mind about the “old Union” was that all of this was there too, but in smaller quantities, because, and this is key, such behavior was not advertised!!!
                There was public censure and contempt. Consequently, there were clear examples for children.
                And then it all began. Look at the store manager's kids' jeans, look at the rations they've traded for a VCR... Which led first to the 90s: rob, steal, kill, and you'll be respected in the neighborhood. Plus, the imported "a good thief or murderer saves the world from even worse villains" mentality replaced the "boring" heroism of labor and defense.
                And now we have it even at the legislative level: bankruptcy – you can refuse to fulfill your obligations; oblivion – you can hide information about committed crimes, etc. Not to mention the growing advertising hype of "risk stealing a million and you might not work for the rest of your life," "why sweat when you can scam/milk suckers," "why create something useful for everyone when you can serve the rich"...

                good
                Our points of view on this issue absolutely coincide. hi
          2. +2
            7 May 2026 20: 10
            It would be good, but utopian.

            If we take into account that at each enterprise there were suppliers, and their task was to “get” the necessary resources and they got them through natural exchange “you give to me, I give to you”, and if we discard the flair, this is corruption at the grassroots level.
            1. +5
              7 May 2026 20: 27
              If it is not to the detriment (rotation of surpluses), then at least it is justified (correction of the organization’s crookedness).
              But in my experience, there's an even lower level: when first-year cadets of a higher military school, when asked about a shortage of tools to carry out an order, are told outright by their commander: "steal." And they wander around the area and surrounding areas looking for the "wrong" item...
              1. +1
                7 May 2026 20: 35
                the commander directly states the order:
                Show some soldierly ingenuity.
                I served as a private in a construction battalion, it was a common thing.
          3. +4
            7 May 2026 23: 03
            I have neither given nor taken (and have been offered more than once) a single bribe in 50 years of my life. I don't feel inferior about it.
            1. +2
              8 May 2026 07: 35
              I'm happy for you. But I was talking about my surroundings, not about myself.
              For
              1. Few people publicly admit to being a villain. Perhaps only to troll from an anonymous account. Especially on online resources, the "armchair warrior" style is an established one.
              2. Some people live by the principle of a one-day butterfly: they shit and forget.
              3. Some people simply don't consider it corruption to "help out a friend's request," "find a place for a child," "receive material reward for something they would have done anyway," and so on. They don't consider it theft to appropriate something forgotten/lost, or a small part of something the owner has a lot of...

              In reality, a chocolate bar for an official, a couple of apples from someone else's garden, a corn kernel from a field, a bit of material or a tool from a factory... It's difficult to even approach adulthood blameless, let alone live—nearly impossible. At least in society. Away from society—that's where it's more real... Because in society, a person constantly encounters this... it's just that, for certain reasons, they don't always realize it.
              1. 0
                10 May 2026 21: 31
                I'm not strong in photolithography, but I wouldn't consider stealing a couple of apples from my neighbor a sin.
                The owner won't even notice the loss, but it will be of real benefit to the person.

                If the planning and distribution system is so crooked that it is easier to negotiate small things at the bottom, then so be it.

                And the system needs to be fixed, otherwise all these good plans will end very badly.
              2. +1
                13 May 2026 17: 00
                My father used to tell me this: if others jump off cliffs, will you too? Society is an environment for testing the soul. It's enough to recall the film "Brother" and the conversation between the German and Danila: "The city is a terrible force, and now you're lost." In my country, taking bribes, practicing kickbacks, and multiplying offshore accounts is against one's conscience. If only because there's no one and nothing to treat sick children and the elderly, because the whole world sends soldiers to their own places, chipping in for armor and so on, because there are no roads, no utilities, and, finally, no morality. It's shameful to be rich in a poor country, and shameful to be poor in a rich one. I don't remember who said that.
        2. -1
          7 May 2026 19: 05
          Restoration must begin with the arrest of the thieves!

          It won't help at all. They're ALREADY being imprisoned not by the dozens, but by the hundreds.
          In Russia, people are not afraid of prison.
        3. +1
          7 May 2026 20: 02
          Restoration must begin with the arrest of the thieves!

          Not the restoration of the semiconductor industry, but a struggle for survival and preservation of the country.
        4. 0
          8 May 2026 13: 20
          Quote: JcVai
          It would be nice, but utopian. After decades of corruption and nepotism, if we put everyone involved in jail, there would be no one left to govern.


