Military Review

I want a simple

I want a deputy or a senator to whom I can turn with questions and, if there are business questions, he will answer them himself, or attract competent specialists. Before the elections, all the parties promise me the soonest construction of anything in Russia, but after they forget to report back. And in general I will express a seditious thought that if you wake up every deputy and minister and ask if he knows that the people are his master, then 90% of those awakened will consider this an inappropriate joke. And my questions are simple and, probably, therefore indecent:

1. Why are my country's foreign exchange reserves working for the economies of unfriendly countries? Why does Kudrin and Ko expect foreign investments in my cold country with already far from selfless labor in the population? Do not need answers like: you do not understand; everyone does it; there will be hyperinflation. It is not necessary and incomprehensible complex mind-constructions, they always hide a lie.

2. Why the remuneration of state and municipal, non-private workers, workers (not officials) of culture, education, medicine is much lower than the average in any region (except Moscow). I am a production worker, but I believe that these areas of activity are even more important than agriculture and are basic. Pay at the expense of inefficient government and lower-ranking officials.

3. Why are there in high state posts those whom the people, to put it mildly, blame in many ways? If people make mistakes, announce a list of successes and achievements, for example, Chubais. And then we can say that the minister is not a ruble, in order to please everyone, and even state the State Duma. And the Duma was not indignant that they called her stupid, did not demand her resignation with the minister and the prime minister.

4. Why the immediate responsibility is not applied to the officials the more, the greater the damage done? The more responsibilities and rights, the more db. responsibility is the basics of management. And then in the country started the series "Serdyukov and girls", "Skrynnik and boys". The main characters are not even under house arrest. And by the end of the series may expire terms of attraction.

5. Why on TV is thriving "chernukha" and advertising a parasitic way of life? From TV, the impression is that there are four types of people in the country: criminals; advocates from criminals; officials (including businessmen); the artists. And material values ​​appear themselves. And a small sub-question, why the state-owned Gazprom through Gazprom-media with its TNT and Ekho Moskvy actively fights the country? With our media, it is surprising that there are people who are hurt for the state.

After the elections to the Duma, he tried to get something from the parliamentary parties, but even the oppositional Communist Party of the Russian Federation politely kept silent on the question of the contribution of the future premier of DAM to the development of the country. So I want a simple and good. Or a real democracy, enough for her to grow, it's time to be an adult. Or a good dictatorship, otherwise a long-developing democracy will bring the country to a hilt.

Patriots of Russia health, success, good luck, happiness.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Canep
    Canep 20 May 2013 06: 28 New
    Некогда им (депутатам) отвечать на ваши вопросы, им за Россию думать надо, переживать, волноваться: - "а как там народ?", а вы со своими вопросами. laughing
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 20 May 2013 06: 42 New
      "Возле самых у ворот, этот, как его.. народ" Л. Филатов
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 20 May 2013 06: 54 New
      Quote: Canep
      им за Россию думать надо, переживать, волноваться: - "а как там народ?",

      They think
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 20 May 2013 06: 58 New
        So they think in a dream about the people, so the demotivator is not accepted laughing
    3. krasin
      krasin 20 May 2013 07: 29 New
      Yes, these questions are long overdue.! And that's not all. It's time to give them a clear answer. It's time!
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 20 May 2013 07: 34 New
        Quote: krasin
        ! And that’s not all. It's time to give them a clear answer.

        All that remains is for the one who will answer these questions. The case for small, and small, just not enough request
        1. patline
          patline 20 May 2013 10: 07 New
          We do not need revolutions. Even patriotic. You know, after all, that revolutions are done alone - with pure thoughts, and others - more cunning, take advantage of its fruits.
          We need a clear gradual and progressive movement. And sharp zigzags, in the form of revolutions, benefit only our Western opponents.
          1. matross
            matross 20 May 2013 19: 34 New
            And do not remind me - who took advantage of the fruits of the Great October Socialist Revolution? Stalin with Beria? Maybe we and our parents, who lived in the fairest, safest and most respected country in the world? Received the best free education in the world, medical care, social guarantees and clear life guidelines? I don’t know how anyone, but I would like my children to take advantage of THESE fruits. And not rotten dried fruits of bourgeois reality.
          2. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 20 May 2013 23: 19 New
            Quote: patline
            We do not need revolutions. Even patriotic.

