The Rise and Fall of the Russian Imperial Navy. From Peter the Great to the Reign of Anna Ioannovna

29 399 40
The Rise and Fall of the Russian Imperial Navy. From Peter the Great to the Reign of Anna Ioannovna
Yu. Kushevsky. "A New Case in Russia"


Regular Russian naval military fleet, as is well known, was created under Peter the Great. Since then, many resounding victories have been achieved, and Russian warships have appeared not only in the Black and Baltic Seas, but also in the North and Pacific Oceans. There is also a Caspian battle flotilla. However, there have also been several tragedies, after which Russia has lost a huge number of painstakingly built ships. The first of these occurred during Peter the Great's lifetime: after the disastrous and poorly prepared Prut campaign of 1711, the Tsar was forced to destroy the ships of the long-suffering Azov Fleet (which had been built several times, but the ships fell into disrepair whenever the Tsar was distracted by other matters). All recently captured fortresses were also forced to be returned to Turkey—including Azov, Kamenny Zaton, and the proposed future capital, Taganrog. And in 1727, the shipyard in Voronezh burned down, along with all the ships either ready or under construction there.



But the problem was also that immediately after the end of each war, Russian monarchs usually lost interest in naval affairs, and when a new war began, the fleet was found to be in complete decline, the ships unprepared for sea, and the crews poorly trained. And many emperors and empresses could echo Catherine II:

We have an abundance of ships and people, but there is no fleet or sailors.

Unfortunately, there were also cases of flagrant theft. After the defeat in the Crimean War, in 1857, the St. Petersburg newspaper "Golos" published a speech by Alexander Manuilov, delivered at a meeting of the Free Economic Society. It included the following words:

For a thousand years history Nowhere was there such a predatory and useless waste of public funds as in the construction of warships on the Black Sea... A fifty-year epic of theft, baseness and bribery remained as a shameful stamp on the conscience of those who made bottoms from rotten wood and sewed sails from worthless canvas.

In 1858, Rear Admiral Grigory Butakov, the military governor of Sevastopol and Nikolaev, wrote to the Grand Duke and General Admiral Konstantin Nikolaevich:

Almost all of Nikolaev, with its enormous houses, most of which quietly display only three, and often five, windows to the street, was built from them (stolen state funds). Many surrounding villages grew from the same source.

The result was unexpected: Konstantin, whom many contemporaries suspected of close ties to Black Sea thieves and embezzlers, issued Butakov a severe reprimand, and six months later the overly principled governor was transferred to the Baltic.

But let's not get ahead.

Peter I's Naval Victories


Peter I nevertheless succeeded in creating the Baltic Fleet. And it wasn't just the monarch's great love of seagoing ships. After the resounding victory at Poltava and the capitulation of the remnants of Charles XII's army at Perevolochna, the only circumstance allowing Sweden to delay signing the inevitable peace with a formal acknowledgment of territorial losses was Russia's lack of sufficient warships capable of engaging the Swedish fleet and threatening the country's coast. However, 17 ships of the line were purchased in England and Holland, 20 were built in St. Petersburg, 7 in Arkhangelsk, two each in Novaya Ladoga and at the Olonetsk shipyard. Seven frigates were purchased from Holland, and two more from England. In addition, the new Baltic Fleet included 16 shnyavs (two-masted vessels with 14-18 cannons) and over 200 galleys.

Incidentally, it should be noted that buying ships abroad was usually significantly cheaper than building them in one's own shipyards - despite the fact that they were built abroad not from raw, but from dried wood and served approximately twice as long.

Friedrich Wilhelm Bergholz, the son of Peter the Great's general, who left Russia in 1727, cites in his diary the reasons for the short service life of ships built in Russian shipyards:

The timber here is not good, at least it is cut at the wrong time and does not rise as it should, and partly because the Kronslot and Revel harbors are washed by not very good sea water.

The British envoy C. Whitworth wrote about the same thing in 1710:

Because of the forest - partly green, partly overgrown, mostly cut down in the spring, after the sap has risen, which makes the wood loose - because of the humidity of the air and the dampness of the earth, all the ships rot as soon as they are built.

Let us note, by the way, that ships were often built not from sawn, but from hewn boards - and therefore from a huge log one board was obtained.