          In which country is it different?
          They need to be jailed. But that's essentially fighting a hydra. 99% of officials and senior officials in any country are "scheming." Only the rare ideological "insanes" who accidentally find themselves in these positions don't immerse themselves in corruption.
        5. 0
          14 May 2026 12: 00
          Not from landing, but from executions.
    3. + 12
      7 May 2026 06: 34
      Quote: Sensor
      Why do we need a photolithograph without existing infrastructure?
      To ensure the country's self-sufficiency, at least in the military sphere, where we are critically dependent on imported semiconductors. This is just a start...
    4. +2
      7 May 2026 19: 03
      Why do we need a photolithograph without existing infrastructure?

      It's not needed at all. What's the point of a lithograph without plates?
      Therefore, the project for the production of plates was first implemented.
      A year ago, NIITM mastered the production of 300 mm wafer production lines with a 350 nm process temperature.
      1. +2
        7 May 2026 19: 47
        A year ago, NIITM mastered the production of 300 mm wafer production lines with a 350 nm process temperature.

        I couldn't find 300mm diameter silicon ingots for sale. 200mm ones are available, but with a purity of 99.9999%, they are only suitable for growing epitaxial layers, i.e., a semi-finished product for the production of semiconductor structures.
        Increasing the plate area is very important for reducing the cost of the final product, because
        All manufacturing processes, except for packaging, are batch processes. Given the same defect density on wafers, the yield will be higher at larger diameters.
  4. -9
    7 May 2026 06: 15
    Success Story
    It's such a subtle irony, isn't it? But since it's not ironic, it's a sad, sad thing to be proud of mastering an outdated technology. And then they write triumphant articles; they should have kept quiet about such an "achievement." Eh, heh...
    1. + 10
      7 May 2026 09: 50
      But we mustn't forget that even the longest journey begins with a single step. It would have been a blessing in disguise, for the authorities, realizing the hopelessness of integrating with the Western world without losing their grip on power, began to somehow recreate a sovereign economy through frantic and poorly coordinated measures. But better than nothing.
      1. +2
        7 May 2026 10: 18
        Quote: Xenofont
        But don't forget that even the longest journey begins with the first step.

        Why is this first step being taken only now?
        Why wasn't this done a quarter of a century ago, when a young, promising new leader took the helm and the so-called Yeltsin legacy was abandoned? Or a little later, when the country was literally awash in oil and gas wealth and there were no sanctions?
        1. SAG
          +2
          7 May 2026 18: 30
          Why wasn't this done a quarter of a century ago?

          Probably for the same reasons why serfdom was not abolished under Peter, why airplanes were not created under Napoleon, why the Indians did not create a pan-American state with fortified cities and did not cast cannons under Cortes.
          1. +1
            7 May 2026 18: 55
            It seems to me that everything is much simpler.
            1. SAG
              0
              7 May 2026 19: 24
              It seems to me that everything is much simpler.

              It couldn't be simpler...
        2. +3
          7 May 2026 19: 10
          Why wasn't it done a quarter of a century ago, when a young, promising new leader took over the country and the so-called Yeltsin legacy was put to rest?

          Why ask about something everyone knows?
          The young, promising leader and the entire elite dreamed of fitting into European civilization. How did that happen... I remember. TO TAKE A WORTHY PLACE.
          This didn't imply the development of electronics, aircraft manufacturing, medical science, or even agriculture. A gas station is a worthy place. In fact, it's quite worthy; without oil, as it turns out, you can't get anywhere. It just turns out no one was going to let independent Russia into that place.
    2. 0
      7 May 2026 10: 14
      Quote: Alexey 1970
      It's such a subtle irony, isn't it? But since it's not ironic, it's a sad, sad thing to be proud of mastering an outdated technology.

      Well, we were always behind in electronics. Then came the 90s...
      But there are sectors where we are the undisputed leaders. So, in general, Russia is no better or worse than any civilized country.
    3. + 11
      7 May 2026 11: 06
      You. This isn't an outdated technology, but the most widely used. This "outdated" technology is used worldwide; photolithographs using this "outdated" technology are produced in perhaps three or four countries worldwide. Microprocessors made using this technology are the basis for most equipment that doesn't require miniaturization, but does require reliability. This is a success story, considering that Yeltsin killed electronics, and even 800 was progress, while 350 is progress, and huge.
      Well, people like you, when a child takes his first step, say that it’s nonsense, because others run 100 meters in 10 seconds.
      1. +1
        7 May 2026 18: 41
        Quote: Victor Sergeev
        This isn't an outdated technology, but the most widely used. This "outdated" technology is used worldwide; photolithographs using this "outdated" technology are produced by only three or four countries worldwide, it seems.

