Military Review

Analytical program "However" with Mikhail Leontiev 16 May 2013

33



In the scandal with the detention in Moscow of an American spy diplomat what is most important? A diplomat, he is a spy — there is a scandal — no.
As Yury Ushakov, a presidential aide for foreign policy, stated, "a case of crude, awkward recruitment took place against the backdrop of a clearly stated mood of both President Obama and President Putin about the importance of enhancing cooperation and contacts between the special services of the two countries." And he complained that these impulses from the top to the executive level, for example, to some employees of the American embassy, ​​somehow were not communicated. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov considered this topic superfluous at the talks with his American counterpart John Kerry: "Everything is already public knowledge. And, in my opinion, everyone understands everything."

The point is that really everything is clear. Including "some employees of the American Embassy." That is, there is understanding, and the motivation is different. Given our attitude to the professionalism of such a respected organization as the CIA, this is the only explanation of almost public recruitment, more like a clowning, when not the last employee of this organization, specially dressed as a spy, rushes to recruit our staff member who did not give him any worthy reasons .

From the film "TASS is authorized to declare":
- Well, go - adviser on culture! Hold the bundle!
- That's not mine. I am an American diplomat. You have no right.

Paraphrasing Professor Preobrazhensky, do not look before eating Soviet films. The advice is, in principle, superfluous. For example, the same Ambassador McFaul is not a boy. But the fact of the matter is that this is not a boy of another era and another team. We have repeatedly spoken about how the current Obama team is trying to expand Russian-American relations, for example, on such painful topics as Syria. And what are the over-interest and what kind of opposition does it run into at the same time? The only explanation for stupid recruitment is an attempt to spoil the atmosphere of these finely tuned relationships. But Elena Malysheva noted in the program “To live healthy”: “Farting is a conscious process. He can fart into the toilet, and not next to you in bed!”

From the film "TASS is authorized to state:

"My government has appropriately assessed your government’s decision not to publicize this matter."

And you say - scandal !?
Originator:
http://www.1tv.ru
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dmitry 2246
    Dmitry 2246 17 May 2013 09: 17 New
    10
    It is not clear whose interests in America will prevail. Why should we wait?
    No one believes Uncle Sam’s kindness.
    1. krasin
      krasin 17 May 2013 09: 27 New
      +6
      Politics, politics, and intelligence works. It has always been like that.
      1. Romn
        Romn 17 May 2013 09: 29 New
        25
        Our relations with America have lately begun to remind me of a dialogue or a conflict of two people, Only one keeps himself proud, patient and restrained (of course, this is Russia), making small, sharp and sharp attacks towards the opponent, which by the way severely injure him, especially him pride. And America, which has already passed on to personal insults of the most stupid character (whether it’s Magnitsky’s lists or accusations of Russia's support for the bloody regimes), since it doesn’t already know how it can be hooked, wounded or hurt and madly mad at it. We need to continue to maintain self-confidence, not succumbing to law enforcement, continuing to further build up strength and not give up positions!
        1. Shoma-1970
          Shoma-1970 17 May 2013 10: 01 New
          0
          You're absolutely right!!!
        2. Scoun
          Scoun 17 May 2013 13: 35 New
          +2
          Quote: Romn
          Our relationship with America recently

          As far back as last year, Obama "said" that if he is re-elected then ... he could be more "accommodating" with Russia on a number of issues.
          Then, with what creak, the ministers of defense were removed with a crack and with what creak the new US Secretary of Defense was put.
          If the president’s administration openly changes relations with Russia for positive, they can get rid of congressmen .... since there are a lot of Russophobes among congressmen, both among republicans and democrats.
          IMHA, the US administration, our Foreign Ministry are trying to "squeeze" the maximum out of the "Boston terrorist attack and delay the spy .. and maybe we will see how our special services will change in the" wave "of cooperation .. the tone of America’s White House will change to positive .. Americans have enough of their problems, plus their interest has shifted to Southeast Asia, and there they can tear the navel.
      2. Bykov.
        Bykov. 17 May 2013 09: 44 New
        0
        Quote: krasin
        ... Politics, politics, and intelligence works. It has always been like that ...

