I want a simple

48
I want a deputy or a senator to whom I can turn with questions and, if there are business questions, he will answer them himself, or attract competent specialists. Before the elections, all the parties promise me the soonest construction of anything in Russia, but after they forget to report back. And in general I will express a seditious thought that if you wake up every deputy and minister and ask if he knows that the people are his master, then 90% of those awakened will consider this an inappropriate joke. And my questions are simple and, probably, therefore indecent:

1. Why are my country's foreign exchange reserves working for the economies of unfriendly countries? Why does Kudrin and Ko expect foreign investments in my cold country with already far from selfless labor in the population? Do not need answers like: you do not understand; everyone does it; there will be hyperinflation. It is not necessary and incomprehensible complex mind-constructions, they always hide a lie.

2. Why the remuneration of state and municipal, non-private workers, workers (not officials) of culture, education, medicine is much lower than the average in any region (except Moscow). I am a production worker, but I believe that these areas of activity are even more important than agriculture and are basic. Pay at the expense of inefficient government and lower-ranking officials.

3. Why are there in high state posts those whom the people, to put it mildly, blame in many ways? If people make mistakes, announce a list of successes and achievements, for example, Chubais. And then we can say that the minister is not a ruble, in order to please everyone, and even state the State Duma. And the Duma was not indignant that they called her stupid, did not demand her resignation with the minister and the prime minister.

4. Why the immediate responsibility is not applied to the officials the more, the greater the damage done? The more responsibilities and rights, the more db. responsibility is the basics of management. And then in the country started the series "Serdyukov and girls", "Skrynnik and boys". The main characters are not even under house arrest. And by the end of the series may expire terms of attraction.

5. Why on TV is thriving "chernukha" and advertising a parasitic way of life? From TV, the impression is that there are four types of people in the country: criminals; advocates from criminals; officials (including businessmen); the artists. And material values ​​appear themselves. And a small sub-question, why the state-owned Gazprom through Gazprom-media with its TNT and Ekho Moskvy actively fights the country? With our media, it is surprising that there are people who are hurt for the state.

After the elections to the Duma, he tried to get something from the parliamentary parties, but even the oppositional Communist Party of the Russian Federation politely kept silent on the question of the contribution of the future premier of DAM to the development of the country. So I want a simple and good. Or a real democracy, enough for her to grow, it's time to be an adult. Or a good dictatorship, otherwise a long-developing democracy will bring the country to a hilt.

Patriots of Russia health, success, good luck, happiness.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    20 May 2013 06: 28
    They (the deputies) have no time to answer your questions, they need to think about Russia, worry, worry: - "how are the people there?", And you are with your questions. laughing
    1. +19
      20 May 2013 06: 42
      "Near the very gates, this, like his .. people" L. Filatov
    2. +9
      20 May 2013 06: 54
      Quote: Canep
      they need to think about Russia, worry, worry: - "how are the people there?"

      They think
      1. +7
        20 May 2013 06: 58
        So they think in a dream about the people, so the demotivator is not accepted laughing
    3. +5
      20 May 2013 07: 29
      Yes, these questions are long overdue.! And that's not all. It's time to give them a clear answer. It's time!
      1. +2
        20 May 2013 07: 34
        Quote: krasin
        ! And that’s not all. It's time to give them a clear answer.

        All that remains is for the one who will answer these questions. The case for small, and small, just not enough request
        1. patline
          +3
          20 May 2013 10: 07
          We do not need revolutions. Even patriotic. You know, after all, that revolutions are done alone - with pure thoughts, and others - more cunning, take advantage of its fruits.
          We need a clear gradual and progressive movement. And sharp zigzags, in the form of revolutions, benefit only our Western opponents.
          1. +4
            20 May 2013 19: 34
            And do not remind me - who took advantage of the fruits of the Great October Socialist Revolution? Stalin with Beria? Maybe we and our parents, who lived in the fairest, safest and most respected country in the world? Received the best free education in the world, medical care, social guarantees and clear life guidelines? I don’t know how anyone, but I would like my children to take advantage of THESE fruits. And not rotten dried fruits of bourgeois reality.
          2. +4
            20 May 2013 23: 19
            Quote: patline
            We do not need revolutions. Even patriotic.

            Someone from the great noted:
            Revolutions are conceived by geniuses
            exercise - fanatics,
            and the villains use its fruits!