            Someone from the great noted:
            Revolutions are conceived by geniuses
            exercise - fanatics,
            and the villains use its fruits!

            Столыпин правильно сказал: нам не нужны великие потрясения, нам нужна великая Россия. (говоря о революционерах:"Им нужны великие потрясения, нам же нужна великая Россия"). Сделать это можно только поставив народные средства и недра страны на службу всему народу! Тогда на все хватит: на бесплатное образование,медицину, оборону, жилье, социальное обспечение старости. Нужно перевести зеленую бумагу в золото, исключить расчеты унылыми енотами, создать региональную финансовую организацию, независимую от МВФ. The only problem: Will world Jewry agree with this? It is very doubtful to me ... And will there be a national idea uniting all the healthy forces of the country to achieve this great goal?
  2. smel
    smel 20 May 2013 06: 33 New
    Oooh. How few questions !!! And the questions themselves are not very sharp.
    1. folds
      folds 22 May 2013 00: 03 New
      Even less is needed - just 2:
      "А не охренели ли вы?"
      "Не страшно, что народ поднимется, если вы его до этого доведёте?"
    DEDUCHKA 20 May 2013 06: 40 New
    Good questions, but who will answer them. Probably we got a bit of answers after talking with the president (so streamlined). From them we learned that almost everything is fine with us.
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 20 May 2013 06: 40 New
    Все эти "почему?" как вопросы на суде. Да, хотелось бы, представить такой суд над всем этим и другим чиновничьим безобразием. Вопль души..
    1. k220150
      k220150 20 May 2013 07: 57 New
      We have not 37, not 38, ... not the 53rd, they promised the end of the world, and it will be hard for everyone. And will be! Will be!
  5. Vanek
    Vanek 20 May 2013 06: 41 New
    Why, why?

    1. taseka
      taseka 20 May 2013 10: 43 New
      Quote: Vanek

      Power and politics in our country is a lot of money, and a lot of money alienates from the people and destroys the conscience of man!
  6. treskoed
    treskoed 20 May 2013 06: 41 New
    Address the President on the following direct line !!!
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 20 May 2013 06: 55 New
      Quote: treskoed
      Address the President on the following direct line !!!

      And what will the president answer?
      1. treskoed
        treskoed 20 May 2013 10: 07 New
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And what will the president answer?

        I believe that he will give the correct answer. Both senators and deputies will confirm this.
    2. My address
      20 May 2013 10: 16 New
      And even wrote. Gaining in the past year.
      В ответ получил "спасибо" и все.
      Though received thanks.
    3. bezumnyiPIT
      bezumnyiPIT 20 May 2013 12: 35 New
      Try calling first
  7. George
    George 20 May 2013 06: 55 New
    Quote: Canep
    Некогда им (депутатам) отвечать на ваши вопросы, им за Россию думать надо, переживать, волноваться: - "а как там народ?", а вы со своими вопросами. laughing

    That's right.
    1. Canep
      Canep 20 May 2013 07: 13 New
      Exactly, I took the phrase from here. good
  8. mogus
    mogus 20 May 2013 07: 17 New
    1996 year. The governor took office. The land had no debts.
    year 2013. The governor was replaced. They gave the order of the 4th degree for services to the Fatherland. The region owes 6 billion.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 20 May 2013 07: 35 New
      Quote: mogus
      year 2013. The governor was replaced. They gave the order of the 4th degree for services to the Fatherland. The region owes 6 billion.