        "Tell me who your enemy is, and I will tell you who you are," damn it, and who we are after such a clown, damn it ...
        1. Shoma-1970
          Shoma-1970 17 May 2013 10: 03 New
          +2
          Bykov, do you think that our enemy ends on this moron? And how can this moron be considered an enemy? if only he was an enemy he would not be sent home, but for Bout and others he would be closed on new land hi
          1. Bykov.
            Bykov. 18 May 2013 03: 48 New
            0
            Quote: Shoma-1970
            ... Bulls, do you think that our enemy ends with this moron? And how can this moron be considered an enemy? if only he were an enemy he would not be sent home, but for Bout and others he would be closed on new land ...

            Our counterintelligence catches something, moron after moron, then the Brit-stone spy kicks live on TV, and now it’s also ... a miracle in a wig, in general, some kind of degradation ...
      3. domokl
        domokl 17 May 2013 11: 05 New
        +3
        Quote: krasin
        Politics, politics, and intelligence works. It has always been like that.

        This is a fact. But the concrete recruitment of clowning in the full sense of the word. I agree with Leontyev, the CIA, through a scandal, is trying to solve its own, intra-American troubles, to confront Abama with the fact.
      4. Sirocco
        Sirocco 17 May 2013 11: 06 New
        +1
        Politics, politics, and intelligence works. It has always been like that.
        That's just the point that was so. And it became like in a circus, it feels like the circus left, but the clown remained. All this recruitment, of our officer, is sewn with white thread, and is primarily intended for the western man in the street, I think that many have read articles about this recruitment in Western publications. Pig screeching about Russia and the KGB from the Cold War.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Canep
      Canep 17 May 2013 09: 34 New
      +2
      As far as I know history in America, the interests of profit always prevail. In the case of Syria, if the Americans consider that the overthrow of Assad will cost them too much, they will leave him alone.
    4. Bykov.
      Bykov. 17 May 2013 09: 41 New
      +1
      Quote: Dmitry 2246
      ... It is not clear whose interests in America will prevail. Why should we wait? ...

      Don’t expect anything good from them - “Horseradish, radishes are sweeter” - otherwise we’ll wait, from them, again, some kind of taunt.
    5. Shoma-1970
      Shoma-1970 17 May 2013 09: 59 New
      +1
      Why do we need their kindness !? May they seek kindness in us! It is necessary to achieve this, it will be the other way around. hi
      1. TekhnarMAF
        TekhnarMAF 17 May 2013 15: 42 New
        +1
        Maybe I'm wrong, but all this (Boston, Ishpien) resembles a performance of a lousy director! There is no doubt about the professionalism of the FSB (KGB), but the CIA is not children, there are many examples. Parity exchange?
        1. S_mirnov
          S_mirnov 17 May 2013 16: 42 New
          -2
          I read your comments comrades and longing takes me. Well, what for the independent policy of the Russian Federation?
          The USSR lost the Cold War - does everyone seem to understand this?
          The losers are under occupation and pay indemnities - I hope everyone knows this too!
          The transfer of power and the country's exit from under occupation is a large-scale event with popular demonstrations, the overthrow of the occupation government, military skirmishes! So let's think about it, and what did we have that? Type of the fall of the Berlin Wall event should be !!! And here we have Uncle Borka brought Uncle Vova by the hand and presented him as heir - that's it !!!
          It was true GKChP - but the attempt clearly failed, and then one continuous stabilizer!
          If anyone does not believe, answer the simple question - by what specific formula is the dollar and euro exchange rates calculated in our country - THERE IS NO such a formula as they indicate to us - that is. And if our country cannot independently print money without the United States, then what kind of independent policy can be discussed? Because there are spies - but there is no scandal !!!
          1. Strezhevchanin
            Strezhevchanin 17 May 2013 18: 07 New
            0
            Quote: S_mirnov
            There is NO such a formula, which they will show us the course - this is it.