            Stolypin said correctly: we do not need great upheavals, we need a great Russia. (speaking of revolutionaries: "They need great upheavals, but we need a great Russia"). This can be done only by putting folk remedies and the country's bowels at the service of the whole people! Then there will be enough for everything: for free education, medicine, defense, housing, social security for old age. It is necessary to convert green paper into gold, exclude settlements by sad raccoons, create a regional financial organization independent of the IMF. The only problem: Will world Jewry agree with this? It is very doubtful to me ... And will there be a national idea uniting all the healthy forces of the country to achieve this great goal?
  2. 0
    20 May 2013 06: 33
    Oooh. How few questions !!! And the questions themselves are not very sharp.
    1. folds
      +2
      22 May 2013 00: 03
      Even less is needed - just 2:
      "Aren't you crazy?"
      "Isn't it scary that the people will rise if you bring them to this?"
  3. +3
    20 May 2013 06: 40
    Good questions, but who will answer them. Probably we got a bit of answers after talking with the president (so streamlined). From them we learned that almost everything is fine with us.
  4. +4
    20 May 2013 06: 40
    All these "why?" like questions in court. Yes, I would like to present such a trial over all this and other bureaucratic outrage. The cry of the soul ..
    1. k220150
      +1
      20 May 2013 07: 57
      We have not 37, not 38, ... not the 53rd, they promised the end of the world, and it will be hard for everyone. And will be! Will be!
  5. Vanek
    +1
    20 May 2013 06: 41
    Why, why?

    BECAUSE!
    1. +1
      20 May 2013 10: 43
      Quote: Vanek
      BECAUSE!

      Power and politics in our country is a lot of money, and a lot of money alienates from the people and destroys the conscience of man!
  6. +3
    20 May 2013 06: 41
    Address the President on the following direct line !!!
    1. +3
      20 May 2013 06: 55
      Quote: treskoed
      Address the President on the following direct line !!!

      And what will the president answer?
      1. +1
        20 May 2013 10: 07
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And what will the president answer?

        I believe that he will give the correct answer. Both senators and deputies will confirm this.
    2. 0
      20 May 2013 10: 16
      And even wrote. Gaining in the past year.
      In response, I received a "thank you" and that's it.
      Though received thanks.
    3. bezumnyiPIT
      +2
      20 May 2013 12: 35
      Try calling first
  7. +3
    20 May 2013 06: 55
    Quote: Canep
    They (the deputies) have no time to answer your questions, they need to think about Russia, worry, worry: - "how are the people there?", And you are with your questions. laughing

    That's right.
    1. +2
      20 May 2013 07: 13
      Exactly, I took the phrase from here. good
  8. mogus
    +8
    20 May 2013 07: 17
    1996 year. The governor took office. The land had no debts.
    year 2013. The governor was replaced. They gave the order of the 4th degree for services to the Fatherland. The region owes 6 billion.
    1. +3
      20 May 2013 07: 35
      Quote: mogus
      year 2013. The governor was replaced. They gave the order of the 4th degree for services to the Fatherland. The region owes 6 billion.