However, Peter the Great's fleet achieved several major victories in the Baltic Sea. A separate article could be written about each of them, but many such articles have already been written, and the battles have been described almost minute by minute, so it's hardly worth repeating here. We'll simply note that the main role in most naval battles of the Northern War was played not by large sailing ships, but by rowboats. This is clearly visible in contemporary engravings. Here, for example, is what the Battle of Gangut (1714) looks like in an engraving by Mauritius Baku:


Here, the Russians were confronted by a Swedish squadron consisting of 15 ships of the line, three frigates, two bombardiers (two-masted sailing vessels with 12-14 large-caliber cannons or two-four mortars, used for bombarding fortresses and ports), and nine galleys. They were not confronted by large naval vessels, but by 99 Russian galleys, scampavii (lightweight galleys with two masts for lateen sails and armed with one or two small-caliber cannons, capable of carrying up to 150 soldiers), and auxiliary vessels. This battle became the largest naval engagement between Sweden and Russia in the Great Northern War; in honor of this victory, the name "Gangut" was given to five large warships. However, as already noted, it was the rowing vessels that attacked the large Swedish ships that had "lost the wind."

And this is an engraving by A. Zubov, “The Battle of Grengam” (1720), painted a year after this battle:


The Swedish squadron included a ship of the line, four frigates, three galleys, three skerryboats (sailing and rowing vessels with one mast and 6-8 pairs of oars, carrying 4-6 light cannons), a shnyava, a galiot (a small two-masted vessel for messenger and transport service), and a brigantine. On the Russian side, M. M. Golitsyn's skerry squadron entered the battle—61 galleys and 29 boats. Despite the strong artillery Despite enemy fire, which severely damaged 42 Russian galleys (many of which were later burned), they managed to capture four frigates and nearly boarded a ship of the line. The nearby English squadron, allied with the Swedes, did not dare engage in battle.

Interestingly, the battles of Gangut and Grengam took place on the feast day of the healer and holy great martyr Panteleimon. In 1735, a church was founded in St. Petersburg in honor of these victories, consecrated on July 27, 1739.


Panteleimon Church (Church of the Holy Great Martyr and Healer Panteleimon) in a photograph from the early 1900s in St. Petersburg

The Battle of Ösel Island (Saaremaa, 1719) became a true naval battle, in which N. Senyavin's squadron, consisting of six ships of the line and one shnyava (a light, two-masted warship for reconnaissance and dispatch service, armed with 14 to 18 medium-caliber guns), captured three Swedish vessels—a ship of the line, a frigate, and a brigantine. The Swedes were commanded by a member of the renowned Wrangel family: seven Wrangels became field marshals, more than thirty became generals (18 of them Russian), and another seven became admirals (two of them Russian).


Ludwig Richard. “The battleship Wachmeister battles against the Russian squadron in 1719.”

Successful landings on the Swedish coast began in July 1719, with Russian troops commanded by F. Apraksin and P. Lassi. They captured eight towns and 1363 villages, burned 140 country houses and castles of Swedish aristocrats, and destroyed 21 factories, 21 mills, and 26 military warehouses.

Meanwhile, Peter I launched a campaign in Persia in 1723, during which the Russian army captured Derbent and Baku. To support the troops, a Caspian flotilla was established in Astrakhan in 1722, consisting of 200 island boats (islands—flat-bottomed rowboats with a capacity of up to 40 people, capable of navigating only in shallow waters) and 45 lastovs (cargo, transport, and auxiliary vessels for the sailing fleet).

In 1723, a strange adventure took place, attempting to accept Madagascar pirates into Russian citizenship. However, two frigates sent to the island immediately sprang leaks and returned to Reval. Vitus Bering's First Kamchatka Expedition proved far more successful.


The First Kamchatka Expedition on the Map

Even Peter the Great's beloved brainchild, the Baltic Fleet, began to decline even during the emperor's lifetime. In recent years, the number of ships being laid down sharply declined: one in 1722, one in 1723, two in 1724, and one in 1725. Meanwhile, at that time, maintaining the fleet's strength required three ships per year.

During the reign of Peter the Great, 90 large ships were built—58 ships of the line and 32 frigates. Five and 13, respectively, were dismantled due to dilapidation. Two ships of the line and six frigates had to be rebuilt, three ships of the line were sold, and one ship of the line and three frigates were captured by the Swedes. Another 10 ships of the line and three frigates were simply lost for various reasons. One frigate remained unfinished. As a result, at the time of Peter the Great's death, there were approximately 800 vessels in the Baltic, and only 48 of them were ships of the line and frigates. Their fate was tragic: practically never sailing, Peter's ships quickly rotted at their moorings, as they were built from damp timber.

