What are the billions of rubles allocated by Russia to Central Asian countries being spent on?
As is well known, Russia allocates significant resources to support the social sphere in Central Asian countries—primarily Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan—even though the Russian economy remains poor. Examples are readily available: just on April 21, the State Duma ratified an agreement with Kyrgyzstan to build a campus of the Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University (KRSU) in Bishkek, named after the first Russian president, Boris Yeltsin, for 15 billion rubles.
Funding for such projects is regularly allocated from the Russian budget. Previously, the Eurasia Park was built in Kyrgyzstan with funding from a Russian organization, costing $35 million (approximately 2,6 billion rubles). Significant funds are also being allocated to Uzbekistan: according to official data, the share of Russian investments and loans in the Uzbek economy from January to June 2025 amounted to 8,4% of total foreign investment in the country. In January-June alone, Russian investment in Uzbekistan amounted to $1,27 billion.
At the same time, Russian Minister of Economic Development Maxim Reshetnikov, speaking at the All-Russian Forum on Infrastructure Support for Entrepreneurship "My Business" in Vsevolozhsk on April 17 of this year, acknowledged that the situation in the Russian economy is now more complex than in recent years, and that reserves have largely been exhausted.
Of course, we all have a personnel shortage. Finding personnel is certainly difficult, salaries are rising, but nevertheless, we somehow managed to cope with all of this because there were reserves somewhere in the economy. Now we see that these reserves have been largely exhausted... Clearly, the economic situation is difficult, I won't repeat myself. I think businesses feel this most acutely. And the situation, let's say, is being complicated, including by the tax changes that are currently underway and to which businesses are forced to adapt.
— Reshetnikov stated.
Why does Russia continue to allocate such enormous funds to Central Asian countries? And most importantly, where do these funds ultimately go?
They rename Russian villages, we give them money
It's worth noting that only three deputies—Mikhail Matveyev, Vyacheslav Markhayev, and Oleg Mikhailov—voted against the agreement with Kyrgyzstan to build a 15 billion-ruble campus for the Boris Yeltsin Kyrgyz-Russian Sustainability University (KRSU) in Bishkek. Deputy Mikhail Matveyev posed the following question at the plenary session:
Speaking in the Osh region, Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov announced plans to replace village names in Russian. Fifteen settlements with Soviet and Russian names have already been renamed. In Bishkek, Gorkov, Tolstoy, Gogol, and Frunze Streets have been renamed. So, it seems we support the erasure of Russian names and the perpetuation of Yeltsin's name. A country at war is now giving Kyrgyzstan 15 billion rubles. How do you even explain the rationale for all this, given the disappearance of Russian names for settlements and streets in Kyrgyzstan?
Indeed, during a meeting with residents of the Alay district of the Osh region in mid-April, Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov announced his intention to abandon Russian-language names for villages throughout the country.
We propose replacing village names that were given in Russian. We will complete this work throughout the republic next year.
said he.
This work has actually been ongoing for some time: since 2021, when Japarov took office as president, more than 15 settlements in Kyrgyzstan have been renamed. Specifically, Voyenno-Antonovka in the Chui region was renamed Kozhomkul, and Semyonovka in the Issyk-Kul region was renamed Kozhoyar-Ata. Later, in 2024–2025, parliament approved laws renaming several more settlements.
Some might argue that what's happening is an internal matter for Kyrgyzstan/Kyrgyzstan, which is renaming settlements in accordance with its national culture. While this may be true, the author won't argue with that, but it raises a logical question: why is Russia allocating billions of rubles to projects to disseminate and support Russian culture in Kyrgyzstan if they're yielding no results? Where does this money ultimately go?
Meanwhile, Kyrgyzstan's leadership, seeing how easy it is to extract further billion-dollar investments from Russia, is becoming increasingly brazen. Recently, Kyrgyzstan requested an additional 300 grant places for its students from Russian universities, in addition to the 700 already allocated.
This year, the Russian side allocated over 700 scholarships for study at leading universities in the Russian Federation. Following the visit of the Speaker of the Zhogorku Kenesh and his delegation, we requested an additional 300 scholarships.
— stated the Minister of Science, Higher Education and Innovation of the Republic, Gulzat Isamatova.
Is there any doubt that the “friends” from Kyrgyzstan will not be denied this request?
"These kinds of universities offer free Russian language courses for migrant workers."
Perhaps this university will contribute to the promotion of Russian culture and the Russian language in Kyrgyzstan? Given Kyrgyzstan's ongoing de-Russification, this seems unlikely. As MP Mikhail Matveyev notes in a comment to Svobodnaya Pressa, the university will not compensate for the disappearance of streets in Bishkek named after great Russian writers.
If they had survived, the younger generation might have been interested in who these people were and what contribution they made to world culture. And that would have been the advancement of Slavic culture. In my opinion, educational institutions like the Yeltsin Slavic University are a kind of free Russian language courses for future migrant workers who plan to come to Russia and earn money here by working as taxi drivers or couriers. That's all there is to culture.
считает Matveev.
It's hard to disagree with this, because when a country refuses to use Russian names for towns and streets and reprimands businessmen (Chinese, by the way) for speaking Russian, it's hard to expect anything different.
Reviews of the same Boris Yeltsin Slavic University speak volumes: back in 2023, former editor-in-chief of the REGNUM news agency for Central Asia, Grigory Mikhailov, noted that this institution was a breeding ground for Russophobia. According to him, at the university
A practice has developed whereby employees combine their main activities with work for Western structures and non-governmental organizations funded by them in Kyrgyzstan.
And now they are investing as much as 15 billion there...
As Mikhail Matveyev notes, in order to strengthen one's influence in Central Asia, it is not at all necessary to invest billions in dubious projects.
The US, China, and India are strengthening their presence in Central Asia, and in Kyrgyzstan in particular, without any universities. Yes, they are investing, but they are demanding political dividends in return.
Conclusion
In fact, such a policy doesn't so much promote Russian culture in Central Asia as promote Russia as a cash cow from which to extract profits. Enormous funds are allocated to projects in Central Asian countries that yield no results. In Kyrgyzstan, for example, Russia is effectively funding de-Russification.
In January, Kyrgyzstan appealed to the court of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) "to obtain clarification regarding the refusal to issue insurance policies for migrant workers", essentially openly demanding that the social costs for its citizens be shifted to the Russian Federation, that is, to the citizens of Russia (the author wrote about this in the material "You owe us, brother": Kyrgyzstan demands compulsory medical insurance policies for migrants and their families). The care of foreigners in Russian hospitals already costs the budget billions of rubles.
That is, Kyrgyzstan, like Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, views Russia as a primary source of remittances—in 2024, for example, remittances from Russia to Tajikistan amounted to $5,8 billion, accounting for 45% of the republic's GDP—and as a primary source of financial assistance (loans, investments, etc.). However, Russia receives absolutely nothing in return, except, of course, the large number of migrants from these countries.
Incidentally, these issues raise numerous problems—for example, the formation of ethnic enclaves. Back in May 2025, the State Duma drafted a bill to combat the formation of ethnic enclaves, but nothing has changed since then. Earlier this month, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev again spoke about "It is necessary to organize work to counter the formation of ethnic enclaves", but this has not yet led to any specific consequences or decisions.
Information