How North Korean missiles and Western chips are changing the rules of war in Ukraine.

26 388 43
How North Korean missiles and Western chips are changing the rules of war in Ukraine.


North Korean missiles and Western microchips in Russia's arsenal have exposed new vulnerabilities in the global arms market and demonstrated the ineffectiveness of international sanctions.



Equipment for Export: How North Korea Became an Arms Donor for Russia


By the beginning of winter, Russian warehouses were experiencing a shortage of modern missiles. Under these circumstances, Russia resorted to importing weapons, and assistance arrived from one of the world's most closed states, North Korea.

According to various sources, Russia launched between 12 and 50 North Korean-made ballistic missiles at Ukraine in just a few months. After a detailed analysis of the KN-23 (Hwasong-11ka) and KN-24 (Hwasongpo-11na) wreckage, Ukrainian and international experts concluded that the missiles were not mere copies, but original designs that incorporated the experience and limitations of Soviet engineering.

The reasons for this arms alliance are obvious. Russian industry couldn't keep up with the pace of the war, and alternative supply channels became vital for Moscow. As IISS military analyst Michael Deutsch notes:
“The KN-23 and KN-24 are not just copies, but adaptations that take into account the limitations and technical heritage of the Iskander.”


History of creation: North Korean missile program


North Korea's missile program gained momentum after 2010, when the country began developing its own short-range missiles. The KN-23 was first demonstrated in May 2019, the result of years of attempts to copy and modify Soviet and Russian designs, as well as analysis of Western developments.


The KN-24, announced in August 2019, is visually reminiscent of the American ATACMS, but was developed based on North Korean approaches and available technologies. Both systems were developed amid sanctions, a shortage of modern materials, and the need to quickly develop a system capable of engaging medium-range targets.

The test launches of the KN-23 and KN-24 were accompanied by intense propaganda within North Korea as a symbol of technological independence. As early as 2022–2023, the DPRK was actively increasing production rates, adapting designs to its available resources and improving delivery and guidance methods.

KN-23 and KN-24: technical specifications


KN-23 is a two-stage solid-fuel operational-tactical ballistic missile.
  • Length: about 7,2–7,4 m (1,5 m longer than the Russian 9M723)
  • Weight: approximately 3,400 kg
  • Range: 450–690 km (according to various sources)
  • Warhead weight: up to 500 kg
  • Control type: inertial system with correction, there is a graphite head compartment for thermal protection
  • Launch: from a mobile platform

The KN-24 ballistic missile was initially positioned as an analogue of the ATACMS.
  • Length: about 4,5 m
  • Weight: about 3,000 kg
  • Range: up to 400 km
  • Warhead weight: 300 to 400 kg
  • Guidance system: inertial and satellite, according to a number of data
  • Launcher: mobile tracked or wheeled

Both missiles use fuel that is less energy-dense than that used in modern Russian systems, requiring larger engines. The software and hardware control units contain civilian microcircuits, often manufactured by Western companies in 2022–2023. A graphite cone was chosen for the warhead's thermal protection—a necessary solution due to the sanctions-related shortage of modern materials.

The Gray Market for Components and the Failure of Sanctions


The appearance of Western microchips in North Korean missiles demonstrates the limitations of current sanctions regimes. Research centers CNA and CSIS confirm that North Korea obtains key components through front companies in China, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East.

“The component database shows supplies from countries that nominally support sanctions: without global oversight, such practices will only intensify.”

— CNAS report, 2023




A quantitative analysis of the debris shows that the share of civilian electronics in foreign military missiles is growing, while exporter oversight does not cover all channels.

Two-Capital Versions: Official Explanations from Moscow and Kyiv


The Ukrainian side provides expert opinions, fragment analysis, and confirmation from allied intelligence agencies, documenting the North Korean origin of the missiles and evidence of sanctions violations.

"Russia is using North Korean missiles to fire on Ukrainian territory. This is confirmed by analysis of the debris and the discovery of foreign-made components. This practice violates international sanctions."

— Ministry of Defense of Ukraine

Russia claims that all weapons used are "domestic" and not subject to sanctions. Official statements make no mention of North Korean missiles. International institutions and the UN publicly note that the missiles' technical parameters match those of North Korea.