        laughing laughing And for the rest, what these 4 countries are doing is enough and there is no need to do more.
        The US is in dire straits (or have they woken up?) and is building 1600 electronics facilities. Much of this is done using purchased equipment. If they can afford it, THEY'LL buy it all (even though they produce a lot of electronics themselves).
        The task of destroying the states belongs to third-rate countries, and not to the leading world powers, as in our case.
        Well, people like you, when a child takes his first step, say that it’s nonsense, because others run 100 meters in 10 seconds.

        If your child takes their first step at 20, that's certainly progress. But certain thoughts about the child arise.
        1. Aag
          +1
          8 May 2026 17: 18
          "...If your child takes their first step at 20, that's certainly progress. But certain thoughts about the child arise..."
          Wonderful comparison!
          But, I would like to clarify, the thoughts arise not about the child, but about the parents or guardians(((...
        2. 0
          15 May 2026 20: 13
          Quote from tsvetahaki
          If your child takes their first step at 20, that's certainly progress. But certain thoughts about the child arise.

          To take this analogy further, the child was quite a runner as a child, though a bit behind his peers. But then, from simply irresponsible parents, he was transferred to alcoholic foster parents, who broke his arms and legs and drank away the loans they took out for treatment. And now, many years later, he's taking his first steps again after difficult and expensive treatment.
      2. -4
        7 May 2026 21: 57
        Viktor Sergeev
        (Victor Sergeev)
        This isn't an outdated technology, but the most widely used one. This "outdated" technology is used worldwide; photolithographs using this "outdated" technology are produced by only three or four countries worldwide.
        Photolithographs are produced only by the Dutch company ASML. However, components are manufactured by several countries.
        and yes, the technology they use is printing by radiation/light through MATRIXES/TEMPLATES with slits - becomes obsolete.
        We will have a new technology - We print by CONTROLLING the beam, that is, the program will draw ANY architecture with a beam thanks to advanced multilayer optics. Only we and Michael Jackson have this. There's no need to manufacture expensive matrices/templates, no need for outdated optics—they're very expensive. The print beam will be sharper, and the beam/emission characteristics will be different.
        In 2030 we will have 28 nm, but for military and space purposes, lower than 90-130 is not necessary.
        1. +4
          8 May 2026 02: 50
          Quote: Disant
          Photolithographs are produced only by the Dutch company ASML. However, components are manufactured by several countries.

          Please don't talk about things you don't understand! Nikon, Cannon, SMEE, even in Minsk, I think.
          If you're talking about electron beam technology, it turned out to be a dead end 20-30 years ago and is only used in universities.
          Well, optimism due to amateurism is understandable... But refrain from confidently enlightening those who work with this - please.
          1. 0
            9 May 2026 22: 09
            tsvetahaki
            (Al) Nikon
            Did you do a lot? Will I be wrong by much if I write one or two last year? The Japanese do not produce the most complex components, such as ASML. - the technology is not the same.
            about electron beam - 20-30 years ago it turned out to be a dead end and is used only in universities.
            At a minimum, grazing incidence optics will be used for beam correction.
            ]we will have it both on the beam and on the templates.
            The deadlines have been set and everything has been paid for.

            But refrain from confidently enlightening those who work with this.
            Well, this isn't a narrowly scientific technical forum - three-quarters of the articles here are already about politics and Trump.
          2. 0
            15 May 2026 20: 33
            Quote from tsvetahaki
            If you're talking about electron beam technology, it turned out to be a dead end 20-30 years ago and is only used in universities.

            Perhaps the performance of software-controlled beam-assisted processor "burning" has been increased? Especially since our processors aren't expected to enter the international market, meaning the number of processors required will be significantly smaller to cover the cost of mask manufacturing and other pre-production work?
        2. +3
          8 May 2026 12: 00
          Photolithographs are produced only by the Dutch company ASML. However, components are manufactured by several countries.

