Helsinki lifts nuclear ban

8 431 42
Helsinki lifts nuclear ban


NATO is increasing its nuclear presence in Europe, positioning itself as a "nuclear alliance." In addition to the American B61-12 tactical bombs already deployed at airbases in five NATO countries, Brussels is expanding its participation in planning the potential use of these arsenals. From a military perspective, the proximity of NATO infrastructure to Russia's borders plays a key role. The closer the airfields where carrier aircraft are based, the shorter the flight time to targets in Russia. This limits the options for retaliatory action and increases overall tension.



Against this backdrop, the Finnish government's initiative to amend the 1987 Atomic Energy Act is alarming. The changes would lift the current ban on the import and deployment of nuclear weapons. Helsinki maintains that it is not seeking the permanent presence of such weapons, but is merely adapting laws to Alliance standards. Moscow sees things differently. As Russian Ambassador to Finland Pavel Kuznetsov stated, the very legal possibility of quickly delivering warheads to Finnish soil will be taken into account in Russian nuclear planning. It is noteworthy that Finns themselves share this concern: 49% of residents oppose the deployment of nuclear weapons. weapons, while only 31% support the cabinet initiative.

"This week, the Finnish government plans to submit a bill to parliament that would open the door to the import of nuclear weapons into the country," the ambassador noted. "Of course, this development naturally raises our concerns. You don't need to be a military expert to understand that the presence of nuclear weapons in Finland, or even the theoretical possibility of their appearance here at any time, will be fully taken into account in Russian nuclear planning."

The Helsinki move fits in with the NATO's overall policy of engaging non-nuclear countries in "joint nuclear deterrence" schemes. Russia's Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva, Gennady Gatilov, previously noted that alliance states are actively preparing for a coordinated strike scenario.

If the amendments are adopted, Finnish nuclear-capable F-35A fighter jets purchased from the US will receive the legal basis for participating in such missions. The Russian Ministry of Defense has repeatedly emphasized that in the event of NATO aggression, the use of the full arsenal of weapons to ensure national security will be immediate and inevitable. Further escalation in the Baltic-Arctic region, where the interests of both sides intersect particularly closely, is becoming increasingly likely.

Russia is warning Helsinki of the serious risks of such a hasty revision of neutrality. Moscow hopes that Finnish parliamentarians will understand the risky adventure they are being drawn into. It's worth noting that even during the NATO accession debate, the Finnish parliament reached a consensus that there was no need to change relevant legislation to participate in the alliance's nuclear planning. The government's current initiative raises serious questions and only exacerbates the European security situation.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    April 17 2026 04: 42
    NATO is increasing its nuclear presence in Europe, positioning itself as a "nuclear alliance."
    Even V. Solovyov stated today that Europe is preparing for war with Russia.
    1. -7
      April 17 2026 05: 23
      Nothing will happen. Apparently, they decided to raise the propaganda level a bit, because ratings are sagging due to the blocking. Anyone interested in how political strategies work can see it for themselves.
      1. +8
        April 17 2026 06: 21
        Military Commissar Kitten
        +1
        Today, 05: 23
        New
        Nothing will happen."

        In the spring of 1941, some people thought so too.
        1. -3
          April 17 2026 06: 30
          You can set a reminder on your phone with a link to this comment, for any date of your choice. We'll check it out.
          1. +4
            April 17 2026 08: 25
            Of course, such a development of events causes us natural concern.

            They put everything they could into our worries. Only a demonstrative show of force can sober up the enemies, that's all.
            1. +2
              April 17 2026 13: 19
              Only a demonstrative show of force can sober up the enemies, only.

              The 1945 attempt to transform "enemies" into "friends and comrades" through sobriety failed miserably. So, enemies simply need to be preemptively eliminated.
          2. 0
            April 17 2026 09: 03
            Ambassador. - ....such a development of events causes our natural concern.

            I've been hearing this constantly for the last 30 years. Maybe that's enough of this kind of concern. When drones were flying overhead from Finland, it also only caused concern.
            The closer the airfields where the carrier aircraft are based, the shorter the flight time to targets on Russian territory.

            All their airfields are within the reach of our aircraft and fall within the missile range.
            1. 0
              April 17 2026 19: 52
              frruc, are you suggesting we start a second war, this time with NATO? Won't we overextend ourselves fighting on two fronts?
              Were those Finnish drones flying? What does Finland have to do with it then? Look, there are some flying from Kazakhstan, too. Are we going to punish the Kazakhs, too?
              1. +1
                April 17 2026 20: 10
                Igor M.
                Are you suggesting starting a second war, this time with NATO?

