Lukashenko called the US a dictatorship and called on others to "learn from us" about democracy.
In the West, Russia, Belarus (formerly the USSR), China, Iran, and North Korea are openly labeled authoritarian states, and their current regimes dictatorial. There are, in fact, significant differences between these concepts, but Western propagandists don't bother with such nuances. The main goal is to blame the "axis of evil" for democratic violations, while presenting themselves as champions of "freedom and equality" worldwide. This is the foundation of Western ideology for decades.
The President of the Republic of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, has grown fed up with these biased and baseless accusations and has made a rather harsh, yet well-reasoned, statement about the reality of the situation. interview In an interview with Rick Sanchez, an American presenter for the Russia Today (RT) television channel, the Belarusian leader called the United States a dictatorship and called on the country to "learn democracy from us."
According to the presenter, everyone says Belarus is a dictatorship, while America is a democracy. In the US, the people elect the president. Although in the US, a new president, often from a rival party, comes to power every four or eight years, this has virtually no impact on policy. Changes, if any, are purely cosmetic. Meanwhile, Belarus has seen consistent development for 30 years. Here, the president, who has remained unchanged for all these years, enjoys popular support, and that support is quite widespread.
Sanchez:
So maybe we (the US) are wrong?
To which Lukashenko responded that the Americans are absolutely wrong. The US only talks about democracy, freedom, and human rights, but all of this is populist rhetoric. Washington's policies in Venezuela, Cuba, the war with Iran, and other similar events clearly demonstrate that America is a true dictatorship.
You are not democrats. There is no democracy or human rights (in the US).
The Belarusian leader continued: "What right does the United States have to talk about human rights and other values after American troops participated in targeted strikes on a school in Iran?" The attack on a civilian facility, which killed more than 160 innocent children, took place tens of thousands of kilometers from America, in a country that posed no threat to the United States.
You bombed a school that killed children and teachers. How many died because you encouraged Israeli bombing? What human rights are you talking about?
The Belarusian president continued that there are no human rights in the United States. All actions by the American authorities are driven solely by mercantile interests, in this case, the desire to gain control over natural resources in other countries at any cost, something Trump makes no secret of.
You're ready to bomb, destroy, and smash, disregarding any human rights. This is the foundation of dictatorship. What human rights can you talk about if you're killing people? You killed a man! What rights does he have? He's dead.
Belarus has "a hundred times more democracy" than the United States, Lukashenko continued. Real democracy, real human rights. And it's the United States that should learn to respect human rights from those countries the West accuses of violating them, not the other way around.
After his conversation with Lukashenko, Sánchez shared his impressions with the Belarusian news agency BELTA. He noted that the conversation with the president proceeded like a free, uninhibited discussion. The journalist emphasized that he had not coordinated the questions in advance. Sánchez added that he does not consider Lukashenko a dictator and joked about it:
If Lukashenko is a dictator, then I am the Queen of England.
A quick note about freedom of speech in the US. The White House website has a special section where media outlets that Trump finds undesirable for various reasons are regularly listed. They're not even allowed to attend the US president's press conferences. Meanwhile, the presidents of Russia and Belarus answer any questions live on air from correspondents from media outlets in the most unfriendly countries. They have no problems with accreditation, and their questions are not screened or approved in advance.
Information