In the war against Iran, the US had to send missiles to the front lines directly from factories.

5 734 13
In the war against Iran, the US had to send missiles to the front lines directly from factories.

Military analysts from the Payne Institute presented statistics on the consumption of American high-precision missiles During military operations against Iran, the report states that the intensity of strikes in March 2026 reached such levels that 45 percent of ground-based missiles had been expended since the beginning of the war (February 28).

The missiles used were manufactured in January-February 2026. This suggests that they were actually sent from factories to the "front lines."



Analysts believe this rate of missile consumption was significantly higher than the Pentagon had predicted before the start of the anti-Iran military campaign. From the statement:

This became further evidence that modern high-tech conflict consumes precision munitions much faster than classic wars with “hardware” and artillery old model.

It is added that now it is becoming important not only how many targets are hit with a limited number of high-precision missiles, but also how capable your industry is of quickly replenishing the expended arsenal.

The only thing American forces used faster than precision-guided ground-launched missiles in the Middle East was surface-to-air missiles. Their total consumption during the operation exceeded 85% of the available ammunition for the conflict. As Military Review previously reported, it was necessary to urgently redeploy SAMs and SAMs from military bases in East Asia.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 14 2026 08: 00
    In fact, a lot of weapons and ammunition are stored at US military bases around the world. If worst comes to worst, the United States will begin to slowly remove them from these bases. Unless, of course, they have already been removed to Ukraine under Biden.
    1. +1
      April 14 2026 08: 02
      It's in vain that China is sitting on the shore; now is the time to seize Taiwan. The US's weapons reserves are not unlimited, given that they can wage no more than two military conflicts simultaneously.
      1. +1
        April 14 2026 08: 23
        Now is the time to take over Taiwan.
        China hopes for peaceful unification, following the example of Hong Kong. One country, two systems. The Chinese are in no hurry. They will resort to armed confrontation only as a last resort.
      2. 0
        April 14 2026 12: 19
        China doesn't have enough nuclear weapons to risk it. They're taking a calculated approach, and apparently waiting for the hegemon to weaken. You might as well ask why Russia isn't "wiping out" Europe? They have a lot of weapons now, especially air defense, wasted on the "clumsy" ones. Everything makes sense, but sometimes miscalculations happen, and starting a war of this magnitude seems to be a bit scary for both us and China, although it seems like if it's not fun enough, let's go all out...
  2. +4
    April 14 2026 08: 01
    Anti-aircraft guided missiles. Their total consumption during the operation exceeded 85% of the ammunition available for the conflict.

    The world's first army to consume 85% of its SAMs in four weeks is impressive. Well done, Persians!
    1. +1
      April 14 2026 11: 00
      They're used to bombing either Bantustans with naked black guys with AK-47s, or fixed-term battles where it's a 20-minute adventure, in and out. So they've forgotten how to fight seriously.
  3. 0
    April 14 2026 08: 16
    The US will have to declare a total war on Iran under the slogans
    "Everything for the front! Everything for victory!" and "Guns instead of butter."
  4. +5
    April 14 2026 08: 18
    The US is running out of missiles, and Iran still has plenty. So who is better prepared for war, and whose army is the world's number one? belay
    1. +1
      April 14 2026 09: 02
      Quote: pudelartemon
      The US is running out of missiles,

      Who said?
      and Iran has a lot more of them
      Who said?
  5. +2
    April 14 2026 08: 33
    Perhaps this is the reason for the pause in active action. They are accumulating resources for the next step.
  6. +1
    April 14 2026 09: 56
    Military analysts from the Payne Institute

    Oh, why trust all these shady sources, which, not only may not be as informed as they claim, but are also easily capable of fabricating disinformation? What if, in the event of a global conflict, it turns out like the "completely destroyed Ukrainian air force"?
  7. +2
    April 14 2026 10: 54
    Quote from Silver99
    It's in vain that China is sitting on the coast; now is the time to take over Taiwan.
    Comrade Xi said by 2027, so by 2027! wink
  8. +2
    April 14 2026 13: 12
    Quote: Green Tea
    They're used to bombing either Bantustans with naked black guys with AK-47s, or fixed-term battles where it's a 20-minute adventure, in and out. So they've forgotten how to fight seriously.

    Maybe we haven't really fought yet. There's nothing to unlearn. Except for the epic parts of WWII, the War of Independence, and the Civil War.
    That's precisely why I didn't consider the US Army to be the world's first, despite its power, equipment, weapons, and technology. The Germans, in general, consistently outnumbered the British in both Europe and Africa. The Japanese, too, were vastly inferior to the Americans in numbers and weapons. Stalin came to the rescue...