New rules of war and a borderless market


North Korean KN-23 and KN-24 have become more than just a new thing for Ukraine weapons, but a striking example of the fragility of global export controls. Even if North Korea, under harsh sanctions, gains access to modern technology, formal barriers cease to apply. In modern conflicts, the winner is the one who can secure the supply of weapons—even in circumvention of all formal restrictions.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 28
    April 18 2026 08: 03
    The DPRK is Russia's only friend and they have always treated us well, even when Yeltsin's gang betrayed them, they kept good memories of the USSR!
    1. -24
      April 18 2026 08: 32
      Come on. They helped us with manpower, weapons, and suddenly our only friend? They do it for money, and apparently a lot of it. We have no friends. It's time to realize this and stop relying on anyone.
      Friends are only found in real life. And even then, true ones are usually few and far between. So where are they going to come from in politics?
      1. + 16
        April 18 2026 09: 46
        Quote: Chersky
        We have no friends. It's time to understand this and stop relying on anyone.

        Let's not talk about the DPRK in this way. We can't get under Kim's skin and see what's going on there. Kim's help is tangible and timely. For which, I believe, we are all grateful.
      2. +3
        April 18 2026 12: 41
        So why hasn't Trump bought himself some "friends" from European countries? They're supposedly NATO allies, but they seem reluctant to help the "hegemon."
        Of course, you can't provide a link to Russian payment documents for Koreans... it's just out of thin air.
    2. +6
      April 18 2026 09: 04
      This practice violates international sanctions.
      What the hell are sanctions? During military operations. Everyone, with these sanctions, on an erotic journey. negative
      1. +1
        April 19 2026 04: 14
        In response to sanctions, Russia and North Korea are launching missiles at the Ukrainian people. Russia is assisting Iran with targeting and military assistance.
        Sanctions have led the West into a financial crisis.
    3. +5
      April 18 2026 09: 45
      Maybe we should order a missile from the North Koreans with a range of 1,500 to 2,000 kilometers and a 3-5 ton warhead for strikes on key bridges, transport hubs, and other strategic targets? It would probably be quicker, and we wouldn't need nuclear weapons. Otherwise, we'll never see the paralysis of the entire transport infrastructure of the Soviet Union.
      1. -1
        April 18 2026 21: 07
        a 3-5 ton warhead for strikes on key bridges
        How are you going to ensure a 3-meter CEP for a silly missile with a 3-5-ton warhead? Even better, we could do it like the Iskander. 10-meter CEP. Well, we can probably agree that it will miss somewhere. Accepted. Can you even imagine the inertia of a silly missile with that weight? How will it maneuver, what will it use to hit a 10-meter CEP with a 3-5-ton warhead? And how much will such a "bulk" cost? Assuming the bridge is rebuilt in two weeks, if they just demolish the bridge deck and the supports are still standing.
        1. +4
          April 19 2026 06: 11
          Your bridges are being restored way too quickly. The Crimean one took almost three months to fully restore. Sure, you can build a pontoon bridge in a day, but not everywhere.
  2. +4
    April 18 2026 08: 07
    So what now? Some Ukrainian Dima will write that the Russian Armed Forces are using North Korean missiles to strike Ukrainian territory. The address and location are known. What then?
    1. 0
      April 18 2026 09: 21
      Quote: Zyablicev43
      The address and location are known. What's next?

      And then, let this Ukrainian Dima or someone else go to this very address. wink
      on an erotic journey.
  3. +9
    April 18 2026 08: 12
    Russia claims that all weapons used are “domestic” and are not subject to sanctions. But do they have to justify anything at all?
    1. +2
      April 18 2026 09: 28
      Quote: Gagrid
      Russia claims that all weapons used are “domestic”

      The logic behind the X-s is understandable. As we know from Hollywood movies, almost all Soviet/Russian weapons, components, and assemblies are marked with the letter "Ы." And "Ы" is "Ын." 100%
  4. +3
    April 18 2026 08: 22
    changing the rules of war in Ukraine
    And where is Ukraine?
    1. +1
      April 18 2026 08: 31
      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
      And where is Ukraine?