      Значит еще и в должности повысили за "отличную" работу.
      1. mogus
        mogus 20 May 2013 08: 27 New
        Сижу и гадаю...90% урана в стране-с моего края,за последние несколько лет леса вывезено туева хуча. Но если сравнить два городка на переходе МАПП Забайкальск и Маньчжурию-деревня и лас-вегас,хотя деньги одинаково собирают тут и там. Вот сегодня ещё родственники "обрадовали",в ЖКХ у них з.п. теперь 3т.р. сторож и 5т.р. остальные...
    2. knn54
      knn54 20 May 2013 13: 25 New
      -mogus: The region owes 6 billion.
      To whom he owes, they gave the order.
      - My address: Though I received thanks.
      Still easy to get off.
      "Специалисты говорят,что стало лучше. Но народ... А народ-не специалист."
      Мы уникальная страна,где "слуги народные" лучше хозяев живут.
      PS I repeat, but democracy is the power of the oligarchs over the people.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  9. Consul-t
    Consul-t 20 May 2013 07: 32 New
    While we will sit in the kitchens and wait for someone else to decide for us. And while we think that nothing will change from our civic position, everything will continue to be so.
    Some grandmothers go to the polls.
    Young people are bombarded by Putinides.
    We do not need the Orangemen. I do not need chaos in the country.
    I want to see Russia great not because it has a lot of territory and everything in these territories is buried. I want to see Russia with strong, free, well-read citizens of my country.
    It seems like a utopia ...
  10. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 20 May 2013 07: 48 New
    Вопросов накопилось много...Но никто на них не ответит, т.к. "За базар нужно отвечать" fellow
  11. fenix57
    fenix57 20 May 2013 07: 53 New
    Такие простые вопросы и не кому на них ответить, ведь они "там наверху" думают о "глобальном" и нет у них времени отвечать на них...
    What a pity, I just want to hear SIMPLE, UNDERSTANDING ANSWERS ....
  12. vladsolo56
    vladsolo56 20 May 2013 08: 17 New
    What is the use of asking these questions, you can expand the list to infinity. The answer is all the same one. The authorities got what they wanted, capitalism, which means that everything that is done in the country is done only for the benefit of the capitalists and their officials. Under capitalism, the people are a primitive means of production. Production profits, and no more. Poor production in junk, even if it produces well but criticizes, also in junk. Even if it produces excellent, but overproduction, there too. Further on the proverb: The salvation of a drowning man, the work of the drowning man himself. You only need you until the pack is needed, a pun, but essentially the truth. the capitalist entrepreneur has gone bankrupt, you are on the street and there is nothing to pay for the mortgage on the street. Yes, we already repeat all this an infinite number of times. Only Socialism can ensure a just society. Of course with smart and competent leadership. If you declare socialism and leave all the same officials, there will be no sense.
  13. Dimkapvo
    Dimkapvo 20 May 2013 09: 11 New
    The prison cries for them, and for the majority, the highest measure of social protection. And the government, you are right, got what you wanted, not capitalism, but rabid feudalism in the highest degree of its abomination !!! Our sorcerers only have to legitimize the right of the first night and that’s all - the crown of dreams ...!
  14. dmb
    dmb 20 May 2013 10: 01 New
    Было бы неплохо, чтобы на поставленные вопросы ответил в цикле обещанных на соседней "ветке" статей хотя бы "Есаул". От Гаранта Конституции ответов на них мы естественно не получим, даже если он будет общаться с народом не 4, а все 8 часов. Впрочем и на "Есаула" надежда слабая.
  15. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 20 May 2013 10: 10 New
    In America, by the way, the institution of power itself is the result of a social contract between different social (except slaves) groups of people who, after defeating the British in the War of Independence, decided to create a legal, well, at least by the standards of a state where everyone was responsible before the law regardless of their social status and position, there the senator would try to choose from one or another state not to respond to the civil request of his voters or a government official will fall for a bribe, and the next day he would be kicked out of government and in his homeland would become an outcast whom no one else would give a hand, in the United States the civil service is a very responsible but also an honorable kind of activity and a person who got there and not just like that, but having passed a serious competitive selection, will forgive the fifth point for the expression to tear, just not to lose your place, but to lose it there is very easy because public control there is not an empty phrase.
