The US Treasury has issued another license easing sanctions against our oil.

5 902 67
The US Treasury has issued another license easing sanctions against our oil.

The United States has issued a second general license temporarily easing sanctions against Russian oil. The OFAC document authorizes the delivery and sale of crude oil and petroleum products of Russian origin loaded onto tankers as of April 17, 2026. The license is valid for one month, until May 16, and replaces the previous one, which expired on April 11.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent explained the decision by saying Washington was addressing the requests of more than a dozen countries, which he described as the most vulnerable in terms of energy supplies. He stated that without this measure, global oil prices could have soared to $150 per barrel due to the fallout from the conflict with Iran and disruptions to supplies through the Strait of Hormuz.



US Secretary of Energy Chris Wright made a similar statement:

The extension is a pragmatic step following calls from G20 members to keep energy prices low.


Specific countries suffering from energy shortages and actively advocating for the extension of the American special license, as it turns out, include: first and foremost, India (the largest importer of Russian oil, dependent on supplies amid the crisis in the Middle East). Other Asian countries are also mentioned: China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and a number of developing countries experiencing severe energy shortages. However, neither the Philippines, Thailand, nor Sri Lanka are members of the G20.

The license does not apply to transactions involving Iran, Cuba, the DPRK, as well as Crimea, the DPR and LPR.

The decision was made against the backdrop of rising global oil prices and allows for the release of an additional 45-50 million barrels of Russian crude already at sea. Critics in the US Congress call this an undermining of the sanctions regime, but the administration emphasizes the temporary and targeted nature of the measure to stabilize the global energy market.

This raises the question of what global trade has become today. It turns out that a single state considers itself entitled to determine who can trade with whom, what, with whom, and in what currency. And other countries are forced to accept this and turn to it for permission to sell or buy. And this global "master" once again decides whether to grant such permission or not. After all, the special military operation was launched, in part, to ensure that there would no longer be any dictatorship, at least in global trade. At least, that's how it was previously described. But dictatorship and "masterly indulgences" exist, and today's news The US Treasury Department confirms this.
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    April 22 2026 21: 20
    I honestly don't understand anymore whether our oil is good or bad. My only wish for those who depend on it is that you drown in it already...
    1. +4
      April 22 2026 21: 36
      ...The US Treasury Department has issued another license easing sanctions against our oil...
      Are we supposed to clap our hands and throw our caps in the air?
      The US Treasury, Carl, USA, issues permission to buy and sell Russian oil!
      Did I miss something, since when did we become a colony?
      Mattress makers who have absolutely no relation to the country, nor to the production, nor to the transportation of oil dictate the conditions of what to do with it!
      1. +6
        April 22 2026 21: 40
        Quote: Andrey K
        Did I miss something, since when did we become a colony?


        From 1991 hi
        1. +5
          April 22 2026 22: 44
          More precisely, since 1993, when Yeltsin's Constitution of the Russian Federation, written by his bandits and American advisers, was adopted.
          1. +1
            April 23 2026 02: 54
            In poor Iran, 1 liter of gasoline costs 1 cent domestically, while in wealthy Russia, 1 liter of gasoline approaches $1. What a shitty and thieving leadership we have...
      2. +4
        April 22 2026 22: 13
        Quote: Andrey K
        The US Treasury, Carl, USA, issues permission to buy and sell Russian oil!

        But if we speak frankly, out loud, in the great and mighty, "to the address"?
        I wonder what they'll say about this? I wonder equally whether they'll seize a Russian-flagged tanker with a Russian crew if it's escorted by a warship.

        I heard something about "free trade" from our "young reformers" in the 90s... Or did I just imagine it when I was drunk?
        1. -1
          April 23 2026 02: 47
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          I heard something in the 90s from our "young reformers" about "free trade"...

          So "free trade" is for whom "free trade" is needed...
          1. 0
            April 23 2026 06: 19
            Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
            So "free trade" is for whom "free trade" is needed...

            Like, "Whose leg is this?" laughing
            "Everything for our own, the law for our enemies" laughing
          2. 0
            April 23 2026 17: 29
            Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
            So "free trade" is for whom "free trade" is needed...

            And he causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads; and no one might buy or sell except the one who had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
            1. -1
              April 24 2026 07: 54
              Quote: ettore
              Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
              So "free trade" is for whom "free trade" is needed...