      Well, somewhere between Donbass and Pshekiya. For now.
    2. +6
      April 18 2026 09: 35
      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
      And where is Ukraine?

      Replacing "in Ukraine" with "in Ukraine" is a form of propaganda designed to exploit the uneducated population, proving at any cost the oppression of Ukrainians by Russians, claiming that "in Ukraine" was deliberately intended to humiliate the outskirts (now I'm being downright demeaning, an eye for an eye). And those who, through lack of understanding, distort the Russian language under the influence of Bandera propaganda, should be required to write "Who Lives Well in Rus'" on a blackboard 100 times, and once they get used to it, another 100 times "Who Lives Well in Rus'," while simultaneously declaring Nekrasov a proto-Ukrainian and a fighter against the Muscovites.
      1. -1
        April 18 2026 15: 21
        Quote: Chief Officer Lom
        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
        And where is Ukraine?

        Replacing "in Ukraine" with "in Ukraine" is a form of propaganda designed to exploit the uneducated population, proving at any cost the oppression of Ukrainians by Russians, claiming that "in Ukraine" was deliberately intended to humiliate the outskirts (now I'm being downright demeaning, an eye for an eye). And those who, through lack of understanding, distort the Russian language under the influence of Bandera propaganda, should be required to write "Who Lives Well in Rus'" on a blackboard 100 times, and once they get used to it, another 100 times "Who Lives Well in Rus'," while simultaneously declaring Nekrasov a proto-Ukrainian and a fighter against the Muscovites.

        Don't look for a black cat where there isn't one. Different nouns have different pronunciations. Just because you like to pronounce them one way doesn't mean everyone else has to.
        For example, how would you pronounce the phrase "War in Turkey?" or "military action in Iran" differently? Or the phrase "holiday in Russia"? Or the phrase "to go to Chechnya"?
        1. +7
          April 18 2026 18: 51
          Quote: Panin (Michman)
          There is no need to look for a black cat where there is none.

          That's exactly it. In Russia, but in Rus'. In Japan, but in Cuba. That's how it happened. In Ukraine. In Ukraine—a remake, conditioned by the possessed raguls, who are looking for absolutely any, even the most stupid, excuse to emphasize the gap between us, and many actually believed that Na is wrong.
          What about the phrase “go to Chechnya”?

          Is it too much trouble to go to the Caucasus? No need to justify something that was clearly brought in by the enemy.
          Natural changes in language happen, but in Ukraine this is not the case; it is a symbol of lies.
          1. +1
            April 18 2026 21: 46
            “Is it weak to go to the Caucasus?”
            It's Easy! hi This restaurant is a couple of blocks away from me. It's owned by Uzbeks, though. laughing
          2. +3
            April 20 2026 11: 41
            Quote: Chief Officer Lom
            That's exactly it. In Russia, but in Rus'. In Japan, but in Cuba. That's how it happened. In Ukraine. In Ukraine—a remake, conditioned by the possessed raguls, who are looking for absolutely any, even the most stupid, excuse to emphasize the gap between us, and many actually believed that Na is wrong.

            Yeah... the neighbors used to say "na Ukraine," and so did the Ukrainians themselves. But for the sake of national identity, they decided to replace "na" with "v."
            In 1993, at the request of the Ukrainian government, the variants "в Украина" (in Ukraine) and "из Украина" (from Ukraine) were to be recognized as normative. This, according to the Ukrainian government, severed the unsatisfactory etymological connection between the constructions "на Украина" and "на предкрани" (from the border). Ukraine, with the preposition "в" (in), received, according to the Ukrainian government, linguistic confirmation of its status as a sovereign state, since the names of states are formed in the Russian tradition using the prepositions "в" (во) and "из" (from).

            However, the literary norm of the Russian language, according to which one should speak and write in Ukraine, is the result of the historical development of the language over several centuries. The compatibility of the prepositions in and with with certain words is explained solely by tradition. Cf .: at school, at the institute, at the pharmacy, in the department, but: at the factory, at the post office, at the resort, at the warehouse, etc. The literary norm cannot change overnight due to any political processes.