The fleet under Catherine I and Peter II


Peter's first successors had no time for naval vessels. Empress Catherine I spent the rest of her life at the dinner table, and 10% of the Russian budget was then spent on purchasing Tokaj wine for the royal court. It was no coincidence that I. M. Vasilevsky called Peter I's widow

a wonderful housekeeper, a very good maid of those who have been considered devotees for all ages and only in old age manage to steal a tidy sum from the benefactor who trusts her.


Ekaterina Alekseevna, engraving, 1724

The state of the fleet can be judged by the account of General Admiral F. Apraksin, who testifies that soon after the death of the first emperor, in 1725:

Not only did not all ships sail in an orderly manner and did not follow their commander (flagship)... some captains did not sail as prescribed by maritime art.

And also that many of the sailors did not have "They were naked and barefoot, some of them even had shirts, and some of them were wearing no uniforms.".

The funds allocated were so small that in May 1726 Apraksin was forced to lend the naval treasury two thousand rubles from his own funds.


F. Apraksin in a portrait by an unknown artist of the 18th century.

Peter II, the Emperor's grandson, who ascended the throne in May 1728, was, contrary to popular belief, a very promising teenager. Vice-Chancellor A. Osterman, appointed as Peter Alexeevich's tutor and mentor, discovered that at the time of their meeting, the 11-year-old boy knew four arithmetic operations, Latin, and spoke French and German fluently, as well as being an excellent marksman with real rifles and cannons. He was tall, strong beyond his years, and even "angelically beautiful".


A.P. Antropov. Portrait of Emperor Peter II in a wig

But the young emperor fell in with the "bad company" of the Dolgorukys, who took him hunting, taught him how to play cards, and "how to treat women." However, he was only 14 years old at the time of his death, and the example of Charles XII proves that even frivolous and flighty scoundrels can sometimes grow into excellent warriors. Even the French king Louis XIV, if he attracted attention in his early years, was only for his misbehavior.

Under the second emperor, five ships of the line and one frigate, construction of which had begun under Peter the Great, were commissioned. Of the new vessels, only galleys were built. One of his decrees, Peter II ordered that existing sailing warships be "preserved," but not deployed to sea. "to avoid losses"Conclusions can be drawn about the condition of these vessels. In his November 1728 report to Stockholm, the Swedish envoy praised the Russian ground forces, but wrote of the navy that the number of galleys, despite the construction of new ones, had greatly diminished, and the naval fleet "in utter ruin" — the ships of the line are almost rotten and only four or five of them can go to sea.

Peter II himself once said:

When necessity requires the use of ships, I will go to sea; but I do not intend to stroll along it like my grandfather.

The young emperor died unexpectedly of smallpox at the age of only 14, and the following inscription was carved on his tombstone:

Having briefly given hope to his subjects for great blessings, by God's will he passed away in the year 1730, January 18. The joy of our hearts was scattered, our face turned to weeping, the crown fell from our heads, woe to us, for we have sinned.

The Russian imperial throne now passed to the daughter of the "senior" tsar, Ivan V. Anna Ioannovna became the last pure-blooded Russian representative of the Romanov dynasty on the Russian throne.

We will discuss naval affairs during the reign of the "female reign" of three Russian empresses in the next article.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    April 25 2026 06: 07
    I have one question: how much Tokaj could have been purchased in 1726 for 1,5 million rubles?
    1. +6
      April 25 2026 07: 24
      You can transport it slowly through all the customs checkpoints and steal half the allocated money.
      The main thing for the Empress is that there is something on the table.
      1. +6
        April 25 2026 20: 02
        To each his own, but to the lousy he's to the bathhouse.
        Let us note, by the way, that ships were often built not from sawn, but from hewn boards - and therefore from a huge log one board was obtained.