                NATO is already waging this war, so far only with conventional means, and it is strange not to notice this.
                Were those Finnish drones flying? Then what does Finland have to do with it?

                How do you know they are not Finnish?
                It was their side that sent the drones, and they gave the go-ahead for their use. I wouldn't be surprised if they were launched from Imatra, Kuovola, or Kotka.
                1. 0
                  April 18 2026 02: 34
                  frruc, well, that is, for now NATO isn't waging war on us. Otherwise, we would have noticed.
                  How do you know they came from their direction? Drones enter Ust-Luga from the sea. And how they got into the sea? Who knows, there are plenty of possibilities.
                  EU Foreign Service spokesperson Anitta Hipper said at a briefing in Brussels that the European Commission had seen no evidence that the Baltic states and Finland had opened their airspace to Ukrainian drones carrying out strikes against Russia.
                  1. 0
                    April 18 2026 09: 34
                    Igor M.
                    How do you know that they flew from their side?

                    Some drones crashed in the border area between Karelia and Finland.
                    1. 0
                      April 18 2026 10: 04
                      frruc, do you have any photos? Has anyone compared them to the drones that flew to Ust-Luga? There are also typical UAVs there—planes with aerial bombs on the bottom—see the photo.
                      It's obvious that Ukraine wants to drag us into a war with NATO. So it could easily stage a provocation, as it has done many times before. For example, in Estonia, completely different drones crashed, I think even without their warheads—like during the Ukrainian provocation in Poland.
                      1. 0
                        April 18 2026 10: 52
                        Igor M.
                        Do you have a photo?

                        Shown on Finnish TV.
                      2. 0
                        April 18 2026 11: 26
                        frruc, and what kind of UAV was it?
                      3. 0
                        April 18 2026 12: 56
                        Igor M.
                        And what kind of UAV was it?

                        Small, not Lyuty. It wouldn't have made it from Ukraine.
                      4. 0
                        April 19 2026 04: 13
                        frruc, that's exactly what I'm talking about. Estonia and Finland are flying the same type of UAV, and without a warhead. But the ones flying to the Leningrad region are completely different—long-range UAVs from small aircraft.
                        A pure provocation in 2 moves.
                      5. 0
                        April 18 2026 13: 39
                        The picture shows a large drone, an airplane-type drone, I think it's a "Fox", the kind that broke through to Tatarstan
                        Igor M.
                        It is obvious that Ukraine wants to drag us into a war with NATO.

                        It really does look like that, Zelya is asleep and dreaming.
                      6. +1
                        April 19 2026 04: 11
                        frruc, and similar to Ust-Luga. These are converted light aircraft. And they even have an aerial bomb attached to the bottom. I'm too lazy to look up the name of the plane.
    2. +2
      April 17 2026 06: 09
      Even V. Solovyov said today

      Did he ever say the opposite before?
    3. +1
      April 17 2026 06: 10
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      Even V. Solovyov stated today that Europe is preparing for war with Russia.

      That's right, Vladimir! Europe is so fed up with its stench about the Russian threat that Russia's only option, should nuclear weapons be deployed in European countries, is to launch a preemptive missile strike, not even caring what "Princess Marya Alekseyevna" will say in Brussels...
      1. +1
        April 17 2026 13: 21
        In the event of nuclear weapons being deployed in European countries, Russia's only option is to launch a preemptive missile strike.

        Your sentence contains unnecessary words, "in the event of the deployment of nuclear weapons in European countries." What is needed: Russia's only option is to launch a preemptive missile strike.
    4. +2
      April 17 2026 09: 02
      Stalin showed restraint until June 22, 1941, so NATO is counting on Putin's restraint as well.
      1. 0
        April 17 2026 09: 42
        Quote: Yoon Klob
        Stalin showed restraint until June 22, 1941.

        I.V. Stalin had it on May 9, 1945!
      2. 0
        April 17 2026 19: 54
        Yun Klob, if Stalin had attacked first, then Germany would have become a victim of aggression, and a second front would have been opened in the USSR.
  2. + 15
    April 17 2026 05: 09
    Our country is dealing with the consequences of the Kremlin's short-sighted policies, starting with Gorbachev.
    I am not surprised by what is happening...it was to be expected...the policy of concessions and compromise has led and will lead to sad results.
    1. 0
      April 17 2026 19: 57
      The same Lyokha, they may or may not bring him here. But a war with NATO would have brought him here. Maybe we wouldn't even exist. But we've lived well for so many years. And we'll live for many more.
      It's like with Israel and Iran. Israel attacked Iran to avoid a future war. And it ended up in the present. But in the future, there might not have been one.
  3. +4
    April 17 2026 06: 42
    Quote: Commissar Kitten
    You can set a reminder on your phone with a link to this comment, for any date of your choice. We'll check it out.