      It means that they also got promoted in the position for "excellent" work.
      1. mogus
        +2
        20 May 2013 08: 27
        hi
        Probably...
        I sit and wonder ... 90% of the uranium in the country is from my edge, over the past few years the forest has been taken out by tueva hucha. But if we compare two towns at the crossing of the Zabaikalsk and Manchuria border checkpoint - the village and Las Vegas, although the money is collected equally here and there. Today, relatives have "made me happy", they have a salary in housing and communal services. now 3t.r. watchman and 5t.r. rest...
    2. +1
      20 May 2013 13: 25
      -mogus: The region owes 6 billion.
      To whom he owes, they gave the order.
      - My address: Though I received thanks.
      Still easy to get off.
      "Experts say that it has become better. But the people ... And the people are not an expert."
      We are a unique country where "servants of the people" live better than their masters.
      PS I repeat, but democracy is the power of the oligarchs over the people.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  9. +4
    20 May 2013 07: 32
    While we will sit in the kitchens and wait for someone else to decide for us. And while we think that nothing will change from our civic position, everything will continue to be so.
    Some grandmothers go to the polls.
    Young people are bombarded by Putinides.
    We do not need the Orangemen. I do not need chaos in the country.
    I want to see Russia great not because it has a lot of territory and everything in these territories is buried. I want to see Russia with strong, free, well-read citizens of my country.
    It seems like a utopia ...
  10. +8
    20 May 2013 07: 48
    Many questions have accumulated ... But no one will answer them, tk. "You need to answer for the market" fellow
  11. fenix57
    +2
    20 May 2013 07: 53
    Such simple questions and no one to answer them, because they "up there" think about the "global" and they do not have time to answer them ...
    What a pity, I just want to hear SIMPLE, UNDERSTANDING ANSWERS ....
  12. vladsolo56
    +8
    20 May 2013 08: 17
    What is the use of asking these questions, you can expand the list to infinity. The answer is all the same one. The authorities got what they wanted, capitalism, which means that everything that is done in the country is done only for the benefit of the capitalists and their officials. Under capitalism, the people are a primitive means of production. Production profits, and no more. Poor production in junk, even if it produces well but criticizes, also in junk. Even if it produces excellent, but overproduction, there too. Further on the proverb: The salvation of a drowning man, the work of the drowning man himself. You only need you until the pack is needed, a pun, but essentially the truth. the capitalist entrepreneur has gone bankrupt, you are on the street and there is nothing to pay for the mortgage on the street. Yes, we already repeat all this an infinite number of times. Only Socialism can ensure a just society. Of course with smart and competent leadership. If you declare socialism and leave all the same officials, there will be no sense.
  13. Dimkapvo
    +2
    20 May 2013 09: 11
    The prison cries for them, and for the majority, the highest measure of social protection. And the government, you are right, got what you wanted, not capitalism, but rabid feudalism in the highest degree of its abomination !!! Our sorcerers only have to legitimize the right of the first night and that’s all - the crown of dreams ...!
  14. dmb
    +1
    20 May 2013 10: 01
    It would be nice if at least Esaul would answer the questions posed in the cycle of articles promised on the next "branch". Naturally, we will not receive answers to them from the Guarantor of the Constitution, even if he communicates with the people not 4, but all 8 hours. However, there is little hope for "Esaul" either.
  15. +3
    20 May 2013 10: 10
    In America, by the way, the institution of power itself is the result of a social contract between different social (except slaves) groups of people who, after defeating the British in the War of Independence, decided to create a legal, well, at least by the standards of a state where everyone was responsible before the law regardless of their social status and position, there the senator would try to choose from one or another state not to respond to the civil request of his voters or a government official will fall for a bribe, and the next day he would be kicked out of government and in his homeland would become an outcast whom no one else would give a hand, in the United States the civil service is a very responsible but also an honorable kind of activity and a person who got there and not just like that, but having passed a serious competitive selection, will forgive the fifth point for the expression to tear, just not to lose your place, but to lose it there is very easy because public control there is not an empty phrase.
    What do we see in Russia? There was no social contract here, no, and no one is foreseen. Power in the country was the fruit of protests against the communists, they say everyone but the Communists. As a result, the public distanced themselves from making decisions, leaving them to a group of people with nothing and not so close to democracy apparatchiks and bandits who built the state for themselves beloved by exposing ordinary people (out of brackets). You do not need to look here for the machinations of the State Department or the CIA, it was ordinary people who did everything themselves with their indifference and indifference to eat their own destiny strany.I But when we put a saddle on his back and sat down on the people to realize that something is not here to see prices.
  16. +3
    20 May 2013 10: 32
    And I have a question. Why, looking at the citizen mentioned in paragraph 3, do you want to grab the pitchfork? Maybe I'm the only one and go to the hospital? But for some reason it seems to me that he already has a lot of such "fans".
  17. +6
    20 May 2013 11: 01
    Questions still car with a small truck.
    For example:
    Why is Belarus according to the human development index at the 50 place, and Russia only at the 55 place? This is despite the fact that the GDP per person in Russia is twice as high. It's simple. We have a wild income stratification of society. And a significant part of the domestic product goes not to the country and people, but to the enemies / enemies in the form of gold and foreign exchange reserves - thanks to the faithful Gaidar Kudrin and others.
    And questions appear as familiar with the open information. Thanks to Soviet education, in which many teachers taught not only to memorize, but also to think and analyze. Memory and knowledge is a necessary mininum, and in the ability to draw conclusions is from aerobatics. Now there is almost no learning, there’s no time, it’s necessary to cram.
    But to write everything at once is undesirable, the impression will be smeared
  18. +2
    20 May 2013 11: 31
    And more.
    Almost the topic.
    Think about it.
    Why does Alexander Romanov, the marshal and the moderator, have only one rating?
    Often criticizes the authorities? If so, then sad. Criticism is unpleasant, even fair, but without it, any education stops in development or goes into a dressing.
    I will constantly ply him.
    1. +1
      20 May 2013 11: 56
      I am already tired of plying it, it does not help. A rating of 1 means most likely that he is the first.
      1. +7
        20 May 2013 12: 35
        Moderators do not criticize the authorities.
        They have their own power.
        Therefore, such a rating. Where to jump even higher? The Generalissimo of the entire Galaxy on the forum is not and is not expected.
        ...
        Cheating and fraud - all this democracy.
        Voters choose a specific person. But they cannot recall him back.
        Parties - choose from their ranks. They can withdraw, they can remove. But no party will consider complaints from citizens against its members. Do you know about such complaints?
        ...
        Damn, every worker, student, etc. have your own personal SNILS, TIN.
        The number of computers (in the broad sense) is three to four times greater than the number of citizens with the right to vote.
        Instead of a show with webcams at polling stations, they would put scanners of SNILS and the voting result.
        We would put up a tracking system for the "approval-disapproval" of persons.
        Collected 100 thousand "black balls" - out of the power structures.
        This is skeletal so, basting. It seems that something is being done in this regard, or just going to?
        The point is, until we can recall the Officials ... then we can’t do anything.
        But there is no hope for our State Duma.
        As well as the guarantors. There were two. And one - so generally in two versions - before ... and after.
        Only now ".. and things are still there."
        1. YuDDP
          0
          21 May 2013 22: 15
          Quote: Igarr
          Instead of a show with webcams at polling stations, they would put scanners of SNILS and the voting result.