        It's more complicated than that. Initially, the log was split into two or three (or four) pieces. Then it was hewn, producing a hewn board. So, from a single log, two to four boards were obtained.
        By the way, hewn boards are much more durable than sawn ones.
    2. +3
      April 25 2026 09: 03
      Incidentally, it is said that Colonel Vishnevsky brought Elizabeth Petrovna's longtime lover (and even, it seems, husband), Alexei Razumovsky, to court on his way back from buying Tokaj wine for the court. He heard him singing in church on the way and decided he would be useful for the court chapel. However, this was already during Anna Ioannovna's reign.
    3. +6
      April 25 2026 13: 31
      In the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, a little earlier, a barrel (136 liters) of Węgrzyn brand wine cost around one hundred zlotys (ducats)
      And the delivery. True, we had a detachment of Cossacks there for quality control, so we can only guess what that one and a half million consisted of (and how accurate the figure is).
  2. +3
    April 25 2026 07: 22
    It's interesting about Nikolaev. Yes, they stole. But they built houses with the stolen goods. For themselves. Now let's ask the question: what to build with in Nikolaev? There's nothing there. Everything has to be brought in from far away.
    And here's the result of this theft—the city. Some of the buildings might still be standing. Then Admiral Butakov will come and restore order. And the city is gone. Who needs all this then? I don't know what Konstantin stole, but he clearly had a knack for state affairs.
    1. +3
      April 25 2026 10: 05
      But Nikolaev wasn't just home to thieves. The majority of the buildings were the shacks of the poor, which would have been built even without the thieving of higher-ups.
      1. +1
        April 25 2026 13: 33
        Quote: vet
        But Nikolaev wasn't just home to thieves. The majority of the buildings were the shacks of the poor, which would have been built even without the thieving of higher-ups.

        I have information that Nikolaev was originally designed for development and was inhabited by shipyard and trade workers - clearly not the poor then and in general was the 3rd richest city in the empire at one time, and where did you get the information about the shacks?
        1. 0
          April 25 2026 13: 37
          A city back then—no poverty? Entirely rich and middle class? No, of course not. They needed construction workers, who clearly didn't live in mansions, and all sorts of service workers. For every wealthy person, there were probably at least 10 people barely scraping by.
          1. +1
            April 25 2026 13: 39
            Quote: vet
            A city back then—no poverty? Entirely rich and middle class? No, of course not. They needed construction workers, who clearly didn't live in mansions, and all sorts of service workers. For every wealthy person, there were probably at least 10 people barely scraping by.

            Your phrase sounded different... as if 90% of the city is shacks... for me personally, a "shack" is something like "made of shacks and sticks with beggars inside."
          2. 0
            16 August 2026 21: 10
            The serfs lived in barracks with earthen floors and slept on bunk beds.
  3. -2
    April 25 2026 08: 31
    Since Peter the Great's ships hardly ever went to sea, they quickly rotted at their moorings because they were built from damp timber.

    This is the essence of the first emperor's character: quickly, over the knee, and through another, less respectable organ. Wait, prepare an army, build proper ships, and only then declare war on the Swedes? No, that's not him. Dress the boyars in German clothes and think they're Dutch? Yes! Dig canals full of dirty water in St. Petersburg (they'll be immediately filled in after Peter's death) and think they're canals, and St. Petersburg is Amsterdam? Double yes. And so on.
    1. +9
      April 25 2026 10: 36
      Dig canals with dirty water in St. Petersburg (they will be immediately filled in after Peter's death) and think that these are canals, and St. Petersburg is Amsterdam? Don't be so quick to evaluate the history of St. Petersburg's urban development in the heat of debate. They were filled in when the urgent need for them disappeared. The portions necessary for the city were left, and you can still see them today.
    2. +7
      April 25 2026 13: 35
      Quote: vet
      This is the whole essence of the character of the first emperor: faster, over the knee

      Otherwise it wouldn't have worked out at all.
      Quote: vet
      Wait, prepare an army, build proper ships, and only then declare war on the Swedes?

      One question, where are you going to build normal ships for the war with the Swedes, BEFORE it starts?
      Peter, for all his faults, was a persistent man who knew how to correct his mistakes. Didn't manage to take Azov on the first try? He did it on the second! Suffered defeat at Narva? But then came Poltava. And so on.
      1. 0
        April 25 2026 13: 42
        Didn't manage to take Azov on the first try? Got it on the second!

        And how did it all end for Azov under Peter? And for other cities? They gave it up without a fight after the Prut campaign.
        Regarding the first point, are you sure such an army was worth sending into battle? Why? To kill a few thousand Russian men? Or should I have spent a couple of years training soldiers and officers? And how can you start a war with a maritime power without a fleet of good, high-quality ships? Counting on what? Just a chance?
        1. +5
          April 25 2026 13: 55
          Quote: vet
          And how did it all end for Azov under Peter? And for other cities? They gave it up without a fight after the Prut campaign.