    What do we see in Russia? There was no social contract here, no, and no one is foreseen. Power in the country was the fruit of protests against the communists, they say everyone but the Communists. As a result, the public distanced themselves from making decisions, leaving them to a group of people with nothing and not so close to democracy apparatchiks and bandits who built the state for themselves beloved by exposing ordinary people (out of brackets). You do not need to look here for the machinations of the State Department or the CIA, it was ordinary people who did everything themselves with their indifference and indifference to eat their own destiny strany.I But when we put a saddle on his back and sat down on the people to realize that something is not here to see prices.
  16. Dimy4
    Dimy4 20 May 2013 10: 32 New
    И у меня вопрос. Почему глядя на упомянутого в 3 пункте гражданина хочется схватиться за вилы? Может я один такой и сходить в больничку? Но мне почемуто кажется, что подобных "поклонников" у него уже много.
  17. My address
    20 May 2013 11: 01 New
    Questions still car with a small truck.
    For example:
    Why is Belarus according to the human development index at the 50 place, and Russia only at the 55 place? This is despite the fact that the GDP per person in Russia is twice as high. It's simple. We have a wild income stratification of society. And a significant part of the domestic product goes not to the country and people, but to the enemies / enemies in the form of gold and foreign exchange reserves - thanks to the faithful Gaidar Kudrin and others.
    And questions appear as familiar with the open information. Thanks to Soviet education, in which many teachers taught not only to memorize, but also to think and analyze. Memory and knowledge is a necessary mininum, and in the ability to draw conclusions is from aerobatics. Now there is almost no learning, there’s no time, it’s necessary to cram.
    But to write everything at once is undesirable, the impression will be smeared
  18. My address
    20 May 2013 11: 31 New
    And more.
    Almost the topic.
    Think about it.
    Why does Alexander Romanov, the marshal and the moderator, have only one rating?
    Often criticizes the authorities? If so, then sad. Criticism is unpleasant, even fair, but without it, any education stops in development or goes into a dressing.
    I will constantly ply him.
    1. Canep
      Canep 20 May 2013 11: 56 New
      I am already tired of plying it, it does not help. A rating of 1 means most likely that he is the first.
      1. Igarr
        Igarr 20 May 2013 12: 35 New
        Moderators do not criticize the authorities.
        They have their own power.
        Therefore, such a rating. Where to jump even higher? The Generalissimo of the entire Galaxy on the forum is not and is not expected.
        Cheating and fraud - all this democracy.
        Voters choose a specific person. But they cannot recall him back.
        Parties - choose from their ranks. They can withdraw, they can remove. But no party will consider complaints from citizens against its members. Do you know about such complaints?
        Damn, every worker, student, etc. have your own personal SNILS, TIN.
        The number of computers (in the broad sense) is three to four times greater than the number of citizens with the right to vote.
        Instead of a show with webcams at polling stations, they would put scanners of SNILS and the voting result.
        Поставили бы систему отслеживания "одобрения-неодобрения" персоналий.
        Набрал 100 тысяч "черных шаров" - вон из властных структур.
        This is skeletal so, basting. It seems that something is being done in this regard, or just going to?
        The point is, until we can recall the Officials ... then we can’t do anything.
        But there is no hope for our State Duma.
        As well as the guarantors. There were two. And one - so generally in two versions - before ... and after.
        Только вот "..а воз и ныне там."
        1. YuDDP
          YuDDP 21 May 2013 22: 15 New
          Quote: Igarr
          Instead of a show with webcams at polling stations, they would put scanners of SNILS and the voting result.