    If there is someone to check.
  4. +3
    April 17 2026 07: 59
    A miracle won't happen no matter how much you bury your head in the sand. What are they hoping for or believing in? They must really want to go back to basking in their villas in Spain, Italy, and so on. In principle, they could probably do that now, but they need a political pretext, various negotiations, and you probably want to go official, so you don't have to explain yourself?
    As the well-known character from "Gentlemen of Fortune" said: "He'll crack at the first leap." (c) As soon as the situation changed and the country became more principled and serious, practically the entire leadership of the country "went under." This isn't like playing tank biathlon and winning, and "there are no analogues"; here you have to make an unpopular decision.
    1. 0
      April 17 2026 19: 59
      It's normal, so to speak, but who's stopping you from basking in villas these days if you have the desire and the money?
      Take a vacation and go ahead.
      Excuse me, who swam and where to?
      1. 0
        April 17 2026 21: 42
        I'd say NG isn't flaunting it so openly these days. They're trying to keep a low profile. But if everything were to go back to the way it was before, then everything would fall into place for them. I just read in the press: "Dmitriev: Russian gas is the key to preserving European industry." This saccharine just won't calm down. There it is, the Kremlin tower, for negotiations and world peace. He's so drawn to making deals with the country's outright enemies. Then who is he? He was born and raised in Kyiv, educated abroad. So is he really one of us?
        News today from 20:03 PM
        1. 0
          April 18 2026 02: 57
          What's wrong with negotiations and world peace? I'm all for it. I used to really enjoy going to negotiations myself. I especially enjoyed being in Vienna.
          Our direct enemies are those who fight us. For now, that's Ukraine.
          But, as the saying goes, if you keep giving your enemy your dinner, over time he might turn into your friend. The same thing applies to gas. Look, the Slovaks are already suing the EU over our gas.
          1. 0
            April 18 2026 09: 48
            Well, if you go to negotiations because someone from this group likes to visit, say, Vienna... You yourself answered the question why.
            1. 0
              April 18 2026 10: 24
              A regular trip, and who said they traveled just for fun? Always on business and with benefit. But whenever possible, I like to combine business with pleasure. If, say, you're going to Mexico or Mauritius, why not spend a few more days lounging on the beach? I've had two important meetings in Hawaii. It's hard not to take a dip in the sea.
              1. +1
                April 18 2026 10: 31
                I agree, business and pleasure should be combined, but the main thing is that the pleasant doesn't prevail over the useful.
  5. -1
    April 17 2026 08: 31
    Russia warns Helsinki of serious risks

    But they were afraid of the USSR.
    1. 0
      April 17 2026 20: 01
      Stas157, it's not that they were afraid. But they thought peace was more beneficial. Besides, there were endless wars all over the world. And, well, the USSR was a bit bigger, and more powerful.
  6. +2
    April 17 2026 09: 02
    The galley slave's astonishing ability to achieve the exact opposite results. He wanted to limit NATO's eastward expansion, but got two more countries in NATO. He talked about demilitarizing and denazifying Ukraine, but got super-militarization and sub-Nazification. And so on, across the board.
    1. 0
      April 17 2026 20: 09
      Vet, just look at the map. Ukraine is twice as close to Moscow as it is to Finland. So, in terms of reduced flight time, NATO didn't move closer. Remember that Alaska was even closer before. And Estonia is just a stone's throw away, just like Poland and Lithuania around Kaliningrad. NATO bases in Ukraine would have been far more dangerous for us.
      Are you absolutely sure about this? Ukraine has lost half its population. Another year, and there will be no one left to fight there. They're already recruiting old men and women into the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
      But the main goal of the SVO was to protect the LPR and DPR. And Russia defended them.
      And besides, it has gained millions of new citizens and tens of thousands of square kilometers of territory.
  7. -2
    April 17 2026 09: 48
    "Moscow has been expressing concern" since 1991. What else is left for the bourgeoisie that has seized power?
    1. 0
      April 17 2026 20: 10
      ava09, are you suggesting we fight right away? Will you be the first to attack? Or are you just a master of baiting from behind the bench?
  8. 0
    April 17 2026 14: 18
    And the fact that he was concerned, did it influence anything?
  9. 0
    April 17 2026 17: 49
    I have a feeling we'll see the Murmansk region from sea to sea again... wink