          What can you do? Pyotr Alekseevich died and didn't manage to do everything he planned...
          Quote: vet
          And regarding the first point, are you sure that such an army was worth leading into battle?

          I'm embarrassed to ask, but what do you think the army exists for? To reach Crimea, losing many times more "Russian men" than you're so sad about, and then return empty-handed?
          Quote: vet
          Or should we spend a couple of years training soldiers and officers?

          And how do you know they are ready?
          Quote: vet
          How can you start a war with a naval power without a fleet of good, high-quality ships? Relying on what? On chance?

          I have a counter-question. How can you enter into a discussion knowing so little about the topic?
          Brief background. In the Great Northern War, three powers opposed the Swedes: Russia, Saxony (unified with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth), and Denmark. The naval theater was the Danish domain. It so happened that the allies quickly merged. This is not Peter's fault. But left alone, he still managed.
  4. 0
    April 25 2026 10: 04
    I wonder how and why this happened, but while Russian Navy ships were powered by sails and carried non-rifled naval guns, their naval victories were truly impressive. Once sails were replaced by engines on Russian Navy ships, and rifled naval guns replaced smoothbore naval guns, the Russian Navy's naval victories seemingly dried up...
    1. -2
      April 25 2026 10: 07
      The level of education was low under the Tsars, and working with machines is not like raising and lowering sails.
      1. 0
        April 25 2026 13: 36
        In the 18th century, particularly under Peter the Great and Catherine the Great, the active creation of specialized educational institutions began, such as navigation, engineering, and garrison schools, as well as the first commercial school. Thus, the 18th century marked a transition period from elite education to more widespread access, although literacy was still not universal.
        Prussia and Germany: Leaders in primary education. Compulsory primary school was introduced (in Prussia, in 1717), also in the 18th century.
        1. 0
          April 25 2026 16: 11
          a transitional period from elite education to more widespread

          In the end, Russia never made it under the emperors; they were waiting for the Bolsheviks, and they did it.
          1. +3
            April 25 2026 19: 47
            What does literacy under Peter the Great have to do with the Bolsheviks? The Bolsheviks represent less than 5% of Russian history—and the article isn't even close to being about them, either. Or are you, like Svoy 1970, talking about the USSR at every opportunity?
    2. +3
      April 25 2026 13: 48
      Quote: north 2
      As long as the ships of the Russian Navy were sailing and had non-rifled naval guns, the victories of the Russian Navy in naval battles were truly impressive.

      Colleague, let's be objective. All our "impressive" victories over our enemies in the naval battles of the sailing era were achieved against two opponents: the Swedes and the Turks. We never really gave the British or the French a run for their money...
      And when guns became rifled and ships were equipped with engines, nothing much changed. True, the Swedes didn't fight us during this era, but the Turks did. In 1877, they had fifteen different ironclads in the Black Sea. We had two "popovkas" and armed steamships with minelayers. And our sailors took them out in a single blow!
    3. +2
      April 25 2026 18: 04
      In the sailing fleet, much can be gained from the moral and willpower of a simple sailor.
      But that doesn't work with machines. Different qualities are required. And these are precisely the qualities that bosses almost always discourage.
  5. 0
    April 25 2026 11: 52
    The main reason we don't have a proper Navy is that no one needs one. Who, what class, or social group needs a proper Navy, even now?
    The state? Why the navy? To guarantee sovereignty. That's what our submarine fleet does, or rather, the naval component of the Strategic Nuclear Forces and what supports it. Judging by what I've read in the news, the submarine fleet's overall condition is sound and capable of fulfilling its mission.
    A surface fleet? Who needs it? To threaten a potential enemy? That would require a ton of resources we don't have. Essentially, our surface fleet is reduced to coastal defense and a few inherited rarities.
    As a positive example, let's look at our icebreaker fleet. In terms of displacement and horsepower, what's already been built and will be built is sufficient for two full-fledged icebreaker groups. Now the question is, who needs such a powerful icebreaker fleet? Should I list them, or can you guess?
    1. -1
      April 25 2026 12: 38
      In fact, our surface fleet is reduced to coastal defense and the rarities we inherited.

