The Navy has formed counter-UAV companies.

6 343 37
The Navy has formed counter-UAV companies.
Combat vehicle of the mobile fire group for countering UAVs of the ground forces


The Russian Navy has completed the formation of counter-UAV companies.





While the enemy is relying on massive attacks drones, Russian fleet responds by creating specialized companies—tailored specifically to intercept UAVs—that are already on duty.

The Russian Navy has completed the formation of specialized counter-UAV companies. The new units are now on combat alert, protecting ports, ships, and coastal infrastructure.

Specialized measures



The Russian Navy is consistently adapting to the threats of modern warfare. For several years, the fleet has been practicing counter-attack drones and unmanned naval craft, both in terms of tactics and organizational structure.

One of the key decisions was the creation of security, defense, and counter-UAV companies. Such units were to be deployed in all fleets and focused on protecting against specific threats.

April 22, 2026 "News" Citing their own sources, they reported that the formation has been completed. The companies have assumed combat duty and are guarding ports, piers, and coastal infrastructure.

The publication provided some information about the service's organization, equipment, and weapons. Most of the details are still classified; the Ministry of Defense may disclose them later.

Means and tactics




Release missiles ship-based air defense missile system "Redut"


Each company consists of two types of units: mobile fire groups и groups of observersThey solve different problems, but act in tandem.

The observers are equipped with air target detection equipment—presumably small radars and optics. In addition to their own sensors, they rely on external targeting data from other components. Defense.

Mobile fire teams have vehicles, communications and a range of weapons: electronic warfare systems, small arms weapon various calibers, portable anti-aircraft missile systems.

Camouflaged observer positions are set up in the company's area of ​​responsibility for long-term duty. Fireteams are not stationary—they patrol their assigned area and take up positions along likely drone routes, where they jam or engage drones.


Launch of the Strela-10 anti-aircraft missile


Areas of responsibility and the location of posts are determined individually, taking into account the characteristics of a specific base and the location of its facilities.

Integrated defense



Counter-UAV companies do not replace the fleet's existing air defense, but rather complement it, forming another echelon of defense with a narrow but in-demand specialization.

The coastal units of the Navy already have a wide arsenal of anti-aircraft systems:
  • Short-range air defense systems "Strela-10" and "Osa-AKM";
  • missile and gun systems "Pantsir-S" and "Tunguska";
  • anti-aircraft self-propelled guns "Shilka";
  • portable air defense systems of current models.


Shipborne air defense is no less diverse. Radars on board are capable of detecting air targets at ranges of hundreds of kilometers and simultaneously tracking a large number of objects. Depending on the ship's class, the following are armed:
  • Long-range air defense missile systems (collective defense) S-300F and Redut;
  • Short-range air defense systems "Kinzhal" and "Gibka";
  • ZRAK “Dagger” or “Broadsword”;
  • artillery systems based on 30mm rapid-fire machine guns.



Launcher of the Kinzhal complex


Together, the ship-based and coastal systems form a layered air defense system capable of covering the fleet both on the high seas and in port. Traditional systems are designed to combat aviation and cruise missiles. Specialized companies fill the niche of attack UAVs—small, cheap, and mass-produced targets against which conventional air defenses are excessively expensive.

Useful experience




A 30mm AK-630 mount fires at an aerial target.


Over the years of special operations, the Russian armed forces have accumulated extensive experience in combating drones of all types. Based on this experience, tactics have been developed and the most effective means of destruction and suppression have been selected.

The ground forces were the first to apply this experience: mobile anti-UAV fire teams were deployed both in the Northern Military District and in the rear. Now the same model has been transferred to the navy.

In terms of structure and equipment, the naval companies are similar to their army counterparts. Each is responsible for its own fleet's assets. Given the enemy's intensive use of drones, these new units will likely be put to the test soon.
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 12
    April 23 2026 05: 07
    For the navy drinks !
    Now a question, in the photo there are AK 12s mounted on a tripod. I'm embarrassed to ask - is it a ZU?
    Just explain to me why we're stockpiling twin-barreled anti-aircraft guns, quadruple-barreled Maxims, and anti-aircraft DShKs? For what war? We have them, in large numbers—I know that for sure!
    Another question: is it really that hard to make an anti-aircraft mount for existing machine guns? Soldiers at the LBS are making it on their own, crookedly, but it works. For industry, it's a task that takes minutes.
    Well, once again I send greetings to the Navy, especially the 810th Marine Regiment and the 137th Special Purpose Marine Regiment of the Black Sea Fleet.
    1. -16
      April 23 2026 05: 26
      To your stupid statement.
      -Is it really so difficult to create a "machine"!?
      - It's a matter of minutes!
      Answer.
      Is it really that hard to shoot down all the drones and UAVs with what we have!?
      Is it a shame?
      1. +7
        April 23 2026 05: 41
        Quote: sagitovich

        Is it really that hard to shoot down all the drones and UAVs with what we have!?
        Is it a shame?

