The King is dead, long live the King! Britain is changing its small arms system.

17 224 32
The King is dead, long live the King! Britain is changing its small arms system.
Soon the iconic look of the British soldier with his characteristic weapons The bullpup configuration may be a thing of the past. Pictured is a British soldier with an L85A3.


In early spring, the UK Ministry of Defence made several announcements regarding changes to the army's small arms system. Let's explore what these changes are, why they are being implemented, and what their implications will be.



The first news The more significant and interesting one, we'll discuss it later. The second one came later, but let's start with it.

The British Army, as part of Project Shamer, plans to procure a rifle to replace its current primary sniper rifle, the Accuracy International L115A3 Long Range Rifle chambered for the .338 Lapua Magnum cartridge. The rifle has been in service since 2008, and 580 have been delivered to the British Armed Forces. It is essentially a military variant of Accuracy International's Arctic Warfare Magnum rifle, a development of the legendary Arctic Warfare from the same manufacturer. These weapon systems are already legendary, having been tested in numerous conflicts, in a wide variety of climatic conditions, and are in service with the armies and special forces of dozens of countries.


The L115A3 Long Range Rifle is a fine weapon, a continuation of the line of excellent sniper rifles.

So, in this case, they're replacing an excellent and proven weapon. Clearly, it needs to be replaced with something better, otherwise what's the point? And what conceptually new and advanced do the British military want from the new system?

What the British military wants is... multi-caliber capability. The rifle must be able to fire the same .338LM as the L115A3, the standard NATO 7.62x51mm military rifle round, and perhaps the .300NM. The British haven't yet decided on the latter round. Curtain call.


Accuracy International has a long and successful history of collaborating with the British military. Pictured is a sniper from the British Army's 1st Parachute Battalion in Kosovo with an L96 rifle.

There's just one question: why? And there's no answer. The specifications aren't yet competitively priced, just preliminary. In other words, the tender has only just been announced, and the potential buyer is simply notifying its intent, with all the details of the future procurement not being disclosed. Only the approximate (estimated) cost of the project is known for certain: 20 million pounds sterling or 26,7 million US dollars. In other words, the procurement documentation doesn't answer the question: why would a purely sniper weapon need the functionality of a designated marksman munition, which solves conceptually different tasks at a different level and in different combat situations.


A picture to help you understand what kind of ammunition we're talking about.

A cost-cutting project? Definitely not; the system will only end up being more expensive. Replacing two or more systems in the military's arsenal at once? Also no; according to official information, the new system will only replace one rifle. The desire to have some kind of universal snipers with a universal "tool" for all occasions? Perhaps, although it's already generally accepted that 7.62x51 caliber designated marksman systems are self-loading. What a sniper pair trained to shoot at a distance of a kilometer would do with a bolt-action rifle chambered for a rifle-machine gun cartridge is unclear.

The first information about the project was published back in the spring of 2025. Weapon selection and testing are expected to continue throughout this year, with the winner to be announced next year, in 2027. This is all theoretical, of course, assuming deadlines are met, funding is approved on time, etc. The contract covers the delivery of not only the weapon itself but also a full set of accessories, silencers, bipods, carrying cases, and service throughout the weapon's service life. It will likely be after 2027 that the British plan to use the three-caliber sniper rifle will become clear.


An Enfield EM-2 during army trials in the first half of the 1950s. To say the weapon was revolutionary in concept for its time would be an understatement. But it never made it into service. History It's long and sad, and in defense of the British, one can only say that the Americans did a bit of dirty work for them here.

The second piece of news, which actually hit the news scene a little earlier, is more interesting. It also concerns the British Armed Forces' small arms system, specifically its core and backbone—the main battle/assault rifle. The British Ministry of Defence announced that, through Project Grayburn, it aims to select a replacement for the legendary SA80 (the L85) by 2030 and replace it with a new assault rifle.

The Grayburn project has been discussed before, but there was a period when it seemed more dead than alive. In fact, no funding decisions have been made yet. The Ministry of Defense has essentially simply indicated that it's not abandoning the idea. Therefore, many project details remain unknown, as they simply don't exist yet. For example, the military hasn't yet decided whether to retain the weapon's current 5.56×45mm caliber or consider the new-fangled 6.8×51mm Common Cartridge, which the US Army is already transitioning to.