              And he causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads; and no one might buy or sell except the one who had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

              Is this from some fantasy?
              1. -1
                April 24 2026 17: 09
                Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
                Is this from some fantasy?

                Banned from Google or Yandex? It's from the Bible.
                Revelation of John the Theologian (Apocalypse), Chapter 13
                1. 0
                  April 24 2026 18: 01
                  Quote: ettore
                  This is from the Bible.

                  Well, this is Jewish fantasy, based on which they are now carrying out genocide! A wonderful source. good
                  1. 0
                    April 24 2026 18: 17
                    Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
                    Well, this is Jewish fantasy, on the basis of which they are now carrying out genocide!

                    Interesting comparison, I liked it.
                    Wonderful source

                    But it describes what is happening with great precision, and there is still nothing better.
                    1. 0
                      April 25 2026 11: 44
                      Quote: ettore
                      But it describes what is happening with great precision.

                      What does it describe? Vague statements about human psychology (essence), strained to apply to any situation and any time. It could just as easily be stretched to include the Bhagavad Gita, the Epic of Gilgamesh, the Rig Veda... or even Tolkien's Silmarion!
                      Quote: ettore
                      and there is still nothing better.

                      There are many! From the works of Aristotle and Plato to Marx's Capital, which describes today's events not just "with high precision," but literally "down to the millimeter!"
                      And it seems to me that the source you're discussing, aside from the odd quote, you haven't even read in its entirety. I'm talking about the Torah, or the Tanakh, or the Old Testament... this collection of texts is called by different names...
                      1. +1
                        April 25 2026 15: 54
                        Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
                        And it seems to me that the source you are discussing, apart from the divergent quotes, you haven’t read in its entirety.

                        I've been fed this collection of fairy tales for 20 years now. I view religions as a technology for controlling people, from a purely practical standpoint.
      3. +4
        April 22 2026 22: 44
        The issue is different: they're not allowing us to sell it, but rather allowing those who want to buy it. Without permission, buyers face sanctions and tariffs. And apparently, the potential consequences of sanctions outweigh the potential benefits of trying to buy without regard for the FSA.
        1. -2
          April 23 2026 00: 20
          Quote: Metallurg_2
          The question is different: they don’t allow us to sell it, but rather they allow those who want to buy it.

          Who cares?
          1. -3
            April 23 2026 02: 49
            Quote: Stas157
            Who cares?

            The principle is that no one can forbid US anything...
            1. -3
              April 23 2026 17: 16
              Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
              The principle is that no one can forbid US anything...

              This is an indirect prohibition.
      4. +3
        April 22 2026 23: 47
        Quote: Andrey K
        The US Treasury, Carl, the US, is issuing permission to buy and sell Russian oil! Did I miss something?

        Yes, you missed the point – the license in question essentially means that the US Treasury Department is allowing American financial institutions to ignore US sanctions laws against those purchasing Russian oil. In other words, Bank of America, for example, is temporarily allowed not to block transactions and/or accounts of Indian Oil Corporation, which purchases Russian oil.
        This concerns Russia only indirectly.
        1. +1
          April 23 2026 08: 47
          But if this Indian corporation's accounts were held not at Bank of America but at VTB or Gazprombank, then the lack of permission could be ignored.
          But the Zionists sitting in the States and their agents of influence in our upper echelons will not allow this.
          1. +1
            April 23 2026 14: 30
            Quote: Metallurg_2
            if the accounts of this Indian corporation were held not at Bank of America but at VTB or Gazprombank

            If only... But reality is what it is and nothing else.

            Quote: Metallurg_2
            The Zionists sitting in the States and their agents of influence will not allow this

            Do you think the Zionists and their agents won't allow Russia to force India to pay through Gazprombank? Or maybe it's simpler—that Indian companies themselves decide where it's most convenient to keep their accounts and how to process payments? Especially since even if Indians pay for Russian oil through Russian or Indian banks, they still have accounts in American banks for trade with the United States—and these accounts could be subject to American sanctions as punishment for disobeying America.
            1. 0
              April 23 2026 22: 51
              Well, apparently the American market is more important to them than our oil.
              So maybe we should send them to America for oil, at $150 a barrel? How long will their pants last?
              1. -1
                April 23 2026 23: 18
                Quote: Metallurg_2
                So he might as well send them to America for oil, at 150 bucks a barrel.