            And all the rest means immediately rush from the morning to the calculator ...... Nuka, how much does the Senna Doller cost there? Well, like everyone else ???
            1. S_mirnov
              S_mirnov 17 May 2013 22: 26 New
              0
              I do not understand anything, can you express yourself more clearly?
        2. Bear52
          Bear52 18 May 2013 00: 36 New
          0
          TekhnarMAF
          Parity exchange?
          Maybe. Or "red herring" from, God forbid, something serious soldier
    6. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 18 May 2013 14: 39 New
      0
      Quote: Dmitry 2246
      It is not clear whose interests in America will prevail. Why should we wait?
      No one believes Uncle Sam’s kindness.


      Elementary. The interests of those with more money will prevail.
  2. My address
    My address 17 May 2013 09: 29 New
    +7
    More publicly and often "wash" them! More publicly and more often!
    To teach to stand in a corner, and even pretend to be teachers in all disciplines. God will be on our side, he does not like a petition.
  3. Suhov
    Suhov 17 May 2013 09: 33 New
    +4
    The only explanation for stupid recruitment is attempt to spoil the atmosphere these finely tuned relationships.
    And here, as Elena Malysheva noted in the program “Live Healthy”: “Farting is a conscious process. It can fart in the toilet, and not next to you in bed!”

    Ryan Christopher Fogle - "Gone with the Bunch"
    laughing
  4. taseka
    taseka 17 May 2013 09: 39 New
    +8
    "To paraphrase Professor Preobrazhensky, do not watch Soviet films before eating." - look and become human!
  5. rauffg
    rauffg 17 May 2013 09: 50 New
    +1
    the importance of enhancing cooperation and contacts between the special services of the two countries. "
    So maybe you tried to activate it all. laughing
  6. Atlon
    Atlon 17 May 2013 09: 54 New
    +8
    In general, a provocation, as clear as God's day. Who spoke about the omnipotence of the presidents? Here is a good example of OPEN sabotage of decisions of the head of state. It is clear that Fogl intentionally framed.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 17 May 2013 10: 04 New
      +8
      Quote: Atlon
      . It is clear that Fogl intentionally framed.

      Why is it clear that you participated in operational development or you think that the FSB told everything?
      They gave general information to the press and no more, all the rest of the work is always left behind the scenes hi
      1. Apollo
        Apollo 17 May 2013 10: 13 New
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Why is it clear that you participated in operational development or you think that the FSB told everything?


        Actually, this American spy was expressed in an operative language for a long time, he was under external surveillance for a long time. Moreover, I’m more than sure that even before arriving in Moscow about the American diplomat, the spy knew almost everything. This indicates the high professional level of Russian residents and scouts abroad good
        1. matross
          matross 17 May 2013 16: 00 New
          -1
          Quote: Apollon
          Actually, this American spy was expressed in an operative language for a long time, he was under external surveillance for a long time. Moreover, I’m more than sure that even before arriving in Moscow about the American diplomat, the spy knew almost everything. This indicates the high professional level of Russian residents and scouts abroad