Three generations of British bullpups: the L85A2 itself, the experimental XL64E5 (almost a direct ancestor of the SA80), and the aforementioned EM-2. Some say the L85A2 is more German than English, but there's no denying it...

One thing is clear: the islanders have finally decided to stop "digging up the stewardess" and bury the SA80 project. In this article, I've used the term "legendary" twice in relation to weapons systems. Well, legendary status can be achieved in different ways. And the SA80's legendary status is completely different from the L96's.

The creation of the British state-owned Royal Small Arms Factory, built using the then-fashionable bullpup design, began entering service in 1985. The project, in one form or another, chambered for various ammunition, had been in development since the 1960s. Its progenitor was the Enfield EM-2. After the triumphant adoption of the SA80, the Royal Small Arms Factory folded in 1988, and production was transferred to the Nottingham Small Arms Facility.


Soldiers of C Company, 1st Battalion, Staffordshire Regiment, 1st British Armoured Division, in the Iraqi desert in January 1991. The soldiers didn't take to the new rifle, fortunately the war was short-lived.

The weapon almost immediately earned a reputation for being finicky and poorly functioning. Complaints about the new weapon poured in from units and subunits. This could all be attributed to the soldiers simply not being accustomed to it and not having mastered it... But the weapon was supposedly designed using a proven gas-powered design. Plus, in 1991, the British military took part in Operation Desert Storm, and the flood of complaints about the weapon system, which was no longer a novelty, turned into a tsunami. It got to the point that British gunsmiths in the late 1990s admitted their inability to perfect the rifle and bowed to the Germans. Heckler & Koch specialists spent 2000 to 2002 refining the system and apparently succeeded. Officially, at least, the reliability issues, if not completely resolved, were at least less acute.


You take apart an AR-18 and an L85A2... They're all very similar. One works, the other not so much. Well, admittedly, the L85A2 has already been "polished" by the Germans, so it seems to work too... But that's not certain.

Where the British went wrong isn't entirely clear. The progenitor, or rather, the forefather of the concept itself, the Enfield EM-2, apparently didn't have any serious reliability issues. Most of the SA80's design was clearly borrowed from Stoner's AR-18, which also had no such reliability issues. So, they're a real genius, but in the wrong place.


British special forces long ago decided that standard army rifles weren't quite right for them. Pictured is a Royal Marine Commando with an M-16 during fighting in the Malvinas Islands.

In fact, the process of a slow-moving replacement has already been underway, and for some time now. Back in 2000, when the Germans were only promising to revive the SA80, the Colt Canada C7 (C8SFW) variant of the Canadian Arch was adopted. This carbine, most similar to the American M4, was designated the L119A1 and has been the mainstay of various British special forces for a quarter of a century. And in 2023, the Ministry of Defence went even further and adopted the KS-1 rifle from the American arms manufacturer Knight's Armament Company. Designated the L403A1, it is not an addition to the arsenal or an elite weapon, but is intended to completely replace the SA80's descendants in the British Royal Marines and the Ranger Regiment (yes, the British have had their own Rangers since 2021).


The "Canadian M4" variant was followed by a full-size rifle, the L119A2. Pictured again is a Royal Marine commando with an L119A2.

Overall, colossal changes are coming to the small arms system. For starters, the SA80 required a change to the regulations, as some drill commands with the bullpup couldn't be performed as with a full-size rifle. Now, it seems, they'll have to change them back. It's still unclear what cartridge it will be chambered for, when it will be completed, or how much it will cost. It's clear that it will most likely be an AR system, and very likely not a British design. Apparently, the officials in the building on Whitehall are well aware of this, as they immediately announced that one of the key conditions of the contract is that all rifles be manufactured in the UK. The Ministry of Defence proudly announced that localizing foreign production or expanding local manufacturing will create 100 to 150 jobs. England is losing the remnants of its own weapons school, but 150 workers will be assembling American "Arks" or Czech "Brens" (the press is also listing the Czechs as replacements for the SA80)... That's the news from Foggy Albion.


And this is the L403A1 in the hands of a British Ranger in 2024. Apparently, this isn't the last AR system in the British arsenal.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    April 24 2026 03: 24
    A bayonet on a bullpup rifle carried by a soldier from C Company, 1st Battalion, Staffordshire Regiment (pictured in Iraq) is certainly powerful. laughing
    Well, as for the rest, whatever they amuse themselves with, as they say, let them hang themselves! Yes Let's see what the Brits come up with.
    1. +4
      April 24 2026 11: 52
      Quote: Hunter 2
      A bayonet on a bullpup rifle carried by a soldier from C Company, 1st Battalion, Staffordshire Regiment (pictured in Iraq) is certainly powerful.