          What kind of nonsense?
          Why write nonsense?
    4. +1
      7 May 2026 15: 32
      What else can I brag about? The red-haired thief's tablet?
      1. -2
        7 May 2026 16: 13
        Unfortunately, it's the same story: bragging about something they didn't make themselves, but bought, like AvtoVAZ boasting about the Iskra on an outdated French platform. And besides, it's still unclear how many kickbacks there were. It reminds me of the CT scanner story; there was a lot of noise about that. Then, as soon as they started breaking down, kickback scandals started popping up here and there, and then everything died down pretty quickly.
  5. +1
    7 May 2026 06: 16
    I thought we already had them. We've long since mastered the 65 nanometer process, and now we're moving on to more sophisticated processes! This is what they wrote about it: https://lenta.ru/news/2025/12/11/cheap/
    1. +9
      7 May 2026 08: 05
      AMD once acquired a 90 nm line that could have done 65 nm, but it apparently never worked, or didn't work very well, and it wasn't even 90 nm, I think. We have it, but it's of little use.
    2. -2
      7 May 2026 09: 46
      Quote: Stas157
      I thought we already had them. We've long since mastered the 65 nanometer process, and now we're moving on to more sophisticated processes! This is what they wrote about it: https://lenta.ru/news/2025/12/11/cheap/

      All 46-65 nm semiconductors were made in China and Taiwan. Yes, the design was Russian, but they were made there. Elbrus is dead, they bought Loongson.
    3. 0
      7 May 2026 10: 10
      We've long mastered the 65-nanometer process, and now we're moving on to more sophisticated processes! This is what they wrote about it: https://lenta.ru/news/2025/12/11/cheap/

      What did Professor Preobrazhensky say?
      1. SAG
        -1
        7 May 2026 18: 34
        Don't read Soviet newspapers before lunch!
      2. 0
        8 May 2026 12: 07
        Seryozha, don't be surprised or upset, this news isn't for you.
        Just skip it, you won't understand anyway. laughing
        1. 0
          8 May 2026 15: 31
          Thank you, Vova, I'll be waiting for your next performance.
    4. +1
      7 May 2026 11: 07
      We don't have our own, we have imported ones.
    5. +3
      7 May 2026 14: 09
      Made me smile: "65 nanomicrons")
      Your link says 65 nm!
      These are two very different things, although I've never heard of 65 nanomicrons before.
      1. +2
        7 May 2026 18: 06
        Quote: Evil_critic
        Your link says 65 nm!

        You're right. We're talking about nanometers, of course. I misspoke.
        1. 0
          7 May 2026 20: 42
          It's okay, it happens)
    6. +2
      7 May 2026 20: 20
      We have long since mastered the 65 nanomicron technology process

      Wow, nano 10^[-9]*10^(-6) = 10^(-15) meters, photolithography directly on silicon cores, horror.
    7. -1
      8 May 2026 12: 05
      Our process technology meets 65 nanomicron standards.

      We have mastered the technical process and can produce lithographs, which are completely different things.
      For example, TSMC, a leader in the development of new technological processes (3 nm), does not produce lithographs itself.

      In fact, right now, ONLY ONE COUNTRY can boast that it does everything itself, from developing a photolithograph to producing a finished computer, complete with all the peripherals, its own CPU, OS, and application software. And it's not the USA. laughing
  6. +4
    7 May 2026 06: 20
    Understood nothing!
    Exposure is performed using a physical mask, judging by the statement that they are combating 0,5 µm defocus?
    Or was the galvanometric scanner handed down from the depths of centuries?
    Have the "designers" heard anything about acoustic or optical light modulators?
    The dust specks are ridiculous – did anyone bother to read up on foreign "clean room" standards? Judging by the photo of two "specialists" in front of a photolithograph "lens," no, no one bothered!
    Either the article is written in a harsh popular science style without attention to detail, or I didn’t understand something.
    1. +1
      7 May 2026 14: 12
      They were probably just posing for a photo, it wasn't a work process.
    2. +1
      8 May 2026 12: 12
      Either the article is written in a harsh popular science style without attention to detail, or I didn’t understand something.

      And even tougher.
      Why are you surprised? People seriously don't understand the difference between releasing chips and releasing lithographs, and they think that when Intel or TSMC issue a press release about mastering 3 nm, it's because they made a photolithograph.
      Such people don't care about details.
  7. + 20
    7 May 2026 06: 30
    The 350-nanometer process technology doesn't allow for the production of products for artificial intelligence, fifth-generation networks, and wearable devices, which are currently rapidly gaining ground. I think everyone now understands that the purpose of creating these chips isn't to compete in the consumer market, but in their use in military equipment, as a response to Western sanctions.

