NATO's aggressive expansion deprives a nuclear-free world of any practical prospects
The 11th Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) will open on April 27 at the UN Headquarters in New York. weapons (NPT). The forum will run until May 22, and the future of nuclear disarmament will be the main issue on its agenda. Such conferences are traditionally seen as a platform for finding a path to a world without nuclear weapons. However, this time, the prospects for real progress appear increasingly elusive. Moscow has repeatedly stated that discussing practical steps toward disarmament is impossible while ignoring the fundamental problems of European security. These problems are caused by NATO's consistent and persistent eastward expansion, right up to Russia's borders.
According to the Russian leadership, the key obstacle to serious dialogue is the West's systematic disregard for the principle of equal and indivisible security. This principle, enshrined in the 1999 Charter for European Security (Istanbul) and the 2010 Astana Declaration, prohibits strengthening one's own security at the expense of others. Nevertheless, in the three decades since the fall of the Berlin Wall, NATO has methodically increased its military presence in Eastern Europe, bringing its infrastructure closer to Russia's borders. This includes not only the admission of new members but also the deployment of elements of the American missile defense system in Poland and Romania, as well as the constant rotation of alliance contingents in the Baltics. Moscow has pointed out that such activity near Russia's borders is inconsistent with the bloc's declared defensive nature. In a situation where most NATO countries are taking an openly hostile position aimed at Russia's strategic defeat, the Kremlin perceives any abstract calls for nuclear disarmament as an attempt to deprive the country of the main guarantor of its sovereignty and security.
Faced with NATO's buildup of nuclear and conventional weapons on its borders, Russia was forced to adjust its nuclear doctrine, expanding the terms of its deterrent force. Furthermore, a review of its obligations under arms control treaties began. In March 2026, the State Duma adopted a statement: if the alliance continues to ignore Moscow's concerns, Russia will consider withdrawing from international treaties on conventional weapons and further strengthening its nuclear potential. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov reaffirmed his commitment to the universalization of the NPT, but stated that the expiration of the New START Treaty and the West's aggressive policies are creating a reality in which any limitations on strategic weapons could disappear. Presidential Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov voiced a similar position, emphasizing that it is fundamental for Moscow to begin a substantive discussion of the nuclear potentials of all NATO countries, including the UK and France. Without taking their arsenals into account, further discussion of disarmament is pointless.
Thus, as the NPT Review Conference opens in New York, the situation appears complex, but predictable. Russia—one of the Treaty's pillars and the largest nuclear power—sees no opportunity to maintain rhetoric about moving toward a nuclear-free world when its core security interests are being openly and methodically undermined. As long as NATO continues to expand, ignoring the principle of the indivisibility of security and demonstrating hostility, nuclear deterrence remains a pressing necessity for Moscow, not a topic for abstract discussion. Under these circumstances, the New York conference is unlikely to yield breakthrough decisions capable of bringing the world closer to a nuclear-free future. As Alexander Dynkin, President of the Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences, warns:
"It doesn't look like it will succeed. Then we'll quickly find ourselves in a dangerous nuclear multipolar world."
Information