      3 options:
      1. "That's how it's supposed to be - and it doesn't matter!"
      2. "So that it is visible to avoid loss in the military manner!"
      3. "So that in the photo you look dashing and menacing!" smile
    2. +2
      April 24 2026 17: 09
      That is, the procurement documentation does not answer the question: why does a purely sniper weapon need the functionality of using designated marksman ammunition, which solves conceptually different tasks at a different level and in different combat situations?
      Generally speaking, different missions require different ammunition, and snipers generally prefer to have a separate cartridge for each shot. I don't think standardization is feasible here, as it's impossible in principle. Yes, for company and platoon snipers armed with standard weapons like the SVD, general-purpose ammunition is the norm, but this article is about high-end sniper rifles, where high-quality marksmanship is paramount, and standards simply cannot exist.
  2. 0
    April 24 2026 10: 04
    This is already becoming a "good" tradition. Nobody needs either the L85A2 or the FAMAS. Almost every time you see a NATO soldier in a photo, they're holding one of the M4 variants. Damn it, we've come to this.
  3. +1
    April 24 2026 10: 40
    The capabilities of modern firearms are nearing their limits, and radical improvements are not forthcoming. Therefore, replacing barrels can only be seen as a way to cut into the budget and support local manufacturers to preserve their expertise.
    .
    Lobaev, with his remote-controlled sniper rifle, is demonstrating the right path for rifle development. His athletic background and passion for breaking records have weighed heavily on him, which is why he's only produced a sporting weapon, not a combat one. But he deserves praise here, followed by the correct technical specifications and payment in advance!
    For now, even a couple hundred of Lobaev's current systems could have a significant impact on the front lines. And if the software is properly modified...
    1. +2
      April 24 2026 11: 53
      Quote: also a doctor
      Lobaev, with his remote-controlled sniper rifle, demonstrates the correct path for developing marksmanship. His athletic background and passion for breaking records have weighed heavily on him, leading him to issue a competition weapon rather than a combat one.

      The army is wary of Lobaev, IMHO, after his previous approach to ammunition. Back then, he made excellent custom rifles, but when he moved to even small production runs, the quality plummeted. If I remember correctly, there were photos of the Hansa rifle after unpacking, showing a chamber with burrs.
  4. +3
    April 24 2026 11: 09
    England is losing the remnants of its own weapons school, but 150 workers will be assembling American "Arks" or Czech "Brens" (the press is also listing Czechs as SA80 replacements)...

    What can we do? If the school is such that it hasn't been able to do anything worthwhile for decades. It's us who are so obsessed with our VAZ...
    1. 0
      April 25 2026 17: 12
      So they run around with their SA-80

      And the VAZ Vesta is a good car.
      1. 0
        April 25 2026 18: 06
        Quote: Kull90
        And the VAZ Vesta is a good car.

        laughing good
      2. 0
        April 26 2026 10: 27
        Quote: Kull90
        VAZ Vesta is a good car.

        You forgot to add "was" (until 2022) and "for its class"
        1. 0
          April 26 2026 11: 01
          And now it's a normal car, it goes from point A to point B without breaking down.
          1. 0
            April 26 2026 13: 50
            Quote: Kull90
            it's full to go from point A to point B does not break

            Oh really?))
            1. 0
              April 26 2026 17: 11
              A friend of mine has no problems with it; he bought it about 5 years ago.
              1. +1
                April 26 2026 18: 30
                Colleague, you are extremely inattentive.
                I wrote:
                Quote: Senior Sailor
                "was" (until 2022)

                and you
                Quote: Kull90
                I bought it about 5 years ago