      Incidentally, the fate of the modern Black Sea Fleet is indicative: it lost its flagship (the cruiser Moskva), sank or damaged 20 ships and one submarine, and reduced its 13 landing ships to five. The ships were forced to withdraw from Sevastopol, but they are also under attack in Novorossiysk. There's no talk of using the ships in naval combat operations or amphibious assaults. However, "jokers" have long been "deciphering" its name as "whether it's a fleet or not a fleet."
      1. 0
        April 25 2026 12: 45
        All hope lies with the nuclear-powered submarines of the Northern and Pacific Fleets; I hope they are in perfect order and in full combat readiness.
        1. +4
          April 25 2026 13: 20
          Quote: vet
          I hope they are in perfect order and in full combat readiness.

          Read someone other than Ryzhov and you'll find out... request
    2. +4
      April 25 2026 13: 23
      Quote: Not the fighter
      Why a navy? To guarantee sovereignty. This is what our submarine fleet does, or rather, the naval component of the Strategic Nuclear Forces and what supports it.

      It is to ensure that submarines are on combat duty that a surface fleet and aviation are needed.
      Quote: Not the fighter
      Judging by what I read in the news, the general condition of the submarine fleet is reasonable and ensures the completion of the mission.

      Blessed is he who believes.
  6. +4
    April 25 2026 13: 19
    Sometimes I still get smitten with Ryzhov...
    The result was unexpected: Konstantin, whom many contemporaries suspected of close ties to Black Sea thieves and embezzlers, issued Butakov a severe reprimand, and six months later the overly principled governor was transferred to the Baltic.

    But without speculation?
    What was being built in Nikolaev at that time? Nothing!
    At that time, the Baltic was intensively building new types of ships, which needed competent officers.
    In other words, VK Konstantin transferred the promising officer to the Baltic, where he made a very respectable career, rising to the rank of full admiral, was the head of an armored squadron, the senior flagship of the fleet, and so on.
    Konstantin Nikolaevich punished him like that...
    How does one fit this into one's head?
    P.S. And by the way, which VK "contemporaries" suspected this?
  7. +3
    April 25 2026 18: 06
    Alexander Manuilov's speech, delivered at a meeting of the Free Economic Society, included the following words:

    In the course of a thousand years of history, nowhere has there been such a predatory and useless waste of public funds as in the construction of warships in the Black Sea...
    That is, Admiral Nakhimov took over... rotten ships, on which he miraculously achieved... the most famous victory of the Russian fleet at Sinop. belay request

    Meanwhile, Nakhimov believed that a commander should be involved in the construction of his ship from the moment it was laid down. This was the case with the frigate Pallada, the battleship Silistria, and others. He personally monitored the quality of materials, the strength of the case and convenience of the deck for the crew.

    According to Nakhimov, The ships of the Russian fleet of the first half of the 19th century were comparable in seaworthiness and military characteristics (artillery, stability) with the ships of the leading maritime powers, such as Great Britain.

    In 1858, Rear Admiral Grigory Butakov, the military governor of Sevastopol and Nikolaev, wrote to the Grand Duke and General Admiral Konstantin Nikolaevich:

    Almost all of Nikolaev with its huge houses, most of which quietly expose to the street only three, and often five, windows, was built from them (stolen government money).
    The city of Nikolaev was built...even before Butakov was born according to the plan of the architect Starov in 1790, using government money.

    In 1798, the Austrian traveler Balthasar Hackett visited Nikolaev during his trip to the Northern Black Sea region. He left the following memoirs of the city:
    “I took the direct road to Nikolaev, the most beautiful city in the steppes of all TauridaIt has many large streets, with detached houses, columns, beautiful squares and the large Admiralty building along with the shipyard.»
    1. -3
      April 25 2026 18: 43
      Admiral Nakhimov took over the rotten ships on which he miraculously achieved the Russian fleet's most famous victory at Sinop.