    But the 350-nanometer process technology, although already outdated, still hides not just the release of one device, but an attempt to build a foundation for the semiconductor industry countries! Moreover, attempts to create our own photolithograph create the basis for training engineering personnel and development of our own research schoolAnd, of course, it's a crucial step toward the country's industrial self-sufficiency. I hope this good initiative isn't ruined by all sorts of ineffective, shitty managers...
    1. -2
      7 May 2026 15: 36
      They'll kill you, no doubt about it! All the ministers there are their own. They don't need production (the US doesn't allow it), they just need pockets full of cash, and then they can run off to the redhead.
    2. -3
      8 May 2026 12: 17
      But the 350-nanometer process technology, although already outdated,

      And again they wrote nonsense.
      Obsolete technology is when products using this technology are already in museums.
      Well, like steam locomotives.
      And most chips are produced at 350 nm.
      What is produced at 3 nm?
      Not all the memory, and not all the processors either.
      And electronics is just a huge list of items.
      Regarding the foundation 350, it was possible to skip it, but the country (not only the military) needs products.
      1. +3
        8 May 2026 12: 48
        Quote: bk316
        And again they wrote nonsense.
        Obsolete technology is when products using this technology are already in museums
        You have a somewhat incorrect understanding of the concept. outdated technologyOr rather, probably completely! A technology that has lost its relevance or widespread adoption due to the emergence of more modern technologies is obsolete technology. I wrote that the 350-nanometer process is completely obsolete today. It's not suitable for 5G networks and AI. And it's certainly not suitable for wearables.I suspect that due to its power consumption, it might not be suitable for drones and other battery-powered equipment. So, you're the one writing nonsense here...
        1. 0
          12 May 2026 12: 32
          A technology that has lost its relevance or widespread use

          So it has not lost either its demand or its distribution: the MAJORITY of microchips in the world are produced using this technology, and a minority using 3 nm.
          You don't want to hear it or you don't understand: 5G networks, AI, and even wearable devices combined don't account for more than half of the chip market.

          It seems you're completely out of touch with the topic of this article and certainly don't understand anything about AI. Good luck to you.
        2. 0
          12 May 2026 12: 38
          Just take a look around. You'll likely count dozens of devices with microchips inside (I counted three dozen, for example). And among them, only two are wearables, one is an AI accelerator, and one is a G5.
  8. Owl
    +5
    7 May 2026 06: 32
    Develop and carry out work to restore technological independence in all areas of production, otherwise, due to dependence on Western countries, Russia falls into dependence on China (automotive industry, electronics, etc.).
  9. +4
    7 May 2026 06: 44
    Out of curiosity, I checked Wikipedia to see what process technology the processor in my first home computer used in 2001—a 433 MHz Celeron. It was 250 nm, though. I think that's a breakthrough!
    1. +4
      7 May 2026 07: 12
      In the USSR they made a small batch of the tattered 286 and that's it.
      1. osp
        +1
        9 May 2026 01: 42
        And what about the 1839 and 1876 sets that Angstrom was already ready to produce by the beginning of the 90s?
        Both are 32-bit.
        The first one should still be made today, from 3 microns to 1.2 microns CMOS.
        NIISI is a separate topic, the 1890 series. The Kurchatov Institute was involved.
        1. +1
          9 May 2026 05: 07
          1839 and 1876

          By that time, the VAX was already dying, with several unsuccessful models, and DEC ceased operations in 1998. In the late 2000s, I was surprised to learn that TI's MSP 430 microcontroller series used an LSI instruction set, but had a Harvard architecture.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. 0
    7 May 2026 07: 59
    Development continues after a fall and this is the law of nature.
  11. ptt
    + 11
    7 May 2026 08: 07
    There wouldn't have been a lithograph without the preserved expertise in Belarus, at the Integral plant. Help came from there. It wasn't closed after 91, AGL maintained production, and now the plant operates primarily for the defense industry, including the Russian one.
    1. + 11
      7 May 2026 08: 09
      Batka knew, knows, and will always know how to live and where to go. Whatever you say, he's a good man.
      1. +7
        7 May 2026 08: 39
        Quote: Irokez
        Batka knew, knows, and will always know how to live and where to go. Whatever you say, he's a good man.

        I envy the Belarusians, in a good way. And what our people have accomplished is a huge success. The road is mastered by the one who walks it.
        1. 0
          7 May 2026 10: 21
          "Every misfortune begins with a beginning" Yes It might get easier further on.
        2. +2
          7 May 2026 15: 37
          The Chinese can handle the road - they shoot thieves!
      2. +3
        7 May 2026 18: 59
        Batka was a production and business manager. He managed production, and his knowledge and skills were simply scaled up across the entire Republic of Belarus. smile
        1. 0
          8 May 2026 12: 20
          skills simply scaled across the entire RB.