                5 years ago it was 2021)))
                And I, too, regret that I got a Granta instead of a Vesta in '19. But who knew I wouldn't be able to change it after five years...
                But that's not the point. The Vesta, the Granta, and, God forgive me, the Iskra—they're all B-class cars. They're analogs of the Logan, Solaris, and the like. Compared to them, even the Vesta is a car. But the attempt to take things one step further ended in a dud. And forgive me, but not everyone is satisfied with a pittance. There are people who need a modern, comfortable, and prestigious car. And that's where VAZ has no chance.
                But that's only half the problem. After all, our people are mostly poor, and a significant portion of the population would have been content with a Vesta, especially the one from before 22. But the hell of it: sanctions hit, and it turned out that, despite all the talk about import substitution, our seemingly homespun and thoroughly domestic cars are so only in name, while in reality, their assembly requires a huge number of parts and mechanisms that our country simply can't produce!
                To keep production going, they had to rush to mass-produce the homeless versions of the Grants and Nivas, which are a sight to behold, and also search the world (which has shrunk to the size of China) for components for the Vesta, which they mockingly called "New Age." And the quality of the resulting automotive product, judging by the stories of acquaintances who work at service stations, is quite so-so.
                So it turns out that our auto industry is now like the aircraft industry under the Tsar. If they give us engines, we'll build an Ilya Muromets! If they don't, we'll build a hot air balloon at most!
                1. +1
                  April 26 2026 19: 33
                  So it turns out the iPhone is Chinese after all?

                  Everyone has different preferences. I'm happy with my Lada Granta. I don't live in my car. For me, it's just a means of transportation. I'm not interested in smelling plastic or trying it on my teeth like some people do. If the car runs well and doesn't break down like my Lada Granta, it's a good car.

                  Every car in the world has parts from all over the world, this is called globalization

                  And your slogans don't interest me, in my opinion Vesta and Granta are good cars.
                  1. 0
                    April 26 2026 22: 54
                    Quote: Kull90
                    So it turns out the iPhone is Chinese after all?

                    There are various companies in China, and the quality of their products varies. AvtoVAZ doesn't buy from the best.
                    Quote: Kull90
                    I'm satisfied with the grant

                    When I got it, the kids were relatively small. They've grown in seven years; one is six feet tall, the other is almost six feet tall. So the car is a bit small now, and buying a new one is... problematic. For the price of a well-equipped Vesta back in 19, you could have gotten... well, I don't know... a Tiguan, maybe.
                    Quote: Kull90
                    Every car in the world has parts from all over the world, this is called globalization

                    But there is a difference between Japanese and French ones, as before, and the most obscene quality Chinese ones, as now.
                    Quote: Kull90
                    your slogans

                    Well, if facts are slogans for you...
                    Quote: Kull90
                    In my opinion, Vesta and Granta are good cars.

                    The amplifier will not turn off while driving. request
                    But in principle, I don’t mind. They’re good. There were before.
                    Colleague, I already understand that you haven’t seen anything better and don’t want anything better, but I haven’t lost hope yet. feel
                    1. 0
                      April 27 2026 15: 39
                      In 2026, you won't get a Tiguan for that kind of money, and when you bought the Tiguan, you paid for the Pukrah weaponry.

                      Maybe it was before, but now there is no difference

                      What facts did you provide?

                      I haven't encountered any amplifier problems.
                      In 2018, Volkswagen announced a worldwide recall of over 700 Tiguan vehicles with a panoramic roof, manufactured before July 5. The defect involved poorly sealed seals that allowed moisture to enter the LED interior lighting module. This could lead to a burning smell, lighting module failure, and vehicle fire.

                      Yes, I won't be able to buy an AURUS, and I'm not interested in the rest, I don't jerk off to cars.
                      1. 0
                        April 28 2026 12: 29
                        Quote: Kull90
                        In 2026, you won't get a Tiguan for that kind of money.

                        This is sad
                        Quote: Kull90
                        And when you bought a Tiguan, you paid for the Pukrah weaponry

                        So, if I buy a Chinese Volks, I'll support Zelensky?
                        Oh well...
                        And who will I support when buying Vesta?
                        A greedy manager who reasons in the style of "it's possible, but why?"
                        This is also not a promising prospect.
                        Quote: Kull90
                        What facts did you provide?

                        About the real state of current VAZ production.
                        But about "pukru" these are really just slogans.
                        Quote: Kull90
                        Volkswagen announced a recall

                        So you heard about this, but when the amplifier died on the brand new Vesta, you immediately covered your ears?
                        This, sir, is hypocrisy.
                        And you see what the matter is. The fact that the Germans have problems doesn't make VAZ any better.
                        Quote: Kull90
                        I'm not interested in the rest

                        Yes, of course. It's impossible to describe the taste of chocolate to someone who has never tasted anything sweeter than carrots.
                      2. 0
                        3 May 2026 20: 39
                        in the ass Tiguan

                        When you buy a Vesta, you will also pay into the budget, and this includes: roads, hospitals, schools
                        When buying a Volkswagen, pay for the weapon with a Pukram (Volkswagen (VW) CEO Oliver Blume stated that the concern is "open" to the production of military equipment at its factories.)