      Victory over the antediluvian Ottoman fleet. Nakhimov himself took this victory hard, considering himself almost... guilty of a war Russia could not win. And, according to many accounts, he sought death.
      As for Nikolaev, we're talking about personal (private) property, and private homes—yes—were built with government money, but stolen. Those very same private, columned, detached homes that Gacket writes about with admiration and Butakov with indignation.
      1. Fat
        +4
        April 25 2026 21: 38
        On November 5 (17), 1853, the first battle in history between steamships took place, in which the Ottoman 10-gun steamship Pervaz-Bahre and the 11-gun steam frigate Vladimir, on which the Chief of Staff of the Black Sea Fleet, Rear Admiral Kornilov, was on board, took part.
        Well, in general, the battle is quite modern for the mid-19th century.
        1. +3
          April 26 2026 10: 04
          There was a more glorious example.
          The 44-gun sailing frigate Flora faced three Turkish steam frigates in the Battle of Cape Pitsunda. The Turks were commanded by an Englishman.
          1. Fat
            +2
            April 26 2026 11: 02
            hi The frigate Flora was a sailing ship. And this was the first time two steamships had ever fought... Nine years before the Monitor's duel with the Virginia, according to some researchers, the latter changed the subsequent history of naval shipbuilding...
            Therefore, IMHO, Kornilov’s victory in the battle of steamships is more significant.
            With respect.
            1. +1
              April 26 2026 13: 46
              Quote: Thick
              The frigate "Flora" is a sailing ship.

              Exactly! And it was attacked by three steamships, which, by the way, had superior armament.
  8. 0
    April 25 2026 21: 22
    "...Here, a Swedish squadron confronted the Russians, consisting of 15 ships of the line, 3 frigates, 2 bombardiers (sailing two-masted vessels with 12-14 large-caliber cannons or 2-4 mortars, which were used for bombarding fortresses and ports) and 9 galleys. They were not faced with large seagoing ships, but with 99 Russian galleys, scampavii (lightweight galleys with two masts for lateen sails and armed with 1-2 small-caliber cannons, which could carry up to 150 soldiers) and auxiliary vessels. This battle became the largest naval engagement between Sweden and Russia in the Great Northern War.

    The description of the Battle of Gangut is a bit odd: it seems as if the Russian rowboat fleet clashed head-on with Vatrang's entire squadron. In fact, the battle itself was fought against a small detachment of Schoutbenacht Ehrenskjöld, consisting of a pram, six galleys, and three skerryboats. This is what is depicted in the engraving.
    1. +2
      April 26 2026 10: 05
      Quote: Ryazanets87
      A strange description of the Battle of Gangut

      If I remember correctly, it was the same in the school textbook. I was later very surprised to learn that the reality was a little different. request
      1. +1
        April 26 2026 10: 25
        It's clear where this stems from. Generally, it's logical to distinguish between "Great" and "Small" Gangut. One of the most interesting battles of the Russian fleet—they simply "changed their minds" against the Swedes in an extremely difficult situation.
  9. +2
    April 26 2026 09: 56
    Yes, regarding the planks. When I was in Spain a long time ago, the tour guide told us that Spain used to have a completely different climate, and the entire country was covered in forests. But during the Age of Seafaring and the construction of a huge military and merchant fleet, all the trees in Spain were cut down, which led to a complete climate change to a hot, arid climate with desertification.
    1. +2
      April 26 2026 12: 14
      The history of anthropogenic changes in Greece during ancient times (c. 8th century BC – 5th century AD) is fascinating and well-studied. These changes had a significant impact on the region's landscape, ecosystems, and climate. These changes were associated with population growth, agriculture, urbanization, warfare, and technological advances.
      1. Deforestation (Deforestation)
      The reasons:
      * Shipbuilding (for merchant and military fleets, for example, the Athenian fleet in the 5th century BC).
      * Extraction of timber for the construction of houses, temples and public buildings.
      * Production of charcoal for metallurgy (smelting of bronze and iron).
      * Expansion of agricultural land (deforestation for arable land and pastures).
      Effects:
      * Soil erosion due to the lack of trees to hold the soil.
      * Change in the hydrological regime (decrease in the amount of moisture, drying up of rivers).
      * Decrease in biodiversity (disappearance of forest species of flora and fauna).

       2. Agricultural development and soil erosion
      Main crops:
      * Cereals (wheat, barley).
      * Olives and grapes (the basis of the Mediterranean diet).
      * Growing legumes (lentils, peas).
      Problems:
      * Intensive farming has led to soil depletion.
      * Terracing of slopes (to prevent erosion, but sometimes worsened it).
      * Overgrazing (goats and sheep destroyed young tree shoots).

      3. Urbanization and city construction
      Major cities of antiquity:
      * Athens (the center of culture and politics).
      * Corinth (shopping center).
      * Sparta (military polis).
      * Thebes (an influential city in Boeotia).
      Environmental impact:
      * Pollution of water bodies (sewage, craft waste).
      * Deforestation for construction and heating.
      * Changes in hydrology (construction of aqueducts, drainage systems).