                You can send someone. Or you can earn money. The first is more pleasant (but not certain). The second is more rational. In a situation where war consumes money, the choice between moral satisfaction and material gain is quite obvious.
                1. 0
                  April 24 2026 07: 53
                  The main thing is that the proceeds from the sale do not suddenly end up in accounts in unfriendly banks and do not go to help the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
                  1. 0
                    April 24 2026 12: 26
                    Quote: Metallurg_2
                    The main thing is that the money received from the sale does not suddenly end up in accounts in unfriendly banks.

                    After all, unfriendly states have already made sure that Russian money doesn't end up in unfriendly banks. It'll be a pain in the ass to deposit money in those banks now.
      5. -1
        April 23 2026 05: 53
        The dictator gets fired up and issues a license for his own salvation. This is some kind of non-sovereign absurdity.
    2. +3
      April 22 2026 22: 10
      Quote: Hunter 2
      I really don’t understand anymore whether our oil is good or bad?

      I seriously don't understand anymore: is our oil ours or not? And if not ours, then whose is it?
      1. 0
        April 22 2026 22: 24
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        Quote: Hunter 2
        I really don’t understand anymore whether our oil is good or bad?

        I seriously don't understand anymore: is our oil ours or not? And if not ours, then whose is it?

        I have a question too... so, unable to find an answer, I wished for everyone to drown in this oil. Maybe when they catch their breath, we'll find an answer... maybe it will actually come back to us. drinks
        1. +4
          April 22 2026 22: 27
          Quote: Hunter 2
          I wished for everyone to choke on this oil already. Maybe when they catch their breath, we'll find the answer...

          Whoever chokes is definitely not the master. drinks
        2. -5
          April 23 2026 02: 52
          Quote: Hunter 2
          You see, when they catch their breath, we’ll find the answer... maybe it will actually come back to us.

          Will oil return to the people? Because the people who currently control it will "die"? Do you seriously think THAT? wassat
          1. 0
            April 23 2026 04: 24
            Quote from: AllX_VahhaB

            Will oil return to the people? Because the people who currently control it will "die"? Do you seriously think THAT? wassat

            What's the question? That oil can change hands? Or that it can return to the people?
            Actually, it doesn’t matter, the answer is Yes to both questions.
            So, for development, look at how oil works for the benefit of Norwegians. I don't use the Gulf monarchies as an example on principle.
            1. -1
              April 23 2026 16: 01
              Quote: Hunter 2
              Quote from: AllX_VahhaB

              Will oil return to the people? Because the people who currently control it will "die"? Do you seriously think THAT? wassat

              What's the question? That oil can change hands? Or that it can return to the people?
              Actually, it doesn’t matter, the answer is Yes to both questions.
              So, for development, look at how oil works for the benefit of Norwegians. I don't use the Gulf monarchies as an example on principle.

              Aaaah... And I thought you were talking about changing the form of ownership of the means of production... But you're still harping on the same old liberal refrain about "right" and "wrong" capitalism. wassat
  2. -3
    April 22 2026 21: 27
    To avoid such a diktat, you need to be respected. How can you respect someone who, on the one hand, is conducting a joint military operation, while on the other, at every turn, proclaiming their readiness for dialogue with anyone, even the devil himself? How can you respect someone who expects, like manna from heaven, mediation in resolving a conflict from a country that supplies weapons to one of the parties to it? How can you respect a country that turned a blind eye to the downed helicopter and itself agreed to pay compensation for the allegedly downed plane?
    1. -4
      April 23 2026 02: 54
      Quote: taiga2018
      How to respect a country that turned a blind eye to the downed helicopter

      Are you talking about the Wagner Group's raid on Moscow? They shot down more than one helicopter there...
  3. +3
    April 22 2026 21: 30
    By evening, there was some good news: Kazakh oil will be supplied to Germany via other available routes, due to the technical capabilities of the Druzhba pipeline. What does that mean? "The Germans have refused Russian oil! That means their oil supply is fine," Novak said. tongue
    The EU's 20th sanctions package doesn't include a clause banning the transportation of oil from Russia by Western tankers. And what about the price cap? Europe, what are you doing? Maybe something big is brewing. We'll see what happens next. laughingWe are waiting - with Merz: Russia has no right to blackmail Germany.
  4. +2
    April 22 2026 21: 34
    Quote: Hunter 2
    I honestly don't understand anymore whether our oil is good or bad. My only wish for those who depend on it is that you drown in it already...