          Then Churov will remain without work. You can’t ...
    2. baltika-18
      baltika-18 20 May 2013 14: 49 New
      Quote: My address
      Why does Alexander Romanov, the marshal and the moderator, have only one rating?

      Because it has exceeded one million. Where more?
  19. optimist
    optimist 20 May 2013 14: 02 New
    There is one simple and concrete answer to all these questions: the entire population of the USSR stupidly missed ... their future and the future of their children 25 years ago. As they say: having removed their head, they don’t cry through their hair.
  20. Begemot
    Begemot 20 May 2013 14: 17 New
    Faced with legislation every day (not with criminal, but with economic law), I can confidently say: our deputies do not know what the LAW is and how the legislation affects the life of the country. In the 16-17 centuries, England and Spain were developmentally comparable states, but the countries went different ways, their legislation (especially tax) began to differ more and more. The result is obvious, but by historical standards, very little time has passed. Our deputies stamp thousands of documents and no one is studying how the situation in the country changes after the adoption of certain laws. The opinion of the expert community is completely ignored, not to mention the opinion of the people.
  21. Gardamir
    Gardamir 20 May 2013 14: 38 New
    В том и суть, демократии и капитализма, что никто никому ничего не должен. Девиз капитализма,"кто хапнул, тот и прав."
  22. Ruslan_F38
    Ruslan_F38 20 May 2013 16: 17 New
    The article put a plus. Only these questions should be asked by investigators of the UK and the Prosecutor's Office.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. Best novel
    Best novel 20 May 2013 16: 59 New
    Вопросы в никуда.Или это вопросы президенту?Так он план по ответам на этот год выполнил.И смысла о чем-то сейчас его спрашивать нет.А если(очень маловероятно-скорее утопия)каждый высокопоставленный чиновник(губернатор,мэр,президент в конце концов)спросит у своих избирателей:"А сегодня Вы мне доверяете?"и даст возможность ответить всем желающим и мало того-прислушается и при полном недоверии подаст в отставку-вот это будет демократия.Сказка,в которую хочется верить.
  25. combat192
    combat192 20 May 2013 17: 11 New
    Any democracy leads to the dictatorship of scum. Alfred Nobel
  26. luka095
    luka095 20 May 2013 19: 37 New
    Naturally, the president should answer these questions (as well as many others). If he is silent (otherwise he does not know about such issues), then he does not want to answer. And why does not want to - this is also a question.
  27. Const
    Const 20 May 2013 22: 01 New
    В некоторой сказке (или фантастическом романе) было сказано - : А потом тебя люди судить будут. А потом и поговорим..." Так может попробовать организовать официальный, юридически легитимный суд над всеми лицами, занявшими выборные должности. Виновен - по всей родне конфискация и 10 лет, нет, льготы пожизненно. Мне кажется, всё от того что нет наказания за обман людей (электорат). Обещал - не выполнил, в тюрьму. Может кто задумается?
  28. bilgesez
    bilgesez 20 May 2013 22: 37 New
    Give the Russian Revolution.
    NOBODY EXCEPT US 20 May 2013 23: 27 New
    And you ask the president all these questions ... Just stock up with a fork, remove noodles from your ears, for example, on a straight line ....... well, do not forget the bucket .... for noodles ... then you will feed your family for a whole year ....
  30. rpek32
    rpek32 21 May 2013 02: 58 New
    One YouTube blogger offered a rather interesting voting system (I can’t find the source, the link is lost forever)
    Суть в следующем: на данный момент, чиновники утверждают "выбери меня, я тебе сделаю то-то и то-то",
    а этот блоггер предлагал такой вариант: чиновники отчитываются о проделанной работе "я сделал то, то и то, буду делать дальше но нужна твоя поддержка" и только потом их избирают.
    The essence is sketched very rudely, but as they say, as I understand it.
  31. gladiatorakz
    gladiatorakz 23 May 2013 11: 24 New
    Thanks to the author! In the top ten! These are sober people and must take power from the liquid patriots. Only without revolutions. And quiet. On the principle of the Cossack Circle or Mock law.