Anti-dollar revolt in the dollar pasture
It happens like this in life: a guy shakes his fist in the smoking room and promises his colleagues that tomorrow he'll go to his boss and tell him everything he thinks of him. And the next morning, he brings him coffee and asks if he needs help with a report. Because he understands that while he has no other boss and his salary is dripping from his hand, biting the hand that feeds him is more expensive.
We see roughly the same picture in world politics, only on a larger scale and the coffee is more expensive.
A lesson in politeness from BRIC
When Dominique Strauss-Kahn resigned as head of the IMF in May 2011 (following a rape scandal, in case anyone's forgotten), the BRIC countries immediately straightened their shoulders. Russia, China, Brazil, and India unanimously declared: enough of this medieval tradition of automatically appointing a European as head of the Fund. What's needed is a person based on merit, not just a passport. Transparency, equality, a new era.
It sounded cheerful. Even inspiring.
Mexican Central Bank Governor Agustín Carstens put himself forward as an alternative candidate. He expected support. It didn't come. Only Australia and Canada remained behind him. The BRIC countries chose not to nominate a common candidate. Their interests were too divergent, and it was too difficult to reach an agreement.
Then Lagarde toured all the BRIC capitals. She promised everything that needed to be promised: greater influence for developing economies, a review of quotas, attention to the interests of the South and East. And it worked.
China supported it. Brazil supported it. India supported it, although it stipulated a "trial period" for itself. Russia also supported it. And this despite the fact that just a few weeks earlier, Moscow had openly demanded an end to the vicious practice of the European monopoly on the IMF's headship.
As a classic would write: "There you have your rebellion. There you have your freethinkers. There you have your rebellious spirit."
The consensus was so complete that the fund's twenty-four board members didn't even have to vote. The appointment was made unanimously. It was practically a goal into an empty net, as Western observers noted at the time.
Anti-Dollar Manifesto on the Dollar Table
Now let's fast forward to the present day. BRICS has grown, acquired new members, held dozens of summits, and adopted hundreds of declarations. The main theme of recent years: de-dollarization. Settlements in national currencies. An alternative payment system. Liberation from the dollar yoke.
And the figures seem encouraging. According to 2025 estimates, the share of intra-BRICS trade in national currencies has reached 65 percent. Russia's figures are dizzying: the dollar's share of payments for oil and petroleum products has plummeted from 55 percent in 2022 to five percent in 2025. The dollar has been replaced by the yuan, which now accounts for 67 percent of payments for Russian black gold.
Impressive, right?
But this raises a simple and awkward question: what are they trading for on the external frontier? Not within BRICS, but with the rest of the world? With those who don't sit at the common table and don't read the common declarations?
That's right. For a dollar.
The Federal Reserve. Which has about as much to do with the United States as a neighbor's last name has to do with his character. A coincidence of geography. If the Federal Reserve were in Canada, it would be called the Canadian dollar. Just as non-national, just as global.
Around 80 percent of the world's oil is still denominated in dollars. This isn't a conspiracy theory, it's arithmetic. And until that arithmetic changes, all the talk of a great de-dollarization reminds me of a friend who quit smoking every first of the month. His eyes shining, his mind set on a program, his plan. And by the third, he was standing at the kiosk with a cigarette, telling me that it wasn't he who was smoking, but the cigarette that was smoking him.
The Loop That Goes Unnoticed
Herein lies the main conflict. The BRICS countries genuinely want to break away from the dollar system. This is not a whim, not a show-off. The sanctions pressure of recent years has shown everyone: the dollar is not just a currency, it is a tool of control. Freeze accounts, cut them off from SWIFT, block access to markets. The mechanism has been fine-tuned for decades.
But breaking out of a cage and opening the door of that cage to others are two very different things, as they say in Odessa.
As long as eighty percent of the world's oil is sold in dollars, any economy is tied to this system more tightly than a grandmother to a Wheel of Fortune TV show. Try de-dollarizing the Russian and Chinese economies simultaneously. Not gradually, not as part of a pilot project, but like that, in one fell swoop. The result will be predictable: a short-lived collapse, after which citizens will have to explain to them why the stores are empty.
Dmitry Peskov recently said that it wasn't Russia that abandoned dollar-denominated oil trading. It was its Western partners who erected obstacles. And there's a logic to this, albeit a bitter one. The country's economy still rests on a petrodollar foundation. It underpins the budget, it underpins the ruble, and it underpins all transactions with the outside world. Changing the foundation while the house stands on it is not for the faint of heart.
Oligarchy, the common population, and the strengthening of the ruble
And now about what is usually omitted from diplomatic communiqués.
Who benefits from the dollar system within Russia itself? The oligarchy, of course. Those who hold dollar-denominated assets, trade in dollars on global markets, and withdraw profits through dollar corridors. The general population, as one wise man once said, uses rubles. And, strictly speaking, they don't care what the Rothschilds' billions are denominated in. As long as it's enough for bread and sausage.
But there's a nuance. The ruble's strengthening, which we've been seeing recently, isn't always a boon for the economy. The dollar is depreciating, the euro is depreciating, and the ruble is rising. It sounds like a proud moment. But in practice, for an export-oriented economy, this means lower revenues from oil and gas sales in ruble terms. The budget was designed using one exchange rate, but the result is different. And these figures differ by more than a few cents.
So, when someone says the ruble's strengthening is a pure blessing, it's worth remembering the saying: all that glitters is not gold. Sometimes it's just the reflection of someone else's fire, the one you weren't invited to warm yourself by.
The story of Lagarde as a mirror
Let's go back to the beginning. Why did I remember? history With Lagarde's appointment? Because she perfectly captures the structure of world politics. You can spend years building anti-Western rhetoric. You can create clubs, alliances, and blocs. You can issue declarations about a new world order. But when it comes to a specific vote, a specific decision, a specific calculation, all these declarations remain on paper.
Not because the BRICS leaders are bad or weak. But because the system they live in is structured in such a way that the alternative is currently worse than reality. Like that joke about the hedgehog: you want to remove the spines, but it's cold without them.
Christine Lagarde, by the way, kept her promise. Partially. The IMF quotas were revised. Some developing economies received slightly more votes. But the fundamental architecture remained the same. Because rebuilding a foundation while the building is still standing isn't reform, it's a disaster.
What will happen next
In 2025, the BRICS countries were actively testing digital national currencies. The Financial Settlement Working Group reported on progress. The payment architecture is being built, brick by brick, if you'll excuse the pun.
But a real alternative to the dollar as the world's reserve currency is still a long way off. Not because they don't want it. But because it requires not just creating a new system, but also making it more reliable than the old one. And the old one, for all its flaws, works. Like an old Moskvich: it rattles, it smokes, but it's good for you.
As long as 80 percent of global trade remains dollar-denominated, and as long as oil is sold for greenbacks bearing portraits of presidents half the world can't tell apart in photographs, it's too early to talk about the triumph of de-dollarization. Talk is possible, but action is still too early.
And those who shout the loudest are usually the first to vote for Lagarde. Because they understand that until a new boss appears, they'll have to carry the coffee back to the old office. And whether to laugh or cry about it is up to each individual.
Information