                        And here, covering one's ears, this example shows that problems arise with almost all manufacturers (The management of the largest Japanese automaker, Toyota Motor, decided to recall about 580 thousand cars in Japan.
                        The reason for the product recall was a malfunction in the braking system.

                        hypocrisy is thinking up things for others

                        You see how it turns out, I just expressed my opinion and that’s it, you’re trying to force something on me, why?
                        You are nobody to me and you have no name and your opinion is worthless
                      3. 0
                        4 May 2026 08: 25
                        I see you thought about it for a long time?)))
                        Quote: Kull90
                        When you buy a Vesta, you will also pay into the budget, and this includes: roads, hospitals, schools

                        And also to the Chinese, who supply many parts for this supposedly domestic car.
                        While purchasing a Chinese Volkswagen will send some money to China, it will also finance the Russian budget. This is primarily due, of course, to the absolutely insane duties and fees.
                        That is, in both cases, the money goes into the same pockets, it’s just that in one case the car will bring its owner much less hassle.
                        Quote: Kull90
                        This example shows that problems arise with almost all manufacturers.

                        No. This example says that normal Manufacturers monitor the quality of their products and recall machines themselves which are only can be found to be flawed.
                        Meanwhile, our own AvtoVAZ is doing everything it can to avoid admitting its real flaws. Take, for example, the story of the brand-new Iskra, which recently joined the Za Rulem magazine fleet. A malfunction in it was refused as a warranty claim.
                        Do you feel the difference? And there are many, many such cases!
                        Quote: Kull90
                        You see how it works

                        I see. You're trying to force your point of view on me, even though all your arguments are the fruit of your own ignorance.
                        Quote: Kull90
                        You are nobody to me and you have no name

                        And you are like the princess from "An Ordinary Miracle"
                        - You didn't get off your horse for three days to tell me how indifferent I am to you?))) lol

                        All the best
                      4. 0
                        4 May 2026 10: 53
                        work

                        Better to the Chinese for a small number of parts, Vesta Russian car, Chinese parts are also on the F-35 fighter jets (According to the documents reviewed, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) is examining three cases of the use of Chinese parts on the American next-generation F-35 fighter jet. The GAO report on this issue will be ready by March 1, 2014. American lawmakers who requested its preparation stated that they are concerned about the displacement of American companies from the market for metals and alloys with special properties, as well as the fact that American weapons may depend on components produced by a future potential adversary.)

                        In August 2025, it was reported that AvtoVAZ announced a recall of Lada Vesta vehicles due to a problem in the steering system that could cause the steering wheel to lock while driving.
                        The company planned to check and, if necessary, change the software of the electronic module responsible for locking the steering system.
                        The campaign planned to provide free steering repairs on Lada Vesta models to prevent unplanned steering wheel locks on second-generation vehicles.
                        They lied again, not a day goes by without a lie.

                        So you're the one trying to prove something to me by constantly lying.
                      5. 0
                        4 May 2026 15: 48
                        Quote: Kull90
                        work

                        Congratulations.
                        Quote: Kull90
                        In August 2025, it was reported that AvtoVAZ announced a recall of Lada Vesta vehicles due to a problem in the steering system that could cause the steering wheel to lock while driving.

                        Yeah. After the media scandal surrounding the accident.
                        Quote: Kull90
                        they lied again

                        https://www.zr.ru/content/articles/978543-lada-iskra-iz-parka-za-rulem/
                        The new car was deemed out of warranty, even though they understood that the car magazine had a huge readership...
                        I don't want to wish you ill, but if you try contacting the warranty department, you'll learn a lot of new things))
                        Quote: Kull90
                        So you're the one trying to prove something to me.

                        You're wrong, I realized a long time ago that you're impenetrable)))
                        And all the best again
                      6. -2
                        4 May 2026 16: 04
                        I'm right
                        Vesta and Granta are good cars.

                        Why do I need to go to the warranty department if the car is in good working order and I have no problems with the steering wheel?