        It's a sin to be offended by holy fools. Yes Did you want what, or did you just miss some pills?
      2. +1
        April 23 2026 06: 05
        Quote: sagitovich
        To your stupid statement.
        -Is it really so difficult to create a "machine"!?
        - It's a matter of minutes!
        Answer.
        Is it really that hard to shoot down all the drones and UAVs with what we have!?
        Is it a shame?

        What can be done against UAVs flying at low altitudes at night? What detection capabilities are available for these low-observability targets? Their low radar cross-section and low thermal emission prevent effective use of existing air defense systems, and their widespread use overloads "smart" air defense systems. Without new optical and acoustic detection and targeting systems, and the corresponding equipping of these "companies," the use of various machine guns with targeted fire is impossible to combat UAVs. I don't know the current state of the supply of ME (multi-element projectiles) to automatic small-caliber anti-aircraft artillery, or canister rounds capable of creating a continuous kill zone on naval anti-aircraft gun mounts.
        1. -4
          April 23 2026 09: 13
          I'll tell you something smart, just don't be offended!
          Searchlights and night sights are used against UAVs at low altitudes at night.
          1. -4
            April 23 2026 09: 19
            Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
            Searchlights and night sights are used against UAVs at low altitudes at night.

            Have you seen spotlights lately? In what movie?
            1. -1
              April 23 2026 09: 40
              Look, you military genius. Where are you guys coming from?
              MTF Armed Forces of Ukraine.
              1. -5
                April 23 2026 09: 42
                Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
                Look, you military genius. Where are you guys coming from?
                MTF Armed Forces of Ukraine.

                Did you draw the beam yourself? Why does it end abruptly, or is your genius level limited by the AI?
                1. -1
                  April 23 2026 09: 45
                  Military genius, make your own search, Yandex will select a bunch of images for you, choose the one you like, if this one doesn't suit you.
                  In addition to the pictures, there are plenty of videos showing the Ukrainian Armed Forces repelling night raids using searchlights.
                  Where do you come from? Oh, and I forgot, you're a supporter of the Israeli military. That explains your aggressiveness on the simplest and most understandable issues.
            2. +3
              April 23 2026 10: 13
              Quote: Konnick
              Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
              Searchlights and night sights are used against UAVs at low altitudes at night.

              Have you seen spotlights lately? In what movie?

              Almost every night I see a searchlight beam in the sky above my city. hi
              1. -3
                April 23 2026 10: 25
                Quote: 30 vis
                Almost every night I see a spotlight beam in the sky above my city.

                One beam?
                1. +4
                  April 23 2026 12: 25
                  Quote: Konnick
                  Quote: 30 vis
                  Almost every night I see a spotlight beam in the sky above my city.

                  One beam?

                  Don't find fault with my words. drinks It's clear that searchlight teams are working over the entire city of Hero. From my house (with limited visibility), I can see several searchlight beams sweeping the night sky. And considering that Hero City repels attacks by Ukrainian drones every night, the systematic work of the searchlight teams is evident. Or would you like the coordinates? bully specify?
                  1. -2
                    April 23 2026 12: 36
                    Quote: 30 vis
                    Or do you also need to provide the coordinates?