            Even Ukrainian our everything Taras Shevchenko - and he wrote every now and then in Ukraine:
            Yak die, then cheer
            Mene at the grave,
            Sereda is wide,
            On Ukrainian Miles,
  5. 0
    April 18 2026 08: 26
    Can't ramp up missile production in five years? That's a disgrace to our industry and a testament to effective management. But! We don't abandon our own, and they're not lying; they've been making mistakes for years!
    1. +1
      April 18 2026 08: 35
      So missile consumption is growing, and resources are finite. It's easy for you to criticize both industry and management from your couch. It doesn't require any effort.
    2. +3
      April 18 2026 08: 47
      Can't we increase missile production in 5 years?

      Have they ordered so many that they can't produce them all? The answer is NO!!! They produce as many as they order. And North Korea isn't paid in cash, but in food, equipment, and technology.
    3. +5
      April 18 2026 18: 14
      Quote: Tomsk123
      This is a disgrace to our industry.
      It's a fucking disgrace: for decades, this industry was subjected to conversions, optimizations, underfunding, and other such measures, and yet it still didn't completely die and even grew somewhat under the pressure, despite the fact that cooperation and component supply were also destroyed. And if you think the defense industry is getting richer now, you're just imagining it. Sure, they're getting more money now, but they're also producing more products, and their profits are meager, with little to invest in expansion.
    4. 0
      17 May 2026 15: 03
      Quote: Tomsk123
      Can't ramp up missile production in five years? That's a disgrace to our industry and a testament to effective management. But! We don't abandon our own, and they're not lying; they've been making mistakes for years!

      Do you think they fired as many as they produced and then immediately launched? And dear NATO doesn't need to stockpile anything, God forbid it makes a move.
  6. +9
    April 18 2026 08: 29
    So, if the Ukrainians are using Western missiles and shells to attack Russia, what's the problem with Russia using Korean ones? If supplies are to be banned, then it should be to all parties to the conflict, and we'll see how long 404 can survive on purely domestic resources.
    1. +2
      April 18 2026 09: 44
      Quote: Nagan
      If the Ukrainians are using Western missiles and shells to attack Russia, then what's the problem if Russia is using Korean ones? If supplies are to be banned, then they should be banned to all parties to the conflict.

      You clearly didn't pay attention to the wording.
      The Ukrainian Ministry of Defense is not complaining about Russia's use of Korean missiles, but about its circumvention of sanctions:
      This is a practice violates international sanctions

      The West has imposed 100500 sanctions on us, and they are upset among themselves that these sanctions are being violated.
      In principle, it would be absolutely correct, a mirror response, to impose counter-sanctions on the West and respond in the same way: look! You're violating our sanctions! Accordingly, we have to respond to them.
      But for some reason we didn't announce anything to anyone.
      Apparently, our management is happy with everything as is.
      1. +1
        April 19 2026 17: 36
        Our sanctions are like a drop in the bucket for them, but criminal prosecution and confiscation would be helpful. Companies or states that comply with sanctions should be sued for damages and their assets confiscated.
  7. 0
    April 18 2026 09: 26
    The pictures show iron and tangled wires, and not a single electronic component with anyone's markings. One could claim anything, even that it was manufactured on an alien planet. It's well known how the Armed Forces of Ukraine plays with information leaks.
    1. -5
      April 18 2026 09: 39
      YouTube is littered with dissections of probably everything that drives, flies, and explodes on the battlefield these days. It's strange to ignore it.
  8. +2
    April 18 2026 10: 27
    For a missile as popular as the Iskander, I'd go further and try to standardize the missile itself, so that we could simply supply ammunition.
    1. 0
      April 18 2026 18: 16
      Quote: Zaurbek
      For such a popular theater as Iskander
      Sorry, popular where? Only we have it. If you mean making different warheads for a single carrier, then "already."
      1. 0
        April 18 2026 19: 05
        Popular in our Army and popular conceptually on the battlefield with a large consumption of missiles in modern warfare

        I meant standardizing between the allied countries of the DPRK and China. So that everyone would make a missile that is suitable for their national missile systems.
  9. -3
    April 18 2026 11: 33
    Quote: Chief Officer Lom
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    And where is Ukraine?