    But if you want to receive your pension from the budget, the public sector employees will not agree with your wishes.
    1. -4
      April 22 2026 23: 34
      In fact, this oil is killing our soldiers, officers and generals in the LBS.
      And civilians in the rear...
      It's hard for me to imagine Stalin shipping grain to Germany in 1942...
      1. +3
        April 23 2026 00: 09
        Quote: Vladimir M
        In fact, this oil is killing our soldiers, officers and generals in the LBS.

        In fact, the main goal of sanctions against Russia is to reduce its budget revenues in order to undermine the capabilities of the military-industrial complex. Western Russophobes constantly claim that by buying Russian energy resources, we are arming Putin's army—stop buying from Russia! And other countries are trying to limit their purchases of Russian raw materials for the same reason. These are the two sides of the coin.
      2. -3
        April 23 2026 03: 04
        Quote: Vladimir M
        It's hard for me to imagine Stalin shipping grain to Germany in 1942...

        What does Germany have to do with this? Are we at war with countries to whom we sell oil? Can you even imagine Stalin trading with Japan, Germany's ally? Japanese concessions in northern Sakhalin remained in effect until March 1944. So, Soviet oil and coal were regularly shipped to the Axis powers (also known as the German coalition, the Hitler coalition, or the Nazi bloc).
      3. +1
        April 23 2026 05: 04
        If we turn off the tap, soldiers will stop dying. They will die in even greater numbers.
    2. -1
      April 23 2026 17: 21
      Quote: tralflot1832
      But if you want to receive your pension from the budget, the public sector employees will not agree with your wishes.

      Are you saying that oil is the only source of money in Russia, that salaries, pensions, and the SVO depend on it?
  5. +8
    April 22 2026 21: 36
    It turns out that a single state considers itself entitled to determine who, what, with whom, and in what currency trades. And other countries are forced to accept this.

    Somehow it's very, very unclear.
    Let's start in order
    First, it's not just a "standalone state," but a state that has made it so that so much is tied to it. This allows for easy manipulation of all those who are hooked on these American connections. Each such connection is a thread: technologies, patent rights, markets, currency, securities, and hundreds of thousands of other threads.
    Sanctions are the strings that can be pulled
    Don't borrow from the Americans, don't buy securities, don't use their currency, don't trade with them, don't have any dealings with them - and all their sanctions will be like water off a duck's back!
    North Korea, for example. Comrade Kim just smiles at the amount of sanctions he's imposed on them.
    Yes, it’s not easy for them, very difficult, but everything is theirs, and they don’t care about the sanctions.
    Well, if you got stuck, tempted by some benefits, then don’t cry
  6. -1
    April 22 2026 21: 50
    And we will supply Europe. Finally!!! Victory!!!!!!!!!!!
    Incidentally, the EU has preliminarily approved a 90 billion euro loan and agreed to a 20-year sanctions package. Hungary and Slovakia withdrew their vetoes. Zelensky stated that the "friendship" can continue to flourish.
    1. -1
      April 23 2026 05: 07
      Did you think that funding would stop????
  7. +3
    April 22 2026 21: 59
    The United States has issued a general license for the second time, temporarily easing sanctions against Russian oil.

    There is one question - "And for how many days, or weeks???"
    The answer is simple - "As much as the US needs, but not Russia."
  8. -1
    April 22 2026 22: 07
    Selling unprocessed raw materials is a crime against Russia.
    1. -2
      April 23 2026 05: 10
      Your slogans are of no interest to anyone 😂
  9. -2
    April 22 2026 22: 17
    Yes, we've come to this point – someone outside the state decides whether we can sell our own oil or not! How sovereign. And how happy "our people" are that they've finally been allowed to sell a little. Shame!
    1. 0
      April 22 2026 23: 59
      Quote: Volunteer Marek
      Yes, we've come to this point – someone else is deciding whether we can sell our own oil or not! How very sovereign.