          Already wept! Pravda newspaper editorial for 197 ... year!
          Do you have first-hand information? Right "From There"? bully
    2. Alekseir162
      Alekseir162 17 May 2013 10: 17 New
      +2
      The provocation is certainly in the face, but why such clumsy work, well, just like in a cheap action movie.
    3. BDRM 667
      BDRM 667 17 May 2013 10: 21 New
      +5
      Quote: Atlon
      In general, a provocation, as clear as God's day. Who spoke about the omnipotence of the presidents? Here is a good example of OPEN sabotage of decisions of the head of state. It is clear that Fogl intentionally framed.
  7. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 17 May 2013 10: 01 New
    +4
    I don’t understand why such a hype as they used to catch, they are catching now and will be catching later. It really seems like a setup, and it’s not necessary if the US president himself wants to improve its wearing with Russia, the American elite also wants to, and she never He doesn’t want to. The president in America has a nominal figure in essence and all the affairs are run by the financial elite from Wall Street, even if they threw a dice to the American cattle and let them “elect” the Negro president. Surely after the election, serious uncles came to his office and explained if he himself did not understand before, "you say put your signatures here, go on TV generally relax, but you will do what we tell you, and we won’t find another, more accommodating." The fate of some American presidents risked only a little encroaching on the power of the American financial elite is indicative. So Obama can talk about eternal friendship, etc., but apparently through this disguised clown they hinted who is really in America as well as the master in the world.
  8. individual
    individual 17 May 2013 10: 08 New
    +3
    M. Leontyev is certainly a normal patriotically educated journalist.
    To the extent not loving America and its derivative-dollar.
    In political broadcasting, it occupies a niche of official voice, and sometimes it has a special opinion that attracts its listeners and admirers. His “dissenting opinion” was even put on the cover of the HERE.
    On the incident with the espionage story of the third secretary of the embassy, ​​her clowning, he correctly emphasized. However, time will pass and the secret will become apparent. US intelligence agencies do not just stage productions, which means there is intrigue, and intrigue is always waiting for a sensation.
  9. BARKAS
    BARKAS 17 May 2013 10: 20 New
    +3
    And who the CIA actually recruited before, as a rule, the traitors themselves were looking for meetings with them, apparently now they pressed them hard and went on a gamble with recruitment, traitors to the motherland either sit or fled to America.
    1. Sochi
      Sochi 17 May 2013 11: 39 New
      +3
      All traitors, or almost all of them, have long settled in all kinds of non-profit organizations, and they sell their homeland in retail and wholesale ...
  10. afire
    afire 17 May 2013 10: 33 New
    +2
    nevertheless, all the absurdity of what happened with this agent suggests that this was done on purpose, and only on purpose, and based on this there are a couple of reasons:
    1) the CIA officer did everything to return to his homeland.
    2) he, like a bargaining chip, stupid young and not experienced, was thrown into the center of undermining relations with Russia, thereby getting rid of a mediocre employee (consider the savings) and a significant dissatisfaction with the actions of Russia from America was shown. 2 hares in the furnace)
    1. 17085
      17085 17 May 2013 11: 40 New
      +1
      Let me disagree. Is it not profitable for Russia to aggravate the current situation? Could receive money and spend on charity or retirement, and in response to push an outright misinformation. First of all, it’s profitable for us to poke the bosses of Bondik into the puddle he has made. Maybe the situation is more trivial. The embassy, ​​like any government organization, has a planned budget. This budget provides for certain items of expenditure. One of them is the cost of recruiting informants. To avoid budget cuts, expenditures should be carried out according to plan. Since the reduction of this particular article shines in the next budget (in view of the agreements at the highest level, the exchange of information between special services), the administration decided to speed up the implementation of the funds, and as a result, the preservation of this article in the future. For Lavrov, the current situation is a bargaining chip in negotiations (additional guarantees can be required to avoid unfriendly actions in the future), for the embassy - a closed or cut-down expense item, for us it is very pleasant.
      1. afire
        afire 17 May 2013 11: 55 New
        -1
        Do you really think that the embassy of America has a planned distribution policy?
        are you really sure that their planned money will be enough to bribe?
        It’s strange to hear about which Americans are selfless ....
        Be sure that even if the money does not go anywhere, they will find worthy use, one of the senior officials of the embassy will stupidly take away to the extremes ...
        something like
  11. Ivanovich47
    Ivanovich47 17 May 2013 11: 21 New
    +1
    Judging by how absurd the recruitment of the Russian representative of the special services went, it was a setup. Maybe the Americans hoped that our Foreign Ministry would make a fuss, worsening the already lousy relations between Russia and the United States. But Lavrov was unperturbed: why worry, this is an everyday matter ... (Carson). I think Uncle Sam got a zilch.
  12. Sochi
    Sochi 17 May 2013 11: 42 New
    +1
    It all looks strange ... Either the CIA holds us for fools (after watching the figures from all kinds of NGOs), or the CIA left them idiots.
  13. Opera
    Opera 17 May 2013 11: 50 New
    +4
    Quote: Dmitry 2246
    It is not clear whose interests in America will prevail. Why should we wait?