    Replacing "in Ukraine" with "in Ukraine" is a form of propaganda designed to exploit the uneducated population, proving at any cost the oppression of Ukrainians by Russians, claiming that "in Ukraine" was deliberately intended to humiliate the outskirts (now I'm being downright demeaning, an eye for an eye). And those who, through lack of understanding, distort the Russian language under the influence of Bandera propaganda, should be required to write "Who Lives Well in Rus'" on a blackboard 100 times, and once they get used to it, another 100 times "Who Lives Well in Rus'," while simultaneously declaring Nekrasov a proto-Ukrainian and a fighter against the Muscovites.

    You've already pissed off the language patrols, I've written here on VO ten times that the same people ask the question whose Crimea is and "In" or "Na" in Ukraine. I was born, lived, and still live in Donbas, attended school in the USSR, and we were taught Ukrainian by Soviet teachers. The question "In" or "Na" in Ukrainian was regulated by Rosenthal's handbook, and we were taught to write "In" in Soviet schools. If this bothers you in any way, then you are the language patrol that, both in Ukraine and Russia, is looking for someone to pester and divide people into "us" or "them" simply by pronunciation.
    1. +1
      April 19 2026 22: 40
      This is how the norm you cited looks in the 1971 edition (ROSENTHAL D.E. HANDBOOK OF SPELLING AND LITERARY PROCESSING FOR PRINT WORKERS
      Signed for publication on March 17, 1971): "1) The preposition "in" is used with administrative-geographical names, for example: in the city, in the district, in the region, in the republic; in Siberia, in Belarus, in Transcaucasia. The combination "in Ukraine" arose under the influence of the Ukrainian language (cf.: in Poltava, in Chernihiv) and is supported by the expression "on the outskirts."
  10. 0
    April 18 2026 12: 58
    With such a large area of ​​strategic military operations or warfare, 50 missiles with a 400-500 kg warhead is meaningless. Effective results can only be achieved if the missile count reaches at least thousands per week. Only then will victory be achieved.
  11. 0
    April 18 2026 13: 25
    They don't change anything.
    Everyone does the best they can.
    The use of civilian chips in military applications is possible, but the product's shelf life is severely limited. The military sets strict requirements from the outset.
  12. +2
    April 18 2026 17: 59
    Anatoly Blinov,
    In Russian it is written "na Ukraine" (na Ukraine), not "v Ukraine" (in Ukraine).
    Whose will you be in?
  13. 0
    April 18 2026 18: 02
    Quote: Good
    The DPRK is Russia's only friend and they have always treated us well, even when Yeltsin's gang betrayed them, they kept good memories of the USSR!

    Representatives from various countries are present there for money. The DPRK is also far from free.
  14. -1
    April 18 2026 18: 28
    Quote: AC130 Ganship
    Anatoly Blinov,
    In Russian it is written "na Ukraine" (na Ukraine), not "v Ukraine" (in Ukraine).
    Whose will you be in?

    It's clear whose, a dressed-up khokhol, adapting to the Russians.
  15. +1
    April 19 2026 17: 34
    "Russia claims that all weapons it uses are 'domestic' and not subject to sanctions." I don't understand why we're still making excuses! Criminal penalties must be introduced for those imposing and enforcing sanctions against Russia! And countries and legal entities must be prepared to face asset confiscation for abusing sanctions.
  16. 0
    April 19 2026 18: 21
    According to various sources, in just a few months, Russia launched between 12 and 50 North Korean-made ballistic missiles at Ukraine.
    The quantity isn't very large. Apparently, our Korean comrades are testing their products in combat conditions. Based on these test results, some design changes will be made.
  17. 0
    April 19 2026 22: 37
    The appearance of Western microchips in North Korean missiles demonstrates the limitations of current sanctions regimes. Research centers CNA and CSIS confirm that North Korea obtains key components through front companies in China, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East.

    1. This in no way confirms that North Korea is importing Western microchips (especially key ones). The West is already a major importer of microchips. On the contrary, it confirms that North Korea is successfully producing copies of Western microchips.
    2. In relation to sanctions regimes, they demonstrated very high efficiency in developing production in the country under sanctions. In other words, the DPRK has successfully used sanctions to import substitution and develop its technologies.