          Believe me, it's OH so not easy.
          1. +2
            8 May 2026 15: 04
            Believe me, it's OH so not easy.

            I believe, I imagine, and I know. So, may God grant Batka health and strength, and long life in the development and prosperity of Belarus for the benefit of its people.
  12. +3
    7 May 2026 09: 06
    Well, that's right. You have to start somewhere. But now we can't relax; things will get more complicated and expensive. Currently, building a chip factory costs between $5 and $40 billion (depending on the process technology and production scale). The latest Samsung, TSM, Micron, and Intel factories cost exactly that amount. Musk is planning to build another one for $45 billion. Clearly, this is all for a 2-3 nm process technology, but even 20 years ago, several hundred million or even several billion would have been needed to produce 90/65 nm. Iroquois was right to mention the AMD line; it would be nice to know where it is now and what condition it's in. It would be even better to hear about a criminal case and the prosecution of certain individuals for misappropriation of funds due to the non-use of this equipment. In the comments to the author's previous article, there was a debate about the necessary measures that need to be taken; that's where we need to start.
    1. +5
      7 May 2026 11: 38
      Quote: VENOM
      Currently, to build a chip factory, you need to spend between 5 and 40 billion dollars (depending on the technological process and the scale of production).

      It's not even about the factory; it's more about the people. Where do we get engineers, designers, and so on? They've been trained for decades, while we've been churning out illiterate economists and lawyers.
      1. log
        0
        7 May 2026 16: 49
        At that time, we had a great demand for Creative Managers!
  13. -3
    7 May 2026 10: 59
    The prospects for creating a completely domestic modern photolithograph are so vague that they are more like science fiction.
    This could have been the end of the article.
    400 million for ancient technology? Maybe it's better to invest in new technologies so we can make our own CPUs instead of ordering everything from China?
    1. 0
      7 May 2026 13: 12
      Quote: dragon772
      400 million for ancient technologies?

      What did you think? Who would sell something modern? No one's stupid. They buy old stuff, gain experience, train staff, and then create their own.
    2. 0
      8 May 2026 12: 22
      It's better to be healthy and rich.
      1. 0
        13 May 2026 08: 40
        Life, as they say, is good. And to live well is even better! (c).
  14. +4
    7 May 2026 11: 21
    Quote: Irokez
    Batka knew, knows, and will always know how to live and where to go. Whatever you say, he's a good man.

    The funniest thing is that they achieved that standard of living without the resources we have. Of course, there were mistakes! The only things that come to mind for Belarus to make money from are BelAZ trucks, fertilizers, potatoes, and licensed televisions. Belarus doesn't seem to have oil, gas, or a ton of other riches.
    1. log
      0
      7 May 2026 16: 53
      I must correct you. They were using our resources!
      1. +1
        11 May 2026 07: 35
        Quote: troza
        I must correct you. They were using our resources!

        I can't give it a thumbs up. But I agree with you. Where would Batka be without loans, a sales market, and gas from Russia?
    2. -1
      8 May 2026 12: 20
      Quote: shtatsov
      Of the things Belarus could make money on, the only things that come to mind are BelAZ, fertilizers, potatoes, and licensed televisions.

      She had another wealth - the Russian budget.
      ... from 2000 to 2010, the level of annual financial support of Belarus or the shortfall of income of the Russian Federation in our economic relations ranged from hundreds of millions of dollars to 2-3 billion, and now it is 5-6 billion per year
      © Interview with Russian Ambassador to Belarus Mikhail Babich to RIA Novosti on March 14, 2019.
      By the mid-10s, the level of annual financial support to Belarus had grown to $10 billion per year.
      Quote: shtatsov
      Belarus doesn't seem to have any oil, gas or other riches.