                        I have a friend whose automatic transmission broke on his Audi. He fixed it, of course, I didn't say anything to him. But when a light bulb burned out on my Lada Granta, he said, "But it's an automatic transmission."
                      7. 0
                        4 May 2026 16: 20
                        Quote: Kull90
                        I'm right
                        Vesta and Granta are good cars.

                        If you'd even considered it, you'd have realized I was saying exactly the same thing. I only specified a time frame and that AvtoVAZ's product quality had seriously declined recently.

                        Quote: Kull90
                        Why do I need to go to the warranty department if the car is in good working order and I have no problems with the steering wheel?

                        So you don’t even have Vesta, but for some reason you’re telling people from other people’s words how wonderful she is.
                        You have a Granta, compared to which the Vesta is undoubtedly (especially if it was produced before 2022) a more modern and comfortable car. The only problem is that it was far from ideal before, and now it's become even more so.
                        a) worse and b) more expensive.
                        And any alternative other than Chinese is not available.
                        Quote: Kull90
                        I have a friend whose automatic transmission broke on his Audi.

                        This happens too, but
                        1) How old is she?
                        2) did he and the previous owners carry out scheduled maintenance on time and in full?
                        3) The Vesta doesn't have an automatic transmission at all! Only a continuously variable transmission. And while it used to be a Japanese unit, it's now a Chinese one.
                        No, if this is an achievement for you, then by all means. Why should I bother? I drive a Granta myself, so what do I know?
                      8. -2
                        4 May 2026 16: 47
                        The quality of AvtoVAZ cars is good

                        Vesta hasn't gotten worse, everything has gotten more expensive.

                        I didn't take care of it and I don't know what kind of work he did, it was 3 years old then, I don't really take care of the Lada Granta either, I just change the oil, I don't even paint over the scratches on the bumper, for me it's just a means of transportation and I'm quite comfortable

                        And where did I write about the automatic transmission on the Vesta, let alone present it as an achievement, or is it already unclear to you who you are talking to?
                2. +2
                  April 28 2026 11: 36
                  Quote: Senior Sailor
                  And the quality of the resulting automotive product, judging by the stories of acquaintances working at service stations, is quite so-so.

                  "May contain traces of a vehicle." smile
                  1. +2
                    April 28 2026 12: 29
                    Consult your doctor before use. feel
  5. +1
    April 24 2026 12: 32
    This means it's time to change the AK series 100 to 6,5mm cartridge.
  6. +4
    April 24 2026 13: 00
    Dear author!
    Let me correct you a bit. The EM-2 can hardly be considered even a distant ancestor of the SA80 family. Apart from the bullpup layout, they have practically nothing in common. They have different automatic systems, bolt locking systems, trigger and recoil mechanisms, and receiver designs.
    It's like saying the Accuracy International's distant ancestor is the Enfield SMLE. They share a common design—bolt-action rifles with detachable box magazines. But in other respects, they're completely different.
    As for the competition for a new assault rifle, it seems CZ is planning to participate in it not with "BREN", but with products from Colt Canada, which, after being purchased by the Czechs (or rather, the actual owners of CZ, and everything is quite complicated there), Colt now also belongs to the united concern.
  7. +1
    April 24 2026 21: 50
    The British have long been accustomed to fighting at the hands of others, so they don't care. And the natives can be driven around with shotguns.
  8. 0
    12 May 2026 06: 42
    На ютубе один захистник говорил, что профессия снайпера умирает, я с ним согласен, что армейский снайпер во взводе или выше уже не нужен, по крайней мере в текущей войне, подойти к противнику на 1.5 км уже большая задача и проблема, сделать мелкий выстрел тоже сразу не получается, тут нужны месяца тренировок на полигоне, а потом ещё этого снайпера надо обстрелять в бою, а после выстрела снайпера надо уйти, желательно целым, оператор дрона сделает все только лучше
  9. 0
    13 May 2026 19: 11
    Всё-таки менталитет играет роль немалую. Кто бы что ни говорил, но у немцев традиции, инженерная школа, стремление к точности и педантичности дали свои плоды и в оружейном деле. Хотя Кольт, Винчестер, Максим имели английские корни. Но после 2 мировой английская оружейная традиция постепенно деградировала, а ключевой точкой невозврата стало закрытие Королевской оружейной фабрики в Энфилде (RSAF) в 1988 году — места, где выпускалась легендарная винтовка Lee-Enfield.