      Someone else decides for buyers whether they can buy Russian oil, and sanctions are imposed on those who violate this condition. So there's no need to distort the situation.
    2. -4
      April 23 2026 03: 10
      Quote: Volunteer Marek
      Yes, we've come to this point – someone outside the state decides whether we can sell our own oil or not! How sovereign. And how happy "our people" are that they've finally been allowed to sell a little. Shameful!

      Russian isn't your native language? Or don't you understand the meaning of what you're reading? Or are you so blinkered that you don't even see what's written, everything already formed in your head? No one is stopping us from selling oil, and no one can stop us! BUYERS are prohibited from buying it! Don't you understand the difference at all?
      1. -1
        April 23 2026 17: 26
        Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
        No one is stopping us from selling oil, and no one can stop us! BUYERS are prohibited from buying it! Don't you understand the difference at all???

        That's how they'll stop buying "unprohibited" oil, and then you'll understand that there's not much difference.
      2. -2
        April 24 2026 02: 40
        Don't you think it's the same thing? Who's going to buy it if buyers are prohibited from buying it? And yes, trade as much as you want.
  10. +2
    April 22 2026 22: 21
    And since 2022, what have we been trading then, despite all the sanctions and prohibitions - water, judging by the comments. laughing
  11. +1
    April 22 2026 22: 27
    Quote: Andrey K
    Are we supposed to clap our hands and throw our caps in the air?
    The US Treasury, Carl, USA, issues permission to buy and sell Russian oil!

    No need to clap... Bessent is lying a little... They are not concerned about the price tag of 150 on oil, but about buying our oil.
    But does Russia need to sell this oil to them? winked
  12. -1
    April 22 2026 22: 38
    That's right, Europe needs Russian oil, otherwise it's hard for them to finance Ukraine without us. As far as I remember, Putin has threatened to redirect gas and oil to other consumers, but apparently this is just another red-tip pen swipe.
  13. 0
    April 22 2026 23: 07
    We've come to this point where Pindostan dictates and gives permission for trade.
  14. -3
    April 23 2026 00: 50
    While it's profitable, yes, then they'll close it. The West behaves as if it were a resource appendage: when necessary, they open it, when necessary, they close it.
  15. 0
    April 23 2026 03: 32
    ❝ OFAC document authorizes delivery and sale crude oil and petroleum products of Russian origin ❞ —

    — The United States can allow or prohibit buy Russian oil to its clientele, but Whether to sell or not to sell is up to our government to decide ...
    (I think so)
  16. -1
    April 23 2026 04: 41
    OFAC's document authorizes the shipment and sale of crude oil and petroleum products of Russian origin.
    Tell me, was anyone allowed or not allowed to the Soviet Union to trade its oil?
    1. -1
      April 23 2026 23: 42
      Quote: Schneeberg
      The Soviet Union could be allowed or not allowed to trade its oil

      You won't believe it, but yes. And not just oil. The West in general, and the US in particular, have been involved in this, starting with the ban on all economic relations with Soviet Russia in 1919 and followed by many other things: the "gold blockade," the "moral blockade," the embargo and sanctions immediately after the Great Patriotic War, the Jackson-Vanik Amendment, etc.
      Another thing is that previously there were no such financial and economic instruments as there are now.
  17. -1
    April 23 2026 04: 57
    These kinds of drawings are being published everywhere now. Why? There used to be fewer of them. Apparently, the Russian elite's joy at the temporary lifting of a small piece of sanctions has become a Greater Joy. And how should the people react to this?
    1. -1
      April 23 2026 23: 44
      Quote: Yuri L
      These kinds of drawings are being published everywhere now. Why? There used to be fewer of them.

      Have the salaries of producers of such products been increased?
  18. 0
    April 23 2026 10: 31
    Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
    Quote: Stas157
    Who cares?

    The principle is that no one can forbid US anything...

    So sell it, no one is stopping you, but will there be buyers, bypassing the sanctions? hi
  19. -1
    April 23 2026 12: 23
    Can we throw our caps up now?
    1. -1
      April 23 2026 23: 45
      Quote from ShDE
      It's time to throw your caps up

      Is someone stopping you? Or is it scary without a team?
      1. -1
        April 24 2026 02: 38
        Did the gentlemen give us permission to trade? I hope you sent a letter of thanks.