    And you don’t have to wait at all! You need to act in accordance with your interests in all areas!
    Quote: afire
    ) the CIA employee did everything to return to his homeland. 2) he, like a bargaining chip, stupid young and not experienced, was thrown into the center of undermining relations with Russia, thereby getting rid of the mediocre employee (consider the savings) and significant dissatisfaction with the actions of Russia from America shown. 2 hares in the furnace)

    But this is really funny !!! Apparently in Libya, the United States thus got rid of the mediocre ambassador and 3 more employees! But TsRUshnikov, well, it’s not at all a pity for the young and silly and not so!
    The key word here is INADNESS and you don’t have to invent a bicycle, including Mr. Leontyev!
    Quote: Ivanovich47
    Judging by how absurd the recruitment of the Russian representative of the special services went, it was a setup. Maybe the Americans hoped that our Foreign Ministry would make a fuss, worsening the already lousy relations between Russia and the United States. But Lavrov was unperturbed: why worry, this is an everyday matter ... (Carson). I think Uncle Sam got a zilch.




    But this is even funnier! So the Americans wanted to spoil pancake relations with Russia and we did not give them! And now we have an IMPORTED relationship! drinks
    Americans will never cooperate with Russia sincerely! Not with anything! It's just that not only we have fools and roads ... They have fools with compasses here! The matter is everyday!
  14. fenix57
    fenix57 17 May 2013 12: 07 New
    +2
    Quote: Apollon
    Moreover, I’m more than sure that even before arriving in Moscow about the American diplomat a spy, almost everything was known.

    I won’t discover America if I say that anyan employee of any embassy is "under the magnifying glass" of our specialists .. And he "makes his way" long before arrival. Russian Foreign Intelligence is not in vain "eats bread."
  15. kmike
    kmike 17 May 2013 12: 12 New
    +2
    Yes, the Jaysa Bond in the CIA is over if they take such clowns to the service, and this is to work on the territory of the main enemy.
  16. MG42
    MG42 17 May 2013 12: 21 New
    +3
    Of course the murky story with this agent looks too clumsy from the side, lol Most likely, this seemingly Amersky “teapot” was actually a double agent, and the task was to play this scenario with a wig, a compass and recruitment just when Carrie's visits to Moscow began to provide a dip. pressure and deliveries of S-300 systems to Syria did not take place, but Moscow outplayed it, Lavrov said that deliveries were being carried out under previously signed contracts, and to reinforce his position with this disclosure of the “double agent” ...
  17. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 17 May 2013 13: 23 New
    +4
    Russia has always carefully thought through such steps. Usually we adjusted to the Western interlocutor, were afraid to disrupt the upcoming visit or negotiations, and so on. The current demonstratively rude case speaks of a turn of our policy, we kind of propose partnering with the partner, he himself needs to negotiate with Russia or not. And they say to us no difference.
  18. Yura
    Yura 17 May 2013 17: 48 New
    0
    Quote: Jurkovs
    The current demonstratively rude case speaks of a turn of our policy, we kind of propose partnering with the partner, he himself needs to negotiate with Russia or not. And they say to us no difference.

    Very similar to that.
  19. Edward
    Edward 17 May 2013 19: 36 New
    +1
    Guru-Leontiev has long been bored. Good man. All his life he says "however."
    And under the Yeltsin and the following. Always honest and polysemous.
    But definitely our man. :)
  20. DuraLexSedLex.
    DuraLexSedLex. 17 May 2013 22: 05 New
    0
    And in my opinion, the CIA just leaked the sucker out of their ranks, playfully in the American style)))))