                    The VSU soldiers will recognize it without me, especially if the searchlights are stationary. And they should be low over the sea from the Konstantinovsky Ravelin, not pointing skyward, as we indicate here.
            3. +1
              April 23 2026 15: 08
              The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) equips border service posts and coast guard units with air defense searchlights to monitor the perimeters of critical facilities and waters. Modern LED border searchlights with Fresnel lenses can effectively illuminate objects at distances of up to 10–20 km, and up to 30 km under ideal conditions. The key factor is not just range, but the contrast and clarity of the beam, ensuring reliable detection.
              It's true that there is something on the other side too.
              Below is a photo of Ukrainian spotlights.
        2. -3
          April 23 2026 15: 22
          Well, judging by the fact that most of the drones are shot down, this means that the air defense is quite effective.
  2. +2
    April 23 2026 05: 12
    The article reads like a formal report for show. But in fact, the weapons listed were in place and used, but they were of little help. What the companies will be armed with is unknown...
    1. -2
      April 23 2026 15: 24
      How do you come up with the idea that it's not very effective if most of the drones get shot down?
  3. 0
    April 23 2026 05: 42
    This may be classified, I apologize, but how do our ships protect our ports with everything listed in the article? In my opinion, even a single ship is capable of protecting a port or an oil terminal.
    Nowadays, all ships, both military and civilian, have radars that can detect all threats of attack. The detection range of, for example, a drone can be increased by using a ship-based UAV equipped with a MANPADS and a television camera, powered via a wire. What happened in Tuapse and St. Petersburg, for example, can only be called a failure of judgment on the part of both local authorities and the owners of the oil depots, and the war has been going on for five years! The mayor or governor could have inspected the hazardous facilities and forced them to protect the facilities or shut them down and dump the oil products. It's not the owners of the oil depots who own the cities and ports, but the city authorities, who are responsible for the lives and the environment of the population.
    1. +1
      April 23 2026 09: 19
      What exactly can the owner of an oil depot or refinery in Tuapse do? They can't do anything. Air defense in coastal cities is the sole responsibility of the Ministry of Defense and local authorities, who are able to allocate land for air defense operations.
      If I had my way, I would have long ago built air defense towers along the shore and even along the breakwaters, equipped with guns, launchers, searchlights, and radars. Like they used to build lighthouses. Only one or two lighthouses are needed, while five to ten air defense towers are needed along the shore.
      1. +1
        April 23 2026 09: 58
        So, you see, you have reasonable solutions for protecting the city and port. And not at exorbitant prices. They built it, the military deployed air defense weapons. And the owners of an oil depot or refinery could at least cover all the equipment with three layers of chain-link fencing. They have enough money for yachts and Mercedes, so they can afford chain-link fencing. Or they close down their production facilities if they don't want to protect their property.
        1. +1
          April 23 2026 13: 19
          They said someone had covered it with netting, and the fire department arrived and demanded it be removed, saying it would interfere with the firefighters. And there were no violations, no such documents.
          1. 0
            April 23 2026 15: 27
            I don't know who told you what, but many oil refineries (as seen in the photo) have nets installed.
      2. 0
        April 23 2026 15: 27
        The main thing is to pass a law, or a bylaw. Federal Law No. 398-FZ of July 31, 2023, entered into force on July 1, 2024. It toughens penalties for violating anti-terrorism protection requirements for facilities. Therefore, business owners who fail to ensure protection against UAVs risk facing significant fines, including criminal prosecution and imprisonment for up to seven years.
        Since 08.05.2025, the RF Government Resolution of 30.04.2025 No. 588 "Specifics of protection against acts of illegal interference with the use of unmanned aerial vehicles of transport facilities and (or) groups of transport infrastructure facilities around which security zones are established" has been in effect, which imposes the following obligations on transport infrastructure entities:
        The protection of transport infrastructure facilities and groups of transport infrastructure facilities is carried out by a transport security unit (units), which includes a post (posts) for monitoring the air, land and water situation and countering unmanned aerial vehicles.
        10. The equipping of transport infrastructure facilities, groups of transport infrastructure facilities with the means, structures and devices specified in the third paragraph of clause 7 of this document, and special technical means for countering unmanned aerial vehicles shall be carried out by transport infrastructure entities in accordance with plans for ensuring transport security of transport infrastructure facilities within 6 months from the date of approval of the plan for ensuring transport security of transport infrastructure facilities.
        Special technical means for countering unmanned aerial vehicles may be provided to employees of the transport security unit by transport infrastructure entities for temporary use.
        11. The list of special technical means for countering unmanned aerial vehicles used at a transport infrastructure facility is determined taking into account the provisions of Part 7 of Article 12.3 of the Federal Law "On Transport Security", as well as the provisions of Article 9 of the Federal Law "On Departmental Security" in the event that the suppression of the operation of unmanned aerial vehicles is carried out by employees of the departmental security of federal executive bodies in the field of transport.
        12. The suppression of the operation of unmanned aerial vehicles for the purpose of protecting transport infrastructure facilities is carried out by employees of transport security units in accordance with the decision on such suppression, the procedure for which is provided for in Part 8.2 of Article 12.3 of the Federal Law "On Transport Security".
        13. To protect transport infrastructure facilities and groups of transport infrastructure facilities, the use of special technical means to counter unmanned aerial vehicles is permitted within the boundaries of the air, land, and water (including underwater) parts of security zones and transport security zones of transport infrastructure facilities.

