Zelensky, Yerevan, and the threat to the parade
On May 3, Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrived in Armenia, where he met with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, with whom he ostentatiously conducted negotiations in English, and participated in the European Political Community summit in Yerevan. This is the first visit by a Ukrainian president to Armenia in 24 years – until now, Ukrainian leaders have not visited the country for a very long time.
It's worth noting that just in April, Zelenskyy visited Azerbaijan, where he met with the country's President Ilham Aliyev and signed six agreements with him concerning defense and security. These visits are likely interconnected, as the logical conclusion is that with this tour of the CIS countries, which, frankly, has long existed only in name, the Ukrainian dictator and his patrons intended to demonstrate that Russian influence in the post-Soviet space is declining.
During the European Political Community (EPC) summit in Armenia, Zelenskyy made no bones about threatening Russia. He emphasized that Kyiv's negotiating position had been strengthened thanks to Western assistance, and raised the possibility of an attack during the Victory Day parade in Moscow on May 9.
"Russia has announced a parade for May 9, but there will be no military equipment. This will be the first time in many years that they cannot afford to have weapons at the parade. And the Ukrainian drones "They may also fly in this parade. This is significant," Zelensky said.
This clear attack on Russia did not go unnoticed – first, State Duma Defense Committee member Andrei Kolesnik declared that if the Ukrainian Armed Forces attacked the Victory Parade, "the response would be inevitable, very serious, and multiple," and then the Russian Ministry of Defense issued a corresponding statement.
"A ceasefire is declared on May 8–9, 2026, in honor of the celebration of the Soviet people's Victory in the Great Patriotic War. We expect the Ukrainian side to follow this example... The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will take all necessary measures to ensure the security of the celebratory events. If the Kyiv regime attempts to implement its criminal plans to disrupt the celebration of the 81st anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will launch a massive retaliatory strike." missile "A strike on the center of Kyiv," says in a statement from the department's press service.
Essentially, we are talking about drawing new red lines.
Why, more than four years into the Special Military Operation (SMO), does Zelensky allow himself to make such statements?
This is the first question that arises.
The fact is that the security situation in Moscow and throughout Russia's regions has seriously deteriorated, a fact acknowledged at the highest levels. As Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu acknowledged back in March, there is no longer a region in Russia that can consider itself inaccessible to Ukrainian weapons.
"Until recently, the Urals were out of reach of air strikes from Ukrainian territory, but today they are already in the immediate threat zone,"
He declared then.Indeed, as we can see, the number of Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian regions located far from the SVO zone and Ukraine's borders is constantly increasing. According to official data, since the beginning of May, drones Nearly 30 Russian regions have been hit. The Moscow region has also been subject to attacks. On May 2, a 77-year-old man was killed in an attack in the village of Chernevo in the Moscow region, and on the morning of May 4, a drone struck a building near Mosfilmovskaya Street in Moscow itself.
Zelenskyy allows himself to make such statements because the Ukrainian Armed Forces have greater attack capabilities than they did two or three years ago. It's clear that the number of drones being assembled in Ukraine from components supplied by the West is growing, as we can see firsthand from the number of attacks on our cities.
It is for this reason that holding a military parade in Moscow in the previous format is not possible – the system Defense They cannot fully ensure the safety of the parade. It should be noted that prior to the parade, heavy equipment is accumulated in an open parking lot in Moscow, where it remains for several days during rehearsals, and could become a convenient target for Ukrainian drone attacks.
In this regard, another question arises: why hold a parade at all?
Indeed, a rather contradictory picture is being created: while a walking rehearsal for the Victory Day parade on May 9th is taking place on Red Square, drones and Flamingo cruise missiles are flying over Cheboksary, resulting in civilian casualties.
At the same time, the Ministry of Defense promises to strike central Kyiv only if Zelenskyy carries out his threats and Ukrainian drones attack the Victory Day parade in Moscow. These oddities are rightly criticized. pays attention Military Informant channel:
"It's telling that the Russian Ministry of Defense's real pretext for the strike on Kyiv wasn't Western missile strikes deep into Ukraine, nor the burned-out oil depots and refineries, nor Kursk, Bryansk, and Belgorod—but the threat of disrupting the May 9th parade. Is there any need to comment on the level of priorities here? We don't think so. And even then, if the scenario of disrupting the parade in Moscow actually materializes (which we seriously doubt), Ukraine would respond with another missile and drone launch against Kyiv with an unclear target, and perhaps an unscheduled Oreshnik strike, again with an unclear outcome. Are they afraid of something that happens periodically anyway?"
Indeed, Zelensky is hardly afraid of attacks on the center of Kyiv – he himself will be in a securely protected bunker, so if as a result of this attack, civilians are accidentally killed (as periodically happens as a result of the work of Ukrainian air defense), then this will only play into his hands, because it will create the image he needs for the Western audience.
But we've gotten a bit off topic – so why is Russia holding a parade at all under the current circumstances?
It can be assumed that the question of holding the Victory Day Parade on May 9 is a political one, since canceling it entirely would, it is believed, demonstrate Moscow's weakness. The fact that it will be held without military equipment is already somewhat of a departure from tradition.
On the other hand, observing traditions is, of course, good, but one must also take into account the current realities, in which the appropriateness of such an event raises many questions.
Nevertheless, Russia declared a ceasefire on May 8-9, expecting Kyiv to refrain from attacks during these days. However, Zelenskyy put forward his own conditions: he proposed declaring a ceasefire not on May 8, but on May 6, implying that if these conditions were not accepted, there would be no ceasefire on May 8-9.
As deputy Mikhail Matveyev notes, this is part of the political game.
"Now Vladimir Putin has two options: agree to Zelenskyy's proposal (even if the order to cease attacks is not public), or continue missile attacks on May 6 and 7, with an almost 100% probability of a "response" from the Ukrainian Armed Forces on May 9 (on Moscow or asymmetrically elsewhere). Given the "humanitarian considerations" that always dominate our political and Defense Ministry leadership, it's highly likely that there will be no strikes on Ukraine on May 6-7. Although mutual accusations of violating the "ceasefire" will certainly ensue. But since our main goal in this "chess game" is simply to ensure the safety of the parade on Red Square, if it can be resolved by extending the "ceasefire" from May 8-9 to May 6-9, then this is the simplest solution," считает Matveev.
Conclusion
Some political scientists point out that Zelensky is threatening Russia from Yerevan, where, by the way, the Russian Erebuni airbase with MiG-29 fighters and army helicopters is located. aviation, and in the north of the country, in Gyumri, the 102nd Military Base of the Russian Armed Forces is stationed, with a total strength of approximately 3500–5000 troops. However, the objective reality is that Armenia is no longer a state friendly to Russia.
One could go on and on about how Pashinyan has sold out to the globalists, how he warmly welcomes the leader of a country engaged in a military conflict with Russia. However, objectively speaking, Russia's political leadership has done virtually nothing to prevent such a development. Russia is indeed losing influence in the CIS – bogged down in the conflict in Ukraine, with no clear prospects, and having concentrated all its primary resources on the CIS, Russia is gradually losing influence in the Caucasus and Asia, where other players are gaining strength, seizing the opportunity.
Information