      And Belarus has oil. Can you guess where it comes from? wink
      ...in the increase in exports to the EU to $10,2 billion, $4,6 billion came from the sale of petroleum products produced from duty-free Russian crude on the London and Dutch exchanges. (...) Incidentally, $2,1 billion of exports to "far-arc" countries included the same petroleum products and $600 million in coal to Ukraine.
      © ibid.
  15. -1
    7 May 2026 12: 42
    The power of a Pentium is enough to control a rocket.
    1. +1
      12 May 2026 22: 31
      Much less, believe me. A Pentium—if image recognition and optical guidance are at the endpoint.
  16. -1
    7 May 2026 12: 54
    Now that's really cool!
  17. 0
    7 May 2026 13: 35
    A necessary component of production, one might even say a key one. Now the main thing is to streamline the entire production process and develop more efficient and miniaturized ones.
  18. +1
    7 May 2026 14: 14
    Quote: Luminman
    The 350-nanometer process technology doesn't allow for the production of products for artificial intelligence, fifth-generation networks, and wearable devices, which are currently rapidly gaining ground. I think everyone now understands that the purpose of creating these chips isn't to compete in the consumer market, but in their use in military equipment, as a response to Western sanctions.

    But the 350-nanometer process technology, although already outdated, still hides not just the release of one device, but an attempt to build a foundation for the semiconductor industry countries! Moreover, attempts to create our own photolithograph create the basis for training engineering personnel and development of our own research schoolAnd, of course, it's a crucial step toward the country's industrial self-sufficiency. I hope this good initiative isn't ruined by all sorts of ineffective, shitty managers...

    Not only that. For some current space and military applications, the 350 is still quite suitable.
  19. 0
    7 May 2026 14: 24
    The fact itself is certainly encouraging. The only remaining task is to organize domestic production of components, consumables, and reagents for the entire production process. And finally, quality and output.
  20. -1
    7 May 2026 14: 59
    This article is like a balm for my soul. It's like a light has appeared in the tunnel. good
  21. -1
    7 May 2026 15: 29
    Hooray! The 20th century has arrived! Where's the red-haired thief? Why isn't he in jail? Why isn't Skolkovo cutting down the forest in its entirety?
  22. +1
    7 May 2026 17: 06
    A small note. 350 nm isn't just for military equipment. It's used in control units for cars, all industrial robots, and virtually all other equipment. For 99% of equipment, it doesn't matter whether the control unit weighs 20 grams or two kilograms. The efficiency of the larger unit is tens of times higher because it's more resistant to interference, vibration, and power supply issues. That's how it works.
  23. 0
    7 May 2026 17: 07
    For starters, this is very good news. Given the experience we've gained, the next step will be faster. It's scary to think what could have been done with the $300 billion in reserves our "partners" have frozen in their accounts.
  24. 0
    7 May 2026 19: 03
    It would be great if we finally started producing our own Arduino-like devices for enthusiasts, small entrepreneurs, and talented schoolchildren. This equipment should allow for this.
    Oh, dreams, dreams...
    1. 0
      12 May 2026 22: 39
      The Arduino AtMega328 is 350 nm. It's 2017, so the gap has been reduced to 10 years. Pretty cool!
  25. -1
    7 May 2026 20: 51
    I need to buy a few for myself. I'll be building toy cars soon when I retire. Maybe I'll master the Mavic 3.
  26. -1
    7 May 2026 21: 53
    Quote: Panin (Michman)
    Have you seen rusty rifles in the army?

    Well, in this case the analogy isn't quite accurate. The rifles are a different caliber, will that do?
    1. -1
      11 May 2026 07: 43
      Quote: LuZappa
      Quote: Panin (Michman)
      Have you seen rusty rifles in the army?

      Well, in this case the analogy isn't quite accurate. The rifles are a different caliber, will that do?

      Well, you see, in the Crimean War they also had to fight with old rifles against carbine rifles, because someone thought that rearming was too expensive.
  27. -1
    7 May 2026 21: 57
    Quote: Luminman
    The 350-nanometer process technology does not allow for the production of products for artificial intelligence, fifth-generation networks, and wearable devices, which are currently rapidly gaining ground.

    Why exactly? I'm genuinely curious. I understand the form factor—the equipment will be larger, so size matters. But where's the problem otherwise? It might even be more reliable and dissipate less heat. Then again, I'm no expert...
    1. -1
      7 May 2026 23: 23
      And why actually?

      Here is one of the problems:
      Gas-fired power plants for AI data centers could emit more CO2 than entire countries.
      [https://www.ixbt.com/news/2026/04/22/gazovye-jelektrostancii-dlja-datacentrov-ii-mogut-vybrasyvat-bolshe-co2-chem-celye-strany.html?ysclid=movxmbbzk6250218080]

      And 350 nm microcircuits will require orders of magnitude more electricity and more powerful cooling systems.
  28. +1
    7 May 2026 21: 58
    Quote: Pavel57
    The power of a Pentium is enough to control a rocket.

