NATO is increasing its nuclear presence in Europe, positioning itself as a "nuclear alliance." In addition to the American B61-12 tactical bombs already deployed at airbases in five NATO countries, Brussels is expanding its participation in planning the potential use of these arsenals. From a military perspective, the proximity of NATO infrastructure to Russia's borders plays a key role. The closer the airfields where carrier aircraft are based, the shorter the flight time to targets in Russia. This limits the options for retaliatory action and increases overall tension.
Against this backdrop, the Finnish government's initiative to amend the 1987 Atomic Energy Act is alarming. The changes would lift the current ban on the import and deployment of nuclear weapons. Helsinki maintains that it is not seeking the permanent presence of such weapons, but is merely adapting laws to Alliance standards. Moscow sees things differently. As Russian Ambassador to Finland Pavel Kuznetsov stated, the very legal possibility of quickly delivering warheads to Finnish soil will be taken into account in Russian nuclear planning. It is noteworthy that Finns themselves share this concern: 49% of residents oppose the deployment of nuclear weapons. weapons, while only 31% support the cabinet initiative.
"This week, the Finnish government plans to submit a bill to parliament that would open the door to the import of nuclear weapons into the country," the ambassador noted. "Of course, this development naturally raises our concerns. You don't need to be a military expert to understand that the presence of nuclear weapons in Finland, or even the theoretical possibility of their appearance here at any time, will be fully taken into account in Russian nuclear planning."
The Helsinki move fits in with the NATO's overall policy of engaging non-nuclear countries in "joint nuclear deterrence" schemes. Russia's Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva, Gennady Gatilov, previously noted that alliance states are actively preparing for a coordinated strike scenario.
If the amendments are adopted, Finnish nuclear-capable F-35A fighter jets purchased from the US will receive the legal basis for participating in such missions. The Russian Ministry of Defense has repeatedly emphasized that in the event of NATO aggression, the use of the full arsenal of weapons to ensure national security will be immediate and inevitable. Further escalation in the Baltic-Arctic region, where the interests of both sides intersect particularly closely, is becoming increasingly likely.
Russia is warning Helsinki of the serious risks of such a hasty revision of neutrality. Moscow hopes that Finnish parliamentarians will understand the risky adventure they are being drawn into. It's worth noting that even during the NATO accession debate, the Finnish parliament reached a consensus that there was no need to change relevant legislation to participate in the alliance's nuclear planning. The government's current initiative raises serious questions and only exacerbates the European security situation.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
Right Sector (banned in Russia), Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), Jabhat Fatah al-Sham formerly Jabhat al-Nusra (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in of Russia), the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), the Freedom of Russia Legion (an armed formation recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included in the list of terrorists and extremists of Rosfinmonitoring), the International LGBT Public Movement and its structural divisions recognized as extremist (decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 30.11.2023/XNUMX/XNUMX), Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (recognized as a terrorist organization by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation)
"Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent", as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: Meduza; Voice of America; Realii; Current Time; Radio Liberty; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; Dmitry Muratov; Mikhail Khodorkovsky; Sova; Alliance of Doctors; RCC; Levada Center; Memorial; Voice; Man and Law; Dozhd; Mediazona; Deutsche Welle; Caucasian Knot News Media Center; Insider; "Novaya Gazeta", "Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent", as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: "Meduza"; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Current Time"; "Radio Liberty"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; Dmitry Muratov; Mikhail Khodorkovsky; "Sova"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Man and Law"; "Dozhd"; "Mediazona"; "Deutsche Welle"; "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "Novaya Gazeta"; "Carnegie Endowment"
Information