          Then Churov will remain without work. You can’t ...
    2. +1
      20 May 2013 14: 49
      Quote: My address
      Why does Alexander Romanov, the marshal and the moderator, have only one rating?

      Because it has exceeded one million. Where more?
  19. optimist
    +3
    20 May 2013 14: 02
    There is one simple and concrete answer to all these questions: the entire population of the USSR stupidly missed ... their future and the future of their children 25 years ago. As they say: having removed their head, they don’t cry through their hair.
  20. +2
    20 May 2013 14: 17
    Faced with legislation every day (not with criminal, but with economic law), I can confidently say: our deputies do not know what the LAW is and how the legislation affects the life of the country. In the 16-17 centuries, England and Spain were developmentally comparable states, but the countries went different ways, their legislation (especially tax) began to differ more and more. The result is obvious, but by historical standards, very little time has passed. Our deputies stamp thousands of documents and no one is studying how the situation in the country changes after the adoption of certain laws. The opinion of the expert community is completely ignored, not to mention the opinion of the people.
  21. +2
    20 May 2013 14: 38
    The essence of democracy and capitalism is that no one owes anything to anyone. Capitalism's motto is "whoever grabbed is right."
  22. Ruslan_F38
    +1
    20 May 2013 16: 17
    The article put a plus. Only these questions should be asked by investigators of the UK and the Prosecutor's Office.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. Best novel
    +2
    20 May 2013 16: 59
    Questions go nowhere. Or are these questions for the president? So he fulfilled the plan for answers for this year. And there is no point in asking him about anything now. And if (very unlikely, rather a utopia) every high-ranking official (governor, mayor, president at the end of the end) will ask his voters: “Do you trust me today?” and will give an opportunity to answer everyone who wants to, and moreover, he will listen and, with complete distrust, will resign - this will be democracy. A fairy tale you want to believe in.
  25. +1
    20 May 2013 17: 11
    Any democracy leads to the dictatorship of scum. Alfred Nobel
  26. luka095
    +1
    20 May 2013 19: 37
    Naturally, the president should answer these questions (as well as many others). If he is silent (otherwise he does not know about such issues), then he does not want to answer. And why does not want to - this is also a question.
  27. +1
    20 May 2013 22: 01
    In some fairy tale (or science fiction novel) it was said -: And then people will judge you. And then we'll talk ... "So he can try to organize an official, legally legitimate trial over all persons who have taken elective positions. Guilty - confiscation throughout the family and 10 years, no, benefits for life. It seems to me that everything is from the fact that there is no punishment for deceiving people (electorate). Promised - not fulfilled, to jail. Maybe someone will think?
  28. bilgesez
    +1
    20 May 2013 22: 37
    Give the Russian Revolution.
  29. NOBODY EXCEPT US
    +1
    20 May 2013 23: 27
    And you ask the president all these questions ... Just stock up with a fork, remove noodles from your ears, for example, on a straight line ....... well, do not forget the bucket .... for noodles ... then you will feed your family for a whole year ....
  30. +2
    21 May 2013 02: 58
    One YouTube blogger offered a rather interesting voting system (I can’t find the source, the link is lost forever)
    The bottom line is this: at the moment, officials say "choose me, I will do this and that",
    and this blogger offered this option: officials report on the work done "I did this, this and that, I will continue to do this, but I need your support" and only then they are elected.
    The essence is sketched very rudely, but as they say, as I understand it.
  31. gladiatorakz
    +1
    23 May 2013 11: 24
    Thanks to the author! In the top ten! These are sober people and must take power from the liquid patriots. Only without revolutions. And quiet. On the principle of the Cossack Circle or Mock law.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"