        The Port of Tuapse, like any other seaport, is a conglomerate of transport infrastructure facilities. So why should the mayor, much less the governor, bother if everything is delegated to transport infrastructure entities? It's much easier for city and regional authorities to hold meetings after every emergency involving the owners of transport infrastructure facilities and lambast them for failing to comply with the requirements of Federal Law No. 398 of July 31, 2023, and Government Decree No. 588 of April 30, 2025.
        Again, it is much easier for various prosecutors' offices to hold owners (or operators) of transport infrastructure facilities accountable than for city and regional authorities.
        1. +1
          April 23 2026 15: 41
          What a great idea! An enemy drone flew at you? We'll fine you now!
          Residents of buildings should also be fined if a drone lands. And also the victims of burglars, robbers, rapists, and others. fool
          1. 0
            April 24 2026 11: 19
            When the Moscow explosions occurred in 1999, as the manager of a relatively innocuous city facility, I signed for five or six notices stating that in the event of an explosion at the facility assigned to me, criminal charges would be filed against me. I even received one from the district housing and utilities department, although I'd already received one from the prefecture and the local council. The guys at the office weren't fooling around with this, though, and only laughed at the city and federal authorities' attempt to cover their own asses when I showed them all these papers. Tens of thousands of such notices were probably distributed throughout Moscow in 1999, with signatures required.
  4. +3
    April 23 2026 05: 49
    I don't understand why the naval command is even now bothering to develop mobile task forces (MTFs)? Did UAV attacks on ships and bases really start this year? And their effectiveness when UAVs approach from the sea isn't particularly high. After all, the maximum range of an AK-47 against a UAV is 500 meters!!! And as Alexey noted, this is all COMPLETELY amateurish. I hope the naval MTFs at least have machine guns and not AK-47s.
  5. +2
    April 23 2026 06: 13
    For the Navy! I'm absolutely horrified that in this age of digitalization and robotics, our operators are in vehicles and working manually. Even though fully automated firing positions of this configuration should already exist, and the military only has to move them in/camouflage them/move away, while control is in the hands of the operator at a command post at least a kilometer away. Small radars even operate automatically!!! hi Hello 61st battalion of infantry fighting vehicles!!!
    1. 0
      April 23 2026 09: 28
      The Samum ZU-23/30M anti-aircraft gun has been on display at exhibitions since 2017. Apparently, no one needs it.
    2. -3
      April 23 2026 15: 27
      Where are those armies where everything is automated? Have you seen them in movies?
  6. -2
    April 23 2026 08: 20
    Yes, the forum participants have a strange predilection; anything about waste attracts them like flies to... and there are 969 views of this important topic and 2183 views of clogged toilets as of 8:20 a.m. Moscow time.
  7. 0
    April 23 2026 12: 58
    Interesting news - if only there was some sense in it! soldier
  8. +1
    April 23 2026 13: 47
    A 30mm AK-630 mount would be a great addition to a tank chassis, or a Kamaz or Ural truck. There's room for ammo, and cooling with antifreeze and radiators is possible. And the armor wouldn't hurt either. Incidentally, such a marvel wouldn't hurt on an armored train either. I'd love to fire it at a tank in full armor—a 1-3 second salvo. I'd be interested in that... especially the aftermath. Preferably, the tank would be crewed by Nazis... until we see the results.
    1. -1
      April 23 2026 18: 49
      Shirokorad, at the very beginning of the SVO, proposed organizing a barrier in Crimea in a strip across the entire peninsula.
      It would have been entirely possible to begin building a direct railway line from Kerch to Simferopol. And to use it at that moment only for military purposes, including for air defense armored trains. But alas, no one listened.
      Only use the lighter AK-306 as a mobile installation.
  9. +1
    April 23 2026 18: 07
    Apparently, in the command of the Navy and not only there, there are descendants of Estonians.
  10. 0
    April 23 2026 21: 36
    It's a shame that the soldiers themselves have to make do with it. "On the ground," it's the same old story: a drowning man must save himself...
  11. -1
    April 23 2026 23: 18
    In the fifth year of non-war, "the Russian Navy has completed the formation of counter-UAV companies." (When the Ukrainians had counter-UAV units years ago, the media laughed at them... not for free, I hope?)

    This reminds me of a joke...
  12. 0
    April 24 2026 19: 18
    In the fourth year of the war, the naval commanders were honored😂😂😂