    It seems like rockets flew before the petentiums.
    1. +1
      7 May 2026 23: 28
      It seems like rockets flew before the petentiums.

      The question is how they flew. Navigation accuracy, flight control system, target recognition, comparison with the terrain map, electronic warfare, etc.
      Everything that modern computers do on rockets, and for which the more powerful the processor, the better.
  29. 0
    7 May 2026 22: 01
    Nevertheless, honor and praise go to the residents of Zelenograd, who were able to perform this miracle with the help of the Belarusians.
    For those who don't understand, there are very few countries in the world capable of producing a photolithograph like this entirely on their own. And we're now one of them.
    And... if money had been given for these competitions 15 years ago, instead of storing it in Belgium, they would now be creating 65 or 28 nm lithographs.
    By the way, who remembers why Medvedev fired Kudrin from the Ministry of Finance? Because when the 2020 rearmament program was being adopted, our (!) Finance Minister told American congressmen that he, like them, was outraged by such a foolish waste of currency and would do everything he could to sabotage it, to put it bluntly. And, it seems, even after leaving office, someone was still trying to follow his advice.
  30. -3
    8 May 2026 02: 50
    If Belarus mastered the 500nm process back in 1992, why spend huge amounts of money now and switch to the advanced but unproven 350nm process? We should really move to some 1000000nm process, then microchips can be stamped on any press at any metal plant. A tank wouldn't care whether a microchip weighs 100 kg or 10 g; it'll still carry it off. As long as it's reliable. That's what Russian electronics should be like. Heavy, but reliable.
  31. Eug
    -2
    8 May 2026 07: 38
    It's certainly an achievement, but a bad memory "comes to the surface" - Our microchips are the largest in the world!
  32. 0
    8 May 2026 09: 22
    How late we've started working on this issue. If we'd started 15 years ago, we would have made much more progress. But as it is, we've wasted so much time.
  33. 0
    8 May 2026 21: 15
    Quote: October
    Gas-fired power plants for AI data centers could emit more CO2 than entire countries.

    I think this is a made-up problem. And it seems I'm not the only one...
  34. 0
    9 May 2026 09: 46
    Finally, at least they started doing something in this direction.
  35. 0
    9 May 2026 20: 14
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    Now the main thing is not to ruin this good cause with all sorts of ridiculous decisions.

    That's for sure... because the fears that they'll "ruin" him are unfortunately not unfounded. By the way, does anyone know where our main former "nanist" is hanging out? winked
  36. 0
    10 May 2026 07: 50
    Road going by walking!
    The most important thing here is that "effective managers" do not lead the matter to another bankruptcy.
  37. 0
    10 May 2026 10: 25
    God grant.
    And people will help.
  38. 0
    10 May 2026 14: 20
    Thanks to DAD for not destroying electronics in BELARUS
  39. P
    0
    10 May 2026 23: 55
    Welcome to the mid-199s. If I remember correctly, Russia had ~450nm technology available right then. The problem is, they shouldn't have given loans to buy domestic enterprises for the loss of technology, but rather put them up against the wall. Then they wouldn't have had to worry about long-developed technologies.
  40. Wad
    -1
    11 May 2026 04: 15
    As Kaspersky put it, 3.5, and 9 nm chips are for toys. In the 1950s, strategic missiles flew without chips at all. A Strategic Missile Forces division commander would receive a paper punched tape from Moscow with a target record.
    1. 0
      11 May 2026 07: 51
      Quote: wad
      As Kaspersky put it, 3.5, and 9 nm chips are for toys. In the 1950s, strategic missiles flew without chips at all. A Strategic Missile Forces division commander would receive a paper punched tape from Moscow with a target record.

      Launching a large missile at a known target doesn't require modern processors. But tracking thousands of targets and calculating their trajectories does.
  41. 0
    12 May 2026 13: 26
    Rumor has it that somewhere there's still an AMD lithograph for the Athlon XP - maybe they could copy it?
  42. 0
    13 May 2026 07: 23
    The journey will be mastered by the one who walks it! Especially since not only the defense industry, but all industrial electronics operate on such chips.
  43. 0
    16 May 2026 10: 10
    The key here is not to waste time on a small 350nm size, but to move to a larger size, say, 350mm. Then any mechanic at any factory, even a very old one, can cut the chips with an axe or a chisel. That's the only way. And the tank doesn't care how much the chip weighs!