      4. Wars and military conflicts
      Examples of wars:
      * Greco-Persian Wars (5th century BC).
      * Peloponnesian War (431–404 BC).
      * Conquests of Alexander the Great (4th century BC).
      Environmental consequences:
      * Destruction of crops and forests (scorched earth tactics).
      * Pollution of soils and water bodies (decomposition of corpses, waste from camps).
      * Destruction of irrigation systems.

      5. Development of metallurgy and crafts
      Base metals:
      * Bronze (an alloy of copper and tin).
      * Iron (since the 7th century BC).
      * Silver and gold (for coins and jewelry).
      Environmental consequences:
      * Air pollution (emissions from metal smelting).
      * Production waste (slag, toxic substances).
      * Soil degradation near mines (for example, in Lavrion, where silver was mined).

      6. Change in the hydrological regime
      * Construction of aqueducts (for example, the aqueduct in Athens to supply water).
      * Drainage of swamps (to expand agricultural land).
      * Siltation of rivers due to soil erosion.

      7. Historical evidence
      * Herodotus and Thucydides mention problems with water supply and soil depletion.
      * Aristotle describes climate change and decreased rainfall.
      * Archaeological evidence (pollen analysis, sediment layers) confirms deforestation and erosion.

      The special influence of goats on the process of climate and landscape change is often considered.
      In ancient Greece, goats played a key role in the transformation of ecosystems. Their impact was so significant that modern ecologists and historians often refer to them as the "biological bulldozer" of the Mediterranean. Here are the main aspects of their impact:

      1. Overgrazing and destruction of vegetation
      * Non-selective feeding: Goats consume all vegetation, from grass to young shoots of trees and shrubs, including bark (unlike sheep, which prefer grass).
      * Preventing forest regeneration: By eating young trees (such as oaks, pines, olives), they prevented the natural regeneration of forests after logging.
      * Pasture degradation: Intensive grazing resulted in loss of grass cover, bare soil and increased erosion.

      2. Deforestation and ecosystem change
      * Accelerated deforestation: Combined with the clearing of forests for construction and fuel, goats cleared out the remaining forests, especially in mountainous areas (such as the Peloponnese or Attica).
      * Change of plant communities:
      * Deforestation → replacement by maquis (evergreen shrubs that are resistant to grazing).
      * Spread of xerophytic species (plants adapted to drought), such as thyme, rosemary, and wild savory.
      * Loss of biodiversity: disappearance of shade-loving and moisture-loving species.

      3. Soil erosion and landscape degradation
      * Slope exposure: Without vegetation, rainwater washed away the topsoil, exposing the rock.
      * Formation of gullies (ravines): In mountainous areas (for example, in Arcadia) erosion led to the formation of deep gullies.
      * Siltation of rivers and water resources: Washed-away soil filled riverbeds, reducing their capacity and deteriorating water quality.

      4. Historical and archaeological evidence
      * Plato (4th century BC) in his dialogue Critias describes how Attica was once covered with dense forests, but by his time had become bare rocks, partly due to goat grazing.
      * Thucydides notes that in the Peloponnesian War (431–404 BC), scorched earth (including from cattle breeding) aggravated the famine.
      * Pollen analysis (palynology) shows a sharp decrease in tree pollen (oak, pine) and an increase in shrub and weed pollen from the 8th century BC, which correlates with the rise of cattle breeding.

      5. Socio-economic consequences
      * Agricultural crisis: Soil depletion and loss of forests led to a decline in crop yields, which provoked famine and migrations (for example, the great Greek colonization of the 8th–6th centuries BC).
      * Conflicts over pastures: Disputes between farmers and shepherds (for example, in Sparta, the helot farmers clashed with the perioeci, herders).
      * Adaptation of the economy: The Greeks were forced to switch to terracing the slopes and growing olives and grapes - crops less vulnerable to erosion and grazing.

      6. Long-term environmental consequences
      * Irreversible landscape degradation: Many areas of Greece (e.g. the Cyclades islands) have never regained their forest cover since antiquity.
      * Formation of the modern Mediterranean landscape: Today's Mediterranean scrubland (maquis, garigue) is the result of thousands of years of influence by goats and humans.